Dilbert thread

How did Scott Adams become the most based person in newspaper comics?

Other urls found in this thread:

blog.dilbert.com/post/145456082991/my-endorsement-for-president-of-the-united-states
dilbert.com/
archive.is/zH5nr#selection-661.1-661.156
blog.dilbert.com/post/146157026376/how-to-un-hypnotize-a-rabid-anti-trumper
dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_enforcement_ar_2013.pdf
bigstory.ap.org/article/8015402c7480430badfe47df502eaa19/ap-exclusive-drones-patrol-half-mexico-border
pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-the-foreign-born-population-in-the-united-states-key-charts/#2013-fb-origin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Militia
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

That not an edit?

It's the actual strip on his webpage. You can see for yourself on Dilbert.com

He was always based.
The difference is that he used to focus much less in politics.

Fucking Dilbert cartoon didn't got a third season.
Family Guy got saved from cancelation

Shame too, that was a great cartoon.

...

"So I’ve decided to endorse Hillary Clinton for President, for my personal safety."
- Scott Adams, blog.dilbert.com/post/145456082991/my-endorsement-for-president-of-the-united-states

Remember when the feminists tried to make him look bad by editing his quotes into his cartoons but what he was saying was so logical that people actually agreed with him? That was the best. I wish I could find those again.

Well, that makes it sound like he's got a gun to his head if he doesn't vote for Hillary.
Doesn't sound too farfetched to me.

Not the most accurate simile. It's appeasment.

tsk.
*Appeasement

That's part of his series on persuasion. I don't think he's actually endorsing Hillary, he's trying to, in our minds, associate assassins and murderers, danger, unstability, etc. with Hilary and the Left.

Post the context, you baiting nigger.

...

It's real, nigga

dilbert.com/

Blame stupid UPN and their willingness to throw away one of the only good shows they had to make stupid shows for black people, like Shasta McNasty.

...

I don't believe he even read it.

He can also accurately predict technical trends.

Clinton successfully pairs herself with Hitler in my mind. What now?

Waste of dubs. Also:
>>>/reddit/

Google "Gary Johnson".

...

...

...

Huh, Antina reminds me of me.

holy fuck this is golden

Notice how Dilbert's tie straightens out

Today's

I don't get it.

He has no balls

This fucker is one strip away from having his face punched in.

That's pretty good.

Speaking of "Tina the Brittle Tech Writer"…

I wonder how many fuckers put B.

Just like in real life, it's going to be women complaining about how worthless men are that results in men replacing them.

scott has had a thing against trump for quite a while

or at least i recall hearing that when i was a kid or teenager

not sure how he feels about trump now though

reading that*

He says in his blog and twitter that he doesn't like Trump but thinks is gonna win anyway.

I think its from a "out-of-touch CEO" perspective more so than from a political one

I remember that the show had some top-tier reaction images.

No, he says he doesn't agree with any of the candidates, but that Trump is a genius. He brings up argument both for and against him, and is written in jest.

His shitposts on twitter definitely show a lean to the right, but his heavy use of satire makes it hard to exactly nail down

...

These are more Holla Forums oriented…

How about this one?

He's Libertarian and he's said as much

Have some semi-related comics that amuse me


I actually have that one saved for whenever I stumble upon an argument involving the NSA and porn

No. He has said the exact opposite. There was a rumor, but that's all it is. See related video.

archive.is/zH5nr#selection-661.1-661.156

Aka he said something I agree with ideologically and now I can't stop sucking his dick.

>lean

aww man i was gunna post that first one

...

Kinda ironic given Trump is basically the Pointy Haired Boss running for President.

Hilary is evil as well but at least competent, Trump basically stumbled into the Presidential race because Republican politicians became parodies of themselves long ago.

What has she ever succeeded at?

...

She married a man and rode off his coattails.

...

Nigger you don't have to like Trump but saying Hillary is competent is completely retarded.

Actually, much better than Drumpf, which sounds like something a literal autistic would say.
(checked)
Kek. He may not be perfect but at least he isn't fucking brainwashed (much).

Hilary didn't win her way this far into the election through competence, expertise, political acumen, or any other positive traits.

Before the election cycle even started, the DNC, the mainstream media, and the Whitehouse decided they wanted her to be the next President, and forced her this far through.

Trump's success is genuine and far more admirable as an example of the people's voice being expressed through voting than Shillary will ever be.

good read
blog.dilbert.com/post/146157026376/how-to-un-hypnotize-a-rabid-anti-trumper

See, this is why no one takes you seriously.

He doesn't literally mean "hypnotize someone with a pendulum", the article gives you several ways of dealing with the main arguments people use against Trump.

The "main argument" against Trump is that he's an authoritarian goon. 8 years of inaction from Obama and Holla Forums flips their shit - and now they turn around and support someone who campaigns on tougher fun laws. I don't give a shit if you've got an "R" next to your name.

I'm not from America and know next to nothing about politics, you think you could explain what makes him authoritarian?

...

Motherfucking Australian shitposter.
I knew it was a bad sign when /aus/ started to gain more UID's.

Try again.

That women has a long history of issues.

I'm always interested to see what "anti-authoritarianism" would look like. I'd be at home for a Rothbard private property society, but only because it would result in more hierarchy than our current society. Is there an anti-authoritarian way to secure the border that doesn't involve the government dropping its monopoly on that? Also,
Did you mean gun? Because you made that typo twice. It's an excellent issue if it wasn't a typo.

This is a red herring, too. We already have patrols of armed guards at every road, track, and trail, stopping all public and private transit, and demanding to see everyone's papers. We have drones taking 24/7 high-resolution wide-spectrum video of nearly the entire stretch with Mexico. Visiting Tombstone or Las Cruces feels like being in the fucking USSR.

are you daft? illegals don't just freely roam the country, they brag about being illegal. the federal government has completely neutered border patrol and immigration services to the point where they can't even depot illegals.

drones taking video of the border? welfare? tighter gun laws? where are you getting this shit from?

Good, a wall would make that even better. But then, why does it take the Madman himself to propose sending 12 million illegals back to Mexico? It really shouldn't be a problem if the government had the will to power to do so. All we've seen, though, is amnesty after amnesty after amnesty. Guess what every other candidate promises mexicans in the country? Give you a hint, it starts with 'a'.

Besides, I don't even want to stop at illegal immigration. I want pics related to not be a thing. Whatever gets us back towards pre-1965 immigration is the best possible thing for our nation.

Shit, missed my pics

dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_enforcement_ar_2013.pdf

Apprehensions are going down, removals are going up. The trend has been this way for a decade. There are less illegal immigrants causing problems, and more being deported.

bigstory.ap.org/article/8015402c7480430badfe47df502eaa19/ap-exclusive-drones-patrol-half-mexico-border
50% coverage, years ago.

Living near the fucking border.


See the above link to the DHS statistics. We're already deporting record numbers of Mexicans.

When a politician tells you that you're in danger, and you need to give up your liberty to be safe, run the fuck away.

So, not even 5% of illegal immigrants deported per year is acceptable to you? Shit, man, that's pathetic. Also, ~33% of those deportations are illegals that were already deported once. Pretty sure that can't be record numbers. Maybe record border jumpers, but illegal immigrants are more than that.

The bigger and more pressing issue, though, is the major demographic shift that is undeniable. I will not be a minority in my own country. That will be a bigger danger to my liberty than even 8 years of Hillary would be. Trump is the only choice to avoid such a fate.

according to your link, apprehensions are way down since obama took office. the report shows graphs from only the past few years to make it seem like there is an increase.
"reinstatements" count for a huge portion of the removals, which are people who were apparently already deported, but returned and were caught again.
even with the three-year time period obfuscation, aliens "returned" appears to be way down (table 11).
in all, it seems like they're doing a pretty shit job, considering the number of illegals in the country is estimated in the tens of millions.

drones patrolling the border is pretty shit, so i'm not sure why you are not keen on trump, who plans to just build a damn wall.

trump has never said anything i know about regarding "giving up liberty." you should be aware that American freedoms and liberties to not apply to those who are not citizens.

Donald Trump supported Affirmative Action, runs a business empire that used foreign labor, has went back and forth on the Great Wall of America, made sure to clarify he’s trying to keep out the “bad” immigrant, has supported Planned Parenthood, and doesn't have it out for Jews.

Seeing Holla Forums posters rally around him is a laugh.


Tough luck. Not even Trump is out to do that. At best, you'll have to settle for keeping out immigrants from (insert bombed nation here) and Mexico under the Trump Administration.

he's the only nationalist and protectionist candidate in this whole election, the only one who isn't thoroughly corrupt and owned by outside interests, the only one who seems genuinely interested in improving his country for all citizens, and you find it laughable Holla Forums supports him? no one said he's perfect, he's just by far the most appealing candidate.

even if any of these claims could be substantiated, they are so very minor considering the current direction of not just this country but western civilization as a whole, and where we will end up should he fail to win this election.
you seem more interested in antagonizing Holla Forums than actually discussing flaws in Trump's policies.

tell me, who would you vote for?

You probably deserve deportation. Our next president will have a big effect on this graph.

pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-the-foreign-born-population-in-the-united-states-key-charts/#2013-fb-origin

All that matters is what that effect will be. We know for sure what any other candidate will do. Even if I admit Trump might not have the effect I want, I'd still be retarded not to at least vote for him.

MONTANA MUST BE QUARANTINED!

Haha us canadians are taking over whatever that purple state is

It's called Wyoming

The Canadian Border wall just got 10 feet higher.

Why do I find it so hilarious that Michigan is getting infested by Allah's warriors
Did they get together and think of the single weakest state to conquer before signing off their registration for the visas?

I think it's more "Canadian refugees from the pakis" than taking over. Expect an influx of butthurt burgers and spics come Trump to power.

That's because he's of the class that normally is the outside interest that exploits the corruption of the American political class, who has just decided to cut out the middleman.

the arabs are mostly concentrated in shitholes around detroit, like dearborn. it's nothing we can't deal with when the time comes.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Militia

...

I wish they'd make something of that rebellion. Work clothes in general are a bizarre mutation of fashion that are designed to be impractical for both genders.

Honestly, any job that requires you to wear pants in summer is already pushing things.. But jobs that require full suit and tie are just moronic.

So what?

He's said he tried to make as much money as possible. He's stated that as president he wanted to make the most profitable course of action be to use American workers.

He's said he'd negotiate it. It's been a hallmark of his campaign that he'd state he'd negotiate things because he purports to be a deal maker.

He's stated he would put up a big beautiful wall and have a door in that wall which people could come through legally. So yes, he wants to keep out those bad (or in other words illegal) immigrants and has also spoken about limiting visas to help protect American jobs.

He's stated that they do nice work in prenatal care. Which they do.

Republicans typically dislike PP because of abortions, which Trump has said he'd want to defund PP unless they give up doing abortions which is in line with what Republicans have wanted.

He's talked about having other countries such as Israel pay for their own defense as well as how he wasn't interested in invading places like Syria. Instead he's suggested going into Syria to help create a safe zone so that they didn't have to have refugees come here.

That's fairly anti-Jew politics.

Pretty fucked up how bad politics is now.

I'll be honest, I don't like Trump but the alternative is Hellary. We're all doomed.

I wish there was a better anti-SJW candidate.

Join the growing Libertarian vote, or whatever 3rd party you find represents you best. Yeah, it may be borderline impossible for one to win as-is, but think of it this way:

They say your vote is your voice. Well that voice can only say one thing: "I want that."

You might be holding your nose at the voting booth, but voting for the lesser of two evils is still saying you want the evil, or at least your urge to pick a "winning" candidate supersedes your displeasure with the establishment.

Watch for the full ballot info not to be displayed. That's when you know that at least one of the outliers is nipping uncomfortably at their heels and they want to hide the fact to pretend that the dark horses still have no chance.

Gary Johnson will save us

No thanks.

We interpret your daily political circlejerk to bring you the newest strips for this week

Save us from what?

A choice between Orange Stalin and Thatcher 2.0

Won't actually win anything though and is hardly a good Libertarian himself, but OK.