Was he right Holla Forums?

Was he right Holla Forums?

105% straight would be having a futa fuck a girl.

Wouldn't it be 175%? Assuming it's 100% straight to like girls and 0% straight to like men then girl (100) + man (0) = 100% straight then girl (100) + futa (75) = 175%. Girl on girl would be 200% straight by this logic but two of the same gender having sex is 100% gay so it would be 0% straight and 0% gay (assuming you are a guy). Futas, being neither male nor female (if only entirely or not) will only be gay if a futa fucks a futa with an extra percentage of gay every time the same sex organs touch.

Girl on girl would be 200% straight, gay would be man on man. It would be 0% straight if you were a girl into girl on girl. Otherwise your logic is good, it's 175% straight. girl (100) + girl (100) = 200. The opposite is true if you're a woman, in which case a man would be 100% straight.

But anons, it's mathematically impossible to have more than 100% of something

It's called every number greater than 1.

I think submissive girly boys with tiny feminine dicks and pink boypussies are a lot straighter than futas with huge, unavoidably masculine cocks.

Futas don't necessarily have large dicks. There is no such thing as a feminine dick. A dick is a dick, and dicks are gay.

Masculine features are gay my dude, no matter what set of genitals are attached to them. A dude's a dude and a girl is a girl. Ergo, pic related is gay. is not.

A vagina is feminine by nature. Your pic related would be 75% gay, just like how traps are 75% gay. In one picture you're fucking a woman that looks like a man, in the other you're fucking a dude that looks like a woman. Size of dicks are just fetishes and has nothing to do with whether or not their feminine. I was pointing out that futas not necessarily have large dicks, it had nothing to do with whether large dicks are masculine or if small dicks are feminine. In fact, I was pointing out that dicks are dicks regardless of their size.

This, the genitalia is just an small part of what makes a man/woman in your head. A man/woman in your head is a conglomeration of things, including hair length, hips, body build, etc. If it looks like a woman and have a dick it isn't neccesarily gay.
I hate the belief that the dick makes it somehow better, and liking traps is still gay because they might have defects that show they're a men except if they're 2D. The superior choice is obviously futa, is literally the best of both worlds.


Small dicks are cute and pleasant to see.


Genitalia is not the definitive proof of gender, retard, trannies exist after all, having a vagina doesn't make you a woman, and if your features as a man are more than your features as a woman, which is only the vagina, then you're attracted to that person more as a man than a woman. It's more psychological than psychical.

Say, a penis and balls is 25% of what makes a man sexy in the eyes of women and gay men, other being body build (25%) face and hair (25%) and legs and ass (25%), this is an estimate since I'm not actually gay, also a pretty broad approach.
Now, with women you have face and hair (20%) Body build (20%) Boobs (20%) Vagina (20%) and Ass and Legs (20%) of what makes a woman attractive to men and lesbians, in a pretty broad and general way.
If someone have a penis and everything else is what you deem hot in a woman then you're just taking off 20% of what you like in women and replace it with a men part. In your head, that person is just a woman with a penis, no matter what background it have.

Mental illness does not prove your statement.

I'd say a tiny dick with round, smooth balls is pretty feminine compared to what a normal dick is like.

It's more aesthetically pleasing, I will give you that. But I firmly believe that a dick, regardless of whether or not it's tied up in a pretty knot, is masculine. In principle it is masculine, and in principle a vagina is feminine.

Now you're venturing into tumblr territory, rein yourself in retard.
While a feminine shota boy may look more like a girl than a futa with a massive 14 inch cock, that doesn't change the fact that it's a boy. Your genitalia does in fact decide your sex. Whether you're the girliest boy in the world or the most masculine girl, your sex was decided at birth.

That webm is the stupidest shit i've ever seen.
Do Holla Forums retards genuinely think people marry for the purpose of procreation?
Do they seriously think faggots want to get married just because "love" and/or adopting children and forming a family?

Are you all 12 and never left your mom's basement?
It's about money, you fucking retards.

If that's your belief, that's your belief. We're getting off track here. The real topic is whether or not a feminine shota boy with a small dick is gayer than a futa which almost always have massive dicks.

Personally I think it is. The entire point of futanari is the dick, it's the central focus of the category. Whereas for girly shotas the focus is their femininity, their willingness to take on a girl's role not just in function but in form as well.

Nothing funnier than a leftist pretending to be tough and throwing a tantrum.

You either didn't read the rest or you have reading comprehension problems.
My point is that if only genitalia would define one's gender then trannies that chop off their dicks would be women, but they're not, they're still men with a chopped off dick, and that's only on a biological level Gender is actually determined by your chromosomes no matter how much you try to change yourself with hormones or operations.
Psychologically, you're seeing all woman with only a minuscule part of a man. As your brain process it, that's still a woman. If that "woman" had muscles and lacked a pretty femenine face, you'd have 50/50 man and woman which would be more tricky.

Do I have to explain it to you with a chart like OP's?


That's a shota dick, and I agree.


A dick is just an small part of what makes a man masculine. As I said, there are a lot of other factors such as muscles. It's like saying that liking muscle women makes you gay, when every other feature it's from a woman.


How so? Tumblr believes that you can be anything no matter the genitals, all I'm saying is that genitals doesn't necessary proof that you're either born man or woman, or if you are supposed to be man or woman either.
As I said above, only chromosomes can do that as a fact, no matter how much you try to change yourself on the outside.
True, but I already addressed that here
Yet, I also believe that is a boy is femenine enough, your brain might as well threat it as a woman, specially in a sexual way, since in that stage your brain is less logical.

If it's about money, then why don't you give the tax benefits to every single person regardless of whether or not they're married? Rather, the entire gay marriage was pushing fro the wrong thing if it was about money. The fact is that it's not about money. Marriage was made to support procreation, marriage is a way to financially aid and reinforce children born from marriage.

If we're speaking in terms of what makes a man a man and a woman a woman it would HAVE to be the case that the one underlying difference between the two sexes are their genitalia. A woman can support a man's body (save for their genitalia), and a man can support a woman's body (save for their genitalia). A woman that looks like a man does not change the fact that the woman is a woman. The masculine attribute is an important one to note. To base whether or not a man is a man on appearance is fundamentally flawed, since that is like building a castle on sand.

A woman being fucked by a fictional woman that has both a dick and a vagina would be gay if you were focusing on the dick aspect of the woman. This is all convoluted though, I don't see much point in arguing this anyway.

Please refer to op for optimal sizes

I'd say that being born with the genitalia of a man is proof positive that you are supposed to be a man, and vice versa. If you choose to try and live as something you're not it's almost always because of mental illness.
As the old adage goes; sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.
Which I agree with, which is why I fap to feminine shotas. I think it's worth noting that I only fap to 2D feminine shotas. I've seen my fair share of 3D traps and none of them do it for me, probably because the 2D realm is the only place where a boy can look convincingly enough like a female to arouse me. But in the end you shouldn't allow yourself to forget that this thing with a penis is in fact a boy.

Yes, but the genitalia is not the only part you like from sex. If you ever had sex you'd know that there is a lot of touching and sometimes talking, so even if your dick is inside a vagina, if the person you're fucking looks like a men and you like that, it means that you like vaginas, but like everything else to be from men, which is really gay.
Glad we both agree, but genitalia is part of that appearance, I insist that what makes a man a man is more than a dick, even when having a dick is more likely proof that you're a man. The best example I can give about this is that when you're on the street looking at people, you can't look at their genitalia to identify if they're a man or a woman, you base all of that in looks. If you like "a girl" that turns out to have a dick, doesn't change the fact that you liked it firstly as a girl.


Hermaphrodites exist. Other than that, you're right.
Here's your and probably my mistake as well, user. I'm not discussing if trannies are mentally ill or even trannies themselves, I'm discussing the attraction of people to trannies or futas and whether or not that makes you gay. My argument is that it doesn't matter if the person was born man or woman, all you care about at the moment of having sex is if that person have certain parts of your liking, no matter the gender, depending on the amount of features you like of each gender, you might or might not be gay. If all you like is a penis, that doesn't necessarily makes you gay IN PAPER. Sadly, IRL, only men have penises, but with futas is a completely different story, but futas don't exist.
Same. I don't like shotas either, though, unless it is straight shota, mostly because shotas are pleasant to look at.
In the 2D realm it shouldn't really matter that much. A character can be anything you like, specially if it's a pic with little to no context at all.

It may hurt to admit user, but the vast majority of futa pics out there depict girls with huge, veiny cocks.
Just a cursory look over gelbooru's futanari tag shows this to be true.


But a lot of futanari that I've seen posted isn't woman on woman, it's usually just a lone girl with a dick or a dickgirl being fucked.

any penis = gay

dildonics only

futa on woman porn isn't gay per say, but fapping to it makes you a faggot
If you're watching porn with a man in it, and you don't self-insert as the man, you're a cuck, because then you're jerking off to what you view as another man fucking a woman.
In futa porn, there is no man to project oneself onto, only a woman with a dick, therefore you are either a cuck or a faggot.

...

its no more gayer, if there r balls

There aren't a million fucking stages, you're either straight, bi, or gay. Anything other than straight should be considered faggot-tier.

You're missing the point. Being attracted to an specific male feature doesn't make you gay.

Futa isn't gay
Traps aren't gay

If the person is androgynous or lacks masculine features regardless of their chromosomes in a 2D (fictional) setting it ISN'T FUCKING GAY!

AS LONG AS IT'S CUTE IT WILL ALWAYS BE FEMININE AND 100% HETERO

3DPD does not apply to this rule, real traps are gay as fuck, fictional traps aren't.

As long as assuming youre a male (XY) traps (XY) will ALWAYS BE GAY unless you're a female (XX) who finds them sexually attractive

KEEP TRAPS 2D AND FAP TO YOUR HEARTS CONTENT

END OF FUCKING DISCUSSION
nohomo

It does if you're a male.

If you fap to things that look like men, you're gay. Flat chests, excessive hair, manly faces, male skeletal structure and musculature. Gay.

If you fap to things that look female, you're not gay. Traps, shemales, good trannies, any kind of futa. Not gay.

The male mind works in such a way that what parts are on the crotch of the character you're jerking to has no bearing on sexual orientation. Sex parts = arousing. More sex parts = more arousing.

Get help.

So you're gay if you like body building? You're gay if you like short hair? You're gay if you like muscle women?
You're full of shit, user.


Say that to my face, piece of shit.

Surely you can tell the difference between a male flat chest with pecs and the adorable flat chest of a loli.

The point is, it's the ENTIRE PRESENTATION that matters. If it looks male, you're gay, regardless of what's in the pants. If it looks female, you're straight, no matter how big that she-dick is.

None of those things are strictly a male thing, don't put words in my mouth. A dick is a strictly male thing and a man who is attracted to dicks is gay by definition.

Are you literally retarded? Really, are you? Females don't have dicks, you're talking about men.

Are YOU retarded?
Have you literally never seen a feminine penis?

A penis is not strictly a male thing, a woman can get one with some surgery. Also, there's this
You can like a dick without liking the other shit things. If that dick is attached to a woman, is even better.


If that's what you meant, you're shit at wording. But you're right.

I can't say that I have, given that a penis is an inherently masculine part. Why don't you show me an example of this oxymoronic penis?

Wow, if we're counting mutilating your body, I guess pretty much anything can be a part of anyone.
Okay, I guess you CAN, but it still makes you the definition of gay.
You're still jacking it to some man's dick or a thing that looks like a dick or however they get it on the woman, though. Gaaay.

That's exactly my point. That pretty much means that a penis is not strictly male in these times, same as a vagina and boobs aren't strictly female either.
The definition of gay is LIKING THE OPPOSITE GENDER, not LIKING CERTAIN PARTS OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER. If you don't like it as a whole, including facial hair and the such, then you're not gay.
Everything is possible in 2D. In 2D, a woman can magically grow a penis for all I know and care.

ALSO
Now that I remember, extremely large clitoris looks like penises anyway, so not gay at all. I don't find the video, but it was posted here a few days ago.

No no no, it's still male, just now we've gone and Frankensteined them on a woman. If you sewed a cat's ears on her, too, would the ears become human? No.
The opposite gender IS a collection of certain parts of the opposite gender. If you like dicks or any other part which only naturally occurs in men, you're gay. Sorry you're having such a hard time accepting this. I'm gonna go whack off.

No, but it would mean that humans could have cat ears too, specially if they're fully functional ones.
Exactly, and the individual parts don't represent the whole thing.
Why should it matter if naturally occur in a gender or not? The origin o something is the least relevant thing when you're horny.
I don't even like traps and barely like futas, I'm just playing the devil's advocate and wrecking your ass at it, ironically enough

The balls are what produce testosterone and sperm, therefor no balls = not gay. Prove me wrong: protip, you can't.

People who claim futa is gay seriously have my sympathy. It must really suck to be such a normalfaggot that your private fap material is constrained by artificial constructs of a puritanical society. Did you get a boner looking at an anime girl with a penis when you were 12, and developed such a fear of catching the gay and getting the belt from your dad that you're now borderline-evangelical against it? I've been beating my meat to futa thrice daily for over a decade and it still hasn't given me any kind of affinity for real life males. I think if it was gonna happen it would have already.

Pull your head out of your ass. If you just don't like dickgirls because you find penis unappealing, then say "I don't like it." There's no reason to criticize and label people who do. I know what I am, and I'm not gay. Plus it's only allowed on certain places, and always separated from normalfag porn via categorization. Avoid the places where it's posted if it scares you so much. Or come to terms with your own gayness.

How is liking a fantasy, anthropomorphic bunny with unrealistic sexual organs more straight than a Singaporean comic girl with small balls?

1/10 infographic

...

forgot image

all of them with a penis are gay

...

improved infographic

Because she has balls user

...

The awnser is straigth, gay, fag, queer

???

Is pegging straight?

no

If a man fucks a man with long hair is it gay?

yes

Metalhead-type long hair or trap-type long hair? That's a huge difference.

There is no difference, it's still gay

While hermaphroditism (futanari) isn't a real thing there is something real called intersex.
Traps are just boys with tits thus gay no matter how feminine they look.

If I fuck a man who like long walks on a beach is it gay?

A little.

and what I mean with hermaphroditism isn't real.
I mean there are no real hermaphrodite humans.

...

But it will be

...

...

...

...

I suppose GRIDS is a bio weapon

That's a human problem, so it'll cease to be a problem in the future

...

...

What could a futa possibly be good for

What exactly is not gay about fapping to a girl with a penis? What about a penis looks female?

Oh sure, many things
And many more

not convinced you fucking faggot

Then I guess there's nothing I can do to convince you of how wrong and bigoted you are
Until the field test that is

fuck off

No

...

...

...

You can find plenty of wymyn's marches around the western globe

BTFO

...

...

...