Guccifer 2.0 haxed Hillary

Top Cuck

...

Russia also has a copy of a ton of Hillary's emails that they intercepted and are threatening to release.

Wow.
I was talking about the extracted files' metadata.
Not that I expect someone showcasing an hex editor to have any clue.

You forgot a "lelelelel" somewhere.

16chan.nl/polin/thread/530
Better organized thread without the neo-reddit shitposting of cuckchan2.0

never ever

fucking christ please tell me that's shopped

nigger looks like a fucking picasso painting

Holy shit how far apart are (((Josh)))'s eyes?

You think people who live and breathe to archive every scrap of information about someone on the net and twist it out of context wouldn't eventually start taking creative liberties with it?

that's a lot of faggy words to simply state it was edited

...

I already regret this

No, never.

...

>>>/cow/214087

Are you so delusional you think Trump doesn't do the same?

This is an inside job to try and #NeverTrump just before thr convention. For opposition research its very weak. Trump credits father with never drinking... that was actually his brother. They even have the full quote but cannot into reading comprehension. Pathetic really, it will be fun to watch these dumb fucks crack under Trump's relentless attacks this summer now that the DNC shot their whole wad.

top thread derail shitpostfriend :^)

You seem really upset that people would use other imageboards.
Particularly one that's not total dog shit like this one, software wise.

null pls

...

I like this trip better
not sure why josh didn't use it

I suggest you fucking kill yourself, retard.

we are all null
is null too. he just doesn't know it yet.

>>>Holla Forums
>>>/reddit/
>>>/suicide/

Specifically which metadata are you referring to?

Second year digital forensics student here.

Also have not examined any of it yet.

He's referring to the fact that it was saved in a russian locale at some point.
The metadata: author and company names all match up to people related to the Hillary campaign at least.

All red herrings. These documents were created all together and the "names connected to the the DNC" you see are all badly copy-pasted in the document properties. The authorship goes to "Феликс Эдмундович" - and that is another red herring itself.

Making a step back, there's only one consideration to make: it does not make sense to produce anything but the real documents. Without even considering here the content and these files, actively challenged by many (including Trump HQ) since they seem really "too idiotic"

It does make sense if they were saved once in a russian locale as samples.
If wikileaks doesn't have the originals, or the tens of thousands of documents story doesn't hold water with them, then you could say that they're a psyop campaign for whoever.

Would you really be surprised?

pretty sure its fake, as the DNC isnt using it as a soapbox to legislate new laws like they do with the bodies of children and victims of hate crime

I wish I got to meet patrick batman.

No, these documents were created on a "russian locale". There's quite a difference. Content from other docs may have been copy pasted, but these are not "resaved" documents.
Yes. By both the substantive content (what these document say) and the formal content (font/formatting/watermark).

Content from other docs may have been copy pasted, but these are not "resaved" documents.
You definitely see that with most of the docs.
They're not "complete." So probably copy-pasted.