/leftypol/ has a sticky thread on "The growing leftist presence on 4chan"

Lincoln Taylor
Lincoln Taylor

Can we please just delete /leftypol/ already? They aren't even hiding the fact they're all halfchan cancer anymore

Other urls found in this thread:

hollaforums.com/thread/1104283/activism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_is_theft!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_is_Property?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
oxfam.org.uk/media-centre/press-releases/2016/01/62-people-own-same-as-half-world-says-oxfam-inequality-report-davos-world-economic-forum
medium.com/insurge-intelligence/uk-government-bacced-scientific-model-flags-risk-of-civilisation-s-collapse-by-2040-4d121e455997#.n00ltif58
youtube.com/watch?v=8NGm-q6miiI

Dylan Bennett
Dylan Bennett

think OPs joking
checc /leftypol/
he isn't
mfw

Dominic Roberts
Dominic Roberts

How come they literally cannot make a single correct decision without being cancer?

Matthew Brown
Matthew Brown

Because they are an offshoot of /pol/

Samuel Ramirez
Samuel Ramirez

REMINDER THAT /leftypol/ is what drew all the spam here for being cancerous propagandist fuccs!

Reminder that unironic antifas a browsing /leftypol/ right now!

Connor Parker
Connor Parker

don't you have boogers to eat, op?
you're worthless

Jordan Morgan
Jordan Morgan

REMOVE /leftypol!

Adrian Hill
Adrian Hill

How long until /leftypol/ tries to transport nuclear weapons to /tech/ and causes a diplomatic crisis?

Owen Reyes
Owen Reyes

They are huge /pol/ fanboys in denial just look at the way they use cucc as a political buzzword.

Anthony Powell
Anthony Powell

when will /pol/ accept the freemasons and the hibernian menace as enemies?

Jaxon Edwards
Jaxon Edwards

It will never happen even figuratively because not only are they LARPers but almost none of them post on any other boards besides /leftypol/ itself, the few that do are either spotted a mile away or does the proper thing and keeps their leftist politics out of other board and blend in peacefully

Adam Morales
Adam Morales

It will never happen even figuratively because not only are they LARPers

Lefties say the same about /pol/.

Benjamin Scott
Benjamin Scott

delete lefties

Luke Davis
Luke Davis

1.) there is more /pol/ spam on Holla Forums then /leftypol/ spam.

2.) butthurt mongoloids scream for censorship beacause their feefees are hurt. deal with it you wimpy millennials. or take your prescripted happy pills.

3.) the intellectual level of discourse on /leftypol/ is usually higher then on /pol/. fact.

ib4 /pol/yps cherrypiccing some moronic leftypol posts. that doesn't disprove my point, less retardiation ≠ no retardiation.

4.) this post will receive butthurt replies.

Nicholas Jackson
Nicholas Jackson

I once went on /leftypol/ to discuss something with them. They just said everything was a spook. That's my experience.

Joshua Gray
Joshua Gray

hollaforums.com/thread/1104283/activism
hollaforums.com/thread/1104283/activism
hollaforums.com/thread/1104283/activism
They're sitting around talking about what boards/threads to raid on 4chan, just like they do here.
/leftypol/ should be deleted. Not because of their laughable political opinions, but because they're a board of infiltrators that raid Holla Forums's legit communities.
This post will receive butthurt leftypol replies.

Jace Price
Jace Price

legit communities
where do you think we are?

Aaron Phillips
Aaron Phillips

Holla Forums. Where do you think we are?

Ryan Perry
Ryan Perry

you're like a guy who goes to /tech/ for the first time and gets told to install gentoo no matter what he says.

"everything is a spook" is a meme spouted by silly 14 year olds who read a thread about max stirner or two.

also, just becuase is said the average intellectual level on /leftypol/ is /higher/ then on /pol/, it's still abysmally low. this is an anonymous carpet waeving forum, so expect lots of morons, d'uh.

i can see that /leftypol/ has replaced /intl/ as the new ebil boogeyman for everything that's wrong in Holla Forums's asperger universe. ok.

Gabriel Torres
Gabriel Torres

Hey leftypol, your damage control isn't working.

Luis Collins
Luis Collins

not an argument

Eli Lewis
Eli Lewis

Nah, on /pol/ I could discuss about things with reasonable people. /leftypol/ doesn't rely on facts.

Ian Collins
Ian Collins

stay on /pol/ then

Elijah Barnes
Elijah Barnes

/leftypol/ are are bunch of useless faggots

Nathaniel Long
Nathaniel Long

No, I enjoy the stimulation of discussing things with not so like-minded people. The problem is that there are very few reasonable people on /leftypol/.

Charles Wood
Charles Wood

Not an argument

Tyler Thompson
Tyler Thompson

projecting hard enough

Josiah Baker
Josiah Baker

interesting. my own observations are different. maybe because my expectations are lower. i just accepted that the vast amount of posts on the chans are garbage. and if you're unable to find the quality threads on any image board and get triggered by the bullshit instead, the problem might be you. maybe you just should go to a place that has more censorhsip, like facebook. there are communities tailored for the needs of people like you.

was of trips. also, not an argument.

Nolan Nguyen
Nolan Nguyen

Niggers on my Holla Forums

Landon Garcia
Landon Garcia

butthurt

Ryder Fisher
Ryder Fisher

You enjoy projecting. This is why I consider /leftypol/ to be filled with fools who think everything is a spook. No, but you're right no matter what. I understand now.

Luke Scott
Luke Scott

Reminder that Trump will be the next president

Anthony Nguyen
Anthony Nguyen

projecting

let's see. i don't have a facebook account beacuse i'm not a millennial attention whore.

do you have a facebook account?

if the answer is yes, you must go bacc.

lol i'm onna call him a mad kike that will make him so sad XDD

is that all you got, kid?

also, terribly wasted dubs.

Hudson Perry
Hudson Perry

not an argument when the discussion was never started with an actual argument in the first place
Hello /leftypol/.

Mason Ross
Mason Ross

good argument.

let me present a rebuttal

Cooper Rogers
Cooper Rogers

Reminding you again that Trump will be the next president

pls return to your containment board

Christian Clark
Christian Clark

/leftypol/ supports furries

Jace Cooper
Jace Cooper

yeah your right /leftypol/ needs to be deleted already. i cannot stand this, it triggers my ptsd. fuccing commies.

Brandon Bennett
Brandon Bennett

Checced

/leftypol/ is a cancer that must be removed

Noah Edwards
Noah Edwards

it's okay if 4chan is full of /pol/accs
it's not okay if /lefty/ posts on 4chan

Perhaps it is you who is the halfchan cancer, OP.

Ryder Rivera
Ryder Rivera

i don't give a shit about people who like to dreaa up as teddy bears so i don't care.

why do you care though?

suppressed desires?

Isaac Ortiz
Isaac Ortiz

who cares? hill or trump? both are corporate puppets. keep fapping to blonde toupet jesus though, people like your are amusing. all these hopes you place in your messiah figures. i'm smiling as i type this.

Logan Cooper
Logan Cooper

/leftypol/ doesn't support Jesus

John Carter
John Carter

Prove anything of what you just said. Inb4 muh shifting the burden of proof fallacy.

Jaxon Lee
Jaxon Lee

what i wrote is based on my observations. you are free to disagree with me. anonymous image boards are not the medium for scientific proof. what kind of "proof" would satisfy you? a spam wave of /pol/ style infographs?

keep being silly, you're cute.

Easton Lewis
Easton Lewis

/leftypol/ hates squirrels

Leo Reed
Leo Reed

finally someone is calling them out. keep fighting the good fight brave user.

Josiah Howard
Josiah Howard

In other words you're a huge dumbass who can't prove a thing.
what kind of "proof" would satisfy you? a spam wave of /pol/ style infographs?
ib4 /pol/yps cherrypiccing some moronic leftypol posts. that doesn't disprove my point, less retardiation ≠ no retardiation.
Quite contridictory there mate. Bacc to your hugbox faggot. /leftypol/index.html

Kayden Gutierrez
Kayden Gutierrez

/leftypol/ hates america

Hudson Reyes
Hudson Reyes

They also hate frogs.

Eli Reyes
Eli Reyes

Quite contridictory
no. cherrypicced facts = /pol/ style inforgraphs ≠ scientific proof

re- read the thread a few times and you'll sees there's no contardiction. after a few hours and with a little help from your brightest /pol/yp friedos.

Bacc to your hugbox faggot.

but why? your butthurt is so amusing. also, you or one of your /pol/ buddies just said you want to delete "my" "hugbox".
that would be a very clever move indeed. certainly ther's be less /leftypol/ spam on /g/n then.

smart move kid.

why are /pol/yps always crying for censorship? why are you so weak? what's the differende between you and idpol sjw? i don't know. maybe you are just like them?

Jordan Mitchell
Jordan Mitchell

we don't hate america, we laugh at america

Ryan Murphy
Ryan Murphy

/leftypol/ hates cute girls

Hunter Ortiz
Hunter Ortiz

keep larping kid. are you having fun? mommy will bring you some cookies soon.

Lincoln Reyes
Lincoln Reyes

not an argument. literally everybody hates cute girls. prove me wrong

Nathaniel Long
Nathaniel Long

/leftypol/ hates dogs

Gabriel Nguyen
Gabriel Nguyen

/leftypol/ hates pandas

Hudson Scott
Hudson Scott

Yes it is quite contradictory. Cherry piccing posts (can be anything people post), is cherry piccing posts. Stop contradicting yourself moron.
re- read the thread
Fucc off I quoted you directly.
why are /pol/yps always crying for censorship? why are you so weak? what's the differende between you and idpol sjw? i don't know. maybe you are just like them?
Woah. Look at those loaded questions man you're smart.

Anthony Lee
Anthony Lee

mad

Carson Cruz
Carson Cruz

/leftypol/ hats cats

Jack White
Jack White

hates them too

Grayson Richardson
Grayson Richardson

/leftypol/ hates dissenting opinions

Angel Lee
Angel Lee

leftypol hates the proles

commies care more about club officers than getting ANYTHING done.

if chrischan had found communism instead of animie you would have another typical commie.

Brandon Howard
Brandon Howard

Holla Forums hates //s

Matthew Ross
Matthew Ross

Holla Forums cares about politics

Nolan Butler
Nolan Butler

leftypol hates the proles
go there and discuss your point with them. might be interesting. problem is, you might be confronted with opinions you don't like. you might even find out that while not being totally invalid in some cases, your statement is a grossly simplifying generalization.

you could just stay here and be a bitch, too.

Connor Taylor
Connor Taylor

/leftypol/ hates heroes

Lucas Butler
Lucas Butler

Holla Forums hates b#b

Caleb Sanchez
Caleb Sanchez

leftypol is full of tripfags
claims to hate identity politics

Owen Cruz
Owen Cruz

/pol/ is always right

John Thompson
John Thompson

Holla Forums hates ass goblins

Thomas Clark
Thomas Clark

/leftypol/ is a goony trash board. Pic related. They also word filter GETs from /sp/ because they're a bunch of bootyblasted clowns.

Easton Jones
Easton Jones

1.) there is more /pol/ spam on Holla Forums then /leftypol/ spam.
/leftypol/ spams Holla Forums pretending to be /pol/.

Gavin Wright
Gavin Wright

Well yeah, halfchan /tv/ is being raided by /leftypol/ 24/7.

Angel Clark
Angel Clark

go to /leftpol/
post:
Leftists can not prove that:
Owning private property is theft.

Leftists do not understand what theft is:
Theft is the classic crime against property, and is typically understood to mean the taking of property from another without their consent.

Response:
Read Proudhon dumbass

Look up Proudhon. He wrote a book called Property is theft! Literally does not even explain and has no arguments as to how property is theft in the book.

Leftists are idiots, Proudhon especially.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_is_theft!

I do like Max Stirner, however with my limited knowledge I don't consider him on the left. He seems like a guy who accepts the reality that "rights" are social constructs and complete bullshit.

3.) the intellectual level of discourse on /leftypol/ is usually higher then on /pol/. fact.
intellectual discourse
leftpol
Nah, they are a confirmation bias board that engages in illogical discourse.

Blake Brown
Blake Brown

meant for

Nathaniel Robinson
Nathaniel Robinson

Oh, the book he wrote on it is What Is Property?: or, An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government.

Property is theft is merely a illogical slogan he used it.
APPLES ARE ORANGES! Proudhon has made his point!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_is_Property?

Liam Hughes
Liam Hughes

It's a joke you dip.
And also not a wordfilter, the mods usually just change the text and remove the image.
Basically changing those GETs is LARPing as if we'd be soviet 1984 KGB truth police. Note the "Image was removed" replacement image.
If you those GETs that seriously that you think they are that relevant…

I would also love to give some context on the checcers guy, but I can't find the screencap of someone explaining.
Basically, he's like a person who comes in a chess club and keeps saying how checcers is bad and posts jpeg infographs on it. Even though people explain to him that this is chess, not checcers, he just keeps coming bacc in every day to spout the same bullshit. That's why he was called checcers, and the only reason this could happen was because you can't punch someone through the internet.

We're raiding 4/tv/ now? Since when? Why? Did the IRC guys organize that or something? Because that's news for me.
I only know of communism general threads that we make on 4/pol/, but you can hardly call that raiding…

The idea was that property in the hands of one meant the absence of property in the hands of another.
The right to property means that the proprietor has the right to use or abuse the property as he sees fit. This also includes destruction of said property.
This is undesirable for society as a whole, or at least, basically everyone who does cannot enrich their lives with that property. Therefore, Proudhon asserts that we should abolish private property, and allow everyone to use such things as common, or public property.

Here is him elaborating on a metaphor from Cicero:
"The theatre, says Cicero, is common to all; nevertheless, the place that each one occupies is called his own; that is, it is a place possessed, not a place appropriated. This comparison annihilates property; moreover, it implies equality. Can I, in a theatre, occupy at the same time one place in the pit, another in the boxes, and a third in the gallery? Not unless I have three bodies, like Geryon, or can exist in different places at the same time, as is related of the magician Apollonius."

"to each one that which belongs to him"

Note that Proudhon mostly criticizes an inequality in the property a person owns. But realize that people's freedom is respected, read, people do not overstep the limits of what they need by using that which another person needs, read, everyone has the same access to the same property, read, equality, means that the very notion of property has become fundamentally different from the definition that we commonly attribute to it.

Justin Thompson
Justin Thompson

YOU HAVE TO GO BAcc!
You know what the sad thing is about /leftypol/ faggots? The one thing I will give them is that they are very good at articulating arguments, granted their arguments and ideas are all shit, they are at least good at making them SOUND some-what intelligent. Similar to how a kid genious explaining why green is the best color. He sounds intelligent, but the argument he is making is fuccing childish.

Red is obviously the best color, Nicholas you fuccing pricc.

Easton Morales
Easton Morales

PRAISE STALIN
R
A
I
S
E

S
T
A
L
I
N

Noah Clark
Noah Clark

If you can't make an argument, but the other guy can, how can't you realize you might just be wrong?

Benjamin Ramirez
Benjamin Ramirez

Can we please just delete /leftypol/ already?
cry harder

Zachary Rodriguez
Zachary Rodriguez

Not an argument

Andrew Bennett
Andrew Bennett

fucc /leftypol/ they can't stop giving arguments and that hurts my spook, remove them REEEEEE !

Lincoln Bennett
Lincoln Bennett

leftypol are SJW tumblr faggots and should all be gassed

Jose Martin
Jose Martin

No.
We are against identity politics.

Jose Ortiz
Jose Ortiz

SJW tumblr faggots only give a shit about race and sex.
We give a shit about socioeconomic classes and the root problem that causes large differences to occur between them.
Spot the difference.

Jordan Williams
Jordan Williams

implying
We all know what you fags are like

And I'm sure you're aware of who causes these issues, right?

Nathaniel Edwards
Nathaniel Edwards

who
Ahh, yes, it's easy to blame a secret society to avoid the fact that the difference in power and the profit incentive is what causes people at the top to act like jerkbags and ruin it for the rest of us.

Connor Collins
Connor Collins

The idea was that property in the hands of one meant the absence of property in the hands of another.
Yes, that is the essence of property. Someone or a group of people decide what happens to a thing.
Property having an owner is not theft, though. The man is just wrong.
Proudhon asserts that we should abolish private property, and allow everyone to use such things as common, or public property.
I'll take your word as true.
An economic theory of a situation within a shared-resource system where individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
People don't take care of common, or public property because of the time constraints and their incentive is to consume it while they have it and fucc the next person who gets it after them because they do not retain ownership of common, or public property and it is someone else's problem.
It is like buying something versus renting it. If you buy something the average person is more likely to take care of it so that it lasts longer because they own it forever so they want it to work for as long as possible. Whereas if you are renting it, you want to get the most utility out of the property in the short time that you have it so you don't think about the long term preservation of the property.
The economic incentives of common, or public property is destructive to the property.

Blake Barnes
Blake Barnes

Many naïve observers of the market economy dismiss concern with the "bottom line" as a purely arbitrary social convention. To these critics, it seems senseless that a factory producing, say, medicine or shoes for toddlers stops at the point when the owner decides that profit has been maximized. It would certainly be physically possible to produce more bottles of aspirin or more shoes in size 3T, yet the boss doesn't allow it, because to do so would "lose money." On the other hand, many apparently superfluous gadgets and unnecessary luxury items are produced every day in a market economy, because they are profitable. Observers who are outraged by this system may adopt the slogan: "Production for people, not profit!"

Such critics do not appreciate the indispensable service that the profit-and-loss test provides to members of a market economy. Whatever the social system in place, the regrettable fact is that the material world is one of scarcity — there are not enough resources to produce all the goods and services that people desire. Because of scarcity, every economic decision involves trade-offs. When scarce resources are devoted to producing more bottles of aspirin, for example, there are necessarily fewer resources available to produce everything else. It's not enough to ask, "Would the world be a better place if there were more medicine?" The relevant question is, "Would the world be a better place if there were more medicine and less of the other goods and services that would have to be sacrificed to produce more medicine?"

Charles Thomas
Charles Thomas

leftists
"everybody who disagrees with me is a nazi"
pol
"everybody who disagrees with me is a jew"

Lucas Wilson
Lucas Wilson

Why can't you type right? Are you stupid.

John Cooper
John Cooper

why are /pol/yps always crying for censorship?

This coming from a commie.

Isaac Roberts
Isaac Roberts

Most leftists don't generally advocate for an almost full anarchy of sorts, such as the one you're describing, where the destruction of property is something that is just allowed to happen.
As it is in the public interest to continue using the commons, it is also in the public interest to protect it against individuals who seek to destruct or damage that property in some way or form. Different systems give different ideas as to how a society can democratically (or less democratically) police eachother as to protect eachother's freedom to continue profiting from using the commons.
If someone harms another's freedom, or, in other words, disrespects it, then he relinquishes the idea that anyone should be respectful towards his freedom.

I would really suggest looking into various kinds of these systems, and of course, they aren't full communism, but they all seek to move towards it, as a sort of transitional state.
In almost all cases, they also utilize some form of socialism, which is one of the necessary factors present in a hypothetical communist society.

Mutualism is a very anarchist form of free market socialism, it's basically what ancaps pretend to be. It's what Proudhon imagined the ideal transitional state to be like.

Anarcho-syndicalism is about worker's unions having control over the workplaces they're in.

Market socialism in general seeks to abolish the contradictions within the current capitalist system, by utilizing the market in a socialist economy, where the workers own their means of production. It is very broad.

Council communism and Luxemburgism seek a very democratic and decentralized control system over society.

Classical Marxism seeks socialism while it stays close to original Marxist thought.

Marxism-Leninism is whatever the fucc Lenin did. The party is supposed to represent the workers here and exercise control over the nation's industry in the interest of the working class.

Stalinism is whatever the fucc Stalin did. Very totalitarian and undemocratic. What people commonly view as "communism"

Maoism is whatever the fucc Mao did. Similar to stalinism, except a more market-based economy, I believe.

Trotskyism is mostly a criticism against Stalin. Trotskyists have a strange obsession with newspapers.

There are also more fringe communist ideologies. Example are:
Anarcho-primitivism: literally, society was better when we didn't have antibiotics and lived in wooden huts and tribes
Anarcho-nihilism: le "no rules" anarchism, because everything is a spook.
National Bolshevism: basically Marxism-Leninism with a large dose of nazi-ethnical-purity-nationalism. Seems to think racial differences are a large factor in whether a society works or not, instead of keeping economical power as the only important factor.
Posadism: Stems from Trotskyism, it's beliefe that we will only get communism when we let ourselves become nuked, after which aliens will come and help us build communism. (I think, it's pretty fuccing meme-tier, like the examples before.)

Adrian Brooks
Adrian Brooks

all leftist are gommies

there are totaitarian leftists, too (tankies, nazbols, strasserists), some could even be considered a leftist fascists. point taken.

but all in all /leftypol/ accepts a much wider range of opinions than your stormfront franchise.

/pol/ mods are way more banhappy than /leftypol/ mods and that's a fact.

Noah Hill
Noah Hill

"/pol/ mods are way more banhappy than /leftypol/ mods and that's a fact."

No, that's an opinion. I have not once gotten banned on /pol/

Ryder Flores
Ryder Flores

reptilians ?

Jaxson Powell
Jaxson Powell

I have not once gotten banned on /pol/
anecdotes are not evidence. you never got banned because you never questioned the consensus in your hugbox.
learn to think for yourself.

Nicholas Myers
Nicholas Myers

everybody knows he meant /intl/. are you just pretending to be retarded?

Joshua Jones
Joshua Jones

anecdotes are not evidence

Says the person who based his whole argument on them. You really shot yourself in the foot there.

Jeremiah Gonzalez
Jeremiah Gonzalez

you might wanna work on your reading comprehension. my claim that /pol/ is more banhappy then /leftypol/ is not an anecdote it's a well known fact. For example rently there were tons of complaints by whining /pol/yps on Holla Forums who were banned because they dared to criticize trump. it was rather funny, their world view seemed a little shattered. on the other hand there's a sticcy on /leftypol/ where bans/ alleged or real transgressions by mods can be openly discussed.

but i assume you're new here, or a just bit dim. because otherwise this wouldn't have eluded you.

Landon Jackson
Landon Jackson

Alright, we can delete /leftypol/ but we will delete /pol/ too.
what say you?

Jaxon Jones
Jaxon Jones

test

Nathaniel Jenkins
Nathaniel Jenkins

i support this idea.

let's delete everything we don't like.

our sacred feefees must not be hurt.

Kayden Ramirez
Kayden Ramirez

their safespace has been fucced over and they are furious about it

Really? Im a /pol/acc and this is the first time ive seen anyone talk about it at all. Delusional faggots.

Owen Cook
Owen Cook

this post is offensive , delet

Ryan Moore
Ryan Moore

reminder that you are a lying scheming bitch.
or as they say on /pol/
SHILL

this asshole tried to PA /baphomet/ to attacc /leftypol/ last night when we told him to fucc off, he came here to try and jew Holla Forums

Hudson Torres
Hudson Torres

this post is offensive , delet

Chase Murphy
Chase Murphy

I'm just going to ramble on like an idiot for awhile.

I do not see any reason to abolish private property. The left is obsessed with abolishing it probably because they aren't very good at attaining it.
Private property neatly solves the tragedy of the commons without the need for other ways of solving it which, if more complex, would require more resources to implement and maintain, therefore they are less efficient thus squander wealth that could be better put to use elsewhere in the market.
Would the people of the world be over all wealthier if there were more common property and less private property? I do not believe that they would. We would have been conquered by the believers in
Mutualism
Anarcho-syndicalism
Market socialism
Council communism
Luxemburgism
Classical Marxism
Marxism-Leninism
Stalinism
Maoism
Trotskyism
Anarcho-primitivism
Anarcho-nihilism
National Bolshevism
Posadism
if their markets generated more wealth.

Leftypol should try out their economic ideas by creating successful businesses before preaching about the merits of them to the world. Leftists are more concerned about distributing rather than making capital.

David Long
David Long

look bucco nobody wants to take away your beloved shacc in the suburbs, your swimming pool and your shitty car. nobody wants to slice open the boobs of your fugly wife and collectivize her silicone titties.

while we are arguing here, 62 persons own as much as the poorest half of the planet's whole population. with such a drastic inequality in the distribution of wealth the idea of democracy is nothing but a sicc joke. the rich buy elections and rule through their puppets.

capitalism is incompatible with democracy. if we want democracy, it needs to be abolished.

oxfam.org.uk/media-centre/press-releases/2016/01/62-people-own-same-as-half-world-says-oxfam-inequality-report-davos-world-economic-forum

Jaxon Jackson
Jaxon Jackson

but all in all /leftypol/ accepts a much wider range of opinions than your stormfront franchise.
Yeah opinions like
2+4=7
2+4=711
2+4=3
2+4=2
are pretty useless though. Just because you have more opinions doesn't make your board any better. Men are concerned with correct answers, not with everyone's unique perspective, which may explain why the range of discussion is limited on pol compared to leftypol.

Caleb Thomas
Caleb Thomas

capitalism is incompatible with democracy. if we want democracy, it needs to be abolished.
Democracy is mob rule. I don't want it.

Isaiah Edwards
Isaiah Edwards

Men are concerned with correct answers
and coccs

Jayden Collins
Jayden Collins

It isn't just about making capital. It isn't just about the GDP a country produces. Anyone can make mudpies. Anyone can sell shit products that break after a week. Look up planned obsolence and you'll see what I mean.

The problem is that the economy is focused on making profit, not producing goods for their use.

You say private property neatly solves the tragedy of the commons, but meanwhile, we still see our environment ruined, we still see homelessness and starvation. Is this because there is not enough for everyone? No! A third of all food is wasted. There are many times more empty houses in the US than homeless people.

You suggest as if the current system is not complex, but do you even know about the derivatives market? Do you even know about all the economic magic that goes into producing money for loans? It is already using up so mach manpower to maintain it in the amount of financial analysts that are literally trading goods that don't even exist, and never will, in the amount of managers that do superfluous micromanaging of worker's who know better what they're doing than they do, in the amount of management and financial consultants and all the other BS faggots that made their job on how to most efficiently screw someone on their wage.
So why hasn't any of those ideologies succeeded by the "free market of nations"?
Perhaps it is because those that hold the most power are intent on keeping it.
Perhaps it is because of the consumerist and red-scare propaganda that was spread by the ones in power to keep themselves in power since Marx's time.
Perhaps because a small nation, however much more efficient than a big one, cannot survive anyways.
Note the example in the image related, look them up yourself if you're interested.
All of them generally failed not because the system in itself was bad, but because the opposition against it was strong, which makes sense if you consider those usually have the support of the ones with the most power.

Aiden Allen
Aiden Allen

Economy isn't independent of politics.

Loans are created by force, not magic.

Kevin Perry
Kevin Perry

my claim that /pol/ is more banhappy then /leftypol/ is not an anecdote it's a well known fact

Based on your observation.

tons of complaints by whining /pol/yps on Holla Forums who were banned

I see the same amount of people complaining they get banned from /leftypol/, also note that /pol/ is a lot larger than /leftypol/.

>on the other hand there's a sticcy on /leftypol/ where bans/ alleged or real transgressions by mods can be openly discussed.

There's a whole board dedicated to this for /pol/ it's called /polmeta/.

And I assume you're new here too. Go bacc to lurking before you post shit.

Carter Barnes
Carter Barnes

So why hasn't any of those ideologies succeeded by the "free market of nations"?
Perhaps it is because those that hold the most power are intent on keeping it.
Perhaps it is because of the consumerist and red-scare propaganda that was spread by the ones in power to keep themselves in power since Marx's time.
Perhaps because a small nation, however much more efficient than a big one, cannot survive anyways.
Note the example in the image related, look them up yourself if you're interested.
All of them generally failed not because the system in itself was bad, but because the opposition against it was strong, which makes sense if you consider those usually have the support of the ones with the most power.
I think they failed because state capitalism is more productive than whatever silly stuff they set up. The other less efficient economic systems will be driven to extinction by a most efficient system.
You can excuse the failure by scapegoating other events, but the common denominator is failure. Capitalism seems to be much heartier than these other systems.

Connor Murphy
Connor Murphy

Capitalism seems to be much heartier than these other systems.

this is what capitalists actually believe

medium.com/insurge-intelligence/uk-government-bacced-scientific-model-flags-risk-of-civilisation-s-collapse-by-2040-4d121e455997#.n00ltif58

good night and good lucc

Thomas Nguyen
Thomas Nguyen

Its true though you dumbass
look at the tagline in pic related. It was their attempt to get 4fags to spam the wrong website and it failed because /leftypol/ fails at everything

Isaac Fisher
Isaac Fisher

leftypol hates identity politics
are always going on about anarchists vs moaists vs nazis vs tankies

Jordan Taylor
Jordan Taylor

Except jews are literally behind most bad things in modern society.
Bankers? Mostly jewish
Entertainment? Mostly jewish
Advertisement? Jewish
Law firms? Jewish
Charities? Jewish (some are)
Military? (well it's not physically jewish, but is under Israeli interests)
Both world wars? Jews claim those are even jewish.

Look at demographics for other institutions, you'll notice similar patterns. Some races are better suited for certain things, proving race exists and that we all aren't just simply human beans. What I listed are fields that all have a VERY heavy jewish presence, but notice a pattern? Most of those institutions make modern society keep running.

There you go lad, now you're on your way to being redpilled "stay woke"

Carter Smith
Carter Smith

I cringed

Jack Jackson
Jack Jackson

/leftypol/ loves the double standard don't they?

Thomas Gray
Thomas Gray

This is why we're being spammed guys

Jaxson Smith
Jaxson Smith

bump

Blake Roberts
Blake Roberts

They have another thread about them throwing propaganda into the face of 4/r8k/

They really are fuccing cancer

Charles Butler
Charles Butler

leftypol hates identity politics
identityflags

Ayden Long
Ayden Long

/heftypol/ go
I dont want to share the fruits of my labor

Xavier Taylor
Xavier Taylor

whole lot of /pol/ tears. youd have my sympathy if you werent so intrustive

Bentley Sanders
Bentley Sanders

idk but, if you look at the .pl board of leftypol, you'll find quite a bit of shitposts that have landed on the wrong board.
It is not necessarily because of that specific message, but mostly because 4chin newfags just google'd /leftypol/ and found the .pl version, because 8ch.net is blocced from google.

TORposting is enabled IIRC, you can question mods in the relevant sticcied thread.

When leftypol talks about idpol, we generally mean things like national, gender or racial identity, and people basing your politics around that.
The flags are mostly there to show people which ideology you adhere to, and shitposting.
And most of us think the tripfags are cancer too.

Mostly jewish. But what about the non-jews? They too are doing bad things. When you look at it, the bad things are often done by the people who have A: the power to do bad things and B: the interest to do so.
The power comes from money. The interest is for more money.

And pure demographics correlating a certain way is not definite proof, it is merely correlation. Many blacc people in my country are well integrated and educated people. This proves that race is at least not a definite factor that determines how one should be judged.
But even if you believe some races are better at certain things, doesn't this mean that division of labor in a multicultural society would be more efficient and profitable for society as a whole, than keeping all those people who are good at helping others out in different ways separated?

I hope you guys don't seriously think we jerk off to those guys.
It's usually qt kurdish soldiers instead.

Yet you give it to your boss, who then gives you a fraction of its true worth in return?
Under socialism, you would own the means of production with your fellow workers, and, depending on variant of socialism, would also be the owner of the fruit of your labor. (This of course depends, market socialism or syndicalism are the ones that usually let you have it, while other systems generally have some intermediary)

Liam Smith
Liam Smith

I don't like x delete it

youtube.com/watch?v=8NGm-q6miiI

Ethan Harris
Ethan Harris

.pl has a huge message at the top that says "We are not the original Holla Forums" you fuccing faggot

Bentley Fisher
Bentley Fisher

Why is it that /leftypol/ always resorts to spamming and blatantly fallacious arguments when things don't go their way?
At least /pol/ faggots will generally just call you a kike and then fucc off when you shit on them for making retarded posts.

Luke Baker
Luke Baker

Yet for some reason, day's worth of high-autism shitposting was all dumped there.

Justin Wood
Justin Wood

it's not a false flag if /pol/ does it!

Nolan Brooks
Nolan Brooks

fallacious arguments when things don't go their way?
[citation needed]

Christopher Hall
Christopher Hall

Why do you cucks care what they do? Is /pol/ such a furious circle jerk that they can't handle opposing view points? Is your ego really that fragile? Do you realize the level of SJW mentality you faggots have? It would be ok if you were Nazis who were funny and could appreciate your own ridiculousness, but you're a bunch of insufferable losers who's entire purpose for existing is some asinine ideology that lets you feel special and blame someone else for you being such a nigger faggot. Let's get back to the funposting already

Lucas Taylor
Lucas Taylor

Look at literally any thread that doesn't go their way for your citation.

Brayden Robinson
Brayden Robinson

user, every thread gets their way.
but i have to admit /pol/tard don't offer much resistance and aren't bright.

i wish we could raise the debate.

Hunter Myers
Hunter Myers

why do you care what a board that has actively raided non-political boards in the name of getting back at /pol/ do
I fucking despise them for ensuring the death of any non-political discussion on other boards.
I don't pay attention to politics, I don't care about politics, but I do like to post on various boards about other topics.
This was already hard enough to do with /pol/ shitters finding any reason to fuck an argument into "ur n SJW" territory, and it became next to impossible to do when /leftypol/ faggots decided to go in the opposite direction and accuse everyone of being nazis if they didn't suck tumblr clit.
The fact that they literally have had threads calling on each other to spam their shit everywhere any chance they get is enough to make me hate anyone and everyone like them.
They are pure and unbridled cancer.

Keep telling yourself that you deluded piece of shit.
I'm sick of you dropping low energy b8 into every thread outside of your specific hugbox and then derailing it even further with shitty see-through fallacies when things don't go your way.

Aiden Brown
Aiden Brown

Both /pol/ and /leftypol/ are hugbox circlejerks that do nothing but scream and bitch and whine that the other isn't in line with what they think.

Nathan Moore
Nathan Moore

here, did I somehow imply otherwise?
I just want to shitpost about dumb shit like anime or movies in peace.
Nobody has been able to do that at all on cuckchan for years, and from what I've seen nobody has been able to do that here since about two months before the election when the butthurt shitflinging really began to ramp up.

Dominic Stewart
Dominic Stewart

I didn't read the first half of the post tbh. Blame the second exodus and /pol/ feeling the need to shit up as much as they possibly can outside the site.

Aiden Jones
Aiden Jones

low energy b8
from 1 to 10 how sexually attractive do you find your sister?

if you don't want to lose arguments don't hold stupid beliefs

Oliver Robinson
Oliver Robinson

not falling for it /leftypol/yp
/pol/ does this same shit when called out and it's tiresome and insulting at this point tbh

Parker Nelson
Parker Nelson

I never wanted this.

Now all I ever do on this site is discuss politics.

Jaxson Hill
Jaxson Hill

You can try /k/ if you're into guns and shit like that.
Don't get me wrong, they sure as hell have politics threads, but faggots attempting to derail every single thread into that sort of shit aren't tolerated like they are on most other active boards.
/co/ and /tv/ used to be pretty good with avoiding constant political derails, but both have gone way off the deep end for different reasons.
/a/ vols ban the shit out of you for anything and everything it seems, but that isn't really much of a change from the cuckchan days tbh

Chase Ward
Chase Ward

lol xD "delet" this meme lol

Hunter Fisher
Hunter Fisher

I've been to /k/ before and was always impressed by how little political bullshit there was. Too bad I don't have much to discuss there.

It is what it is. Things have gotten better since the election has ended though.

Charles Clark
Charles Clark

Settle down, children.