I think he mainly falls into C, and if not C, then certainly B
I remember that talk he gave at a university after the thing happened with the dindus initiating another chimpout and Milo going to the president's office. I'll review the distasteful things that I remember:
1.) He let the audience know that he had lost weight. You know, 'cause we're watching his figure, too. Right?
2.) During the questions part, an audience member asked Milo what philosophers he should read in order to learn about the values of liberty freedom and all that.
Milo immediately rattled off a few random writers that he probably studied half-assedly in university. He NOT ONCE named an Enlightenment figure or philosopher. Not one. The very people who gave us our freedom and he doesn't mention one of them.
3.) Another guest came up to the mic. and asked Milo "You claim to be a Catholic, but you are also a homosexual. How can you reconcile these two opposing positions?"
And his answer was fucking pathetic. It was two-pronged. A: The Catholic Church is a good thing, goy. And B: Muh interpretation. I'm not even joking, those were his answers.
I still have a few other criticisms about him, though, that aren't related to that specific talk:
1.) He's a fucking celebrity.
He rode in on a gold litter to talk with a cardboard cut-out of The Donald next to him that he always calls "Daddy"; he constantly makes gay jokes about himself to get the women to love him 'cause you know, ladies for whatever reason love faggots; he styles his hair more than should be acceptable; swears to be 2edgy4U; remember the "Feminism is cancer – thank you ladies and gentlemen!" he gave before walking off to let Based Mom start talking? While funny, it seems like he really wasn't prepared for that event; etc.; etc.
2.) He's a Brit that, for some reason, loves American politics instead of British. Is it the money? If not, what else could it be? He's no true patriot to Britain like Nigel once was.
3.) He really is only there (in the limelight) to serve as just another token for the American "Conservatives." He's their gay guy token, just like Geraldo for the spiks, that fat guy on FOX for the Dindus, etc. He's really only there for that reason, in my view.
Finally, and this is the most important one,
4.) He'd still be a nobody without Gamergate. Yeah, call me this or that, but faggots mooching off of the energy of Gamergate to accrue an audience (and therefore a (((paycheck)))) for themselves is what truly ended up killing that movement, and he's no exception. He truly is no exception.
Honestly, I think he's either a useful idiot (B) or he's smart and knows all of this and is just incredibly cynical and doesn't give a shit about integrity or anything anymore (C). Personally, I always say that when dealing with a media figure, always consider and only reasonably dismiss option (B) before seeing them as option (C). I'd rather think of them as half-way intelligent lying cunts than really being, and this is certainly what he is if he falls into the category if you think about it, USEFUL IDIOTS.
Maybe I'm just seeing people as greater than they are, actually.
Now that i think of it, he's really more of a useful degenerate (which would be (B)).