Mainstream socio-economic policy (at least in part) derives from late 19th century and post WWII conservatives

Mainstream socio-economic policy (at least in part) derives from late 19th century and post WWII conservatives.
Neoliberalism, as practiced to some extent by the Clinton Administration, has it's historical roots in the right as well. Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, the Chicago Boys, Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher etc. etc.
Why does Holla Forums believe that mainstream academics is dominated by "cultural Marxism" when so much of it's socio-economic influence comes from conservative capitalists?

Fuck off Holla Forums

Oh you mean Trotskyists? Nice try buddy. There is more to life than economics you Red materialist shitter.

...

...

Why should I? You're the one that came here to our board and created a shitty slide thread, I don't come here to talk with kikes.

I see. This board is supposed to be a hugbox and not a place of rational discussion.

The "at least in part" is carrying an insane amount of weight in that sentence.


By our modern view of left and right it does, but in reality, no, it doesn't. A political ideology with its roots in the right would have evolved from things like monarchism and traditionalism; not egalitarianism and democracy.


Because those people you're referring to aren't actually conservatives. The Democratic and Republican parties are left wing parties which are dominated by globalists.


Oh please. At if you're going to complain, at least come up with better arguments.

...

"Neoliberal" usually means "someone that I dislike very much who isn't as socialist as me".

Neoliberals run the economics while leftists have control of entertainment and education.

It's a twisted mix of both at least in the west

You know people here generally oppose both communism and any form of liberalism

This.

"Cultural Marxism" is cultural, obviously. The point of it is to create people who will be open to socialism. It has been quite successful if we look at the amount f the younger generation going nuts for Bernie the kike.

Well, actually, the primary goal of cultural Marxism is anti-fascism. It's because Marxists learned in the 20th century that socialism is not the next phase of the material dialectic as Marx believed, but fascism is.

So now the Marxists are acting as the reactionaries, trying to hold back the material progress towards fascism.

Rekt

We don't, we blame the Jews.

Sure, because nothing matters outside of Communism, so when a community refuses to engage with communists they are automatically a hugbox, because we can imagine other subjects to talk about!!!

Oh hi Holla Forums

You aren't even trying to bring rational discussion to the table so you can't make that determination :^)

Forget it, OP just came here so he could talk smug to the first person who didn't feel like engaging him.

I find it almost cute how quaint Holla Forums's notion is of what constitutes the right-wing. One of the most basic realizations Holla Forumsaks have is that the "conservative" party in America for a long time has been nothing other than controlled opposition for the liberals and as you've pointed out, both work towards globalist ends. I mean hell, I've long believed that many people who consider themselves conservative voted for rebublicans simply because there was no better choice while leftards like OP act like the republican policies are the exact things conservative voters have wanted. The huge amount of voters who turned out for Trump, somebody actually offering policies many "conservative" voters have been begging for decades, in addition to the rebublican establishment's fierce opposition to his campaign is testament to this.

...