Using imaging and electronics that arent limited for the public by international law at high frequencies, people are actually running around you spying on you in virtual reality, looking through your walls, and hacking into your computers using this law:
Title 47, Part 15 (47 CFR 15) is an oft-quoted part of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules and regulations regarding unlicensed transmissions. It is a part of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and regulates everything from spurious emissions to unlicensed low-power broadcasting. Nearly every electronics device sold inside the United States radiates unintentional emissions, and must be reviewed to comply with Part 15 before it can be advertised or sold in the US market.
This means your electronics, whether its in your brain or in your computer, must accept harassment via satellite or from some other federal agency that is brilliant (5th grader level) to figure and have the budget to interact with this level of technology.
Let me tell you folks, infrared has much higher bandwidth then your 5ghz internet and its only incapable because of the artificial limitations set on it by the international authorities.
This law must be revoked for the protection of the people of the United States of America against global forces who wish to prey on its people.
This is taken from another individual. 13 down vote favorite 1
I've googled around a bit and here are the interpretations I've found in non-authoritative sources:
that the device is unable to filter out interference caused by other certified equipment that if there is interference, the device must not "complain" about it (whatever that means) that if there is interference and your device fails to work, you must not complain about it (i.e. you cannot sue for failure to perform the function) that if there is interference, the device can't do anything about it (though I can't think what it possibly could do about this other than actively seek out the source and shut it down, sci-fi style) that the device is actually required to work correctly regardless of any interference
The only intention of this law is to allow harassment and political assassination. If you'd like to give examples of how its been used other wise in the case of disabling an actual instrument that might cause interference in an emergency please give an example. '
Brayden Collins
This allows unlimited access to your computer devices and any programming to any electronics that you own so that they may be dysfunctional or act illegally under your name.
Tyler Anderson
schizophrenia is a hard disease to cope with, good luck OP
Logan Morgan
Since the electronics also do not report its being messed with it allows many agencies working under this authority the free agency to not only spy on your communications but to completely render any of your electronics useless, politically discredit you by causing cruel and unusual punishment and dysfunction, and the free will to sabotage any corporation or company.
Justin James
What part of this is schizophrenia?
You'll be hard pressed to question me.
Christopher Johnson
And also actual limitations set on it by the laws of physics. Wifi already has shit enough range and penetration, but the near-visible spectrum would be unusable.
Ryan Sanders
Which laws? Most of the limitations are because of the equipment being used.
Asher Flores
You probably don't want to debate physics with someone who can see through solid objects.
Jayden Johnson
I study law and what you've said is mostly garbled nonsense (albeit I don't know much about US law specifically), leading me to believe you're batshit insane.
Brody Mitchell
What I stated is directly from US law and printed directly on most US electronics.
Owen Smith
...
Cameron Price
I don't see anything resembling the actual text of any law, statutory or otherwise, in this thread.
Wyatt Cruz
This may include 'undesired illegal' operation as well.
Isaiah Sanders
§ 15.19 Labeling requirements.
(a) In addition to the requirements in part 2 of this chapter, a device subject to certification, or Supplier's Declaration of Conformity shall be labeled as follows:
(1) Receivers associated with the operation of a licensed radio service, e.g., FM broadcast under part 73 of this chapter, land mobile operation under part 90 of this chapter, etc., shall bear the following statement in a conspicuous location on the device:
This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the condition that this device does not cause harmful interference.
(2) A stand-alone cable input selector switch, shall bear the following statement in a conspicuous location on the device:
This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules for use with cable television service.
(3) All other devices shall bear the following statement in a conspicuous location on the device:
This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.
(4) Where a device is constructed in two or more sections connected by wires and marketed together, the statement specified under paragraph (a) of this section is required to be affixed only to the main control unit.
(5) When the device is so small or for such use that it is impracticable to label it with the statement specified under paragraph (a) of this section in a font that is four-point or larger, and the device does not have a display that can show electronic labeling, then the information required by this paragraph shall be placed in the user manual and must also either be placed on the device packaging or on a removable label attached to the device.
Evan Ortiz
(b)-(c) [Reserved]
(d) Consumer electronics TV receiving devices, including TV receivers, videocassette recorders, and similar devices, that incorporate features intended to be used with cable television service, but do not fully comply with the technical standards for cable ready equipment set forth in § 15.118, shall not be marketed with terminology that describes the device as “cable ready” or “cable compatible,” or that otherwise conveys the impression that the device is fully compatible with cable service. Factual statements about the various features of a device that are intended for use with cable service or the quality of such features are acceptable so long as such statements do not imply that the device is fully compatible with cable service. Statements relating to product features are generally acceptable where they are limited to one or more specific features of a device, rather than the device as a whole. This requirement applies to consumer TV receivers, videocassette recorders and similar devices manufactured or imported for sale in this country on or after October 31, 1994. [ 54 FR 17714, Apr. 25, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 25341, May 16, 1994; 61 FR 18509, Apr. 26, 1996; 61 FR 31048, June 19, 1996; 62 FR 41881, Aug. 4, 1997; 63 FR 36602, July 7, 1998; 65 FR 64391, Oct. 27, 2000; 68 FR 66733, Nov. 28, 2003; 68 FR 68545, Dec. 9, 2003; 82 FR 50830, Nov. 2, 2017]
Gabriel Ortiz
Should I spam the other 19 parts of this law or are you going to keep wasting my time?
Asher Edwards
No, that's fine. I'd say the second condition is related more to things like TV signal, air radio traffic and the like, meaning you can't successfully sue whoever is emitting the signal that is interfering with your device to make them stop, because their signal is more important.
It most likely isn't a back door for the government to be able to legally control your phone through interference - note that it's the device that must accept interference and not its owner/operator. Other checks that should prevent this kind of action from the state should be in your constitution, which I haven't read.
Gavin Jones
I'm telling you as a fact its being used for sabotage and electronic harassment. Its not just government entities – its international agencies that get the go ahead to do business and spam our country with their chain business.
Benjamin Thompson
The FCC is public enemy number one. They are the portal to most of the evil and the insanity that most excuse as satanic torture.
They need to be held for their crimes against humanity and violently taken apart.
Jack Ward
I mean full on raid every building they have, seize every asset, arrest every person, completely halt everything they're doing and see who flips their shit.
Ian Rodriguez
As far as I can tell this agency has been taken over by something international and is being influenced or coerced by a new weapon of war. It needs to be shut down simultaneously.
Jayden Perry
The FCC is the most vulnerable target if its attacked simultaneously.
Kayden Parker
youtube.com/watch?v=EcWbuBPNtPw This is 1990s propoganda about the sort of technology that is being used and hidden by the FCC under the guise of satanism.
Its military technology from the 1960s that people might identify as 'the voice of God'.
Jack Cook
The technology is now ran out of popular and powerful airbases that have since been shut down. There are about 70 since the 80s.
Daniel Green
Since the airbases have been 'shut down' they are mostly ran under international authority or 'publicly' ran.
Anthony Stewart
Most of the incidents in this video described have been caused by nanotechnology and the ability to electro stimulate the brain in various areas while sending discrete and secretive communications that only one individual can hear.
Kayden Allen
Im waiting for any sort of 'you're crazy' comment, I'll drop every bit of information you need.
Camden Jenkins
Exorcism worked because the guys using the weapon thought the ritual was so fucking hilarious that theyd let it work and make them think it did a thing. They probably did it more than once since it was a remote technology.
Thats what im guessing.
Excorcism doesn't actually work.
Nicholas Rivera
You've been throwing around serious claims with nothing to back them up the whole time, let's see some proof on any of this
James Diaz
You need to ask for what you dont understand.
Dominic Jones
This is not surprising. Wikileaks revealed that the Cunts IA was already implanting backdoors into iPhones in 2009, to allow full control of the phones at will.
All the Cunts IA and other shitmason peeping toms will try to play down the real threat you raised.
Jackson Young
Im sorry what am I backing up?
Nathan Watson
Yea they want you to think its some program they have to load on your phone or something. Its actually apart of the hardware that's accessible through radio interception.
Even if you have awesome security there's multiple methods of attack and imaging to phreak out the password for your phone.
When the next 5 ghz communication line becomes more popular we will see faster processors. Their radio signals have to be able to be spied on first before they are made public.
Fuck the FCC.
James Wood
We could have 70ghz processor already using infrared and special cooling if it wasnt for the freaking slave drivers at the FCC.
Dylan Kelly
1) The provision that devices must accept interference even if it causes unwanted behaviour is somehow being used for sabotage and "electronic harassment" 2) Private companies ("international agencies") also do this and with the US govt's permission 3) "International agencies" use this sabotage and "electronic harassment" to found chain businesses/franchises in the US
Brody Fisher
So you want an explicit example where someone's electronics is behaving weirdly, and does not have to signal it, and led to sabotage?
The man that murdered this guy also attempted to kill another man who is living witness to 1). He is also the only living witness to tactics. It happened one street over on 3rd street.
He is waiting for the right moment to present himself to the court unknown to the judge because he is being held from testimony due to deliberate obstruction of justice (vagueness intentional but this is necessary at the moment).
Jonathan Perry
2) Comes along with 1). You wont get 2) without 1).
CHILD PORNOGRPAHY
Liam Watson
...
Owen Moore
I don't know about you guys, but I've seen about 30,000 people drop from bullets. I'd know if someone died before emptying my entire clip and he was wielding just a butter knife.
Ethan Perry
As a matter of fact im pretty sure any retard would know because you couldnt fire off a semi automatic weapon fast enough not to figure out you killed the person.
That's why there were so many bullet holes in the walls flying through the neighbors apartments. Its called shitty overkill.
Ryder Cook
I don't see how any of that is relevant.
William Davis
The first first half of bullets may have had a mix of hit and miss, the others were on target. The intent was to kill the dude who was raging hard with his butterknife.
Motherfucker was activated.
Carter Russell
Its because the murder was used to create a scenario where the department had to implement the use of body cameras.
The murder was caused by a radio weapon that causes brain stimulation thats controlled by the FCC. It uses a bandwidth and radiofrequency thats protected.
Ryder King
The first person would've been the excuse for the body cameras but they had to poison and use a second victim.
Blake Sullivan
The first victim was lucky enough to have the protection of camera around – but that isnt enough to protect you from what something looks like. Camera doesn't always capture sound – so a conversation doesn't always get captured.
What may look like a perp running from the police may actually be a set up because the police said some nonsense and scared the person of interest away.
Chase Howard
The second victim didnt have either of those things and got blasted in the hallway. There is no doubt that would've happened to the first person since the officer tried to create a situation where the suspect's reaction would give the officer an opportunity for a fatal conclusion.
I mean he fucking murdered someone one street down the road figure it out
Blake Richardson
Do I have to fucking go down there and burn out his eyes myself and carve my symbol into his fucking head before you people figure it out?
Lucas Roberts
I am running out of patience with you people. I do not want to publicly involve myself with this case or I'm going to have to castrate this man in public.
Evan Carter
The officer claims the man "rapidly and aggressively advanced on (the officers) swinging his arms in a windmill fashion as he ran toward them."
The other man which has yet to been relieved was claimed to have come to "murder all his friends in chico" despite having shown up bringing gifts and no weapons.
Dominic Collins
"Medics and firefighters had originally arrived at the apartment to address Desmond, who was dancing in the living room in a "trance-like state" and wearing headphones and sunglasses, Ramsey said Thursday. Desmond would not leave with the medics, and "suddenly became animated with punches and swings of his arms and hands," according to Ramsey, when medics attempted to touch him. Firefighters then called for police."
