What is the biological limit on racial purity?

Can a Holla Forums geneticist please tell what is the cut off limit before one's genetics do not get passed on at all to a descendant?

In other words, how many generation does it take to COMPLETELY breed out shitskin DNA?

Lets say back in the 14th century a nigger somehow got into the United Kingdom and miscegenated with some of the villagers, would that actually show up in the dna of any of their descendants in a DNA test?

Doesn't any DNA test showing something like "0.1% - 5% non-white" count as statistical noise and not necessarily proof of actual shitskin genetics being present?

Should anons whose lineages are entirely European as far as they know but they take a test and find out they're got a slight stain of non-white genetics not breed?

What is the physical limit for DNA in which no genes get passed on?

How many generations are required before we can say a white population is 100% pure again after having absorbed a small number of shitskins into it long ago?

Wasn't there a southern law (mentioned in the film Free State of Jones) where I think the cut-off point it octo? So if you're just 1/16th nigger in the Southern States you'd be accepted as fully white? Was that law scientific?

What is the biological hard-limit on how long some shitskin genes can keep passed down before they are pretty much gone from the DNA?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws
sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080207140855.htm
nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html
ourworldindata.org/grapher/children-per-woman-UN?year=2015
kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/a-trillion-africans-by-2350/
eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.shtml
gcbias.org/2013/11/04/how-much-of-your-genome-do-you-inherit-from-a-particular-ancestor/
sciencemag.org/news/2014/12/genetic-study-reveals-surprising-ancestry-many-americans
hbdchick.wordpress.com/
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlnews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html
sputniWikiLeaks
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/2WikiLeaks
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmludio-recording-release.html
washingtontimes.com/news/201WikiLeaks
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmls-audio-recording-release.html
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html-audio-recording-release.html
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlio-recording-release.html
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlo-recording-release.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I guess I will have to bump this later when I suspect a population geneticist or anyone else with knowledge in this area might be on and browsing and able to provide a legitimate answer.

One of my exes is an octoroon. I didn't even know she was 1/8 nigger until she told me and showed me her DNA results.

(Not advocating racemixing, though.)

Do you know if she's saying she's 1/8th nigger because of the DNA test she did or because she actually KNOWS for sure she has a great grandnig in her family tree?

Both. Her great-grandmother on her mom's side was 100% black.

I honestly think its irrelevant because most Europeans are pure already, as are people of European descent who are outside Europe.

But let's remember- these DNA tests are not accurate. There is a tremendous amount of guessing and as of right now at least most of those tests are useless. Someone who knows more about this needs to make a info-graphic explaining it so people will stop bringing these tests up.

Well I'd like to see someone with more knowledge weigh in here as to whether any potential offspring between you and her would've counted as pure white or not.

If you have a single drop of nigger blood in you, you are tainted and deserve a rope.

sage
D/C thread

sage

What if an entire European nation is known to have an ancestor WAYYYY the fuck back that was non-white?

When exactly is the last drop of nigger blood squeezed out anyways? There's got to be a point where it's squeezed out.

Around 1/8 for blacks, 1/4 for browns.

With already mixed populations like hispanics they can look fully white after one generation of CREAMing

I'm glad we're discussing this. Racial purity is only an ideal, what really matters is genetic expression (behaviors, looks, capabilities).

We can salvage a huge portion of the globe through an Aryan Stud CREAMing program across mixed populations.

Did I fucking stutter?

I don't think we should pursue any kind of interracial breeding program at all. Anyone who is obviously a non-white mongrel should not be bred with at all. This whole thread is more a question of; should we still breed with those individuals that appear to be entirely white although they may have had a non-white ancestor going back far enough?

I know that National Socialist Germany cleaned up this whole question when it comes to jews. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws

…but I don't know what we are to do concerning arabs, currynigs, various increasily less pure caucasoids, and then negroes and mongoloid admixtures having found their way into a populace.

Would you genocide most of Italy?

Whelp for non-pure "white" it has to be atleast the third generation no racemixing in between.

It depends entirely on how many halves of each gene pair carries black genes, you're pretty much spot on about 5% or less being noise but you have to do DNA testing and some more thorough selective breeding to get desired results past a certain point.

If you're already third generation+ then it's a matter of getting DNA tested for specific undesirable genes and getting rid of it in your offspring via DNA testing all your potential partners for some baby making.

I would just use DNA tests. In the Aryan imperium, reproduction will be controlled and people will only be allowed to reproduce with others within an optimum range (which is something like between 3rd to 6th cousins iirc but we could expand it beyond that for practicality)

KILL ALL MUD BLOODS!

...

And another benefit is that this also solves to problem of "who is white." If you are going within a range then it really doesn't matter. Add in eugenics and we have Ubermensch planet and glactic imperium after a dozen generations or so.

Most of human history everyone just married 1st and 2nd cousins and although that is slightly inbreeding, there's many arguments in favour of the idea this works out pretty well, and there's also lots of famous people like Charles Darwin for example that were the product of such very close cousin marriages. Every once in awhile outbreeding a little further (3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.) should help clean things up though. Also if you go full Sparta on defective babies you can have higher rates of inbreeding I think without too much trouble.

But anyways:


Summary: Scientists have established a substantial and consistent positive correlation between the kinship of couples and the number of children and grandchildren they have. The study, which analyzes more than 200 years of deCODE's comprehensive genalogical data on the population of Iceland, shows that couples related at the level of third cousins have the greatest number of offspring. These new findings suggest that the recent and dramatic demographic shift experienced in Iceland – from a rural society to a highly urbanized one – may serve to slow population growth, as individuals are exposed to a much broader range of distantly related potential mates.

sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080207140855.htm

I'm Slavic, but my great-grandfather was a Tatar. I'm about 10% nonwhite by lineage. I probably inherited some Asian genes. If this disqualifies me from being white, say goodbye to most of modern Europe.

Its not a an interracial breeding program per se, its more of an assimilation program. Both white's population and birth rate would need to be much superior for it to work, though.

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

I started this thread and asked because I saw this post in another thread:


What if people like this are actually pure white redpills opting to stay out of the genepool over some statistical noise or such when they actually should be breeding?

This is an important matter to resolve.

It's not important at all, If niggers had 105 IQs and high impulse control and good planning skills they wouldn't be a problem. We should just have the same standards for everybody and deport or sterilize everybody who gets out of line. Pretty easy really.

It doesn't have to be a government program. It'll feel completely natural when it happens. A huge number of white men knocking up club sluts from Turkey to Argentina.

The government program will be something like this:
nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html

Offer free IUDs to the population and high time preference groups (minorities) will limit their own birthrates. We can start an NGO offering them to foreign populations as well.

Look at the chart here, birthrates are falling globally:
ourworldindata.org/grapher/children-per-woman-UN?year=2015

If we can just tip the scale a teeny bit in favor of whites (who have the agency to deliberately increase their birth rates) we can come back from demographic decline.

I do not agree. Although I am extremely aware and spend a great deal of time talking about the subhuman qualities of negroids, I will not accept law-abiding chinks, or scheming jews, or any other sorts of non-whites in my nation. Ultimately I am more concerned about demographics and racial purity than I am about how dangerous the coons are. We should certainly perform continual eugenics on our own race but we should not mix (for so many reasons besides crime/behaviour, there's reasons to do with immunity, aesthetics, physiology, and more) with other races especially ones that aren't even caucasoid.

No generations if your DNA test includes bullets. You'll never reduce it to zero otherwise.

I don't want niggers at all, I want to live in a white nation, and that's completely fair. There is no reason I can't be allowed to live in a nation founded by and for whites with only whites living in it. If other races can live in homogeneous state, whites should be able to as well.

Well, bullets or sterilization.

Hey do you happen to know what the white birthrate looks like when you subtract the mennonite birthrate in Canada and in America?

White children and pregnant white women are so fucking rare in my city that if anyone even sees a white woman who is pregnant or has a white child with her at the market people will comment on it, praise her, etc. and in those cases the woman usually only had one child.

There's so damned many white women here who simply never have children at all. The culture is such here that having children is WEIRD. I have heard groups of white women talk to each other about some other woman who actually has a child and saying how hard it must be to do that and how glad they are to not be burdened with a child and so on.

I wouldn't care about this situation at all but it's being used as an excuse to pump in shitloads of non-whites. We should welcome population decline for so many reasons but alas we're in a global race war whether we like to realize it or not.

Liberia is a black nation founded by and for blacks. It's actually illegal according to their constitution for whites to live there. The Africans there who've lived there forever and the ones that came off the boats from America as freed slaves do not get along and they fight each other btw. Liberia is a complete shithole but a pure white nation would make the whole world jealous and every single subhuman would want to make endless excuses to move there. Ain't it something the non-whites constantly whine about how racist and hateful we are and yet are desperate to live in our lands and to never leave for their own nations where they don't have to face the "oppression" of whitey anymore?

And yet even those who are mixed but look white make terrible nations, despite looking white. Your plan was tried before, and it was met with disastrous results. Die cuck, you filthy nigger

Should the redpilled woman who made this post be shot user?

Would you personally execute her?

You're not talking about hispanics / South America are you?

Which nation of white-looking but mixed people are you talking about?

Being white is about more than skin color. Behavior is determined by genetics. Just because someone with shitskin genetics looks white doesn't mean they won't act like a nigger.

Are you in a really liberal city? My city is relatively liberal, but there's still tons of little blonde children running around. Diversity seems to have made white people even whiter.

The most important thing is controlling 3rd world birth rates before they become unmanageable:
kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/a-trillion-africans-by-2350/

White conservatives are always going to have more children, so we don't really need to encourage them to breed just yet. There are still a billion whites in the world, we can't let demographic projections blackpill us before we even attempt to influence them. Borders can be redrawn anyway.

Actually how white your country looks is a good rule of thumb for its relative success. Compare Argentina to Venezuela.

The only exceptions are Slavic countries, but I think the balance was thrown off in those countries due to Communism. Historically, they've produced many geniuses comparable to western European nations.

OP said completely, and that's how you do it completely.

Don't change the subject/move the goalposts, faggot.

True but even those genes encoding for behavior get bred out or at least lose expression.


The problem is that it's a tech-giant and thousands of people here work for software companies like blackberry and RIM and so on. These people are the most pozzed, cucked, leftist retards on the continent.

At the same time, in the country-side, there's lots of Mennonites.

So as you get out of the city you have this amazing clash between the absolute degeneracy of the city and the traditionalism and Germanic values that stay strong amongst the rural populace.


Not if you include jews, arabs, central asians, hispanics, and other genetic garbage. What is the population of red/blond/brown hair and blue/green/gray/etc. eyes? That gives you a better idea of how many whites there really are.

Your percentages are subjective though and may not reflect the actual biological reality. What if that 5% is just noise? What if there is a cut-off point where one's genes fail to pass on?

Lets frame this another way, lets imagine a village of a thousand niggers, and a single white man miscegenates with a negress there, and the half-breed offspring mix into the tribe each subsequent generation, how many generations before we can declare those niggers 100% dindu again? …or is the tribe forever and ever mongrelized, despite the limited space on DNA to actually carry over the genes?

Don't know if this number is horseshit but:


is supposedly the number of blonds in the world.

He was talking about Hispanics,(not Spaniards I assume). Some people have terrible eyes and can't really tell between mongrels and pure breeds though. I have to say I really don't see many white looking mixed people.


I agree with your assessment on comparing Argentina to Venezuela and the root of the problem being race, but you were proposing trying to whiten a country by race mixing, which is niggerest thing I've ever heard. Even Argentina is kind of gay to be honest, probably because they got the least white people from Europe in the first place.

Can we just say that if you are 95% white than you are pure-white or would that be wrong?

I'd only bend to 97% at worst.

What should be the official percentage of whiteness for a white Holla Forums user to consider fucking a woman?

When are we going to have a Nuremburg laws that covers admixtures with niggers and chinks and injuns and so on?

Should we have a higher standard for whiteness than what the confederacy had?

Wouldn't the actual percentages be…

50%, 25%, 12%, 6%, and then 2%?

or is not that clean-cut?

Oh god what the fuck did I just do in my calculation there.

50%, 25%, 12%, 6%, and then 3%?

fixed

Non European races are not equal. Think about this: Would it be better to have a half European and half mongol in your midst, or a half European half black?

So you'd marry someone with a non-white great great grandparent?

I'd rather live next to the finngolian, they at least make dank memes

When can we post our DNA results and bully each other for not being white?

It would be better to have the half-black as they would be more easily detectable and exterminatable I would hope.

Also I know someone who had black grandparents and she has serious infertility problems, I wonder if mongrels down the line often have infertility problems, and produce non-viable offspring if any at all? Perhaps nature kicks in after awhile to ensure the purity of the races in this way.

Yeah, that worked out really well with the kikes, didn't it?

Race is more than IQ and impulse control. Only autistic HBD bloggers try to reduce it to that. Race includes an entire collection of personality traits. And beyond that, an ethnostate is simply the most harmonious.

Freel free to post yours, I've never bothered taking a test, because I have 300+ years of recorded lineage, and it's endless blond and red haired dutch men and women. I know I am white, regardless of what some not very accurate DNA test might say.

It is not clean-cut. You inherit 50% of your genes from your father and 50% of your genes from your mother. That said, exactly WHICH genes you inherit is up to random chance. For this reason, it is, for example, possible to be entirely unrelated to one of your four grandparents (this is in fact the case for approximately 1 out of every 8.5 million people).

Consider: Father is 50% white and 50% black. Mother is 100% white. Child inherits 50% of his genes from Mother, which will by definition be "white" genes because that's all that is available from Mother. Child also inherits 50% of his genes from Father, but these could be entirely "white" genes or entirely "black" genes or any mix in between.

More examples: Father is 75% white and 25% black. Mother is still 100% white. Child can now be as high as 25% black or as low as 0% black. Father is 25% white, 25% black, 50% asian. Mother is still 100% white. Child must still be at least 50% white (because of Mother) but all of these (and more) are valid: 50W/50A, 75W/25B, 50W/25B/25A, etc.

This is a simplification but is generally an accurate statement.

Finally someone's answering my question!

Can you give a scale for this or something that lays it out really clear?

What's the number for how many people are entirely unrelated to a great grandparent, a great great grandparent, etc.?

...

It is worth it just for Haplogroup, I think.

eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.shtml

There's no scale or any hard and fast rules really other than "23 chromosomes (22 autosomal + sex), the make-up of which is inherited ~50% from father and ~50% from mother." I use (~) to signify "about" because of (a) random genetic mutation and (b) Y/X/mt DNA inheritance rules.

No numbers exist regarding intra-familial DNA matching (grandparent/great-grandparent/etc. "relationship level" for a given a target person) because this would require comprehensive genetic survey of every person on the planet. Statistically, however, about 1 in every 8.5 million babies will be born with no genetic relationship to one of their four grandparents, and about 1 in every 4,000 babies will be born with no genetic relationship to one of their eight great-grandparents.

Another thing to keep in mind: contrary to what gets posted on /pol from time to time, yDNA-haplogroups are extremely poor indicators of racial or genetic make-up. This is because yDNA-haplogroups are passed from father to son, unchanged (barring mutation), forever. Therefore, a 100% autosomally Dutch father with yDNA R1b (very common Western European yDNA) may reproduce with a 100% autosomally Kenyan mother to produce a 50%D/50%K son with yDNA R1b. That son may then reproduce with another 100% autosomally Kenyan woman to produce a son who will then be approximately 25%D/75%K (as discussed earlier, other combinations are possible but this is the statistical mean and, due to random sampling, almost all actual children will trend to it) but will still have yDNA R1b. This process can continue for generations, eventually resulting in an effectively (if not truly) 100% Kenyan male who will still retain yDNA R1b.

TLDR: Autosomal DNA measures "race" (ancestry) while yDNA haplogroups are of little use to anyone other than anthropologists tracking pre-modern population migrations.

Why is "French & German" paired together there?

Franks are Germanic. Ultimately, however, you should be wary of genetic tests that group people according to nationalities (especially when "British and Irish" is a group - is this a Anglo/Celtic composite or something else?). Remember, Nationality and Genetic Composition are different things.

Do you have statistics for great-great-grandparents?

What is your advice for us on Holla Forums? If you were to make your own Nuremburg laws or make an info-pic where should the cut off be?

Wouldn't statistics alone give us a good idea of where that cut-off point should be?

What is your advice for purebreds who are trying to find a rare redpilled mate, should they toss aside those 5% non-whites and such?

Do we all have to get extensive DNA-testing done? What if we don't want to do that, what should our rule of thumb be?


France is Western Europe, Germany is central Europe. France has the Basque and so on. They aren't even geographically that close.

Oooh I have some bad new user…

The information in DNA isn't like chemicals being diluted to the ocean or something, where they will always be detectable in some quantity, it's completely possible and common for someone to have had a nigger or indian ancestor and for that genetic information to have been overwritten and not appear on a test. Australians were using this fact in their scheme to basically genocide aboriginals

They are grouped together like that because Europe has a long and confusing racial history, and it isn't exactly easy (or PC) to distinguish between the various subraces of Europe (if they even exist in any 'pure' form today). Look at some of the debates between Mediterranism and Nordicism during the early 1900's to see just how complicated it could possibly be, or some of the early Nazi racial theories.

Also, by my understanding modern French and modern Germans are close enough to be pretty genetically similar . They aren't exactly racially homogeneous.

The nationality basis of the tests is meant to be taken with a grain of salt (you can even further narrow the tests so they are more accurate, all it would change though is groups like "Scandinavian" to "Broadly Northern European").

The tests don't try to identify and narrow down the various subraces of Europe, but instead is more along the lines of, there are a lot of these genes in France today, and a lot of these genes exist in Eastern Europe, etc etc.

As for the British & Irish I have read that they are pretty genetically similar today as well, but I cannot find my source at this moment in time. Both are pretty much mixes of various Indo-European subraces (just like most of Europe).


Slav is Aryan :^)

The answer is either never or random.
Your DNA crosses over and swaps sections with other chromosomes before it turns into sperm or eggs meaning you can pass on genes from both your mother and father on a single chromosome. Because of this, some pieces of nigger might still be in the half-half-etc-cast's DNA despite hundreds of generations of white partners. There is no hard limit because this process is random (as far as we can tell).

It's easier to look at it on a dilution scale where each generation the nigger blood is diluted by half. It takes a half-cast's offspring 7 generations to have individuals over 99% white however 3 is enough to get to 87.5% with rapidly diminishing returns.

The inheritance of nigger genes appears to follow a mostly dominant pattern while the genes that make whites great (including temperament and intelligence apparently) follow a recessive pattern, very little nigger may show through despite a huge amount of dilution. Also very important to remember even skin colour does not have simple Mendelian inheritance and there are many unknown factors for the more complex features (like int and temp) that have an effect on the expressed traits.

Taking both the above into account and we can realistically say someone with >95% white blood (5 generations from half cast or 1/32) and no characteristic [other race] phenotypes (sloped head, low intelligence, violent without anger, etc) would be enough to consider someone "pure" white. In a supermajority white nation where the rate of pure white breeding is higher than every other kind of breeding (including non-pure white + white breeding), the purity allowed could even be lower and have no statistically significant effect.

Important side note
The traits themselves are more valuable than purity. It just so happens that whites have the best set (as shown by historical achievements). If someone is a fucking genius, strong, and beautiful note non-whites, especially niggers, I find have no beauty what so ever so that rules out the commonly shitposted "beautiful niggress" which basically just looks like a shaved gorilla or the "definitely not downs syndrome, makeup and camera angles" gook but are below the purity limit, they should still breed. As a general rule, they will be few and far between meaning the effect they will have on the purity of the whole will be minimal however what they (and potentially their children) can achieve would be of far greater value than any potential risks of passing on hidden, undesirable genes.

Remember: the only reason why one race is better than another is because of their traits. Purity means nothing if what is conserved is not good to begin with.

Should add that it only swaps with homologous pairs (the same number chromosome but from different parents).

That sounds a little extreme, you must be great at parties.

end my suffering

Typical burger, wouldn't be too concerned.

One drop rule. Only mongrels disagree.

Not according to that study that got stickied a little bit ago. besides, if the right wing revolution happens and Holla Forums tier people get put in charge white nations (however unlikely that is), I may end up getting shoahed

hello mr. lampshadeberg

reported to the internet police for talking down to a chosen. Enjoy your reeducation camp, goy filth.

Those DNA tests are alot of bullshit.
They give you a rough estimate, but it certainly cant figure out your ancestry down to 1/10th
Theres no need to be an autist about racial purity, the Nazis werent either (pic related).
Anything that looks like you is fine, the various white peoples have incredible genetic differences anyway.

/thread

D&C thread.

better to have mongol genes than to have nigger genes

This is what slavic mudbloods actually believe

gcbias.org/2013/11/04/how-much-of-your-genome-do-you-inherit-from-a-particular-ancestor/

Six generations will purify

Depends on the purity of each partner. There's no set number of generations.

The best system is a caste system and strict reproductive control for at least 4-5 generations. Preferably longer.

100% pure nordics known as Fullbloods should produce 12 children per woman minimum.

Then various castes for lower grades. Lower than 90% purity should be used as colonial troops & managers.

Dysgenic Fullbloods should marry the eugenic 95% castes and have fewer children than Fullblood couples.

Dysgenic 95'ers should marry eugenic 90'ers.

Dysgenic 90'ers should be sent to the colonies to beat the negroes into submission and make sure they're sticking to their 1-child-and-then-sterilized regime of world demudification in exchange for healthcare so their 1 niglet/pajeet/whatever doesn't die.

A rigid hierarchy of castes from full nordic on down to the muds and the negro at the bottom marked for massive depopulation and then some kind of hybridization into a blasian undercaste to fully phase out the negro over 10-20 generations.

That only applies to jews you illiterate mongoloid niggerlover

Pretty much this, we should use the Nuremberg laws but replace jews with niggers.
It is absolutely retarded wanting to gas someone because they got some nigger blood dating from 2000 years ago.

Not to mention that they could still become honorary whites if they perform well enough for the nation.

Nigger wtf are you doing polluting our gene pool? Do you not understand that feels can fuck over the purity of our race forever? Once we lose 100% pure, we can never get it back again.

Throughout world history, nordic genes have flowed downwards. Just a few generations of very mild upward flow has already fucked us significantly and soon there will be no hope of ever restoring purity.

But instead of flat cut off rates, a caste system restores the natural flow or nordic superiority down through the races. Even the negro can have some of our neanderthal glory, after it radiates down the caste ladder through the mongrelized whites, the half whites, the hapas, the orientals, the pajeets, the dune coons, the mulattoes, and finally to the blacker-than-black-cuz-im-black-yall africans.

Aren't they located within the Iberian Peninsula?


And sadly those debates are still springing up and won't seem to end, weren't both united under the term of the "White race"? It's like we keep forgetting that, because of a few cases, that are obviously not white.

People suggesting that olive skinned moor-blooded Mediterraneans are superior to Nordics will be grounds for capital punishment by firing squad to the back of the skull.

Just sterilize them.

Already on it user and by "it", I mean my mexican fiancé, we have a girl on the way and she's going to be very white

Hey I'm a med, and I don't want any more in-fighting, my family does not have any moorish traces, I live near the french border, and most of my family seems to come from the same area, not every med has had any contact with the moors.

I just want peace between meds and nords for once so we can focus on other topics.

The only race I want genocided outright are Jews.

Heavily managed depopulation to sustainable levels is sufficient for other races.

1 billion Africans is about 950,000,000 too many, though.
On a forced one child policy, you cut the breeding population in half each generation while still allowing the chimps to have some reproductive self-determination.

Gen 1: 1000m -> Gen 2: 500m -> Gen 3: 250m -> Gen 4: 125m -> gen 5: 62.5m -> Gen 6: 31.3m

Average age at first birth is 19 y/o, so this is 114 years and does not factor in deaths, anti-natalism, and natural sterility which is as high as an extra 10% per generation in first world countries. But it'd take probably 100 years to turn Africa first world anyway.

why even bother

if you want an honest answer, it depends on selection pressure. people ill suited to there environment don't have as many kids. depending on the environment it could take as little as 3 generations, or propagate across the whole population.

I think mass slaughter would provoke way less rebellion than trying to hunt down every last woman and administer sterilization shots.

And a cleverer way still would be to implement my plan which prevents mass-rebellion, and then divide the population up into sectors and have a system that rates each sector's inhabitants by acts of rebellion and sabotage and sterilizes or exterminates particularly problematic sectors to accelerate depopulation and break the will to resist.

honestly how much resistance could a bunch of starving niggers possibly provide? We could offer them free food and "vaccines" or something similar if it seemed that much of a problem.


niggers are not as intelligent as you believe them to be, I think. IMHO they will probably chimp regardless and there is nothing to be gained by trying to appease them or whatever

Why not? I mean, if we are kike-free and do it in the colonies.

you guys hate blacks for no reason fuck you guys

yeah there's no raisin for it

On a continental scale, I believe mulattoes and race traitors would be providing the intelligence, such as it is, and you can't be too careful. Tricking them into sterilization is certainly viable, but it's rather dishonorable. I'd rather do things out in the open and benevolently for our own sake, not theirs.

The resistance to forced sterilization would be a billion niggers suddenly changed from extremely low morale chimps to chimps imbued with unbreakable morale in resisting an in-no-way-uncertain-genocide. We could do it, yeah, but at that point you might as well just butcher them to the last man woman and child. It would cost many white lives, but it could be done. I honestly don't think nigs are worth even one white life, not even for the task of disposing of them.

I'd like to employ 90 IQ+ Africans as the shocktroops, managed by impure white colonial officers, to extract resources and reduce population in a humane and honorable way.

And punishing entire sectors by the actions of their members is genius because it forces them to police their own so it's black hands lynching black thugs to keep from having their daughters sterilized.

i love myself some cherrypicked information too, racist

Where da fuck you think you is?

people like you should be locked up and put in solitary confinement, people just have darker skin than you and that's fine… fucking bunch of racists

The alternative to a racist like me are the racists who want you exterminated. You will not get a third option. We have already won.

BTW I'm for making an exception for known grievance whores such as yourself, so you'll be killed regardless of whether moderate racists or whitesonlyplanet racists win.

more nonsensical ramblings just like the other people on this site.. i expected this to be a political discussion form but all of you people are just short sighted, head up the ass racists. you guys ned psychiatric help

No one wants to debate a lower life-form. You couldn't say anything interesting if your daughter's fertility depended on it.

Thats just edgy bullshit, your propably couldnt even pull the trigger yourself.
Putting up reservations is the only humane thing to do. Literally the only one.
I actually feel bad for the niggers and so should all of you because empathy is what makes white people great.

Its not their fault they chimp out, they just cant function correctly in a western society. Its the same with the arabs in europe.
They come in hope of riches (or get actively imported by jews), but they cant adapt. Theyre used to jungle law and strict hirarchies, and thats whats imprinted on their genes aswell. When they encounter liberal westerners you get the well known results.
No immediate and harsh enforcement of rules leads to rampant crime, which leads to resentment.
Lack of proper motivation, by means of a foreman with a stick, leads to bad performance and unemployment.
Eventually you end up with ghettos and parrallel societies, with the minorities being propped up by crime and benefits at the expense of the taxpayers.
Once the going gets tough, the chimpouts start.

Anyone who looks at this with open eyes can only conclude that nobody benefits here (exept the jews).
The only way the niggers will be happy is by letting them make their own society without interference and imposing western values. Yes theyre gonna kill eachother over trivial bullshit and revel in torturing their enemies, but thats just how they like it.

A lot of people understandably view our compassion as a fatal flaw in our software. I think you're right to an extent, but we can't just leave them to their own devices – that is the very compassion malfunction that got us in this mess. The Boers let the native blacks breed out of control and then got shoah'd.

Strict sterilization regimes for population reduction and management are the only viable solution. After about 10 generations something like a reservation system would become possible.

Checked.

But these are mathematical models that don't work out in real life.

Beyond your father and mother, from which you get half your DNA from each, it's never mathematical after that.

I've read articles written by people who had their children and grandparents all tested. One child got 30% of grandmothers DNA while another got 22%.

There are a lot of people who are taking the test and finding out they have African ancestry. I find this questionable, and most are in the range of 3%.

I was shocked to find I had 3% African ancestry from Ivory Coast/Ghana. WTF?

I've researched my family pretty well, and have most lines back to my immigrant ancestor. No one on either side has ANY black features at all. All the old photos I have of family are very, very white.

I read an article written by a man who had the same thing occur. 3% means that you had an African as a 4th Great ancestor. I don't have every one of my lines back that far. A few just disappear from the record.

Depends partly on luck and which genetics the parent ends up passing down.

nigger tier reasoning

Trying to prevent a population from breeding is a form of genocide. That's why the term "white genocide" holds any truth. Someone's getting genocided at this point, I prefer it to not be us.

Why not here, and why not now?

I'm 3% nigger, according to Ancestry.

Yeah, but he was likening my form of genocide to hunting down every nigger we can find and putting them on a stake Vlad the impaler style. He went all boo hoo muh poor niggers didn't choose to be niggers, but I really can't think of a more practical and merciful way to remove those subhumans from the face of earth

88%

There isn't any cutoff. You probably still have a codon or two from a non-cellular RNA replicator 3 billion years previous.

You most definitely have a lot of DNA in common with the same ancestor as Robert Mugabe, but that's not the point. You also have a lot of DNA in common with an amoeba, that doesn't make you a fucking amoeba.

The question you should be asking is at what point do the genetics of a white man no longer provide the qualities associated with whiteness.
So list the qualities you think whiteness has (intelligence? control of aggression? pale skin?) and maybe I can answer your question.

RACIAL DNA TESTS AS THEY'RE DONE TODAY HAVE SEVERE FLAWS, DO NOT RELY ON THEM 100%

They cant breed out of control without subsidies and outside interference.
Youd need large, strictly walled off reservations.
But yea, some kind of population control should propably happen beforehand, otherwise there would be exessive violence as the overpopulated areas starve to death without food imports.

Exterminate them all with a biological plague that only targets niggers. That would save them decades of having to live around niggers.

2% is the most impurity I would accept as white. That is a reasonable amount as most Europeans have 1% of impurity in their genes.

If they aren't at least 98% white, they aren't white.

2%? You get 3% at 4th great grandparent, and beyond that generation 1% is the most anyone will have.

I'm off by one. It's not going to affect me, though. I'll still come here to read and post, even if I'm not 100% pure Bavarian phenotype.

Get a DNA test and see if you're 90%+ white if you are then you're good.

It's a hundred bucks for the basic test. That's not a lot of money for that knowledge.

"At least 3.5% of European Americans carry African ancestry, though the averages vary significantly by state. In South Carolina and Louisiana, about 12% of European Americans have at least 1% African ancestry. In Louisiana, too, about 8% of European Americans carry at least 1% Native American ancestry."

You can't help who your ancestors were. Would knowing really change your beliefs? If so, you should think about how you arrived at them.

sciencemag.org/news/2014/12/genetic-study-reveals-surprising-ancestry-many-americans

Not true for all populations.

There has been prohibition on cousin marriages in Western Europe since the early middle ages.

hbdchick.wordpress.com/

no

Definitely, 100%

I bet you're 100% aryan phenotype right?

Yes

16 verified generations of pure blooded white ancestors.

This entire thread reeks of summer Holla Forumslacks who are so insecure about their own heritage that they will non unironically say that they will exterminate anyone is not AT THE VERY LEAST 99% white.

But it needs to be very, very strict. Just a few exceptions each generation and eventually you get India or Mexico.


No, of course not. You should have racially pure eugenic men doing double-duty.


Yes, but remember mean reversion. A smart nig will likely have children dumber than an average white.


The scientific way to look at this is to find natural variation in genetic distance for a group and then see how long before the crossbreed falls within that variation.

For example, if a pure Englishman breed a pure Ashkenazi girl, their mischling daughter is already about as distant from English genes as a Tuscan is. If the mischling daughter is bred by another pure Englishman, her 1/4-jew daughter is hovering right outside the English cluster. If the 1/4-jew daughter is bred by a third pure Englishman, her 1/8-jew children's genes will be indistinguishable from other English children on a PCA.

Of course, greater initial genetic distance requires further breeding. But the power of exponential numbers helps.

Two caveats:

1/Y-chromosomes complicate things because they don't recombine, and have lots of important genes. A line of foreign men will never genetically assimilate. (On the other hand, this means once a population has been thoroughly bleached the native Y-chromosome will never recover.)

2/This is talking about genes, not traits. East Asians have different genes for many of the same traits as whites, so a 1/4 asian who is phenotypically identical is still obvious on the PCA

Underrated post.

it's 1/32.

Infinite amount of them. Our DNA is still identifiable as a monkey dscendant's one, after all those generations.

Those of you want to breed out pure-bred niggers and chinks don't you think those populations should be retained in very small numbers on reserves for future medical, anthropological, etc. research?

Don't blanda with them.

I propose we:

Just do it on the best looking Indian women, abort the males and just segregate or kill the rest.

You mean 1st cousins right?

I doubt it really became a big thing to prevent cousin marriages until the New World shit started.

This really does not give a clear answer.

the welsh and scottish fucked that up, but besides that I'm 100% white
and american

Yes it does you dumb nigger.

Ok should pic related be the official litmus test of whiteness then?

I say we kill off all of those who are obviously not white first. Then we solve the problem of shitskin DNA.

What I'm describing is a system where Nordics are producing the most children, and forbidden to marry outside of their caste. Think of it like air pressure, you increase the pressure and the nordic genes begin to flow outwards. Their brown eyed and brown haired children marry a 99% pure light-eyed ubermensch with high IQ, no hereditary baldness, no myopia, no genetic diseases, etc.

Thus the dysgenic fullblood gets remediation and the 99'er becomes a 99.5'er.

As for men doing double duty, that's up to them. Polygamy should be legalized but not forced. I want a caste system so that we can allow people to pick their own mates, as long as they're staying in the limits of the government designated castes based on racial purity and sorted by eugenic traits.

All of society moves upwards into progressively finer castes. Within 6 generations the entire population is effectively fullblooded nordic phenotypes with fractionally trace amounts of genepollution.

...

For example, I know a ginger octaroon. I had him picked out for an octaroon the instant I saw him though because he had obvious nigger facial features. This guy would not be White.

But I've also known multiple people who say they're part Indian. By looking at them it's really impossible to tell unless you're really really looking for raised cheekbones, which appear in certain White populations anyway. These people would be White.

When dealing with people of questionable Whiteness - say a Mexican who's obviously majority Spaniard but could pass for either a Mediterranean White or a mestizo - I rely on that individual's own self-identification. I'll usually refer to the person in question as a White person, and if he balks and tries to correct me then I write him off as a shitskin.

I'd never settle down with a Mediterranean anyways. I might donate sperm to their women but I don't want to raise children with one of them.

Some shill said that making people fight with each other over subrace was a part of their job.

Resemblance between bottom right female and Michael Obama is uncanny.

No, faggot. If it's European in ancestry then it's white. If a Middle Easterner "looks" white, that doesn't matter one bit.

lol

Alright then make your own infopic otherwise mine's going to be official and make sure you are specific enough that there's no room for debate over how much European ancestry is needed.

95% percent castes should just be sterilized tbh

Looks like you took inspiration from the Soviet Union.

You would have to genocide most of Eastern Europe too, because they have slight Mongoloid admixture.

Agreed. 100 percent European here. 0 Ashkenazim. GAS ALL OTHERS.

OY VEY! Maybe you can apply for Israeli citizenship.

Where the fuck do you think you are, nigger? Get out.

On second thoughts, stay here. You'll learn how wrong you are.

It depends on the traits you're trying to breed out, how well the afflicted can integrate (both in terms of their natural behavior and their appearance), and how cold-blooded you're willing to be.

Jews jew because they have too many alleles for mental illnesses and personality disorders, and because their intelligence is out of whack. High verbal IQ means they're good at persuasion. Retard-level visual/spatial IQ means that they can't easily empathize with others and they suck at anything requiring mental visualization and manipulation of 3D objects forward and backwards in time (ie, cause and effect). When combined with their high verbal IQ this means they're very good at persuading THEMSELVES to believe anything, but they're just smart enough to be anxious about it (which actually makes them more effective, similar to how predatory animals are anxious after making a kill). Other than that jew mathematical IQ isn't anything to write home about, but they aren't too dumb.

Asians are better than jews but not by a lot. Very high mathematical IQ and superhuman memorization abilities, probably due to social/sexual selection pressures in their societies. When your language has over 60,000 characters and you must be a scholar, a conformist, and be able to paint your alphabet you select for people who are good at memorization, social conformity in the face of disaster, and hand-eye coordination. Their visual/spatial intelligence isn't that bad (and there are plenty of outliers that are as good as or better than the average European), but it's not anywhere near as good as Europeans.

Europeans are very balanced between these three forms of intelligence.

Africans are mathematically retarded. They have between 12% and 20% more testosterone than Europeans - which explains why they are still functional in terms of hand-eye coordination and applied artistic ability - but their ability to visualize or understand the concept of consequences if awful. Verbal intelligence is hit or miss, but it's usually very low.

Australoids aren't human and they don't belong in this discussion. Kill the men, force the women to breed half-European girls, and do it again until the girls can pass as European - it won't take as long though since their traits are strongly recessive.

Asians probably require 75% European admixture to allow them to freely exist in European societies. This applies to Indios too, as they are just weird Asians. The dumber Asians and Mestizos will be taken care of by the complete lack of social services for mestizos and physical removal of the more violent, criminal, and subversive specimens.

Africans and jews must be at least 87.5% European admixture, but for different reasons.

Africans because they don't look human until they are almost 90% European. They will suffer anxiety from this and will probably chimp out of their IQ isn't very high. Plus their IQs are so low that it will take 3 generations of White men impregnating their women to reach this point.

Jews above 87.5% ethnic European admixture retain most of their rabbit-like sex drive and tendency to be perverts, but they lose a lot of the ethnocentrism (or the ethnocentrism is redirected towards their majority European ancestry). They don't have much anxiety, and they generally look only slightly spooky.

tl;dr

1. Kill or sterilize all the men.
2. Impregnate all the women with girls (and use high quality sperm donors with blond/red hair, blue/gray eyes, and a very high IQ).
3. Repeat when the girls turn 18 until you reach the correct admmixture.

Honestly if your great grandparents are proven European, and you have European facial features as well, with light skin, you should be considered white. Not even Hitler was that strict.

As far back as I can trace, I'm white. I have waves in my hair, kill me.

A lot of those blonde kids will lose their blonde hair when they get older.

Source: had blonde hair when I was a kid. it darkened with age.

For what possible purpose?

Just purge them all for christ's sake.

That's a terrible idea. Just make them legally recognized as animals again and ban miscegenation with them and kill all the half-breeds. I know a 1/8th abbo woman who has light blond hair and blue eyes but she's still completely retarded and dysfunctional, despite looking like like a nordic woman. Many of them can't even breed with Europeans and produce viable offspring, which just goes to show how divergent they are.

How hard would it be to make a few modifications with a virus that cause different races to be unable to successfully reproduce together?

If we could just make it impossible for white-chink and white-black couplings to result in viable offspring we'd have solved a lot of issues and the whole thing would be so subtle, nobody would really notice or understand why suddenly race traitors can't produce half-breeds anymore.

You are beyond retarded. Why the fuck would you kill all the men but then voluntarily mate with the women? This whole thread reeks of shills. Why would you take sperm donations and give them to inferior races? You know what's better than 87.6%? 100 percent. And luckily, there are still plenty of those people left. You can't whiten a population. It won't work. History shows this. Even the slightest admixture ruins everything. The only thing you can do is genocide the place and recolonize it. Focus resources on people who are already pure and keep everyone else the fuck away or shoot on sight.

what about their BRAIN?

their skin might become lighter, but will take thousands of years for the biological evolution to bring their brain at the same level.

race is 99% about the BRAIN and 1% above the skin colour.

look at all the European contributions to the mankind, Somalia and Saudi Arabia will never in 1000 of years give you von Braun or Beethoven

You'd first need a baseline for what constitutes "good" DNA. We don't have that data. What we do know is that whites have statistically higher intelligence scores than non-whites. There is evidence to suggest that affluent Asians can score as high as whites on these tests, but an Asian culture has yet to produce the equivalent of a Newton or a Galileo. At most, they have Confucius, who told them to never rock the boat and maintain social harmony… Which is the antithesis of innovation.

And a negro culture has yet to produce any sort of innovator whatsoever.

So is it genetic? It might be. But we don't have the evidence to say one way or the other.

Don't think too hard about it. As long as you look and act white you're white.

See

Praise kek.

100% bavarian phenotype goy!


Also b2d36e is a jew trying to turn us against eachother.

(Heil'd)
I don't really care. No mercy for the enemies of the Nordics. I believe in a Whiteopia for all Whites, but only if it preserves the nordic race. If the nordic race gets polluted beyond the point where purity can be restored then it's over and I don't give a fuck about moor-bloods and hun-bloods.

Well, today I realised just how shitty Holla Forums has become. Too many Redditors and 4cuckers who don't understand the importance of race and are desperate to avoid hurting people's feelings.

...

Be honest, how many of you cucks pushing for acceptance of mixed people are mixed yourselves? I'm willing to bet the vast majority of you also support Milo Fagopolis.

I mean, I know for a fact that there's a couple of non-whites (one spic and one half-caste) roaming around here.

So I'm curious to see just how many others there are, my bet is that a good portion of "Americans" are actually shitskins.

saved

Good read user.

pic related

Funny that he says that in 2012 we aren't worth his time because we are "dying".

I bet now he knows how much he fucked up seeing as Holla Forums is making it into mainstream and our numbers have increased immensely.


You ^ see


You're nothing but a kike. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if you were the kike who wrote that.

GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW

So pic related.

..and we should ban mixing with people that don't look and act white.

You have the right idea and I salute your trips. However, chromosomes don't get recombinated until gametes are formed. Take a half-human, half of its chromosomes are going to be fully human; create a gamete from just those chromosomes for it and take another gamete from an unrelated White, then the White children you made for it are going to be fully its children and fully White.

one drop rule for niggers.1/16 for jewish admixture as long as they don't indentify as jews. 1/16 for other sandniggers too. full acceptance for hapas.

all scandanavians have some north asian admixture too. Asian admixture should not be worried about.

Hapa detected.

Elliot Rodgers are abominations.

You all are pathetic creatures and it's only humane to euthanize you.

poor neanderthal being surrounded by homo erectus niggers.

Elliot Rodgers was part jewish. That was the problem. Also i'm not a hapa.

Kill yourself, you managed to breed with a race that's trying to exterminate you

...

...

...

...

...

...

We need a final solution to the nigger problem. This will be the biggest political issue of the century.

Holy shit, I need to update my WAIP, can you get these all up on mega? This is good stuff that should flesh out my folders better.

most jews have african admixture.

The best tool to remove the nigger genes is napalm. Sage

1. sauce
2. I don't know of any Jewish ancestor, only a "black dutch", which means I should have middle eastern as well, which leads me to believe that the test is either wrong, or that shit was put there on purpose. Idk though.

Can you just google jewish genetics? i'm drunk and tired. North africans and Middle-easterners often do too. Its not much but real. spaniards and southern italians do too btw. feels good being german/scandanavian.

source? sounds fucking hilarious

The problem is that essentially every white country is being wrecked by mass immigration. And unless these people are removed from our gene pools shitskin genetics will contaminate the whole of the population. There won't be a way to dilute it because there won't be a source of purity left.

America for example if the current demographics mixed evenly it would create a mulatto-mestizo hybrid race with a large resemblance to Puerto Ricans.

He answered OPs question perfectly, it's just that the question wasn't phrased right.

It's impossible to give a good answer to a bad question, this guy even tells you what question you should be asking.

The racial limit for jews is full blown inbred Tay Sachs.

I am 101% white. We should kill everyone 100% and below.

bump for the infographs

There may be a day of the rope in Yuropoor countries, but America, at least the South, will be a Christian republic after any happenings. Guns and God is our heritage.

wat do Holla Forums? My GF is nearly Holla Forums incarnate, (with my guidance, of course), and all the major categories for acceptable wife and mother she hits, except, now I find out she's 1/8 fucking Indian.

Eh. could be worse. Could be much worse.

Remember that there's no such thing as 100% white, because there are no white communities that have been isolated for thousands and thousands of years, unlike Africans and Abos.

I tell ya hwat; read about the ancient traditions of gauls, germanics celts etc and compare it with those of native americans. If you find some objectionable discrepancy, feel free to end things.

Remember that we are descended from hellenized and romanized tribes of europeans.

Nuremberg laws required quarter Jews to marry German, stop being a sperg

I can't believe you fags are this autistic.

uhg

I've explained this before. It goes off of the same logic as natural born citizen in the US.

Great grandparent and later is fine for dirt. As long as all future aren't dirt obviously if GGP are dirt then one grandparent is 1/2 dirt, parents is 1/4 dirt etc.

The reason;
Most people either don't know there great grand parents at all due to them being dead before birth, or only know them for a few years.

From that the shitskin heritage can not directly be impressed upon you directly.

The same reasoning is explained and used for natural born citizen but it isn't extended so far.

Though the >(1) makes me feel this is D&C and I fell for it.

Only Jews care about le blond blue eyes meem

That's probably what I'll do, just wanted to run it by the "brown eyes = non-white" crowd here.


Do you know where you are?


No D&C. Genuine issue that recently came up. I just had to walk away from the computer for 10 minutes. Shit.

Well, as a brown/brown and with evidence that brown eyes are in fact, White, I have no problem with it. Dad had blue eyes, mom had brown and that's where I got it. Just seeing the d&c Nordicists on here gets tiresome.

But was genuinely curious if octoroon or less was OK if it's the "right" type of mix. Her ancestors were settlers on the frontier and more men than women made the trip, so I assume it was a male pioneer who wifed up some squaw. I understand that, and while I don't like it, I guess it's not the worst possible case.

These "X% European" or "Y% Asian" statistics are only done relative to samples taken from a control population. E.g. the company takes DNA samples from a bunch of Amerindians to provide a reference for what Amerindian DNA looks like. They aren't 100% accurate but they are accurate enough that if it says you're part something you probably are.

That being said you inherit roughly 50% of your DNA from each parent so one nonwhite ancestor would be

So DNA tests for ancestry aren't really that accurate?

The ones that determine parentage are still fairly airtight, correct?

Right. What I'm saying, though, is that as long as eugenic pure women all have eugenic pure husbands, there is no point in commanding eugenic pure men to stay within-caste beyond that - the more non-nordic women who have their quota of kids with one of them, the better.


Don't worry about it. In the 19th c. most "full-blooded" injuns were already mostly white.

Even were she really 1/8 non-white, I don't think 1/8 or even 1/4 matters right now. This isn't the ethnostate, we're still fighting for it. Marginal whites (Irish, Sicilians, Slavs) are fighting harder for the West than pure nordics because the nordics have this otherworldly calmness/objectivity.

well mitochondrial dna is passed mother to children every generation while the y (male gene) is passed father to son. each of these have the same amount of genetic drift ass any other gene but they do not mix together so.

if you castrate the males from a shitskin father and smash the heads of the daughters of a shitskin you can theoretically breed them out but still.

all falls down to 1/2 from father 1/2 from mother
a random number from 0/2 to 1/2 from each grandparent (save y and mitochondrial dna) as you kinda just get random genes passed down as part of the 1/2 from parents so you could theoretically have no shared dna from your mothers father or your fathers mother but you probably do and it all averages out 50/50 or rather 25/25/25/25 from grandparents

but then you also have intestinal bacteria that have been shown to affect diet and such witch are passed down threw a mix of rather intimate contact and general "contamination" sharing plates with children. of course this being necessary and all but this is getting off topic.

long story short you cant take shit out of the gene pool but you can keep removing unsavory genes. but even then you have to realize that we are always moving forward and the genetic adaptations the social adaptations of our forefathers are not necessarily what will survive. but part of removing bad genes is keeping the iq average up, removing shit like sickle cell desese ( a genetic adaptation of niggers to survive malaria at the cost of 10-20 years of life expectancy) and the damage caused to a species when you mix random ones together. such as the lack of proper organ doners for mutts. and with the almost random appearance of recessive traits in mixed populations.

Mitochondria don't seem to code for any important behavioral differences, though. It's unrealistic to breed out the mtDNA because the whole premise of bleaching a group is to use foreign wombs to make white babies (over time)

Interesting phenomenon. And you have to understand that a lot of interesting, seemingly intelligent things happen during mitosis that are not at all understood. But mixed children if bred with purebreds will in some circumstances themselves have pure children. That is to say, if a mulatto and a white has children, that child could be "pure" mulatto, or pure white, or somewhere inbetween. But what's interesting is that it's possible for the pure white outcome to happen at all.

You can extrapolate this to say that, in all likelihood a dominant white society will eventually completely breed out any taint. And vice versa, a dominant immigrant society will eventually completely wipe out the genes of the natives.

witch is fucking retarded do to the fact that mitochondrial dna is inherited mother to children so you fuck a nigger to spread your "seed" and make them white is fucking retarded as their is a chunk that you have no influence over. and to say that mitochondria have nothing to do with overall health is fucking retarded.

QUIT YOUR RACE MIXING BULLSHIT IT WONT WORK.

SAY IT WITH ME

FUCK OFF KIKE

High IQ creative 1/4 whites better than trailer trash whites who are pure.

I'm a blond haired blue eyed man though so I care very much about keeping it that way for my children.

Shlomo please. What is the word for the fallacy you just put forward? False equivalence I think?

Gene therapy will fix most mixtures. However gene therapy should not be used as a means of relieving responsibility. What needs to be done is that we must minimize race mixing and instill an indomitable sense of racial identity in whites. Once we reach a point where whites are for the most part secure and safe in their lands, we can concentrate on purifying the gene pool through gene therapy.

The future of eugenics is so bright that I can't even see and sunglasses are for fags.

No, the fact is, each broad population group is a competing tribal unit. Europeans can mix together and become 'white' if need be. This is not a purely 'American' phenomenon if the term means USA, since it's something that happened in literally every single colonial nation where there was any major population transfer from Europe to the colony and any large degree of contact with shitskin natives. Your fairer Europeans innately distinguish themselves as 'white' and the other as 'brown' or 'black'; even if there is mixing, whites come out on top.

The Anglo and Dutch colonies pulled this off with the least mixing, and everywhere you see the same 'white v. red/brown/black' dynamic (whether the thirteen colonies/USA, Canada, Australia, or South Africa). The Spanish and Portuguese colonies had the most mixing, but still the same racial hierarchy exists.

Why is this important? I highlight this because it's a recurring theme in history and societies. Like I've said before, there are small differences between Norfolkers and Lancastrians. There are yet larger differences between Englishmen and Italians. But there are still larger differences between Europeans and East Asians, and the largest between either of those groups and Sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aborigines, or pygmies. Even setting aside behavioral differences for the moment, you're going to see conflicts of interest merely between these groups because of the sheer genetic difference. Were men any other creature, the distances are large enough that we could devise at least a few subspecies.

Aesthetics, behavior, and cognition are complimentary. IQ nationalists are little shits who would eagerly abandon their own people if some androids or aliens who could calculate problems 10-20% faster showed up on their doorstep. They are, in effect, traitors to Europe and should be viewed warily as useful tools at best.

So if I'm a "white" American with a fraction of Red Indian blood, is it ok for me to have children with a Polish QT I've been talking with who claims to have some Tartar in her? That way I could have a mostly white wife without spreading the mud.

Agreed. Just expel or sterilize them. All white nations need to do this.

It will be.

Empirically wrong. My siblings and I are 1/16th Indian. We all have blonde hair and blue/green eyes with very pale skin and above average IQ's. It would be impossible for anyone to know without taking a blood sample.

Now i have to ask you a question Holla Forums, as a Sardinian, do you think am i okay, or should i have to gas myself?

...

POLYGAMY IS ILLEGAL TO MAKE IT HARDER FOR WHITES TO REPOPULATE

And for alpha males to monopolize females and further spread their genes.

Majority of whites are pure already, it's the burgers and those living outside of Europe that need to check themselves.

To be honest though, given the random nature of genetic transfers, anything less than 10% should be considered safe. It can so happen that there might be no black genes after 3 generations or it might be 75%, but those things are usually visible as externally visual prototypes are usually clustered and thus appear together.

it is a multi pronged assault against us…

meant phenotypes, bloody autocorrect.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Burgerclaps who think they're white are almost always pure. Occasionally there's a little bit of Amerindian admixture but that's it. The people in the US who are significantly mixed are spics and niggers. Our niggers generally have about 20% white ancestry.

lel, you know what a bunch of loudmouths will say. The real answer is that Southern Europeans are fine. You lot are swarthier than we are. That said, I don't see why too many LARPers (who probably aren't fair haired and blue eyed themselves) hang up on such ideal notions of exact purity.


No, it's stupid as fuck if 10-20% of men get to have exclusive or near exclusive access to near half of women and a large portion of perfectly fit men have little to no access to mates. The reason Mormons are able to practice it without degenerating into Muslims is because they can exile their excess males into the rest of the US with relatively few problems. Muslims don't have the same luxury without dumping their males on the West as hordes of colonizers, jihadis, or soldiers for human waves in various wars they feel apt to fight.

If you want the whole 'Chad' and /r9k/ phenomenon to become even worse and more entrenched than it already is, permit polygamy.

FUCK OFF WHITE GENOCIDE CUCK

a confederacy style aristocratic republic or kosher democracy?


beyond irrelevant unless that 1/8th was hardcore dravidian in which case it sounds fine anyway by your description


think this is mostly right, if mentally white takes more than physically looking white it can't be that much more and I think it is mostly culture anyways

How convenient for you to make the mother in every single example to be white, and the father a shitskin of different varieties, Anonstein.

CHECK THAT SHIT OUT

lol, you post this white rabbit bullshit you fairy. We've seen this meme 14,880,000 times. No need to see it 6 gorillion more.

Since you're so in love with polygamy, why don't you look at its long-term effects on social stability and breeding patterns?

As a white woman with a white child I can confirm. Old white people are super happy to see baby white people. Occasionally nonwhites will also be super stoked to see my "blonde haired blue eyed angel"

Yes, I'm working on making more. I pray to kek for multiples. (More babies in less time. Also fewer births.)

Anyone?

tfw need to find a woman like you in my area but all the really beautiful dutch women at the market just say they never ever want children or marriage

Don't go for super beauty. Most women who are 8/10, 9/10, or 10/10 are trained to not have kids because then you aren't pretty anymore. Being pretty gets you nice things and social status. And that is completely true. Having babies WRECKS your body.
Find a woman who is not unattractive and your chances of having a huge family is higher.

She also may be saying that because objectively, any woman who wants kids is retarded. Would you want to disfigure your body painfully? Stretch marks that may bleed? Have your kid possibly die? Piss yourself when you sneeze for who knows how many years? Give birth after being in labor for multiple days? Maybe die? Worry about being a single parent? And that is the run of the mill issues. You need to make her biologically want it. A logical woman won't want kids. Make her illogical. It isn't hard. Be stable and able to take care of her. Make it so she doesn't have to work when she gets pregnant if she is too sick.

Man fuck all of that, I'm just going to use my mentalism techniques on them, it's a shame I've had to study this for years and I have to manipulate them subtlely but it's the only way.

Oh and btw I can't really provide for one, I still live in my parents home, thanks to my parents fucking me over.

but women often reproduce with males that are far worse and far less able to provide fuck all

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlnews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniWikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/2WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmludio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/201WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmls-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.html-audio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlio-recording-release.html

WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/201WikiLeaks Releases Hacked Audio of DNC Voicemails! Anonymous 07/28/16 (Thu) 01:36:30 240d2b No.6925181
After releasing nearly 20,000 emails from the US Democratic National Committee, WikiLeaks has dumped audio recordings from the organization.
The new release includes 29 voice messages pulled from the emails of high-ranking DNC officials, totaling 14 minutes.
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?file=mp3&count=50#searchresult
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
None of the messages listened to by The Washington Times contained anything immediately obvious as embarrassing or incriminating.
However, the very fact the DNC voicemail system has been hacked is embarrassing and could augur the release of far more damaging material later.
The majority of the messages, several of the speakers of which address themselves to “Andrew,” are mostly pro-forma lasting a few seconds, and indicating only that the person has called and wants “Andrew” to call back.
Several concern matters of scheduling, for ambassador dinners, White House St. Patrick’s Day events, DNC gatherings and the Philadelphia convention. One caller asks about the best way to contact first lady Michelle Obama, and another asks “Andrew” for an unspecified favor.
A few calls are in the “unsolicited angry voter” genre, which politicians and journalists get by the bushel and are powerless over. However, they might now play as strange given the WikiLeaks released emails showing the DNC was trying to tilt the race toward Hillary Clinton.
“I am furious at what you’re doing with Bernie Sanders. He is having far too much influence,” says one of the longer callers, who identifies herself as a woman on a fixed income who donated to Hillary Clinton.
archive.is/62scr
archive.is/XlL1Q
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails/
sputniknews.com/us/20160728/1043695928/wikileaks-audio-recording-release.htmlo-recording-release.html

Stop dumping cuckold porn wtf.

I'm gonna fucking kill whoever programmed this thing. Luckily the hide feature works.

fuck off schlomo

Your parents fucked you over, yet gave you a place to live? Did they narc on you and give you a felony? Make it nearly impossible to get a job and start adulting?

This. When will they learn that repeating digits cannot be forced? Well, some fervent acolytes of Kek can, and I've seen it, but this sure as hell doesn't apply to the average dumb shill around here

Bullshit. Cite a source, one good source.


What do you know about Cushitic or Arabic music? Don't answer: nothing.

I hope you don't have a plan to drop the IQ of the white race below room temperature.

Look after her you faggot.

...

Jews are inbred with very high IQ. Racemixing will drop the IQ below room temperature though.

You know, these threads just show how in times like summer, we get waves of Holla Forumsacks wannabes who have this metric in their minds to identify whites and either don't fully share it and just preach on how they will exterminate anyone who does not fit their vision of a white person or their system is incredibly simple to the point that it's just about how you look, one wrong trait and you're it, same with the kind of kiddies that whenever they see a slightly big nose they scream out JEW without doing a background trace.


If at least 50% of you are serious on this then I want to see an unified system, but because I know most of you are either shills and/or in for the summer only, then what's the point, just let this thread die.

This is how a CIA / expert-in-persuasion thread looks like.
Is the main point, it makes you think there is a limit to biological races but it makes you accept this premise subconsciously.
Is the plausible deniability, trying to fit in, "heh guys I was only asking so I can know how to eliminate niggers and remove kebab".

Confuse the issue bait thread.

Back on Track: Stop flooding the USA/Europe with every other race in the world, and stop Taxing us to pay for their Everything.

1/4 Irish, 1/4 English, 1/4 German.

1/4 Mestizo instantly turned me into a obvious non-white mongrel. I wouldn't wish this on anyone, whites hate me and I don't want to be with mexican nationalist re-conquistador retards.

no one here knows. they all use pre-1930 science. its pathetic

1/4 mestizo isn't a thing retard. how much amerindian, nigger and spanish do you have?