Best communist leader in your opinion

what's your favorite communist leader?
and why?

me first


Fidel Castro


this:

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WHD8h6TrC-4
youtube.com/watch?v=GixKLkai6uA
8ch.net/leftypol/res/704371.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

yes, i do really think that north korea is a proletariat utopia, you better check another sources dude, the US propaganda isn't the best you know.

youtube.com/watch?v=WHD8h6TrC-4

youtube.com/watch?v=GixKLkai6uA

im totally against north korea political heritage government though.

Lenin. The revisionist scum sided with the Great War and later Kerensky, yet then came Lenin to tell them to be actual fucking revolutionaries and seize power.

Ernst Thälmann
A worker, leader and fighter
Reading his biography and speeches is proof of what an badass he was.

Mothafuckin TITO

protip if it's not anarchist it's also not communist.

this is why statist communists are the biggest retards on earth. They are willing to shove their heads so far in the sand they'll say black is white to try to desperately claim that something of their idolized, failed attempt worked in any way.

north korea it's still in the intermediate phase to a communist society, which can't be achieved in short time, it's a long-term project, in which there can't be reactionary influences.

if there isn't a state regulating the economy and stuff, how you anarcokids even belive it could be an organized revolution and government?

pd: im trying not to being tankie, but you make me, comrad.

I'm sure lil kim loses sleep over the fact that the he can't bring north korea to the final stage of communism quicker. I can't think of a single way that king fearless leader kim would benefit from exploiting harnessesing the skills of the people withing his feudalist communist country.

Both of you, kill yourself.

Anarchists refuse to accept that their ideology has had even less success. Learn some basic fucking Marxist theory rather than memes you learned on reddit.

And North Korea is officially not communist. And beyond that it's self-evident from their own propaganda that they're nor socialist in any way or form. See this thread and you might actually become a real socialist rather than a edgy contrarian.

Sorry, here's the link: 8ch.net/leftypol/res/704371.html

The Cuban Revolution is the most normie-friendly of them all. People are just less afraid to voice support for Cuba compared to the others because the West wasn't able to manufacture a genocide from it's "dictator." It did have some serious emancipatory potential at the start though, but they ended up becoming a vassal of Soviet revisionism.

I…I don't know about this board sometimes….

Sankara, Tito, and Ho where pretty great

Samdech Heng Samrin.

Durruti

if duruti so great why he kill himsefl?
thats suiicide

No, it's not, trusting tankies is.

Tito.

they seem to have tackled counter-revolutions, fam

Unironically Hoxha and pic related

Joseph V. D. Stalin
Because muh based M-L USSR

Fredrich Honecker
Because muh steroids in olympics

A revolution isn't a fucking debate, numb nuts. Every communist will have to be an authoritarian to his enemies.

He was against those pea-headed arfocentrists and black nationalists.

...

Holy shit that is some powerful delusion you have there. That's North Korean populace level delusion.

my boy Tito

Why not just be a fascist and go back to pol

As amusing as I find your concept that repressing capitalists is fascism to be I'm just going to ignore your incoherent ramblings and be glad none of you free speech liberals will ever manage to be in charge of anything.

Easily, Tito.

There is a difference between repressing capitalists and reactionaries and silencing dissent within your own ranks. One contributes to and is essential to the revolution, the other is potentially disastrous as the party begins to lose the ability to scrutinize itself and change course when necessary. Party members begin to distort inconvenient truths in order to avoid punishment. Their superiors then operate from a distorted view of the situation, making it impossible for them to remedy many problems. Everybody caught in this dynamic may be a convinced socialist, yet the results can be extremely harmful for socialism. If state power is later acquired by counter-revolutionaries, then the same apparatus that was used to stifle dissent within the party can easily silence opposition to the restoration of capitalism. This is what happened in both Russia and China.

Ηoxha

what about allende?, if it wasn't for te US he would achieve the first true communist state in the world.

probably Lenin. But because he was an excellent revolutionary

...

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEK!

Tell me more about how they had to come to Greece in the 90s, in order to get capital to build it.

He did the best he could, but isolation is a shit tactic

Anyway,

Lenin did everything wrong.
Lenin best grill.

OK.

Tito was the man. Turned an almost entirely rural nation into an exporter of cars (that Westerners were too stupid to maintain).

Vladimir Lenin (obviously)

Nicolae Ceausescu - he was the only communist leader who actually followed the path of Lenin. May he rest in power.

WORST GRILL EVER!


CARS FOR THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE FOR EVER!

Ol saint Nicolae's orphanage fiasco is personally responsible for much of my childhood being ruined by two hyperretarded Romanian adoptees, so I can't be objective about him.

The government fell and was replaced with capitalism which didnt provide shit unlike Hoxha.Of course they would rather go to a more developed country which was right next to them than live in a poor one.
Never claimed that it isnt a shithole now.It wasnt when Hoxha was around


gif related

Ismail, go back to /marx/.

Didn't everybody else in the Eastern bloc fucking hate him?

...

I didn't realize that Lenin's goal was to turn his country into a quasi-Juche shithole.


Yes.

The Soviet Union hated him because he had a big mouth, yet he never went far enough as to warrant an invasion like in Hungary or Czechoslovakia.

The Soviet satellites hated him because he wasn't loyal enough to the USSR.

Albania hated him because lol revisionism.

Yugoslavia hated him because he was a fucking asshole. Tito personally disliked Ceausescu as well. After meeting with Ceausescu, Tito wrote about how not only were his ideas shit, but that he had a genuinely horrid personality as well.

On the other hand:

The US loved him because they thought they could play him against the Soviets. Nixon visited Romania and he visited the US as well.

China loved him because his wife and Mao's wife liked each other. Mao's wife told her that she needed to be more important in her country's politics, which resulted in her becoming the second-most powerful person in Romania, and consequently also the most hated person in Romania.

North Korea was head over heels for him because he and Kim Il-Sung were butt-buddies. Ceausescu felt inspired when he visited North Korea after the launching of Juche in 1972, so much so that he applied parts of it to Romania. And the result was it becoming the second-worst Eastern Bloc nation. (The first being Bunkerstan, obviously.)

You'd have thought paying off that IMF loan in a timely manner (at the expense of his own people no less) would have at least warranted some help from them in preventing his fate.

I used to go on revleft before I knew leftypol existed, Isamil goes on Holla Forums too holy fucking shit spooky.

Best Korea!

Probably Lenin, then an honorable mention for Gramsci, because of their utter resolve.

Sankara and Tito tbh

...

So, anyone that wasn't fullCrazy hated him.
Makes sense. IMO he had nothing to do with socialism. He was simply a dictator.

Exepto for Hoxha, who didn't like anyone

only one I like

Pol Pol

lol ok

heinrich himmler was neither a communist nor a leader
go fuck yourself nazi

He said communist leader, not CIA puppet.

...