WEBM - /new/ edition

Making /new/ b central
They won't ban for opinions.
Let's bring love of LAIN with us.
Bears unite!

Other urls found in this thread:

akiba-online.com/threads/mp4-3-63-gb-ooniku-012-usagi-minagi-nozomi-baba-aya-toyohashi-yui-mizumori.1473619/
youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
youtube.com/watch?v=boo_Ii2Iam4
exhentai.org/g/743731/f3caa5ff16/
youtube.com/channel/UC5vQlOdCwEglFHbqEeD3jHA/videos
vk.com/baffometi1
pollingreport.com/guns.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>>>/new/ wants to be a low rules politics board. Let us bring our love of the world with us.

...

I endorse an unbiased Holla Forums as long as I can shitpost and troll in it.

...

I endorse an unbiased Holla Forums as long as I can shitpost and troll in it.

thats >>>/leftistpol/
we need to take /new/ right now

bait.

...

...

Fuckin' boss

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

a man after mine own heart

...

...

>>>/new/
lets make b great again

...

wew

...

...

IDK why, but I really really want the sauce for this…

I have been dismissing all of the reports for months, and trust me the /tex/ style sheet isn't going away.

Sauce? I beg of you.

friendly reminder that alt-Legacy boards never work. They might become popular for a month, maybe even 2 but they inevitably fail in the end.

yea, make /new/ the new Holla Forums why not? less Holla Forums threads on /new/ but way higher post quality? why not bro?

abloo abloo no dont try it my shill boss wouldn't like that

I'm just speaking from experience. I've been here from the beginning and I have seen them all rise and fall. They never prevail. Go ahead and do it though. You'll think of my post in a month or 2 :^)

go play dreamcast or something lol

A Legacy board is a board that is inspired by original 4chan boards, like Holla Forums for example. It has nothing to do with how popular it is or how you use it.

...

What kind of faggot language is this from?

Nice reading comprehension, faggot. I said alt-Legacy boards always fail. 8/b/ isa legacy board. People who make alternatives to it always fail. Get it yet?

Anyone have these still?

of course I do

but u are wrong

Jesus christ, you plebs are intolerable.

Give me an example of when an alt-legacy board actually became popular and stayed popular for over a year. fa/gg/ot boards don't count because they are not alt-legacy boards.

Holla Forums is technically an alt-legacy board

No it isn't, you colossal faggot. Do you not understand the concept of a Legacy board?

Legacy board = a board that is inspired by original 4chan boards.

That's incredible. I've been hoping to get them off /webm/ or /r/ for weeks. Do you have the one with the thumbnail I posted, or know what the source material is?

yes

I don't

I appreciate your help. Happy trails!

Holla Forums, and if you disagree, you'll have to define "alt-legacy board" for me to be sure that you aren't merely choosing the most successful of several boards inspired by an original 4chan board, calling it the legacy board, and leaving every other board as an unsuccessful "alt-legacy board".

Holla Forums is based on /g/. It has the same guidelines and follows the same structure. Just because a board doesn't have the exact same name as a board on 4chan doesn't mean that it isn't a legacy board.

As an example, an alt-legacy board on Holla Forums would be a board that says "hey I'm kinda like Holla Forums but I want to accomplish X and allow X in order to succeed." It's an alternative to a board that is already established on this site and was already based on a board on Holla Forums. It adds in different criteria that is already existent on the board.

...

That "definition" is pretty flaky.

Holla Forums has a >>>/g/ board, which was obviously a legacy board of 4chan (>>>/g/1). >>>Holla Forums is a board which serves the same purpose, but it did what it needed to do to become the popular board. This is akin to saying, "hey, Holla Forums is kinda like /g/, but we're going to do X and Y to be successful", which is like that part of your definition.

>>>Holla Forums and possibly even >>>/christian/ can be considered offshoots of legacy board >>>Holla Forums, seeing the need to have similar discussions from a viewpoint different from much of the rest of the board and more focused on something else. /christian/ might be a bit of a stretch, but Holla Forums is absolutely in the same vein as Holla Forums in terms of rules and purpose while being different in goal.

If those don't count as far enough removed to be considered alt-legacy, you can look at >>>/baphomet/ or >>>/cow/ as offshoots of Holla Forums or >>>Holla Forums as an offshoot of /a/. >>>/v9k/, >>>/brit/, and >>>/newsplus/ are all alternates to legacy boards, though admittedly none have hit the one-year mark (maybe /newsplus/ did, I don't remember how long ago it was first shoved down people's throats).

I'm just throwing out a whole bunch of examples of different degrees of relation to legacy boards because your definition isn't very clear. It seems like you're looking for something like 4chan's /vp/ or /vg/ to have shown up and become popular on Holla Forums, and for that, I have to point you again at Holla Forums.

...

>Holla Forums has a >>>/g/ board, which was obviously a legacy board of 4chan (>>>/g/1). >>>Holla Forums
But Holla Forums caught on faster and now it is the legacy board which serves the same purpose as /g/ on 4chan. Just look at it, they have the same common memes. The only difference is, there are actually a more concentrated amount of tech literate people on Holla Forums. It isn't an alternative, it's just a better choice.

>>>>Holla Forums and possibly even >>>/christian/ can be considered offshoots of legacy board >>>Holla Forums
Yes, Holla Forums is a leftist version of Holla Forums, therefore it is alternative. It is probably the only example that you can give, yet it is dying quickly. /christian/ is a christian version of Holla Forums, therefore it is alternative. It has 17 pph and well under 300 active users currently. These results are given in a 72 hour period, are you trying to tell me that it is popular?

Okay, you you have given one example (Holla Forums). Which is the other one? Why do you think some random board can rise to the top all of the sudden?

look at this cool person. what a great person.

also read this in trumps voi/ce

Ah, yes, this is what I was worried you might say. 8/b/ is the legacy board of 4/b/… until it isn't. If some other board that serves the purpose of Holla Forums (say /newb/) becomes popular and Holla Forums dies as a result, then /newb/ becomes the legacy board and Holla Forums is just a dead, formerly-legacy board. /newb/ is never considered the alt-legacy board of Holla Forums as it becomes popular, nor is Holla Forums considered the alt-legacy board of /newb/ as it dies off, even though /newb/ had likely come about as an alternative to Holla Forums when it had been a legacy board.

If what you consider to be the legacy board of 4chan can change hands merely on popularity, of course you are going to have a hard time identifying alternatives.

You asked for one example, you got it.

I can't say I follow the day-to-day popularity of boards. However, if a board can consistently get more traffic than 8/a/, the legacy board of 4chan's third most-popular board, then it is popular enough.

You are already aware of such boards as /gamergate/, /gamergatehq/, /gg/, and /ggrevolt/. They were popular when people wanted to use them and when people didn't, they left, or when they wanted an alternative, they used one. Holla Forums and /christian/ may be more popular now as a result of recent politics, and when things change and the desire to discuss things from those points of view change, those boards will become more or less popular as a result.

/furry/ and /erp/ are possible exceptions, as I understand they have been getting spammed lately. I am unaware of any such thing happening to Holla Forums or /christian/ or any other board, discounting shills on Holla Forums or Holla Forums.

I'm not even going to read that wall of text.

You are trying to make some argument on the definition of a legacy board when it is simple and has been around ever since this site has existed. You are just coming to terms with it. I feel kind of sorry for you. If I had a choice, I'd just send you to the gas chambers so you would have a quick escape.

...

...

thats why we make it b central

...

So long as we know who between the two of us is making arguments, I'm fine with that.

You're making huge gobbledygook comments that detract from the real argument. My argument is simple, alt-legacy boards never succeed and they never will.

so you enjoy pol mods as they have been since mid 2015? here on Holla Forums?

No, I haven't enjoyed them for the entire time that I have been there. They are commiecuck faggots that deserve to be destroyed. Holla Forums is still a legacy board though.

and so instead of trying alternatives, boards, even sites, you choose to be a slave to their failure in powertripping

explain to me again why any user should give a fuck about your self pity?

Jesus, you are fucking thick headed. I'm saying that trying doesn't matter. Hell, I tried a alt board a couple years ago, guess what? It failed. It doesn't matter if you try it out or not, I'm saying that it will fail in the end. I'm just basing it on statistics. I watch the board list closely and have been ever since I fist started coming here. Alt boards always fail. G ahead and give it a show though, you fucking retard.

if all alternatives fail how did 8ch pol become the alternative to 4ch pol?

It never was. It was the default Holla Forums. Are you a retard? Scroll up.

you made need to scroll up
ill recap

>and so instead of trying alternatives, boards, even sites,

In other words you either failed to read the word "boards"
or you are incapable of admitting you just fucked up

...

He already did, nigger

he only won because of the flawed electoral college. most americans wanted clinton. also, not an argument

"The millions of illegals flooded in by Obongo won the popular vote"

Yeah, that's so glorious. All of those illegal citizens who were granted citizenship by a communist nigger are so cute. They are true citizens of this country.

drumpf is not my president

He will be on January 20th! :^)

no he wont be, im not even american

Good for u. Who cares

its not about who cares, its about whether or not you were correct in saying that drumpf will be my president
have fun with your kosher candidate though

anyone got the whole webm

The pic doesn't say he's going to be your president dipshit, just that he's going to be the president–which he is, and all you can do is cry about it.

What I said:
What you said in response:
What I said in response:

I wasn't responding to the picture, I was responding to what you wrote.

you're still wrong

drumpf is not president of my country, so im right fgt

Wasn't me dickhead, try again.

im so sorry for not differentiating between two faggots on an anonymous imageboard

C'mon little-dick, you can apologize better than that.

check em

fuck, im sorry for being autistic
hows that?

...

An apology isn't going to cut it this time user

keep thinking you're redpilled

after im done shitposting ill consider it

That's not an argument. That's a claim. The argument is the process of backing that up. When challenged, it turns out you don't have a clear definition of what an alt-legacy board is, and what you consider to be a legacy board is so amorphous that you can make alt-legacy boards to be pretty much whatever you want. Even then, you admitted that Holla Forums is an alt-legacy board with some success over a long period of time, which is all that is necessary to show your claim is false.

Oh, and this isn't an argument either, but just showing that you are incapable of or unwilling to read my posts.

Does anyone have the webm of some Asian woman tying a mouse to the back of a chair and whipping it? Can't seem to find it.

...

bumping for source. Found a few sentai parodies, but can't track this one down.

I'm gonna need some source on this, fellas.

bump

Ooniku 12
Good fuccing lucc finding it.

...

thanks, and you weren't kidding. Can't find a torrent anywhere. May have found it on a shady site. If it's good I'll post a link.

i need sauce of song

Good god damn, look at all those scared white people scatter, rather than help someone who was legitimately being attacced by a group of filthy animals. What a disgrace, especially the "men". They're no better than the Chinese when it comes to cowardice.

Always be on the lookout for signs of a beta uprising.

Reheheheeeeaaalllly

FTFY

delet this

Maybe they are cowards but most likely it's not their business so they don't really care. Kind of like when you are driving and you see a car pulled over off the road with their emergency lights flashing but you don't stop to help.

akiba-online.com/threads/mp4-3-63-gb-ooniku-012-usagi-minagi-nozomi-baba-aya-toyohashi-yui-mizumori.1473619/

Why the fucc would a white person stop to help anyone in a fight between two shitskins?
If it was another white being attacced then you'd most certainly have a point.

the guy who was attacced was white

Are you fuccing color blind?

And so god came down to give that sheboon a mighty slap and give justice to the animals who defended her.

And now I finally know how Trump won and won big league.

Still happy anyway.

I too require moar.

the one wearing the beanie thing? looks white to me (couldnt get a good look at htem though)

Congrats go kill yourself nigger.

has mollyjew finally lost it?

big man looked like he knew what to do, trust me big people can take care of theyselves

...

Allowing legacy boards was a mistake

when they were global boards under hotwheels they made sense though

...

Nice trips to be fair

the fucc?

...

the fuuuuuucccccckkkkk?

...

(checced)
Context of pic?

looks like an adult boyscout was given a glocc and a blacc woman mistook him for a cop.

thank you

Found the source - unfortunately this is the best part ;_;

anyone know the name of the song in this webm?

Where do I sign up?

+1 please

darude - sandstorm

It's a German song, "Der Friede Nacht": youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Anyone got this with sound?

you?

Sorry, my fuccing mistake

You really don't know how to spell do you? Go to school kid.

woah its 2009 agen
classic meem

punt her by the pussy

Time for sam

...

...

u think he puts on avoice, or did he sound like throat cancer patient from 13?

i want some anti-fag and futa-hater to speak about this

remember, when lara croft was rich and went on adventures, cuz she liked it, instead of being pampered child doing what she was told by her tour guide? And when she had tits, cuz that didnt stop her?

pls email [email protected]/* */ if you're a cat named sakamoto and want a cute furret to licc your paws
$100 is fine
a McD meal is around HK$30 here
I suggest buying an octopus card it can be used pretty much anywhere

B-but I only just started watching Kamen Rider…

trips
thanks for removing the cringe text, m8

Except that's bullshit. They don't wobble because of how you assemble them, they wobble because of their design/engineering. Just accept it and shut up for good.

oh shit, this is now my all time favourite photo of yours

thas the teenage edgefig syndrome

nah

But the US grew the fastest in its history when it was extremely protectionist?

It was literally the most protectionist major nation from 1870-1945.

I'm not saying cause -→ effect

But there's nothing empirical about some golden mean in protextionism

...

we will take some better pics tonight to share here instead of trying to cap old vids :)

...

...

I always wait for the day someone post this webm without papa franku

...

wew

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

this is now a running in the 90's thread.

...

...

souce?

My relationship rn tbh

...

...

...

what in the everliving fucc is western civilization coming to.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

/r/ why man, why

Nigger, you literally had to search for "me step mum's too fuccing hot" on youtube and get it as the first fuccing result. How can you be this technologically retarded in this age and time?
youtube.com/watch?v=boo_Ii2Iam4

Booooooooooooooring

I asked for the hentai name you reatard.

Here you lazy fucc.

exhentai.org/g/743731/f3caa5ff16/

tragedy porn

...

...

you asked for sauce you fuccing faggot, you didn't specify sauce on the video or the autism comics.

Ye, but I guess thanks anyway you pice of shit.

Posting this again in the hopes that a Nip-speaker can tell me what is she saying? ;_;
My guess is that she is either bragging to a friend how she fucced her own mum, or she tells someone she won a bet by fuccing her mum.

We should make our own Tomb Raider game, with a Lara who dresses in skimpy outfits and sports a pair of tits the size of Lolo Ferrari’s, with a focus on gameplay and visuals.

...

...

source?

what is this

Jesus fuccing christ, everyone don't clicc this it's ear-rape.

it's pretty hot tbh

fucc these god damn Christmas hats already. It's not funny anymore.

I can't really speak for companies since each one is fairly unique but public companies who hoard cash tend to have weaker stocc support unless they do something with it. Businesses do like to invest in things that make them a profit, usually improved technology, they just don't bother when the taxes are too high.

Then again they could just turn around and raise dividends a ton which would make everyone happy as fucc. According to a small pizza company I talk with, they would update their online advertising, hire a few more people . If every company makes a few minor changes like that it would improve growth a bit.

Is it bad I learned how to tie braids in my hair from that video?

...

jake and amir was the only good thing to happen to collegehumor. shame they're cuccs, though.

i fully credit you with it and completely appreciate your contribution to the glory of image board freedom.

thank

...

...

"Hello? Keiri? Yeah I'm still up. I was just playing with my mom. Oh, really? Yeah I'll definitely go. And you can come picc me up? I'm so excited!"

dunno the context but it seems like mundane filler dialogue

What on earth is this?

...

Much thanks my dude.

...

vk.com/baffometi1

I should have seen this coming.

...

...

...

same shit different thread

...

...

...

...

...

This guy is beyond stupid.

...

...

Are you saying that democracy isn't controlled by the special interests of a few?

Are you saying that popular vote should remove all right?

What do you mean by this?

...

rights*

nice jew meme

I agree that popular vote will not get everything correct, and it may even get it very very wrong from time to time, but I cannot think of a better system. I share Churchill's sentiment on the issue, that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others.

how about no government

Except with the popular senate vote, you would only have popular bills getting passed. Gun laws? Banned in a heart beat becasue well fuck checks and balances and the consitution.

I never said democracy sucks (it does) we have a SPECIFIC CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Thats the way they are meant to be.

How do you plan to implement no government? anarcho crapitalism is as idealistic and unrealistic as communism.

If the constitution represents the will of people hundreds of years ago why should people living today be restricted by it? Like I said, democracy isn't perfect, but it's better than anything else. Your argument in regards to guns assumes that most Americans want to ban guns - I doubt it.

inform people and help them be less reliant on the state

whats more realistic, living like a slave and learning to like it? only for you

...

Even communists have had more success than Ancraps. Your ideology will never leave the drawing board.

Anarcho crapitalism will enable real slavery, not metaphoric slavery.

media preaches it so they would be banned in this day and age. Just because x is old does not mean it needs to be replaced.

I support gun ownership and unless you can present a nation-wide survey showing support for a gun ban, the point you're trying to make is invalid - considering the election of Trump (I doubt any significant portion of his voters supports a gun ban) I doubt the majority would support it. I also never said that because something is old it needs to be replaced, nice attempt at strawmanning me though faggot.

pollingreport.com/guns.htm

2 ezy.

What percentage of the US population do these polls represent?

wait did you even read this? It's polling democrats, republicans and independents, doesn't say what percentage of those polled they make up, and democrats are more or less 50/50, while republicans are about 70/30 (in the first one at least, got any you want me to see in particular?).
Not sure if you're retarded or arguing in bad faith.

nvm viewed the first 2 tables as seperate, but my original point still stands

The polls are consistent. Democrats make up majority of the population. So if it went down to a popular vote there would be a gun ban. Trump lost the popular vote and the assault weapons ban has always been a popular with dems epically with minorites of any race not whtie.

The polls also showed that Hillary was going to win by a landslide. Until you get an actual official poll you have no argument. Even so, if most Americans want a gun ban, let them have it; they will only have themselves to blame for the consequences.

She would have won if it was a popular vote and the polls were right to a degree, did she not have more than a million lead vote? Is that what your were arguing?

The polls showed a much closer race when you go to the state polls. But the argument is popular vote and Hillary DID in fact win that by the biggest margin to date. Again, your argument was FOR POPULAR VOTE SENATE BILLS. Did Hillary not win the popular vote?

Also I am not for the ban, but I am arguing that guns would be in for a hella of a fight to not get banned if they do what you wanted them to do in the video and that is Senate popular vote bills.

I never said anything about the senate, I was talking about popular vote the entire time.

Yes, she won the popular vote, and imo this is a case where true democracy would fail; I still believe it a better system however as it expresses the true will of the people.

Was the poll you linked from the senate?

EDIT
True democracy from the beginning would have not brought in an influx of non-European immigrants from shitty 3rd world countries who inevitably vote for more progressive politicians like Hillary - the current demographic state and by extension the popular vote of America is because of politicians not voting for the will of the people in the first place.

This video.

I never even commented in regards to that video, I asked whoever it was who replied to it if they believed that current democracy isn't controlled by special interests.

nice claim about the unknown
care to prove it? or shall i dismiss it with the same zeal you've shown support for your argument?

sure, if dead people, and double votes were real

OK, I'll entertain the idea of your impossible utopia; what's stopping me from having a slave in Ancapistan?

first why do you term a state like name to a none state region?
whats stopping the slave from cutting out your eyeballs?

Do you want to convince me and everyone else reading this thread to be an ancap or do you want to play word games?
Nothing, just like nothing stopped me from owning slaves, and like how nothing stopped black slaves doing the same in pre-Civil War America. Got an argument you'd like to present now?

i fucking love this video

yeah, there were clear governments there

im sure in your fantasy government loves you

ive seen your shitty art
all you want to be convinced of is that big brother loves you and will always love you

Nothing stopped a slave attacking their master; there would be consequences, but nothing stopped them. What's stopping me from hiring bodyguards to inflict consequences on my slave after they cut out my eyelids?
In modern government (in non-shit countries) slavery is outlawed - not so in Ancapistan.

k. Got any actual points to make?

Been told by jews their entire life to do what is displayed.

U mean like the social contract?

Now that you mention the social contract I can't tell if that picture I posted is for or against ancap.

...

10/10 really made me think

this /new/ enough?

Do you? No one is trying to convince retards to be sane.

I asked a simple question of what there is to stop me owning a slave in Ancapistan, and you chose to play wordgames, followed by answering my question with another question.
Want to start over and answer it, or just going to keep dodging the question?

...

...

...

...

if this man said this to me any other setting then the internet I would loose my shit in complete rage. STUDY THE FUCKING US CONSTITUTION YOU FUCKING MORONIC SHIT FOR BRAIN. IT'S DESIGNED SO STUPID POPULIST CANNOT RUIN EVERYTHING? DO YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS TO EVERY DEMOCRACY FAILURE. WITHOUT FUCKING A SINGLE EXCEPTION EVERY PURE DEMOCRACY HAS FAILED.

BECAUSE A FUCKING POPPULIST IDEA CAN BE MANIPULATING INTO CREATING SYSTEMS THAT WORK AGAINST THE IDEALS OF THE STUPID MOTHER FUCKING COCK SUCKING PEOPLE.

Prime example would be caesar in rome. HE IMPLEMENTED A FUCKING TYRANNICAL SYSTEM OF OPRESSION WITH POPPULIST SUPPORT. The fucking people will ALWAYS fuck themselves. the founding fatheres new this. THEY WERE SMARTER THEN YOU SHIT STAIN OF EXISTENCE. Im not a violent person but this shit puts me off the deep end holy fuck. Im apoplectic with examples why this is wrong.

god i love japan they're so right in the wrong ways

best ringtone ebah

...

oh wow

source video?

...

want to stop being retarded? your opinion doesnt matter because you dont plan to take any facts into consideration
you're just here to raise objections no matter what

>>>/salt/

More dodging the question, ancaps cant into debate.
Let me make this real fucking simple for you:
Answer the question faggot, you're not doing much to break the stereotype of ancaps being whiny autistic children right now.

...

You're not.
By swearing constantly and insulting with childish jokes you have shown your intent, how stupid are you?

...

I ask again, what stops me owning slaves in Ancapistan? If you can't answer a simple question about your ideology you either don't understand it or it's shit, which one is it?

English

Guns stop you.
If you're asking something like, what stops me from using my own children as slaves, there is little stopping you in any system that doesn't have 24/7 surveillance on you.

So in an ancap society, upon their existance being realised, slaves would be relying on the goodwill of others to risk their lives to liberate them? Because in a society ran by government, the police/military would fulfill that role, and they receive a paycheck from the government as their motivation.
To me this seems like a better system as they receive professional training for dealing with this situation, and monetary compensation, all from the government, for their role in this process of liberation, whereas in a profit driven ancap society I don't see how moral issues such as slavery would be resolved, as there is no financial compensation for being involved in it.

Actually I think I just realised the answer to this myself; the land/resources being used by the slaver would be their compensation. Let me think about this for a bit but I concede that point.

How would an ancap society defend itself against an equal, but aggressive power, say one which had a military industrial complex, conscription, etc. and would doubtlessly produce a larger army, considering that in an ancap society there could be no conscription or other such militaristic features?

...

that's mikediva bro

Welcome to Anarchism.

Not really, I followed up with asking , and I am still leaning towards some kind of welfare state, but I'd imagine you don't see not having a welfare state as an issue so there's nothing to be gained from bringing it up as opposed to slavery/defense, issues which I'd imagine have more universal opinions so are easier to base arguments on.

These arguments tend to be emotional and when you make them with the bias that the current way of things is good they are not good arguments.

Same way as with any size of force of any capacity. Precations with defense and having contacts for help when needed.

Conscripts are the worst soldiers. This is why mandatory draft for males of age has been discontinued in most countries

Why would there be no militia in a society with no government. There are many examples of men training for combat without any state enticements.

You can throw the word emotional at it all you want - it does not, however, attack the legitimacy of the concept - look at countries like in Scandinavia using the Nordic model, which essentially combine free market capitalism with a welfare state.This significantly reduced poverty. If using that as supporting evidence is arguing based on emotion, then by all means I guess I argue based on emotion.

Take DPRK or China as an example - they're militaristic in upbringing, esp. NK; they believe fully in what they are taught, and you can't apply the "conscripts are worst soldiers" argument to them, it's not like the Persians drawing conscripts from across a vast empire with no real loyalty to them, it's like the Spartans raising their kids to be nationalist and prepared for war. If this society decides to war against a non-militaristic society, especially one with no obligation to turn up and fight due to the NAP, they will have a larger percentage of their population in their professional military, plus an entire trained population as backup (at least of the men).
Meanwhile in Ancapistan, you have a classic prisoner's dilemma - sure, it's be better for them as a group to all turn up and fight, but under no obligation, many will fail to show up out of fear, cowardice, bystander's syndrome, whatever it is. On top of this, the militia that did show up could not be as well trained, as for they would not be able to dedicate their lives to training like the aggressors.
As for contracting mercenaries, are you really going to be able to buy an army large enough to match an entire nation's? On top of this, who pays for them? What stops me from living in this society but not contributing to it in times like this?

their huge boost from the exploitation of natural resources worked out well in the short term
in the long term it made the populace passive to the influx of immigrants coming for the good life
now sweden is already at third world status
it wouldnt be guesswork to say it had something to do with the cooperation between a ethnically homogenous population rather than anything government did that allowed society to be good there

im sorry gross mistakes like this take away from the discussion
i cant tell right now if you are unable to grasp the NAP or intentionally misconstruing it to be something it is not
NAP is not about pacifism nor does it mean you cant use military force to defend yourself
if a military is encroaching on your neighborhood, the NAP has been violated

-many will
so youve already decided the outcome? whats the point of discussion here

you just said conscripts, no conscript known to modern times, or really in any age, trains their whole life to be military
you are setting up an impossible scenario
do you want a discussion or a "yes your imaginary fantasy would totally work out this way"
you might as well predict the weather and climate and make your own conclusions because you arent discussing here - you are claiming
and from where does this knowledge come? do you know men that wont fight for their life
did you not just describe an anarchist society
why would they be so passive as to not defend their freedom
how did they come to the anarchist society in the first place - did they just wish it? they clearly had to be aggressive about it and mindful of their freedoms
so your impossible scenario is negated for these reasons
if you want to have a discussion, do it in good will
dont tell me what is or what will happn if you want real world solutions to questions you have
if you arent curious (which your claims and statements of certainty suggest you already have your answers) then why these posts?
Your desire for freedom.

What leads you to the conclusion that Sweden's migrant problem is to do with the Nordic model? Germany, UK are having similar problems but do not operate on this model. If anything Ancap would be worse as you have to control over your borders. As for ethnic homogeneity, while it helps, I think you give it too much credit while blatantly dismissing government. Confirmation bias possibly?

What I was saying is that the militaristic society will force it's people to fight (conscription) whereas Ancapistan has no such mechanism as it violates the NAP, so will not produce as numerous a military.
Do you deny that there will be people choosing not to fight if not under some form of obligation?
I think military invasion is a very possible scenario, especially in an anarchic society, which is inherently fragile and just waiting for a more powerful neighbor to annex it.
I'm not saying most wouldn't, just that your numbers will be dwindled by pacifists who may otherwise be motivated to stay under threat of punishment in a militaristic society.
Yes, that's what we're discussing.
Because a militia vs. a professional military stands little chance - while you're running a business and training on the side, they are training all day and night - who do you think has the advantage?
Whose they? the people invading or being invaded?
How is it impossible to be invaded? the ME and Crimea all come to mind for recent examples, why would a society with no standing military not be a very good looking target?
I'm sorry you don't see military invasion as a legitimate concern, but for all of history it has been.
I'm presenting a legitimate scenario and describing what I believe will happen so that you have a claim to argue against, if i hadn't described what I see as likely to happen what would you argue against?
I am curious, I've thought about these scenarios myself and wanted to see how an ancap would defend against them.
A burning love for freedom is good to have in a time like what is being described, but it won't bring down a well trained and equipped military.