Centrally planed economy

>Ugh, people spend their money to things they want! They should spend it on things I want!

I mean a capitalist system with a welfare system.
isn't that social democracy?

It leads to Sweden and the refugee crises unless you have a strong nationalist component and even then if the culture degrades you end up with the above.

Swining by to request that comparison between the economies of National Socialism, Capitalism, Socialism and shit

At least he put more effort in than all the faggots spamming "7575757575575757575757" to get past the OP requirement that quite frankly should be getting the permab& treatment.

...

I think the 3rd oughta do the trick, it was none of those btw, but thanks nonetheless user

This is also a good point but that doesn't excuse his cuckchan tier post

I would like to actually have a topic for discussion about centrally planned economies being shit rather than just circle jerking over them being shit without talking about why.

1st pic made Capitalism look too cool

you dont understand communism. They KNOW it is a terrible idea. But they also know the idea of taking wealth from the wealthy is a very strong ever present human trait (jealousy)… so they USE communism in order to GET power.

Once they have all the power and control over the economy they have ALL the wealth. This is why communism will never go away. People like obama/clinton/jews can easily use it to capture all the wealth and power.

more:

so essentially the people who talk about the "1%"… the smart ones who control the messages at least…. want to BE the 1% of the 1% but then close the doors behind them (power) so they cant be replaced.

It's a con you stupid goy

He has a peace of bread on his collar, his coat is too big, and he's drinking some girly fruit alcohol.

...

...

...

Fat blue dykes will likely never have the power they dream of. They're just useful idiots being used to open up the gates for plunder.

fuck of 4cuck

Everything lefty is shit. Why is it shit? I'd have to sit here for 3 hours explaining simple genetics to you. And I'm not going to do that because I already know that genetically you are predetermined to not heed those words.

Capitalism in a governance beholden to the people would not see such mega kike banks. The only reason kikes are able to grow these huge sovereignty defeating institutions is because 1) central bank authority was handed to them and 2) they are shielded from the reprocusions of their kike ways by governments not beholden to the people

That's going to change. MAGA!

MAKE AMERICA SELF SUFFICIENT AGAIN. BAN ALL IMPORTS AND EXPORTS. WE ONLY TRADE WITH PEOPLE WHO HAVE OUR AMERICAN IDEALS AND NOBODY DOES.

He looks more like an teenager trying to be edgy.

...

...

...

...

...

Third Position took a bit of Central Planning and it worked wonderfully.

NatSoc is like the Bruce Lee of martial artists; keep the good, discard everything that's shit.

Well actually the initial central planning completely failed.

There were shortages of food stuffs in 1936 and so the Reich removed price controls and essentially most of its central planning.

In fact the Reichsmark was worthless compared to other currencies because the government had no Forex reserves, which made it impossible for germans to vacation or do business in/with other countries.

He looks pretty pissed off to me, but I just can't put my finger onto why

Who needs vacations when you have free lampshades

Central Planning is still what got Nazi Germany to its glory.

Yeah no shit, post-Weimar.

Yeah that's what happens when you break free from the jewish banking cartel. Nazi Germany found a way though, as we all know.

They were able to take vacations in other countries much more than anyone else at that time.

I really wish Stefan was more redpilled and less cultish. Less alt-cuck.

He has the charisma for it, it's a fucking waste of talent. I think Stefan needs to ponder the future of his own race and identify the enemy of his race.

I think Stefan doesn't even know about the invisible war that's being waged against him and his people.

Not to mention that Germany was booming when all of the other jewified countries were in a (((depression))).

They had a directed economy which was significantly more lax than what people think.

en.metapedia.org/wiki/1939_German_economic_policy

no it wasn't, it was actually competitive with the dollar at the time

I wonder why that was…. Keep in mind that the US and UK froze many German assets, and even before 1939, made it hard for Germany to trade.

But you're right about the price controls, but at least the German government (and Hitler) had the sensibilities to remove them, meanwhile in the UK, they kept their price controls even AFTER the war! Hell they even rationed foods! Do you think the royalty was affected?

Which is why they had to employ a barter system.

Economies are not merely complex, they are adaptively complex and so are infinitely complex. About the only thing a government can accomplish in regards to economic control is ensuring a house advantage for their cronies.

Controlled economies require leaders to be perfectly competent and incorruptible which is why they

ALWAYS IN EVERY PERIOD OF HISTORY

fail and become oligarchical. Indeed the problem with America is that it allowed room for government expansion into the economic arena despite it being initially highly limited (which is why the vast majority of our economic growth occurred before 1929)

But I'm so very interested in hearing how you can ensure a benevolent and capable big brother to manage our affairs

Wanting natural boundaries and caps != wanting a "benevolent and capable big brother to manage our affairs"

There should be controls on the economy to ensure continued ethnic purity within the governed state and guard against external predation by other nations, whatever that takes.

You're also (1) so I wasn't writing to you

What caps are you talking about?

...

Well, that's just like i said here:

Here's how i know this is bullshit; you indirectly parrot the old line of 'absolute power corrupts absolutely'.

Which is false; it is ego that corrupts.

And let's not get ahead of ourselves here, you cannot deny the miracle that was Nazi Germany. It took the combined efforts of two (2!) super powers and and allied force to bring it down in armed conflict. And what a battle that was.

As for your economic venture here; it was the shielding of national assets from internationalism (globalism) that saved Germany. Don't confuse this with isolationalism. Should be a fairly simple concept really, it ultimately boils down to sovereignty and having agency.

this, this with the force of a thousand white hot stars

capitalist system with a welfare and a strong nationalist traditionalist dressing on the sides

then you have my permission to social democracy

I recommend reading "Notes on the Third REich" by Evola for a non cucked critiques of the Reich

The Third Reich accomplished some amazing things, but it accomplished them because of Hitler and assuming he had won the war the empire would have fallen into irreparable decline the moment Hitler died. The entirety was focused on the "Fuhrer Prinzip" and required the ability and charisma of a spectacularly talented individual to hold together but it is quite clear when we look at the world around us that such men are not often forthcoming

I would prefer a pretty free market with some labor laws

As for shielding national assets from predatory foreign powers, absolutely. I favor a reciprocal tariff policy that factors in not only tariffs simpliciter but government subsidies as well so that foreign governments can't use stolen tax money to out compete individuals. Also, critical industries need tariffs to foster a domestic market if one would not otherwise develop (i.e. tariffs on steel, food, fuel and other essentials to ensure that these things are produced domestically in the event of a war so that we are not beholden to potential enemies)

Also, no jews in any capacity

False.

If what you say were to be true then there wouldn't have been a need to systematically 'de-Nazify' Germany.

False

Widespread support of an ideology that opposed the jews != the compentency and unique skills of Hitler

The entire third reich was geared around asingle powerful leader. Unless you can guarantee that said leader is always going to be competent and orally sound then you're fucked. And we both know neither you nor anyone else can guarantee that

Well, that's that boys. We can't ever be 100% certain about anything beforehand, therefore we should always do nothing. What have we even been wasting our time here for? Pack it in.

morally*

...

That's not what NatSoc was about though.

Adolf didn't rule nor run the country all by himself.

You just made an argument based upon an absolute proposition, necessarily trivially false. The degree to which you are a fuckwit can tragically only be understood by those more intelligent than you.

You are the moral coward described by Aristotle, dialogue is unnecessary with you, and suppressing you is the only path forward.

If by that you mean that he had lieutenants then of course, obviously; however if you mean that these lieutenants had autonomy to act outside of the fuhrers orders then that is false

Cool

They mostly did.
Hitler had at first the sense to let the men that knewbetter thqn him to run their areas of expertize.
The generals. Guys like Speer.

The Reich was great because of the talent pool. All it needed was someone to rally around

This thread is shut, and bears all the markings of an intl baitpost.

Consider suicide.