Are you a liberjewishan or an anarcho-faggotist? (same fucking thing)

wtf are you even trying to say

articulate yourself, nigger

no

I'm saying that everything you said is laughable and interchangeable with anarcho capitalism. Therefore I am laughing. Are you new to imageboards or just retarded?

none of it is interchangable with anarcho-capitalism, that's why you won't just write what you mean, because it's fucking retarded

I humbly disagree with you, good sir.

Grow up, kid

it's not a matter of opinion, you think that libertarians believe that we can replace all the laws with a simple axiom (the NAP) and that's not correct.

you asked for five differences, I gave you five differences, you posted nonsense in response

if you want to pick up from there, feel free

Yes it is, unless you are a faggot NWO puppet like Gary Johnson. Real libertarians believe that the NAP should be the law of the land, just like anarcho capitalists.

No, you proved that you don't know what libertarians support.

i realize that a lot of self-proclaimed libertarians on the internet say axiomatic things, so I can see where you might get confused, and I don't mean that condescendingly

but the fact is that No, libertarianism isn't married to the NAP because, yes, taken to it's logical conclusion the NAP brings us to ancapland

libertarianism is just a description of how a lot of people vote, not some rigid belief in the NAP. If you want to read more about it there is a good article here:

libertarianism.org/blog/six-reasons-libertarians-should-reject-non-aggression-principle

Dumping

...

...

its clear you didnt make this meme. the obvious messege is that tis gives you the right to murder them however you see fit in anarcho capitalist land. jews rule by law

I see this ending well

Someone needs to make a fucking ancap game

only a cuck would want to let their political counterparts get a say in how the country is run

I find these memes fucking hilarious, because it's laughable how normies see anarcho-capitalists

What would you call a country with a strong government where you aren't forced to pay taxes, but if you aren't registered as a former tax-payer or you're over 18, you aren't entitled to government services?
Also, no democracy, and laws are based on basic moral values (NAP) and not utilitarian laws.

THE JEWS ARE TRYING TO D&C PEOPLE BY CREATING A EXTREME PARODY OF A BELIEF AND THEN FORCING ANYONE WHO IS NOT THEIR SLAVE TO CONFORM TO THAT EXTREME, FUCK OFF ANCAPS, YOU ARE NOTHING LIKE LIBERTARIANS

You okay, buddy?

I gave up on lolbergs after 2012. I supported Ron Paul, but the exposure I got to some of his supporters who were calling for open borders turned me off. Then the myriad of lolberg variants started cropping up, all part of spectrum of inane children who believe themselves to be living in Mad Max.

Then I turned back to where I was in 2010, disavowing lolbergism, with studying nationalism and what was not yet called alt-right. I think that's consistent with a lot of us.

Did this actually happen? Sounds like typical EVE drama.

EVE Online, my negro.

Are there any of these memes that have even the slightest similarity to ancap paradise? Damn near every single one of these i see are nonsense with no bearing to an ancap society.

...

just one of those being right would make me nope the fuck out of such an ideology

Because no one who makes or posts them has the slightest idea about ancap theory, it's just a demonstration of their own ignorance.

Sorry i worded that poorly bit i did not mean only these specific ancap memes but all of them in general. In regards to these specific ones only the pepe is somewhat decent but in the end is not because of the purposeful wording. In ancap land the water on your land is obviously yours and no one has a right to it and they would be violating the NAP if they were to attempt to steal your water.

This is just a retarded strawman of the NAP, regardless of what Rothbard said. No sane individual sees all aggression in absolute terms, because obviously that's retarded. As David Friedman points out:

Friedman begins by stating what he considers obvious: A neighbor aiming his flashlight at someone's property is not aggression, or if it is, it is only aggression in a trivial technical sense. However, aiming at the same property with a gigawatt laser is certainly aggression by any reasonable definition. Yet both flashlight and laser shines photons onto the property, so there must be some cutoff point of how many photons one is permitted to shine upon a property before it is considered aggression. But the cutoff point cannot be found by deduction alone, because of the Sorites paradox, so the non-aggression principle is necessarily ambiguous.

The NAP is relative and disputes will be settled by private courts.

You pseudo-libertarian statists fucked up the moment you legitimise violence for the "greater good", i.e. I know what's best for society so I'm gonna use force to control it. Under democracy, a libertarian society would quickly spiral back into a nanny-state in under a decade. Basically "libertarians" are another version of cuckservatives, who would slightly lower taxes and be pro gay-marriage, except they're even more ineffectual.

If you're not a national socialist you're a traitor to your nation, your culture, and your race.

Amen

ok, thanks ancap

but what's to stop a private court from making all sorts of rulings that you don't like?

I'm a racist cyberpunk, get with the times, LARPer.

Lel, it did
theverge.com/2012/4/29/2986110/eve-online-economy-goonswarm-attack

Yes. Yes I am.

...

Oh for fuck's sake…