Trots tend to become neo-cons

Who are the legit Lefties?

And more importantly, how do we safeguard against cults like these that are planted on the Left to destroy us from the inside?

Other urls found in this thread:

israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/persecuted-jews.html
youtube.com/watch?v=ldqhPbdkFks#t=2m50s
marxism.csbs.utah.narkive.com/jNx0t3o4/trots-neocons-why
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

this has literally never happened

I mean, I'm sure it's happened once or twice.

From what I've seen anarchists who don't realize what the hell they're talking about tend to become leftcoms

I am the true leftist. It is me.

it happens more the other way around i think

There are no anarchists over 30, so they must become something. What do they become?

nice meme

Lmao no
The neocons trace their intellectual heritage to trotsky, in the same sense that postmodernists and the frankfurt school trace theirs to marx.
No actual trot becomes a neocon. Pabloists, maybe.

Worm food.

Christian Socialists.

XDDDD

At a guess, apolitical.

Lol

Rebel pls

epic samefag there
Go back to /sp/, replaying to the same post over and over isn't funny.

De-Spook yourself

TOP KEK

no one, even deleonists and syndicaists decay into falangists.

Alrighty then. I guess the human race is doomed.

LOL children. There is no attempt to subvert your movements. You're doing exactly as the jews want you to.


My favorite quote. Its by a 15th century Rabbi: from Libbre David

"To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly."
israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/persecuted-jews.html

Gee user, that's an awefully funny thing to write…

fuck off, goy

Been lookin around here a bit…
Don't you think its a little, LAME, that you stole all of Holla Forums's culture, and can't even create original and funny shit?
(FFS the bare minimum you tards could have done was to learn from the geniuses whose culture you now use).

inb4 communism works maaaaan
youtube.com/watch?v=ldqhPbdkFks#t=2m50s
indoctrinated slaves BTFO

definitely not a kike. you kikes do a poor poor job of stealing pol's culture.

I know you're not. It's deeply offensive to even consider that.

Now get the fuck out, disgusting goyim trash.

Literally this.


Also this. Once you've gotten a taste for anarchy, everything else pales in comparison. So if you give it up it's probably because you're burnt out and cynical.

trots -→ social dems –→ neoliberals

Obshchina were only true left that actually worked IRL then bols fucked their shit up.

Sounds like me. Although, I think I just got less edgy.

Maoist third worldists

What about Frank Miller? Didn't he switch from being a left leaning libertarian to a right wing libertarian?

You Holla Forumsyps did a shit job stealing revleft culture tbh

How new are you? You didn't even copy the culture right.

Inb4 race is fundamental

Ayy, The swedish social democrat party used to talk about collective ownership and generaly socialist ideas.
Now they don't.
They became liberals but were not at one point.

Confirmed from personal experience.


There is at least one prominent example on everyone’s mind, and that is Christopher Hitchens.


I’m glad to note that I’ve only become leftier over time, and even more so once I became an employed and tax-paying citizen. But I’ll probably end up a shitlib socdem tbh fam, sorry

Trots become neo-cons? Since when? Who? What is this assertion founded on?

lefties in damage control SHOCKER.

google it for fuck sake.

marxism.csbs.utah.narkive.com/jNx0t3o4/trots-neocons-why

Will you spam this meme in every damn thread?

Obviously Leninists.

Also I find anarchists tend to go fascist as well, after going tankie ofc.

This does seem like the obvious answer. Can y'all explain to a (((visitor))) why some of the left hate him?

Trots in the US in the 1930s are not necessarily representative.

Old British Trot orgs from the 80s for example are still full of the same old Trots, from youth to old age

Stalinists that are not edgy tankies aka actual followers of the Stalin Thought. I know a lot of old 70+ years old communists who are Stalinists all their life.

Pure Leninists

Who, Lenin?

If you hate Lenin you're an anarchist. That's it.

Yeah, people like to shit on socdem but that's almost exclusively Yurops with bad parties in their country. The actual ideology is a sort of left-leaning radical centrism that is very useful to us and totally set apart from liberals.

this is a pretty good troll tbh but do you literally not have anything better to do

Well meme'd :^)


Why are you enabling him?


Pure ideology SNIFFFF
By the way, I can perfectly see Zizkek alienating himself so much from the left that he makes his own alt-left thing, then that's what "pure Leninists" (actually NeoLeninists) can become.

Because he destroyed the soviets and betrayed the working class.

He was more a neocon apologist. There's no inherent contradiction in acknowledging certain interventions do bring objective gains in human rights etc. while maintaining they are essentially imperialist in character. Like the issue of immigration, islamism is something we have only a long-term solution to.

Citation desperately needed. Also anarchists usually become liberals jk they are from the start

ehhh?

SocDems become fascists, once the crisis hits.
Tankies remain tankies on ideology, but tend to become bourgies on class.

Name literally one.
The result is always a right wing shithole either because some shit like Pinochet or Suharto gets installed, or because they just kill off the left and leave nothing left but ISIS or such.

Take Kosovo, for instance, the majority of the ethnic cleansing didn't start until after interventions from NATO drove the situation to a frenzy.

What does that phrase even mean anyway?
IdPol liberals are the "regressive left"
Communists are the "regressive left"
Bernie bros will probably also be called that.
Is it just filler? You bet it is.

I mean… Iraq. Afghanistan.

Is this satire?

It's a term we use for authoritarians who cloak themselves in the stylings of progress, while using their influence solely for the purpose of further securing and gathering yet more influence.

bans for all? Psychotic moderation and moderators? Opposing Views? kekno.

Anarchists already are libertarians you fool. Fuck you and your Burger language.

im beyond triggered, i am a libertarian which is the same term as anarchist. The word was invented because of the persecution in France towards anarchists.

What a bunch of nonsense. Anarchists, the people who've literally fought in wars against Fascists become them. That's beyond stupid.

But who knows, you're probably using the word "fascist" in as some meaningless buzzword.

It's not the thirties lad.

Even today you fool

No. Today a mob of useful idiots under the banner of anti-fa and funding of globalists take to the streets en masse to intimidate and violate anybody who dare show patriotism. There is nothing heroic about this. Don't kid yourself.

Wasn't talking about them.

Anyways, although they act like directionless liberals, they do go after nationalists regardless.

Buddhists.

That picture is wild. Thanks. Now I just need a 6x10' print of it for the next time I trip.

P O T T E R Y
O
T
T
E
R
Y

What impetus does a Buddhist have for caring about the suffering caused by capitalism?

...

I'm Titoist, I am yet to move to any other ideology.

peter kropokin died at 78

i wish it was, now where basicaly just the purge

anarchism was something then

Fuck off anti-Semite