What did he mean by this?

I love Donnie and all but…
why is this on Holla Forums

God fucking bless.

I'm glad Trump will be nothing more than a 4 year detour into nonsense and the last gasp of a dying majority voting bloc destined to wither into irrelevance. It's always sweetest to crush your enemies when they have a last gasp of hope.

News related to TV stations is Holla Forums

...

...

I want CNN to crash and burn.

...

Shouldn't you have killer yourself already nigger?

I'm not sure the protesters know their protests don't do anything.
What do they think they'll achieve?

the resignation of Trump, the end of austerity (that hasn't even begun yet) and the end of capitalism, because that's working out so well in Venezuela right now

wtf i love drumpf now

Current Year Man's report was actually wrong, DJT's grandfather's name was "Trumpf", not "Drumpf", the latter was just an occasional alternative spelling

I WIIL UNLEASH WRATH UPON YOU!!! You motherfuker

Wtf will I listen to on my way to work and back you peice of shit. We are entering a dictatorship people!!!

Send help anyone!!!

Retweets. Come on son could of figured that one out

I'm shocked

Huge victories on the horizon already.

I can't wait for a gofundme to get set up for this shit. How many gofundme's can leftists possibly have in them?

I'm already hearing leftists screeching about MUH CENSORSHIP and claiming that the NPR and PBS were pillars of objective, unfiltered journalism and knowledge for the goyim, when in truth they are nothing but another Marxist propaganda pulpit.

reddit

You sure seem butthurt about it, leftygoon.

That's it? He's only cutting a billion? There's far more excessive spending by other branches. Especially the defense budget.

Good, nothing of value was lost.

He's cutting the F35 project.
If you're concerned about military money wasting then that should be really good news to you.

solid logic there, guy

Good for him. Trump hasn't even been in office for one workday and he has already accomplished more than Obama did in eight horrible years.

Is't deport Illegals already going forward whit net site that let you report illegals.

where my sudocuck at? i want him to weigh in on this

oh hey bud

He's only been in office two days

That's terrible. There was no art before 1965 when the National Endowment for the Arts was established. Now what?

Literally shaking right now.

Is my pornography safe under a trump presidency or will that be culled because of degeneracy?

What kind of pornography?

The degenerate kind

...

But what will libcucks listen to satisfy there smugness?

Don't worry, NPR will make up for the loss by taking more corporate and (((foundation))) "donations."

What about a ban on professional pornography?

So Drumpf gets to decide what channels are allowed now? Is this a fucking joke? Prepare your selves to be bombarded with pro Drumpf bullshit, it's going to be a rough ride.

This is literally how the fucking Nazis gained power….What the fuck has happened? I used to be a right winger but this just too much for me, Drumpf has gone too far this time. I am not sure if I can support him after this….It's a little too Nazi for my tastes I'm a patriot not a fucking fascist! Fuck you Chump!

I AM NOT YOUR PAWN!

MAKE REPUBLICANS GREAT AGAIN!

Thank god.

That's fine, as long as American taxpayers aren't paying for literal liberal brainwashing for their children like the britcucks do with BBC, I couldn't care less. Let the "free market" take care of it :^)

top cuck

Disgusting. I don't even know why I come here anymore, this is NOT the board I fell in love with. Drumpfscum poison EVERYTHING…..Fuck this gay earth.

Haha these posts are so funny and original.

TRIGGERED!

I use the same points because you are constantly unable to debate them, "muh based Drumpf is NOT an argument.

Okay man. You win. Whatever you say, haha!

Noone watches PBS anymore anyway, Mr Rodgers and Bob Ross are dead and they can't even reliably air decent British TV shows anymore because you can get them on cable and there isn't any good British TV post 1990 anyway.

We might actually have to go back to classical forms rather than Pollok squiggles, holy shit.

top kek. good night alt right.

I agree, and I've been saying this for the past year:
1. Trump IS a Democrat. He is a liberal. He will always be a liberal. If he wins (and he won't) he will remain a NYC liberal.

2. Trump will govern the same as Hillary – or perhaps even worse if Trump panders to racists and anti-semites.

3. The liberal MSM media are all PRO-TRUMP… they wanted Trump to win the nomination because everyone knows that Trump will be destroyed by Hillary in the general election. Trump is the Washington Generals and Hillary is the Harlem Globetrotters. GOOD WORK TRUMPKIN SCUM.

4. I would rather vote for Hillary because she is at least consistent and honest about her positions (and her positions on foreign policy and trade are pretty centrist/libertarian.)

t. unbiased conservative Rubio voter

Muh Drumpf is not an argument either, Jose.

YES IT IS, OH MY GOD FUCK YOU I HATE THIS WEBSITE! I'M GOING TO KILL MYSELF RIGHT NOW VIA LIVESTREAM, PLEASE DONATE TO MY PATREON TO HELP MY MOM PAY FOR MY CREMATION.

You are only hurting yourself with all this hatred, grow up.

I'll bet your family are REAL proud of their bigoted kin, grow the fuck up.

YOU ARE FUCKING DISGUSTING!!! GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!

IT'S YOU WHO HAS TO GO BACK!

BACK TO EUROPE!

This.

Grow up and get educated. Put yourself into tens of thousands of dollars of debt to get a REAL education at a university like I did. Diversity is so amazing you just have never experienced the real good diversity.

Either your major was in basket weaving or your "university" is a degree mill.

I'll have you know, my degree is in Womyn's Studies, you racyst misogynist piece of shyt.

Honestly this isn't going to happen in congress. Every so often retards try this, and it's a pittance in the grand scheme of things.
The funny thing about it all is that these faux conservatives are all talk about "not picking winners or losers" and then in the next action they go make municipal, locality level broadband illegal or attempt to make solar or wind utilities illegal
csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2017/0119/New-Wyoming-bill-forbids-utilities-from-using-renewables

Not even a drumpfsperg, but it's clear that the US system is seriously dysfunctional. It's a rot, and Trump certainly isn't draining the swamp. There's no chance of actually draining the swamp without a third party on all levels of government.

All Trump is, is entertainment. It's really entertaining to watch the dysfunction and very obvious corruption when any party gets majority seats. It's like a feeding frenzy of piranhas.
And that's what all politicians are, including Trump. Cognitive dissonance exemplified. No real principles. Just a feeding frenzy.

Oh, and why it always fails is children's programming. Good luck trying to defund an easy replacement for pre-school in woefully underfunded districts.

OF EBIN MEME

You forget congress is now republican majority.

It can and will happen.

...

Yeah, except that the times this has been attempted was with republican majorities. All public broadcasting needs to do is send one whiff of "your representative is defunding children's programming" and then the representative gets a phone stuck up his ass for 12 hours and a shitload of mail.
Not going to happen. And it's probably more cost effective than subsidizing pre-schooling in all of those districts.

What's the matter champ, have no rebuttal to the fact that they literally pick winners and losers when the guys who cut their campaign checks tell them do so?
No response to my link? Or the fact that "conservative" majorities are the ones outlawing locality-level broadband?
Why the fuck are state legislature even telling a municipality that they can't start their own utility? Oh, wait, we already went over that. $$$

It's kikes like you that deserve to be ovened.

After you, Santiago.

It is true though. Though there's an argument to whether that method is obsolete in the days of youtube, public broadcasting has survived every attempt at defunding just based on the pre-schooling replacement factor alone.

It won't survive this one. Guess we'll have to teach our little tykes shit other than Sesame Street and Peppa Pig.

lmao, if you say so champ.
If there's one thing I've learned, we go through these motions every time.
Public broadcasting! It's like an autistic child, it's the same shit every 8 years.
As I said, watch as the faux conservatives circlejerk over defunding public broadcasting because "we don't like to pick winners and losers" and then fund corn and oil subsidies in the next bill, make solar and wind utilities illegal, and outlaw municipalities from running their own fiber optic cables, not to mention all their retarded pet projects.
Bridge to nowhere ring a bell?
If you're going to pretend that you're taking a principled stand about funding that amounts to literally peanuts, why don't you want to talk about any funding that's actually substantial?

Oh, right, it's because you're as mentally ill as a die hard "democrat".
The two party system needs to fucking burn.

Literally Hitler.

If Trump wants it, it will happen. He doesn't give a fuck. When will people learn this?

you fail civics, champ?
representatives will have a phone up their ass. it's as simple as that.

I guess even he wasn't perfect

y yuo off beings so upsets? :DDD
not being able of doings the thinking? XDDDD

GO OF SUGGING BENIS YUO HOMOSEX
8============================D

You fail in debate, you fucking goon? The reason this didn't happen sooner is because there was a libshit nigger in the White House. But please keep denying that a paradigm shift actually occurred to play your "both sides are the same" meme when you're just a liberal pretending to be a devil's advocate.

...

Wow, I seem to have riled the autists up.
They've been doing this since the fucking 80s, retard. Exactly how old are you? Probably underage.
Mental illness alert, no one cares about your boogeyman.
What paradigm shift? Why does it matter? CPB represents piss peanuts in the federal budget. It's something like ~400 million over two years for PBS and radio, and something like something 0.008 percent of the federal budget, or a dollar for each taxpayer every year. That's the subsidies that each local station gets, NPR, PBS itself, etc. Everything.

It's such mind boggling stupidity to focus on that it's a running joke. And it is a joke.
Because, really, if you know your history, it has nothing to do with "we can't afford it" and has everything to do with the symbolic gesture of eliminating one of the most visible LBJ legacy programs.

If you weren't underage you'd know that "convervatives" are still asshurt 60 years later about Goldwater losing to Johnson. There's really nothing more to it, when you're talking about grown men spending the time to complain about what's basically a rounding error in the federal budget.

Obviously you didn't have the chance for pre-school or having your poorfag parents sitting you in front of PBS in the morning, considering how fucking stupid you are.

In a decade you will all be in gas chambers.

television without 30 minutes dedicated to flashing braindead pieces of colorful chinese plastic every hour is marxism.
it is funny though, some retards actually believe this, unironically

Oy vey.

It's not even fun shitposting, it's just bad shitposting. I know you're desperate for attention though, so go ahead and demonstrate it.

You lost, it's time to stop throwing a tantrums.

Kum on chumperino, what's wrong with making Germany great again?

What they did "wrong" is the same thing every sane government in human history has done, name the Jew and incarcerate subversive leftists and degenerates.

There's no evidence to refute, you've declared a priori that there is a bias.
Guess it's time for you to seek attention elsewhere. But I do understand your loneliness user.

>Last week, NPR's own official ombudsman, Jeffrey Dvorkin, admitted a liberal bias in NPR's talk programming. The daily program "Fresh Air with Terry Gross" - a 60-minute talk show about the arts, literature, and also politics - airs on 378 public-radio stations across the fruited plain. Gross recently became a hot topic on journalism Web sites for first having a friendly, giggly interview with "satirist" Al Franken, promoting his obnoxious screed against conservatives on September 3, and then on October 8, unloading an accusatory, hostile interview on Bill O'Reilly. She pressed the Fox host to respond to the obnoxious attacks of Franken and other critics. Dvorkin ruled: "Unfortunately, the [O'Reilly] interview only served to confirm the belief, held by some, in NPR's liberal media bias….by coming across as a pro-Franken partisan rather than a neutral and curious journalist, Gross did almost nothing that might have allowed the interview to develop."

Mr Rogers also was adamant about not making any merchandise out of his show and creations, but guess what? Once he was dead and gone PBS did just that with Daniel Tiger.

Yeah, guess your parents didn't do pre-school or PBS. It really shows.

That man really was a saint.

all cuck

Nothing tastes sweeter than the impotent tears of liberal cucks.

The goalpost was the following, friend:
Nothing is sadder than reading the ironic shitposting produced by wasted portential. Maybe if you got some pre-schooling or children's programming you wouldn't be a drooling retard :^)
But I guess that's why it needs defunded, so the two-party bullshit is kept up every 8 years.

You sad, sad creature. Why not go back to Holla Forums, it's obvious you're not fit for debate with humans.

No, you said:
i.e. wide ranging bias
Now you're just shitposting hard, the piece you quoted was the NPR ombudsman, referring to NPR's talk programming.
Humans are usually capable of referring to a text they just quoted not even two posts ago, so I guess you'd qualify as a subhuman.

But he said wide ranging bias.

Still doesn't take away from the fact NPR is biased. But I guess you'd rather nitpick than address the main point because you know very well you've lost already.

Also, friendly reminder this is what you produce: subhumans who aren't capable of actually reading, if you don't drop your faggot kids off at a pre-school or sit their fat fuck ass down in front of PBS.
If you faggots do reproduce, do the world a favor and do either, or both.

Gas the Big Bird,

No, you retarded faggot subhuman, he did not. Your quote said "NPR's own official ombudsman, Jeffrey Dvorkin, admitted a liberal bias in NPR's talk programming." Then it followed up with a single example in one show among dozens syndicated, with one interview where the host did some stupid O'Reilly vs Franken slapfest. That's not indicative of a wide ranging bias, that's an admission of a single example, and it's an autistic attempt to grasp at straws.

You seem to have some serious mental deficiencies. I get that you're lonely, but maybe it's because you're a subhuman. There's other subhumans who can't read out there, though, so don't be discouraged.

Clearly, all the news about these devout PBS listeners setting people on fire, suckerpunching mediators, rioting, littering and assaulting people is the Marxist ideal of society. Everyone is equal, everyone is a nigger.

NPR: If You're Just Joining Us, The Republicans Are Dangerously Extremist
newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/10/17/npr-if-youre-just-joining-us-republicans-are-dangerously-extremist

NPR Ends Williams' Contract After Muslim Remarks
npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130712737

NPR is blind to its own liberal bias
articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-03-21/news/fl-ctcol-npr-congress-thomas-0321-20110321_1_npr-fundraiser-conservative-activist-james-o-keefe-betsy-liley

OY VEY, OY GEVALT.

At least if they send their child "indoctrination camp" they'll be able to read and won't mix up NPR and PBS every other post. i.e., they won't be a subhuman nigger like yourself.

I'd rather be the leftist definition of a "subhuman" than anything like you.

And keep hammering about an honest mistake in your pathetic attempts to derail and distract from the facts. You're not fooling anyone.

>newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/10/17/npr-if-youre-just-joining-us-republicans-are-dangerously-extremist
>npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130712737
I don't see how that has anything to do with a bias in their reporting, they're allowed to fire for any reason. After all, the U.S. is at-will employment.
At-will employment is a conservative cornerstone, btw. Are you arguing for marxism?
>articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-03-21/news/fl-ctcol-npr-congress-thomas-0321-20110321_1_npr-fundraiser-conservative-activist-james-o-keefe-betsy-liley
That article contains no actual evidence of any widespread bias, just whining and crying about donations made to it and rambling about some sting situation which an employee was fired for.

...

They fired him because he said something bad about the Religion of Peace.

If only the left could stop being hypocrites about this.

By George Soros. Just a coincidence, after all, we know how much he loves giving money to unbiased organizations such as BLM.

And I think we're done. I've proven they have a liberal bias with example after example and you've got nothing.

ayy

There's not, except when it's shoved in kids faces for thirty minutes every hour.
It's nice to have available if my kid loves one of the characters, I guess.

Oy.

That's at-will employment. They're allowed to fire for any reason, especially anything your employer percieves as producing a shistorm. Are you arguing against capitalism?
No, you're the one being hypocritical here.
Oy vey donations mean there's a wide ranging liberal bias
lmao

No, that's not my burden. That's not how burden of proof works.
Again, a demonstration of the failure in your poorfag parents to sit you down in front of Sesame Street.

You mixed up NPR with PBS
You mixed up PBS with NPR "listeners"
You brought up NPR when I was referring to television, implying that they're both the same thing

It must be hard, having the IQ of a nigger.

Does Ian Mckellen willingly what to be killed by Muslims?

That's Ian McKellen, not Patrick Stewart.

McKellan is a literal fag. Stewart was one of the few Trek actors who wasn't involved in that Trek against Trump activist group.

What's wrong with that? Windmills are eyesores that explode violently in a light breeze when they aren't turning birds into meatsause and also drive property values into the ground while contributing no real energy to a grid; they are only economically practical with the State giving people in the sticks subsidies to fund them. Solar's less destructive but still hasn't hit 50% efficiency even with many decades of development and the very best ones go to crap quickly as dust obscures the sensitive elements, not to mention the atmosphere getting in the way (two-thirds of those problems aren't so bad in space of course, and as such solar's just fine for satellites). The only reliable method to generate energy with minimal environmental impact through natural processes on Earth has been hydroelectric, and even then you have some problems of both wind and solar there (chumming fish from the former and silt buildup from the latter).

Forgetting fusion power for a moment as both Tokamak and Polywell haven't gotten off the ground, we could have invested more time and energy making all our current chemical/fission reaction technologies more efficient, safer and cleaner, but instead we put all our money into these other piles of trash to appease video-related types (who need to be thrown in a bog to be honest; in a few thousand years they will become energy producing mounds of peat, so it'd be a net benefit no matter how you cut it).

reply in

They're picking winners and losers.
Incorrect, the only reliable method to generate energy with minimal environmental impact through natural processes on Earth has been NUCLEAR.
Despite what braindead hippies will tell you, Hydroelectric has killed untold numbers of people more than nuclear, and has wrecked many habitats and migration patterns.
One example among many:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
You're also about to see some major carnage in Iraq within the decade if they don't fix the Mosul Dam, because the sandniggers built it on an unstable foundation and it shifted slightly when other sand niggers (ISIS) took total control over it. The occupying sandniggers didn't know that they had to fill in cracks in the foundation basically 24/7 with concrete, and thus it shifted, and who knows when it will burst if they don't fix it.
Fuck, the Army Corps of Engineers have had to basically engineer elevators for Salmon and other fish into new dams, because it was fucking up many habitats. It doesn't fix all of the environmental impact, but it does shut the most die hard hippies up.

Meanwhile, even Solar kills and pollutes more than nuclear, even considering that Solar is relatively new, it has killed orders of magnitude more from the pollution.
Even fucking wind.
There's no way to make it more cleaner. What you want is a reactor that physically can't melt down. EVERY NUCLEAR ACCIDENT STEMS FROM INADEQUATE COOLING IN A REALLY UNFORTUNATE SITUATION. That's the bottom line. Even Chernobyl was the result of a retarded Russian night shift shutting off the cooling system. Japan was the result of a fucking Tsunami damaging backup generators.

We already have the technology for a reactor that shuts and cools itself down, and the Democrats used the same arguments that Republicans love so much to destroy the funding/earmarks for that project, the same argument retards are using for defunding a rounding error in the budget: "we can't afford it/boondoggle spending."

Wew. Apparently government-funded news cant be based in any way.

Good thing big bird flocked to HBO

Genuinely curious - how does solar pollute?

Excluding the pollution that comes from production, since that would obviously improve if solar ever became an efficient option.

It probably wouldn't, we don't know how to make them without Rare Earths.
There's probably some biological genetic engineering dream, but 1) material extraction for nuclear is really clean and 2) we can power shit with nuclear weapons for about a century if we wanted to and 3) we can use waste from plants and recycle it for fuel.
Solar is dirty, relatively, when you consider that.

Oh, and, we really need to recycle our nuclear arms. You know the plutonium at the center of a bomb? We don't fucking understand plutonium. It is the most complex naturally occuring element, as far as we know. Numerous crystal phases just between room temperature and boiling, catches fire spontaneously in the presence of water vapor, and if you inhale any trace amounts you will die of lung cancer. Guaranteed.
Why should we recycle our nuclear weapons? Plutonium-Galloy in the pits of nuclear weapons. No one knows why it fucking works, it just does. So, we have the most complex element in the table that we don't understand in the core of nuclear bombs, and they've just been sitting there for 60 years. Sound like a good idea to you, or would you bet on a nuclear disaster thanks to loss of integrity?
The ultimate irony in all this is that the Navy chose and propagated among the world the shitty nuclear energy that's prone to melting down (Light Water Reactors) all so we could produce plutonium for bombs.

Or, actually, I should clarify: prone to melting down at massive scales.
In submarines it's a no brainer, easy to maintain, no need for many safety systems.
You have to engineer safety around the design when you scale it up to power plants. That's not good engineering. Safety should be engineered from the start.

Why do you have such a hard-on for this topic?

Because I read books in between shitposting, faggot.

I'm just trying to figure out what you like ;_;

How is he literally Hitler or pro Jewish genocide in anyway?

He wants too deport illegal immigrants, stopping people from webm related from entering your country, not all Mexicans. Bring back jobs too America which he is already succeeding at when he got the nomination, stop immigrants from Muslim countries until the situation gets better and fuck up the media that has not been held accountable for literal lies they publish under the pretense of free speech.

Fukushima fucked up because the safety regulations were abysmal.

There was another reactor closer to the epicenter of the quake, but nothing happened because the guy who built it said that safety inspectors were human vermin and built the seawall much much higher than he was supposed to

My point that every nuclear disaster stems from human incompetence.
Chernobyl was a result of a Soviet night shift testing a supposed "feature" that supervisors dreamt up, tried it out, an explosion happened, and then many people were instantly vaporized, though some from the control room still live to this day, not to mention the dozens of deaths from cancer in the cleanup crew because Chernobyl had no containment whatsoever. But as far as the normal population goes, no one died or got cancer.
No one in the normal population will get cancer or die due to Fukashima either.

Yes, God went nuclear on multiple cities for being full of faggots.

CTR go home youre drunk

lol freaking out doesn't do shit on the internet

>The liberal MSM media are all PRO-TRUMP… they wanted Trump to win the nomination because everyone knows that Trump will be destroyed by Hillary in the general election