(((The Guardian))): "Next revolution will seek to overthrow privileges of nationhood"

Another intellectual rebellion, in which accepted realities became intolerable injustices, looks destined to take place this century

For the past several centuries, the world has experienced a sequence of intellectual revolutions against oppression of one sort or another. These rebellions operate in the minds of humans and are spread eventually to most of the world, not by war, which tends to involve multiple causes, but by language and communications technology. Ultimately, the ideas they advance, unlike the causes of war, become noncontroversial.

The next such revolution, likely to occur in the 21st century, will challenge the economic implications of the nation state. It will focus on the injustice that follows from the fact that, entirely by chance, some are born in poor countries and others in rich countries. As more people work for multinational firms and get to know more people from other countries, our sense of justice is being affected.

This is hardly unprecedented. In his book 1688: the First Modern Revolution, the historian Steven Pincus argues convincingly that the so-called Glorious Revolution is best thought of not in terms of the overthrow of a Catholic king by parliamentarians in England, but as the beginning of a worldwide revolution in justice. Don’t think battlefields. Think, instead, of the coffeehouses with free, shared newspapers that became popular around then – places for complex communications. Even as it happened, the Glorious Revolution clearly marked the beginning of a worldwide appreciation of the legitimacy of groups that do not share the “ideological unity” demanded by a strong king.

Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense, a bestseller in the 13 colonies when it was published in January 1776, marked another such revolution, which was not identical with the revolutionary war against Britain that began later that year (and had multiple causes). The reach of Common Sense is immeasurable, because it was not just sold but was also read aloud at churches and meetings. The idea that hereditary monarchs were somehow spiritually superior to the rest of us was decisively rejected. Most of the world today, including Britain, agrees.

The same could be said of the gradual abolition of slavery, which was mostly achieved not by war, but by an emerging popular recognition of its cruelty and injustice. The 1848 uprisings around Europe were substantially a protest against voting laws that limited voting to only a minority of men: property holders or aristocrats. Women’s suffrage followed soon after. In the 20th and 21st centuries, we have seen civil rights extended to racial and sexual minorities.

All of the past “justice revolutions” have stemmed from improved communications. Oppression thrives on distance, on not actually meeting or seeing the oppressed.

The next revolution will not abolish the consequences of place of birth, but the privileges of nationhood will be tempered. While the rise in anti-immigrant sentiment around the world seems to point in the opposite direction, the sense of injustice will be amplified as communications continue to grow. Ultimately, recognition of wrong will wreak big changes.

For now, this recognition faces strong competition from patriotic impulses, rooted in a social contract among nationals who have paid taxes over the years or performed military service to build or defend what they saw as exclusively theirs. Allowing unlimited immigration would seem to violate this contract.

(1/2)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/l7Fw7
resist.com/AReligionforAryans.htm
worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n87122630/
researchgate.net/profile/Virginia_Shiller/publications
jrbooksonline.com/pdfs/camp_of_the_saints.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Trust_Limited
youtube.com/watch?v=PSPTGTpzbiI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Clouscard
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincus_(surname)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Pincus
gen.lib.rus.ec/search.php?req=1688: The First Modern Revolution&open=0&res=25&view=simple&phrase=1&column=title
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

But the most important steps to address birthplace injustice probably will not target immigration. Instead, they will focus on fostering economic freedom.

In 1948, Paul A Samuelson’s “factor-price equalisation theorem” lucidly showed that under conditions of unlimited free trade without transportation costs (and with other idealised assumptions), market forces would equalise the prices of all factors of production, including the wage rate for any standardised kind of labour, around the world. In a perfect world, people don’t have to move to another country to get a higher wage. Ultimately, they need only be able to participate in producing output that is sold internationally.

As technology reduces the cost of transportation and communications to near the vanishing point, achieving this equalisation is increasingly feasible. But getting there requires removing old barriers and preventing the erection of new ones.

Recent free-trade agreements under discussion, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, have suffered setbacks as interest groups attempt to bend them to their own aims. But, ultimately, we need – and probably will get – even better such agreements.

To achieve factor-price equalisation, people need a stable base for a real lifetime career connected to a country in which they do not physically reside. We also need to protect the losers to foreign trade in our existing nation-states. Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) traces its roots in the US back to 1974. Canada experimented in 1995 with an Earnings Supplement Project. The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, started in 2006, has a tiny annual budget of €150m (£128m). US President Barack Obama has proposed to expand the TAA programme. But, so far, this has meant little more than experiments or proposals.

Ultimately, the next revolution will likely stem from daily interactions on computer monitors with foreigners whom we can see are intelligent, decent people – people who happen, through no choice of their own, to be living in poverty. This should lead to better trade agreements, which presuppose the eventual development of orders of magnitude more social insurance to protect people within a country during the transition to a more just global economy.

(2/2)

archive.fo/l7Fw7

Because nothing is more important than >muh GDP and the global economy, right goyim?

Except Israel, of course.

I hate the Jews so much

Top kek.

...

What an absurd viewpoint. It's not a matter of chance that an individual is born to his parents, and that his parents to their parents, etc.

(((they))) aren't even trying to hide it anymore.

MEMES
What the fuck is this dimension?

...

...

Millenials are divided between Holla Forumsacks and our derivative movements, lazy faggots who don't even know which side they're on, and far left SJW's.

And "global econocomy" is never even used for science, space exploration etc., it's for welfare and feeding worthless subhumans.

actually, it is.

where?

Yes, because everyone who lives near large groups of supposedly oppressed niggers actually loves them and recognises them as true equals – it's those damn isolationist middle-class whites who are pushing their rassis agendas.

in Europe. We are bringing all the subhumans to our continent to live off our prosperity.

Really? It's possible to be born to people who aren't your parents? A person does not exist before being conceived via sexual intercourse by their parents.

Please explain.

But those COUNTRIES aren't poor or rich by chance. And since they are made up of a SHARED CULTURE, which in turn is made up of INDIVIDUALS…. hmmmm my synapses are really firing away here.

Fuck you OP.

Does it include the state of Israel?

Fucking exactly.

It is chance but that is totally beside the point. This idea, that some countries are poor and others are rich and the implication that all of that is either through happenstance at best or outright theft i.e. colonialism, at worst will be the justification for the NWO and ultimately the Mark of the Beast. One global government run by ((())), one global currency, one global religion. It's all in Revelation, you know, right after Jesus called out the (((Synagogue of Satan))) for doing this exact thing.

Pretty laughable to be honest. The next "revolution" will be either islamic or reactionary in nature. Marxists still dont understand that the mid-60s was their peak, their ideology is dying out around the world.

you said humanity


well, where is my welfare? It's global after all :^)

I don't see how it could be argued that being born to people who are biologically your parents is a matter of "chance" unless you believe in the concept of a soul and think that souls are randomly assigned to pregnant women.

We really live in intersting times, and certain strategies will evolve. So if you are really redpilled you know what that means.

wewlad

this

karma

even if you do believe in souls, the IE idea is that your previous actions determine your current position

Interesting how in the middle of the article he lets it slip that it's not a revolution of the people, it's a "revolution" of powerful multinational corporations bribing, blackmailing, and otherwise pressuring nations into abandoning their social contract with their people so they can lower wages into nothing. No one wants this except the economic migrants, and they only want it because governments have been made to promise them gibs that are higher than the average wage + housing + food + free utilities etc. When this jew's wet dream comes about do you think those people will want to work for multinational, or work at all?

Destroying "national privilege" essentially means the only protections you will get will come through your employer, aka they own you now and if you ever leave them without another job you're fucked. It also means that small businesses are deader than ever because unlimited free trade + whatever regulations these multinationals cook up (and already have cooked up) will essentially cripple them and leave them free to be bought up or simply allowed to fail. Not to mention all the demographic problems that are already cropping up will only get worse.

But no it's all about those nice poor foreigners, who will totally convince us to give up all our rights and all benefits of our national citizenship to them because their country is a fucking garbage heap. Totally wasn't their fault though, magic dirt made their country poor there was nothing they could do, and once they get to your country they'll suddenly have all the attributes that made your country successful because you have better magic dirt there! Never mind all the killings and rapings, the whole sections of town that you can no longer enter without legitimately fearing for your life, the coffee shop dwelling arabs who demand you both bow down to their culture and work to support them and their families so they don't have to. Those people are in the real world, and it's the nice foreigners over the computer screens who you should really be paying attention to.

/rant

Tell that to the white children killed in the past at times of war and unable to immigrate to other countries.

no

If anything, those children are reborn into rich Trump-like families while the people who killed them (if of their own volition) are reborn into niggers

fuck off

Its a simple concept.

No boarders no barriers makes everything equalize to the lowest common denominator.

If you take shit water and clean water, and mix them together you get a little less shit water.

The revolution is not in open boarders, the revolution will be in Robot labor, 3d printed housing, and vertical farming, and cold fusion.

The only reason they want open boarders is so they can drop a bio weapon on us and have is spread anywhere and everywhere without stopping.

?
Metempsychosis is a standard feature in Indo-European beliefs

Pretty much.

You really must admire the absolute chutzpah of this kike fuck in arguing that "free trade agreements" practically drafted by multinational conglomerates really are for the dumb goyim's benefit. And if they don't, well, that just means we need to replace it was a better free trade treaty!


But honestly at the end of the day it's just the usual (((globalist shill))) nonsense peddled by kikes in the "1%" and their cheerleaders in various think tanks and NGOs, aka "First Worlders need to be punished for their disproportionate living standards, but don't tax the corporations or the plutocrats that run them you dumb goyim"

And let me add, robots will make the already over abundance of human labor obsolete.

So all these poor immigrants we are importing will be poor rioting looters in the next 15-30 years.

I don't care. Rebirth is what those in power tell the masses.

resist.com/AReligionforAryans.htm
Read this. Metempsychosis is a great deterrent to Jewing the world around you in your lifetime (as is having children)

Then sell the serum and get position at the head of FEMA and various other key positions, 2050 was already predicted.

Also

are you a race traitor?

So in otherwords, it's a wet dream for Marx's worldwide revolution where everyone is "equal". I have no doubt they would try to pull this. I wonder if they can pull it off though. Introducing shitskin immigrants has backfired tremendously, ensuring that whites will not integrate with them. Unless some purge is in place (possible) I don't see how we could get enough people on board with this nonsense to get it to go.

That is a pretty good rant, basically the multinational cooperations are taking over national policy. Immigrants, no matter at what level you look at them will create chaos and are a good tool of dividing the will of the people living in that country. I wouldnt call it white genocide, since that is a concept that only applies if those "jews" that see the white race as an enemy are in the majority. They arent, they are the fringe division that joins the globalist agenda. Most of them do not give a shit about race and culture at all, it is more about profit and maintaining power.
The goyim are just to retarded to see that their "priviledges" get slowly taken away and human nature is really good at adapting. IN the end they are the usefull idiots, and a usefull idiot is defined by how much rights he will give up to donate to the cause. In the end it is about money, bitches and power. Your governenment gives jackshit about long term improvements, it has to be shortterm paficifing adaptions, just like the stock market. The best thing you can do in this times is to make shekels, so once it goes down the gutter you at least have wealth and then everything else will sort itself out. A little dark age, and in these dark ages you have to be a little less of a good person.
If you watch the policiies of intel agnencies, governments, idependents and cooperations, they all act on their very own interests, but the goyim is stuck in the carousal. SJWs, are the first outliners of brainwashed braindead controlled people, their context is narrowed, their thoughts are narrowed, basically they are taken out of any effective equation, and Holla Forums is the one fighting their bullshit putting themselves in the same irrelevant position.

IT isnt really a revolution, it is just adaption and rationalizing it. To overextend a bit: It is about masters and slaves.

this is when we do a little something called a coup d' etat

I'd gladly become a terrorist in order to oppose and destroy a globalized world.

If we aren't bringing them to Europe we're sending a chunk of our GDP to them. I think the EU wants to force member states to give away 2-5% of GDP to niggers by 2020. I'm sure they will spend it on food and not machetes.

That is most likely because you are a fucking idiot or a government shill. Which on the same level anyway.

All evidence shows the next revolution will be right wing. The next revolution will include death squads killing everyone who works for the Guardian.

You should rather be a gangster. Make some profits, dont care about politics in the sense you get involved, just watch the outliners, watch the players. Money is key here, gather money, get influence. Liberals and SJWs dont matter since their modern day brand in a modern day context is a slave marker.

But that's laughable.

Six hundred thousand dead Americans beg to differ, you insufferable cunt.

>All of the past “justice revolutions” have stemmed from improved communications Jews
fixed


So we'll all be as poor as the third world.


Holla Forums is always right

Why would you goyim want your own government and culture when we could earn a few more shekels?

I hope they try this, because they will lose so bad and we will finallyl have a popular mandate to turn the heebs into fertiliser

Holy fucking shit.
I have words, but they all want to come out at once.

I could go on, but there is too much

But don't you know goyim that you are a perfect individual unconnected to any silly social constructs like ancestry?

The most disgusting thing about this is the idea of all the worlds souls just randomly being born in the right countries instead of the fact my parents are white and their children will always be white, creating white societies and culture. This lottery or luck idea is pernicious and vile. Don't let this go unchallenged.

Aren't there more slaves in the world today than at any time in history?

This is the funniest part. Anywhere on the internet that has light moderation becomes far right very quickly.

EU is fucked af, while a lot of stuff can be left to speculation, you have to know that the EU political body is incompetent to deal with all the things they want to do.

I know the conspiracies (some credible, some not so much), I have a GB of it… but you cannot grasp how bad the EU problem is until you see exactly how complex is the things the EU wants to do, it'll be comical if it hadn't had so much impact.

Just because they aren't intentionally genociding us doesn't mean they aren't. They seek to profit out of our destruction and install themselves as rulers above the rulers of nations. If corps get large enough we'll start to see them locking up all the business in smaller nations simply by throwing their weight around a bit, and suddenly those places will have two governments, one political and one economical, with the political one being a vestigial entity that's kept around to make the people feel like they still have some say in what's done with them. Citizens have already been abandoned by their elected governments anyways, don't see it taking much longer for governments to sell out completely. The only thing stopping it right now is likely competition from other multinational corporations, or the multinationals not diversifying enough to be able to deal in all of the essential goods a nation requires. I certainly can't see today's politicians wanting to do anything to stop this except asking for a larger cut of the profits.

Kennedi Cotarelo made that picture btw

kennedi check em

shhh goy

I just wonder what the fuck is their endgame here. Nobody profits from this in the long term - not even the jewish oligarchs.

Well the result is what you call "genocide".
(((they))) is a very diverse bunch, from true believers, to sheltered liberals, to ideologists or cold as ice pragmatists. The whole outcome of this however remains interesting.
There are many political solutions that might turn this around in a broader sense, which are difficult to implement.

Yeah but those slaves are in africa and everyone knows that africa is full of nice hardworking people who are just down on their luck right now.

There is no real endgame, just zeitgeist working in mysterious way. Most intellectuals have been made retarded and nullified.

You're missing the point. It's no coincidence that you were born with your specific genetic makeup to your parents, any more than evolution itself is a coincidence.

Like I said here

It has to do less with one giant conspiracy, and more with general incompetence. Asking "politicians" to do a scientist's job is suicide.

Historically, the National Academy of Sciences is a new thing. Presidents, Chancellors, etc are incapable to deal with what's to be done.

They want to create integration without knowing how that takes place.

They want to savage conflicts without the military, without understanding human behavior.

They want give everyone a chance, without having a plan.

They want wealth and power while moving forward, without understanding how wealth and power are primitive tools arisen from scarcity.

No one is talking about genes, we're talking about the suffering that is experienced geographically.

I meant:
They want to resolve savage conflicts

Yes, and that geographical situation is related to genes. Do you think it's pure coincidence that the West is developed and a nice place to live while pretty much all of Africa is a dangerous shithole?

What parts of Africa?

What parts of "the West"?

Which is a result of the particular situation of that area, including the people who live there.

i think he's trying to argue that it all comes down to luck which body your "soul" comes to inhabit or something. I think he's making an argument from a pre-existential side of things, like you're lucky that you were born a white baby to white parents in america as opposed to being unlucky enough to be born the fourth black starving child to some black whore in Kenya.

I'm not taking his side, I'm just attempting to interpret.

They WILL spend it on food. And machetes.

What they won't spend it on is education, infrastructure, scientific advancement and medicine. You know, the stuff that makes a country wealthy and great.

But at least they have their liquor and a bowl of fried rice for the week! Thanks white devil!

tell that to most of the humans who suffered war… do you think the Germans in Poland did something to bring war to them in the 1930s? Do you think the basque asked for Rome to come crush them?

Most of human suffering has nothing to do with the person or people around the area. This is why one of the best rules for a ruler is to look out for conflicts in their borders… one day is a king's head rolling, the next day is yours.

I think we are all trapped in our causality. There is no "what if I was born in Africa?". Than would not be you.

And while your argument has some merit and there is such a thing as injustice of course, there is also a reason why black countries remained shitholes for most of their history, save when some invader brought their brand of civilization from the outside.

Sure they do. Its the only way to destroy Western Civilization, Democracy, The Republic, etc without a nuclear war. Once the Civil Society is erased from memory they will simply purge as necessary to to tidy up the balance sheets and continue their absolute rule unopposed.

A fair number of people seem to think its about "destroying whites" and ruling over a race of mulatto thralls. Its not, and such a thing is completely absurd. It is about getting rid of those problematic individualists. Just look at all the oblivious cucks who happily go along with this, they'll still be around, people like you wont be unless they learn to keep their mouths shut and heads down.

Destabilization through mass immigration, and helping chaos flourish until people beg for a strong totalitarian ruler to restore order. Its not even that clever.

He smells so fucking Jewy. Anyone have any proof whether he is Jewish or not?

The British Left is powerless. It is no threat. The real enemy is the Conservative Party and its puppetmasters. When you get angry with useful idiots on the Left, you're only getting distracted from the real traitors.

Anecdote time! I used to live in the middle of Africa. We would give out special malnutrition food packets to the mothers of small literally-starving-to-death children so they could feed them. We had to stop doing that because the mothers would just go home and eat the food packets themselves and not give any to their kids. We had to force them to bring the children with them and have them eat the food packets right there where we could watch, else the kids wouldn't get a thing.

Africa is a beautiful continent inhabited by the second-lowest form of human trash (the absolute lowest still belongs to Australia's Aboriginals). I can't wait for China to wipe them out.

...

As soon as he started talking about the Glorious Revolution in terms of anything more than a dynastic shift, I stopped reading.

China will just impose the discipline Africa so much needs. After a certain point, the system becomes self-perpetuating… I'm more interested at humanity's technological advancement by the next ~2 decades. Genetic selection is coming REALLY soon, and seeing how forward Chinese are, it wouldn't surprise me to see the first supersoldiershumans somewhere around Africa (outside a Chinese research facility).

I know the US has been poking that pandora's box too since the end of WW2, BUT more seriously since a decade ago.

I dislike how much this "quote" cuts out. -.-

what you are saying, countries that have no political power just economic power, and thus citizens with no freedoms, is EXACTLY what the black bartender from hong kong says in Deus Ex 1

You are right, as was the virtual nigger

sounds like a euphemism for worldwide chimpout to me.

Knew a guy who did one of those Christian Charities in Africa where they go in and build schools.

So thats what they were doing for a month, but they ran out of certain materials and needed to order more. So they told the people that they were going to come back in a couple months and finish the school. And that while they were gone it was VERY IMPORTANT to make sure the tarps they left remained covering the bags of cement or they would get ruined.

So they come back two months later, all the tarps are gone. All the cement is ruined. The villagers had taken the tarps and used them for all sorts of shit like fixing leaky roofs, making hammocks, water catchers, or just randomly stuffed in some bush for reasons unknown.

Thats what holds them back. No long term thinking, lazy, and being incapable of sacrificing any personal comfort for the sake of others. It has nothing to do with colonization.

I love the narratives leftist aid workers come up with to explain the total misuse of aid by Africans. They have literally every excuse imaginable. Every charity talks shit about the others, because none of them work. They can look at someone else's model and see exactly how it will fail. But they can't abide looking at their own in the same light.

Nice trips btw.

Pretty terrible one if that's the case. The Glorious Revolution was only 'glorious' precisely because there wasn't an all-out succession war fought over it, and also because it was a remarkably peaceful transition.

It's definitely their culture and race. I mean, look at places like Singapore and Hong Kong in comparison.

Niggers will never stop being niggers because they are niggers. Its a never ending cycle. The circle of Nigger.

anyone who's actually been to Africa for any extended period of time has the same stories you tell.

There was one guy who went over their for charity work or something and was responsible for teaching the nigs how to set up a farm. He had machinery and other tools at his disposal, and he took on a nig who "owned" a large enough stretch of land he wasn't doing anything with. In one year they had a working farm. The white guy maintained it with the black dude's help for one more year, despite the black dude wanting to consistently waste their current resources for short term gain rather than save any money for seeds, to reap in the future.

White dude left after the second year. Came back some time later, not sure how long. He went back to visit the nog, and guess what? The nog had sold the last batch of crops he had (which was from back when the white guy left), broken down all the machinery and sold it for scrap, sold all the tools, the farm was overgrown with weeds and unused again, and the nog no longer had any money at all.

When the white dude told this story, he made it abundantly clear that in this area, you could never have too much food. They kept making more and more money as time went on and the farm kept producing, there was more profit every season. The nig fucking threw it all away and spent all the money after the white guy left, and was just as poor as he was 3 years prior when he started the farm. Also of note, when the nig and white guy got the farm going, after a couple seasons he got family members by the dozens coming out of the woodwork, swinging by the farm, demanding money and food. Constantly. They didn't even ask, they just demanded it, and he always gave it to them, and they went on their way only to come back some other time.

Fucking niggers. Squirrels have more foresight than they do, nogs never even needed to develop the ability to plan, because they just wander out into the resource rich bush and pluck or kill what they need. When we eventually become too large a population for our countries, we will head to africa. We will compete with the Asians for land, and all the niggers will be obliterated in the crossfire.

Wow. Absolutely unbelievable and insulting that (((The Guardian))) would cite Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" in an article that suggests nations ought to have no sovereignty.


Such a sentiment utterly disregards a nation's right to its own prosperity. The article is ignorant of the fact that separate nations have separate strengths. True diversity will never be achieved if the world is united under one banner. Only when nations are able to cater to their own unique strengths will Earth prosper as a force to be reckoned with.

Do we need to break it down county by county? You get my point, stop unnecessarily complicating things.

Civilizations, living conditions, culture, etc. These are extensions of genetics, basically genetic expression on a large scale. So while we as individuals may have been born by "chance" to whatever parents, the fact that we as a genetic group, a people, were born in a certain place is no mere chance. It is because our ancestors built these places, just like the ancestors of the people born in the third world built those places.

That is to say, we deserve the fruits of our ancestors labors, and our descendants deserve the fruits of ours. For this reason it is akin to cuckoldry to squander the gifts your ancestors gave you for the well-being of another group, or people.


Maybe so, but that doesn't change my point.

(checked)

Just like sending aid to Africa.

On the surface it seems like a pretty nice thing to do. You just saved some people from starving to death in the near future. That's a good thing, right?

For one, constant aid of food and supplies cripples the ability of any African country to become self-sufficient. Of the few Africans that may be capable of starting a business to produce goods or food, they can't hope to compete with free shit which keeps Africa dependent on foreign aid indefinitely.

And second, what do they do with their newfound time on Earth? About the only thing there is to do in shit-poor countries - bang all the time. The African population has been increasing exponentially for some time despite the African continent being completely incapable of supporting even 1/4 of their current population. Realize that there are BILLIONS of people in Africa and the population continues to grow at an incredible rate, and they are completely dependent on foreign aid. And no matter how hard we may try, we cannot increase global food production at an exponential rate to match their population growth. They must be allowed to become self-sufficient, even if it is a painful process. Though our intentions may be good trying to support them though I suspect our global "leaders" are aware of the truth and have an interest in keeping Africa under control we are ultimately creating a situation where there will be starvation and mass unrest in Africa on a scale never before seen on Earth. Billions of Africans starving and fighting for whatever resources they can get their hands on. Unprecedented amounts of human suffering.

So have a heart and don't sponsor any African children. You are dooming them, and if not them, their children.

Though this is true, if they would actually learn to farm they could support a lot of people with their land. But they won't because niggers.

I like the way you think. Also, once foreign aid is withdrawn (once one supporter goes the card pyramid will tumble due to the strain), the world shall witness the largest "human" die-off since antediluvian times.

I get your point, HOWEVER I'm not making it more complicated.

I'm simply laying out a mechanism to understand these sort of things. They're multi-variable, so they're complex. Solving (as in hiding) a problem you see before you will only generate more problems, however coming up with a system that looks at the whole picture can solve the problem without that drawback.

Meme magic strikes again!

lurk moar

Wew lad.


> worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n87122630/


No, vermin.

The next revolution will be to destroy you.
Praise Kek

All the idiots posting in this thread about how they don't want to wipe us out don't understand how they think.

White people are competitors to the kikes. We're capable of beating them and overcoming them, and the most clear and direct threat to their continued rule. A quick look at history and the sort of societies they like to rule over makes it clear that they'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven - a communist/globalist society where things are far, far worse than they are now but their rulership is permanently secured is what they're actively working towards.

..Then they head north to Europe. That's the goal.

Fucking based post, tbh fam. Africa will never rise to its true glory kek with foreign aid supporting the sad, starving children you see on television.

TL;DR: Quit buying mosquito nets faggots

researchgate.net/profile/Virginia_Shiller/publications

...

I wasn't sure if Robert J. Shiller was the same Robert Shiller. Not a common name, but one is a professor of economics while the other is a journalist, hence my question.

That's the tragedy of it. Africa is an extremely fertile and beautiful land inhabited by people largely incapable of appreciating it or putting it to use.


Sure we can argue about abstract points. But the basic concept remains true - that it is immoral and a betrayal of your ancestors to waste their gifts on another people that cannot appreciate them and will squander them and will return to their base state as soon as you stop providing for them.


That's a scary thought.

Any connection between this and the Clinton stuff?

Everything you've written is correct save for one thing, which is only half correct (implicitly).
This is true but I just want to make certain you know that geography and ecosystem influence genetics as well. You never said it doesn't, I understand that, but I want to make sure you understand that genetics and geography have a feedback loop. Genetics are a direct result of the geography and surrounding physical and biological environment, but also directly affect it as well; geography and the ecosystem exhibits selection pressure on genetics, but manifestation of those phenotypes changes the environment.

Just for future reference if you weren't already aware. And in regards to sending Africa aid, that's a very tall leg of the footstool. We can't keep it there forever, and when we yank it out by virtue of ceasing aid to Africa (which I think we should fucking do immediately) it's going to be a hard lesson for them.

Ironically, if we hadn't been sending aid to africa for all these years, they wouldn't have such an artificially inflated population, and they may have had to evolve enough to act self sufficient, as their ancestors had been before whites ever encountered them.

Have you read The Camp of Saints? You should, it's amazing, yet absolutely horrifying. Seriously, it had me going fucking nuts how accurate it was.

jrbooksonline.com/pdfs/camp_of_the_saints.pdf

…and it's been happening over the last half decade.

The only things being overthrown are narratives such as this.

This is a death rattle; The Guardian is a trust fund propaganda agency posing as a news group.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Trust_Limited

They have under a billion left in the bank and spent/ lost 127 million pounds last year.

They are losing, the hard left is anti nature and nature always wins out.

>GET OUTTA HERE EFF BEE EYE. I SEE U SHLOMO, YOU'RE NOT GONNA FOOL ME INTO TAKING A CHANCE AND DOING SOMETHING THAT COULD BENEFIT MY NATION AND COMMUNITY

I agree with that point. But know that I'm actually against giving "freebies" to anyone, much less yo a different group.

Historically, you have to let people work for those "freebies" otherwise they will demand it from you. Again, historical autism, but I'm serious in actually solving these problems. If we do not, it's only a matter of time before war. Only those that do not know of how horrific war is, advocate for it like children asking for candy (sadly, that's many in this board)

Groids had millions of years to evolve to a higher level, even just by a little bit, and still didn't user.

10/10 post here my friend.

We learned to farm because we were forced to by our environment. It was either that or act solely as hunter-gatherers, and if we hadn't begun to evolve greater intelligence and stayed that way, our numbers would be a mere fraction of what they currently are.

Also, it is possible that niggers may, eventually, learn to farm and accomplish other things that are the hallmarks of modern civilization; however, that requires a much greater intelligence and civilized socialization, and for niggers to become that way would require hundreds, if not thousands, of years of evolution.

Niggers will always be niggers during our lifetimes, and probably during the lifetimes of our great great grandchildren. But if you know anything about evolution, you understand that waaaay down the road, they may come into their own. Not that that makes any fucking difference in the present, nor should any of us actually fucking care.

they didn't because there was no selection pressure. There was nothing spurring them to higher intelligence. Whites and northerners in general evolved that way because they needed foresight to plan for winter; if they didn't, they died in droves.

Niggers have no pressure like that. If they get hungry they wander out into the brush and gather plants or hunt game, and come back. They don't have intelligence because they don't have foresight, which they don't have because they don't need it, which they don't need because Africa is resource rich. We as an ethnic group were molded and strengthened by cold harsh winters and ethnic cooperation; niggers don't need much of either.

This is it

This is the final passage in the Protocols of Zion that has yet to pass.

The establishment of a global order.

Bumping because of this extremely relevant post.

No, their nigger genes do that. This is a dumb libertardian argument that assumes all people are equal and can equally maintain some form of structured society.

>daily interactions on computer monitors with foreigners whom we can see are intelligent, decent people

In both online and real world interactions with third world people (in their own lands) I have been struck by the overwhelming realization that THEY ARE the reason they live in poverty.


No doubt in most cases but that counts for little, in fact it never occurred to me to think otherwise.

Third world countries are that way because collectively the people who populate them lack the intuitive to develop to the standards of first world nations.

Furthermore most 3rd world people’s don’t care, left to their own devices they aren’t rolling around in a constant state of misery but rather live to a different set of standards as 1st world peoples.

The only people that seem to care are those who have been intentionally baited to covert the grotesque materialistic culture of the west (our worst quality).

Equality is a false god. Ethno Nationalism for all. NOW!

Misfired my meme arrow

Outdated and gay. You at least realize the Modern Globalist have a strong dislike of Israel, right? Bloodlines have taken a backseat to Ideology. And Zionists care very much about Bloodlines, which is one reason the Globalists dislike them, the other being Nationalism.

You're obviously not from around here, kike

It is sad to me that this post needs bumping yet again.

Nice kennedi dubs

this tbh, their american golem is weakening beyond repair thanks to their policies and the nations under its yoke are getting ready to jump ship. the rise of people like dueturdy in the philipines is a prime example of the rise of nationalism in places that were expected to be happy to receive the global poz load

Selective pressure, bad genes, evil YT, it doesn't matter the reason–niggers have always been the dumbest hominid in earth's history and will remain as such until their extinction.

Even when placed in modern selective pressure circumstances, they fail to adapt despite being catered to as if they were royalty.
Even Koko picked up a human language, something her brain had never evolved to comprehend, and adapted herself well enough to have actual conversations.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just providing scientific explanations to back up racial rhetoric, but you can only give so many excuses before you have to admit the nigger is a hopeless animal.

...

the eternal communist strikes once again

I'll check that out, thanks. Looks good so far.

nice digits m8 (czeched)

That's all true. It wasn't chance that our ancestors were selected for their intelligence, resilience, and ability to plan. Just like the blacks were never selected for anything but aggressiveness because their environment always provided sufficient food and shelter, they never had to adapt. They're probably exactly the same as they were millions of years ago.

Sure, it may be that 100, or 1000 generations from now blacks may evolve to the current average level of whites. But 1) I doubt it because modern excesses and decadence are nothing like the environment our ancestors were selected for and by. Similarly, our race is also growing soft and fat from modern comforts. And 2) It is not the duty of the white man to shelter and provide for the black man until he is on our level. To do so would just be creating an obstacle that we'd have to deal with sooner or later. Every race has a strong in-group preference and will put their own kind above others, and that is a perfectly natural and healthy attitude. By selecting for the strongest, humanity is a whole is strengthened. Selecting for the weakest, as modern "progressives" would have us do only serves to dilute the gene pool and weaken us as a species.


Stay on topic now. Never did I say that blacks are our equal.

You didn't read my other posts then. I explicitly stated that niggers will remain niggers during our lifetimes and, highly likely, during the lifetimes of even our great great grandsons. I made the point that, if you understand evolution, it's possible that they can actually evolve into a civilized race much in the way that whites did, but that would require a stupidly long length of time and many of their generations. I did also point out that that possibility doesn't fucking matter right here in the present, and assuming that we keep them all out of our countries, we shouldn't care. I don't see how you can claim I'm a shill after I've said that unless you just didn't fucking read.


Yes I highly doubt it too. Not only because of today's modern aid packages and shit, but also because blacks have almost always been in Africa. If they never leave that continent, which rarely ever gets very cold, they won't have any reason to evolve, even if everyone stopped sending aid.

To further that point, you can see evidence of the evolution of intelligence by looking at cultures that lived in hot or cold climates. Abos in Australia? Savages. Niggers in Africa? Savages. Arabs in the ME? Savages (although the ME was pretty white for a long time and civilizations thrived there, but now look at it). Aztecs and Incans in the tropical Amazon jungles? Savages. Almost all races of people living in constantly warm or hot climates had environments that provided for them without the need to plan. The people who evolved intelligence at a faster rate and/or sooner than other races were the ones living in cold environs. It's obviously not a black and white rule or the only factor, but it's a definite guideline and a cornerstone explaining why certain races have higher IQs than others.

So from all this, I would say that if you ever wanted a naturally intelligent race of blacks, you'd need to move niggers north from Africa to Russia – over the course of several generations – and then fucking leave them there in the cold to fend for themselves for another 50 gens or so. That gauntlet might give you an intelligent negroid race, and even then it's a might.

Lol

youtube.com/watch?v=PSPTGTpzbiI

But they never did, after tens of thousands of years of opportunity, where even the slightest behavioral change could lead to a drastic alteration. They had the long length of time you mentioned, and yet they smoke their own shit.

Of course not, especially after the massive die-off. You're the one who brought up hypothetical scenarios.

Never called you that, didn't even imply. Maybe you should read posts before jumping to conclusions and casting projections.

Bullshit, all of American's wars of "liberation" in the Middle East have been to destroy once-stable countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria and eventually Iran because Israel didn't like having unfriendly muslim neighbors. Meanwhile, America and Europe essentially import all of the refugees created by senseless wars that do not serve our interests to clear the Middle East of muslims and allow Israel to expand her borders.

The (((Globalist))) agenda operates entirely with Israel at the center. Destroy Israel's muslim neighbors → ship them to the West → let Israel expand

Email [email protected]/* */ if you're still in this thread.

Except in Israel.
Except in Israel.
Except in Israel. Holy shit, does nobody notice this going on? Or are Jews just another one of their selective blind spots?

...

Yes I'm aware of that and I explained why. I posit if that if they stay in Africa, and Africa's climate and ecosystem never changes, niggers won't ever change either. Things don't evolve unless there is an environmental pressure for them to do so or there is genetic drift, meaning they get genetically lucky. Also "they had the long length of time you mentioned" means nothing, because 1) it's not a 'long length of time' in terms of evolution and the lifespan of a species, and 2) time hasn't ended. Your argument from that sentence is "they haven't evolved intelligence in a few thousands years, therefore they never will." That is scientifically incorrect and you're arguing from what seems to be an emotional standpoint. I fucking hate niggers too, I just understand how evolution works.

Oh, you didn't? Let's review: "I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just providing scientific explanations to back up racial rhetoric, but you can only give so many excuses before you have to admit the nigger is a hopeless animal." That statement implies you thought there's a good chance I was shilling, as if you thought I was trying to make excuses for niggers or something.

Try telling me I didn't read posts. Unless, of course, you want to argue that that implication wasn't even there in your statement, to which I'd say come the fuck on.

Maybe one day you'll progress beyond memes, maybe not.


You just contradicted yourself without realizing it. Obongo and the UN having been working hard these past 7 years to let Iran build up nuclear capability. Lots of people like to cite Project For A New American Century on Iraq. Well that was ultimately about fucking over and containing Russia. Syria is about fucking with Russia. Libya was about oil and money.

That paranoid Zionists in Israel think they're benefiting from it is just an example of intersecting goals happening on the geopolitical stage. Meanwhile the Globalist/Leftist degeneracy has infected Israel just like everywhere else. Diversity is coming to Israel too. Just not as rapidly as in the West because its a small nation with intense Government Indoctrination within the school system, and constant Palestinian attacks reinforce that indoctrination and the fear it creates keeps people more in line, more closely bonded to their fellow Jews.

The same Nationalist backlash thats happening in Europe over mass migration has been going on in Israel for generations. But even so they're slowly losing ground with the younger generation.

This is communism, tbh,

Also sounds like they're already admitting defeat and they're trying to pre-emptively meme the next Communist/Jewish attempt at the NWO. Either that, or this author is just one of those dumb assholes who thinks what's happening today isn't "real Communism."

tldr: global communism

Are these people dumb? Do they not see the West is moving in the exact opposite direction?

The Protocols of Zion

How's the weather in Tel-Aviv?

The kikes are in power and they use their subvertive ideologies, economic-ideologies and culture to make goyim work for them. But make no mistake, there's no equality, there's no such thing as people wanting more money, it's not done because of that, but to consolidate power.

It's ultimately the vision of the jews that they are going to end up with. The kikes at the top and the top goyims as their slaves. They are promised by their god to inherit the earth and they are damned to make it happen, no matter if some dumb nihilist user says so or not.

But i don't believe you're dumb, i believe you're a JIDF-shill. Which you can clearly tell in your choice of words.

But we should stop caring for them. Let the chips fall were they may and let them do it themselves.

You aren't born in a country by chance. There's a very specific process to make a child.

Also, this is great, their own rhetoric opens them up to showing why our countries are superior.

The Guardian cartoonist cucks were the ones who ran the art course I used to go to, I remember one of the students made an irreverent comic about Muhammad and posted it online, the cuck teachers were scared shitless and told him to take it down.

So they're afraid of these savages but still shill for tolerance in their trash comics in the Graun.

The effect will be no Whites anymore in Europe. Defenerative diseases, chaos and depopulation, as brown and blackouts will kill the old (mostly white) in their 80ies. Then the now free funds go to fund brown and black 3-4 children families, which deliver the grounds for an allout total war in Europe. Until then, no nuclear weapons are left in Europe, to prevent global nuclear annihilation. This or the EU falters before 2020 and a reconquista happens, which will shun (((the UN and multinationals))) and starve Europeans down. Remember, the EU has no oil, no gas and no Uranium. Muh solar. Yeah. Ha.

Niggers are the laziest bioweapon ever conceived.

Corporations are inherently socialist in function. If they become too fascist, they fail in the market. Top salaries don't matter in the great picture. Walmart employs 2.5 Million, Chinacom (or so) also 2 Million and most have the same salary, same housing, same extras from the corporation.
Corporations aren't socialist in nature, because they aren't a coop and most employees don't own shares.
Multis overtaking the global economy means they form their inner workings on all of us. "Fairness" is only on your designated paygrade. Not your race, nation, individual or town. It will be highly hierarchical, as corporations are.

I wonder why nobody notices that.

African kangdoms actually farmed lots of different crops to feed themselves.
This is something colonialism fucked up, alienating them from their farms by planning it out for them over a few generations.

Have no fear, the Globalists will fail.

PEAK OIL will halt their agendas.

If there is no cheap energy, you can't do globalist shit, and economic nationalism raises again.

Get ready for the tech level to regress back to ~1900 as we experience "catabolic collapse" throughout the 21st century.

Its always funny to read these texts about mathematical models about shekel and sales optimization and growth of economy when you know the reason behind it

Zionists were financed by international jewish finance. One of the rothschilds even features on israels paper money

...

Not to mention UN 'famine' relief.

Pull the other one.

Check out this quote from Michel Clouscard a French Marxist.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Clouscard
It's from an interview in French that I can't translate because its a weird pdf.

Also this one
Taking those two things into consideration isn't a national socialist "revolution" more likely? I mean an actual radical revolutionary resistance not just some faggot top-down thing like in the OP.

All it will take is a couple of little bank runs and bout of hyperinflation and the Jewish Empire is over. It really is fragile a/f fam

Mainstream contemporary economics is p much pro free trade and globalization. I respect it's theoretical rigor (Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage is an incredibly potent meme), but it's really Jewish. By that I mean that the central assumption is that more GDP is always good, not to mention that the very existence of economics itself is not questioned. Its very existence presupposes that you can separate economics from the state. So it's no surprise that the ideal state of affairs is a global, stateless economic hegemony. A lot of people fall for this, and so you have politicians running on platforms of economy first, creating jobs, etc in their respective democracies.

Any anons have any sources on national socialist theories of economics? The search results that pop up for me are mostly are analyses of the economy of Nazi Germany. It's not what quite what i'm looking for.

Individualism is a mental disease.


What this famine relief has done is quintuple the population of Africa from 200 mill in the sixties, to now over a billion hungry niggers. How the fuck can anyone be so stupid to think it wasn't the intention all along to breed as many niggers as possible?

bump

Top Kek

Fuck those Orange faggots. The Jacobites will return.

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincus_(surname)
Pincus or Pinkus is a surname of Jewish origin, derived from the given name Pinkus, which in turn originates with the Biblical Hebrew male personal name Pinechas or Phinehas.[1] The name may refer to:
Steven Pincus (born 1962), American historian

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Pincus
The Economist named it as one of the best books on history published in 2009.

The Revolution, Pincus argues, expressed an Anglo-Dutch emphasis on consent of the governed, toleration of different forms of Protestantism, free debate and free commerce.

He was in Oxford for the 2010-2011 academic year working on the origins of the British Empire.

Titles and positions
2005–Present — Bradford Durfee Professor of History, Yale University
1993–2005 — Professor of history, University of Chicago

Here's the book on libgen in epub mobi and pdf:
gen.lib.rus.ec/search.php?req=1688: The First Modern Revolution&open=0&res=25&view=simple&phrase=1&column=title

I tried telling my mom this and she kept replying:
>"I know, but think of the children."
She doesn't get it. I hate this cycle of good and bad that goes on throughout history. Women should never have any say in politics and non-whites are inferior. This isn't hard.

holy shit, it's a tel aviv phonebook

Go back to The Oil Drum.
Oh wait, you can't, the site closed down because the creators couldn't handle the embarrassment of being so wrong anymore.

False quote, sadly. Like bogus deathbed conversions, Schweitzer never said this.

yfw you realise china is only in africa to obtain the big dick gene

Robert Shillers terrible book 'Irrational Exuberance' predicted the dot-com crash. The second edition predicted the housing bubble.
So who was to blame?
Why, you were!
You see, according to Shiller, a boom and crash runs like this:

exhuberant lately, it must be something in the air, you know, the zeitgeist!
and pressurized me for loans!
enthusiastic about the stock market causes booms and crashes!


This crappy book blamed 'investor psychology' for booms and busts. The combination of prose easy enough for the general reader combined with a few graphs and mathematical formulaes to make it seem 'scientific' made it a best seller and he got a nobel prize.
He's supposidly a great economist because he predicted the housing crash.
Well I predicted the housing crash, where's my nobel prize?

'A Short History of Financial Euphoria' by John Kenneth Galbreith is a similar very bad book that blames the enthusiasm of ordinary people for the boom and bust cycle. College libraries always have multiple copies of this junk.
I used to think that these people were merely stupid but some of this stuff is so ridiculous that now I know they must be writing this stuff on purpose. For their masters.

These people are fucking dreaming. They want to censor everyone. I am actually less worried about this now. These retards have no idea what they're talking about.

Your still blue pilled. You just don't know it.

Israel hasn't expanded at all as consequence of the recent western intervention in middle east. They have the same territory they've had since a long time. Right now Israel is an US arrow in the middle east, they have to conform to the American grand strategy. Sure, Israel may have gains by that.

If the west is able to topple Assad then Israel will likely get favorable contracts in the Golan Heights in an agreement with the new Syrian government (btw, that's how power is exerted in the current year by US, they don't take over the land of a country, they simply send corporations to own what they need -but most times what they don't even need). Of course Israel would love to simply annex the Golan Heights but the US is against that because it upsets the Syrian rebels, Palestine and other sandnigger countries in general.


No, I'm not. People have to realize this globalist feel good libtard crap is just US and its heartclose connections attempting to secure hegemony through another clothing.

This "revolution" will only be orchestrated in white countries and everywhere else in the world will happily keep their nation state. You think kikes will destroy Israel in a revolt against the nation state? Think again

Peak oil = bullshit. Look up Thermal depolymerization. Oil can be created indefinitely from other sources. We'll never run out.

Fucking LUL if they actually believe that wages will equalize between different nations.

yeaaah, right.

too bad the ones who don't have native privilege are also the ones who happen to mooch the most.

why are these "intellectuals" so blind to this fact?

torfag is


Bullshit, they still bulldoze and support israeli settlers in palestinian lands


Nigger, its the Yinon plan. Its israel's grand plan to use the USA as a golem.

Yes you are, shekelburg. Go stick your head in a gas oven, and save us the trouble of doing it for you.

infinite growth economics is literally cancer

tl;dr (((communism)))

Okay, what makes you think it will work THIS time?

But rich and poor are just social constructs.

Stop cashsplaining

Yes, go live in Kenora, stay out of Quebec

Dongle Damsel is a kike?

Wow, I should have known.

Just remember, 'comment is free' and that is the value of the comments in the Granuiad.

ITT: people discovering most newspaper columnists are heebs

I imagine the author of this didn't even realize they are insane.

The US has been giving bajillions of dollars in aid every year to "developing countries" for decades. Africa, for example. But nothing ever really gets better. I'm no expert but it seems to me that the number of third world countries actively trying to improve themselves is very small–India, for instance, and maybe some Asian countries like Vietnam or Thailand. The African recipients of our and Europe's generosity just go on nigging. Countries like that will never really get better until and unless we step in and manage them again, a la colonial days. And leftists would start a war if we tried that.

Jewish leftist=insane. Certainly not at all in touch with human realities. Actively in denial.

What context did he mean by this? I'm not familiar with the author.