Dear Moderation of Holla Forums's Holla Forums ("Random") board…
I want to become the owner of this board. More than you LIKE being the owner of this board- trust me. I'm not saying you're bad at moderation, just that I deserve it more.
I will make this thread every day until I'm the owner of this board. I will make Holla Forums great again and it will be better than whatever's going on right now. Thank you.
Other urls found in this thread:
sage
bump
Could you not
bumpo
AGAIN
...
JMO there has been a mild upturn since the site came back on.
Still doesn't mean that this board is great.
since I came over as a refugee, this board has gotten infinitely better
see
yeah, not quality
That sounds exactly like 4chan's Holla Forums.
Don't believe me? Go check it out, it's literally the only things on 4chan's Holla Forums now.
Fullchan on its worst day is still better than halfchan just for the repetition.
Besides if you're the same guy that's been using that flag you don't understand how waves travel through liquid at different pressures so your opinion is still invalid.
That's hilarious coming from an avatarfag. End your life please.
You forgot the shills
You're missing the entire context of my comment but whatever, just jump in without lurking.
Whatever avatarfucker keep making excuses for your attention whoring.
Yes, as a matter of fact I AM that same guy, and as I said before, yes sound DOES travel better through water than sound, but you want to hear why it doesn't mean shit?
Because unless you had some device on your ears that covered your ear holes while simultaneously going in them, and being made of a material that doesn't insulate sound well, such as rubber, then you could hear better (possibly, depending on the structure of your ear canal), and when you're miles deep (like the microphones that recorded the sound), it really doesn't matter if your ears are insulated from the water because your ears would be so heavily pressurized that you LITERALLY would not be able to decipher the difference between a gunshot and a duck quacking. Microphones don't have ear canals that protect them from insane pressure differences like ears do, despite being more durable, they would have an even LESS chance of recording noises that you could decipher. Don't believe me? Sharks actually LIVE in the fucking water, and they can't tell the difference between a death metal riff and a school of struggling fish (both make sounds that don't sound nearly the same), look it up, they even have videos on this. This is literally 7th grade science. You can hear others in a scuba suit while they wear scuba suits because often times they either have a device like I explained earlier or they have insanely expensive radios that are waterproof. Otherwise scuba divers often communicate with hand signals.
nicee
But you don't remember how the whole argument started. You were the one saying that the blip could not be a glacier or a geological phenomenon because it didn't sound like one and because sound couldn't travel that far. Then when I argued with you that the sound would travel fine depending on the depths it occurred at you went back to "you can't tell what it is because of the sound".
On one hand you're arguing that sounds change so much as to be unidentifiable but the crux of your original argument was that you could dismiss the explanations that scientists gave because "it doesn't sound like it".
I never said that it couldn't be an ICEBERG (look who REALLY doesn't know how the argument started, mr. glacier, glaciers are on land, icebergs are in the water) or that the sound couldn't travel that far, I said that even if the sound was decipherable through the water, that you or a microphone wouldn't hear the sound from that far away (as in, where the icebergs would be. Have you ever heard what the fuck an iceberg sounds like when it breaks? It sounds like a really loud crack, like gunfire. That sound you heard in the recording specifically DOES NOT sound like a loud crack, even if it were very close where you would be able to easily hear it close to what the original sound would sound like. If it's not an animal, it's probable that an underwater stream bobbed the microphone around (they exist, look it up), which is another theory that it could be. It could also be a submarine pinging sonar, or a fish feeding on plankton. There's a number of things the sound could be, but icebergs are one thing that the sound wouldn't sound like. The sound is comparable to what ice cubes sound like when you put them in your drink. And before you say that they could be icebergs falling into the water, there are NO CLIFFS high enough in Antarctica to make a noise anywhere near comparable to that sound, and if there was, and an iceberg happened to drop, it wouldn't sound like that, it would sound like an explosion happening under water.
The argument started because you believed it was a giant underwater animal.
This argument is above my intellect level
I wasn't going to respond to this again because it really doesn't matter but you're being ridiculous and I honestly think if you re-read what you're saying you'd see why. But mostly because I find it amusing.
In one post you talk about how noise would be distorted to the point of being unidentifiable over the distance and then in the other post you say that you can rule stuff out because of what it sounded like.
With distortion over many kilometers can you really rule out something like this?
youtu.be
But the whole thing isn't really my point because I wasn't arguing that it was X geologic event and not Y in the first place. I was arguing that it wasn't a deep sea monster that was like the size of the Eiffel tower.
Since you're here every day you should start writing a CYOA or something
I used to masturbate onto birds at a local park. Not a thing that I'm particularly proud of but I became quite good at it. I was taking zinc supplements so I was shooting massive loads and it became something of a sport to me. For anyone interested here is your best strategy. first, you need to find an isolated spot so you don't become a sex offender. I found a short kind of channel area where I saw the pigeons would congregate. Next, you arouse yourself. I was usually content with envisioning the occasional jogging lady coming over and taking a shit on my chest and that was enough to fuel the fire but if you're not as sexually charged as me just take some porn on the go. After you're good an horny, you get some bread. My pigeons preferred white bread but healthier birds might have a taste for honey wheat or maybe even multigrain. Fat, unhealthy birds are slower and easier to hit so remember that. Once you are seated on the bench and ready to do the deed, whip your roosevelt out and scatter bread out within a few feet of you. use your judgement based on how far you know you can cum. I was a lonely and depraved soul who could hit targets the size of a thimble at distances up to 4 feet. You wait for the pigeons to begin eating and to get comfortable with your presence. At this point, you want to coo gently and talk sensually to them to gain their trust. Now you're finally ready to cum on your bird. This is a tough part because the rapid motion of masturbation is very frightening to the birds, so you have to be subtle. Once you master a technique, you simply wind it up and let it go, aiming depending on your past cumming experiences. I always came high so I would aim for the neck of the bird and catch it right in the face. It's an extremely satisfying and erotic feeling, seeing those birds reel around covered in cum and maybe even transporting it to other places in the city. Either way I haven't done it in years but every now and then I catch myself gazing wistfully at a flock of birds, cock throbbing and waiting for them to land close to me.