Gays aren't good for the white nationalist movement at the end of the day...

Umm. Most black gays are being fucked and ran through by white nationalists. Disgusting as it may be, this is what happens when you let gays in.

Where did you get that from? Your asshole?

My own two eyes actually. Threw up a bit as well.

If only gays realized that following lock step with leftit agenda only destroys the white and black straight males they love so much.

LGBTAQQOIJAOIJQTFG++ culture encourages gay men to bottom. The whole culture is infiltrated by SJWs and radical leftists who want to emasculate men.

No self respecting white gay will fuck a mud or fuck another white that fucked a mud.

This is why (((milo))) isn't based at all.

imgur.com/a/0Ncd9

Nope

Yep. Fuck you, queerlover.

Milo is disgusting kike. He's not white. So he can get pozzed.

Stop being a faggot, OP.

I successfully convinced all my female friends to vote for Trump in the primaries. I'm not completely useless.

I'm gay. I'm here because I'm strong enough as a person to rise above my base urges and address the real problems of the world. I have already accepted that I will hang on the DotR, I just pray you guys will give me a chance to beat up some rabbis first. I hate them for mutilating me and for corrupting the world with their marxist evil.

I can confirm that almost every single gay man is a bottom. This is because of the leftist propaganda that encourages weakness and the reversal of gender roles. I will admit, I used to be a bottom back when I was a teenager, and I even had unprotected sex with a random nignog I met online. Knowing what I know now, it's a fucking miracle I didn't come away from that lip-smacking gibsmedat aids vector without any kind of damage, that had to have been equivalent to at least quads.

However, I am a dominant top now. I am working hard to do well in school, avoiding Jewish drugs in my food, and acting like a fucking man whenever possible. I am taking charge of my life, exactly as the merchants fear, and that confidence got me into the man's position in the bedroom.

I really can't say whether I'm mentally ill or not. Is narcissism a mental illness? Apathy, introversion? If so, 99.99% of all human beings are "mentally ill", and that's a good thing, because if we were all exactly the same the world would be a fucking horrible place to live. That's exactly the same reason why we fight racemixing. Is homosexuality a natural and necessary inhibitor of overpopulation, or is it degeneracy fueled by kike propaganda? Or maybe both? I really don't know where the programming ends and the natural order begins. I feel like Holla Forums hasn't thought this through enough.

That being said, I still get the urges, occasionally. The urge to act and dress like a total submissive faggot. The urge to suck nigger dick. I can't help it, they come on to me like a plague. I just keep fighting on through the days.

You are definitionally mentally ill. If you recognize that being a faggot is wrong, stop being a faggot. You weren’t born that way.

Let us dissect the delusional phrase, “homosexuality is not a choice.”
First, we must establish some axioms and definitions.
– One is mentally ill if one is psychologically incapable of refraining from a biologically non-necessity activity or desire.
– Biologically necessary activities or desires are those without which a species cannot perpetuate itself through generations: e.g., procurement and consumption of resources, expurgation of waste, survival to sexual maturity, sexual reproduction, and education of the young.
– Desires are either biological or psychological in character; they are distinguished according to whether the desire leads toward a biologically necessary or biologically non-necessary activity.
– Desires are either innate or habitual. Habitual desires are acquired desires. Consider an example: A person who has never had alcohol cannot desire to drink alcohol for alcohol’s sake, but only for some other sake, e.g., acceptance in a peer group. Further, a person who has not acquired a refined taste for scotch through frequent consumption thereof cannot desire to drink Oban for Oban’s sake, but only for the sake of scotch in general, for curiosity, or for something else. Therefore, habitual desires are the result of certain activities. Innate desires, however, are not.
– Homosexual desires are by the former definitions not biological desires.
– The meaning of other terms are taken from their accepted use in ordinary discourse.
– One is a homosexual if and only if one either 1) engages in homosexual activity, 2) has homosexual desires, or 3) has homosexual desires and engages in homosexual activity.
With these laid down, what follows is all possible propositions.
If (1): One engages in homosexual activity either A) voluntarily or B) involuntarily,
(1.A): One chooses to be homosexual, and homosexuality is a choice.
(1.B): One is compelled to engage either i) psychologically or ii) physically, by another, and homosexuality is not a choice.
(1.B.i): One is mentally ill, by the definition of mental illness.
If (2): One desires homosexuality either A) innately or B) habitually,
(2.B): One has acquired homosexual desires through homosexual activity. If one acquires these involuntarily through involuntary engagement in homosexual activity, one is either coerced by another or one is mentally ill. Otherwise homosexuality is a choice.
(2.A): One is either i) able to refrain from satisfying these innate homosexual desires or ii) unable to refrain.
(2.A.i): One chooses to be homosexual, and homosexuality is a choice.
(2.A.ii): One is mentally ill, by the definition of mental illness.
If (3): One either chooses to be homosexual or homosexuality is a mental illness.

Therefore, homosexuals are mentally ill if and only if they do not choose to be homosexual and are not physically compelled by another to engage in homosexual activities. However, that is not the end of the discussion. Homosexuality, as a group of behaviors, is inherently self-destructive and causes self-harm. Homosexuality, as a group of behaviors, is statistically one of the most self-harmful. Willful pursuit or practice of a behavior–or group of behaviors–that is inherently self-harmful is mental illness. Thus, all homosexuals are, definitionally, mentally ill.
Liberals have this ridiculous notion that homosexuality is state of being, instead of a form of behavior that arises from a state of being.

Islam is gay as fuck though… They fuck boys and it's not considered sex

This.
As soon as Milo outgrows his usefulness, he's getting thrown out of a fucking helicopter.

You faggot lovers wont listen to me but

AltRight = MGTOW 2.0

Mark my swords.
MGTOW has a lot of money behind it and wanted to prevent white DNA from spreading by going after the Alpha Male pick up artist scene, then attaching itself to /christian/ and eventually Holla Forums. The Alt-Right goes after Feminism because of gammer gate, and found it's way to Holla Forums through e-celebs and Trump. Jews lead all revolutions against them

Ultimately homosexuality is a choice.

You may not feel like you chose to like da dick but you choose to give in to those desires.

Every man you fuck is a choice. You choose to be a degenerate.

At the end of the day I don't deny the experiences of gays/trannys/pedos/whateverfetish… to me they are all one in the same. The desires are real. But the actions are all choices.

The real issue is how society decides to encourage or discourage these desires. Right now in this social climate, you are encouraged to act on these desires with impunity.

But please understand this isn't because you are in the right, but because it's part of a global agenda to end all that is decent. It's human self-destruction. What you are doing is just taking advantage of the situation much like a nigger looting during a chimpout.

TL;DR Stop making excuses for yourself.

t. fellow homosexual

I'm tired of Holla Forums saying homosexuality is degenerate. Exclusive homosexuality was practiced for the longest time in Greece. To say homosexuality is degenerate is to say a tenant of white culture is degenerate.

Faggotry is white. End of discussion.

Faggots are a Christian Semitic invention. Greeks looked down on acting like a fucking faggot.
Sex is just sex. Morality was the bedrock of Greece and Rome until it fell about and Christian mudskins took over.

A lot of the idea of Greek and Roman “acceptance” of homosexuality has been blown out of proportion by A. early Christians who wanted to make the Greeks look degenerate by their standards, and B. 20th century theorists who see two naked figures on a pot and describe it as eroticism even if they are fighting. The pots which did represent actual gay sex–censored by intercrucial depictions–are few. And does the existence of homosexual pornography tell us the society as a whole generally thought homosexuality was natural and good? Of course not.
Then there’s the whole term pederasty and what we translate as “lover.” If pederasty was about sex, then why was admiring boys in a sexual way frowned upon? We know there were prohibitions of this. It seems that what we translate as “lover” should more likely be translated as “teacher.”
There's also no real evidence that Alexander the Great was gay. All we have is his extremely close friendship with Hephaestion and one event where he kissed a eunuch, whom the crowd shouted for him to kiss. And there’s also another account of people lining up to be kissed by Alexander, so this may have been a tribute thing.
Here is the account:
Plutarch’s Life of Alexander 67.4
“We are told, too, that he was once viewing some contests in singing and dancing, being well heated with wine, and that his favorite, Bagoas, won the prize for song and dance, and then, all in his festal array, passed through the theater and took his seat by Alexander’s side; at sight of which the Macedonians clapped their hands and loudly bade the king kiss the victor, until at last he threw his arms about him and kissed him tenderly.”
So, yeah, probably not a gay thing anymore than a European noble kissing the king’s finger or French and Italians kissing each other’s cheeks. We also know that Alexander’s parents feared for his sexuality early on. Among hundreds of quotes that could be presented, one of the most interesting comes from Athenaeus of Naucratis and his “The Deipnosophists” (X. 45).
“And Hieronymus, in his “Letters”, says that Theophrastus says that Alexander was not open to ‘bodily pleasures’; and accordingly, when Olympian had given him Callixene, a Thessaian courtesan, for a mistress , who was a most beautiful woman, and all this was done with the concept of Philip, [for they were afraid that he would become effeminate], she was constantly obliged to ask him herself to do his duty by her.”
I “wonder” what the context of “effeminate” might be in a passage in which his parents, worried about his lack of desire, are hiring a female prostitute for him. Alexander would later go on to have recorded sexual relationships with women, yet the only proof of any with men is that he had a really really close friend, and that a crowd told him to kiss a eunuch once. That's it. Time and again, that’s how Greek life is reinterpreted. Early Christians made the Greeks gay to shame the pagans and later intellectuals enthusiastically embraced this narrative by cherrypicking sources.

~:~

Sodomy–the modern definition of anal sex rather than the Middle Ages’ of bestiality, et. al.–was punishable by death in most of the city-states of Greece. Pederasty was institutional in some cases (Sparta and Thebes), but penetrative sex was not. And in Athens, the openly homosexual could not own property, and, by extension, vote or serve in a public office.
In Rome, homosexuality was considered a vice. You were technically allowed to sodomize a male slave, but doing so would be looked at as a “decadent Greek practice.” Though the openly homosexual could own property, they could not hold office or military rank. Homosexual activity of any type with a fellow citizen meant that you would be cast out of social circles. Receiving sodomy was a crime punished by revocation of property, and, by extension, rights of citizenship. In some Providences, it was punished by death or exile.
Now let’s compare that to Middle Ages Europe. The punishment for sodomy? A fine, or a five year sentence if you were unable to pay the fine. Sodomy was not punished by death, though you could be cast out of the priesthood for it. They could not revoke property or noble status for the discovery of homosexual activity. This had to do with the philosophy of the time. Homosexuality and sodomy (homosexual or otherwise) was seen as the logical extension of uncontrolled lust–the desire for sex without reproductive function. By their philosophy, anyone had the potential to become a sodomite. As such, the punishments were lenient compared to Rome or Greece. Only certain groups within society–like certain nobles who under Roman law were literately above the common law–could do this without consequences.

REPORTED FOR PAID SHILL

It's societies attitudes towards homosexuality that are degenerate.

Gays will always be around. But encouraging a "culture" and imposing state policies to it's benefit has to fucking go.

Faggots checked out of gene pool. We don't need to include them. Straights don't owe them anything.
Nope. We need to stop rewarding this behavior. This is a huge problem.

Found the anti-white kikes. Go back to diddling little girls degenerate rats. Leave our Aryan sexual culture alone.

Are you serious?

This is bait isn't it…

You don't really know what you're talking about. Alfred Rosenberg, Hitler, and the NSDAP recognized feminism as a tentacle of the kike marxist agenda. It breaks down the family, promotes race mixing and faggotry, I don't need to explain it. I agree, we shouldn't be used as a tool of the "altright." But we also shouldn't give up the war against everything marxist and commie. The war for our minds that has been raging for over a century.

Strength and will. 14/88

Are you so new that you can’t tell? Report the faggot.

There are a few flaws with your argument. This is probably a homemade copypasta that has thus far gone unchallenged because it is extremely TL;DR. but I'll dig into it.

This is just a minor error, but this is not a perfect definition. Schitzophrenics do not experience any "activity" or "desire"; hallucinations come to them without any active input on their part. I would add "or sensort input". This would also cover those faggy "indigo children" and other hippie shit.

But the greater issue here, is that under your very own definition, all the highly common and perfectly accepted psychological characteristics that I listed would be classified as "mentally ill".

Narcissism is debateable. Putting #1 first is the most direct path to survival, but it goes against human biological programming as a societal species.

Apathy would most certainly be a mental illness. Not wanting to do anything goes against the ability to survive and reproduce and therefore goes against biological fitness.

Introversion would definitely be a mental illness. Why would one have a higher biological fitness by losing energy from social interaction than by gaining energy from it? Or one could argue that drawing energy from loneliness is more fit for surviving independently, in which case extroversion has to be a mental illness. In a binary case like this, one of them has to be inferior.

So this begs the question, which you didn't address, is whether every variation in human behavior is some form of degeneracy. We should be different to some degree, for that's how we got the unique cultures of places like France, Germany, etc. So is there a cutoff limit for how much we can go against biological order before it becomes mental illness? Is homosexuality inherently beyond that border? After all, I did explain its use as a natural guard against overpopulation. This is the issue that I feel like Holla Forums hasn't really fairly addressed in depth.

Your definition of a "biologically necessary activity" is fine for lower-order organisms that don't have any complex emotion to speak of, but as the size of the brain increases, as it does in the great apes, humans, whales and the like, emotional health becomes a factor of survival, as it is the barrier against a wide variety of mental illnesses. As you can see by pic related, love/belonging is one of the most critical tiers of health beyond basic physical needs. Homosexuals merely satisfy that need by having intercourse with the same sex. Therefore, homosexuality falls within the guidelines of a biological necessity for all species dependent on emotional health.

So? Procreation is a problem right now, not a solution. Humanity will not be able to perpetuate itself if it dies of starvation. Homosexuality aids population growth by ensuring that the rate of growth does not surpass the threshold that the environment can support.

Homosexuality can be avoided. Engaging in it is a choice. There is no other argument to be made. Anything in defense of homosexuality is akin to saying shooting up krokodil should be praised and everyone with missing limbs should be patted on the back for being so courageous for destroying themselves.

You’re off to a great start.
And as they perceive these hallucinations as reality, they are mentally ill.
Okay. And? Apathy and narcissism are not accepted. Nor is overt introversion.
The document is about faggots. The axioms can simply be applied to other behaviors. It’s neither the responsibility nor the purpose of the document to address all possible behaviors.
By definition of its actions, yes.
Acting on a hallucination, rather than on reality. Already defined as mental illness.
I can certainly see that you ARE a faggot, because only someone mentally ill could believe this is a logical conclusion. Environments balance themselves.

You're going in the bog last for making my sides explode.

I do t see anything funny about this troll thread.

That's all well defined but where's the part where it explains his urges to suck on AIDS?