Protestantcucks bashing the Pope with such glee forgetting their cult has been cucked since inception to present day

Protestantcuckery was the biggest D&C plot in history. Forgetting about the thirty years' war, aren't we…

...

Everyone hated Jews back then so what's your point? What would have that cocksucker have accomplished if he was a philosemite? Just plummeting his reputation.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luther's_canon
Get it?

Nothing in Hebrews, James, Jude, or Revelation contradicts salvation by grace through faith alone.

Luther was pretty retarded and didn't understand the Bible I guess.

It's painfully obvious that sola fide is heretical:

31 'When the Son of man comes in his glory, escorted by all the angels, then he will take his seat on his throne of glory.

32 All nations will be assembled before him and he will separate people one from another as the shepherd separates sheep from goats.

33 He will place the sheep on his right hand and the goats on his left.

34 Then the King will say to those on his right hand, "Come, you whom my Father has blessed, take as your heritage the kingdom prepared for you since the foundation of the world.

35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you made me welcome,

36 lacking clothes and you clothed me, sick and you visited me, in prison and you came to see me."

37 Then the upright will say to him in reply, "Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?

38 When did we see you a stranger and make you welcome, lacking clothes and clothe you?

39 When did we find you sick or in prison and go to see you?"

40 And the King will answer, "In truth I tell you, in so far as you did this to one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did it to me."

41 Then he will say to those on his left hand, "Go away from me, with your curse upon you, to the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

42 For I was hungry and you never gave me food, I was thirsty and you never gave me anything to drink,

43 I was a stranger and you never made me welcome, lacking clothes and you never clothed me, sick and in prison and you never visited me."

44 Then it will be their turn to ask, "Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty, a stranger or lacking clothes, sick or in prison, and did not come to your help?"

45 Then he will answer, "In truth I tell you, in so far as you neglected to do this to one of the least of these, you neglected to do it to me."

46 And they will go away to eternal punishment, and the upright to eternal life.'

tragic

Nothing about that contradicts salvation by faith alone. It implies believers as a collective whole did good works throughout their lives, but nowhere does it say that it is required to get saved.

How do you people reconcile these heretical beliefs of works-based salvation with passages such as:

>For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.

>Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

This is why protestantism is the best though. There is no head other than some retard who thinks he's the head.

Protestantism is about you and jebus unlike Papists who worship the pope and other false idols

You don't worship God, but Jesus, they don't worship God but the pope, what's the difference?

Both of you are essentially atheists, who have replaced God with a person.

Jesus = God in material form as a man

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God….And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Makes perfect sense, God, the being on which all existence balances and who created everything, made himself very small and went down to his creation (which only exist because he exists) and turned himself into a man, in order to spread a religion that he didn't write down, so he could become crucified by his own creation. This happens even though God is the source and origin of all that is.

Your concept of salvation didn't exist before protestantcuckery, that refers to something else entirely which applies to everyone:

11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

17 And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.

18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:

22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

It is in fact the fucking opposite!!!!!!!!!!

Break free from the chains of institutionalized pretense at faith that exists only to control you and keep you in spiritual bondage.

Strawmanning and trying to make it sound stupid on purpose doesn't make it any less true or any less possible. Just because the reality of God does not sync with your own personal expectations of how you feel God should be doesn't make it any less true or any less possible. This is how the creator of the universe chose to express Himself. Deal with it.

My faith is the true faith. Your faith (I'm assuming you're either catholic or orthodox) started when Constantine hijacked Christianity in 313 and started all this papacy nonsense. Tell me, what were Christians doing before the Roman Empire adopted the faith? None of the catholic or orthodox traditions or churches existed. Did all those early Christians go to hell?

And again, nothing about those verses contradicts salvation by grace through faith. And you failed to address the verses that I brought up.

Here's another point: the thief on the cross. He spent his entire life in sin. He was never baptized, never ate the wafer or drank the red wine, never went to church, never went into a confessional, etc. And yet Jesus Himself said to the thief that he will be in paradise. How is this possible? Because the thief believed that Jesus was God and knew that he was a sinner in need of a savior. Case closed.

I should also add that I am not a protestant.

Baptists are not and never were a part of the Catholic church, are not protesting the Catholic church, and have been around a hell of a lot earlier than Martin Luther. There has always been a group of independent believers from the very beginning after Jesus' time who adhered to the true faith and shunned all the different heresies and attempts at institutionalizing Christianity.

You are lost. Again, compare these two quotes:

What does Protestantism have in common with Early Christianity? Ever heard of Apostolic Succession?

...

Apostolic Succession is a catholic heresy. The institution and traditions of Catholicism did not exist for hundreds of years after Jesus' death. Rome's claims to be of a lineage going back to the early church founders is a joke.

Again, your quotes do not contradict salvation by grace through faith alone. And again, you failed to address the verses that I brought up.

You don't go to hell until you are morally accountable for your actions. A baby has no concept of sin or any self-awareness whatsoever. Dead babies instantly go to Heaven. And baptism is not required to go into Heaven anyway. It is a symbolic token of your faith, and something you can only do of your free will once you believe on Jesus Christ. That is what the Bible teaches.

Your church teaches that unbaptized babies go to Purgatory. Show me in the Bible where Purgatory is even a thing. It's pure fanfiction.

Provide source that your cult teaches that.

…
…
…
…
…
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

Alright, do you have an argument WHY it isn't stupid?

No wait, you don't, because it is stupid.

Please explain to me, why this sentence would not apply to you as well.

I see, no argument WHY it makes sense, it just does, because…..

God is not illogical, the creator of the universe, does not take human form, so he can be killed.

God trancends the universe, he is not a part of it, which is atheism.

Nothing will destroy your desire to be christian more, than reading religious arguments on Holla Forums

How about you acknowledge the points that I've already brought up (Ephesians 2 and Romans 3, the fate of followers during the gap of time between Jesus and Constantine, the lie of purgatory, the thief on the cross, etc.). You're avoiding everything that I say and then nitpicking one or two sentences to criticize. This conversation is pointless.

How is baptism required for salvation if the thief on the cross did not get baptized, and everywhere else in the Bible that talks of salvation says that it is faith alone? Is Jesus a liar?

"Being born of water" is ambiguous enough a statement wherein it cannot be stated as a definitive proof of requiring the ritual of baptism itself for salvation. There is a mountain of evidence that contradicts such a thing that you're conveniently ignoring.

Whether or not it's stupid is entirely subjective. I could make a perfectly legitimate argument defending it and you could still dismiss it as stupid because even the explanation would feel stupid. It is what it is; take it or leave it.

The reality of what the Bible teaches is not based on my feelings of how I think God should be. A lot of things about God seem strongly counter-intuitive, but it's like a child not understanding why he can't just eat candy and play vidya all day and thus resents his father's rules.

Nothing about the crucifixion is illogical. According to the Bible the definition of love is selflessness, and God sacrificing His own life so that we may be saved is the ultimate act of love. God loves us and wants us to be in paradise. Why not just avoid all this and create a paradise from the beginning? Because we must choose to want to be with God of our own free will.

You are trying to put a limitation on God's power. God can be inside the universe, be outside the universe, and be the universe itself.

tfw jew shill vs jew shill

It is amazing how christians can not only argue atheists and pagans, but also among themselves.

The great unifier my fucking ass.

Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
Luke 12:51

Kindly refer back to the image in this post: and realize that it is actually you atheists who think like kikes.

Muh fetuses!

This is getting ridiculous, the new paradigm started with the Resurrection. The thief on the cross and everyone else before him were judged with different measures. It can't get any more obvious:
"I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire."

You've dodged every point that I made and offered, at best, an extremely weak counterargument that implies the Bible is loaded with errors and contradictions.

I'll leave you with this: the catholic catechism says that all Jews, Muslims, Atheists, and Homosexuals go to Heaven without needing Jesus. Do you agree with this? If not then you are protesting the Catholic church, and are no different than Martin Luther.

Together with every other European. Unlike the rest, we don't hate our past.
I do hate vikings with a passion, though.

...

What a shock

Really?

Heh, atheists not breeding makes it a two-way street.

In the US yes. With immigration and gib me dats shitskins aborting at 4 times the rate as whites is the only reason the US is even at 64% "white". I wouldn't even want to think what the country would look like without a planned parenthood in every ghetto.

I'm not sure what you are even trying to imply.

neither are christian

youtube.com/watch?v=kMRCjvUXVEo (already exists)

Christians are currently the only white people reproducing at above replacement levels.

Atheists are nothing but fag-enablers who murder their own children and actively participate in white genocide.

Atheism is more popular with urban whites. Atheists not breeding = less whites.

Less whites =/= keeping the nation white

Rather than abortion, how about having them behave? You know, the thing that is not allowed these days. The thing that kept blacks from murdering in South Africa.

You mean from the birth of Jesus? Yes, I agree with you, OP.

A jew would hate Jesus enough to slander him whenever he can.

That looks like a really non partial and well documented source. Heh

The memes abound ITT

And Christcucks protesting abortion= more niggers
Where the hell has that ever worked? Oh Christcucks your universalist naive ideals is your downfall time and time again.

top fucking kek
'jews' aren't the descendents of the tribes of israel they're inbred canaanite/khazar desert people
in the new testament they're referred to as the pharisees

the talmud is judaism you retard

And the Torah is the old testament.

I didn't know anyone was still pushing the Khazar hypothesis.

dailystormer.com/dr-duke-and-dr-macdonald-utterly-destroy-and-debunk-the-khazar-theory/

Nope.

The Torah is the first 5 books out of the 37 of the OT. And according to rabbinic teaching via the Talmud, they regard the Torah largely as a book of fables.

Blacks don't breed like that in every nation they exist in.

Still, birthrates lower than replacement rate… It cannot be the answer. How about keeping blacks from breeding via methods not promoted by jews? Such as sterilization.

Read Luther's book: On Jews and their lies.

Dr. Duke is also pro-Christian.

Funny how you people will cherrypick your info.

At least you admitted you Abrahamists follow the same fables that's a lot more the average Christcuck will even admit.

...

In Africa. When whitey ruled, and was not abandoned and betrayed by the fifth column. [which was not african]

Huh? What does that have to do with the Khazar hypothesis?

Funny how Christians can't logic.

If I find a case where a judge is being unjust, does it make the law null?

When Dr. Duke talks about Khazar theory you consider him a great source.

When Dr. Duke states he's pro-Christian you ignore that stuff.

You're cherrypicking info from your source.

I didn't post it as

I posted it as a conclusion from a discussion with Kevin MacDonald, the real expert on Jews, and David Duke. Not even Duke buys the Khazar hypothesis.

people who follow heretics also go to hell for not using their brains.

Infact it looks like cathocucks and protestants are both pozzed, the orthodoxy has some idea on what to do but the message has been erroded.

Well they do in mine.
Why_not_both.spicloil

That sure worked out well. Was part of that the pope telling niggers they can't use condoms while all Christcucks including Lutheran social services twist there followers arms into dumping money into the collection plate for the poor Africans?

What?

I just said how modern Talmudic/Kabbalist Judaism rejects the OT and the books of Moses. The whole point is that modern Judaism has nothing to do with Christianity or with the faith of the ancient Israelites.

Actual Christian billboard. The craziest among them opposed the use of condoms in Africa.

So Duke is a great source when he agrees with you. Gotcha.

but where is the art?

Why are Christians so dumb?

huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/14/religious-people-less-intelligent-atheists_n_3750096.html

How about finding out why. If it is a phenotype issue, sterilization will fix it. No kills necessary. Except of course, the occasional police brutality and following chimpouts.

Always referring to 'now'. Yeah, in a jude controlled world, everything is shit. Especially if you are corrupted and your lenses are covered in it.

Great logic, mane.

I had missed you, art-user

Nice Huffingtonpost link, faggot.

Next you can tell me about how gender is a social construct and white people have too much privilege.

- flat dull color design, very blatant café like color palette used in commercials.
- specularity on the hair region, why the need of gloss and plastic?
- eyebrow and eyes overlapping the hair, that is not how facial design works, in fact it wouldn't make any sense to have the eyes in front of the hair, why is it clipping through?
- the fur points is not diverse enough to be considered an actual fur
- very little to non shadowing
- bad composition, why the need to cut the top side of the hair?
- no rule of thirds, what is this?
- the right bottom side of the ribbon doesn't seem to be connected aside from the exposure of the lineart.
- the line art stroke is overwhelmingly used.
- where is the lightsource?
- café palette usage on the character but a massive contrast with the color usage "blue" on the background, why?
- headmold/ scale oversized, the pointy chin seems unnecessary

I don't see it, where is the art?

You said they use the same books right here. Which all Abrahamists do, same with the rag heads.

Yeah I'm talking about the time we live in right now, the time that maters to you and me…

Your out right denial is insane. And if you can't even bring yourself to kill a cell don't expect to drastically change society by your hands.

where the hell have you been?

But you only use current examples. I use working examples. Ones before these dark times.

Your 'solution' is no solution at all. Slow extinction is still extinction.

I guess they were right.

That's my point Abrahamism is the reason we are in these dark times to begin with.

...

Urbanite social trend-followers have higher IQ than those still stuck in the old ways.

Problem is that those social trends are manufactured from beginning to end.

Christians are not like that, user.

well about the religion, these religion are actually capable of creating classic art, but no art to be seen from easterncuck religion

Then again, protestant and christians can actually create art and the eastcucks cannot

BUT WAIT A MINUTE WHERE IS THE ART ON THE SECOND PIC?

OH MAN, LOOK, I CAN FINALLY SEE the lack of art in your post, there is none to be found so lets have a look shall we?

- unnecessary lineart on the cheekbone region
- badly composed hatches on the eyesocket, eyebrow and the right side of the neck
- headscale and proportion unfit for a neck of that scale to handle the weight, see : Basic anatomy 101
- where is the nose?
- no line art near the left/right side of the eyes in the whiter region, why leave it out if you're going to use it?
- eyebrow and slightly the right eyelid is overlapping with the hair.
- flat color does not function with hatches.
- no signs of the hair being tied up, where is the lines that guides the viewer?
- bad shadowing, the shadow below the neck is a lot weaker then that found on her left arm.
- massive line strokes found on her body indicating that it is more important then her face, bad quality achieved here.
- horribly composed mouth.
- hard strokes on the earlobe.
- specularity surrounding the hair yet again.

Again, I just can't see it, where can it be?

Bruh, Huffingtonpost will cite scientific sources that "prove" white privilege exists, that gender is a social construct, or that Islamization of Europe is a myth, too.

I bet they have articles on how evil the natzees were, and they can cite scientific sources that totally prove the holocaust happened.

It's a kike-run lugenpresse site with zero credibility and a godless faggot kike agenda to push.

Daily reminder that anime is degenerate and not an artform.

See source.

lel

Why can't the east create proper art?

That's why I opened the source they used instead of reading the article…

Heh
e
h

H E H

HEH
E
H

heh h e h

Weird way to say Kikes and humanism. It's almost as if you wanted to mask the real evil.

Trips have nice symmetry.

I filtered you can quite replying to my same post over and over again.

Kikes were the first Abrhamists

East versus West

...

Those 2 Western paintings are lifeless academic horse shit. Grow some taste.

WEW
E
W

...

>biblehub.com/john/8-39.htm
Now, vampires can't see themselves from a mirror, and jews are indeed, blind to themselves. I will take Luther's advice on this one and just stop arguing against you.

oh man my sides

EASTERN QUALITY ART COMING THROUGH

Satan detected

That seems like more evidence for them being the same.

Don't forget to report

Pick one

...

Taking but a momentary break on the Blood War.
He will fight, soldiering ever on

Keep reading.

Well, I guess I'm a top at least.

Thanks user, genuinely lol'd

...

Artpiece: Fine Wind, Clear Morning (Red Fuji)
Artist Katsushika Hokusai
Year c. 1830

Artpiece: Napoleon Crossing the Alps
Artist Jacques-Louis David
Year 1801

EASTERN ART

WOAH, WATCH OUT, THESE "ART" PIECES WILL SURE WRECK THE WEST THIS TIME!

Can't unsee. Damn spurdos.

Is there anything of value you've contributed in this thread, faggot?

Don't respond just filter and report

Eastern political cartoons are as shit as western ones.

Wow, you leanr new things every day!

Why are you so god damn butthurt? what is there to contribute to a D&C thread anyway? I don't think mods are on your side.

...

- same eyes, flipped symmetrically and specularity altered so it won't be completely retarded with the lighting
- no shadow to be found on her bottom part
- the "artist" felt the need to put "?" on top of her head because he failed to give the interpreter the sensation of confusion from this character's face (emotionless)
- specular/gloss on hair region, unnecessary.
- eyes and eyebrow overlaps the hair yet again.
- no shadow on the hair ribbon
- overwhelmingly large headscale
- where is the nose?
- where is the mouth?
- no rule of thirds
- where is the composition, why was her whole lower body cropped out? why did it have to be cropped on her chest region?
- no background.
- boring
- uneasy for the eyes.

It's the painterautist. He has been shilling for about 4 months now.

...

It's just shit-tier dialogue. It would be like some Afrocentric board where they made fun of White art by posting Velvet Elvis paintings.

Holla Forums is usually better than this.

Daily reminder that the east lacks creativity and innovation; therefore results in extreme asspain on this thread.

East versus West

You really have to start a thread someday with the "dos and don'ts" of art, with pics of various artwork and accompanying commentary.

This whole thread and it's purpose is shit-tier dialogue. I don't see how painterguy is out of place here.

All christcucks are cucks and every form of christcuckery is a brainch of judaism which makes it a semetic cult.

Hitler-election dubs confirm this thread is only improves by "where is the art" user

If you wanted to argue that East Asians are less distinguished as visual artists than whites, then a lot of us would agree. Some of that is probably cultural, as Western art owes so much to a small number of cultures, particularly the Greek.

However, if you want to argue they are not creative, then, no.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_inventions

Nice work user.

Okay user. You keep believing that.

He's been busy doing this IRL at liberal 'art' galleries probably

The Last Pope

All realms apart from Heaven can be classified as hell

...

The tribes of israel were filthy hook-nosed kikes. Anyone who glorifies them will be killed come RWDS time.

Have fun genociding most white people.

You may as well convert to Judaism and move to Israel at this point. You both have the same goals.

Most white people don't buy into the idiotic "israelites were good guys, fuck those bad roman goyim! we're the real jews!" bullshit, it's only the really hardcore churchgoing scum who engage in that sort of racial cuckery.

The majority of white people are some variation of Christian. Dedicated atheism is at like 10% of the population, while "spiritual but not religious" is at around 20-30% at best. Other religions are like 1-2% of whites.

You're advocating for the mass execution of the majority of white people. The only racecuck here is you. Shalom.