Before you go: "yet another pedo thread go fuck yourself", Consider the following:

Before you go: "yet another pedo thread go fuck yourself", Consider the following:
Thoughts on this? How do we change it?
(If you don't agree debate me.)

Other urls found in this thread:

cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2011/10/eroticizing-dominance-grooming-sexual-predatory-behaviors-as-norms/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Go fuck yourself.

Theres a line. Come on. Your mental illness-filled head should atleast have a fine line.

Add one to the list.

Also:

this tbh fam

Your childish name-calling will get you nowhere.

Go check the law user. they are the ones drawing lines wrong.

samefag

Maybe you can make a moral argument against that sort of behavior. You can't make a (good) moral argument in favor of pedophilia. Just because it's legal to distribute "gore porn" doesn't mean that it should be legal to distribute child porn. The law doesn't always make sense, but you can usually formulate some sensible argument around the line of thinking behind any given law. It's also legal to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, and consume fast food. These things are all terrible for one's health, and therefore could be said to have no or very little value in a grand societal context. Yet, they're legal because Americans value civil liberty more than they value their own well being. No second party is hurt by one's decision to consume harmful substances. Children, on the other hand, are always going to be hurt by the production of child pornography.

As for gore porn, you could make the argument that the "damage has already been done". In other words, the distribution of media that contains absurd violence is in no way harmful to other human beings; the subjects of the photos or videos have already received the brunt of the violence that was enacted against them, and, in most cases, the media in question was not created for the explicit purpose of sating the demand for this type of media. Taking a photo of an already dead body, no matter how "serene" or "gory", is similar to a passerby watching a train wreck. It's a gruesome sight that naturally occurred without the photographer's direct influence.

When I say that something, "doesn't harm other people" I mean in an explicitly physical context. Yes, it's possible to inflict some emotional and mental distress on a loved one by consuming harmful substances. Yes, it's possible to inflict emotional and mental harm on the loved ones of the subjects of "gore porn", and it's possible to argue that 1) the industries surrounding harmful substances (tobacco, alcohol, fast food, etc) somehow inflict suffering on tangentially affected groups, and 2) that there may be organizations that exists to create and distribute "gore porn" in order to meet some market demand. However, these instances of suffering are always secondary, and of lesser concern, than a person's own primary well being. It is possible for a mentally and emotionally unstable person to "cope" through this type of suffering and also meet their basic, biological needs and ultimately survive. I am not saying that emotional or mental suffering is unimportant; I am saying that, compared with your immediate physical well being, it will always be a secondary concern.

Child pornography is potentially harmful to a child's mental and physical well being. Children are kidnapped, raped and abused, and often times murdered. They are imprisoned and live like slaves that exist for the sole purpose of satisfying their master's twisted sexual needs. They are treated like subhumans. If this somehow isn't the case, then the children will likely suffer a great deal of emotional distress, which can lead to severe mental problems in their adulthood. Children are not developmentally equipped to perform or even understand sexual activity. Therefore, the creation of child pornography has lasting, negative physical and mental ramifications for the children in question.
It's a l e g i t i m a t e m e d i c a l p r o c e d u r e that is performed by professionals. Prove that it isn't a legitimate medical procedure. Maybe you can argue that it's unnecessary, but you can't even imply that it's mandatory by law. You
DON'T HAVE TO GET THE PROCEDURE DONE YOU STUPID FUCKING NIGGER STOP BRINGING THIS SHITTY POINT UP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
If your dick is clipped and you don't like it, then blame your parents, because they gave consent to have the procedure done. See that? T H E Y G A V E C O N S E N T on your behalf. Children cannot give consent.

So I can fuck kids if their parents let me and what the kid say is irrelevant? :^)

That still is made without medical reasons most of the time.
I will just let this thread die and invite you to read the papers on >>>/younglove/34274
Have a good day

lol nothnx

...

It's not legal for 16 year olds to enlist in the military though.

this tbh

This thread requires moar loli.

...

...

...

...

MODS !
get this pedo shit outta here

...

Fun hater.

And legally raped, on video.

More people like Trump (not only him and his god of course).

...

Pedofriends should just start posting lolis instead of trying to reason with the abyss.

...

...

I think she fills out this leotard pretty well.

that doesn't make pedophilia OK, that just makes everything you tried listing as "makes pedophilia OK" not OK

It may not be OK, but Laura is still hot.

Our QUEEN!

only for the mentally retarded. i want real women.

Laura is as REAL as Holla Forums gets… get used to the change!

all that stuff seems pretty reasonable

pick one you loser

enjoy cuck

i think you got rejected. ain't that right, boy? so you go to kiddos who are too innocent to realize how ugly and shitty of a cunt you are.
you've never met a woman is my bet.

are you a woman?

Why? If you date a single mother you get the best of both worlds.

soo… when did i say you were a virgin? it's actually a good argument though. i'm figuring if you had sex and loved a woman you'd probably get off that retarded kiddie shit.
no holes in my argument, it's the theory that since you never got down with a lady, the only females you got close to were kids, and your fucked brain learned to wank off to them.
conditioning, it makes some cunts super-cunts.

I'm a dad, and I'm still here. So fuck your theory.

stop cherrypicking. you represent no one in general, you're just a dude. you don't represent the pedos as a whole.

Well then come up with a better argument. Dick.

Not only is your sexuality disgusting and damaging to society as a whole, you're so emotionally under-developed that life probably holds little meaning for you anyway, and similarly, you would pose no tangible benefit to anybody whatsoever. In fact, you seem semi-aware of that last fact, knowing that you couldn't provide any form of excitement to a grown woman and the best you could do is offer to pay for everything like a proper schmuck.
Those 'arguments' you presented only support the idea that pedos should be castrated, if not executed and flung into mass graves.

yet another pedo thread go fuck yourself

porn is different from gore.
You can't really harm someone who is already dead.
And also, it's probably illegal to profit off of videos of people killing each other and selling that.

circumcision should be illegal.

I don't think letting 16 year olds film themselves and post it on the internet is smart idea.
I don't think they should be "arrested", but I do think it should be heavily discouraged. How to do this I don't know.

I mean, you could make the ages the same, or increase it to 18.
I think the age of consent should be lower than the age of enlistment.

Agree with this one. Both should be legal.

yes, user. if we cannot convince them, our guns will.
see you at the uprising, user.

I would only be interested in giving Queen Laura gentel head pats in the nude… what's your problem with that?

nice hitler dubs you laurabphobe

WTF, is this Bailey Jay's little brother?

...

I'm just upset on the gray area when it comes to 2D girls and stuff.
not real = not illegal

I'm just upset on the gray area when it comes to 2D girls and stuff.
not real = not illegal

"Children" aren't hurt by the consumption of child porn, but only by the production. It should be:
Production = illegal
Distribution and viewing = legal
:^)

Yes

no production = nothing to distribute.
do you have brain damage?

There is still the files that have already been created.
The problem here is I don't want the government telling me wich byte sequences I am allowed to have on my computer. If the CP was "pirated" no harm was creted by downloading it.
The most famous videos have people that are already caught by the police anyway.

WOW THIS COLOR SCHEME FAR OUT IT'S LIKE A DISCO THREAD

If we kiss D's ass we get official pedo threads back is my current line of thought

Someone bold text and let's get this party started

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

COME WATCH PEDOS GET BTFO

cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP
cytu.be/r/Wark_TCAP

For fuck's sake. ¬¬
Take a look at this guy. This is one of the greatest scientists of all time, the Father of Modern Chemistry. He married a 13yo girl. They had a sucessful marriage and she even helped him do science.
Written works show is Romeo and Juliet, mother of Jesus Christ that depicted what was normal at the time.
I could give you many other of examples of sucessful happy marriages with early teens.
No one should be arrested for wanting to fuck teens. We are biologically programed to do that because that's an evolutionary advantage.

Dubs and I dump the rest of this cutie :3

what did he mean by this?

It means wesay nice things to him to get him in a good mood then ask him to be nicer to pedos.
Okay so now I will try to summon Dysnomia:

2D>3DPD always
Liking lolicon doesn't make you a pedophile.
DO NOT talk to Dysnomia
Holla Forums is a brazilian board

wow i dont give a shit

So, use bullets instead of rope?

Watching a video of a loaf of bread being baked is the same as baking a loaf of bread.

Don't be such a pedophobic biggot :^) or there will be consequences.
We prefer to use love, cuteness and meme warfare but if we have to we will use our weaponized lolis >>7138238

Not funny. Somewhere in the world a loaf of bread had to be baked so you could watch that video.

You're missing one very important fact.

I was molested and still have reoccurring, sometime intrusive, fantasies that make me feel violated and ashamed to be a boy

It was already baked, downloading the video doesn't change that.

Since this is such a great metaphor on that same world the bread would be baked anyway and videos are onlymade to getmore videos.
Meanwhile the governemt is trying to protect loaves of bread by making videos of breads being baked illegal even if the bread says is wants to be baked or if it bakes itself. And the same (((governemnt))) is profiting by buying and selling bread internationally.

The producers of bakery instructional videos do it for either attention or profit. If not for people like you those videos would not be made, and bread would not be thrown away just for your own selfish need to learn baking.

Some producers are wasteful monsters with no respect for food, this is true. However, you cannot overgeneralize. Most instructional video makers are normal sensible people that wouldn't waste food in this manner, and likely eat the bread afterwards or share it with the homeless.

...

...

...

Calling it bait.
Just in case it's not, see pic related and studies thread on >>>/younglove/ Data shows you are an excepion.

cp producers fuck their kids anyway. They trade videos for other videos. There is no profit/fame from producing original content.

So, what's your point? Baking will never be legalized because flour cannot consent.

It's a social control mechanism.

Remember when we found out that the FBI was operating something like 21 out of 28 known darknet CP websites?

Remember when we found out that Occupy Wall Street was infiltrated by FBI agents provocateur to bring it down?

Remember when Moot lost control of the 4chan servers and the justification was CP, with FBI agents raiding the server farm and threatening to unplug if he didn't comply?

Who do you think has the largest database of CP in the world? I'd bet money that it's the motherfucking FBI, and that 90% of CP spam on chans can be traced back to them (and will be eventually thanks to our buddies at the NSA–if you think this is unlikely, read up on what happened to the Stasi after the wall fell).

Just by using a free speech platform like chan boards you're going to be exposed to that content, and that means they can turn up the heat at will if your politics ever start leaking. That was the plan, anyway, I don't think it's working out for them.

Also the whole concept of thoughtcrime is retarded but that's just obvious. You don't get arrested for watching a video of a homicide, right?

These are cultural anomalies, they do not count in modern-day, first world countries. You probably think Yemen and Haiti are decent societies too.

No, dude. When I masturbate, I remember bits and piece of my molestation which upsets me slightly. I've come to ignore it or simply accept it when it's bad but I find myself stopping constantly, those are called flashbacks.

bump

Why do you bump when nobody gives a shit?

thanks for the bump

Why don't you answer the question?

I bump because these threads trigger the most butthurt.

I just landed a turd that smelt so revoltingly horrific, that even Satan himself would be digusted. Being constipated for 4 days didn't help… it had all that time to 'ripen'. Even Lord Saron would not have claimed that shit for himself, I'm telling you!

Guess you'd better shoot yourself.


This analogy just got run off the rails. But all the people saying "lol can't consent" aren't basing that opinion on an objective assessment of the facts. It should instead be based on comprehension of the material covered in a sex education curriculum. Saying someone who has all the relevant information in their possession can't give informed consent is fucking asinine. Sex isn't hard to understand. If you don't understand sex by the time you're, say, 15, you're probably literally mentally retarded.


So much this.

The FBI did nothing wrong

...

"Lower the Age of Consent to 4 years of age" - POTUS

They did host CP for months, upgraded the server and advertized the website they seized to make it grow from a small slow server with 11 thousand users to 150 thousand users, only to not be able to make convictions because they refuse to disclose the hacking procedure.
And that was just Playpen. I wonder what they are going to do with Elisyum now.

I'm fine with reducing it to 13 with explicit declaration of consent while iincreasing jail time for real rapes if the victim is under 18.

Holla Forums always had a sense for moral behavioror
a very diverse set of morals

If you don't understand sex by the time you're 4, you're probably literally mentally retarded.
It's really not a difficult concept to grasp. I'll never understand why people are fine with children fooling around with each other, but as soon as you bring a mature, responsible adult into the equation it's suddenly a bad thing.

13 is still too high but its much better than 18 tbh

this

Teenagers, who have reached puberty and are developing natural sexual tendencies, are exploring their sexuality. Society is largely fine with their antics, but even they are subject to laws that govern how people behave (i.e. if a young 15 year old kid beats his girlfriend, he's going to be tried as a juvenile delinquent and charged with "assault" or "domestic abuse" charges or whathaveyou). So, it's misguided to say that, "nobody cares when children fool around" because that's not true. Every young couple is being observed by the watchful eye of their guardians and superiors within their community. We're not talking about them when we refer to the object of your typical pedo's affection, are we? No, we're talking about young, prepubescent kids.

Pedos typically want to prey upon a helpless child and get their sexual gratification. Children are weaker and less experienced than their adult counterparts. Their brains haven't fully developed, and they just haven't experienced much of life, so they can be easily manipulated, by a grown-ass person, and made to do things that they might otherwise not do, or to do things that they don't even fucking understand. Basically, pedos want to actually rape and exploit kids most of the time, they're not interested in a so-called "loving relationship". That's laughable, retarded bullshit. Anyway, even if your "loving relationship" bullshit is true, you're still ignoring the fact that the adult will have all of the power in the relationship, and that's not a good thing. Yes, there are power dynamics in every relationship, but the typical adult relationship is not static; the participants both "struggle for dominance" so to speak, they do different things to try and manipulate one another. To clarify, say a man saves some money and buys his wife a fine necklace, or a woman goes out of her way to wear a certain outfit or prepare a special meal; these things are done with the specific intention to illicit a reaction from the recipient. A healthy relationship is about learning; you learn and act in accordance with your spouse's expectations, or subvert those expectations in ways that can evoke the type of response you want. The ultimate goal is the mutual benefit and satisfaction of both participants. Conversely, an unhealthy relationship is predicated on said power dynamics being skewed in favor of one single recipient, such that his or her demands are exclusively sought, and this is usually attained through coercive and overpowering tactics, be they physical or psychological. Children are not capable of understanding the finer mechanisms behind a relationship. Children have no concept of this type of dynamic between people, they're absolutely helpless against the psychological tactics of an adult. The adult will always have the mental and physical capacity to overpower a child, and therefore any potential "relationship" between the two will always play out in the adult's favor, not to mention the adult will likely have some financial stability that he can use to fund the relationships material requirements. I haven't even pointed out that children aren't physically equipped to engage in sexual activity, given that their bodies haven't even reached puberty, and that sexual activity between a grown person and an underdeveloped child will likely result in some type of traumatic injury.

So, there you go, pedocucks. You're single minded, selfish hedonists who want to prey on a developing child for the sake of experiencing a bit of sexual gratification. You're like sex fiend junkies. Therefore, you're degenerate kikes who should either learn to realize that you're touched in the fucking head and that you need help or fucking burn at the stake tbh.

The reason CP should be illegal is because it is messed up as fuck. There are some good points into what you're saying, however, but a lot of those things should also be illegal and some shouldn't. Why? Because they are MESSED UP.

Sorry, but I am a moralfag.

Videos of people being tortured and killed doesn't incentive people actually getting tortured and killed

Don't see how those are related.

Pretty sure you're misinterpreting something there, or you do live in some silly state.

Pretty sure the distribution is illegal, not recording.
You can get killed for being outside, should be ban leaving your house?

Not everyone has a chance to get in porn, but anyone can pay for a prostitute. The scope is nowhere near the same.

Children have the right to choose their own sexual partners.

Parents should choose their children's sexual partners

This is ok, more like this

A mature and responsible adult would be mindful of the child's needs and treat them as an equal.

Children are not ready for penetrative sex before the age of 10. That's just common sense.

A pedo like you can't tell the difference between fiction and non-fiction.

Your opnion


For a child, it could be.
No one is fine with this.
Yes, adults should fuck adults. Teenagers should fuck teenagers, kids should fuck kids.

blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2011/10/eroticizing-dominance-grooming-sexual-predatory-behaviors-as-norms/

Exactly

No, they don't

Absolutely

In an ideal world, sure, but you must realize that not everyone has a child's wellbeing at heart.

...