ALERT

ALERT

SAMSON OPTION NOW CODE YELLOW

We are in imminent danger of being shut down on the clearnet. Copy and paste this entire post to a text document. Multiple sites have had their domains seized and we are next on the chopping block. We need to make preparations to go to war with the entire internet right now.

Download Tor browser here
torproject.org/download/download
8ch's onion site. When the domain goes down point the Tor browser to this address and you will be able to access the site.
oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion

Zeronet: 127.0.0.1:43110/0chan.bit
zeronet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq/
Install AdNauseam which is much like Ublock Origin and it will send false clicks to advertisers. In the settings make sure to enable 'Click Ads' and set the slider between 'sometimes' and 'always' so spam detection systems don't block you.

github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam

In the event that the Samson Option goes code red (8ch.net is shut down) we will holocaust the ad revenue of the entire internet and spread chaos everywhere. This thread will be for planning. We won't go meekly into the night.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/QiZAA
occidentaldissent.com/2017/08/26/the-shuttering-continues-stormfront-falls-to-domain-stealing-bolsheviks/
youtube.com/watch?v=UEannNh8ihA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

GOOGLE Admits 'Fake Traffic'

Google Issuing Refunds to Advertisers Over Fake Traffic, Plans New Safeguard

Some advertisers question level of refunds, want more details about fraudulent traffic

archive.fo/QiZAA

Google is issuing refunds for ads that ran on websites with fake traffic, people familiar with the situation said, as the web giant develops a tool to give marketers more transparency about the ads they buy through its platform.

In the past few weeks, the Alphabet Inc. unit has informed hundreds of marketers and ad agency partners about the issue with invalid traffic, known in the industry as “ad fraud.” The ads were bought using the company’s DoubleClick Bid Manager over the course of a few months this year, primarily in the second quarter.

Google’s refunds amount to only a fraction of the cost of the ads served to invalid traffic, which has left some advertising executives unsatisfied, the people familiar with the situation said. Google has offered to reimburse its “platform fee,” which ad buyers said typically ranges from about 7% to 10% of their total purchase.

The company says this is appropriate because it doesn’t control the rest of the money spent. Typically, advertisers use DoubleClick Bid Manager to target audiences across vast numbers of websites in seconds by connecting to dozens of online ad exchanges, marketplaces that connect buyers and publishers through real-time auctions.

The ad spending flows through to the exchanges. The problems arise when ads run on publisher sites with fraudulent traffic, including those where clicks are generated by software programs known as “bots” instead of humans. This is an issue of growing concern to marketers. It is difficult to recoup the money paid to those sites when the issue is discovered too late.

Advertisers often receive small credits from Google and their other ad-tech vendors when they detect discrepancies, but in this case, for some buyers, the instance of fraud discovered was larger than usual.

It’s the latest evidence of how the complexity of the digital advertising ecosystem—an industry where marketers and ad sellers are separated by layers of middlemen and automation—can cause tensions between Madison Avenue and big players like Google. Just a few months ago, some marketers suspended their campaigns from Google’s YouTube after revelations their ads appeared next to hateful or otherwise unsavory videos. YouTube has taken steps to assuage marketers’ concerns, and many brands have now returned to the platform. Ad agencies, too, have battled with Google to let them access more of its extensive data to help them improve how ads are targeted and measure whether they are effective.

Scott Spencer, director of product management for Google, acknowledged that refunds have been paid, but he declined to provide a dollar figure for the amount being returned. Some ad buyers said the refund amounts range from “less money than you would spend on a sandwich” to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Some agencies and advertisers were affected more than others, depending on their level of spending during the period and the types of ads they bought.

“Today, we can’t disclose the information about third parties,” Mr. Spencer said. “So when we aren’t able to catch invalid traffic before it impacts our advertisers and we’re unable to refund their media spend, it hurts us, even if we’re not responsible.”

Google is working on a fix it hopes will provide some clarity over which technology providers in the ad-buying chain are responsible for issuing refunds. It is also working on technology to ensure advertisers automatically receive a full credit back from Google and its partners if incidents occur.

The company said it is entering discussions with the 100-plus exchanges, ad networks and publishers that DoubleClick Bid Manager plugs into, asking them to display to ad buyers whether they are willing to refund the entire media spend if ad-fraud instances occur. Buyers could then opt to filter out the sources of inventory that don’t have such a policy.

Mr. Spencer said Google expects “high rates of adoption” among exchanges, and that the ones it had spoken to so far had been “very supportive” of the effort.

Another point of contention among those receiving refunds is that they haven’t been given details about where their ads ended up or specific details about the exploits the fraudsters used, so that advertisers and agencies can apply their own safeguards in the future.

“We need to be very careful about commenting on or discussing specifics about bots or our detection,” Mr. Spencer said. “Often fraudsters will change their approaches and strategies based on our public comments.”

occidentaldissent.com/2017/08/26/the-shuttering-continues-stormfront-falls-to-domain-stealing-bolsheviks/

No I am not confusing this with The DS. I am talking about the 20 year old STORMFRONT forum. The original. They just had their domain name taken away with no indication why. They are moving down the list of their enemy's. Chans when?

Obama handed over control of ICANN to the UN. CEO is a Swedish. Every domain registar has to answer to ICANN so you cant just go someplace else. There is no place else now.

bump

What the fuck is going on?

Holla Forums is boutta get fucked hopefully

DONT FORGET Holla Forums HAS AN ONION SITE IN CASE THE CLEARNET DOMAIN GETS CLASSIFIED 'MUH HATE SPEECH'

bump
youtube.com/watch?v=UEannNh8ihA

How do you know this?

He's just speculating since Stormfront got taken down by the Swedes at ICANN today.

Oh, so he's just being hysterical, got it. I figured that was the case.

Wouldn't it be funny if they deleted stormfront for something they didn't even say but then come to Holla Forums and say "I don't see anything wrong here, carry on"

I'm curious as to why this would occur now? Was Trump getting elected that big of a fucking deal to these people? Don't they know that the backlash will get 200% worse if they continue to brazenly censor these things?

If they started deleting *chans it would be Gamergate 2.0

Gamergate 2.0 Electric Boogaloo

The difference between Holla Forums and stormfront is that Holla Forums isn't a propaganda site. Sure, there is plenty of content that would fit in with the narrative on stormfront, but it's a pretty mixed bag.

Isn't the most active board here Holla Forums still?
I'd assume it could be argued in some court that this is technically a "hate speech" site.

It would probably go to the highest court wherever it would be filed to determine if there is such a thing, but I wonder if the site would be frozen in the mean time?

That's not the point. It isn't about racism or propaganda. It's about pushing censorship until the governments in charge say "stop"

Yes, but there are too many active boards that aren't Holla Forums, and one of them is the exact opposite of it.

Also, they probably have enough sense to know that they'd be playing a game of whack-a-mole if they shut down Holla Forums.


I didn't say it wasnt, autist.

yes, because there was genuine opposition to their bullshit for the first time since they killed JFK

backlash from where, user? the only people speaking will be muzzled, and the plebs are none-the-wiser

That'll be answer. The summerfags mother won't let them download TOR.
REKT!!

This site is a CIA honeypot run by a cryptokike freemason. It's not going anywhere.

ok

Listen fucktard, I wouldn't go to war with a housefly over this shithole website, let alone war with the "entire internet", whatever you think that even means. If it gets shut down, who fucking cares? A couple dozen socially retarded teenagers who have no lives anyway, that's who. Nobody else here gives two shits one way or the other. So either get the stick out of your ass or cover yourself with mustard and call yourself a corndog.

ok

THE

PEDO

UPRISING

.

DYSNOMIA IS SLAUGHTERING THE PEDOS

these fucking jews man

One virginal cherry at a time, the sick fuck

That would make us the controlled opposition

You clearly don't belong here.

What if we make 8ch fall ? They can't shut it down if it's already down.

Go away google.

Go back.

I just did a poo in the toilet.
I am very proud.

Faggot