Do women even have to deal with being a virgin at 30?

what do you not understand?

he feels bad for her because of how she looks.

she is 3DPD, so she'll find poor beta to fuck her
She might not be happy with him because of hypergamy, but that is not reason to feel sorry for her.
Can't imagine what you're going to feel when sexbots come out.

are you mentally deficient?

she is disgusting. a 0/10. whether or not someone has come to terms with their appearance does not mean they have any self esteem about it. if you looked like her, you would find yourself disgusting. we can imagine what it would be like in a situation like that, it's called empathy

sexbots have nothing at all to do with this you just wanted to bring them up

If they're too fat and ugly, of course they'll remain a virgin. Unless someone is really desperate enough to fuck them, like this black friend that I have, he's always down to have sex with fat ugly women no matter what age…so I guess it's a non-existent problem for women.

Thought you were talking about her not being able to find a partner, thus I was saying that when sexbots come out many women won't be able to find a man to give them so much as a second glance, so you might feel bad for them when that comes around.

Don't really know why you would feel bad for someone with low self esteem.
If she finds herself disgusting, she could just avoid people, as to not feel the consequences of people finding her disgusting.
People care about their looks, because they care about other people's judgements.

...

Without doubt the biggest faggot I've seen on 8ch today, and I even went in the brony thread to shitpost.

Yeah that must do wonders for one's self esteem.
What you should say is if she finds herself disgusting she should fucking do something about it, up to and including throwing money at the wall reconstructing herself, which is honestly the only option available to her.

You should really really kill yourself.

Think attractive women live in a different reality than us.
They can just sit there and be handed money, and pick men best on their facial structure.

I think you're overstating it. I think that even if there was a government program to give a sexbot to every person who wants one, there will still be more men looking for sex than there are women looking for sex. And there will always be men looking who have no hope of finding.

The reason I think this is that sex with a bot (much like a hooker) is a bit like playing a single-player game. You beat it (much like a hooker) but it's not fullfilling. Playing a real live person feels different, even if the gameplay is basically the same. I think it's going to be the same with sexbots. They'll be better than nothing - but then, the porn we have today is better than nothing, and I can imagine people having this same conversation before the age of internet porn: "dude, once there's high-res porn for free, women wont be able to find a man!!" but that didn't happen, did it?

So yeah, I think that even when we have sexbots you'll want to go out and find a real girl.

Short of an old-school world war, you will never see a situation were women are at a disadvantage on the sexual market. And if there was a world war, you'd die so …lose::lose

What if it is the other way around my friend?

Or worse, sexbots decide they don't like either of us.

wtf is wrong with you people. Why the fuck do you care if you ever have sex

Women want romance, and I suppose that you could make a robot that understands her and talks about her feelings, but she'll still know that it's a machine.

Even with guys, prostitution and fleshlights don't seem to have done much to even the field, so I don't think sexbots will either. It will be seen as a waste of money and an admission that you're too worthless to attract a real girl

The real thing that levels the field is stuff like tinder. Guys can meet up with sexually active girls, so promiscuous girls aren't in as short supply, since it's now easier to find them.

While you have a point, I think once you get a good degree of customization in both hardware and software, you'll have plenty of people who would be plenty happy with their waifus. It's a whole different thing from regular porn. I mean we might not be there yet, but at a certain point, who is to say a highly advanced AI isn't just a very retarded person?

I think we're already past the point where sophisticated AI is already more human-like than the most retarded human

Honestly, losing your virginity is overrated because you'll possibly end up preferring masturbation anyway or you'll end up like those pathetic normalcunts who can't go a week without sex otherwise they get migranes or whatever.

Obviously there are a few 30-year-old female virgins, but most either they chose that life (nuns and such) or else they have some type of mental or physical disability.

I seriously doubt there are more than a vanishingly small group of women who are basically normal, want sex, and can't get it. The closest I could imagine is a case of excessively high standards ("I'm too good for anyone who will have me"), which, to be fair, probably applies to some men who claim they can't get laid too.

Virginity at any age is not a problem for women. Any woman could get laid in under an hour if she only tried.

Talking about highly sophisticated sexbots, that have AI that is capable of learning, meaning it able to learn what you like, so if you like conflict, it will give you conflict. If you get bored, then it'll test new things out, to see what you like.

I can't believe you compared porn to sexbots, you can't touch porn, maybe I am wrong, and VR will be the thing that disadvantage women, only time will tell, but one thing is sure, technology has a pronoun effect on how the sexes interact with each other.

>So yeah, I think that even when we have sexbots you'll want to go out and find a real girl.
I don't want to find a 3DPD without sexbots, so I doubt that will change with sexbots.

Unlikely, since women are hypergamous, meaning the bots will never be good enough, plus the sexbots that women will take over a real man has to be able to earn money, and no company is ever going to hire bots, when they can buy them.

Well, you can compare anything. That's how we learn.

Look, you know how T-Rex had tiny little arms right? Imagine a society just like ours except that for some reason, males cannot masturbate. Is it really so hard for you to imagine that the males in that society would say, "wow, if only I could masturbate, then I wouldn't bother with women at all!"

You know how dogs can lick their own dicks, right? Surely you've heard guys say, "wow, if I could give myself head, I wouldn't bother with women at all!"

Imagine a world with no porn at all. If you went to that world and showed them all the porn on your iphone, and you told them about your giant computer monitor and whatever - don't you think they would say the same thing? They'd look around at the average women available to them vs. the endless variety of perfect 10's that you get to jerk to and they'd say, "wow, if I had all that porn, I wouldn't bother with women at all!"

So now here we are on the precipice of a change. You've seen pics of sex dolls and you're imagine sex bots. And you're saying the same thing that all three of the examples I gave said. You're *imagining* that once you get this one extra thing, you wont need women.

I disagree.

I even have one more argument to prove my point, and it's this: rich guys always seem to get married. They have what amounts to a perfect sexbot - they have hot prostitutes that they can afford to pay to do whatever they want them to do. Yet even then, they still want a woman that (they believe) they aren't paying for.

The kind of sexbots I am talking about is on an entirely different level then porn. Porn is just a pic or a video, something for you to project onto, and give you ideas for fap fuel, it isn't something you and touch, or being touched by. It isn't something you can talk to, and have stimulating interactions with. It isn't something that can be submissive or dominating in the bed, or in your life.
Porn doesn't have the capability to disadvantage women, because it isn't something you can love. It is simply there to help you fap. Sexbots on the other hand are something you can love. You can touch them, you can talk to them, go on dates, be nice to and have it reciprocated.

Feedback is the keyword, and there isn't any feedback with porn.

rich people get married for different reasons then normal people, they get married for opportunities to make more money by combining the wealth of their family, and for social prestige, and this isn't really about marriage.