Call other people cucks

Top kek

Yeah, that's it. You haven't actually read the study or analyzed his methods, but there's no way that people who support a candidate that wants to block parts of the internet and loosen libel laws could have an authoritarian inclination. Damn commies.

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft to remove hate speech across Europe

thejakartapost.com/life/2016/06/02/facebook-twitter-youtube-and-microsoft-to-remove-hate-speech-across-europe.html

lmao, can't say anything critical of journalists, journalism, or the media without those cunts shrieking MUH FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

What the hell does this have to do with anything? In fact, how is it even equivalent? These businesses can do whatever they want with their own sites, this isn't the same as the government threatening them with force.

Trump could literally rape a newborn on live TV and you stupid shits would rationalize it.

There's a difference between criticizing the media and threatening to use your power as president to ruin media outlets you don't like.

hmmm… can you think of any ideologies that reject both the free market and sjws?

That's not relevant. I disagree with their decision, but surely you realize they are private companies and thus have the right to do delete content they dislike? The government blocking parts of the internet is a violation of the First Amendment. Twitter removing content isn't.

1. Given that all three are almost monopolistic in the power they have over their respective domains, the "they're private companies they can do whatever they want :^)" argument no longer applies. Really, what's the alternative to a site like Facebook for Westerners? Well if you have a problem just sign up with VK user - you do know Russia, right?
2. It bothers no-one that companies are conspiring with the EU to restrict free speech?

Considering the media's acted towards Trump in a way it hasn't acted towards any other candidate I can't really blame him.

They're not conspiring, they are doing what the market demands.

Point this out to anyone and you get the 100 GORILLIONS speech.

See

Given the power each has over their respective domains in most Western nations, the "if you don't like it just invent your own social networking site!" doesn't really apply.

user, this isn't some vital resource or even a useful source of information. It's what normies use to feed their egos.

...

And Holla Forums sides with the libertarians

gawker.com/this-is-how-hillary-clinton-gets-the-coverage-she-wants-1758019058

Yeah, the media are truly an objective, independent fourth estate

It is what it is. Moralizing the status quo will not make it any easier to criticize.

It does from a legal standpoint. Again, I disagree with them removing content, but it's perfectly legal, unlike the government blocking parts of the internet.

...

again

well when you're a dunning-kruger-riddled dilettante with a penchant for self-unaware bluster that does tend to happen

m8 those ideologies aren't coming back. I'm sorry Holla Forums but Marxism, socialism etc are in the dustbin of history.

The future of the Left is a boot labelled "idpol" stamping on the face of humanity, forever. Enjoy "capitalism with a feminist, anti-racist, jewish LGBT face"

dont recall that being the answer to the question but while we're at it trump isn't going to usher back the glorious age of the white lost eden that never happened either

Okay then, what should we do?

Because I would literally, honestly rather kill myself than embrace the politics of people who insist that they are "realists" shoving red pills down everyone's throats.

This is ignoring the fact that capitalists apologists are literally not "left" by definition.

You mean when American wealth inequality was at its lowest point? When American unions were at their strongest? When American real wages actually kept track with GDP?

Or do you mean how we view the '50s now, i.e. "Only fucking white males benefited from it therefore it was wrong"

I don't have the answers, and the "alt-right" or whatever Holla Forumsacks are calling ourselves now don't really have them either - and if we did we'd never agree over anything.

I just think it's easier to push for Leftist politics when there are greater commonalities among the people - not when everyone identifies as feminist/non-white/LGBT first and worker second

You mean the post-war economic boom that lead to a rapid increase of population and a generation of anti-intellectualism and jingoism? The same generation that is dying off just as violent crime rates are going down for reasons that are 100% totes a coincidence and not because they couldn't parent their own kids?

Or do you mean immediately after when the neoconservative clique warped the economy into a permanent cycle of short-term gambles where economic productivity soared lightyears ahead of real wages?

kys

You do realize there was more government regulation and far higher taxes then..

So basically you believe what 99% of the board does?