Why so many people here are trying to deny that Christianity is Jewish? Where do you think it fucking comes from...

...

Thin skinned as usual. Then I'm supposed to believe that Christianity will have some sort of huge reformation into a muslims lynching religion when you christkikes can't even acknowledge your own dogmas and faults.

Can't really come up with anything more than browbeating? Kike tricks are becoming awfully stale.

no mr. sandnigger you are not white and all humas on pol hate christians.

no matter if you think you are you will never be.

(checked)

Kek cucks YHWH again.

that's some serious fucking strawmanning.

Even as a non-religious person, I find all the slander of Christianity to be pretty ignorant.

Was Jesus a Jew? Yes. Was Christianity started as a sect of Judaism? Yes, no doubt.

But how much of modern Christianity in any way resembles 1st century Christianity? The dogma was primarily developed by the Romans, and traditionally Christian society was largely developed on the back of Greek philosophy. Even the ridiculous magical aspect of Christian beliefs has had a primary focus on the inclusion of beliefs from conquered/converted peoples, along with the New Testament that is very far from Jewish in tone.
And, of course, Judaism was developing during those millennia as well. The Talmudic Judaism of today would be nearly unrecognizable to a Jew from the time of Jesus.

Many centuries of development, debate, and differing ethnic/cultural influence have made Christianity and Judaism vastly different.

Modern Christianity is not a Jewish religion. I still think it's wrong and foolish for a modern man to partake in, but it's not Jewish.

It's Jewish in the sense that we're supposed to take the word of some water-deprived hashish smoking goat fuckers that they observed miracles when nowadays we wouldn't even give these people the benefit of a quick death had we the opportunity to do so. It's a stunning hypocrisy.

Only the OT is Jewish. The NT was about a Jew who respected gentiles and was killed by conspiring Jews.

Standard d&c attempt.
We can argue or fight over religion after the kikes and shitskins are taken care of.

Christianity is GOYED not jewish

We get it christkike, you can't handle criticism. Go to your hugbox board if you can't take it.

Just like you can't take mild criticism about your poor attempt at D/C. Here's your shekel.

christians will tell you thats not true.

at this point i will say: i dont care if he was shitskin or white, jew or judean.
middle east is middle east and christians are cucks for accpeting a religion made intially for kikes.

christians are the same as leftists. in fact they are the left wing of 2000 years back when they tries to establish their own christians rule by challanging the old non-christians elite.

CHRISTIANITY = LEFT
CHRISTIANITY = NIGGERS ARE SAME AS WHITE PEOPL - AS GOD "LOVES" ALL PEOPLE NO MATTER WHAT COLOR

christains always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc
muslims always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc
jews always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc

one and the same shit.

lmao no wonder you lost the culture war

I'm an atheist.
But thanks for showing more of your standard attack suite.
Three ad hominems in one line, including "you're an SJW" out-grouping innuendo.
Sure is "alt-right" in here, you make this way too easy.

Oh I'm sure.

Christianity is the foundation of Western culture, morality, and values. Talmud hates Christ, Jews hate Christ.

Jesus called Jews sons of the devil, serpents, vipers, liars, antichrists, and enemies of the Gospel.

If you despise the great Christianity, you're not truly redpilled. End of story.

I'm only going to (1) this thread

I cry erry tiem.

if you are an atheist then please prove us you knowledge about christianity!

go show us you know what you are talking about by protecting a jew bum on a stick:

Definitely, Christianity is a cuck religion full of all types of problems, along with the good it brought to our history as well. But Christianity was not made for kikes. It was initially made in response to kikes, and even that aspect is not a primary aspect anymore. It was developed as a European religion, and has that tone in every facet of it today. It's a shitty religion, but it is the shit of Europe, not of Israel. And again, largely what people stand against today are Ashkenazi Talmudic bullshit when they are hating on Jews, and that culture has nothing to do with Jesus.

Sure, point to the post where I "protected a Jew on a stick" and I'll clarify what I meant, because I don't recall defending either side.

Not sure about this.

Was never implied.

Reported.
You sure as fuck don’t know.
Reported.
Wow.
Reported.
Reported.
Reported.

We all lived in sub-Saharan African conditions before Christians came along.

Remember to report all intl threads.

Christ wasn’t a socialist. He was a religious radical. He advocated charity by the individual. He did not want a complex temporal power structure established to tax people at gunpoint to subsidize poverty.
Santa Claus, likewise, rewards virtue with toys and evil with coal. If anything, what he represents is a purely capitalistic idea–regardless of background, race, creed, etc., by virtuous and diligent behavior one will be rewarded materially. Whereas slothfulness and evil reaps nothing of value.
A Wonderful Life is about valuing family, not about establishing a top-down economy.
A Christmas Carol isn’t about a capitalist who turns into a socialist. It’s about a capitalist who overcomes the bitterness of his childhood and learns to value his family and his friendships more than his business. He doesn’t stop being a capitalist; he still solves all of his problems with money.
The Grinch is about a terrorist who realizes that his diagnosis of capitalist society as being corrupt and materialistic was wrong. He realizes that though the society acknowledges capitalistic values, it also has a spiritual core independent of that system. His realization that the two can exist in harmony allows him to come to terms with his own bitterness and join society, rather than living like a hermit up in the mountains.
Charlie Brown, ironically, is the only story with any socialist values at all, and they’re negative. Charlie Brown used everyone’s money to make a terrible economic decision and invest in a bad tree that didn’t fulfill its intended function. The people were then forced to band together to make the best out of this smoking ruin on their own initiative. In essence, A Charlie Brown Christmas is about a government using the people’s money poorly, and then the public sector having to make the best of it with their own innovation.

Remember to report all intl threads.

I find it ironic that people believe Christians can’t come to Holla Forums because it “violates their faith.”
I’m not saying this in a “they are coming here to fish for sinners” kind of way. I’m saying it in a “maybe God wants us here” kind of way. Think about the things promoted on Holla Forums. Really think about them. We stand for strong family and strong fathers. We stand for logic and reason. We demand the utmost skill in conveying ideas. We promote freedom and free speech.
We get a lot of flak for hating the Jews, blacks, and women. Anyone who has been on here more than a week knows that we don’t actually hate those people. What we hate is what they do and what they stand for.
The Jew stands for greed and gluttony.
The black stands for sloth and ignorance.
The feminist stands for lust and oppression.
We hate the idea of our children being influence by insanity, laziness, and greed. This is a statement that the outside world will never understand: Holla Forums is a bastion of moral superiority. In our anonymous and uncensored little world, we let flow our stark moral standards. That is why the world hates us. Not because we are immoral, but because we stand on a moral high ground so traditional that the cesspool of society cannot see it for what it is.

Remember to report all intl threads.

The Bible teaches that those who clothe themselves in Christ are “born again, to a new heritage,” that is the “oldest heritage.” Christians, no matter the color of their skin or the face of their father, are sons and daughters of Abraham.
All a man has in this world is what he was given by his parents. They may not leave him wealth, fame, or a place in society. What they do leave him is the culture of his people, the blood in his veins, and the morals and ethics of their own fathers. As the Old Testament taught, some men were stained from birth because of this. They were unclean, just as there was food that was unclean.
But God says that there is another way–a better way. A man need not be bound by the lot that has befallen them. In the New Testament, Peter writes a letter in response to some Jews who do not understand the commandment to accept Gentiles as their own. It conflicted with their teachings, and they were refusing to accept them as equals. “We are the Chosen ones,” they argued, not them. In it, Peter berates them and tells them that the spiritual inheritance given by God supersedes the inheritance of the earthly father. Every man who accepts Jesus Christ as his savior becomes one of the Chosen. I will say it again, because it is important: Every man who accepts Jesus Christ as his savior becomes one of the Chosen.
If you accept Jesus Christ into your heart, you are born again to the line of Abraham and will be given a heritage greater and older than any earthly bloodline. You will inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. It becomes your birthright, and you will dwell there eternally. You become a Son or Daughter of God.
Peter based his argument off of a vision he had, detailed in Acts 10, in which God laid out food before him and commanded him to eat. But Peter saw that the food was unclean, and so he refused. God then said this to him.
What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. (verse 15)
Later, Peter realized that this was not just a revelation about food, but about man himself. When Christ died, he came to cleanse man of the Original Sin. Thus his revelation.
God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. (verse 28)
This vision shows something very important. Why do the Jews believe that the Gentile is bad? Because he is “unclean”. What did God show to Peter? That the sacrifice of Christ has “cleansed the unclean”. There is no food now that cannot be eaten. There is no man now who is a Gentile. Not only food, but man himself has been cleansed. There are no unclean races. Not anymore. The only man who is unclean is the man who has not accepted Christ into his heart and become one of the Chosen. The only man who is clean is the man who has clothed himself in Christ; he is a Son of God and shall inherit the Kingdom of Heaven.
In the leftists’ fumbling and bumbling, they scream about the color of someone’s skin as though that is the definitive qualifier for race. Their ignorance betrays you. Holla Forums argues that Zimmerman, in spite of being Hispanic, is an “honorary white” for what he did. Why? Because they understand that what a man is born is not as important as what he grows up to become. They know that there is more to a man than the mere quality of his blood or the shade of his skin–that this alone is not the ruler of everything he is, was, and will become.
Zimmerman is a Christian. He has clothed himself in Christ. He is a Son of Abraham and will dwell in the House of the Lord. Whatever earthly heritage he bore has been overwritten and superseded by a spiritual one. Zimmerman is one of the Chosen. Why? Because God does not care about the flesh. “Build up not your wealth on Earth, for it will rot and decay. Build up your treasure in the Kingdom of Heaven, for it is eternal.” At the end of all things and the beginning of eternity, there will be no more flesh and all will be judged based on their choices and character.

Remember to report all intl threads.

That is the revelation of God, the revelation of Christianity, and the revelation of Jesus. That salvation is no longer a birthright, but a choice. You were born flawed. God has the highest standards and all fall short of them, no matter the color of their skin. Were some more clean than others? Yes. But none were clean enough. But because He loves us, He has cleared away the debt of Original Sin. He has cast aside the earthly inheritance, and He has allowed any man who so chooses to rise above his earthy blood and become a spiritual heir to the Kingdom of Heaven itself.
No longer must you be of the blood to be Chosen. Now a man may become Chosen though Christ, and only through Christ.
Holla Forums will tell you that race is a matter of trends (meaning genetics), not individuals. My addition to that statement is this: the revelation of Christ is a personal revelation. It is an individual revelation. A whole race cannot be excused, an entire culture or people cannot be forgiven. You must have the wherewithal to come to God, prostrate yourself, admitting your flaws and failings and seeking forgiveness for your transgressions. You can only do it alone. No one can drag you to it. You cannot be converted by the sword, as a Muslim can. You are not born inferior, like the Jew would tell you. You must come to the revelation on your own. You are made Chosen by your own hands, by the Grace of God. You choose yourself, and because of that, God chooses you.
Race is about trends, not individuals. So is damnation. There is no Christian who is not an individual over the trend. More people will fall than will rise. Many who are of good stock will fall because they could not raise themselves up to be better. Do not glorify the slaggard, wastrel, layabout, or the parasite simply because of his “good brewing”. They are degenerates, unable to so much as raise a hand to meet the face of God that has come down from such purity to meet them halfway.
They are not the Chosen because they lack the willingness to apply themselves to the path of salvation–a path made so simple that it comprises but a single step.
To believe otherwise–to glorify them because of their blood–is to behave as the Jews behave and to believe as the Jews believe. That is the true betrayal of leftist intention. That they parrot the beliefs of the Jews with only a few words changed. That they speak but do not hear. That they recite but do not understand.
You scream “kike on a stick” and “christcuck” without comprehending the root terms. Holla Forums is against miscegenation for excellent reasons. Holla Forums is against multiculturalism for excellent reasons. Above everything else, Holla Forums is a overwhelmingly nationalist. If every Jew that pushed orthodox Judaism went to live in Israel and the only jews outside of it were those who disliked or who were not “jew-ish” in spite of being jews, and did not push any jewish interests or assert zionism, would anyone have a problem with them? “Every man in his country.” Zionists are Jewish nationalists, so why not leave them to their own nation? There would be those that criticized them for how they obtained their city-state. I would be among them, for as a Christian, I know that the covenant of the Old Testament was dissolved, so the Jews had no right to the land they took.
They stole it, in other words.
On the whole, however, there would be far less animosity against them. If Africans stayed in Africa and lived or died by their own laws, there would be far less said about them. If mussulmen laid down their swords and picked up plowshares to repair their waitron land, far fewer people would hate them. If cultures did not try to devour one another and races to subsume one another–instead leaving each other well enough alone with mutually respected boundaries–the world would be a far better place than it is today.

:^)))))))))

Remember to report all intl threads.

But the Jew is not content with his own nation. He will take what he sees as his… and then take and take and take some more from everyone else. And that is why he cannot be tolerated. Because he will not stay behind the walls he has raised and foster his own people. Because he feels he must destroy and subjugate the world.
This is the truth of the world that Holla Forums has realized, of which Christians have always been aware. The truth is that we did not start this. Ours is not an instigation, but a reaction. That is what liberals, Jews, mussulmen, what have you, refuse to admit, and it is the truth that they fear the most. Their enemies, whom they hate so deeply, once did not call any man an enemy and would call a stranger a friend. That it is those who the left protects and idolizes who started the fires–who pushed out the good things in this world for their own ego and profit.
That is the truth of the world. We did not start the fire. The Crusades were justified and reactionary to centuries of Muslim conquest, slavery, and genocide. The Inquisition was justified and reactionary to Muslim taqiyya and the Muslim invasion and conquest of Iberia. Questioning the story of the Holocaust is justified, as all things should be questioned under the eye of rationality, even God.
This is the truth that the left fears most: that we have been right all along. And they fear it because of their ego. Because their pride is too great for them to concede to having been wrong, about anything, ever.
Pride has been the assassin of empires and nations. It has burned continents and ravaged civilizations. Pride, it is said, will be the one sin that drags the most to Hell. Pride so great that you cannot bring yourself to take the holy hand that has been extended to you. Pride so heavy and immense that you cannot bring yourself to grab the rope that has been thrown to you as you drown. Even though you hold the views you do through no fault of your own, your pride still stays your hand from that rope. And it will be that pride, in the end, that will be your undoing.
That is why you are not worthy. That is why you are not Chosen. In the end, every knee will bow. Those that will not bow will be bent. Even that of the Antichrist.
Liberals try so hard to divide and conquer. Do they never stop to think why they are compelled to do so? Do they never cease and wonder at why things such as as Nationalism and Christianity–which seek only be left alone–drive them to such heights of rage?
It is because the mere existence of something that is not of theirs is a suggestion that they might have been wrong. Their pride demands their rage at these things. And they give in to that demand.
And so the wheel turns and the fire rises. Stand for truth in a world of lies. Stand for purity in a world of corruption. Stand for chastity in a world of degeneracy.
DEUS VULT.

sage

Holla Forums really has very little to do with being "politically incorrect" nowadays. Just political.

Bullshit. Look at the Greeks at their height before Christianity. Look at the Romans before Jesus.

Christianity had a lot to do with spreading civilization throughout Europe, but many people had long left Sub-Saharan style nonsense behind for many centuries before Christianity.

Cognitive dissonance is very painful user.
That's why they deny it.
Solution: deny the second part.

Reported for intl.

SILL POST

you took the shit pill - you are shit pilled

greek empire existed BEFORE christianity
roman empire excited BEFORE chrsitanity.

romans even had advanced mathematicians!
thats how they constructed all that fancy buildings while everyone else in the world was still using leaves as wood for housing.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Remember to report all intl threads.

There is no shortage of heresies these days.
If you want to adopt some blasphemous, perverted, fun house mirror reflection of Christianity, you will find a veritable buffet of options. You can sift through all the variants and build your own little pet version of the Faith. It’s Ice Cream Social Christianity: make your own sundae! (Or Sunday, as it were)
And of all the heretical choices, probably the most common–and possibly the most damaging–is what I’ve come to call the Nice Doctrine.
The propagators of the Nice Doctrine can be seen and heard from anytime any Christian takes any “bold” stance on any cultural issue, uses “harsh” language of any kind, condemns any sinful act, or fights against evil with any force or conviction at all. As soon as you stand and say, “This is wrong. and I will not compromise,” the heretics swoop in with their trusty mantras.
They insist that Jesus was a nice man and that He never would have done anything to upset people. They say that He came down from Heaven to preach tolerance and acceptance and He wouldn’t have used words that might lead to hurt feelings. They confidently sermonize about a meek and mild Messiah who was born into this Earthly realm on a mission to spark a constructive dialogue. The believers in Nice Jesus are usually ignorant of Scripture, but they do know that He was ‘friends with prostitutes’ and once said something about how, like, we shouldn’t get too ticked off about stuff, or whatever. In their minds. He’s essentially a supernatural Cheech Marin.
Replies to my earlier statements about gay rights militants illustrate this heresy. That post prompted an especially noteworthy email from someone concerned that I’m not being “Christlike” because I “call people names.” He said, in part, “You aren’t spreading Christianity when you talk like that. The whole message of Jesus was that we should be nice to people because we want them to be nice to us. That’s how we can all be happy. Period. It’s that simple.”
Be nice to me, I’ll be nice to you, and we’ll all be happy. This is the ‘whole message’ of Christianity? Really?
Jesus Christ preached a Truth no deeper or more complex than a slogan on a poster in a kindergarten classroom? Really? A provocative claim, to say the least. I decided to investigate the matter, and sure enough, I found this excerpt from the Sermon on the Mount: “We’re best friends like friends should be. With a great big hug, and a kiss from me to you, won’t you say you love me too?”
Actually, wait, sorry, that’s from the original Barney theme song. God help us. We’ve turned the Son of God into a purple dinosaur puppet. There’s no way to be certain, but most theologians believe that despite popular perception, Christ looked nothing like this. I don’t recognize this Jesus. This moderate. This pacifist. This nice guy. He’s not the Jesus I read about in the Bible.
I read of a strong, manly, stern, and bold Savior. Compassionate, yes. Forgiving, of course. Loving, always loving. But not particularly nice. He condemned. He denounced. He caused trouble. He disrupted the established order. On one occasion–or at least one recorded occasion–He used violence. This Jesus saw the money changers in the temple and how did He respond? He wasn’t polite about it. I’d even say He was downright intolerant. He fashioned a whip (this is what the lawyers would call ‘premeditation’) and physically drove the merchants away. He turned over tables and shouted. He caused a scene. (John 2:15)
Assault with a deadly weapon. Vandalism. Disturbing the peace. Worse still, intolerance. In two words: not nice. Not nice at all.

Remember to report all intl threads.

Can you imagine how some moderate, pious, nice “Christians” of today would react to that spectacle in the Temple? Can you envision the proponents of the Nice Doctrine, with their wagging fingers and their passive aggressive sighs? I'm sure they’d send Jesus a patronizing e-mail, perhaps leave a disapproving comment under the news article about the incident reminding Jesus that Jesus would never do what Jesus just did.
Personally. I’ve studied the New Testament and found not a single instance of Christ calling for a ‘dialogue’ with evil or seeking the middle ground on an issue. I see an absolutist, unafraid of confrontation. I see a man who did not waver or give credence to the other side. I see someone who never once avoided a dispute by saying that He’ll just ‘agree to disagree.’ I see a Christ who calls the Scribes and Pharisees snakes and vipers. He labels them murderers and blind guides and ridicules them publicly (Matthew 23:33). He undermines their authority. He insults them. He castigates them. He’s not very nice to them. Jesus rebukes and condemns.
In Matthew 18, He utilizes morbid and violent imagery, saying that it would be better to drown in the sea with a stone around your neck than to harm a child. Had our modern politicians been around two thousand years ago, I’m sure they’d go on the cable news shows and shake their heads and insist that there’s ‘no place for that kind of language.’ No place for the language of God.
Jesus deliberately did and said things that He knew would upset people. He stirred up division and controversy. He provoked. He didn’t have to break from established customs, but He did. He didn’t have to heal that man’s hand on the Sabbath, knowing how it would disturb others and cause them immense irritation, but He did, and He did so with ‘anger’ (Mark 3:5). He could have gone with the flow a little bit. He could have chilled out and let bygones be bygones, but He didn’t. He could have been diplomatic, but He wasn’t.
He could have told everyone to relax, but instead He made them uncomfortable. He could have put them at ease, but He chose to put them on edge.
He convinced the mob not to stone the adulterer (John 8). and you’ll notice that He then turned to her and told her to stop sinning. Indeed, never once did He encounter sin and corruption and say, “Hey, do your thang, homies. Just have fun. YOLO!” The followers of Nice Jesus love to quote the ‘throw the first stone’ verse–and for good reason, as it’s a beautiful and compelling story–but you rarely hear mention of the exchange that occurs just a few sentences later in that very same chapter. In John 8:44, Jesus rebukes unbelieving Jews and calls them ‘sons of the Devil.’
Wow. That wasn’t nice, Jesus. Didn’t anyone ever tell you that you can catch more flies with honey, Jesus? Of course, you’d catch even more flies with a mound of garbage, so maybe ‘catching flies’ isn’t the point. While we’re often reminded that Jesus said, “Live by the sword, die by the sword,” we seem to ignore his other sword references. Like when he told his disciples to sell their cloaks and buy a sword (Luke 22), or when He said that He “didn't come to bring peace, but a sword.” (Matthew 10)
Now, it’s true that He is God and we are not. Jesus can say whatever He wants to say. But we are called to be like Christ, which begs the question: what is Christ like? Well, He is, among other things, uncompromising. He is intolerant of evil. He is disruptive. He is sometimes harsh. He is sometimes impolite. He is sometimes angry. He is always loving. Christ was not and is not a cosmic guidance counselor, and He is not mankind’s best friend, nor did He call us to be. He made dogs for that role–our destiny is more substantial, and our path to it is far more challenging and dangerous. And nice? Where does nice factor into this? Nice: affable, peachy, swell.
Nice has nothing to do with Christianity. I have nothing against nice–nice is nice–but even serial killers can be nice to people. They generally are exceptionally affable, except when they’re murdering. That means they’re nice to, like, 97 or 98% of everyone they meet. I guess they’re following Christ almost all of the time, right?

the joke

stratosphere

your head

Remember to report all intl threads.

And tolerance? Tolerance is easy. Any coward can learn to tolerate something. Tolerance is inaction: intolerance is action. We are called to refuse to tolerate evil. We are called to get angry at it and actively work to destroy it. Who’d have guessed it–anger is far more godly than tolerance ever could be.
Obviously I’m not suggesting that anger is automatically, or even usually, justified. Christ exhibited righteous anger: righteous anger is the sort of anger that naturally fills our soul when we confront the depths of depravity and sin. It is wrong to seethe with rage because someone cut us off in traffic or gossips about us behind our back, but it is also wrong to feel no anger when babies are murdered and the institution of the family is undermined and attacked.
Anger is good when it is directed at things that offend not us, but God. Just as Christ’s intolerance, like the intolerance we’re commanded to have, stems from a desire to save souls and defend Truth.
Even when we have righteous anger, we do not have carte blanche to act on it in any way we please. But according to the Bible, there are times to use strong language, there are times to cause a scene, there are times to hurt people’s feelings, and there are times when we might need to use physical force. Jesus told us to turn the other cheek when we are personally attacked. He never told us to turn our backs entirely and let lies spread and evil grow. So enough with the niceties. Christians in this country sound too similar to the Golden Girls song and not enough like the Battle Hymn of the Republic. There’s too much ‘thank you for being a friend.’ and not enough ‘lightening from His terrible swift sword.’ We’re all hugging and singing Kumbaya when we should be marching and shouting Hallelujah. We’re nice “Christians” with our nice Jesus, and we are trampled on without protest.
Enough, already.
I think it’s time that Christianity regain its fighting spirit–the spirit of Christ. I think it’s time we ask that question, “What would Jesus do?” And I think it’s time we answer it truthfully. Jesus would flip tables and yell. Maybe we ought to follow suit.

Remember to report all intl threads.

I’ll address Luke 6:35. The “love” in “love your enemies” is ἀγαπᾶτε, a conjugate of agape. This is not love like you love your mom–storge–not love like in romance–eros–nor love for a friend–philos. This is loving your enemy like God loves them–agape.
Now, God does not love by making you feel good for doing evil. God does not allow one to sin and not suffer the natural consequences thereof. Christ is saying we should endeavor to reform and rehabilitate our enemies. At first blush, this suggests that leftists are right–that killing them is not the answer. But it is not right to go on letting them kill or enslave young Christian girls to be sold on the sex market, either. Where is your love for our brothers and sisters in Christ? Will you throw them aside for some infidels?
“That which you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me.” Matthew 25:40 So, with a choice between effectively letting someone enslave and rape Jesus or regrettably destroying evildoers that have already determined to use force, I think it is a Christian answer to fight back. However, at the same time, there are already people fighting back and this Oregon guy does not have the means to help in that way. If this guy is called upon to go martyr himself for the faith, he should do it. His sacrifice for spreading the word will do good for Christ. I do not feel that is what God has called me to do, but the Holy Spirit, while the same essence, may call on each of us to use our talents in different ways. To sum up, 6:35 is not a prohibition on fighting to save oneself or other Christians, although it does put in a strong suggestion about trying other methods first. Just like every secular ideology in history.

~:~

I’m going to use a quote from the Bible, to help us better understand what sins are and why things are sins.

Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you. Everyone who sins is a slave to sin.”
John 8:34

I think that Jesus was incredibly insightful on this–the idea that being a sinner makes you a slave to your sins. Taking this idea forward, we can understand that sins are acts that make us slaves to our base drives and impulses that erode our ability to control ourselves and therefore make rational decisions. Even though this is a Biblical idea, you can apply it to examine certain acts and determine if they are sinful without listening to the letter of the law in the Bible itself. If we think about it this way, God didn't just arbitrarily make things sins because he doesn't like them. Sins are sins because they destroy us–because they are self-destructive acts or acts which destroy those who care about and love–which is an abomination to both nature and, if you so believe, God.
Casual sex and pornography are not sins simply because they are offensive to God. They are sins because they manipulate the parts of your mind that are meant to be dedicated to forming stable and healthy sexual partnerships with other people. They are sins because they are habit forming and they destroy your capacity for real love.
Hell, again, exists in more than just the spiritual sense. Look at the life of the true degenerate. Not just someone who occasionally dabbles in degeneracy, but the real diehards. The drunks, the homosexuals, the crack addicts. Are these people living a fulfilling, meaningful life ? Their lives are hell. They don't need to wait to die to go to hell, they're already there.

ROMAN EMPIRE
GREEK EMPIRE

Haha, fair enough. I missed that you were replying to another post, and just addressed it as a literal statement.

Can I get a smug varg pepe? I'm on a new computer and don't have it.

We have IDs here so you can get filtered easily.
Stop roleplaying cuckstianity.
Stop twisting this nonsensical religion into this LARP warrior-knight thing.

This tbh. I'd say only 1 in 10 people have the ability to think rationally. Then 1 among those 10 has the ability to critically look at their life, and rationally update their worldview on a daily basis as new information is internalized.

Those few are Holla Forums, many of whom were either fullblown bluepills or lolbertards or any of the other establishment-accepted political denominations, before they arrived here and allowed themselves to consume new information that freed them.

And now, here, among ourselves, again only the few can critically look at the cancer that are Abrahamic religions (Christianity included), and realize that it's proto-Bolshevist egalitarian bullshit that weakens the race and acts as a 5th column among nations. It was never anything but.

Whites made Christianity great, not the other way around.

I think this is a great point that is not considered nearly enough.

sage

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Not going to get sucked into attacking Christianity, bit the "barbaric European cavemen" myth is just another part of the larger attack against White history (as is constant reference to the Inquisition, which actually was primarily a defensive purge directed at the middle-aged version of anti-monarchy, anti-Christian Bolsheviks.)

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-23286928
archive.is/S6hdm

Agriculture and calendars, 10000 years ago. Incidentally the calendar was recalibrated over the span of millennia, to correct for the Earth's wobble, thus indicating that the society who used it was stable and persistent.
A lot of advancement happened between this era and the introduction of christianity, Northern Europeans were far more advanced than people tend to think.

Anyway, fuck this d&c nonsense.

It's a staple on 8pol. It's just that we're currently being overrun by summerfags and shills.

None of these are contradictory.
Why do White people living by themselves have to hate their enemies?
Turning the other cheek is about regaining dignity.
Nothing's wrong with charity.
The meek, poor in spirit, and persecuted are great: nothing's wrong with them, and they pose no threat to the White race.

Come on, I know at least one of you faggots have it.

I cannot believe that so many people thought I was serious after being absurdly facetious AND explaining my joke in a later post. Read the fucking thread, it's embarassing.

Then why do neither Christians nor Muslims act like Jews?

christains always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc

muslims always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc

jews always try to take over economy, education sytem, media etc

Nice pasta, friend.

Blow your brains out, you cocksucking faggot.

>>>/reddit/

EVERYTHING in this LARP religion is contradictory.
Really? How did that help Caesar? Oh right, it got him assassinated.
Yes goy, give your belongings to other people who will simply demand more and more. Teach them to dread self-sufficiency.
The "meek" are you and other pisstians.

SAGE SLIDE D&C THREADS

Reported for CONFIRMING you’re intl.

Yes user, Christ was an Arab, living in the Arabian Desert.

Pick ne.

see
Filtering takes 5 seconds.

Your point is what, you fucking idiot? Sage the thread.

No one gets more triggered on this board than christians when you criticize them. It's fucking hilarious. Let's laugh as this cuck spams his impotent rage at the possibility that people dare to disagree with his cuckold religion.

You first, kike-lover.

ah, the daily religious d&c thread

Christianity is responsible for all of the altruism and weakness whites display today. You can see on Holla Forums even that the christcucks here think whites and non-whites can live side by side as long as they're all christian. Christianity is inherently globalist, but also sage because we have had too many of these threads lately.

Also,

christians:

pol:

christians:

...

yup, vlad the impaler, richard lionheart, emperor justinian, charles martel, el cid, jan sobieski, michael the brave etc etc

totally altruistic cucks amirite?

I'm a nigger and forgot to sage sheeeeeeeeeeeeiiittt

this. dont forget to sage polacks

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

No, let the newfriends soak it in.

We can have discussions without it being D&C.

Yup. Pic related.

8cuck jewing in progress.

...

Holy fuck you're mad. Keep it up, I'm laughing my ass off!

The new testament predates the old. Jews are basically episode 1 fanboys

Gotta love their failures at trying to salvage their dying slavery.
Christianity always relied on people having a sub 80 IQ and being unable to read or write or think.
Now that they are slowly becoming a minority they desperately try to find allies everywhere but everyone hates them.
When people become redpilled to the jew, they will become redpilled to all his methods too - this includes cuckstianity.

these threads are spammed every day

they're not discussion, just autists repeating >muh jew on a stick lmao

Can you name anyone who hasn't been dead for at least 100 years?

Reminder that this was started by christcucks yourselves.
Ah, but it sucks when others do it doesn't it?

WHY AREN"T YOU AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST YET
archive.is/7laZC

Religion is the Ultimate Red-Pill
archive.is/Xwdz0

Christian General #1; No kekcucks allowed edition
archive.is/MmUk3

GOOD JEWS APPRECIATION THREAD (on >>>/christian/)
archive.is/4Eaqp

Read the caps at:

Once done, get back to me.

(((1)))
hmmmmm its like Im on 4cuck again

It is all idolatry, man made sock puppets to control people with a fantastical story so that they will not organize and legislate good law. The question is: what sock puppets to create ? What will the people fall for ? Horus apparently was the worship of the child-god, who had a father and mother god, together making the royal family god system. You can see this as a form of worship of royalty, where the masses worship their King, Queen and the first born son later to be King. When you take young children in a Monarchy and you ask them about their King, you will not unlikely find that they attach magical qualities of wisdom, knowledge, power and extraordinary righteousness and cleanness to this King and/or Queen.

Within this background in the tribes that Rome had conquered, they fomented many idols. The first style period of Rome was Greek mythology. When Titus conquered Israel, he did what the Romans always do: attempt to take over the local culture by creating a mix of Roman culture with local culture, in such a way that the ultimate power will reside in Rome. They would try to find a blend, so that they could decapitate the enemy tribe and its witches and priests or whatever they had, but not destroy it. This solidified their rule.

The second style period emerged over a period of centuries. Titus conquered Israel, and naturally then claimed to be the messiah, and that the absorption of Israel within the Roman Empire was the final redemption. That implied that Jewish people had nothing more to fight for, except for their Messiah; Titus Flavian. Of course this was a bizarre lie, but that is how Rome works. The power of indoctrination is great, and they simply killed those who rebelled. Since Titus was generally thought of as magical and a god - and so did his later sons who where Emperor, and he had the title messiah (which ofcourse he was not) stolen in Israel, the idolators in the rest of the world came to conflate the godhood with the messiah later, when in fact that is unacceptable under the Torah law (it could even be a crime punishable by death to worship the messia as a god, but I'll have to look it up.)

Wrong post, meant this one:

Vlad the Impaler was not a Christian.
Jesus said, "let the man who has not sinned throw the first rock!"
He is in hell right now (assuming you believe in Christ and in his teachings and in the bible).

I do not think any of this mattered in the rest of the Empire. Titus being the Messiah, and Jesus being the fantasy prophet that had supposedly heralded him ("within this generation you will see the son of man …"), was merely some local trash talk they did for Israel, with probably limited radiation to the rest of the Empire where they did other lies in other areas (but that is my guess). It all destabilized with the fall of the Flavian dynasty, because then the new Emperor-God could no longer claim descendance from Titus (I guess). Then (FWIK) there where several soldier-emperors, and then came the Emperor who created the Jesus system and also created or furthered the feudal system which has done such tremendous damage.

Now the trash talk meant for Israel that the Roman Emperor was the messiah and so on, was remodled to mean that Jesus suddenly became a new thing: a failed messiah. It doesn't matter that something like that doesn't exist, because it is all trash anyway, concocted in Rome. So Jesus became the messiah all of a sudden, and the Roman Emperor now became the viceroy of the messiah who had been given the power by Jesus over everything. This is how idolatry works: they cobble together a sock puppet, and have the sock puppet declare that those operating the sock puppet have all power. The sock-puppet in effect substitutes for an election, and the worship of the sock puppet by the masses essentially absorbs that vote. It is ironic to think that all this is essentially an election system, through a sock puppet, that could actually have democratic legitimacy (although it is all lies of course). Who worships the sock-puppet (Jesus in this case), votes for the god hood of the one operating the sock puppet, being the Roman Emperor. It is all a form of magical reality (as you probably are aware, I'm not necesarily trying to explain how it might work to you, but in general).

It is interesting to see how this old idolatry worked, particularly in the Americans who seem to have a lot of religious fanatics. This is how the poeple used to belief in all kinds of idols, absolutely convinced that every other one of them was a counter-fit … but of course ! Only their daddy knew the truth, because daddy knows everything and he told them ! Why can't they all see it ?! it's so childish, it's laughable. But there they are, doing their "magical rituals" to change the world … praying to their idol, sitting on their hands otherwise, just as the Emperor would love his enemies do. These people are effectively neutralized for the real struggle. They stand down, waiting for magic man.

EVERT THREAD IS A D&C THREAD
seriously why are people still taking this bait?

Hence on the deepest levels: Jesus is Horus, but the reverse is just as true. Kermit the frog is another one, although he is a less powerful idol then Jesus at the moment. These are all stories for children. I don't think they will get out of it soon, however there is some chance they will realize their mistake once Israel is redeemed.

In this regard is it interesting how they always refer to 'Scriptures,' and they think that has authority in a religious sense. It actually doesn't have much authority: the Torah is first, then the prophets who are directly an outflow of the law on Prophets in the Torah. The so-called "writings" or "scriptures" are quite 3rd rate, and although they are - let's say - fun and interesting (nice psalms and sayings and so on, Daniel belongs here too) it is not that high up in authority in the system at all. It is in effect, cultural fluff that supports the prophets and Torah in a wider sense. It has been added, but you can snap it off quite easily; although I'm not sure you can snap off the psalms that David wrote, because prophets have related that the God of Israel commended David for his work. Still you can see exactly how this becomes third rate: Torah -> prophets -> David.

Then of course that is still a lie, because the so-called gospels are not even third rate, they are trash rate. They are lies by the mobsters of Rome. But they just can't stop with it, they are posessed by idolatry, probably for the rest of their lives. Idolatry still comes in shades though, with Catholicism being the worst; total cretinism. Protestantism is much better, and it's interesting to see these Jesus fans idolators saying things like "no church, only personal 'relationship'". That has a great historical parallel in the 1566 era rebellion, which in centuries before started just like that ! It is a pulling back in to the person to find a morality, while still keeping to the idols. This is what happened back then, eventully leading to a rebellion against Rome and a much improved condition in society, where there was something of a real vote for more people again.

You can even see here an expression of a Torah law, because it says: you do not need to go into heaven or accross the sea, to read the law. You can read it yourself, it is clear and obvious (as indeed it is). The power of the moral decision is pulled into the person itself, away from outside persons and cliques, including the Vatican gangster system. That then develops over time, and eventually it comes out as a form of morality that is founded in people their own selves and determination, which then lead to the American Republic among other things (the Americans following other nations their example, which in their current state of arrogance they usually seem to deny these days).

Hence I'd have to say that … although they are idolators, they seem to be on a better track with it then some others. Still it is surprising to see them controlled by all of this in the current age with so much information available, and no mass murdering Jesus fan who will kill you for not bowing down to the Devil Jesus. Jesus as an idol harmonizes on the core issues with the snake in the garden of eden story, by the way. It is also a promotion of human sacrifice and cannibalism - which are the most primitive forms of religion on Earth. The cross is a death threat to anyone who dares rebel the Empire. The whole "religion" is evil to the core, yet they don't want to see it … daddy told them it was all good, and mommy encouraged them to belief. All the way back from father to son, until the first generation that was conquered by Rome and forced on pain of death to comply.

shhh the israelis were the real aryans. rabbi yeshua was a blond blue eyed nord from the british isles.

like clockwork

Do a search for 'Ceasars Messiah' on youtube.

postflaviana.org/introduction-flavian-origins-theory-christianity/
That article says that the Jesus fraud system was primarily targeted at hellenized Jewish people as well as those general idolators who may have been a target of Jewish conversion (to bring them back under Rome.) That would be the reverse of what I hypothesized in the above, that mainly Israel was the target.

Another interesting thing about all this, is that the so-called "early church" where - according to Caesars Messiah - actual Jewish loyalists (or semi-loyalists, if they had been truely loyal to the Torah they would have won) who fought against Rome, for a real top Jewish general, who where tortured to death in Rome. The cynicism of all this is mind boggeling. The western idolator and by Rome dominated masses have for centuries upon centuries believed that they where the targeted people - or that they are their cultural heirs - who where massacred in Rome in the circus as the early church. In fact those people then died fighting against the Roman Empire, including the absurd Jesus fraud system it later morphed itself in to. They flipped that around, that martyrdom of those people, and used it for the same Empire that tortured those people to death. In other words: there is no early church, the Jesus trash system never was good, ever.

The demonic nature of the Jesus fraud system is breath taking. It is a disgusting and vile creed with a sordid history, just below its pretentious surface. That pretentious surface of doing good and charity is of course still important and would differentiate it from open criminality or Satanism, but if you look what goes under it you can start seeing that as the bait.

catholicherald.co.uk/news/2016/07/19/us-catholics-split-on-whether-to-vote-clinton-or-trump-research-finds/
archive.is/lsksG
looks like the catholicucks are at it again
darn evangelicucks are back to their old tricks
the Jewish-Marxist lies have no effect on muh freethinkers, see?

Who's the cancer now?

So why doesn't the pope just let Christians look at this hidden text he has showing parts of the missing books? What is he trying to hide?

That always cracks me up. Burgers and their renditions of Jeebus are the most egregious examples.

>archive.is/7laZC
>archive.is/Xwdz0
>archive.is/MmUk3
>archive.is/4Eaqp (on >>>/christian/)

thank you for archiving that
threads like that prove that christains imminently need to be eliminated physically

Who cares what the whites are doing when the spic Catholics out number them almost 5 to 1

Why the fuck is this thread on Holla Forums?

Go back to >>>/christian/ and don't come back

Interesting read. Thanks, user.

Holla Forums pls

Well, yeah, but we were talking about Christianity and White people in this thread.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

Reported for intl.

The Vatican’s Jewish ownership.

It’s intl, you fucking retard.

...

Never did I say that Schlomo. I like how you're just waiting to be wounded though.

Yes, let's not discuss it. At all.

This board is predominantly NatSoc, friend. Take your kike-love, and follow your masters…
>>>/oven/

My sides.

Are you christcucks genuinely this anti-self-aware?

Just kidding, you fit the profile of Red Ice Radio"alt-right" d&c monger much better.

The thing with you people is that you over-apply the "alt-right" buzzwords in an attempt to fit in, which only makes you stand out more. It's like you all have a list of words to use for guaranteed camouflage, along with a painfully repetitive bundle of shill tactics used to deal with anyone who opposes you.
True enough, it can be hard to differentiate between an "alt-right" troublemaker and a teenage troll, they both have that "I am on Ritalin" overabundance of nervous energy and a fixation with playground-tier insults and "I will make you get rejected by the gang" out-grouping slurs.
And the addiction to red text is a major flag.

These "alt-right" people are highly active on Holla Forums, so look out for the signature language style, choice of attack strategies, d&c topics and "what do you guys think of this video that I randomly stumbled across?" Self-promotion.

Discussing proto-Bolshevistic kike mind-viruses isn't D&C. Fuck off.

This isn't 4chan you worthless faggot. Go post your bait over there.

Well said.
t. Christian

So you listen to RIR so much that you know their linguistic style perfectly and can distinguish it on an anonymous image board?
Seems like you're alt-right to me.

You need to lurk more or go back to RIR forums if you think kike is a non-Holla Forums word.

Mighty strong confirmation bias you have going on there. Might wanna see a shrink for that. I would cum on Lana's tits but other than that Red Ice sucks dick. It's hilarious that you're so assmad that you completely missed my intensely obvious sarcasm with that Africa comment. I think reddit would be a better place for you cupcake.

Says who the OP has no mention of whites just Christians? I don't really care what whites are doing in a group they are such a minority in, that's just like saying Christianity was what made Europe successful when South America has even more Christians but is a pure shithole. Race is all that matters religion is irreverent and only holds you back by giving you a fake master-status.

19.

Fuck, forgot to sage.

Reported for intl.

Remember to sage.

Good for you.

;)

Reported for intl.

All of it.
All christians did back then was talk a lot about their rights, about minority rights, about how everyone who disagrees with them is a sinner and impure and…that's it actually.
Their only accomplishment back then was martyrdom, which they accepted like the fanatical, brainwashed, irrational cucks that they are (and were).
Once the Roman Empire collapsed, they built "the Church" to extort money from the poor - just like jews.

Keep solving those captchas ;)

please kill yourself

Why are you spamming this thread and why are you reporting everyone for intl?

You don't seem honest.

I'm at 11. Meanwhile, you're at 21.

Christ on a stick, how fucking angry are you?

And why is he doing this in the middle of a weekday afternoon you may ask?
NEETS FOR JESUS

...

You've never seen the christian spergs on here? They're a fucking treat. I've been in some threads where they went ~(450). I just remade the thread right after and he went ~(100) in that one before he passed out probably. He spent 8 hours spamming, jej.

YOU’RE NOT ON 4CUCK, FAGGOT.

87.

Reported for intl.

what're you doing lad

Probably has something to do with the jews killing Jesus, OP.

If you don’t refresh the page, it’s impossible to tell it’s bump locked.

Glad we won, though.

...

And?

have three days passed already?
is it time again for another Christianity is Jewish thread?

What is up with you jews trying to convince people you are Israel? You have never been one of the tribes of Israel and you never will be.
Just because you took their home land does not make you the real Israel just like when the muslims held it didn't make them Israel.

Jews are mostly of Turkish origins who at one time met the tribe of Judah and took their religion and partial name.

-you call yourselves jews, not Judah or Judeans
-you claim birthright from your mothers, not fathers who Israel claims from
-Israel is 12 tribes not one
-you speak yiddish, not Hebrew or any other Israeli language
-you follow ancient condemned books like the talmud and ignore all the scripture of ancient Israel
-you are the synagogue of satan and him you serve

the point of the "Christianity is jewish" is twofold
1st it gives jews some sort of credibility so people believe they are Israel…even though they hate Christians
2nd it associates Christians with evil so that people reject Christ and persecute his followers

I usually ignore cuckstianity threads, they're mostly shitfests.

Gotta jew fast, amirite?

You already lost.

It’s intl. We know it’s intl. Just report and move on.

Step it up, shillpai.

nice, glad to see this getting bumplocked

mods are learning
daily religious d&c spam threads are extremely tiresome

So you've just been pretending to report? Have you been pretending to be a retard too?

Whatever you want to believe, intl.

No, they’re not. We have ONE good mod. The rest are known paid shills.

Yes, someone posted something politically incorrect on Holla Forums. Shut it down!

I wonder why mods bumplock threads when there is only one guy shilling the thread.

I mean, all of your 27 posts (you're the one that posted the most) were about reporting everyone and not having actual debate.

You're only feeding the D&C at this point.

You act like its something new Christcucks are mods its been really obvious for a while.

I thought you were just trolling or shitposting, but you seem really triggered by all this.

How is it D&C to state that worshipping a literal jew is contrary to White interests? No matter how you frame it, Christianity is anti-White. It's a foreign religion. Whites made Christianity great, not the other way around. If you want a more indepth explanation, read the caps here:

You can't claim shilling if you're not willing to offer cogent counter-arguments. If you try, then it's just censorship, which is anathema to the culture of this board.

was bumplocked! guys archive thread for future because moderation is cucked. there is a thread about how good and beneficial christianity is and it not bumplocked after over 700 replies

+1 shekel

How is it D&C to state that worshipping a literal jew is contrary to White interests? No matter how you frame it, Christianity is anti-White. It's a foreign religion. Whites made Christianity great, not the other way around. If you want a more indepth explanation, read the caps here: (You)

You can't claim shilling if you're not willing to offer cogent counter-arguments. If you try, then it's just censorship, which is anathema to the culture of this board.

Meant for:

I'm not a mod I do it for free.

+1 shekel

Enjoy hell

Nah, not feeding it. Containing it.

Reported for intl.

Of course it's Jewish. The real question is why would we find some small annoying Mediterranean ethnic group so important?

Here's why:
openlibrary.org/books/OL111793M/The_Jewish_manumission_inscriptions_of_the_Bosporus_Kingdom
forums.totalwar.org/vb/archive/index.php/t-110582.html

In short, slaves manumitted by Jewish slave traders
[ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedman ]
in the
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosporan_Kingdom
were obliged to attend services in the local Synagogue.
books.google.com/books?id=HoRcVtp49LEC&pg=PA148&lpg=PA148&dq=freedman service jews bosporan&source=bl&ots=rUv6TkxeCa&sig=iMaG7R0aJAj0QuUsOziCGhrMZrc&hl=da&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9-pnrpoXOAhUrD5oKHZgDD3AQ6AEIOzAE#v=onepage&q=freedman service jews bosporan&f=false

Tick tock

Life in our kike-infested West *is* Hell, my rabbi-fellating friend. At least Lucifer's place would have interesting aesthetics, instead of miles of commie blocks.

;^)

All the people who actually waste their days arguing in these religious threads, whether you're Christian, Pagan or whatever, should just be put out of their misery. In the end, none of you are going to do jack shit to the other. Both of you cucks talk the talk but don't walk the walk.
No Christians, you're not going to Crusade and kill off all the Jews and Muslims and ban heresy, you're just going to shitpost on 8/pol/ and scream DEUS VULT!
No Pagans, you're not going to revive your Pagan ancestors and kill all the Christians and reclaim Europa. You're just going to shitpost on 8/pol/ and scream FOR VALHALLA!
TL;DR, both off you kill yourselves

Hell is a bigger unsubstantiated myth then the holocaust.

God, how did we end up here?

Remember when we talked about Christian theology and spiritual world in general?
Remember how pagans were respectful towards the monotheists, and vice versa?
Remember how we used to talk about crusading, and the user actually got apprehend in Turkey for wanting to fight for Christians in Syria?

The Second exodus destroyed the culture of the board, and we've been living in its ruins, pretending that everything is fine.

I just want varg smug pepe, anyone here has it?

I've been on chans for >10 years. Christianity was always heavily, hotly debated on the political boards. Pretending otherwise betrays your supposed 'oldfag' cred.

The Christians declared open war on all our nations.

Our real life is spent dwelling among the ruins of the West, and our virtual one the ruins of 8pol. Truly, we are cursed.

a pet theory of mine is that we were all high-ranking NatSocs in Hitler's Germany, and each of us personally gassed over a thousand jews, which triggered their SkyFairy Desert God so hard he reincarnated us in the Berenstain universe owned by kikes

No. I smell you fucks at hundreds of miles.

Jewish shills and their D&C destroys everything.

The holocaust never happened. We did nothing wrong.

How long ago was this? Was this before 8/pol/

Google Images you newfag

Never change Holla Forums, never change

Anyone who was responsible for letting the refugees in has European blood on their hands, Christian or not.

No, they are a mix of them.

Genetics says they're Jews.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Genetic_origins
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Jews

No.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
The Khazar state lived off slavery. Export of blondes to muslims. Vikings were pimps.

the reasonable thing to do if surrounded by saliens and paternity test
was
the Ashkhenazi, trading north of the
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosporan_Kingdom
picked up a dialect of
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_High_German
from the
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastarnae
and made it into
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yiddish

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbinic_Judaism
became necessary after the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem
Slave traders hate slaves (cf. US south vs nigers)
garden variety racism

I don't fucking care if you're Christian or a Pagan, Both of the sides in these threads are degenerate. If both religions hate each other so much, wait until Europe is 100% White and without Muslims, Jews, Gays, Trannies, Feminists and Leftists before killing each other.

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spillings_Hoard#Moses_coin

(checked)
That's the first thing I did and couldn't find it. Only saw it being posted a couple of times months ago together with some pasta.

Trips confirm

>>>/asatru/
>>>/christian/

Both of you go back to your ovens containment boards.

You're free to leave the thread then. I am of the opinion that christianity is the last major yoke we must throw off before we can answer the (((problem))) so I'll continue my crusade.

It is - and this is the best time for it.
The jew has affected us in many ways but destroying religion was the best thing he did for us.
Their new religion can be National-Socialism if the people can't live without one.

And who is we?

Since these threads are a daily staple, how about I post some thoughts I've been mulling lately on Chriatianity and nationalism?

While the aversion of many posters to the Faith is a given, I am unclear on their goal. Attacks on Christianity are aimed at getting Holla Forumsacks to leave the Faith, and adopt heathenism or atheism. That makes sense from the evangelistic impulse in the former case and from the ideological impulse in the latter. There might be a few weak-souled individuals who are so discouraged by the bombardment of negativity that they would lose their belief. But, in different forms, these attacks have been underway since the Enlightenment in the 18th century, so there is no indication that they will lead to an eradication of Christianity. Other Christian readers, I think the vast majority, will simply believe and reject the "charges" that Christianity and Jesus are Jewish, which they already knew, as meaningless gibberish. They already know they aren't servile or pozzed like their accusers say, and hence reject their charges and double down. People like me will look at the same Christian history, and see it not as sordid but splendid. This is especially true on Holla Forums where most everyone already has strong beliefs and many are strident contrarians.

Even assuming propaganda even more virulently anti-Chriatian than what the ZOG media spews now, many are bound to resist its message and rebel against the demands to abandon or not adopt the Faith. Is the end vision for anti-Christians something like the Czech Republic or Estonia? Both countries are largely non-religious, but Christian congregations certainly continue to operate throughout. Is that sufficient for you all, or does even a Christian minority dampen your hopes for White countries somehow? Or take Japan, which is a pagan country, but has a Christian community at just under 1% of the population. Is that the ideal, or must freedom of worship and to express our opinions as Christians be taken away too? I cannot foresee a future where the anger and complaints and d&c threads stop without a persecution. Is that the end goal or is it something else?

As to why we consider these d&c threads: not enough consideration has been given to the Christian's view of things. Here, we always debate whether nationalists should be Christians, but in the face of attacks on the Faith, maybe the right question is, why might Christians become nationalists? I see essentially two reasons:

-"Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice". As those who follow the news at all know, Whites nowhere have full self-determination, and (((forces))) both political and economic continue to victimize them. That's unjust! If you agree, you can understand how a Christian might come to realize that Whites need countries where they are in charge so that they are no longer victimized.
-Natural virtue. Today's nationalists are Rightists. Unlike the original French Revolution-era "nationalists" who wanted to overturn nature and run things by libertarian or egalitarian ideology and rationalism, today's nationalists believe in manly and womanly virtue, the family, and rejection of public homosexuality. They believe in a view of the good in accordance with the natural law tradition. Hence Christians, not being tied to any one political ideology, who might in the past have supported empires such as the Hapsburgs or Romanovs, are now left with nationalists as the only political camp with views of the good that align with theirs, at least in areas where the good may be known without help from revelation. Actually, this last is one of the best reasons nationalists might want to be Christians: our tradition is very clear on homosexuality. Greg Johnson, James J. O'Meara, Jack Donovan, and Richard Spencer have all been trying to make us tolerate homosexuals to one degree or another, going so far at times as to blame the Jews for making Whites hate homosexuality(!), but of course this wouldn't happen if the nationalist community was more heavily Christian.

All of us Jewish reptile greys in the bermuda triangle

I always wondered who's been behind all these posts.

Shabbat shalom, goyim

Stopped reading there.

Now tell me Chaim, do you pull the strings of the Christians and the Non-Christians in these threads?

I think it's because it originated from the ME and is based on Jewish mythology. So it is foreign to European Nationalism and a lot of people don't like this.

All threads are in my web.

I sure love to see Pagans and Christians argue over who's the real Europeans, knowing that all they're doing is making the Jew stronger while they start a virtual chimpout.

It's just sad that you can't debate the veracity of your religion and instead rely on tried and true conversation nukers like 'muh D&C' and 'muh shilling'. It's clear to everyone involved that your house is crumbling yet you act with incredulity when people don't want to be stuck under the rubble with you. It's very sad, another mind lost to Jewish poison.

...

I thought denying your christianity was a big no-no? It's not good to lie just so you get non-partisan points. We all know you're a shitter shoahed christian.

Yet they control over 5% of the seats on the diet. Its almost like being a religious monitory encourages corruption.

nobody cares, christians aren't going to magically reform into a muslim killing religion and athiests are too busy tipping their fedoras and whining about christians to do anything.

Well, in that case Christianity is only for Europeans cause if everybody stayed in his country other races wouldn't have a clue about Jesus.

So maybe it is a personal revelation for people of a certain race!