As the republicans won a propaganda victory, the nationalist advance continued on the ground...

So let me get this straight: in the middle of Fascist advancement and Republican collapse anarchists decide to revolt, split the anti-Fascist forces, throw the Republic into chaos with the support of a Trot organization (which Trotsky himself didn't support), help Franco win and when they get righteously BTFO, they call it "betrayal" for subsequent generations? This is Bush "they hate our freedoms"-tier.

And what exactly did they expect? That if the Republic didn't destroy them Franco would be like "eh, those are cool" and let them have parts of Spain? I'm flabbergasted.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XN5TbqzxQBg&list=PLLyvTdCuoQLoqizfghACoh1EDMBXRhSHV&index=5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Days
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

First of all the P.O.U.M were NOT Trots. Second, the communists (Stalinist) who where in cahoots with the Republican government throughout the entire war tried to hinder the revolution occurring in Catalonia. For example, to my knowledge they basically refused to work with the organizations controlling the region. It got to a point were the tankies essentially invaded the region to "restore order" which in turn had the entire Republican side weakened. The documentary on the Spanish Civil War gives a good outline on what went down with the revolution.

youtube.com/watch?v=XN5TbqzxQBg&list=PLLyvTdCuoQLoqizfghACoh1EDMBXRhSHV&index=5

I recommend this book, for an anarchist account of the revolution.

The Anarcho-Trotskyite POUM and Francoists were both anti-communist reactionaries.

Revolutionary communists side with neither in this situation.

You forgot to add that, after the nationalists won, anarchists reported communists to them.

Of course, they (communists) all got shot and were buried in mass graves.

who attacked the telephone exchange?

Can someone tell me about this event?

ITT:
Anarkids don't like the fact that too much Idealism is bad for Materialism.

If the material conditions say "let's talk about anarchy another day" and you say "No, fighting Stalin and liberal democracy is more important", you're a traitor or an idiot.

Same thing happened with the black army.

[citation needed]

Get fucked, red fascist traitors.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Days

Tankies are fascists with different banners.

Anarchobabbies not even once

-I want to eat burgers!
-But we only have brocoli…
-*starves*

ANARKID LOGIC!

Usually "centralized coordinated war efforts" are thrown out the window the second you side with liberals to crack down on worker-ownership and attack your allies.

Or maybe you make burgers instead of forcing people to eat broccoli or you will fucking kill them.

You guys are both fags.
t. Mutualist who understands dialectics

Then we eat broccoli while we figure out how to improve burger production?
Maybe we can trust burger production to an incompetent centralized bureaucracy.

STARVATION IT IS I GUESS!!!

Franco is a better alternative to liberal democracy
t. Anarkid.

Hey guise, vanguard parties have never oppressed people or betrayed the ideals of the revolution or anything. We'll get to communism after another purge and some deals with bourgeois countries.
t. ankies

It's better to have a Fascist Dictator for 40 years than unite temporarily and sort it out afterwards.

t. anarkidies.

Again, get fucked, red fascist.
We didn't break the unity.

LOL
I'm sure the party elites will just respect the body politic and not enrich themselves at everyone else's expense.

So we agree that the unity was broken. Now we have to agree on who broke it. .. Kidding! Agreeing in that is more than enough.


Well… If you have enough manpower you could then fight the tankies.. .. IF you have enough… Or was it that not enough people believe in anarchism and you have to be edgy or else you have no point?

Apparently the tankies didn't have enough manpower in Spain, m8.

We are 10, they are 11, but we can still beat them… And then we are 7 cause 3 anarkids said "I want it my way" and we get beaten.

I wonder why….

You know what is edgy?
Adhering to an ideology associated with the mass-murder of millions.
Marxism isn't going anywhere. It'll never become big again.
We've learned from the past and now know you're even more dangerous to socialism than fascists.

Because Anarchists know not to trust ML tyrannical scum. I'm not even an Anarchist but I have more respect for them than tankie babby killers.

The CNT/FAI was the largest group participating in the civil war. Reducing us to seven was stalinist agression and seizure of worker-owned industry.

Show me an ideology that did not kill a shitload of people, and I will show you an ideology that never had control over shit.

The Anarchists there were bassicly protofascists and were working with franco to try to disrupt the verry succefull operations of the Marxist Leninist fighters to Liberate spain from fascism. Never trust Anarchists they only want freedom from the state to become the state themselfs.

We're talking a difference in order of great magnitude here. Murder and political opression was systematic in Marxist systems, and that's why it was even worse that the fucking US. And don't get me wrong, the US is a fucking nightmare, but to support something even more authoritarian is the most edgy thing I could imagine.

I can agree to that. IF that is the case and Anarkids did nothin wrong.


Ghandi.. … Oh wait.. people still got killed… Yep. Not happening. Peacefull revolution is an oxymoron.

t. ankies

10/10, would get trolled again.

You see here *sniff* that the Stalinists throw aside all other concerns in the name of the big other. The big other in question is historical necessity, and so on.

lol, implying america was going to let a western euro country become anarchist during the cold war.
America was great friends with franco.

?