There are no "successful" African nations because colonization completely drained, and continues to drain...

There are no "successful" African nations because colonization completely drained, and continues to drain, Africa's resources.

Plus, a lot of govts are corrupt and steal all the money that's supposed to go to the people. Like think about how many charities donate to Africa. That's where the money goes.

And a lot of fucked up stuff goes down there in general. Like when Nestle was capitalizing off of selling African mothers formula even though it was expensive and not as healthy as breast milk. Or the Catholic Church providing aid and healthcare to Africans with HIV or AIDS, but banning the use of condoms.

Not saying that Africans are all helpless victims, but there was a time when Europe had a meeting to decide who got to own which country. A lot of setbacks have happened throughout history and even today.

How do you respond to this kind of shit?

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/pol/res/7115342.html
uk.businessinsider.com/the-19-most-expensive-cities-in-the-world-2016-6?r=US&IR=T
twitter.com/AnonBabble

also gonna dump qt

...

...

...

...

No the reason the are unsuccessful is because N I G G E R S are fucking stupid

Who is this

She looks like a fucking coulburner m8 stop posting

Colonization only helps the Africans. They're incapable of civilization without external help. Vid related.

Welcome to capitalist society. People try to steal your shekels every now and then. Ⓝⓘⓖⓖⓔⓡⓢ in Africa do it plenty themselves.

That's exactly what you're saying, ⓒⓤⓒⓚ. If niggers were capable of prosperity, they would've done in centuries ago.

You mean when African nations had working roads and clean water?

You know what was 'a bit of a setback? World War Two. Europe and Asia rebuilt their civilizations from the rubble, while Africa continued to rot away.

By colonizing Africa again, ideally. China is already gaining ground.

Good goy. It's never blacks fault. Dey wuz kangs!

the government of a country represents its people. if there are motherfuckers in charge it's because the country's full of motherfuckers. if the next US president is a moron it's because the americans are stupid as a whole

It would be nice to see a prosperous and enlightened aftican continent. To the point that we might be able to pull the supports out, and they'd be able to stay afloat on their own.

it's too bad the chinese will probably take longer than my life time to oust the native inhabitants and make ot happen, though

Plenty of countries do waaaaaay better than Africa with much less

Europeans aren't exactly to blame. The less European influence the more corrupt I expect. See South Africa, which is now as bad as any other African country but which was before developing at a decent pace

Yes like huge murder rates, single motherhood, massacres, civil war, welfare dependency. Those are the worst problems. The main problem is bad government which lets these things happen

Uniting with Europe was a huge step forward but progress was betrayed due to cancerous progressivism

THERE IS A SUCCESSFUL AFRICAN NATION:
South Africa

It is successful for one single reason: white man built and developed it. After Mandela and his nigger goons took over it started going to shit and I believe in 40 years they will be just like zimbabwe

Niggers ruin everything

8ch.net/pol/res/7115342.html
One day…


It's going to shit already.
Mandela was okay, but the current president/PM (forget which) is awful.

Isn't Mauritius a successful African nation?

kek

I mean that's why there aren't successful African nations NOW. It doesn't answer why Africa didn't have successful nations aside from Egypts in ancient years.

Question who cares about a group of people who refuse to get there shit together and work together or do really anything productive

disease and climate and sheeit

Now that's an unfair comparison if ever there was one. You can't lump China and Europe together like that. China wasn't fucked up in the slightest during WWII when compared with what they did to themselves afterwards during the war between PLA and KMT forces, and their Great Leap Forward. That entire country was a self-inflicted ruin with obscene government mandated murder rates of undesirables and mass starvation up until the fucking '80s. Their rise from worst place on the planet to borderline superpower came in the span of 30 god damn years. There is zero excuse.

attempt

So, where were the successful African nations (subs-Saharan) before colonization? They were living in mud huts and cannibalizing each other because they are low IQ and savage. Colonization was the best thing to happen to them without it Africa wouldn't be experiencing the population boom it is now.


You mean like a bubonic plague wiping out half of your population and constant invasion by Arabs and mongol hordes….oh wait that's Europe! African nations are shit despite going through less external strife than European ones, reason being is that they are not very intelligent.

How do you respond to this kind of shit?

I don't because the problem with Africa is Africans. Do you want us to go in and civilize them again? Oh wait…. MUH EBIL COLOLALWISM

are you saying china proved it can be done, ergo africa has no excuse for its development lag?
If so, you fail to account for structural differences such as the fact that china is vast and unified with the same party in govt since 1917. It also boasts a complex civiliation and fairly homogenous culture since pre christian times. None of this is true of Africa.

...

He is delusional. The reason why chinks have accomplished this much is because they are smart automatons.

Africa had virtually NO external difficulties except war.

Europe and Asia had cold, plagues, famine, religious persecution,etc.

Africa had war.

And yet Europe became so insanely ridiculously better at war that subjugating Africa was about as difficult as disciplining a puppy.

This is pretty much definitive proof that Africans are failures compared to other races.

the 2nd, 6th and 9th most expensive cities in the world are african. Niggers pay to live there in large numbers. 3 of the top ten most expensive cities are chinese.

Many African countries are major exporters of oil, diamonds, gold and other precious metals. Most, if not all, African countries have far greater prospects when it comes to natural resources than the majority of Europe.

Expensive how? You realize that statement has nothing to do with anything, right?


Top 9 most expensive cities to live in (business insider):

1. Singapore
2. Zurich
3. Hong Kong
4. Geneva
5. Paris
6. London
7. New York City
8. Copenhagen, Denmark
9. Seoul, South Korea

Alexander the great installed a greek dynasty in egypt, that's why they were successful - they had a good start already with the nile and then they were enhanced by pharoes who were descendants of ancient greeks
and then later on rome conquered them and gave them more benefits like they did later with the celts in gaul and britain

You're profoundly ignorant, user.
Africa has always had its share of disease, famine, climate and religio-ethnic persecution, perhaps more than its fair share even.
Your assertion that Africans were more preoccupied by war than their European contemporaries is also false. Europe was at war in one place and another from Roman times to 1900ish more or less without pause.

It's a completely fair comparison. China was a pile of rubble after WWII. It's the second greatest superpower now.

I just did, though, good sir.

Yeah, it was a VERY rocky road. That's what happens when you choose to be a dirty commie. But look where they are now.

China was a superpower long before they stopped Maoism. They're the only thing that stopped America from purging the commies from North Korea.

No shit. That's the point.

You mean like the 30 years war and the bubonic plague? African nations have never had anything of that magnitude.


And yet they built great civilizations and invented everything we take for granted today. WOW great argument.

That list doesn't come from business insider, or it's outdated.
uk.businessinsider.com/the-19-most-expensive-cities-in-the-world-2016-6?r=US&IR=T
why make these things up? did you hope i wouldn't check?

Still It's completely irrelevant. How does high cost of goods and services= good place to live in? You should measure countries by their GDP and intellectual achievements.

It even says in that article that the list is adjusted for their massively inflated currency
Of course it costs more to live in africa when ZIM$100000000 will buy you a can of coke

lol yes, if cost of living is the measurement, then the barren icy wasteland of Canada's northern territories are heaven on earth

The problem with Africa is political instability and insecure property rights t b h

That's why Asia's doing well and it's why it did better under colonialism

South Africa still has decent stability, but not really since inflation, taxes, affirmative action shit

Cost of living isn't a measure of prosperity or advancement, you are cherry picking. What about GDP and crime rates?


Yeah, way better than living in an african slum where I have to sell my left nut for a piece of moldy bread.

that's always subjective. I'd hate living full-time in america, they'd need an armoured assault group and then probably a crane to get you out of your Minnesota basement.
Besides, i was questioning the fallacy that Africa is still an 18th century mud-hut type continent, teeming with lepers who have never owned 5 bucks worth of anything in their lives.

Well I am. I'm the guy he responded to.


That's bullshit, though. The Commies were fighting the Republic of China even after WWII.

Because they're not a bunch of primitive niggers.

ISHYGDDT

What does this even mean? It's not a coherent thought.


Compared with the Western and east Asian world, Africa is an extremely impoverished place with low standards of living and incredibly high rates of crime and violence.

oops

...

...

...

...

Ireland.

Interesting

Ok Op go thire yourself and see what's up, then you try and help fix it. You seem to care so much send some money, but you won't because you're a sjw and that's all sjw do spread "awareness" by complaining then doing nothing at all, but at least you say all the right things, like Africa, resources, colonization, it almost sounds like you care.

Let's look at pre-colonial Africa, when Europe was in the slump of the middle ages.

Africa had no Black Death.

Africa had no political vacuum from the fall of the Roman Empire or a similar civilization.

Africa had no oppressive central religious authority such as the Vatican actively promoting fundamentalism and discouraging critical thought.

Africa did not have the overcrowding that Europe had - it was a HUGE continent with vast tracts of land unused and unexplored.

Africa had an unrivalled abundance of natural resources that no one had yet made the slightest dent in.

Africa had a monopoly on the largest land mammal in existence - the African elephant - which if domesticated and trained for war (yes this can be done with elephants, see Alexander's failed invasion of India), would have thoroughly trounced the cavalry of any of their neighbours.

They had timber enough to build a navy that could dominate both oceans their coasts opened onto.

And in all the many centuries they were left to their own devices, they remained a collection of largely nomadic hunter-gatherer societies (the few exceptions to which, such as the "kingdom" of "Great" Zimbabwe, never advanced to even a Bronze Age equivalent before dying out).

With all of this in mind, how can there be any doubt that, regardless of foreign interference, the natives of Africa simply lack the capacity for vision, innovation and community that has marked every other race's leaps forward in history?

Sage in Holla Forums it takes a special kind of autist to do this.

If we didn't colonize anything then we wouldn't have any niggers or sand niggers in our mists.

Colonization was good for darkies and other savages. But bad for whitey and his future health.