Friendly reminder: If you prefer small tits or flat chests, you are provably a low-testosterone beta soyboy...

Are we being baited?

How is anything but small tiddies best tiddies

...

...

That second image is legit hilarious.

Faggot.

Why put so much effort in to a bait thread?

...

Having big tits because you're a fatass is like having a fast car because you drove it off a cliff. At least post attractive women with big tits instead of fatasses.

it doesn't matter how big your tits are; it's how good they look.

OP confirmed for furfag.

this.

Whoops, forgot links.
jsselwood.tumblr.com/tagged/photo
OP got those fat tats from a furry artist's tumblr page.

dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1350919/Why-ARE-womens-breasts-getting-bigger-The-answers-disturb-.html

this except that big tits look bad.

>NEEDING AN ARGUMENT TO LIKE TITS
You are a faggot and a furry, and your overcompensation is only making my dick harder.

t. soyboy

...

Nah, I just didn't want to limit to her. I might dip back into the folder eventually.

It is not the size that matters. It is whether or not she lets you touch them.

I don't know what I prefer because I haven't had either.

There's no hair on her tits, soyboy. Your excuses mean shit. You have low testosterone and you're a genetic failure.

...

big, full, supple tits are nice, but these floppy cow sacks that border on hyper are just disgusting. if you're gonna post big tits make sure they have bounce and aren't flabby pancakes.

I like all tits. Because I'm a red-blooded man and not some fag in the closet that needs to justify his love of tits.

Possibly deliberately but I'll spell the point out for you: You wouldn't have those pictures if you didn't hit up her page in the first place. And since there's much better sources for fat tits, you must have been drawn there for another unrelated reason. That reason being the art, which is fully of furries. Like this one.

...

Your logic is that of a soyboy. No imbecile, she's far better known for her tits than her "art". I honestly had no idea she did furry art, I first found a gif of her tits and reverse-image searched it. The first article I found was a bitter, jealous article on EncyclopediaDramatica from some girl in the cosplay community jealous of her tits. The only art on that article is non-nude.

You've also both just posted actual furry art, and demonstrated that you only know of her for her furry art, outing yourself as the thing you're attacking me with showing that it's a facade of projection, and you are SELF-PROCLAIMED FAGGOT.

So shut the fuck up, I don't talk to faggots, faggot.

...

>Somehow getting to the page to save the pictures without seeing any of the furshit that's all over the page
How do you think I even found out that the tits belonged to a furry in the first place? I ran the images through RIS and hey what do you know? The lead me to a furry's page. Though, to be fair they led me to the DA page and I entered the username and ", tumblr" into google to find any tumblr page they might've come from, leading me to the tumblr. By the way both have furshit all over. Should repeat that.

But you already knew anyways. Because you're a furry and a faggot.

And you're still going through loops to justify liking tits rather than just liking tits because you aren't a fag.

...

So you're saying you found them the same way as me you colossal, repetitive defensive faggot?

Posting facts you mean. And you so brutally got pounded in your fag ass with the facts you've tried to switch topics to furries. Sad!

That manga severely sucks to be honest.

...

I like small women because they make me feeler even more big and powerful than I already am. Flat girls know they're worthless as anything but fucktoys. That's what makes them so much more erotic. You feel like a fucking beast every time they squeal in pain from your massive throbbing cock.
I'm going to keep pounding flatchested Stacys. Stay mad chubbychaser. Go home to your mommy milkers.

Fat girls are loose anyway

2nd pic is something else

Nice tits are one of the very few advantages a woman has

Would fug/10

Pretty sure that lost one is heavily shopped.

Chick is fat. You like fat chicks.

that bitch is sexy but her tits are too big

51 replies to this thread?
Wow, fishing is good here!

...

You just admitted tits make you feel threatened, which is because you're a low-t soyboy. You proved OP right.

Yes, yes you like having your tiny cock put into a cage and laughed at. Why must you tell us?

Step away from the burgers, user.

...

seafaring ships were a mistake

kek

The first step is admitting you have a problem, user.

Don't worry, the entire nation will be dead of heart attack soon enough.

Not necessarily. They could be homosexuals that are still closeted. Did you know that lots of gay men actually get married to women and have lives with them?

meep meep how horrifying tbh no homo

I once dated a girl who experienced this. Well, it was her mom with her dad. Her mom was kind of a dog. Her boss married her. One day she found gay porn in his drawer, apparently he'd look at it before sex. He claimed be bought it by mistake.

Turned out he was waiting for his dad to die. As soon as he did he came out of the closet and started taking sex trips to Thailand and appearing in gay pride parades. The mom was the worst of both worlds, flat and fat.

Ugly women need to wake up and smell the coffee. They need to realize their purpose is to act as seed wombs for homosexual sperm, and that after the deed is done our reluctant penises will then thankfully go back to consentual homosexual sex.

HOLY SALT MINES BATMAN

I gotta admit thinking back on her, he was doing society a service by staying in the closet. He had two kids, their IQs were ridiculously high. My ex had like 8 degrees and spoke as many languages. She was smart as fuck.

Big tits are doomed to sag, small ones hat fit into the cup of your hand are best.

FLAT IS JUSTICE

t.totally not a pedo

...

Fake news. Small tits sag as much as big ones, difference is big ones still look good in bras.

...

You should stop posting crack whores user..

Your causal link and methodology are both seriously flawed. You have to have gone to college to say something this stupid…

Rich men do not make up 99% of the fucking population of men. I don't know how you can make an error on that level. Stay in school. There's a reason that the rich are called the 1%. Which by the way, is not the same 1% of the population at all times, people move in and out of that 1% of the population all the time, it's only particularly rich individuals such as the Clintons, George Soros, Bill Gates, Elon Musk .. you know, the rich fuckers who are literally trying to destroy society, that are permanently 1%ers.

Secondly, you've provided zero actual data to support your idea that chest size preference is linked to testosterone or sociability. You linked one fucking profile, and you're like "THIS IS THE GOLD STANDARD OF BETA" and that's stupid. Once again, stay in school. You obviously need to. Make sure you're not late for school, Jimmy.

Using anecdotal evidence is not evidence of anything. Trump, Tommy Lee Jones and J Howard Marshall is NOT 99% of the population of men. You've provided no actual data, in fact, you linked to stupid sources that are non-credible. No actual science studies, hell you linked to the fucking Daily Mail and Huff Post, you might as well go fucking huff paint, you'll get more accurate data from doing that then you will from a UK-based newspaper.

Also just an FYI, there is no such thing as a "testosterone level." Did you read Fight Club and assume that Robert Paulson was saying something intelligent when he said that shit about upping the estrogen level? That's not how it works. Steroids regularly cause breast growth, but it's not because of testosterone and estrogen levels, it's due to the fact that steroids stimulate tissue growth (you know, the way that it stimulates muscle growth?). You've "proven" nothing, and I'm sure you'll post some trollface acting like le ebig troll, you were just pretending to be retarded, but you really are a stupid waste of braincells.

...

You have demonstrated an ironically high level of ignorance given the arrogance of your post. Let's start with your biggest fuck up that demonstrates unquestionably that you lack even the most basic reading comprehension.

You read

And responded:

Demonstrating you read it backwards and proving the point you were calling stupid. The study claimed rich men (1%) were the group that preferred small breasts. The question was binary, meaning the remaining portion (yes timmy, 100 minus 1 is 99%) preferred large breasts. Fucking DUH. But beyond that it was pointed out even rich men prefer big breasts so the study is worthless.

It's all in the second post, imbecile:

Specifically: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22722955

researchgate.net/publication/18778651_Correlates_of_heterosexual_somatic_preference

To quote psychologist Stuart Fischoff:

"Men who like small-breasted women are often seeking a more submissive, non-threatening partner. Also, you may get the psychological hint that she’s not trying to compete with other women who have larger breasts, and therefore she’ll be loyal to you. Or maybe the very first girl you had a crush on had small breasts, and if she constructed your earliest example of what’s sexy, her memory may still lead you to find small-breasted women exciting."

Two studies and a quote, dipshit.

more like this anyone?

I can't deny a request from triple-8's. I'll dump my "breast envy" folder.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

So someone who's bi-sexual and likes both big and small tits blatantly fucks with your whole shtick. Cool.

Nah, that fits into the data quite nicely. Men who prefer big tits = strictly heterosexual. Men who prefer small tits = more likely to identify as genderfluid, gay, bisexual, flexible, etc. Lower standards. So actually your statement further proves me right, soyboy.

...

...

...

...

...

...

>>>/4chan/

...

T LEVELS RISING

the average bra size is not D, especially anywhere outside the US. I don't give a fuck about tits, all that matters is a nice ass

It is the average. Gosh, can't any of you idiots read?

google.com/search?source=hp&ei=F7VGWtvQJszymAH2zbqwAg&q=average bra size&oq=average bra size&gs_l=psy-ab.3...667.7184.0.7400.31.20.5.0.0.0.365.2581.0j5j3j3.11.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..16.15.2421.0..0j35i39k1j0i131k1j0i131i20i264k1j0i20i264k1j0i10k1.0.bD5E1c7A6FI

theguardian.com/fashion/2015/aug/13/why-does-fashion-ignore-big-breasts

i.ytimg.com/vi/60XWJcQufUE/maxresdefault.jpg

FAX BE RAY-CIS FAM

...

Why is it so goddamned hard to find thicc and voluptuous or buxom without just being overweight.
Then again if they are not buxom they're fucking stickly.
Yes, I'm fucking mad.

...

...

Nice manface.

...

in your school or workplace, how many big titty bitches do you see regularly? 7/10 most girls you see have an average of B cups with an occasional C passing through and the large tits (D or above) are more than likely fake if the girl carrying those tits is the size of a toothpick. big tits are not the norm yet but the way diets are being tossed out nowadays, it will be soon.

also only real men prefer ass to tits because it was what attracted our ancestors. tits are for children

So first you present an anecdote while admitting you're underage B& as your frame of reference is school.

Second you try to defend preferring the part men have by saying cavemen who ate shit out of eachother's asses liked it.

You're a faggot soyboy, mate.

Watch out guys, we got an anecdote!

I once saw a tall Asian, therefor the statistics are wrong and they're all tall. Also, once I met a really smart black man, so niggers and IQ statistics are a myth. Trufax.

...

Friendly reminder: Hitler was the original soyboy.

At least he knew if he made them become soyboys during the war they'd lose.

the only part of a woman that I love is the feminine bepis

...

It's as if you retards don't know that HIPS are what makes a woman

Hitler also caught his cook putting meat in his food several times.

the fact that you morons think that models are what's really out here in reality by the fuckton, shows how little you get outside

The fact that you're confronted with factual statistical data and asserting that "what I saw in school" overrides that factual reality demonstrates you're both a narcissist and a child.

Because your "statistical data" lacks interpretation of said data.
Here have another nice uddergirl with ridicolous proportions.

It doesn't though. Cup size has increased to an average of D while band size has remained an average of 34,eliminating obesity as a cause. And the average height for girls is 5'4, so add those measurements up.

And yes, in my day to day life most girls I know are C cup or more, a small-chested girl is very rare and tends to be hormonally imbalanced or malnourished. Last three girls I slept with in order were DD, DDD and H cup respectively. And before you ask, only the H cup was chubby.

Lets try logic here, if american women are 40% obese, how does your bandsize argument lead to them not being obese?

You're playing games and suggesting a connection I've just proven isn't there. The average band size has not increased but breast sizes have. Do you get that? Do you understand there can be skinny women with large natural breasts, and there can be fat women with small breasts? The two things are provably independent, and if you want to assert a connection you'll have to provide a study to counter mine. Until them, stop being stupid and shut your faggot mouth.

Yes bodyweight is independent from cupsize. Didnt know that, wonder why you said that small chested girls are malnurished then if there is no correlation.

Nourished =/= obese, but obviously women need nutrients if they're to successfully go through puberty.

took your Google search and added 4 numbers to get the average size of C cups you absolute moron

modernmom.com/a1d713f4-3b45-11e3-8407-bc764e04a41e.htm

Yes and they also cannot go under a certain level of bodyfat even if they are generally skinny with big boobs.
In exhibit 1 she is rather starved, 2-3kg below her should be weight. Exhibit 2 shows her being skinny but having full tits.

OP are you a nigger? Why do you keep posting fat white women?

Do I need to print out the results, roll them into a wad of papers and smack your faggot mouth back and forth with it over and over until you just acknowledge that you're talking out of your ass and factually wrong and no amount of whinging will ever fucking change that you ignorant sack of shit?

Take a screenshot, nothing comes up for me.

Why are you so forceful about letting everyone know you're gay?

WHY CAN'T RUSSIA STOP WINNING?

l a t v i a
a
t
v
i
a

It was one of the greatest stories of adolescent friendship up until the bear arc happened.

...

ill fuck anything that moves tbh

...

...

i came, tbh

the only reason to perfer fat women is if you want them to love you and cuddle you and smother you and milk you while you milk them and being the little spoon
if your into that OP nothing is stopping you, nothing is stopping you from basically being in the subserviant role in a relationship to a hamplanet

Flat chested girls are the best girls

you have shit taste, my boner is kill

Tbh what killed my boner was niggress

Knew you were into dicks.

...

...

Your post is pure projection, soyboy.

I am just fat and try to fix my insecurities by finding thin woman.

plebeians.

Predictable.

P R O J E C T I O N.

You're covering for your own faggotry by posting landwhales. I mean you could have just started a thread for fat tits but instead you launched into this whole thing. You're acting like the priest does right before they find out he's been giving gas station blowjobs.

He's saying they're fat, lard hunter.

You're blatantly ignoring what was already pointed out. Men who prefer large breasts identify as strictly heterosexual, while men who prefer small breasts identify as bi, pan, etc. You hate big breasts because you're a soyboy. Now you can try to move goalposts and deny hating big tits, but the reality is you're a soyboy trying to deflect the discussion to someone else because you're EXPOSED. And your every word of hate, your every utterance of whining about how any woman over 50lbs is a landwhale only proves further 2what a massive faggot you are. So come back and screech how women with flat stomachs are obese because you're pitifully, miserably humiliated by their tits, soyboy. Prove me right again.

DO IT FAGGOT

He used the words "cows" and "udders" specifically referring to milk, because he's a soyboy. Your deflection only hammers in what a profound faggot you are. Keep chugging cocks and disgracing your poor parents homo.

Sure. Just like the man of God surely isn't diddling the altar boy, or the congressman against gay marriage isn't in drag servicing a gloryhole. Actions 100% always show someone's true intent and have never been used to try to compensate for something.
Then why are you trying so hard to prove why you love tits. You're a man right? That should be enough. Go on and write another paragraph showing how you aren't a faggot in disguise.

The fact that you're using made up tumblrite sexualities proves your faggotry beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Also
You're making an awful lot of assumptions there. You look at the rolls on the first pic in and tell me she's not fat.
For real though are you black? because that's normal but otherwise you need some standards.

Ooooooh, you're that faggot soyboy butthurt about all these arguments and data proving why you're a faggot.

No skippy, what's proving that you're a soyboy is your insane ramblings that every woman here is fat. There's a very simple rule, do her tits stick out farther than her stomach? If so, she can be chubby, she can be plump, and she can be thicc but not fat. Fat is for flatsos, or manboobs.

The other thing that proves you're a soyboy is the science. The studies. Which you keep trying to ignore. Guys who like big tits are straight, want to have kids and are the life of the party. Guys who like small tits are like the guy in the second OP image. Cucks with dick cages.

Nope. Saw tits, came into the thread and realized OP was, again, a faggot. Just a literal one.
Haven't called anyone fat, believe it or not multiple people have come into the thread. And Rolls are automatically fat. She's got fat tits, yes but the rest of her is also fat so she's FAT. And thicc isn't a word, don't type like a nigger.
You keep assuming I don't like fat tits, which is why I'm saying you're projecting. You're thinking that the only people that can say you're a huge faggot are the betas, when in reality you've taken a perfectly good potential thread about tits and have used it to try and prove you aren't a huge faggot.

You are. And every tl;dr reply, anecdotal example, and "I know you are but what am I?" response only shows it more.

You're not coming up with an argument, you're just asserting that faggots like what you perceive as fat. If this were the case, the modeling industry wouldn't be stuffed with anorexic, skeletal beanpoles. Faggots prefer skeles. Your screeching about fat is further proof you're gay. Thank you for proving me right again. Please, come back and tell me what a faggot you are some more. Now.

My argument is that fat women are fat. You haven't proved otherwise aside from some cheap "if her tits are big it doesn't count" bullshittery.
Meanwhile you lead off with , , as prime examples. They're fat. No amount of fat tits will erase the rest of the body and that you're saying someone in shape is "anorexic" is sad. You can have fat tits while not being a hamplanet.
You're a faggot, OP. And you're getting defensive over being called out on it.

That's a good little faggot. You came back and embarrassed yourself again just like I commanded you.

I'll dumb this down for you soyboy. You're asserting that fat = gay. Even if you could prove the women were fat (and I heavily dispute this) that's a matter of aesthetic taste, on par with saying "her ankles are too thick" or "she has big ears". Chubbychasers like foot fetishists exist among either gender and are independent of gay/straight binary. You have established no link between fat and gay, thus you're talking out of your ass.

Meanwhile, anyone can glance at the fashion industry and make an immediate connection between anorexic and gay, as faggots love the ultra thin and skeletal. Thus your complaining about fat indicates you're gay.

Now come back and hurt your image even more faggot. Obey.

Now you've stopped posting "facts" altogether. What happened to science? You're crying like a sad little faggot and pulling all the stop in trying to deflect now because you know I'm right. And I'm not saying fat is gay I'm saying fat is fat and you're posting fat shit. That's independent of your faggotry and you're falling apart trying to prove otherwise.

You aren't actually black right? Because you're starting to chimp out here :^)

You're one more tism fit away from just saying "Yeah? Well only gay faggots respond to this." and that's genuinely sad. You're getting whiny and emotional. Like a faggot.

Oh no! You greentexted stuttering! That totally refutes facts, right?

OH WAIT NO, IT DOESN'T!

You fail again soyboy.

What are you really so mentally challenged they need to be repeated over and over for you? They're all through the thread, you can't even counter them.

This is an assertion, did you mean to use an argument? Because you've yet to make one fagboy.

*golf clap* Soyboy concedes defeat and admits the entire basis of his spam is bullshit! If there's no connection between fat and gay, then you have no argument. I however have established a connection between screeching about fat and gay, so again you've established yourself as being in the same category as a gay fashion designer giving models "thinspiration". You and your anabuddy can go suck eachother off, but remember not to swallow!

I just like tits. As long as they aren't floppy sag bags or yams, I'm down. Yam tits are the worst.

I've been calling you a faggot and I'll keep doing so whether you like it or not. Because it's true and you're desperate to prove otherwise. No Fag throwing a hissy fit doesn't change that you're posting fatties, You've been the one trying to insist that I said that fat is gay and not that fat is fat. Go ahead and show me where I said hamplanets are gay and not just disgusting.

On top of you turning out to be an honest-to-god retard you are trying to say that me calling you a faggot and responding to your crying is spam. That's just plain dumb. My argument has and always will be that you're a faggot, and that you've been posting fatasses. You can't disprove either of those because in the first three posts you do both clearly.

Also has the right idea. He likes tits, and has no lengthy reason to convince himselfothers why.

Because he's not a faggot.

Glad someone understands me. Same goes for ass. As long as it's not dragging in the dirt behind her or flat as a fucking pancake, I can make it work.

Yes dear, we know. It's called projection. And your assertion for calling me it is an activity you admit is straight, while in so doing you're admitting you're gay. Now you keep screaming projections all you like sally, but let's make some progress. Your assertion is they're fat, biut in your obliviousness you missed that the gif in the OP is the same girl you quoted as fat in the other posts. The flatty in the fourth image was chosen in part because she has the same stomach, but doesn't have the great tits. Does the flatty look fat to you? If not, you have to admit Jessica Elwood isn't fat either.

Now seeing as you've already conceded that you're the only one committing gay acts right now, can you be a big boy and also concede you just got owned on the fat claim as well?

My nigga!

No fag, that's you.
Sorry but trying to save face isn't going to work this late in. You already threw a fit and revealed your ruptured rectum. Elwood, which I'm assuming is the whale in the first three posts, is fat. Especially in the second post's first pic. You can see the stomach poking out of the dress. That's fat. Not obese, but fat.

You know white-knighting isn't going to do anything right? She's not going to touch your dicklette.

Spoilering so they don't ruin your eyes. Yam tits are the worst. Tell me those tits don't look like some fucked up sweet potato.

If you consider this fat, you're certified gay. End of discussion.

Not gonna lie, I'd totally fuck the first and third one. Third one especially.

This entire post was made on the basis of "Let's go over some facts" and you didn't post a single fact.

Trends & statistics are literally not facts. They're observations that can't be replicated only simulated.

It's mathematically impossible for 'attraction to flat-chest' to mean you are a beta-male.

Alpha-male & beta-male are simply constructs that hold 0-basis in reality. They're simple observations of different behaviors of insecurities. "Alphas" are just as insecure which is why they demonstrate pre-emptive behavior.

heterosexuality & homosexuality are not states of action they are states of being. &It is a fact that you can embody any state of being you choose.

When you are sitting & playing a video game– you are in a state of being that is not in an active sexual embodiment. In that NOW which is all there is: you are not homo-hetero-bisexual.

If you are simply going off of the potential of what you could be then you are technically omni-sexual.

If you had sexual attraction to a guy (as a guy) & you could look into the future and you never had sexual attraction to a guy again(ever) would you still be homosexual because you had sexual attraction to a guy. //That sexual attraction no longer is experienced. Yet homosexuality is an experience of same-sex attraction.

This thread is not structure in reality but in a simulated reality.

basically called it, btw.

Oh a short and sweet response. Did I hit a nerve?
ARE YOU, IN FACT, THE CUCK?
Anyways yeah it's fat. If you took a second to look past your blind rage I also posted a fatty. Difference is I'm not going to dump a paragraph saying why I'd hit it.

Because I'm not a faggot, like you.

That they actually look like yams is actually kind of surprising and sad.

Hol up, you aren't ellwood herself are you? Because that'd be damn funny.

You got triggered, now you're just repeating yourself over and over again because you got owned. You're not even claiming she's fat anymore because you can't objectively claim this is. So you're backpeddling and just screeching faggot over again. You got owned on the fag claim, you got owned on the fat claim. You changed your tone and repeated yourself again.

Part of being an adult is admitting when you were wrong, but you can't because you're not an adult, you're a SOYBOY.

Two of those are photoshopped, dude..
I mean yeah, sorry tits are sorry, but i'm not going to get mad about literal fictional breasts.

The photos were pulled off a motherless gallery. I see what's going on. Apparently she scammed some furfags out of money so any time she's posted anywhere, furfags pop out of the wordwork and start screeching about how fat and ugly she is. That just makes the butterface hotter as far as I'm concerned lol.

Scamming is disrespectful, inherently.

There's not 1 demographic in society that wouldn't "be screeching" as the result of being scammed.

It's called "fuck you I want my money back".

I'd totally fuck the hell outta that midget in the second pic. Jenna, they her name isnt it…?

I literally said she's fat in the last post. Just like I said that I'm going to keep calling you faggot. Neither of these things have changed and your desperation to prove me wrong only looks more and more like overcompensation. She's fat and you're deluded. We've seen rolls, there's a gut in a pic, and you can see it in her face.

And now you're trying to say I'm a furfag because you can't disprove that she's fat and really need something to cling to. No faggot I'm not a furry, ellwood is fat, and your're white knighting so hard you might spontaneously grow a trilby. I'm serious, man, she's not going to touch your dick. It's okay to admit she's fat.

You can think someone is fat & still believe they can touch your dick, user like come the fuck on.

Just my opinion, butting into this little argument, she isn't fat, but she isn't like slender. She's voluptuous, which is fat, but in all the right places. So still fat, but the generally acceptable form of fat.

You're off to a bad start when your long-winded debunking post starts off with a bold-faced lie. Now every fact I post that was in the OP is going to be one time you've admitted you're a lying faggot.

FACT: Average bra size in the US is DD.
FACT: Studies have shown this isn't correlated with obesity as the band size has stayed the same.
FACT: In numerous studies men who preferred larger breasts were alpha, strictly heterosexual, the life of the party and wanted kids.
FACT: In the same studies the men who preferred smaller breasts hated competition, identified as less straight and in general were cucks who didn't want kids.
FACT: That second image is a real, unaltered fetlife profile of an actual soyboy with a small tit fetish.
FACT: You are a faggot.

Should I contact Holla Forums? This kraut just claimed race realism was wrong. These are the same kind of studies that found pedophiles are more likely to be retarded, blacks have lower IQs, asians tend to be shorter, etc. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them cease to be facts.

Except it was already proven and you've provided nothing to refute it other than a longwinded "NUH-UH!" This isn't an argument soyboy. You fail. Hard.

Keep telling yourself that you leftypol beta.

Relative your feelings maybe. But I can look at a "skinny" woman and think she's anorexic & that "fat" woman to be just fine. This seems very "what the hell ever to me."

Yeah, but it's furries and I don't know if whatever they're whining about even holds weight. I just know what I read in her ED article, and it reads like it was written by one of the furries. Either way I'd definitely fuck her.

Yeah it's like 3am here and I should sleep. Basically saying that OP can admit she's fat because defending her isn't going to earn him a handy from ellwood or anything.

Yeah, but the point is she's fat. That's what I've been trying to say but this literal potato can't even admit that much. The fact that he's needed to resort to calling me a furry shows how out of ammo he is.

And yet it disappears whenever she stands up. Virtually everyone has a gut sitting down hunched over. Besides that, who cares? Every reply in this thread would fuck her.

The gut is there when she's standing up. She's standing up in the picture she has the gut in. She's fat. And you're a faggot.

You're so obsessed with "winning" you can't see how absurd you look calling her fat. Now you've been reduced to "It's white knighting unless you accept my redefinition of what's fat!" I will never, ever fucking concede that a girl with huge tits, a flat stomach and a perfect hourglass frame is fat. That's completely fucking absurd.

Studies are inherently not facts, they're studies.
Studies are studies & facts are facts.

Study is not synonymous with fact.

You post claims that it's mathematically impossible to like big tits & be a beta.

Your post claims it's mathematically imposssible to like small tits & be an alpha.

There's no mathematical correlation between types of insecurities & sexual attraction.

You can ever only observe what this information means relative to you.

What does contacting Holla Forums mean? You're stating it's mathematically impossible for someone who visits Holla Forums to agree with me.
You're claiming they don't have a choice.

Alpha-male & beta-males are constructs created by us & are not inherent with what they mean to us. We give them meaning.

We define Alpha * beta males

That "second" image "proves" thgat he liked those "small tits"

That second image did not disprove that he doesn't like big tits or couldn't be attracted to them.

You're stating it's mathamatically impossible for someone from Holla Forums to think I'm full of shit. As if they do not have a choice.

Racial realism isn't right or wrong because it's not right or wrong it's an idea.

Ideas are not right or wrong.
Mathematics are the only thing that's "right" or will always be true.

Things that are not always true are not factual.

It's a fact that only facts are fact.

This is like saying "A pizza is not cheese, it's a pizza." The facts are inside the study, the findings off the study. You're trying to use weasel words to get out of the documented fact that you're a soyboy with shit taste.

This is what's called the "tall asian fallacy". Typical leftist thinking. You're trying to assert "This isn't a fact because there could be exceptions" and demand the majority be ignored in favor of your hypothetical exception, but the fact is in every study men who prefer small tits are soyboys. None of your whining will change this.

I'm pointing out that your claim would also dismiss race realism and IQ data as well as r/K selection theory among other things.

Anyone who tries to argue something is a "social construct" is a post-modernist. The idea of a construct is also a construct. Everything you're saying can be dismissed by your own logic.

how about some fucking nudes?

Coming from someone that is convinced anyone who disagrees is a "soyboy" and a furry that's really not saying much. You might as well say anyone that disagrees with you is a "hater" and be done with it. The fact is she's not skinny, and not average, so that leaves fat. She's fat and I refuse to believe anyone with that much jiggle isn't fat.

SHE IS CURVY, NOT FAT YOU MISOGYNIST SOYBOY

No, I said anyone who prefers small tits is a soyboy, that's backed up by studies. And I said the hostility towards her usually comes from the furries she scammed or whatever.

If there were only three categories, but even a body type chart has like 8 options. I'd put it like this:

Skeletal
Skinny
Petite
Average
Pear-shaped
Pudgy
Curvy
Skinny With Assets
Hourglass
Voluptuous
Chubby
Thicc
Full-figured
Fat
BBW
Obese

I'd put her between Hourglass and Thicc, but not over or under.

Of course you would. Can't admit you love fat chicks with massive saggy tits, right? Gotta invent a whole list of different bodysizes and figures instead.

&Yet you wouldn't say pizza is 100% dairy.

You do not study facts– you use facts to study.

There are no exceptions to facts, user.

You use studies to acquire observations.
Observations are inherently not facts.

I'm not claiming an exception I'm stating that there is no rule.

There's no "exception to the rule" because there's not a rule here.

Tall asian is based on opinion not fact. 'What's tall to me is short to you.'

You're stating that a fact can't be dismissed when it can. It's a matter of choice.

Everything that isn't a fact or is a fact can be dismissed. That's the denial of choice, again, user.

You're stating that someone who is politcally-right oriented doesn't have a choice in what they believe in again.

You still have yet to post one fact.

Tell me ONE thing that will be true always user.

@

Wow soyboy is still going on about this shit? You should really stop arguing here and start thinking about how you're going to come out to your parents dude.

Respond now, pls. I'm srs user

It's less than 2 minutes to post a single fact, user.

I don't need stats or essays.

If it's not a fact why the hell should I worship it like like it'll always be true.

I'm not afraid of "maybe" bullshit.

You, I can post another simulation of events.

The spartans are notorious alpha-males who generally were attracted to males & women with flatter chests.

This is (me)

But not ALL spartans were attracted to women with faltter chest.

Because they HAD A CHOICE

loli/hebe with big tits is best

I have a feeling I'll see a post minutes from now and it'll be someone trying to spoon-feed me more horseshit.

(ne again)

&btw, fuck the left too.

They also always pretend they don't have a choice too.

Hear, hear!

(me one last time)

I'm leaving the thread, bye anons.

*closes tab*

you guys should be fucking banned! fucking pedos can never keep their own shit in their own fucking thread. MODS/VOLS YOU FUCKING SUCK

...

...

hm
shes kinda ok, even though shes kinda a chub

..Easy 20% returns per day, just join the /biz/ group:

discord gg/zz7unwD

add DOT here→ .gg/zz

kucoin.com/#/?r=7Rt8wu
binance.com/?ref=12826625

No you do not arbitrarily define alpha and beta males. The alpha and beta description has its origin in the animal kingdom. Which means the description in it self is very clear. The only thing you "define" is what qualities makes an alphamale and alphamale, and that is usually through dominance and aquisition of females.
You can describe an alphamale as sean connery or rich piana that would be a cultural factor whereas in the animal kingdom the alphamale usually is the biggest gorilla.

But children have small tits and flat chests.

i personally prefer big tits and DFC. but then again i am a non-exclusive pedophile anyway.

But i do believe there is a solution to those of us who love both!! OPPAI LOLI!!!

This word salad is nonsense. What if you observe a fact? Wouldn't your observation then be a fact? You're trying to create this bizarre nonsensical separation while simultaneously asserting ideas you don't like are constructs. It's pure soylogic.

...

Low effort projection.

I have a better solution for you since the muricans have a rather magical definition of a pedophile.

That backs up the data that men who prefer small chests are less likely to be straight.

Makes no sense since the spartans lived in "spartanic" environments, men that live in spartanic environments like fuller women. Fag.

Spartans are a tiny fraction of the male population. You could just as easily pick vikings and demonstrate the opposite. It's just cherry-picking.

This may come as a shock to you user, but having sex with little boys is gay. How many squats you do and how shiny your abs are has no effect on the sexuality of your Deep Dark Fantasies.

yeah we americans are really screwed up with our definition of what a pedophile is.

The Spartans were not bisexual, and they were not pedophiles. Some of you have been watching too much of the mainstream media.

Fucking other men while being heterosexual is most likely a prison/instinct/fighting driven dominance thing, i would assume that occurs in men in certain environments.

I have that shit from a forum that discussed the "legal loophole" of pic related cunt that claimed to be 17 and one guy replyed "hehe pedos defend their pedophilia" even though the girl was 19 and looks more feminine than 99,9% of all females.

females are definitely changing. Years ago when i was a teen it was rare to see a teenage girl with more then a C cup. now most teen girls have a D cup. Its somewhat unsettling, since i have underage cousins and i want to protect them.

I dont watch any mainstream media at all other than hollywood tv series like daredevil, vikings, blacklist etc. What i really hate about daredevil however is that aweful overt morality.
But other than that the mainstream media pushes stuff in a certain direction a bit harder, just like the shieldmaidens in vikings, it has a true core but is a bit blown up.

Women are really evil,i assume their develish nature comes a bit earlier than in boys.

Friendly reminder: if you prefer large tits, you are probably a cuck whos attracted to women that have been bred by other men. Let's go over some facts.

-womens breast grow larger when they are pregnant

source: sex education

part of the reason why the porn industry is full of women with either naturally big breast or breast implants is to condition people into lusting after women that have been bred by another man

the reason why there is massive over reaction to topics concerning pedophilia, and why society conflates child sex abuse and pedophilia is to brainwash men into not being attracted to young women by making it taboo for men to pursue relationships with young virginal women of age.

this is a feminsit ploy to make sure their used up vaginas that they spend their whole lives battering with are still worth something when they are old, fat, and have born numerous children to multiple fathers

My nigga

There are several problems with this post. For starters, that's not how pregnancy works.

Breasts grow as a result of puberty to demonstrate sexual maturity. Full stop. Breasts lactate as a result of pregnancy, but this stops as soon as she stops nursing. Breast growth from puberty doesn't go away on it's own. So right off the bat your assumption is incorrect, breasts don't show she's been bred, they show she's ready to breed.

The second half of your post abandons this premise and predictably devolves into pedobabble.

Pic 1 and 4 arent really good examples because their tits are fake.

I'd have to see the girl in the first pic topless to be certain (could be the top creating the cleavage, Elvira's tits are natural, her dress creates the incredible cleavage) but the fourth one is definitely natural.

...

How old was this child molestation victim?

I have a near perfect natural tit radar, the only one that fooled my were yurizan beltran and eva notty.

Out of hundrets of thousands of tits.

hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/conditions/breast_health/normal_breast_development_and_changes_85,P00151

babycenter.com/0_breast-changes-during-pregnancy_262.bc

yes it is

if you dont understand this basic knowledge that the average school kids understands you are a literal retard

i dont disagree with you there

but you are moving the goal posts

you claimed in your OP that liking large breasts is best and now you are saying that having breasts of any size is okay

im saying that

small / normal sized breasts - healthy

large breast - woman has either glandular problems, is fat, or has more than likely been bred by another man, which also typically makes them fat

big titties, small titties, I like 'em all.

there is absolutely nothing wrong with itty bitty titties

She got married and had a kid, she's not coming back.

The pubic hair of the first girl looks like hairy dick.

I dont like itty bitty titties unlike she is called shakira and can move a shewolf.

youtube.com/watch?v=booKP974B0k

You linked for information about how breasts grow through lactation during pregnancy, but left out that they deflate when nursing stops. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume stupidity on your part rather than malice.

What you're describing is not breast growth, it's swelling from lactation. This is akin to asserting if you have an allergic reaction on your dick the swelling counts as dick growth.

None of what you're saying effects the studies which show unequivocally that men who prefer smaller breasts are more likely to be gay, bi, low-testosterone cucks who don't want kids.

Any random busty 14 year old posted, or any woman with large natural breasts who has never had a kid in and of herself disproves your every twisted claim. Please stop being stupid user.

Do you have a source for that study, would wonder if that has strong correlation or a correlation that is tied to other stuff.
Because i think men that like small tits are usually betas/peacocks, if personality is voided in the equation of attraction, except in cases of fetishism of ass legs feet etc.

Where can you go for this kind of stuff nowadays since 8ch don't allow this kind of extremely degenerate content

Careful there with such mass accusations. I don't ever watch TV or movies, and hardly even play video games newer than 1992. Pic is game I was playing today, a breakout clone for Atari 800. Yeah it has a funny name, but it's way better than they Arkanoid port.
Also when I was a teenager (1980's) there was no easy Internet access. I didn't get brainwashed to like big tits by anybody. I wasn't even allowed to watch TV back then, which is probably why I don't give a shit about it now.

My earliest computergame was zelda and i also found an exploit in the hometown where you could go through all the levels linearly like pages and meet the final boss.
You had to go to the shore walk a certain route back and then there was a house you had to go through in a certain angle. I wonder if that was a bug. I wonder if anyone else found that bug other than me.

youtube.com/watch?v=eetOraDytC4

I remembered it a bit different but it was the same house.

except larger and / or saggier tits are common for women post pregnancy

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15499956

also women are also fatter after pregnancy

medicaldaily.com/pregnancy-weight-gain-most-women-dont-lose-weight-after-birth-because-they-gain-too-313724

outliers arent proof of a trend

there are women out there who could beat your neckbeard ass in a fight, but thats doesnt mean that women are stronger physically than men

none of the studies you provide say this

i wouldnt normally go grammar nazi on someone, but anyone with any amount of scientific training knows how to properly use "effect" and "affect"

Duh, like I said. Lactation, then they're deflated afterwards. This isn't growth.

That's just it though, they're not anomalies. You're being patently absurd. Humans are the only mammals that have mammary glands which remain swollen when not producing milk. That's their entire purpose, to demonstrate sexual maturity and readiness to mate.

You just keep coming back and repeating the same thing over and over as if one of these times I'm going to magically forget you're referring to lactation which is a completely separate phenomenon. Again, this is like someone telling you bee stings won't make you taller, and you linking to a description of the effects of swelling from bee stings.

Put it another way. If someone claimed they had a balloon that would thicken and become larger developing more rubber, would it be safe to call them a liar if their demonstration of this was just expanding the balloon with water?

Female udders i mean breasts could become a lot bigger if the pregnancy offsets a ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16770587.

Gigangomastia is a hormonal disorder, it can occur without a pregnancy. It's an extremely rare disorder. I knew a girl with a prolactinoma brain tumor which caused her breasts to grow and her to lactate at 14. She was DD at 16 as a result.

There's also virginal breast hypertrophy, which again is defined by being triggered in young girls who have not had kids. Pregnancy causes lactation, not breast growth.

conveniently ignoring that it says "enlargement and loss of firmness"

enlargement is growth

[citation needed]

also that large implies uncommonly big in size, otherwise it would be normal size

which in of itself could be an argument to show the flaws in your logic present in your OP - your logic being: -

my argument is that large breasts are typical of bred women, and so an attraction to large breasts is linked to an attraction to already bred women so referring to changes that happen to a women when she has been bred (such as lactation) isnt separate from my argument

its worth pointing out that you havent actually refuted my argument, and are just vaguely making inaccurate observations about it

except the breasts during pregnancy arent just an inanimate empty sack that is being filled with a liquid, they are living tissue which is undergoing structural changes

from hormones by a W Norman, H L Henry

OP is either a butt hurt ham planet feminist, an epic tier white knight or happy merchant

this shit reeks of "beautiful at any size" fat acceptance

as an example here , its a typical call for feminists to deplore anyone who is not willing to prostrate themselves in order to imbibe from the holy grail (vagina)

You're going further and further up your ass with every post dude.

Like I've explained to you over and over and over and over and over again but you're so stupid you require it be repeated yet again, the point of what was highlighted was the word "WERE" as in past-tense, temporary. Growth isn't temporary you fucking imbecile. It's lactation. Do you fucking understand this or are you just going to repeat this again for the eight fucking time and pretend it's an argument? Pretend you're so fucking stupid you don't understand the difference between growth and lactation. Holy FUCK how are you this stupid?

How about the first and second post you illiterate mouthbreathing fuckwit? If it was an anomaly, the average bra size wouldn't be DD. Do you get that? Do you get what the word AVERAGE fucking means? Why don't you try actually reading the thread instead of flapping your fucking gums and repeating the same dumb shit over and over?

You finding it abnormal does not make it abnormal asshat. It doesn't impair their survival, their purpose is mate attraction. This is like arguing peacock feathers prevent are abnormal because they make them easy to spot. They aid in mate selection, men who want kids prefer larger breasts. Duh.

Then your argument is verifiably wrong, has already been refuted a dozen times over. There is no permanent growth resulting from pregnancy, you're referring (over and over like an autistic parrot) to lactation. I could google image search "woman with _ kids" and find you plenty of small-chested women. I could link you to 004b's gallery showing lots of women with huge breasts who haven't had kids and women who have had kids and don't have large breasts. There is no correlation. You've created a false connection that exists entirely INSIDE YOUR ASS. But you're just going to come back and repeat it again, right? You're probably the same faggot that kept asserting a woman with an hourglass figure was fat.

THE BREASTS GROW INDEPENDENT OF PREGNANCY. LACTATION IS NOT GROWTH. YOUR ARGUMENT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY REFUTED YOU FUCKING RETARD.

Pure projection. As was already pointed out, soyboys are the ones with a stated preference for small tits. Soyboys are the ones likely to identify as feminists. It's feminists that have flooded the market with flat-chested female protagonists (which always flop because the majority of the market does not respond to it.)

"were" doesnt imply temporary

just because something was something in the past doesnt mean it isnt still now. the study was conducted in the past so it couldnt be written as if it was present. there is nothing to say that those womens arent as big now, if not bigger than they were

it can be, people shrink with old age for example

and you are still going on with your idea that breast growth during pregnancy is temporary when i have shown that it isnt. you are either troll or retarded, you accuse me of repetition but if you are carrying on being retarded then all you are going to hear is "stop being retarded".

youre right, it being abnormal makes it abnormal

my argument doesnt hinge on this being true or false, it may interest you that there are some connections with larger breasts and an increased risk of cancer in addition to back problems etc that women with big breasts experience.

this isnt inconsistent with my argument. women with large breasts are likely to be women that have been bred. women that have been bred have been proven by being bred that they are good at breeding. therefore anyone interested in breeding would be interested in breeding a woman that had already been bred

i have quoted a scientific article stating otherwise and all you offer me is contradiction.

strawman - my argument isnt "lactation is growth", so you have refuted nothing

way to prove me wrong bro

dude the women you just posted are basically fictional so its hard to count them as feminist propaganda. While I can and will admit that feminism plays a large role in a number of female roles in TV now, most of the actresses who play roles in front of a camera are D cups. The clothing makes their tits look smaller. But at the end of the day no one gives a damn about fictional characters and they really arne't influenced by them that much.

Pussy is pussy, titties are titties. Some like them small, some like them big. But i have never seen any guy turn down a decent woman with big tits. At the end of the day if the woman gets the guy whether her tits are big or small that's all that matters to the woman. In all truth this whole debate cane be rendered moot by the fact that no matter how big or small the woman's tits are if you can't land her, or she isn't worth trying to hook up with then the size of her tits don't matter.

This is terrible, but it's a low I must admit I have sunken too in a moment of desperation.
Interesting experience though as she asked me to pee in her butt, gotta admit I did not expect that.

We need to acutally research how tits grow naturally bigger and i think a clue is virginal gigantomastia, possibly estrogen receptors ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles./PMC5351470/. Seems to be hypersensivity.
I wonder if the estrogen receptors work like dopamine receptors which you can work and have a titmeat paradise.

That's exactly what it means because it means it STOPPED. If it stopped, it was temporary. If it stopped, it wasn't permanent. If it wasn't permanent, it wasn't growth. how many ways need this be spelled out to you?

That's exactly what it means. It would have just said something like "induced breast growth" or "permanent changes" or something other than "it went away after nursing stopped".

More moving goal posts. Swelling =/= growth.

No, you have not. You just repeat yourself. Give me a qualitative standard. I've shown you countless girls who have huge natural breasts and have never been pregnant, regardless of anything else this alone proves your entire assertion is horse shit. Breasts grow as a result of puberty, fucking period. You lost, be a big boy and deal with it.

I accept your admission of error.

And you haven't established it as abnormal. A second admission, look at you being all grown up!

You have no argument. You just move goalposts and repeat yourself and ignore every single fact which has refuted your claims.

Okay, don't want to listen to reason and obvious fact from me? I'll just quote some experts, asshat:

pregnancytips.org/pregnancy/pregnancy-health/does-pregnancy-increase-breast-size-permanently/

babble.com/body-mind/do-breasts-always-shrink-after-pregnancy-and-breastfeeding/

todaysparent.com/baby/from-b-to-double-d-and-back-again/

Is that enough, or are you so painfully stupid you need more people telling you what a complete fucking retard you are?

It's the facts that have proven you wrong. Spam all you like, it won't make you less of a SOYBOY. Factually proven, if you prefer small tits you are a faggot soyboy low t beta cuck serving the feminist agenda and no amount of whining or projection will ever change this.

dude seriously it sounds to me like you're trying to make up for something now. Maybe i need to read all these articles that you posted but i get the feeling that they are just bullshit.

This makes no sense, of course what feminists push out as propaganda isn't real, they're real actresses and they really do choose flat women specifically because feminists hate tits.

This is the problem. The average woman is 5'4 with DD breasts, but in hollywood the average is 5'10 with B or smaller. This is due to hiring preferences of feminists and homosexuals.

This has nothing to do with anything and basically means nothing. The point was to demonstrate that the assertion that "promoting big tits is feminist" is false, because the feminists promote small tits and de-sexed masculine women. If you want to have a discussion about how effective it is, go have it with yourself as that was never at issue.

There are a number of other reasons it does matter, but what's at issue here is who likes which breasts, and nothing you've said has refuted what studies have found. Alphas like big tits, betas like small ones. Alphas want kids, betas don't. This isn't opinion, this is fact.

I'm just sick of soyboys, feminists and trannies trying to portray androgynous male-looking bodies as the gold standard in beauty when the majority does not like that.

...

young tits are best tits tbh

Post counts by user ID:

07ea9c: 97 (35.93%)

The women of Hollywood are such a small percentage of the population that they may as well be non-existent. If you are using Hollywood and statistics to somehow claim that liking small tits is beta is a fallacy. Anecdotal evidence totally destroys your arguments. Go outside some time.

Where are all these soyboys and feminist overrunning the entertainment industry? Especially when you watch any of the Hollywood awards shows you notice that most of the directors are men. It seems to me that most of Hollywood is run by older former Alpha males. So this so-called conspiracy about breast size indicating weather you are a beta or alpha in the end is just foolish.

Let me give you a anecdote to help destroy your argument. I have three female cousins. They are all sisters. The eldest is 33 and she is so flat chested that she doesn't need to wear a bra ever. But she has three kids and is currently dating a Alpha male in his forties. the second sister, who is 28, is a D cup, she has only one child and can barely keep a man. But currently she is dating a 35 year old guy who is most definitely alpha, and fucking jerk who doesn't help her pay the rent even though he makes 50,000 dollars a year. And finally the youngest sister is 23 and she is barely a D cup, but she can never get any guy to pay her any attention because she behaves so badly in many ways. Just looking at my own family i can totally see that your argument falls flat.

I'm genuinely baffled by how you can reply to a thread you didn't read. No, that's an entirely separate discussion. Did you look at the second image? The basis for the assertions are these studies linked in the SECOND POST:

Men who prefer smaller breasts have low testosterone, no desire to reproduce, fear competition and see themselves as undeserving of a healthy, functioning woman. They also describe themselves as more sexually fluid, seeing sex with men or trannies as an option. Psychologists point out these men tend to have had one crush early in school, and fixated on her (literally child) body as perfection. You never grew up or emotionally matured. Sources:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22722955

researchgate.net/publication/18778651_Correlates_of_heterosexual_somatic_preference

To quote psychologist Stuart Fischoff:

"Men who like small-breasted women are often seeking a more submissive, non-threatening partner. Also, you may get the psychological hint that she’s not trying to compete with other women who have larger breasts, and therefore she’ll be loyal to you. Or maybe the very first girl you had a crush on had small breasts, and if she constructed your earliest example of what’s sexy, her memory may still lead you to find small-breasted women exciting."

Come fucking on

I'm just going to quote this single line of text and emphasis it to let it sink in how profoundly stupid it is.

First pic is acutally really interesting, i really like that style and her face.

If these were my fat greasy waifus (especially the second one) I'd still be happy just to have a waifu that loved my dick and dressing up like my favorite cartoon characters.

When did Ashley J get so THICC

Boobs are fake though :(.

She's a pretty prolific cosplayer, I haven't seen any evidence her boobs are fake.

You can tell by the shape