So, I remember when an user story timed the first few issues of this heaping pile of garbage. Anyway...

So, I remember when an user story timed the first few issues of this heaping pile of garbage. Anyway, I've been wanting to read something that would make me want to tear out my eyes and vomit up my entrails, I'm actually starting to ENJOY my anger!

So where can I read this without giving a cent to the cucks who made it?

Other urls found in this thread:

pompeiana.org/Resources/Ancient/Graffiti from Pompeii.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What was this even called, I could only stand like two or three issues before I just had to stop.

On top of the fact that it was all about teaching his daughter to be a racist, spoiled shit, the whole thing was full of inconsistencies. Like, why did the knights not know there was a dragon? How could she justify watching them all die? Why was anything the way it was, since nothing seemed to serve the story or make sense?

Because GRL POWER user! What are you some sort of misogynist?

It's Princeless by Jeremy Whitley, and it's absolute shit.

And yet it received two Eisner awards, just goes to show you what they're worth I suppose.

What the fuck is going with that thumbnail?

Interestingly enough, he's going to have a Marvel comic under his belt when The Unstoppable Wasp launches in October.

Is it still happening?

At the very least it's what I'd want from creators like this: a self contained thing that is original, and thus easy to ignore. It's not ruining something like Squirrel Girl or Hellcat, or making a book full of crazy person propaganda that doesn't fit with the overall shared universe. It's just a fucked up book that we don't have to even know about unless we want to get angry.

That said, is someone storytiming this shit again? It's like a test to see how far I can go. It's actually worse than that edgy furry book we talk about in the edge thread

HE'S WRITING THAT! Fuck.

Well, considering the first thing you see her do in the free comic day book is go inside Vision and fuck him up, I guess they chose him to writer her as a complete asshole, too. I guess if he makes her a complete cunt, it'll at least be an interesting trainwreck, unlike that Mockingbird book where she's just sort of a middle of the road bitch.

I think it's still going, but I think the original series is only 5 volumes. Now it's a different group of characters and a different artist. Whitley is still the writer though.

It's still very much a grill power series, and if the monthly sales figures from comichron are anything to go by, it's hanging on by a thread.

Sometimes I want to write a girl power thing and show them how it's done… but I guess I'm working on a lot of comics with female main characters so those will be seen as "girl power" no matter what I do.

user, they've had girl power shit done right for a long time now.
They deemed it sexist for a multitude of reasons, because women can only be portrayed as perfect and without fault.

I don't see female main characters or having a majority female cast would automatically make it fall under the "girl power" definition.

A lot of those types of stories are shit because they end up looking just like the ones about "Believing in the power of friendship!"

Princeless sucks because the message is so blatant and ham-fisted.

What is the message though? Because she clearly has no regard for human life. Is it just that women can be merciless killers just like their fathers?


Wish we could just have a real version of Jem back. No drastic changes like the comics, no complete hollow cash grabs on the cheap like the movie… just Jem. But no one seems to be able to give me that again.

The part I'm talking about is the fact that Whitley's trying to flip the whole damsel in distress trope on its head. The problem is his writing makes it glaringly obvious.

The other problem I have with this series is that they couldn't seem to pin down a specific art style. It's like they changed artists for every volume.

Some of the covers for the original story and the Pirate Princess run don't fill me with confidence either.

It could've easily been better with a bit more subtlety in my opinion.

Does this douchebag even know what real art is?
Or what comics were in their golden ages? What a fucking ass.

Why would he even try for a pirate book with a female lead if you can tell just from the cover that it's infinitely inferior to El Cazador? Which I do need to get back on reading someday, stopped at issue 6 due to just not going to the comic shop in years.

I am no historian, maybe it's not even Earth in that book… I don't know. But did they have WALLETS in the pirate days? Did people actually have very modern looking pants and wallets, where they kept paper money? Wasn't everything like coin pouches and shit, or am I totally wrong?

Me too, but I think that the movie has stopped any chance of that happening. At least there's still the original cartoon.

Well, that's not the only issue. The headline reads, "Ladies! Liberate your enemies treasures," yet they're just pickpocketing some random dude.

So that's your enemy? People minding their own business? Not, say, the various governments of the era? The ones who actually hold wealth and power?

From what I read from the other storytime, the writer does seem like the type to think that petty theft of random people is "empowering".


True, and it's the only of the old Sunbow stuff still on Netflix. I do still watch it from time to time, but I'd also love if G.I.Joe and Transformers were on there again. And of course mutha fucking INHUMANOIDS!

I'm guessing he took the playbook from the tumblr "lift culture" freaks, didn't he?

Man, i remember how badly that pissed off /fit/ for even daring likening their never-ending self-improvement mania to petty smug thievery and giving "lifting" a bad name.

Why'd they get taken off in the first place? Hasbro being jews?

Probably. Whatever deal they had with Netflix ended for those shows, either to push DVD sales or push the newer shows (Robots in Disguise and Prime are on Netflix, I think). Possible they took all G.I.Joe stuff down so people are extra starved for them by the time the new cartoon comes around.

...

I'm not comparing them, you fucking autist. I'm using both as an example of why someone's a retard if they cry about 'bringing the artform down' by having tits.
Also, even if you wanna compare them, it's not that different. The female form has always been the most used in art, because it's just physically nice to look at.

Don't kid yourself if you think these artists from hundreds of years ago weren't going 'lol boobies!' too. What was the name of that artist that was salty because he loved the naked ladies he drew so much, but then he got married and saw how hairy they were in person?

The pose is more graceful and there's no emphasis on having huge knockers or cleavage. Also there's tonnes of old artwork of naked men or pics that have everyone naked in them (like paintings depicting hell). Does mean all those artists were gay/bi?

Are you gonna claim all those naked statues were made to get people's rocks off?

Men in art in that era had such tiny cocks and were so hairless because they were based on pre-pubescent boys. Boys they fucked, because they were a bunch of pedophiles. Which is why we have artists like Michelangelo, who made shit like pic related, because he didn't have any interest in the female form because he was so damn gay, so he just modeled a female sculpture after a hot guy and just threw some tits on it.

No, and Red Sonja comics weren't made to get people's rocks off, either. That's why it wasn't straight porn and had a story to it.

Bayonetta must be pretty wholesome by your standards.

I wasn't saying something can't be fapbait, I'm saying it just wasn't the intended purpose. Are you really this much of a dumbass?
Unless you think Kamiya made Bayo with the distinct purpose of having everyone jack off during it. That's why the game's so damn hard and takes two hands and all your focus to play, right.

And I wasn't saying that a character being fapbait doesn't mean the work there in has no substance. It just means stop pretending there character's design is a 2deep4u artistic statement.

The whole reason I brought this up is because you implied having f-cups and bikinis on the front of comics is "just like the famous paintings!".

Except I never said that Sonja's character design was meant to be deep.
And I never compared the two pieces of art.
You're just an autist that doesn't have reading comprehension. They pretend that the naked form of a woman is somehow demeaning, even though that's always been the subject of the most famous pieces of art for hundreds of years.
And then I used Red Sonja to say that this is what comics have always been, especially in their golden days when comics were at their absolute best.

Though you're a retard if you think that naked girls in art from 300 years ago is any different from naked girls in art from 30 years ago. I think your stupid worldview will be broken by taking a look at the graffiti found in Pompeii.
pompeiana.org/Resources/Ancient/Graffiti from Pompeii.htm

Some highlights:
People hundreds of years ago are the same pieces of shit that they are now.
Just because the sculptures had graceful poses does not make them more meaningful. And it's not as if nudity was considered more common back then. Both in Renaissance times and in Roman or Greek times. Shit, Spartan women would run around in tiny miniskirts and would wrestle naked, and the rest of Greece was outraged by it.

The only difference is the level of artistry. And even then, both the examples I used (that were not compared to each other, but to the fucking stupid cover I was bitching about) are leagues above Princessless's cover artistically.

What the fuck happened to this thread in the last hour?

Some autist got made because they can't read shit.
I'd like to get back on track to bitching about this terrible comic, but that'd be easier to do if someone wanted to take the bullet and storytime this piece of shit.