Why do you hate women?

Why do you hate women?

Other urls found in this thread:

facebook.com/public/Sandhi-Narania
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

cause they have nothing to offer since anime exists

I don't hate them, I just want their monopoly on sex and reproduction taken away

Women do not operate in the real world. They require a world to be built around them by men. If those men fail to maintain that world then women destroy that world and the world around them. This is why we must grow past what has always held men back.

because they are annoying and their pussies smell pretty gross, unless they are preteens

kek.

because all the COOOOL chan websites told me to!

the same reason why I totally hate black people and Jews of course! because i thought all the ironic racism shitposts in the beginning were genuine so I followed along because i wanted to fit in and be a cool chanman! So now, in all the threads i go in and all the the internet chat groups i join i spout the racism and women hate memes unironically, not realizing i'm a massive tool.

if no one else will check these triple dubs, then i will. Heil

You just proved you are a fucking tool with this shit tier post. If you needed "chans" to tell you that niggers, jews and women are worthless you're a fucking idiot. Common sense could have shown you the same thing…kill yourself and save some breathable air for those worthy of it.

...

This. I love women, but with the way things are, they are encouraged with rewards to be shit bags. A good woman is fucking amazing.

.

Also, it kinda bugs me how everyone acts like women are so oppressed even though men are seen as nothing more than cannon fodder while women have endless support and gibs.

Poor dad. All the times..

Because I wasn't born a chad so they always reject me

When women say "equality", they mean petty revenge. When women are "oppressed", they're not getting their way. And thanks to "equality", being male is a sin. God forbid you're white on top of that, but that's off topic ;)

Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.

It is now technically possible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. The male is a biological accident: the y (male) gene is an incomplete x (female) gene, that is, has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.

The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, of love, friendship, affection or tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the service of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can't relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings–hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt–and moreover he is aware or what he is or isn't.

Although completely physical, the male is unfit even for stud service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few men have, he is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but is instead eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in male nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling he attains is next to nothing; and, third, he is not empathizing with his partner, but is obsessed with how he's doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo. It's often said that men use women. Use them for what? Surely not pleasure.

Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if he's lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the male is, nonetheless, obsessed with screwing; he'll swim a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if he thinks there'll be a friendly pussy awaiting him. He'll screw a woman he despises, any snaggle-toothed hag, and, furthermore, pay for the opportunity. Why? Relieving physical tension isn't the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It's not ego satisfaction; that doesn't explain screwing corpses and babies.

(cont)
Completely egocentric, unable to relate, empathize or identify, and filled with a vast, pervasive, diffuse sexuality, the male is psychically passive. He hates his passivity, so he projects it onto women, defines the male as active, then sets out to prove that he is ("prove he's a Man"). His main means of attempting to prove it is screwing (Big Man with a Big Dick tearing off a Big Piece). Since he's attempting to prove an error, he must "prove" it again and again. Screwing, then, is a desperate, compulsive attempt to prove he's not passive, not a woman; but he is passive and does want to be a woman.

Being an incomplete female, the male spends his life attempting to complete himself, to become female. He attempts to do this by constantly seeking out, fraternizing with and trying to live through and fuse with the female, and by claiming as his own all female characteristics–emotional strength and independence, forcefulness, dynamism, decisiveness, coolness, objectivity, assertiveness, courage, integrity, vitality, intensity, depth of character, grooviness, etc. –and projecting onto women all male traits–vanity, frivolity, triviality, weakness, etc. It should be said, though, that the male has one glaring area of superiority over the female–public relations. (He has done a brilliant job of convincing millions of women that men are women and women are men.) The male claim that females find fulfillment through motherhood and sexuality reflects what males think they'd find fulfilling if they were female.

Women, in other words, don't have penis envy; men have pussy envy. When the male accepts his passivity, defines himself as a woman (males as well as females think men are women and women are men), and becomes a transvestite he loses his desire to screw (or to do anything else, for that matter; he fulfills himself as a drag queen) and gets his cock chopped off. He then achieves a continuous diffuse sexual feeling from "being a woman". Screwing is, for a man, a defense against his desire to be female. Sex is itself a sublimation.

War: The male's normal method of compensation for not being female, namely, getting his Big Gun off, is grossly inadequate, as he can get it off only a very limited number of times; so he gets it off on a really massive scale, and proves to the entire world that he's a "Man". Since he has no compassion or ability to empathize or identify, proving his manhood is worth an endless number of lives, including his own–his own life being worthless, he would rather go out in a blaze of glory than plod grimly on for fifty more years.

Niceness, Politeness and "Dignity": Every man, deep down, knows he's a worthless piece of shit. Overwhelmed by a sense of animalism and deeply ashamed of it; wanting, not to express himself, but to hide from others his total physicality, total egocentricity, the hate and contempt he feels for other men, and to hide from himself the hate and contempt he suspects other men feel for him; having a crudely constructed nervous system that is easily upset by the least display of emotion or feeling, the male tries to enforce a "social" code that ensures a perfect blandness, unsullied by the slightest trace of feeling or upsetting opinion. He uses terms like "copulate", "sexual congress", "have relations with" (to men, "sexual relations" is a redundancy), overlaid with stilted manners; the suit on the chimp.

Money, Marriage and Prostitution, Work and Prevention of an Automated Society: There is no human reason for money or for anyone to work more than two or three hours a week at the very most. All non-creative jobs (practically all jobs now being done) could have been automated long ago, and in a moneyless society everyone can have as much of the best of everything as she wants. But there are non-human, male reasons for maintaining the money-work system:

1. Pussy. Despising his highly inadequate self, overcome with intense anxiety and a deep, profound loneliness when by his empty self, desperate to attach himself to any female in dim hopes of completing himself, in the mystical belief that by touching gold he'll turn to gold, the male craves the continuous companionship of women. The company of the lowest female is preferable to his own or that of other men, who serve only to remind him of his repulsiveness. But females, unless very young or very sick, must be coerced or bribed into male company.

2. Supply the non-relating male with the delusion of usefulness, and enable him to try to justify his existence by digging holes and filling them up. Leisure time horrifies the male, who will have nothing to do but contemplate his grotesque self. Unable to relate or to love, the male must work. Females crave absorbing, emotionally satisfying, meaningful activity, but lacking the opportunity or ability for this, they prefer to idle and waste away their time in ways of their own choosing–sleeping, shopping, bowling, shooting pool, playing cards and other games, breeding, reading, walking around, daydreaming, eating, playing with themselves, popping pills, going to the movies, getting analyzed, traveling, raising dogs and cats, lolling on the beach, swimming, watching T.V., listening to music, decorating their houses, gardening, sewing, nightclubbing, dancing, visiting, "improving their minds" (taking courses), and absorbing "culture" (lectures, plays, concerts, "arty" movies). Therefore, many females would, even assuming complete economic equality between the sexes, prefer living with males or peddling their asses on the street, thus having most of their time for themselves, to spending many hours of their days doing boring, stultifying, non-creative work for somebody else, functioning as less than animals, as machines, or, at best,–if able to get a "good" job–co-managing the shitpile. What will liberate women, therefore, from male control is the total elimination of the money-work system, not the attainment of economic equality with men within it.

3. Power and control. Unmasterful in his personal relations with women, the male attains to general masterfulness by the manipulation of money and of everything and everybody controlled by money, in other words, of everything and everybody.

4. Love substitute. Unable to give love or affection, the male gives money. It makes him feel motherly. The mother gives milk; he gives bread. He is the Breadwinner.

5. Provides the male with a goal. Incapable of enjoying the moment, the male needs something to look forward to, and money provides him with an eternal, never-ending goal: Just think what you could do with 80 trillion dollars–Invest it! And in three years time you'd have 300 trillion dollars!!!

6. Provides the basis for the male's major opportunity to control and manipulate–fatherhood.

Fatherhood and Mental Illness (fear, cowardice, timidity, humility, insecurity, passivity): Mother wants what's best for her kids; Daddy only wants what's best for Daddy, that is peace and quiet, pandering to his delusion of dignity ("respect"), a good reflection on himself (status) and the opportunity to control and manipulate, or, if he's an "enlightened" father, to "give guidance". His daughter, in addition, he wants sexually–he gives her hand in marriage; the other part is for him. Daddy, unlike Mother, can never give in to his kids, as he must, at all costs, preserve his delusion of decisiveness, forcefulness, always-rightness and strength. Never getting one's way leads to lack of self-confidence in one's ability to cope with the world and to a passive acceptance of the status quo. Mother loves her kids, although she sometimes gets angry, but anger blows over quickly and even while it exists, doesn't preclude love and basic acceptance. Emotionally diseased Daddy doesn't love his kids; he approves of them–if they're "good", that is, if they're nice, "respectful", obedient, subservient to his will, quiet and not given to unseemly displays of temper that would be most upsetting to Daddy's easily disturbed male nervous system–in other words, if they're passive vegetables. If they're not "good", he doesn't get angry–not if he's a modern, "civilized" father (the old-fashioned ranting, raving brute is preferable, as he is so ridiculous he can be easily despised)–but rather expresses disapproval, a state that, unlike anger, endures and precludes a basic acceptance, leaving the kid with a feeling of worthlessness and a lifelong obsession with being approved of; the result is fear of independent thought, as this leads to unconventional, disapproved of opinions and way of life.

For the kid to want Daddy's approval it must respect Daddy, and, being garbage, Daddy can make sure that he is respected only by remaining aloof, by distantness, by acting on the precept "familiarity breeds contempt", which is, of course, true, if one is contemptible. By being distant and aloof, he is able to remain unknown, mysterious, and, thereby, to inspire fear ("respect").

Disapproval of emotional "scenes" leads to fear of strong emotion, fear of one's own anger and hatred, and to a fear of facing reality, as facing it leads at first to anger and hatred. Fear of anger and hatred combined with a lack of self-confidence in one's ability to cope with and change the world, or even to affect in the slightest way one's own destiny, leads to a mindless belief that the world and most people in it are nice and that the most banal, trivial amusements are great fun and deeply pleasurable.

The effect of fatherhood on males, specifically, is to make them "Men", that is, highly defensive of all impulses to passivity, faggotry, and of desires to be female. Every boy wants to imitate his mother, be her, fuse with her, but Daddy forbids this; he is the mother; he gets to fuse with her. So he tells the boy, sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly, to not be a sissy, to act like a "Man". The boy, scared shitless of and "respecting" his father, complies, and becomes just like Daddy, that model of "Man"-hood, the all-American ideal–the well-behaved heterosexual dullard.

The effect of fatherhood on females is to make them male–dependent, passive, domestic, animalistic, nice, insecure, approval and security seekers, cowardly, humble, "respectful" of authorities and men, closed, not fully responsive, half dead, trivial, dull, conventional, flattened out and thoroughly contemptible. Daddy's Girl, always tense and fearful, uncool, unanalytical, lacking objectivity, appraises Daddy, and thereafter, other men, against a background of fear ("respect") and is not only unable to see the empty shell behind the aloof facade, but accepts the male definition of himself as superior, as a female, and of herself, as inferior, as a male, which, thanks to Daddy, she really is.

It is the increase of fatherhood, resulting from the increased and widespread affluence that fatherhood needs in order to thrive, that has caused the general increase of mindlessness and the decline of women in the United States since the 1920s. The close association of affluence with fatherhood has led, for the most part, to only the wrong girls, namely, the "privileged" middle-class girls, getting "educated".

The effect of fathers, in sum, has been to corrode the world with maleness. The male has a negative Midas touch–everything he touches turns to shit.

Suppression of Individuality, Animalism (domesticity and motherhood) and Functionalism: The male is just a bundle of conditioned reflexes, incapable of a mentally free response; he is tied to his early conditioning, determined completely by his past experiences. His earliest experiences are with his mother, and he is throughout his life tied to her. It never becomes completely clear to the male that he is not part of his mother, that he is he and she is she.

His greatest need is to be guided, sheltered, protected and admired by Mama (men expect women to adore what men shrink from in horror–themselves) and, being completely physical, he yearns to spend his time (that's not spent "out in the world" grimly defending against his passivity) wallowing in basic animal activities–eating, sleeping, shitting, relaxing and being soothed by Mama. Passive, rattle-headed Daddy's Girl, ever eager for approval, for a pat on the head, for the "respect" of any passing piece of garbage, is easily reduced to Mama, mindless ministrator to physical needs, soother of the weary, apey brow, booster of the puny ego, appreciator of the contemptible, a hot water bottle with tits.

The reduction to animals of the women of the most backward segment of society–the "privileged, educated" middle-class, the backwash of humanity–where Daddy reigns supreme, has been so thorough that they try to groove on labor pains and lie around in the most advanced nation in the world in the middle of the twentieth century with babies chomping away on their tits. It's not for the kids' sake, though, that the "experts" tell women that Mama should stay home and grovel in animalism, but for Daddy's; the tit's for Daddy to hang onto; the labor pains for Daddy to vicariously groove on (half dead, he needs awfully strong stimuli to make him respond).

Reducing the female to an animal, to Mama, to a male, is necessary for psychological as well as practical reasons: the male is a mere member of the species, interchangeable with every other male. He has no deep-seated individuality, which stems from what intrigues you, what outside yourself absorbs you, what you're in relation to. Completely self-absorbed, capable of being in relation only to their bodies and physical sensations, males differ from each other only to the degree and in the ways they attempt to defend against their passivity and against their desire to be female.

The female's individu
The female's individuality, which he is acutely aware of, but which he doesn't comprehend and isn't capable of relating to or grasping emotionally, frightens and upsets him and fills him with envy. So he denies it in her and proceeds to define everyone in terms of his or her function or use, assigning to himself, of course, the most important functions–doctor, president, scientist–thereby providing himself with an identity, if not individuality, and tries to convince himself and women (he's succeeded best at convincing women) that the female function is to bear and raise children and to relax, comfort and boost the ego of the male; that her function is such as to make her interchangeable with every other female. In actual fact, the female function is to relate, groove, love and be herself, irreplaceable by anyone else; the male function is to produce sperm. We now have sperm banks.
ality, which he is acutely aware of, but which he doesn't comprehend and isn't capable of relating to or grasping emotionally, frightens and upsets him and fills him with envy. So he denies it in her and proceeds to define everyone in terms of his or her function or use, assigning to himself, of course, the most important functions–doctor, president, scientist–thereby providing himself with an identity, if not individuality, and tries to convince himself and women (he's succeeded best at convincing women) that the female function is to bear and raise children and to relax, comfort and boost the ego of the male; that her function is such as to make her interchangeable with every other female. In actual fact, the female function is to relate, groove, love and be herself, irreplaceable by anyone else; the male function is to produce sperm. We now have sperm banks.

They are basically useless unless you want to reproduce, and even that's fucked because there's roughly a 50% rate you'll get raped in court and never see your child.

Check both of those for me. My very existence is a trigger.

All in the name of equality is being born the wrong gender and the wrong race a bad thing.

Wait… why does that sound familiar?

It's not how you act, but what you were born as that judges whether you are a good person or not apparently. Just the same shit with a new face.

Pretty much. What's even worse is that they deny racism and sexism works in the "opposite direction", which just makes it easier to do the very thing they say is impossible!

One of my favorite things to say is that reverse racism, sexism, etc., don't exist. Because what you're literally saying is "the reverse of racism" or "the reverse of sexism" which is non-racism/sexism. Because it's not reverse racism/sexism, it's just racism/sexism. But because we have been instilled with the idea you can only be racist to minorities and sexist to women, it's called "reverse ___ism".

Modern day feminism is more about revenge than equality. But fighting against it makes you sexist or racist or a bigot. I don't wanna be "the boy who cried fascist", that word is incredibly overused today by both sides… but honestly? A restriction of free speech and rights is just one step towards fascism.

It's absolutely terrifying.

i liek my mom

I feel you. Saying you'd like to be treated like a human being makes you a misogynistic shitbag so I just keep my mouth shut. The direction we are heading is one of the reasons I am 30 years old with no children. That and insurmountable trust issues with the opposite sex thanks to trauma.

...

I hate people.

here is a real woman for you
dare to rape her
facebook.com/public/Sandhi-Narania

I don't hate them but there are many points on which I have to criticize many women, just to name a few:

Women who say that all men are the same are usually just sluts that hopped on too many dicks. They claim that they need a guy who respects them and treats them right but in reality they don't desire such a man because all they need is attention and protection, also money, it's just like back in the caveman day, the woman goes with the strongest alpha male because he conquers and protects her.

Women who fucked with a lot of guys are not desirable nor valuable for a man for many reasons. Why would a man want to be a with a woman where he is not even second or third, a woman that many men have sprayed their DNA on and in, they fucked her like a worthless bitch before you and they can all say that they fucked your woman, it's like buying and wearing a second-hand sweater that everyone woe and sweated and sneezed on. She saw so many dicks, you are not even special for her and she acted out all her kinky desires with other men already and then she will find some beta cuck to tell him "it's not a competition" even though she knows someone else fucked her better with a better cock and for him there will be no hot steamy sex, only fake moaning and boring sex and she will try to use sex to manipulate him. Alpha male continues to fuck many different sluts because women will give him their cunt and everyone else gets the left-overs.

Women have the upper hand when it comes to choosing sex partners since they can fuck all the "hot muscular tatted, bearded alphas" (which is masculine to a woman) they desire when they want, because there will always be a cock looking out for a pussy no matter how ugly she is, a woman can just choose a guy and get fucked, they can even make lots of money by selling they virginity, can you imagine a man doing that, impossible. They say men only care about sex, yet they give pussy to these exact men and a woman who makes that statement has nothing else to offer anyway.

Therese also a shitload of whores looking for some bullshit "bonnie and clyde relationship" with a criminal "bad boy" thug which only exists in their shitty imagination. They look for a man among ex-convicts, gangsters and other thugs because that type of man is "masculine and thrilling" to her and makes her cunt wet and many whores also think that they are the one woman to tame that "rebellious bad boy". And then they are surprised that they got treated bad and probably got their ass beat and got cheated on by him.

Women never make the first step which is also a reason why they get fucked by many guys, it pushes their whore egos when a man "conquers" them, in clubs etc. among women there is a competition going, which girl gets more guys to flirt with her and all that shit.

And no man is "afraid" of a "powerful, strong" woman, no man wants to be with a loose slut that is also loud mouthed bitch.

Then when a woman is in her 30's and without a man, she will seek for a beta -male to settle down and fulfill her wishes of children and so forth, she did all she wanted sexually, had all the men that made her cunt wet and now she just chooses a cuck that complies and can be used for her personal plans. Once she had a man that respected her and treated her good she will most likely get tired of him, she will cheat and drop him, possibly having him paying child support and she fucks with other men while the children are in another room at her place.

Women say it's hypocritical of men when they "slut shame" them but look porn and fuck sluts. They don't realize that a man doesn't need to respect a woman in order to fuck her or jerk off to porn, a man only needs a hard dick for that. And they will put all the men that respect them in the friend zone anyway so they can get compliments and attention but they will give their pussy to a guy who doesn't respect them or "treat them right".

been rejected and betrayed multiple times by them, they expect everything to come to them.

whores.