California Senate approves sweeping Gun Control measures

cbs8.com/story/32022362/california-senate-approves-sweeping-gun-control-measures

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Democrats in the California Senate approved a wide-ranging series of gun control bills Thursday, reviving an effort to significantly tighten California's already strict gun laws in the wake of last year's terrorist attack in San Bernardino.

Lawmakers voted to outlaw the sale of assault weapons with easily detachable magazines and to require that people turn in magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. They also backed a variety of other measures aimed at restricting access to guns and ammunition or limiting the carnage they can inflict.

The effort drew a sharp rebuke from gun rights supporters who say squeezing lawful gun owners even further won't make people safer.

It also laid bare tense differences in personality and strategy between senior California Democrats. Legislative leaders are rushing to head off a ballot measure advocated by Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow Democrat, asking voters to enact many of the same policies. They worry the initiative will fail at the ballot box or fire up gun rights supporters, potentially increasing turnout of conservative voters who could give Republicans an edge in close districts.

California's assault-weapon ban prohibits new rifles with magazines that can be detached without the aid of tools. To get around the law, gun makers developed so called bullet buttons that allow a shooter to quickly dislodge the magazine using the tip of a bullet or other small tool.

"They are designed only to facilitate the maximum destruction of human life," said Sen. Isadore Hall, D-Compton, who co-wrote the bullet-button ban.

Law enforcement officials recovered two rifles and two handguns after the San Bernardino attack. Both types of rifles are sold with bullet buttons.

It's illegal in California to sell magazines holding more than 10 rounds or to bring them into the state, but people who already owned them are allowed to keep them. Senators voted Thursday to outlaw possession of a high-capacity magazine, essentially forcing owners to give them up or run afoul of the law.

Outlawing bullet buttons and high-capacity magazines is a priority for gun control advocates, who hope that making it harder to reload would slow down a shooter and give bystanders time to escape or intervene. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013 vetoed the Legislature's last attempt to ban bullet buttons, saying it was too far-reaching. A high-capacity magazine ban failed in the state Assembly that year.

The debate has fallen along familiar lines, with Democrats advocating a crackdown on guns in the name of safety and Republicans saying that tougher gun laws only hinder people intent on following the law.

"Gun ownership is a constitutional bedrock," said Sen. Ted Gaines, R-El Dorado Hills. "We can't smash the 2nd Amendment into a million pieces and expect America to be as free and strong as it's always been."

Senators approved 11 gun-related bills in total.

They include regulations for homemade firearms, background checks for ammunition purchases, a mandate to report lost or stolen guns, a ban on loaning firearms to friends and funding for a gun-violence research center.

The debate in the Senate comes as Newsom, a Democrat running for governor in 2018, is advocating a November gun control ballot measure incorporating many of the policies the Senate backed Thursday.

Other urls found in this thread:

ipfs.io/ipfs/QmQwM1NvPptx1BVcdz3NCKchRDs2TWBkjLGCALRhTCqvjU/Flag_of_Commiefornia.svg
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, said he's also concerned that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's campaign will drive more right-leaning voters to the polls and imperil the gun-control initiative.

"I think it's too risky to put a lot of hard work, decades of hard work, before the voters of California. We don't know if it passes or not," de Leon said. "But if we can get it done in the legislative body, the question is, why not do it?"

De Leon wrote to Newsom last month asking him to hold off on his initiative and allow lawmakers to tackle the problem. Newsom declined.

The measures go to the state Assembly, where Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount, and other Democrats have publicly backed some of the policies approved by the Senate. But they could face a roadblock with moderate Democrats who have watered down or halted legislation from the more liberal Senate.

The initiative isn't going away, said Dan Newman, a campaign strategist working on the campaign. The initiative takes a different approach to tracking ammunition purchases and also requires vendors to report lost or stolen ammunition.

"It's one of those situations where more is more," Newman said. "The NRA is so powerful, and the gun violence tragedies are so frequent and so horrific, we need to take bold action in every way possible."

Gun rights advocates blasted the Senate for rushing the legislation to meet a deadline at the end of June for Newsom to withdraw his initiative.

"It is nothing short of unconscionable that millions of law-abiding Californians are being used as chess pieces in a twisted political game to see who can race to the bottom first," said Craig DeLuz, legislative advocate for the gun rights group Firearms Policy Coalition.

...

Califags, it's time to move out. Spend the rest of this year making and saving as much money as possible. Look for other opportunities in other states. Yes you may get a pay cut but your cost of living is much lower.

Is it time to start killing people?

Pants on head retarded.

no

Yes but it's not going to happen.

I hate living here. It is a liberal hellhole, I need to move out but I'm not sure where to go, I'm looking at Indiana or somewhere on the east coast. Pay doesn't matter, I make my living online. I'm looking for a nice non ghetto area basically, anywhere but southern California where (in my town) the homes are a fucking million dollars, and everyone expects me to just stay here for the rest of my life until I can afford one. Fuck that.

...

Those last two webms are from the Costa Mesa chimpouts, and in one week, at Trump's San Diego rally, I expect an even bigger chimpout. The town is pretty much right on the fucking border. Massive happening expected.

They want to take away our bullet-buttons!!!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

At least it only passed in the senate and not the house. Oh man, we can't elect Trump fast enough!

Gun dealers are about to make a serious profit from the prohibition. Good job, Commiefornia.

run goyim. flee your homes. dont fight, capitulate.

MAGA

Fight for what?

Please tell me what is worth fighting for in California? It can't be saved just like Detroit couldn't.

The geography around Yosemite would make it near impenetrable, would stay out of the valley floor though. Nothing worth saving in the cities by the wilderness and the farmland is worth fighting for

I feel bad for you califags, but you gotta admit that your state will forever prove that gun control never works.

SINK ALREADY COMMIEFORNIA

Former Indy resident. You can get the type of home people would consider a "dream home" for 250-300k depending on how nice of an area you want to live in. Lots of land to be had, if you're into that, and people generally leave you be.

Even if you don't have that kind of money, and want housing, I was renting a nice house (hard wood floors, finished basement, 2 bed, 2 bath) for 740 a month.

Roads and infrastructure make sense, mostly white people, lots of tech jobs. Downside is, there is very little to do outside of Indianapolis, so if you're social you may want to live close to Indianapolis.

overall 8/10 would live there again.

THE WALL AROUND CALIFORNIA JUST GOT 88 FT HIGHER

I can hardly wait for the primary/general results when the libs will chimp out there and mass suicide.

That'd be over 2k a month easily where I live. And that home is definitely affordable.

In 1993 we voted YES on prop 187 (explained here: ), which passed with about 60% in favor, then a fag judge named William Matthew Byrne, Jr. overruled our democratic vote and said "you guys can't do that it violates undocumented workers' rights :((((". And from then on, California sank further and further. The end.

...

If we had a real president, he'd take California to court for violating the 2nd Amendment.

Such is the mind of a libtard.

What do you do to make money online, if it's ok to ask?

What the fuck is your pic supposed to say, OP?

Just sabotage the water supply & watch the illegals all die of thirst.

dupe in video games and RWT the items

it's very lucrative if you know the right games

OK, I get the "real world trade" reference…do you mean you mine virtual gold & sell it?

Basically. I find a bug in an MMO that allows me to duplicate in game items, then I use it until it gets patched. Been using and selling items from one for the past ~6 months.

Oh…"duplicate"
I get you.

I would ask you to give us more info but I don't want your well to dry up.

Thanks.
Not smart enough to do that myself, so I'll have to figure something else out.

It's actually

You're one of the few who thinks that way, thanks lol. If you want to look for exploits, you have to be creative and try random things.


Good luck, there's a lot of avenues out there but you just have to find your niche.

Oh yeah, forgot to say. If you're interested, learn to program. It's a great skill.

People's Republic of California

As someone stuck in Commiefornia, I will happily join in the inevitable class action lawsuit that will be filed the day after this gets signed.

We actually do have a really good case since the most recent Supreme Court standard was "in the common use" and the AR-15 and variants are the most common rifle in the US right now.

those look like ф's to me not о's

...

SVG:
ipfs.io/ipfs/QmQwM1NvPptx1BVcdz3NCKchRDs2TWBkjLGCALRhTCqvjU/Flag_of_Commiefornia.svg

That's a very accurate "what if" flag, except for the denomination (which is correct) being on it