In 1991, the same year that Agenda 21 was established by the UN, an NGO called Wildlands Project was set up to carry out the goals of another UN treaty.
The Wildlands Project is working hard to set up a continent-wide network of zones meant for animals only with little to no humans. Rural land is being snapped up for conservation. The endgame is that everyone will be relocated from the country to pozzed up cities.
The Wildlands Project NGO is working with local conservation groups across the US and Canada to act out the plans.
Christian Ross
So that's where I should go innawoods? Got it
Caleb Bailey
The goal is to not allow humans in these areas and they are using aerial photography proliberty.com/observer/20080114.htm Read "The Network" section
Jason Smith
...
Justin Nguyen
...
Jaxson Gomez
...
Charles Parker
...
Oliver Hernandez
...
Jace Rivera
It's not a threat, it's another crank idea by ecocentrist conservationists who are extremely focused on rewilding.
Modern conservationists for the most part wouldn't approve of this, I know because I interact with them.
I don't think Agenda 21 has a goal of depopulation either, it seems to me that the environmental aspects of it are simply just focused on increasing governmental power. It wouldn't make sense for it to be focused on crank plots, because of a lot of the projects involved can often be very locally focused (Local Agenda 21).
That being said I don't agree with it, but that is what I know from my brainwashing Agenda 21 class and research
Read up on this because it's happening in your town too and if you don't give a fuck what makes you think the normalfags will do anything about it?
Control freaks are at the top are using virtue signalling in the masses to carry out their end goals. There's big money and globalists calling the shots. Dig, faggots. Oldfag out.
Kevin Richardson
Those are some good examples of NGOs in bed with corporations.
I'd like to see conservation focused on more local scales, I think in the modern conservation movement there is more progress towards this.
We need to be really active though, and try to help push environmental protection towards the more rational end of the political spectrum.
There are literally few if any conservationists that truly agree with this shit, modern conservation (even in the political aspect) is focused on ecosystem services, which is very focused on human integration.
pol knows so little
Levi Collins
Meanwhile, that land needs to be preserved, because it's a lot prettier than the people who it has been given to.
Henry Thomas
you speciesist bigot.
Elijah Sanchez
what really bums me out about our government is stuff like this.
ZOG and NWO shit pisses me off and just makes me a better shot, but this just saddens me.
Stuff like this i would actually support if i could trust the government to actually want this land to help preserve the beauty of the land we conquer from feather niggers. But i know theyre just trying to get more collateral for the debt and force us all to live in cities where they can control us.
Nolan Moore
acknowledged
John Baker
You have to understand, (((They))) want battery farmed humans, not free range. God created the world for (((them))), not for filthy goy to run around trashing with pollution and over-crowding.
webm related: the goyim are the turkeys.
Lucas Brooks
What about the indians? They are living on the reserves. They are de facto nations. We should tell them about this.
Tyler Moore
This is bullshit. We need these wildlands. I wish people would respect the wild so the government doesn't have to do this
Luke Brown
I'm sure people thought the UN was fun and cute 40 years ago too.
Adam Gutierrez
Looks like a way to cut off the coast from the heartland.
Kayden Jackson
All bullshit to allow federal control over rich rare earth minerals
Andrew Reed
Should I be buying property in an East Coast city then?
If Agenda 21 goes as planned wouldn't property value rise?
