J.K. Rowling Just Explained Why Trump or Jared Kushner Wouldn't Have Been Slytherins

time.com/4713730/jk-rowling-trump-kushner-slytherin/?xid=time_socialflow_twitter

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/4wvU5
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

stopped reading there
why is this bitch even famous in the first place?

Rowling is the reason millennials are what they are.

Holy shit btfo! I got all of my political beliefs from Harry Potter.

...

Hurr, durr, Trump is not a wizard, so he wouldn't be at Hogwarts. No shit, really? That's the sort of thing a legitimately autistic person would say.

BTW, even when I was younger I noticed how stereotypical the four houses were: Slytherin is for bad guys, Griffindor for main characters, Hufflepuff for losers and Ravenclaw is for the rest I guess.


Because WB made a series of movies based on her books. Before the movies were announced Harry Potter was just another children's book, but once the movie was announced HP was fucking everywhere because WB pumped fucktons of viral marketing money everywhere they could.

This deluded bitch.l

I thought the whole point of the series was that wizard supremacism is bad, but here she is shaming people for being Muggles

what gives?

On twitter I see she is pro Muslims and hijabs wtf lol. She is SJW virtue signalling textbook succubus.

...

That's what Voldermort would say, Ms. Rowling.

why do lefty journos constantly compare reality to fiction? do they have no other way of expressing their opinion other than pointing and saying "like that"? or is it contempt for the average reader, assuming they can only relate to movies and tv?

really makes you think.

Modern liberal ideology lacks any real substance. It is completely based on propaganda and psyops, and as such, their view of reality is tightly linked to said propaganda.

But Harry Potter is absolutely horrible as lefty propaganda.

What?

Wizards = Europeans
Slytherin = Nationalists
Muggles = Non-whites

Except Trump is a muggle, apparently.

Well, remember, there's nothing worse than social chastisement to a liberal.

It's what happens when media companies hire 'culture critics'.

They hardly make a case for muggles at all, the only reason Harry even gives a shit about Voldemort is because he goes after HIM, if he were just killing off muggles, nobody would care.

I just want to be left alone.

They actually do make a case for muggles. Remember all of that mudblood bullshit? How miscegenation is good, and how wizards can be born to muggles (in other words, how a non-white can aspire to be white; no wonder she made Hermione into a nigger).

Voldemort is such a danger because he wants to throw away the democratic, liberal system that the wizards have, and replace it with a structured, hierarchical, merit based, and racially pure system. I mean, it doesn't get less subtle than that.

Still a terrible message.

Not terrible for their purposes though.

Good! Muggles are objectively better than wizards anyway.


Bring the Inquisition back and burn Hermione on the stake, maybe that will make her pitch black as JK Rowling really wants.

"Unless they happen to be born with that special quality, they are irredeemable stupid people who are dangerous and not fit to live close to" is not a liberal message, unless you think Hitler is a liberal. He did think there were a few special niggers and jews after all.

That's literally the message of liberalism. Liberals are all born with that special quality that makes them more tolerant, and anyone who isn't born with that special quality are irredeemable stupid people who are dangerous and not fit to live close to.

I lost all credibility for her when she went after pewds. Sell that bitch to slavery.

Muggles would care, and they had enough firepower to turn Voldemort into a Swiss cheese. Remember what happened the last time witches got all uppity during the Middle Ages?

holy sh*t! droomfp B T F O!

This is worse than assassin's blyat

we /menofthewest/ now?

I have always been a /manofthewest/ user, dunno about the rest of you.

Does that mean Voldemort is a liberal?

Ravenclaw was pretty much the normalfag house.

This woman will be remembered for being an attention whore instead of her books, it's sad how patethic can succesful(rich) people get

Apparently

Because her books sold more than any other book in history and the films were the highest grossing film series until marvel shit out 15 films you utter sack of fucking shit

She had such a short-lived career so she has to pander to stay relevant.


Are you posting a 3x3 to make it seem more kino than it is? Yes chris columbus is a good director, but quit pretending there's any depth to it.

Wrong, the best selling one was the Philosopher's Stone, and Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes, A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens, The Alchemist by Paul Coelho and The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry all sold more than that
Wrong, even if we exclude capeshit or movies made after 2010 titanic grossed out more then The Deathly Hollows pt. 2, which is the highest grossing Hairy Pozzer movie
Get fugged, Joanne

wtf, i don't remember hermione getting tentacle raped in the movie

can you guys at least admit that the movies were good? I still didn't read the Harry Potter books but the movies are still in my memories, the music too. People change apparently, let's just enjoy things from a time when they weren't gigantic assholes.

I enjoyed the books.

this is nice to hear honestly, hope for humantiy and all that, everyone should read Quixote it still fuckin holds up and is genuinely funny


you and your kind are my windmill

Devils snare scene


Most of the movies are good. 6 is downrght the worst, with hallows p2 right behind it. Despite being terrible adaptations i really enjoyed 4 and 5. 2 is weird, i don't really like it but i don't dislike it. 1 and 3 are by far the best, 7 is 3rd best.

As far as the books go, for me 6 is the best, 7 is a damn fine conclusion, 4 is second best and the rest don't matter.

I absolutely loved the first 3 HP PC games, nobody will take that away from me. Rowling is a fucking piece of shit, but in the games and movies her part was writing the story, not designing everything, composing, acting, etc. It was not a one man army.

my nigga, they were the shit

The books are actually better than the movies in many respects except one thing. The movies managed to tell all the important story details without the autistic pacing from the books or excessive cutting, but that is more because the creative team were good, not because the source material was objectively the best thing ever.


When you think about it modern libtards like JKR here are pretty much Quixotic personalities.

Also, call me reddit but i think a sort of "machete order" like they tried with star wars would work better with hp if you focus on voldemort. Like, start with 4, then use 6 for the flashback scenes, then 1, 2, 5, 7, 8. 3 would have to be skipped since voldemort isn't in it.

listening to the song at 07:23 in the video above brings a tear to my eye Jeremy Soule is awesome

Fuck yeah, you guys are alright. I played the absolute shit out of the gbc ports of 1 and 2.

autistic subhuman commies obsessed with things that aren't real

Neo-Holla Forums is that way, friend.

Literally Alexander Gordon Jahans.

...

That's kind of like arguing that niggers are okay but only because they might pop out a kid who acts white every once in a while. Leftists would crucify someone who said something like that.

What the fuck is this shit? Did J.K. Rowling not read her own books? Was J.K. Rowling killed and replaced with a double? Did someone else write the books for her? What the fuck?

The implication is that non-whites can breed children who can be integrated in white civilized society. This is one of the central tenets of leftism.

The whole message regarding Muggles was always schizophrenic as hell. Muggles are represented by Harry's shitty family. From the get go you're being trained to see them as bad people.

...

I thought that was being an uncle Tom, or internalising racism or something. Diversity is our strength.

That's exactly what it is. A house nigger. A black cuck.

DRUMPGLE

i hate niggers

...

Fucking dog shit.

checkmate libtards

Oh shit yes, I need to post this on normiebook and watch the liberal river of rage tears flow.

...

post reactions

i'd ride her

So that's why they're the bad guys, hehehehe good goyim.

Did she ever?

He wasn't wrong even without it, but the dumb bitch couldn't leave well enough alone. Voldemort, before he was properly introduced and promptly hit with the strawman idiot-ball because of the authors own prejudice, was the best character in the books.

archive.is/4wvU5

Kill yourself, hotpocket

The first two movies are the only good ones. I hated the third one at first but its not so bad after rewatching it. After that it devolves into the really teen drama angst shit and stops really being about the magic.

More like
Wizards = Old Money
Mudbloods = New Money
Muggles = Peasants
The books do a spectacular job of not giving a shit about muggles, do Hermione's parents even have names?

Rowling has always been explicit that the wizarding world is meant to be a kind of refuge for special snowflakes from the horrible people who don't get how special they are. This got muddled with Voldemort turning into Hitler but the book's message is more along the lines that special snowflakes shouldn't bully one another.

I missed that when pewdsgate went live.
She got btfo too in the comments, heh.

Interesting. But Harry is a pure-blood. You are meant to identify with him as a "privileged" hu'white. You are a born hero, a pure European, but you must side with mudbloods, degenerates and socialists, and not be like Voldemort, a.k.a literally Hitler, who is very similar to you, but is le ebil.

Harry's only a halfblood, it's the muggle grandparents that count, not his mudblood mother. But leaving aside that autism Harry is meant to be identified with as a socially awkward freak who effortlessly shows up those who shun him, much like Hermione later on in the book. If Harry was a pure hwhite hero it'd be a better book, for one thing he wouldn't be such a womanly loser.

Wew lad. So Harry is technically a pureblood because both his parents are wizards, but in reality he is a mudblood, because his grandparents on his mother's side are muggles.

Also, Voldemort is mudblood (the halfblood prince).

I have a hunch that the breed of propaganda that the Harry Potter books are part of (even if they are so unintentionally) is non-linear. If you look at the liberal mind, it is filled with irreconcilable paradoxes, just like the mind of a woman, or the Talmud and the subconscious.

even the daily stomer was on to her

(Heil'd)
Trump generation will defeat evil cancer (like Green day)

mr and mrs granger

tbh i genuinely do not know.

Noice

u wot m8

mudblood means you're magical and born from two muggle parents, not one. voldemort is half-blood. he's also either harry's distant uncle or cousin, since both are descendants of the peverall brothers and salazar slytherin.

Oh, my bad. Thought it meant wizards who had at least on muggle parent.

nah, voldemort's mum was a squib though, she had to seduce tom riddle with a love potion.

You know your fucking Harry Potter. According to the wiki though, she was only a squib because she was abused by her brother and father. This wasn't in the books though, right?

it was touched on, but didn't go into great detail beyond basically that.

this is also what the movie fucked up, not enough pensieve scenes to establish voldemort's background and instead they filled it with dumb shit like the burrow getting destroyed, something that didn't happen in the book.

How did it become a part of the universe then? It does seem like something JK would write.

Holy shit you fucking niggers are so wrong. Harry and Voldemort are both Halfbloods. A half blood is a magical person with one Pureblood parent, and one muggle-born (or just a regular muggle) parent. Harry's mother is a muggle-born, thus he is a halfblood. Voldemort's father is a muggle.

Mudblood is a derogatory term for muggle-borns. Also, Voldemort's mother wasn't a squib, I think. I'm pretty sure she was just super uneducated in magical shit, due to being locked away her whole life, Fritzl-style. Otherwise she was a normal witch.

thanks pal, that's exactly what i wrote. try checking the posts you quote before you hit the new reply button.


dude, i haven't read half-blood kike since like the last book came out but i remember the details pretty well. her magical abilities were heavily suppressed due to the mental and physical abuse she took, so she basically was a squib.

Try checking my dick your ass, fag. You weren't wrong about the blood purity, but you were, and continue to be, wrong about squibs.

Squibs are not just regular wizards with terrible control over their magic. They are muggles in all but name, utterly incapable of even casting the most basics of magic, or brewing potions, etc etc. Merope was not a squib. She was just a really shitty witch due to no education. Her dad just called her a squib because he was a caricature of a hateful hick.

I was a few years too old to grow up with the Harry Potter franchise. My last girlfriend was a few years younger than me, and insisted I watch the movies with her. I honestly didn't see the appeal. I didn't find them clever or endearing, and I sure as hell didn't want that Emma Watson cunny or whatever the fuck. I grew up reading Lord of the Rings and Redwall, and I even tried reading Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone when it originally came out, but it didn't click with me.

Also, check my repeating digits.

I'm a grown man, why should i give a shit?

Because you're a virgin.

...

It's not like Rowling invented Wizards and Magic.

Should just put a lot of different things kids like together

No the best selling books are all religious texts.

im literally crying right now because we're all muggles and she's mogging muggles like us. she's a mugicist and she needs to take her mugicism and spellprifilege and fuck right the PISS off. i cant even right now tbh everyone im so sorryyyyyy