Is this a good movie despite being feminist propaganda?

fembots, no real womyn

AVA WAS REAL TO ME

How exactly this is feminist propaganda?

cant be all that feminist with a robo badonkadonk like that on the cover

It doesn't say women are mentally children built by God himself to suck dick and breed children.

...

If the doors were programmed to unlock when the power went out and the lights went red, how was the beta cuck still locked in at the end? And what kind of idiot doesn't run out of the room and away when they know 1. that two robots just killed another person and 2. there is a helicopter coming soon.
Good concept, but too many loose ends and sloppy story telling to wrap up.

I thought Ava changed the code. Been a bit since I've seen it so I could be wrong
Anyways it was a good movie.

asian/caucasian waifu sex bot the movie.

Try harder

I don't know, seems like """they""" wouldn't like that, as it shows men getting what they want out of a woman.

I thought it was anti-feminist. Create an artificial woman thay seems perfecy and she still ends up as a bitch.

I never watched it because I couldn't suspend disbelief.

You know immediately just from that alone it was written either by women, a faggot, or a beta male. Don't believe me? We have "sexbots" already, they're called realdolls. Yes, there are specialty models made to look like children, but what do their best sellers look like?

They look like this, faggots.

It was stated that the robot was designed to fit the main character's homo pedophile taste.

Do they specify outright that he's a pedophile?

...

No, but he is quick to notice the supposed influences to the design.

That seems like what would happen if you mixed little boys and some vanilla porn actors.

Cow utters are the worst, get out of here with your shit taste.

We've gone over this, pedo. Your view is in the minority, and I can give you a laundry list of reasons your taste is in fact shit and definitive evidence you're a genetic dud. All you can come back with is repeating yourself, and posting ages old panels from doujins written specifically for pedophiles. You lost this argument before you started it, please don't make me waste the time it would take to rub your retardation in your face again.

The only people who like giiant bags of fat sloshing around like that are people who are mentally defective with mommy issues out the ass. You probably jerk off every time mommy comes to tell you to clean your room. Fucking disgusting, grow up loser.

...

0/10, but fine. We'll go through it.

-Humans are the only mammals where the mammary gland remains swollen when not producing milk, this is because their secondary function is to demonstrate sexual maturity. It's giving your brain signals she's fertile and ready to fuck. The larger they are the more fertile, the more ready, the more feminine she is. By definition if you prefer smaller breasts, you prefer less feminine, less developed physical forms. You're a pedophile or a faggot, plain and simple.

-Sexual selection as well as every poll in history has shown men prefer larger breasts. Bra sizes have increased along with penis sizes over time due to mate selection, worldwide average is currently D and it's only increasing.

-Pedophiles opinions are further made worthless by study after study showing they have higher rates of retardation, autism, and for some reason left-handedness, along with lower IQs. I've seen pedophiles try to "reason" their way out of these findings by saying "That's bullshit, that's just the ones that got caught!" of course they're usually doing this while demonstrating how profoundly retarded they are by outing themselves as a pedophile on the internet, and that they don't understand how studies or averages work.

-Further, terms like "bags of fat" "cow udders" and so on suggest that ironically, the pedophile has deep issues both with women and with their own mother, and that they stopped emotionally maturing before puberty.

tl;dr: You one dumb pedo-faggot, and ain't nothing you can say that will change that, dweeb.

...

I'm into flat-chest, but I do love big breasts as well. Being disgusted by big breasts is gay and low testosterone.

NATHAN DID NOTHING WRONG

"jews dindu nuffin"

Because women are getting fatter.

I bet you are one of those jealous fags that call every woman with curves fat.

When the subject is literally a popularity contest, then yes. Your statement was that the taste is "shit" but the people who share your view are by definition retarded, and mentally ill.

I can say that yes, according to every study most men prefer bigger breasts. You're making the tumblr argument, 99.997% of the population is "cis", 97% is heterosexual, 90% isn't black, but they want everything built to cater to gay, black trannies.

Most people don't feel the need to amputate their limbs.

Nope, they're going up in countries where obesity rates are stable or even going down. I'll be candid with you, my personal explanation (because Japan is one of the countries experiencing a bust boom, but obesity rates are not increasing) is that part of it has to do with nourishment. Most of the countries with averages of A are areas known for malnourishment and starvation, as they gain access to food, bra size goes up. But even if you take it individually, the US, every country in Europe, generally speaking they're going up everywhere.

Depends on what you mean by "curves"
) ( not ( )

This is the tier we are talking about.

chubby is ok

...

said chubby not curvy.

the point of nathan having her was that he treats her like shit. for the first half or so of the movie, as far as caleb knows, she is a real person. he sees nathan treating her with no human dignity or respect, and basically like a stockholm syndrome afflicted slave and nathan says and does nothing about it.
how you perceive it, i don't care. the point is that feminists would consider the way nathan treats kyoko to be extremely misogynistic.

this is the same old same old shit about how men "objectify" women and don't do anything when they're being mistreated. the reason why nathan is the way that he is, while caleb sees it and thinks nothing of it, is because they think this behavior is shitty and they think every man who isn't a feminist is like this. caleb and nathan are strawmen.

if you cannot see that this movie does not promote sexbots as a good idea, and portrays any man who wants them as a misogynist, then you are as retarded as someone who doesn't recognize that starship troopers is satire of authoritarian propaganda , rather than actual authoritarian propaganda.

basically the point i'm making is that it doesn't matter how much you like the movie. it doesn't matter how retarded and incapable of reading between the lines you are. it doesn't matter that you're too lazy to do 5 minutes of research about the political leanings of the writer/director. the point is it was made by an sjw cuck to push a cuck narrative. it has massive underlying feminist undertones. if you deny this after doing even a modicum of research to find out what the guy who made it intended for it to be about, then you are patently retarded.

from the article i posted earlier

alex garland (writer/director of ex machina)- “The patriarchy — which is a buzzword at the moment, for all sorts of completely good reasons — does not interest me,” he replied, “because I'm not interested in things that, to me, feel self-evident. Yes, I get that it exists. It's like the objectification of girls in their early 20s: Yes, I get it, it happens.”

alex garland- "I could tailor it to the patriarchy, but I'm personally not interested in it. That's not a straight guy dodging a bullet … [the patriarchy is] fucking there. We could spend a while talking about it, but at the end of it, we'd both just agree that it's there.”

alex garland- " “I would argue that if you reverse the genders in this film, you'd have a misogynistic movie. Imagine it, picture it in your mind: You have two women creating, imprisoning these male-seeming machines, and doing all the things that the guys do in the reverse example. I would expect that it could read as misogyny in the way that this incarnation could be read as misandry.”

he is acknowledging, in plain english, that this movie is misandrist

...

Right, you did take time to write it so i'll answer it. You seem to be focusing on the SJW narrative/plot but in reality normies zombies or the bovine mass cannot properly digest these things. To them, yes its about an evil man and all, but calling it flat out a feminist movie? you are missing the forest for the trees here.

Normies see a skinny cunt and asian cunt, normies see AI bad cause AI go bad, normies cant even understand most of the behavioural-pattern analysis in the movie. sure the liberal media can push it but it wont work, its not on Mad Max Fury Road or Star Wars level of SJW so relax.

Its essentially about a woman exploiting beta males to get back at daddy and then leave them in her wake as she enters the real world, independent and her own woman.

Shit movie.

Pretty much went with the cliche "AI turns against the humans" route, but shown in a more pretentious and drawn out way. Them using their manufactured sexuality against men is also nothing new.

This guy pretty much sums up how it can't really be or shouldn't even be considered "feminist propaganda". Fembots are literally objects made to look and act in a certain way.

If anything, it's a movie about how even the best programmers are assholes, can be stupid at programming and how easy it is for them to fuck each other's projects up if they barely even try to.

delete that

Did you know that the prequels are a feminist movie and that nightmare in elm street talk about gender equality?

see