Is RMS's definition of "hacker" the correct one?

Is RMS's definition of "hacker" the correct one?

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html
gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
notabug.org/jadedctrl/libertybsd-scripts
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yes.

Is he a discordian? I see that he uses frequent discordian lingo such as "copyleft" and this image (to the right) shows a chaos star.

And final question... Why does he always wear red shirts?
Gred hil

Question is ill-defined.

No, it is merely one of many correct definitions

Stallman is always right.

"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children."

"There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children."

On necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia:

"All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."

"For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it."

Give me a good, logical reason as to how any of those statements are wrong.

It doesn't matter if a child thinks they are a "willing participant" in a sexual relationship, when they grow up and fully understand the nature and consequences of what happened and how society views it, it will harm most of them.

God damn it Stallman

"There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children."
Without even considering the fact that no children is mature enough to be consenting, these children could "consent" now as children, and realize what they've done later.
Or because it hurts society as a whole (equating mental illnesses to "alternate tastes" is what does). Individual isn't everything.
Wut? If I don't want my corpse raped, anyone in my family can void this?

Anyway, I don't think Stallman as the typical nation wrecking kike, just an extreme lolbertarian. He's sincere, that's how I can "excuse" him. He's still retarded.

You should take into account the severe autism he has.
He barely understands the concepts he is talking about here, such as death.
Stallman probably saw some emotional funeral once and thought that's necrophilia.

Stallman is not your lefty professor either.
I wouldn't be surprised if he eventually speaks out about JQ or some other matter like that, he is banned in Israel already.

I had an autistic classmate who didn't understand aging at all, he believed his age depends on his grade and if he'd go back to 5th grade he would be 10 again. Stallman has issues like that.

He got copyleft from Don Hopkins. He did found his own parody religion, the Church of Emacs.

Well you wouldn't want to cuck some guy by fucking his dead wife, would you?

Is Stallman legitimately autistic, complete with professional diagnosis, or are we just speculating here?


Did he try to intentionally fail class so he could become immortal by repeating the same grade indefinitely?

He could perhaps get a professional autism diagnosis by current standards, but by the old standards he would just be weird. He's not stupid, except socially.

If you search around his site (specifically his political notes) the few specific complaints about unjust sentences for pedophilia all involve male teenagers and female adults.

He's right about the pedophilia stuff. Look up Rind et al.

Sure I would.

i think he p much invented hacking so basically yeah

Not really. He was introduced into the world of hacking by other hackers who came before him. He's continuing in the way and the definition of what was taught to him in the 1960's.

if youre older than unix time i think its acceptable to be mislabelled the father of hacking

It means how it's used. I like both major usages. I especially like the way TV news retards use it, they make hackers look like cyber Al-Qaida.

Every action can be construed as harmful this way, that's Not An Argumentâ„¢.


see pic

Are you sure? Last time I heard he had a talk to do in Palestine and the Jews tried to get him to do one for them without paying his expenses like the Palestinians paid. Point being, he was allowed to enter the country.

In FAIF 2.0 there are some speculations about Stallman being autistic. Stallman himself believes he may be "borderline". Remarkably, it's what Torvalds says about himself too. And Torvalds would be a complete normie compared to Stallman.

I will try to ask him directly next time I bug him about TempleOS still not being recognized by FSF as free libre OS.

Statistics

Not sure if "public domain" would count as free/libre, at the very least it's definitely not Copyleft.

Who gives a shit what an autistic kike thinks?

No. I'm sure he would unleash ungodly amounts of neckbeard butthurt onto anyone that called him a fag, because fag no longer means the end of a cigarette. It means homosexual. Words have meanings and those meanings change with usage. That autist does a disservice to the FOSS community as a whole. RMS is a fucking fag.

I can't wait till it's open season on pedos
It's going too fun hunting your fat pedo ass down and stick a broomhandle 2 feet up your ass until you die of internal bleeding, same goes for the pedo kike stallman

Never gonna happen you edgy Holla Forumstard.
You clearly have homosexual and sadomasochistic tendencies, looks like you would die in your own Holla Forumstard fantasy

I think Torvalds was just joking, he used autism like we use it on the internet rather than the real medical definition.

Ever read the suspiciously specific rules about parrots that RMS has in his ryder?

they dont endorse openbsd which is totally free/libre, i think they only have interest GNU userland only...

Stallman does not endorse any of the BSDs because they have non-free firmware and programs in their repos.

Stop being fucking uneducated moron.
The software is free/libre if the user have four essential freedoms.
Copyleft and GPL is the completely different topic.
There're the non-GNU OSes which FSF endorse.
gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html
Only Replicant is listed so far.

Here are the guidelines gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
TempleOS follows all of them, and should be listed too.
The reason it's not is you not bothering Stallman about this matter hard enough.

*BDSs are not endorsed because
1) non-free firmware are shipped with the distros
2) repositories/ports have non-free software

LibertyBSD could get approved by FSF when/if ready.
notabug.org/jadedctrl/libertybsd-scripts

TempleOS is a toy for people who like an OS they can tinker around with. There is nothing wrong with that if that's what you want, but it is not something you would want to put on a business's computers. It's toy status might be why the FSF is not including it in the list.

Stallman is right.
This was basically how it worked in greece even, it was based on consent and not age.

You're working under the assumption that kids are retarded with a bit of kike propaganda on top. It might've been true for you, but a properly raised child can make smart decisions. hint: most of them will say no, and some of the edgier boys will chicken out

The guy is motherfucking stallman, do you need any more proof of autism? If someone ever makes an autism welfare system, they would approve him based on his FSF membership alone.

Stallman is always right.

Stop swallowing modernist revisionist history. Pederasty was only practised by the rich upper class (what a surprise, rich people being degenerates), but faggotry was shunned by society. The punishment for being caught a fag ranged depending on the state from losing you citizen rights to death by stoning. Ancient Greece was not a 24/7 gay parade with togas.