Why does everyone completely forget about that 3rd building that randomly fell down? This isn't even an argument ppl

Why does everyone completely forget about that 3rd building that randomly fell down? This isn't even an argument ppl.

Perhaps because everyone had evacuated and no one died as a result of the collapse.

There's footage where you can see people watching it happen and they're all like "wait, what?"

Yeah, I'm certainly no "truther", but that shit was a little bizarre.

Lets just leave it at that, goy. Nothing to see here.

Given that it was home to branches of the CIA, it wouldn't shock me if it was a controlled demolition.

What are you talking about? There was a small fire that magically caused the entire building to suddenly collapse in a perfect, linear fashion.
It is also entirely reasonable for a run-of-the-mill fire started by jet fuel that burns off in a matter of seconds to cause one both of the most robust towers in the world to literally turn into powder at freefall speed.

Non of the edgelords shitposting on this board are old enough to remember that day.
They think the japs bombed the World Trade Center and that's what started the Spanish American war of 1914.

...

And yes, it is reasonable that when you have a jetfuel powered fire weakening the structures, that a collapse would take place when the hundreds of thousands of pounds above the fire act as a piledriver.

Nah, i remember seeing it on tv.

It was on every channel. Remember Peter Jennings smoking a cig as they came back to him.

I don't claim to know exactly what happened to make these buildings disappear. It isn't hard to recognize that hundreds and hundreds of incredibly shady things happened surrounding this "terrorist attack" tho.
Skyscrapers had been hit by jets before. Fires have raged for many, many times the duration of these and left similar buildings still standing. The jet fuel burned off in under 60 seconds yet the buildings remained erect for roughly half an hour before being instantly powderized in a perfectly vertical line from 110 stories above at the rate of freefall.
No toppling. No resistance. Almost no rubble. Just a bubbling waterfall of pure dust. The collapse of the twin towers is more suspect than that of Building 7, and that is saying a lot.

16 years ago, i was 14 year old. I remember this day perfectly. Also check out tis video of BBC reprter, saying WTC7 had collapsed, even tho the building was still standing, in the background.

Yeah, I'll need a source on that. And I mean, jumbo fucking jets crashing into skyscrapers.

First of all, according to people who actually know what they're talking about, the jet fuel burned for approximately 5 to 10 minutes. During that time, the steel beams weakened, bent, and then gave out.

The thing about conspiracy theories is that they thrive on manufactured controversy; the arrogant conspiritards simply introduce questions and raise doubt, but it never really amounts to anything. And on top of that, they cherrypick the shit out of their sources and use highly specious reasoning to reach their pseudo-conclusions.

Most b/tards where on there mom's tits
Then the other are zionist media cucks

Jet fuel cant melt steel beams.
More importantly, where is the footage of the plane actually hitting the tower? What about that explosion that goes off after the building is already smoking? Seems like TNT to me.

Is that some R34?

It's R34 because it's an "inside job", and if it really exists then there is porn of it. I've just debunked 911 with porn.

well then its clear that whoever built it, was using the cheapest material. or perhaps they didnt think a fucking plane would crash into it. either way something is weird about it.

...