HOLY SHIT, Holla Forums, WHY IS EVERYTHING SO FUCKING GAY NOWADAYS?

HOLY SHIT, Holla Forums, WHY IS EVERYTHING SO FUCKING GAY NOWADAYS?

WESTERN SOCIETY IS PACKED TO THE GILLS WITH GAY SHIT

OVERT PRO-FAG MESSAGES
REBOOTS WITH FAGS
LEARN FAG THEORY OR ELSE
MUST INCORPORATE DIVERSITY
GAY SHIT FOR CONTROVERSY
VIRTUE SIGNALING WITH PRO-GAY STANCES
HOMO NORMALIZATION PARADES
FAG ACCEPTANCE DAY

THEY'RE TRYING TO CRAM RAINBOWS UP EVERYONE'S ASSHOLE

IF YOU SHOW EVEN THE SLIGHTEST BIT OF MASCULINITY, YOU GET EXILED

HOW THE FUCK DO WE SAVE OURSELVES FROM THIS WORLD WE CREATED?

Other urls found in this thread:

westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/
ashg.org/press/201510-sexual-orientation.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209181
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sparta#Decline_of_the_population
thoughtmaybe.com/all-watched-over-by-machines-of-loving-grace/#top
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Cochran
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25399360
psi.sagepub.com/content/17/2/45.full.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=E7L4V-CbdoQ
advocate.com/bisexuality/2015/08/18/study-half-british-young-adults-not-100-percent-heterosexual
isteve.com/Infectious_Causation_of_Disease.pdf
mentalfloss.com/article/28442/how-rainbow-became-associated-gay-rights).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_and_homosexuality#Soviet_Union
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_history_in_Russia#LGBT_history_under_Stalin:_1933.E2.80.931953
canonandculture.com/are-same-sex-couples-just-like-you/
familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense
archive.is/zRekI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Go back to 4chan

Yeah, I browse both boards.

Better stay on the other one you were browsing before. It will be good for you, and it will be good for us.

Shoot up hollywood, synagogues and politicians instead of schools?

sage

'90s sex ed programs based on gay advocacy rather than education
the guy responsible is now on the Ad Council
his partner runs a billion dollar foundation called Arcus and is big time Clinton donor

Why?

This goes a long way toward explaining why kids are more accepting of fag lifestyles than adults.

I never understood why so many Millennials readily accept fag shit as gospel without even thinking about it.

Sage

Homosexuality is caused by a pathogen. We evolved homophobia as a reaction to that pathogen. Kikes have subverted our civilization and have been working to increase the spread of the gay-germ, among other pathogens.

westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/

As soon as we get the kikes out of our institutions, research can begin on identifying and eliminating the gay-germ, until then just keep them away from your children, this should prevent infection. Of all the problems that we have, homosexuality will be the easiest to deal with. Once we have an inoculation, even the most liberal parents will want to immunize their sons against this disease.

I don't know about any of this because I have literally nothing to do with Western media.
Go watch anime, listen to japanese power metal and play some JRPGs/Fighting games. The "worst" things an uneducated right-wing retard might see are traps but that's because they don't know that traps are inherently right-wing.

The term "homophobia" is a misnomer, though.

No one is afraid of fags.

We just don't like most of them because they're genetically defective and want the entire world to bend over backwards to support the disgusting culture that they've built for themselves.

Anime is the definition of fag shit.

Japanese kids and culture are fucking gay.

Chans are japanese.

If we assume homosexuality to be caused by an infectious disease, then homophobia is the correct term. We have evolved a profound fear of the disease and a strong complusion to destroy the pathogen carrier on sight. This evolutionary response exists in many diverse societies, indicating that the pathogen is ancient and widespread.

Homosexuality is Western culture.

Media is saying this is typical behaviour. Go outside and you'll see that it's not quite so (unless you live in fag central).

How is this even possible?

No, it's eastern, Silly.

Fuck off Dick Spencer


San-Fagcisco needs to be flooded. So does Portland.

...

It is an ancient pathogen, even the Hebrew bible mentions it.


There are many known infections that can cross the blood-brain barrier and reprogram the sexual impulses of a mammal to optimize for pathogen transmission. Mind altering parasites are a relatively new field of biology, attached is interview with a Stanford biologist on these types of diseases.

Homosexuality is genetic, though.

People are born gay.

PROVE IT

...

faggot

...

Homosexuality is not genetic. There are no known gene correlations and it does not run in families.

Sexuality is a function of biology.

Environmental and hormonal factors influence sexuality to a degree, but who we really want to fuck boils down to how we develop in the womb.

The differences in the DNA of gay and straight men echo these sentiments.

There are no genetic differences between homosexual and heterosexual men. Homosexuality in not a genetic disease, it is a pathogenic disease. It seems to be spread primary by sexual contact between homosexual men and young boys.

the nigger is correct, EET IS A SEEKNUSS

Holy shit.

This fag-centric tapestry was a prophecy.

Look at how the spectacle of anal sex compels the onlookers to celebrate.

History is definitely cyclical.


Geneticists would disagree with you.

ashg.org/press/201510-sexual-orientation.html

The theory that homosexuality is a genetic mutation is far more plausible than the theory that homosexuality is the result of a germ, anyway.

If a fag rapes a straight guy, that straight guy doesn't stop wanting to fuck women.

This fact is what makes your "gay germ" theory fall apart.

1. Not taking responsibilities for choices is genetic, and not something that can be taught
2. Anus is for pooping, not for entering your misguided penis that mistook a womb for an asshole.
3. low self esteem leads to poor judgement

BUT HELL HOMOSEX IS JUST DNA HAHAHAHAHA OH AIDS

then a gaydar must be

This is probably the reason why kikes promote faggotry.

I think you mean bend over forwards…

:^)

This is why homosexuals are programmed to primarily rape young boys. The young are more vulnerable to infection and their brains can be more easily restructured by the parasite.

>ashg.org/press/201510-sexual-orientation.html

You obviously didn't read the article, it refers to the epigenome, not the genome. The epigenome is a partially heritable set of methylation markers which can control gene expression. Homosexuals having a distinct epigenome is perfectly in line with the gay-germ theory, as modification of methylation markers in the developing brain would be one of the main methods of action by the gay-germ. Many infectious diseases are known to modify the epigenome.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209181

I reiterate, homosexuality is not genetic, it is infectious in origin. The gay-germ parasite infects young boys, restructures their brains and modifies their behavior to maximize for pathogen transmission.

basically this
even if you're gay, you choose to behave in a degenerate fashion

Hell, the only way you could argue for "natural" is via a hormonal disorder in the womb, but that would lead you to looking into the long term effects of the pill and other xenoestrogens being dumped into our water supply, and we can't have that

he posted on an imageboard

shouldn't you be NASCAR or something there Lyle?

The Army cadet in one of the images you posted was raped by a fag at the age of nine, and he's pictured with his girlfriend.

If your theory was true, then he wouldn't be anywhere near women because the "gay germ" would have changed his sexuality.

No germ on this planet can turn a straight man gay, and you can't come up with any scientific sources to prove otherwise.

Epigenetics is modern lysenkoiso (hello comrade) and the vast majority of its impact on development and heritability been overplayed by the jewish media trying to downplay the role of genes.

You're not fooling anybody.

What the fuck are you talking about?

(this is translate version)
Pretty simple
Scorched earth.
We cannot look to the past to rebuild the future. instead we can only burn what we have and restart

прилично једноставна
Сцортцхед земља .
Не можемо гледати у прошлост за обнову будућност . уместо тога само може да сагори што имамо и Рестарт

првобитно верзија

Can you give us some background on that quote?

It's compelling.

Serbian:

Gej ljudi ne reprodukuju svoje gene na nove generacije stoga evolucionu da bi trebao postojati " rođen gej " je potpuno nelogično , jer homoseksualci ne šire svoje gene stoga homoseksualnosti je proizvod okruženju ili hemikalije ( hormoni) ili fizičkog zlostavljanja (Molestation ) da druga je veoma česta sa gej muškarcima.

English:
Gay people don't reproduce their genes on a new generation therefore evolutionary they shouldnt exist "born gay" is totally illogical because gays do not spread their genes on therefore homosexuality is a product of enviroment either chemical (hormones) or physical (molestation) the latter being very common with gay men.


You cannot be "born gay" faggot retard.


i qouted nothing. i simply put my words in english to most chan user can read.

it shows

The gay pathogen can be cured. we must find a way to cure it, but what if it becomes worse? a pathogen made by satan to corrupt man in all forms.

Геј патогена може да се излечи . морамо наћи начин да га излечи, али шта ако постане горе ? патоген од стране Сотоне да корумпираног човека у свим облицима .

No disease is 100% effective. Some people have better immune systems than others, some people just get lucky. Not every young boy raped by a homosexual will grow up to be a homosexual, though most adult homosexuals report having been raped as children.

I generally agree with this statement, the academic attempts to link low African IQ to the epigenome is pure Lysenkoism. The epigenome is still real and has important biological implications, like with homosexuality for example.

Toxojewosis, the ability of jewish virus transmitted through a TV to infect normal White brains and get them to work against their own self interests.

Whe should fight and restore righteousness to the world.

The most likely is that the gay pathogen started as a mutant trait in a man many years past.
Coincidentally maybe upon his death this pathogen was released? or he spread it through sex. whichever it is it is obviously bad, but can it be stopped? we were unable to find a cure many years ago besides prayer. Prayer seemed to work for thousands of years.
After man stopped their belief in god god gave them over to their vices. the wages of sin are death after all.

Death is the only cure.

Aye. so it be so.

How?


Can you give me a single study or scientific source that cites this "gay pathogen" and its transmission vectors?

Considering that no scientist in the world has found this parasite of which you speak, I have a hard time believing you.

Once again, I must reiterate that no scientific studies reinforce the notion that a germ exists with the power to alter human sexuality.

You show your sin here sodomite.
Repent sinner!
repent or die!
For the orthodoxy must be your cure!
Death to the sinners!
You merely destroy this world , you destroy anything that the world builds! you kill the children the unborn, death of infinity to you! sin that of you do! you are nothing but sin sodomite and must burn in hell. you trust the "science" of men who also tell you to cut off your penis and suck cock. you are a man of sin. treacherous my nature.


A JEW!

How have I destroyed the world by posting anti-fag shit on Holla Forums?

You post PRO fag shit on Holla Forums. only eating their lies. you are a fag. you are a sinner

you are a sodomite.
you take dick in your ass or you would not defend such things

How do you figure that when I posted the OP?

FUCK ME.

user, I was watching Adam Curtis' All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace (part 3), which tells the story of Bill Hamilton who died of the "freak accident" of an aspirin lodged in his gut, while investigating his theory that the HIV-virus was man made.

And now your article says:


user my idea of a consistent universe is taking a beating here

...

I believe that he have a historical example of a society which was destroyed by a variant of the gay-germ. It is recorded that the number of Spartan citizens decreased tenfold between the Persian wars and the Macedonian wars. Spartan women had to shave their heads and dress as boys on their wedding night in order to stand a chance at being impregnated, but even this was not enough.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sparta#Decline_of_the_population


I think that the gay-germ might predate humanity itself. Perhaps we will be able to find a similar pathogen in primates.

It is just a theory, but it is the best theory that we have. Given the current ideological climate, research into the origins of homosexuality is perhaps even more restricted than research into racial differences in cognitive traits.


Though we have plenty of evidence that similar pathogens exist in other mammals.

Considering that I still posted the OP, how is any of that "destroying the world" or being pro-fag?

thoughtmaybe.com/all-watched-over-by-machines-of-loving-grace/#top


and where he then died of a freak accident.

You know why.

>Pic related. Ad on p.27 of the August 2016 issue of Men's Health

I think the tendency of faggots for raping young boys is more simply explained by the male attraction to neoteny (basically youthful features). Post-pubescent females retain a much higher degree of neoteny than post-pubescent men. Therefore, faggots are going to lust after little boys to a much greater degree than straight men lust after little girls.

Faggotry itself is likely a mix of biological/genetic reasons and environment. The "hostile womb" theory makes a lot of sense to me. We have all seen a little boy who we just knew was going to turn out to be a faggot. I knew my cousin was gay since he was 3. He came out of the closet last year in his early 20s. Trust me, he isn't faking it and he wasn't raped by anyone. You could see the faggotry in this kid's eyes when he was just a child. Very effeminate mannerisms and personality. He has a brother only a couple years older, and he is as masculine as can be and straight as an arrow.

Looking at the link between faggotry and early childhood sexual abuse, I think childhood sexual abuse is clearly a factor in corrupting otherwise normal young boys into a life of prolapsed anuses and poz loads.

The above 2 faggots I can sympathize with and somewhat tolerate. My contention is that the majority of faggots are neither of the above though. They are simply sex obsessed degenerates who have conditioned themselves to like it. They have the media telling them it is ok, there is nothing wrong with it. They are already weak and feminized from growing up with a non-masculine father or an absentee father, and their testosterone is lower than it should be because of all the xenoestrogens they ingest. They get curious, start slow with anonymous hookups through social media and dating apps and watching online porn, don't like it much at first but realize how easy it is to get laid when you are willing to fuck guys. They do it enough times, they start to like it and eventually prefer it to pussy.

This is what I have come up with as the best explanation for faggotry and kiddy diddling.

Theories must have scientific backing to hold water, and it's pointless to support theories without such backing.

Fag culture is distasteful to me, but eliminating it will take much more than making up a false theory about fags and trying to spread it.

Truth doesn't fear investigation, so if your theory were true, then it would have gained traction a long time ago.

The fact of the matter is that far more scientific studies point to homosexuality as a genetic mutation than any other proposed cause.

The real kicker is that eliminating homosexuality is not a matter of eugenics or biological engineering.

It's a matter of eliminating the conditions that allowed for the celebration of effeminate subcultures in the first place.

...

It's hilarious because that bitch could never outrun the nigger, and even the ad executives know it.

Only Jack Donovan can save us from this faggotry.

cancer

This is absurd but true.

Plenty of people who aren't even gay want to jump on the fag bandwagon to appear trendy and tolerant.

These are the types of people who show up to fag parades in ridiculous costumes and take classes on queer theory.

Real homosexuals frown on that sort of behavior because their sexuality isn't a lifestyle choice or a vanity piece.

There is no official scientific explanation for homosexuality. Discussion of the topic is banned in academia. All we have to go on is unproven theories. The gay-germ spread by boy-rape is the best theory that we have, and it is the theory most accepted on the dissident scientific right.


It is not a "false theory", it is literally the best theory that we have on the topic, and also the best hope that we have of eliminating this horrible disease.


Our current ideological climate blocks research that could put any ideologically favored group in a bad light. We do not currently have a scientific climate which allows for free investigation.


You have repeated this multiple times, when in fact there exists absolutely no evidence that homosexuality is genetic, there is far more evidence to support the gay-germ theory, including the epigenetic research that you previously posted.


I agree. It is a matter of quarantine and disease control.

Homosexuality is an implicit last stand of white identity. Homophobia is something brought to the West by semitic religions (Judaism, kikestianity and Islam)

You are the cancer killing pol

reported
saged
and hid

Reported for what? Having a different opinion?

Kill yourself schlomo.

nope it's the result of emotional trauma from sexual trauma

...

It's not the best theory because no studies back it up.

Far more studies have been done on the genetic implications of homosexuality, which make those theories more viable than yours.

You can't even give a name to this pathogen or name one medical professional or scientist who endorses your theory.

This "gay germ" theory is no different than the "flat earth" theory.

Gay people don't reproduce their genes on a new generation therefore evolutionary they shouldnt exist "born gay" is totally illogical because gays do not spread their genes on therefore homosexuality is a product of enviroment either chemical (hormones) or physical (molestation) the latter being very common with gay men.

How is it illogical?

Plenty of things happen in the womb that define who we are.

Don't forget about birth defects.

It was too good to pass up

You speak like homosexuality isn't a choice.

You keep repeating this and never post any supporting evidence. Where are the studies showing that homosexuality is genetic? They don't exist, homosexuality is not genetic, it is pathogenic.


It hasn't been identified yet. Homosexuality may in fact be caused by multiple different pathogens.


Professor Gregory Cochran, the leading dissident scientific theorist.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Cochran

I think I've found your problem.

Just be as manly as you can, in public. Women will literally flow to you since actual men are so rare these days. Cucks will then see your sucess and emulate you.

I know two identical twins, one of whom is lesbian and the other is straight. Nice try, asshole.

stop

You know your place.

For most fags, it isn't.

Some straight people jump on the fag bandwagon to appear tolerant or experiment with their sexuality.

These people aren't genuine homosexuals.

Real fags grow up knowing that they are attracted to their own sex.


We're not talking about studies that prove either theory.

We're talking about studies that have been done to establish the facts associated with these theories.

Regarding homosexuality and genetics, there have been plenty of those studies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25399360
psi.sagepub.com/content/17/2/45.full.pdf

You can't provide me with links to any studies done regarding your theory, though.

Why is that?


If it hasn't been identified and no scientist is endorsing your theory, then why are you so sure that it exists?


Are there any other medical professionals or scientists who have endorsed his theories?

Will and Grace and Modern Family normalized homosexuality so the lemmings who inform their worldview by the talmudvision (or the lemmings following the lemmings who do) think being gay is somehow totally normal and acceptable. When I was growing up, we all fucking hated fags. A couple decades of Jew brainwashing caused the public to toss out its moral compass.

A phobia is an irrational fear. If it is a result of a pathogen (which is something that no one who uses the term believes), then it is a rational fear. QED it is not a phobia.

They regularly do, either by being secretly gay, or through having girls 'experiment' with them.

And I don't know if they were originally in the closet, but the only gay older people I ever knew both married lesbians and had kids. I don't know why. One couple had a gay son and lesbian daughter, the other had the most vehemently anti-gay guy I've ever met, who I assume was straight, but also had the most bizzarely wide hips of a fit dude I've ever seen, so I can't rule out genetic causes without better science. And obviously we can't trust the liars common in the field, since they are the same types who think 18 month old kids can be trannies.

Lesbians themselves are a different story.

And I'm not disputing that it could be a pathogen or something, I just haven't seen anything scientific to back that up (but I will look into stuff in this thread.)


I don't have it, but I think the stats show that is more common in certain cases, and lesbianism seems to be much more based on trauma anecdotally. Kind of like almost any chick can be 'bi-'

...

WTF is it with fags and bathrooms? What are they getting at? Is it some salami cutting thing or are they being used for some other nefarious purpose (other than the obvious jew).

...

Weebs confirmed for mentally ill.

I noticed it to OP but there isn't much that can be done other than to just cut the stuff out of your life.

The LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ movement is actually an exercise in a minority seeking social dominance. They don't want your acceptance, they want your approval. And if you don't approve, they want the State to step in and force you to give them money for your wrongthink or go to prison. That's their endgame, and they want no space to be restrained from their influence.


This sounds like parody shit, but I wouldn't be surprised if their next issue is mandatory glory holes in every bathroom stall.

Even the niggers know we're slipping.

youtube.com/watch?v=E7L4V-CbdoQ

>>>/reddit/
>>>/normalfag/
>>>/auschwitz/

...

Wasn't there that study that showed half of UKs kids under 18 are bi or gay.

Makes sense put in that perspective. Thanks.

The UK is the 10th gayest country in the world.

China actually has the most fags, though.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Is that fucking Masha Babko

advocate.com/bisexuality/2015/08/18/study-half-british-young-adults-not-100-percent-heterosexual
Found an article on it its quacking crazy

if there's a gay germ, it's probably toxoplasmosis. the same parasite that makes cat ladies adopt fifty cats and stop caring that they piss and shit everywhere. It's known to cause a wide variety of behavior shifts in mice as well.

Sexuality can be conditioned, and Leftists know it- hell, they did the research. There may be a tiny number of people with hereditary malfunctions that cause them to be homosexual, but mostly it's just tastes and behavior reinforced in at risk individuals (low tier males) through media and society.

the millennial kids who say "oh i'm probably bi" usually still have the normal healthy disgust at the idea of homosexual contact. They just say that shit to be special snowflakes.

Yes we are. You have said repeatedly that homosexuality is genetic and repeatedly provided zero evidence.


Like I said, the political climate precludes any scientist from receiving research funding for on the subject. Though here is a link to the original peer reviewed scientific paper which introduced the gay-germ theory: isteve.com/Infectious_Causation_of_Disease.pdf


I. Homosexual behavior seems optimized for pathogen distribution. The huge sexual partner counts, extreme promiscuity, and waste product fetishism are obviously ideal behaviors for rapid pathogen transmission. In fact, Toxoplasma itself is a common co-morbid parasite of homosexuals.

II. The cycle of homosexual child sexual abuse is extremely apparent, a tiny proportion of the population is responsible for about 40% of child sexual abuse. This combined with the high rate of reported childhood abuse among those men who subsequently grow up to become homosexuals is strong evidence in favor of the gay germ theory.

III. Homosexuality has a high rate of co-morbidity with many other mental illnesses, this can be explained as a side-effect of the brain parasite.

IV. If homosexuality had a non-pathogenic cause, there would be no need for widespread homophobia to evolve. If some men voluntarily leave the reproductive market, this should allow the remaining men easier access to the females of the community. Objectively, a non-pathogenic homosexuality can be viewed as advantageous for the reproductive males. This does not happen in reality, almost every society treats homosexuals with violent revulsion. Homophobia is almost certainly an evolved response to a contagious pathogen threat.


Now you need more? Stop moving the goalposts.


I don't have a better term for the general revulsion induced in healthy men by homosexuals. We can just appropriate homophobia.


Bathrooms are the most efficient location for pathogen transmission and exchange.

Into the oven Jack

God, I hope so

All faggotry being caused by one factor is too simple. The "gay germ" theory has got to be the most outlandish and weakest explanation. It is far more plausibly explained by a combination of biological, social, and environmental factors. See my post here

...

I don't know, unlike you I can have a picture on my computer and not know anything about it or be attached to it.

I'm don't watch anime or anything, I just appreciated the power of jap drawings as reaction pics

And the fact that you get assmad at it and call everyone neets and autists is either projection or pretty clear proof that you don't, in fact belong here.

Think back to shit marketed towards kids, specifically food.

It throws rainbows down your throat, this shit been going on for decades

...

I'm inclined to believe that homosexuality is caused by genetics as opposed to an unknown pathogen because more studies support the former rather than the latter.

You want me to endorse a theory that every medical professional and scientist beyond Cochran and Ewald discount, which is very short-sighted on your part.

Coincidentally, you have summarily dismissed all the studies and material that I have provided for you because it conflicts with your narrative and personal beliefs.

Neither Cochran nor Ewald are medical professionals; their papers were not peer-reviewed, nor did they conduct tests to give basic rigor to their assumptions.

Here's what James T. Martin, MS, PhD, of the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, had to say about the theory of homosexuality being caused by a germ.


Dean H. Hamer, PhD, former Chief of the Section on Gene Structure and Regulation at the Laboratory of Biochemistry at the National Cancer Institute, also wants to see more rigor.


You have not provided me with a single study by medical professionals that supports your theory – only political conjecture and assumptions that don't hold water.

If you can't show me an NIMH study or peer-reviewed paper like the ones I posted that explore a direct link between germs and homosexuality, then you're wasting our time.

I have an anime folder and I don't even know who these characters are.

I'm curious what your belief is of individuals who are homosexual and or bisexual who have realized that practicing such activities leads to eventual moral degeneration and have forgo sexual relations with men and or never had them in the first place. Do you still want them dead even though they wish to not spread such things to the masses?

Take a look at Pixiv some time, the Japs love gay shit.
They've got words for genres of gay porn for fucks sake.

...

Anyone claiming bisexuality is a fraud.

You're either attracted to the opposite sex or the same sex.

So-called bisexuals are just experimenters.

No studies support a genetic hypothesis for homosexuality.


You want me to endorse the conventional genetic hypothesis, which cannot pass the most basic logical scrutiny. Homosexuality cannot be genetic because these would not be passed on.


Every one of them would also endorse the position that no genetic differences in intelligence exist between European and Africans.

Let's agree on some basic principles:

1. No one knows what causes homosexuality, the topic is simply not studied due to ideological constraints.

2. Faggots are clearly a revolting disease that must be exterminated. All healthy men agree that this is the case, it is our innate instinct.

3. A logically sound theory exists which describes homosexuality as a pathogen. This theory explains all of the peculiar characteristics of homosexuality, it explains the method of transmission and explains our homophobia as a genetic response to the disease.

What I advocate is that the nationalist right adopts the gay germ as our preferred explanation for homosexuality, here are some reasons why we should do so:

1. The gay germ theory allows us to formulate a non-theological framework for preventing growing homosexual entryism into our movement. It explains our natural hatred of homosexuality as an evolutionary response to a horrible disease. A response that is natural and completely independent of religious dogma. Modern European nationalists are simply responding to the same pathogen threat as the ancient Judeans.

2. Attacking homosexuality on solid biological grounds allows us to avoid having to rationalize our innate biological revulsion into a contrived moralistic argument. Homosexuality is simply a dangerous infectious disease that must be eradicated, we know this on an intuitive instinctual level.

3, The gay germ theory explains the political behavior of homosexuals. They are the human equivalent of zombie ants whose brains have been hijacked by a parasitic fungus. Homosexuals are zombies who only live to perpetuate their infection, and will tirelessly work to modify our society in such a way as to make it safe for them to continue to spread their disease.

Accepting the gay germ theory is the first step to a final solution of the faggot problem, this is why faggots are so terrified of it.

Interestingly, you're completely right. The earliest associated use of the rainbow with regard to the LGBT movement was 1978 (which also brought us the rainbow flag) (mentalfloss.com/article/28442/how-rainbow-became-associated-gay-rights). Skittles adapted "Taste the Rainbow", likely some time between 1979 and 1982, because the use of the slogan was a result of the candy's sale in the United States (it was originally from the U.K.), and the slogan itself was developed by a marketing firm in New York. It's hard to tell if it was the intent originallly with Tart n Tinys, which as I understand it, originally was multi-colored on their first release in the 70's, but they went out of their way to add new flavors (thus, presumably new colors) on their current release, likely contributing towards working to a rainbow. Lucky Charms did not have rainbow shaped marshmallows until 1992, but it's a little more deniable than the others because rainbows are directly tied into the marketing of the cereal, being that under a rainbow is where a leprechaun stores his shekels gold.

I am not a fan of doing that for two reasons.

1) It's a loaded term. The purpose of the phobia component is for lefty fag huggers to go "what are you, chicken?" to us. There is nothing brave in their position on the issue.
2) It's meaning isn't actually explicitly homosexuality. Homophobia is derived of two words Homo, meaning "same" and "phobia" meaning "irrational fear of". Taken together Homophobia is not the irrational fear of homosexuals, but the irrational fear that we're the same [as homosexuals].

It appears to me that both the words homo and phobia are products of a linguistic trap to make us appear as though we, the normal functional men, are some kind of group of hysterical self-loathing faggots. Both root words need to be discarded in my opinion. In favor of what? I'm not an etymologist, so I can't tell you for sure. But the term, as it works now, does us no favors.

Is there any evidence that homosexuality was evolved though? As much as I hate this word, homophobia could very well be a "social construct". Libtards jump to that conclusion way too readily, but we should not make the opposite mistake and immediately jump to evolution and natural selection as an explanation for everything. Reality is a mix of the two, but heavily skewed toward biological explanations.

Is monogamy natural? Not really. I've seen numerous genetic studies that show far fewer pre-historic men managed to reproduce vs pre-historic women. It is likely that in our natural state, alphas would end up with small harams while most betas were lucky to rape a less desirable woman before they died an early death.

Monogamy likely only became widespread as civilization developed, and we realized that the tribe was better off and stronger if every man were guaranteed a woman and a means to pass on their lineage. Ordering society like this ensured all men were invested in the long term health and stability of a civilization, and didn't waste their energy and life fighting with other men for a chance to procreate.

Thinking along these same lines, for early civilizations, strength came in numbers. A man who was having his sexual urges satisfied by other men, was a man whose sexual energy wasn't being applied toward procreation. Ideally, every single nut he has should bring the possibility of pregnancy with it.

Guaranteeing each man in a tribe has one and only one woman to reproduce with, while restricting all other outlets of sexual release (besides raping the women of another conquered tribe) maximizes the number of children each man has and guarantees his investment in the tribe long term.

Monogamy doesn't make sense when it comes to natural selection, as monogamy only hinders the ability of the fittest men to reproduce. Being naturally disgusted by homosexuality doesn't make sense when it comes to natural selection, as the fittest men will still be fucking their 10/10 qt cavewoman harams. Restricting sexuality in this manner only has a benefit when we start to organize in larger tribes and form more advanced civilizations.

I posted three, which is more than you can say for your theory.


I don't want you to endorse anything; I want you to stop wasting my time with theories that lack rigor and support.


Agreed, but that doesn't mean that a lack of evidence should compel us to blindly support any theory that gels with our individual political beliefs, which is what you are doing.


Your theory lacks rigor, so it is not logically sound.


See? You want to make it political instead of scientific, just like the crackpots who endorsed the Earth-centric theory of the universe.


Are you admitting that you only disagree with the purported connections between genetics and homosexuality because those connections conflict with your religious beliefs?


You're only attacking it because of your religious beliefs, not because there's anything inherently wrong with it beyond the fact that some human fags adhere to a bizarre social subculture.


You could say the same about any group of people with whom you disagree, so this doesn't hold water.


You want to use this theory with no associated studies or support to condone a "final solution" for fags, which is dumb on principle.

If you hate fags, then it shouldn't matter if you have a theory to back up your distaste for them, because that's chump behavior.

Let's say that the studies that countless geneticists have done are valid, and homosexuality is indeed a genetic mutation.

Would you still hate fags any less?

Probably not.

That's why all this moral posturing under the guise of science on your part gives a bad name to true science and logic.

Think about it: how many straight men have fucked dykes and remain straight to this day?

If fucking is a transmission vector for the gay germ, then every straight man who has fucked a dyke should be gay.

It also follows that the nastiest, most germ-ridden cities should have the highest population of fags, but that's not the case.

Hawaii is considered the cleanest state in the US, but it has way more fags than dirty-as-fuck states like Alabama and Mississippi.

Think about it.

...

Yes, I imagine it is much like when I went through my "cougar phase". When I was in my early 20s, I fucked a woman in her mid-40s who was very attractive for her age. I distinctly remember the first few times we had sex. At first, I was kinda grossed out. She looked great for her age fully clothed, but when she was naked all the flaws of aging were on full display. Wrinkles, scars, stretch marks, loose skin, saggy tits, and all. Still, I was horny enough to keep going and she was wild and freaky as fuck in bed. Plus, she couldn't get pregnant due to a hysterectomy so it was all raw with no worries of pregnancy.

So, all in all, I enjoyed myself. I kept going and started hitting up online dating sites, and discovered (to no one's surprise) that divorcees in their 40s with a couple of kids give up the pussy really, really easy. So I started fucking a lot of cougars. I noticed after a while, all those flaws that grossed me out about the first cougar I fucked, ACTUALLY STARTED TO BECOME ATTRACTIVE TO ME. After fucking a dozen or so different women between 40-50, I literally became more attracted to older women than women my own age.

Anyway, for reasons I won't go into now, I eventually stopped pursuing older women and all women for a time. Went through a year long dry spell. When I got back into the game, the first girl I fucked was a 21 year old with a tight body, perky tits, and flawless skin. Instantly, my attraction to older women fell away, and I realized I had literally conditioned myself to want to fuck older women simply because it was easy sex.

It was then and there that I realized it was easily possible that a lot of faggots became faggots through a similar process.

Homosexuality is not genetic, but conditioned. Sexuality is not "fluid" as many tumblrite degenerates would have you believe, but it is plastic to a certain degree, especially in its early developmental stages. Gays and lesbians are 10 times more likely to report being sexually touched as a child than straight people, and commit about a third of the sex crimes against children despite being only 1-2 percent of the population, (15-33 times more likely to molest children). Given those two data points it is apparent that homosexuality is a mental illness caused by child molestation, and since they cannot reproduce naturally, they reproduce like a virus by preying on children.

Monogamy is quite rare in sub-Saharan Africa, this is because women do most of the farming and are expected to support themselves. Polygamy was simple impossible in Northern Eurasia, where men were the only source of calories, a single man simply couldn't provide for more than one woman. This may also have driven Eurasian women to evolve greater physical attractiveness.

tl;dr: Polygamy doesn't really work in a society where a man is expected to actually support a woman while she raises the family.

You didn't post a single study which supported the genetic theory of homosexuality.


There is more evidence for the gay-germ theory than for any other theory of homosexuality. If you were a neutral observer you wouldn't care either way, but you are clearly a faggot who senses the danger of the gay-germ theory.


Here on the nationalist right, we have the pleasant benefit of science always conforming to our political beliefs, the gay-germ is just one further example of this.


I've never been inside a church in my life. You should take my word for it, all healthy men have a natural instinct to exterminate faggots on sight. You should consider killing yourself and saving us the trouble.


Once again, you say this without a single bit of supporting evidence. Even mainstream geneticists don't consider homosexuality to be genetic.


I don't think that dykes have anything to do with the gay-germ. They just seem like women with a hormone imbalance, they don't eat-da-poopoo and they are far rarer than male homosexuals.


Yes it is.


Hawaii has twice the population density of Alabama and four times the population density of Mississippi. There is nothing objectively dirty about the low-population density rural states of Alabama and Mississippi, you are just regurgitating kike media indoctrination.


Harmful recessive genes are only passed on if they provide a massive benefit in the heterozygous form. There is no evidence for this being the case with homosexuality, besides, these genes would have been easily found, no known genetic correlations with homosexuality exist.

Kill all the fags BPSA style

Reported.

I posted three.


Where is it, then?


Just because you believe in something doesn't make it true; you have to back up your claims with rigor, which is something that you have not done.


Why?


The studies I posted say different.


WHOA WHOA WHOA

HOLD THE PHONE

THIS IS WHERE YOUR THEORY FALLS APART

GERMS AFFECT BOTH SEXES AND THERE ARE BOTH MALE AND FEMALE FAGGOTS, SO IT NECESSARILY FOLLOWS THAT A GAY GERM AFFECTS BOTH SEXES

ERGO, ANY STRAIGHT MAN WHO FUCKS A DYKE SHOULD TURN GAY DUE TO THE TRANSMISSION VECTOR OF THE GAY GERM

NO STRAIGHT MAN HAS EVER TURNED GAY AFTER FUCKING A DYKE, THOUGH, WHICH SHREDS YOUR THEORY TO PIECES

THIS STRAIGHT MAN DYKE FUCKER SHOULD ALSO BECOME A GAY GERM CARRIER AND INFECT HIS OTHER PARTNERS, WHICH ALSO DOES NOT HAPPEN


There's another hole in your theory.

Areas with the least sanitation should be most prevalent to the gay germ, which means that those areas should have the most gay people.

It doesn't follow, though, which is another nail in the coffin of your theory.

...

What the fuck are you talking about? You posted and I called you out on your shit taste. Then some assmad weeb called me a redditor and I laughed at him.

When the hell did I say anything about reaction pics you retarded autist?

No, nothing you posted supports the genetic hypothesis for homosexuality.


There is no evidence to support a pathogenic cause for lesbianism, it is likely a hormonal issue. Homosexual men outnumber lesbian women 10 to 1. Besides, if lesbianism were pathogenic, there would be no reason to believe that it was caused the the same pathogen as male homosexuality. Lesbians and faggots have no behavioral characteristics in common.

I cannot rule out the possibility that a homosexual man can pass on his gay-germ to a female carrier and thereby infect her future children, but since sibling homosexual concordance is so low, this is unlikely to be the case.

cool pic, have more?

It's paradoxical because anyone who wants to be a special snowflake is a faggot.

I believe in proactive eugenics. Bullets are cheap, so are lives.

Now that is the other problem here.

You'll find anything if you look for it you stupid fuck. There is way more non-fag shit.

...

It can affect them differently. Many parasites affect males and females of the host species differently.


What if its transmitted through faeces, so they'd need anal intercourse for that?


Do you have data on every intercourse between a heterosexual man and a dyke? Because that is pretty interesting.


Who is he? Do you know him? Are you sure that he isn't infecting others? Besides, aren't dykes homosexual? Then why would they fuck a straight man? And why are you writing in all caps?


We don't know the exact transmission method. If it's faeces, then you can't just get it by walking in the street. At least in the first world. But you can get it a lot easier if you have anal sex with people who have this disease. If homosexuals flock to Hawaii, then you can find more of them there. The infection rate doesn't have to correlate with the "cleanness" of a state. How do you even measure that?

I still say homosexuality is a fetish that many people who enjoy it have a biological predisposition like a foot fetish but ultimately the person choises to be a faggot. This also means that people without the predisposition can fall for the poz but at the same time those who have those urges can nlchoose to not act on them. From what I've observed with the current trends with millennials it seems to make the most sense.

Fucking end yourself my man

This thread doesn't deserve anymore posts

I think it's a good thread. Lot's of red-pilling material on faggots.

...

Let's be honest: if killing off a very specific part of a country's population is incredibly beneficial to the whole of the country, then playing with the idea isn't that much of a problem.

One has to give the post-(((Trotsky))) Russian communists credit where credit is due. They sent faggots to the Siberian death-camps.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_and_homosexuality#Soviet_Union


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_history_in_Russia#LGBT_history_under_Stalin:_1933.E2.80.931953

This is correct. Any healthy man has an absolute revulsion to male homosexuality, that is impossible to fully describe to women, or faggots themselves. You want to either destroy it, or get away from it as fast as possible.

Try going to a local mall in a big city… its a faggot's dream.

The studies I posted do exactly that.

You haven't posted any studies, though, so that makes your theory seem far less credible.


Faggotry is faggotry.

If you're going to make the case for a germ bequeathing homosexuals without any evidence to support your claims, then you must necessarily accept that both males and females are susceptible to this germ.


That's the type of information that would be in the studies that you need to post to confirm your theory, but those studies don't exist because your theory fails at basic rigor.


The millions of men who have fucked millions of women in the ass and remain straight to this day are proof that your theory is facile.


Why not?

Germs have multiple transmission vectors, so it necessarily follows that a gay germ could infect people in multiple ways.

There is no such thing as "contact gayness," though, which also makes your theory look foolish.


Of course it does.

Germs can be defeated through sanitation, which means that if your theory is true, then killing the gay germ is as simple as practicing good hygiene.

With this in mind, lack of hygiene and sanitation would create the conditions necessary for the gay germ to foster and infect others.

There is no correlation between cleanliness and heterosexuality, though, which is another drawback to your theory that has no scientific basis.

You are one dumb fucker. Male homosexual behavior is completely different from female homosexual behavior. Equating the two shows you have no grasp of the subject at hand from a scientific viewpoint.

How do you figure?

absolutely true, yes.

male homosexuals have anonymous sex with hundreds of partners. Outliers literally have sex with thousands.

Lesbians tend to treat the sex as a side element for drama and attention (when they're young) or companionship (when they're older, or otherwise in the catlady stage)

this isn't even in debate, there's really very little that fags and dykes have in common in terms of behavior.

if you think either male or female homosexuals have monogamous relationships like straight people do, congratulations, you've swallowed the programming completely.

gay males who are "monogamous" very often consider oral sex as "not counting" and continue to Grindr up anonymous opportunities to swap STDs.

...

The first one is about epigenetics not genetics. The second one has major counter indications and the third one doesn't support the genetic hypothesis.

Also, you inspired me to make some OC. Here's the resized version.

More Fragile – Mundy explains that studies have found “higher dissolution rates among same-sex couples” in Scandinavia – one of the world’s most gay-friendly cultures — than married heterosexual couples. This study, published in Demography, found that even though same-sex couples enter their legal unions at older ages — a marker related to greater relational stability – male same-sex marriages break up at twice the rate of heterosexual marriages. And the break-up rate for lesbians? A stunning 77% higher than the same-sex male unions! When controlling for possible confounding factors, the “risk of divorce for female partnerships actually is more than twice than that for male unions.” Mundy did not give her reader these important specifics from this study. Other studies show the same things.

A study of two generations of British couples (one born 1958, the other 1970) in same-sex cohabiting, opposite-sex cohabiting and opposite-sex marriage relationships found the same-sex relationships dramatically more likely to break up than the opposite-sex cohabiting and married relationships. The probabilities of the various relationships surviving to the 4 and 8 year anniversaries are dramatic (p. 981):
Reaching Anniversary Same-SexCohab Opposite-Sex Cohab Opposite-Sex Married
4 years 37% 67% 88%
8 years 25% 60% 82%

The author explains the magnitude of his findings “are consistent with previous research in other countries.” (p. 984) There were no significant differences between the two generational cohorts, indicating that issues of past social stigma and growing social acceptance had no meaningful effect on relational longevity.

Other studies – conducted by celebrated lesbian scholars – find notable instability in lesbian homes, even those with children. The current National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study (NLLFS) found “a significant difference” in family dissolution rates when comparing lesbian with mother/father headed families, 56% and 36% respectively. (p. 1201)

Another research study by two celebrated gay-friendly scholars, highlights a major comparative study between hetero and lesbian homes where, in the 5-year period of the study, 6 of the 14 lesbian mother-headed homes had broken up compared to only 5 of the 38 mom/dad headed homes. (p. 11) These scholars creatively explains that this stability imbalance is likely due to the “high standards lesbians bring to their intimate unions…” (p.12)
canonandculture.com/are-same-sex-couples-just-like-you/

That's genetics; you just don't want to admit it.


Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that it isn't valid.


Yes, it does.

Where are your studies?


Plagiarizing Goebbels is nice, but it's not original.

I'm in the same camp as you, and you're making us look stupid.

hello Rick

You both sidestep the main thing about homosexuality.

Homosexuals are attracted to members of the same sex.

A woman attracted solely to women is no different than a man attracted solely to men.

It is the type of attraction that causes members of our species to be classified as homosexuals, not behavior.

If a germ causes homosexuality in the human species and there are male and female homosexuals, then it necessarily follows that this germ affects both sexes.

The only reason you would disagree with this is if you have a preference for female homosexuals, and it's obvious that both of you do.

If you're justifying faggotry you are absolutely not in the same camp as us, no matter how you try to delude yourself.

See:

yo what slavic language is this, то не явно :(

how is this true? the behavior isn't the same. are you arguing that men and women approach sex in the same way? because you can look out your window and see that's not true.

male-male sex is extremely promiscuous in a way that female-female isn't.

Never mind the fact that lesbians don't engage in penetrative anal sex. See, lesbians don't have penises.

literally a pedophile. I don't trust any of those statistics, he had an extremely strong personal agenda.

lets say you're gay germ theory is correct. what about the faggots who want to get rid of the germ?

would they get different treatment from the rest?

I find it amusing that you think arguing the genetic theory will get you anywhere. Even if we were to accept this ridiculous premise, it would simply mean you are genetically FLAWED and should be disposed of. You do know where you are, right?

Here we go again. How about you alt right faggots piss off back to your fuckparty.

That's irrelevant.

The behavior isn't the cause of the condition, but rather a symptom of it.

The condition to which I am referring is same-sex attraction.

Homosexuals are classified as such for one reason: they are attracted to members of the same sex.

I find it amusing that you're being so dramatic.

You did read my OP, right?

That speaks poorly if your scientific literacy.


This isn't the alt-right, faggot.

That is not the "main thing" about homosexuality. Human male homosexuality is a disease with a large and complex set of behavioral and phenotypical characteristics.

1. An intense attraction to penis and male anus.
2. Feminine physical and facial characteristics.
3. Homosexuals tend to cluster in a few professions, such as theater and hairdressing.
4. A lisp is common trait among homosexuals.
5. Homosexuals are massively over-represented among the perpetrators of child sexual abuse.
6. Homosexuals are far more likely than the rest of the population to report having been sexually abused as children.
7. Homosexuals are massively over-represented among practitioners of human waste fetishism.
8. Homosexuals are over-represented among the mentally ill and narcotics abusers.
9. Homosexuals practice extreme promiscuity, with average lifetime sexual partner counts in the hundreds.
10. Homosexuals are a reservoir for a wide range of sexually transmitted diseases.
11. Homosexuality is not caused by an excess of estrogen or a deficiency in testosterone. Giving testosterone to homosexuals only makes them more aggressively homosexual.


In contrast to homosexual men, homosexual women seem to suffer from nothing more than a hormone imbalance.


All faggots will need to be quarantined to prevent the spread of the disease. It is possible that no cure can be devised, in which case faggots will be subjected to lifelong quarantine, or extermination, depending on various economic and political circumstances.

Post some studies instead of getting your panties in a twist.

I'm waiting.


Yes, it is.

Do you even know the etymology of the term?

We are gonna need a bigger bog

What are you talking about?

Nice posts, but at this point there's no reason to continue. The guy is either a troll, a shill, or a hardheaded faggot.

The real question is how do we get a list of baby steps required to make things less gay.

Even small starter steps could help those around us see the AIDS culture for what it is and reject it.

jews control tv
jews control hollywood
jews been pushing progressive crap they don't even teach in their own schools, or israel
socialist,communist,marxist groups, funded and puppeted by jews
jews
goys
jew hq
business

Homosexuality and birth defects will be eliminated with the advent of designer babies, but there will still be a push for tolerance and diversity in our culture.

This sort of social predisposition toward the flamboyant and effeminate requires more attention than eliminating homosexuality altogether.

No studies proving the gay-germ theory exist. It is simply a theory, but it is the best theory that we have, it is also a theory that is extremely expedient for us. There is no rational reason to support any other theory of homosexuality.

You seem determined to argue against the gay-germ theory, I am not interested in having this argument with you. I come here to coordinate with other white men on how best to eliminate our enemies, both within and without the European ethnonationalist movement. Homosexuals are a major enemy of a healthy European civilization, and the gay-germ theory is the most effective rhetorical weapon that we have against the homosexual threat. That alone makes the gay-germ theory invaluable to us. Your resistance to the gay-germ theory, in spite of overwhelming evidence, only underlines what a serious threat faggot infiltrators are. You are just another parasite addled zombie trying to make every available social and political community into a safe place to spread your pathogen.

What makes you say this when there are other theories around with far more studies and research associated with them?


Why would you support a theory with absolutely no scientific basis or endorsements over other theories with studies and research?


Europe is the result of what the Greeks did, though, and the Greeks were flamboyantly gay while they ushered in a new era of civilization.


You haven't provided any evidence despite the fact that I have asked you repeatedly to do so.

As a country dies it's people turn to homosexuality in apprehension of the incoming doom. It's a sort of psychic sexual death wish.

Welp, can't unwatch that now, can I?

actually, as a country dies, I think people turn to intellectual masturbation

pretty obvious since most of pol is more interested in reading instead of actually doing something IRL

I think the real reason people don't like gays is because they get to drop all those gender norms the sjws talk about.

the irony

This hits close to home for many of us.

Everything that a young man in this world does is wrong, so he stops trying.

He can't get a job, so he stops applying.

Women fee the need to be impossibly choosy, so he stops dating.

Family members give advice that no longer applies in this era, so he stops listening.

School is too expensive and doesn't improve his lot in life, so he stops pursuing education.

The political candidates no longer represent him, so he stops voting.

The only things he can do are stay fit for his own sake and chat online with other young men experiencing the same struggles.

This is what a dead end looks like.

You gotta collect the rest yourself.

:^)

CommonFilth pls

I guess it would have been better for your argument to have mentioned some of these other theories.


Because it is the theory supported by the same trustworthy people who advocate for heredity of IQ, European racial superiority, eugenics and other politically restricted topics. It is also the theory that objectively makes the most sense, and strikes the most terror into the hearts of faggots.


Classical Greek civilization only lasted a few hundred years before succumbing to various social pathologies, among which was the gay-germ.


I have provided sufficient evidence for any non-interested party to accept. As a homosexual, you are an interested party immune to all argument.

1) Kill all Jews

2) Kill homosex pushers

3) ????

Profit.

Dude tell that faggot to go back to the alt-right, we don't accept that gay shit here.

Mainly the nobles were and upperclass were faggots. I doubt the common man was a butt driller.


The idea of a gay civilization is ridiculous in of itself, babies don't make themselves.

these graphs with links explain it all, user. let me know if you have any questions

That's very considerate of you, but since your theory has no scientific basis or empirical evidence supporting it, then bringing it up is silly.


I can entertain the theory that race and IQ are related much more readily than I can entertain the theory that a parasite causes homosexuality.

The former has empirical evidence to support it, whereas the latter has nothing of the sort, which makes it no different than a fairy tale told to children to help them sleep at night.


It was still gay, though.


What can be presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.


Why do you think I'm gay?

And yet the gay germ is the most supported theory of homosexuality in existence. No other theory even approaches it in terms of real world behavioral correlations and biological feasibility.


Yes, it does appear that individuals infected with the gay-germ were present in ancient Greece.


You came here as a faggot infiltrator but blew your cover repeatedly, such as here for example


It is common for faggots like you to misunderstand our revulsion towards homosexuality. Our problem is not with faggot culture, it is with the very existence of faggots.

Suck my dick.

How can you say this when no medical professional or scientist is willing to support it and no studies on it exist?


Regardless of whether you believe that parasites cause homosexuality, the fact remains that Western civilization is the invention of people who were inclined toward homosexual behavior.


How do you figure that I'm gay?

Furthermore, how can anyone infiltrate a board that has no access control?


Why do you think that I'm gay, and why do you think I wouldn't understand your disdain for fags?

Compare those girls to lefty protestors..

I'm gonna put something else in your vagina :^)

no faggot, SEX is a biological function- to reproduce

not to go ass spelunking with your fairy fucking friends kill yourself now instead of waiting another few years

Men going their own way resulted in too many sausage fests to not be confused with gaydom.

There are plenty of scientists who support the gay-germ theory, though few will do so publicly.


This is highly debatable. Western civilization is a meaningless concept. The best that could be said about the ancient Greeks, is that they were the first European population to achieve a high population density, allowing them to grasp many low-hanging scientific fruit.


Like I said, you ascribed my homophobia to religion, rather than innate genetic revulsion. Any man who lacks an innate genetic revulsion to homosexuals is likely a homosexual. This is also how we know that Richard Spencer is a homosexual.

...

Name some, then.


I mentioned this before, but what can be presented without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.


Then why are you a nationalist?


Why do you think that makes me gay?


Do you have any facts to back that up?

...

greatest pic ever top KEK

Let me reiterate the evidence:

I. Homosexual behavior seems optimized for pathogen distribution. The huge sexual partner counts, extreme promiscuity, and waste product fetishism are obviously ideal behaviors for rapid pathogen transmission. In fact, Toxoplasma itself is a common co-morbid parasite of homosexuals.

II. The cycle of homosexual child sexual abuse is extremely apparent, a tiny proportion of the population is responsible for about 40% of child sexual abuse. This combined with the high rate of reported childhood abuse among those men who subsequently grow up to become homosexuals is strong evidence in favor of the gay germ theory.

III. Homosexuality has a high rate of co-morbidity with many other mental illnesses, this can be explained as a side-effect of the brain parasite.

IV. If homosexuality had a non-pathogenic cause, there would be no need for widespread homophobia to evolve. If some men voluntarily leave the reproductive market, this should allow the remaining men easier access to the females of the community. Objectively, a non-pathogenic homosexuality can be viewed as advantageous for the reproductive males. This does not happen in reality, almost every society treats homosexuals with violent revulsion. Homophobia is almost certainly an evolved response to a contagious pathogen threat.

V. Homosexuality has a very low twin concordance rate, ruling out any genetic explanations.


I seek to preserve the European race. I don't recognize any entity called "Western civilization".


Because lacking this evolutionarily necessary revulsion to disease implies infection with disease. This is an excellent way to spot faggot infiltrators.

So you're willing to kill off a white man who wishes to have a wife and 4+ kids? Because he has unusual lust that he's keeping undercontrol as well as denounces it?

Yeah, this is our true theory of complex behavior of humans. We don't need any proofs, only our refined armchair skills. And we would eliminate any dissent, because we're right. We are the true critical thinkers.

Good god, this place is filled with incredibly stupid faggots.

Where would've LHO's shots landed for that to be true, again?

The research about homosexuality is mainly conducted by homosexuals, or people who are at least sympathetic to homosexuality. It's rather hard to get accepted by them if your research hurts their feelings. Most scientists don't want to deal with that, so they keep themselves away from these kinds of researches. It's not hard to understand this, expect if you don't want to. And if you don't want to, then you need a one way ticket to a bog.

Would you keep alive a HWITE man with Down syndrome if he wishes to have a wife and a dozen children?

Homosexuality is psychological. The great majority of homosexuals are attention whore narcisistic people with some grievance that want to spite The Man — these are the degenerates. In a other few cases, it's outcasts who have felt detached from receiving too much hurt either from people at large or from parents and start idolizing the same-sex someone who is nice to them — some of these "evolve" to the first case while some understand that they shouldn't make their fantasy into a social and political point.

This theory that diddled kids grow up to be homosexuals has no validity, most child sex abuse victims constitute family and form healthy relationships with the opposing sex. The theory that homosexuals are the worst sex offenders against children though, that's valid. In proportion homosexuals tend to practice substantially more abuse than heterosexuals.

Hell is forever!

Irregardless of its origins and spread, one thing is clearly known and it worked throughout the centuries - gays were shunned and hunted down and that kept the numbers low.

Now, we have both the research on pathogenic connection but also the quite known and fairly ancient recognition of child abuse leading to degenerate behaviour later in life. In both cases, treatment is the same - isolation, quarantine and ostracism.

The issue here is that this would undermine the current political and ideological order, were it revealed and were the gays exposed as walking septic tanks of degeneracy.

There is but one idea left, one banner for sane men to rally under. You all know what it is.

Bane?

Not only that the UK has a disturbingly high amount of furries, 2nd only to Germany.

he is 100% correct tho. Anime is for homosexuals and fucking retards now a days.

I'm glad somebody said it. Anime was never cool it will never ever be cool. Its basically the equivalent of jumping up and down and yelling "look at me I will never see a vagina in real life!"

That's not a refutation, but rather an appeal to authority exhibiting self-selection/attrition bias in the extreme.

Why? Where did it hit, exactly?

...

Not me. I'm not from this retarded planet. I don't know how such a retarded place exists, but here I am. Trapped here with you faggots.

The bottom looks worried though, so I doubt it's celebration. More like humiliation before they're executed.

The person peeking in throught the window though…

And I sure hope that's the wear and tear of an ancient artifact and not semen stains.

Kebabs are fucking weird. They fuck each other in the ass in secret, but openly kill each other for it. It's that semitic DNA. Fucking neurotics…

Fucking cunt.

...

get the fuck out of here. you aren't welcome here.

you don't deserve those double dubs

The disease that causes homosexuality in Men, can also cause promiscuity in Women, who are more likely to give birth to slutty or queer kids. That description fits many Jews, who were, or had an ancestor who was infected via circumcision. Nothing about these people is remotely natural.

JFK was a hoax. The guy standing in for JFK was obviously wearing a wig, to conceal a 'squib' pyrotechnic'. It falls apart after going off, and Jackie tries to conceal it from the camera. The 'bullet' also strikes at frame 322 of the Zapruder Footage, a Skull & Bones reference.

Also, Lincoln was assassinated in a theater. *cough*. This wife of his looks a lot like a Man in a dress. It has probably always been like this. Gay actors making shit up. King George III and George Washington were probably one and the same.

...

I mean if antisocial personality is genetically-linked then homosexuality is, seeing that homosexuality is one of many pathological behaviors.

The poop-vector idea makes me think of the rise in buttsecks and asslicking going on in straight porn

I never understood it. Girls assholes don't interest me. Maybe it's a way for the poop-vector to spread? Maybe it's just general degeneracy from those with no disgust reaction?


I know there was an old study on this, which is always dismissed as 'fucking little boys is pedophilia, not homosexuality'

I want more ammo against the fags, anyone know where to find details on this shit? I keep trying to find studies and everything is behind paywalls or in journals I can't find.


And thanks for the descriptions of homophobia/hatredordisgust at fags. I always wondered why they make me want to barf and get the fuck away from them.

Are they always homos? Is Trump a faggot, too?

Cheers user, can I hear more?

I also find this phenomenon disturbing. It is entirely possible that the rise in anal fetishism is due to some sort of parasite. Waste fetishism and Furryism almost certainly are.


This link has some good data.

familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/


While doing some research, I found out about the Gay Panic Defense. Revulsion to faggots is so great among healthy males that it can be invoked as a legal defense for murder across much of the Anglo-sphere.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense

Kikeopedia tries hard to link gay panic to closet homosexuality, as faggots are wont to do, but I think that it is good evidence for the existence of an innate involuntary violent response to the gay-germ pathogen threat.

The only thing you can do in this life is be a good man, a paragon of masculinity, and set a good example for others. If it gets you exiled, so be it. You'll be in the company of many great men from history.

The termites are eating the foundations of our society, and it will soon collapse. Be ready to step up take charge when it's time to rebuild. In the meantime, focus on self-improvement and self-sufficiency.

...

FAGGOT KIKE MEDIA

stop bumping the threads you faggot

>>>/oven/
>>>/auschwitz/

Every fucking time, Mordecai

When I was a kid (in the 80's) rainbows were just something cool to look at. It wasnt associated with gay anal sex at all. Now the rainbow is directly linked to disgusting sodomy.

The kikes not only pervert the uses and meanings of words, but they do the same with everything, including images.

They want to brown everything up, literally.

Those are all jew owned, created, and/or run.
I wouldn't be surprised if you live in a blue city and that your co-workers are commies or kikes too.

bump

...

Move to the country, retard.

Who do you think gives bailouts?

There's other stuff that involves transmission optimization of pathogens like methamphetamine Orgies, Circumscision, and mutilition/pedo/ritualized sex. The meth has allowed mass spread of HIV and toxoplasmosis by lengthening the fuck-session and the intensifying the desire for fuck by it's participants, as well as preventing them from ejaculating, so they fuck a guy bloody.
Circumcision ties into this as well, the absolute worst examples of faggotry were all cut, and as a result don't receive enough stimulation to maintain a stiffy with a condom on, even flying on meth or coke, so they have to fuck bareback, and even one that's half hard, that and they need lots of crisco to keep going in, and since these guys will be fucked for daysand then get fisted, and get infected loads shot up past the third ring where the fragile intestinal lining is…

Pedo is how these sick freaks start, they get initiated by older sick freaks at a tender age, hooked on meth, and controlled with meth.
by the age of 12, they've done everything you can think of.

Google "tribe.net meth boys" (Damn, they got memory holed, well, most of them."

Mutiliation is another messy enviroment spread of pathogens. Throw in ritualized sex and you find a pack of self destroying freaks, some that keep body parts as trophies.
archive.is/zRekI

Homos are like women in that they hit the ugly wall in their thirties. They're obsessed with youth, possibly due to the poop vector looking to maximise potiential transmissions by infecting the younger flesh.

Most fags were initiated by older faggots trying to fuck nubile questioning cases, and most faggots I know would do the same if the roles wre reversed, and even go younger than puberty if only it were legal. Nuke Vancouver. Please.

BECAUSE TOO MANY WHITE PEOPLE ARE IN REPRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS!

OY VEY

I think this guy's theory stands to be more correct:

You're forgetting that homosexuality was something normal among spartan troops. Young boys would be easy for access than your woman while you're away on a campaign, I think this is a very well documented bit.

Gay sexual conditioning is probably the thing. It's hard to believe that 50% of USA's youths is "gay" because of some mystical gay germ because that would mean 3% or so of the USA's population rubbed their dicks all over 50% of the children.

Instead of bog, try camp, as in death camp.

Everything you've pointed to is jew captured and pushed agenda, which is the answer: jews.

Yes, I addressed this here:

I believe that the gay-germ led to the downfall of Sparta.


Young boys are always easier to access than women, but a healthy man is profoundly repulsed by the thought of sexually molesting a boy.


Yes, it is hard to believe, because it isn't true.

Look, I know the lad was overreacting, so here's a greek qt 3.14 to make up for it.

Read:

...