People keeping citing daily beast articles for their anti trump talking points

The Daily Beast is owned by a company called IAC

iac.com/brands

Guess who's on the board of directors for IAC?

iac.com/about/leadership/board-directors/chelsea-clinton

Chelsea Clinton.

This isn't some Shemitah tier disinfo bullshit, this is the real deal.

The Daily Beast = Correct the Record.

Other urls found in this thread:

thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/24/bernie-bros-celebrate-debbie-wasserman-schultz-s-ouster-as-dnc-head.html
thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/23/chelsea-clinton-s-campaign-crucible.html
ir.iac.com/corporate-governance-document.cfm?DocumentID=11372
web.archive.org/web/20110927113456/http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/chelsea-clinton-joins-board-of-iacinteractive/
archive.is/sf8AF
archive.is/RAJVF
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bump

What a waste. Her father screwing women younger than her must gave affected her studies.

Nice. This is basically what we should be doing with all media sources. Follow the money or family influence and you'll see who is corrupt.

oh very, indeed.

not everyone is a washington spindoctor, maybe they just want to know what's up with some of the stories that get sent to them by normies. It's better to face shit head on than sweep it under the memes.

dodgy AF, but there's a whole team of directors, and another company below them, and then a journalism department and the writers below that. It's considered pretty unseemly for directors to exact much editorial control.

the daily beast is stacked with the kind of liberal arts bernouts that would throw a shitfit if they were censored or forced to tow a party line.

that's a pretty slippery slope, you don't have to dig too hard to find out fox is owned by murdoch and that he's been implicated in hacking and espionage cases, heavily lobbies worldwide for tax breaks, and shits the bed and uses his frontpages for shilling whenever he feels like he's losing control.

journalism's a mug's game.

she could sit on her ass and do nothing and she'd still live as a comfortable millionaire

do that and you'll learn plenty of shady things about the trumps

unless sycophancy blinds your view to reality

truth is that both sides are so corrupt that you can't even really use corruption as a claim against either of them.

They go to college to meet a man. If that fails, they get a masters. If that fails, they get a phd. If that fails, they die an academic cat lady, or the rich ugly woman.

I don't think the lugenpresse cares about that.

I learned about this from the Berniefags, it was the Daily Beast pushing CtR's Berniebro thing.

thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/24/bernie-bros-celebrate-debbie-wasserman-schultz-s-ouster-as-dnc-head.html

they acknowledge the email scandal, corruption, wikileaks, DNC backstabbing, and powerbroking. That article is pretty damaging to the Hillary campaign without being sensationalist. Shouldn't Chelsea have banned it?

I'm not saying you don't have anything, but you just have one fact. If you want to dig you could collect the names of former Daily Beast journalists, see when they were fired or resigned, and research the ones that were just prior to or just after Chelsea Clinton taking a position on the IAC board.

If one of them started flinging shit then they had a change of editorial policy and if two did then you can accuse them of clearing house. With a narrative you have a story that can break on an outlet, anything short of that you're just shopping around conspiracy theories.