Why do child rapists have a bad rap? If children didn't want to be raped, they wouldn't dress like sluts.
Why do child rapists have a bad rap? If children didn't want to be raped, they...
Other urls found in this thread:
I don't understand. What do you mean children dress like sluts? What kind of clothes do they wear, exactly?
If God™ didn't want men to have sex with little girls, why did he make them so sexy?
Just look at any pedo/hebe board and you'll see how kids dress.
Totally begging for it if you ask me.
If you are talking about children, why do you post pic of yong teen. She look between 12 and 14.
OP's ugly face is just begging for suicide.
death by snu snu?
She's actually 10.
god bless monsanto.
but also fuck them for a bunch of other reasons.
Is you inner pedophile coming out? Rationalizing her into being pubescent?
she's at least 14, you don't have to be a pedo to realize this.
Made some OC
is she expressing the number of virginities she's taken with her hand there?
You're gonna buy a van and start cruising the parks, aren't you?
implying I don't already do this
whitetrash/nigger parents dressing their kids inappropriately means kids know what they're doing
"Most girls as young as 6 are already beginning to think of themselves as sex objects, according to a new study of elementary school-age kids in the Midwest."
Why 6-Year-Old Girls Want to Be Sexy
Wow, most girls are still dumb and still can't control their behavioral instincts. More at 11.
Don't be blind to how boys are doing this too, it's just harder to notice, as effeminate boys are still trying to look 'sexier' too. If homoerotic-pedophiles browsed imageboards instead of joining church, you would understand.
Shocker, people who want to discourage X create a stigma about X while different people take steps to encourage X.
why are you talking about my X?
Um church is a great place to meet kids. Even more so. Parents think you're a xtian, therefore there is a level of trust already granted.
Why 6-Year-Old Girls Want to Be Sexy
They don't want to be sexy, they are just mimicking the things they see on the TV and the internet. It's the social environment that is making them act this way, not the kids themselves. A child as young as 6 doesn't even understand the concept of being a sex object, unless she was sexually abused.
meant to bump
Feels good to live in a country where you can legally fuck 13 years old woman
Fuck you murifats
They want to be popular not to be raped retards.
Well they will be very popular when they get rapped
where you can legally fuck 13 years old woman
Judging by that horrible grammar, i'm guessing you are a shitskin from some Spanish speaking country.
maybe she wants the d. but of some boy of her age instead of a 40 year old autist
What grammatical mistakes have i done?
*13 year old
Is she is old enough to get pregnant then she is old enough to be considered a woman
You're an idiot. I wasn't even making that argument.
13 years ol
Is it grammatically correct now?
Sadly mainly species on this planet develop the ability to reproduce before the brain fully develops. For some women it never happens.
The girl you posted looks 16 which isn't a "child" and is perfectly legal in most countries.
That seems more like right wing conservative propaganda. Kids apparently can't be sexy, so find a scapegoat to lay the blame there.
Don't talk to me about church, Satan
That seems more like right wing conservative propaganda
No, it seems like a rational response to what is going on. Would I be left wing if I said "little girls love being sexual objects". They are just little kids. Do you remember being one?
The faster they recognize their true role the better
Yes it would be more left wing, since it would be taking a more liberal stance and accepting the fact that children are human beings with sexuality. I do remember as a 5 year old, seeing the shower scene in Porky's, and getting a raging hard on. And finding Playboys in the woods. I guess I didn't grow up in a bubble like you apparently did.
children are human beings with sexuality
Children are human beings, yes, I agree. However, they are still prepubescent and don't have hormones rushing through their bodies yet. They also don't understand sexual relations between adults. All they do is mimic what they see on TV and the internet, like I said before. It's "monkey see, monkey do".
don't have hormones
Well that's not good. They should see an endocrinologist about that. You're not supposed to have 0 hormones.
OH! You're talking about testosterone and progesterone and oestrogen production that increases in puberty! I see now. Those are not the only hormones in the human body, user. There are other hormones that do other things.
Also, yes children do have those hormones, they just start producing more of it later in life.
they are still prepubescent and don't have hormones rushing through their bodies yet
He didn't say they lacked hormones, idiot.
Also, yes children do have those hormones, they just start producing more of it later in life.
Yep, they do, but the amount they have as children doesn't even compare to the amount in pubescent children and adults. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Gosh I wonder what makes children want to be sexualized? Hmmmmm
it's just a coincidence
It's nature vs nurture. While these is nurturing via the environment, there is a nature side. To imply sole nurturing, is bullshit.
Well I am from a shitty Spanish country as well and we can't do that so freely.
where are you from user?
It's nature vs nurture
Was there a problem with kids labeling themselves as being sexual objects in the past? Please cite your sources. Thanks in advance.
It's quite a taboo subject, and I can only speak from a male perspective. As a child I was getting erections at the sight of naked women.
As a child I was getting erections at the sight of naked women.
Does that make you a sexual object? No, it makes you a horny individual. We are talking about children embracing the fact that they are sexual objects. It's not even a thing, only the onlookers see them as sexual objects, not the children themselves.
Males and females are different. Females are the object of male sexual desire, and I was experieincing it at a young age. Just how young an age that occurs is difficult to determine because it's such a taboo subject. Most would rather live in a world where children aren't sexual.
You were being aroused by adult females, not preteen females. This all trails back to what I was currently talking about. Preteen girls aren't sexual objects and don't think of themselves as such.
Being aroused is showing the male side of sexuality that occurs at a young age. The point is it's there. Obviously preteen females do think of themselves as sex objects; the link above heavily suggests it.
Being aroused is showing the male side of sexuality that occurs at a young age.
Yeah know, I used to beat off to porn at fucking 8, but that doesn't make me a sex object. I also never sexually objectified my peers, just grown women.
Obviously preteen females do think of themselves as sex objects; the link above heavily suggests it.
Which link? Preteen girls are doing what they think is right. They are binding to what society thinks is right. I grew up in the 90's and never remember girls pretending to be sex objects, because the media wasn't actively trying to turn them into one. Not they are, the media wants to turn little girls into sex objects.
I said males and females are different. Now we have two cases of male sex drive occuring at a young age. Males aren't meant to be sex objects.
The nineties were very different. During that era, feminism had a much firmer grasp on society, and they depicted female objectification as a social issue. Yes, they still do it, but it seems to be to a much lesser degree.
I said males and females are different.
So what? Are you saying that prepubescent females magically have more estrogen hormones and turn into ultra sluts when they are only 6?
They have a limited amount of hormones when they are kids, just like boys.
No. Males do not try to be sex objects. There is sexuality present in both genders, but in different forms. He acts, she is the object acted upon.
Nice opinion. If there is any evidence to back this up, please post it. I'll wait because there is none. Girls have sexual desire against boys when they are young too, that doesn't make boys sexs objects.
They don't irl, only on the internet.
I gave far more evidence than you offered. A person with no social skills can't understand the differences between genders can't be reasoned with.
So you are just pretty much giving up?
A person with no social skills can't understand the differences
A person with actual social skills wouldn't give up like this. They would call the person out and describe why they fail at life. You are basically admitting that you have no social skills by making this comment.
wtf country is this?
Looks like someones missing his hebe board
One of the few people who isn't mentally fucking retarded on this thread
You're insisting males and females are the same in the sense of being sex objects. How can someone who is uninformed be reasoned with?
You're insisting males and females are the same in the sense of being sex objects.
Nope, I am saying that both male and females aren't sexual objects. Can you read text?
people with no social skills are among the only people who can be reasoned with.
Now is the time to lower the global Age of Consent to 4 years of age.
get on a bus
see a beautiful girl
think she is about 20-25
wanna ask her number
she opens her mouth
she starts talking to some kids who are like 9
realize she is a part of a kindergarten group, and she is not the nurse
how was I to know she was only 4 years old?
I wouldn't have a problem with that
2 years of age would be better
Normally I too would be going MODS get these gay fuckers.
But when the leaders of our society Gay @NCATNSW Judges say nothing is wrong with gay marriage activists pushing their cocks through 22 month old Russian infant arses, and it's a hate crime of homosexual vilification under the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 to hate Australian government sponsored (via passport without DNA test) human trafficking / ABC state media praised Gay dads fucking Russian baby boys (pictured here as hosted on Greatest Gay Marriage Activist Website in Singapore - uploaded 8 months after baby fuckers arrested) say the sexual union between gay marriage activist and boy is SO RIGHT AND PROPER it's a crime to say it's wrong, how bad can they be?
Also Pedo Foreign Minister Bob Carr and Alex Greenwich MP said after Russia cut off supply of gay men paying cash for Russian Rape Victims for global Gay Marriage Activist baby fucking tours it was a homophobic act, and used it to petition to kick Russia out of the G20.
Finally have a listen to the baby anal fuckers as confirmed by the US supreme court (hint: read my blog for the link) say it's homophobic to oppose them! archive.org
P.S. Devils advocate
First Gay Singaporian to open a gay orgy bar hence their greatest gay activist put's up gay dads rape victims to to be poster boys for Gay Marriage. Wordpress says it's wrong to remove the name and image of a child rape victim being used the further the cause of his rapists, because that's homophobic.
Imagine if it was the crime of hetrophobia was not to love human trafficking, infant rape and public shaming of child rape victims if heterosexuals did it too! This is one thing I don't want equal rights with homosexual with. Let them all be known as the state loved baby fuckers, not the heterosexuals.
P.s. If you say that you get banned from /aus/ for not being a baby anal fucker lover. If you want to uncle someone uncle the /aus/ commie kid fuck lovers club. It's no surprise to see it on Holla Forums I'm only here to fuck with 8ch.net management exposing their more tame forums as being worse than be where the BOs (moderators) love those who fuck babies and ban you for not loving baby anal too!
"Feels good to live in a country where you can legally fuck 13 years old woman"
"Feels good to live in a country where you can legally fuck 13-year-old women" is correct (year singular, woman plural, and the hyphenated phrase is better for age because it ties "old" to year rather than to "women". "13 year old women" is correct, but it could also mean thirteen women who were each a year old.
"What's the best part about fucking twenty three year olds? There are twenty of them."
i was horny since i was 6
fuck your bullshit
Nah, I've seen teenage girls dress kinda lewd nowadays.
People who resort to correcting other people's grammar in an argument are simply pathetic.
So wait user I didn't read all what you wrote but roughly you mean that if I become a fag I can do whatever I want with with a loli and I won't go to jail?
Not that user, but if you agree with another user to be gay and adopt a loli as a gay couple you might both adopt and use the chick together.
Imagine DP'ing a sweet little broad.
Sounds good fucking enough for me, is there any other user interested in being my butt-lover? We can get a third user and recreate that manga of the pomf meme (I don't remember the name sorry)
Hey, he asked what was wrong.
Is this chld asking for?
Absolutely. His eyes say "pork me in the ass, and buy me ice cream afterwards".
"god bless monsanto."
I'll do it.
ITT all this "sex object" talk
You'd think so, huh?
Thank God for Monsanto, childhood obesity, and/or very healthy food only a few can afford if they don't own a farm.
Or a handsome man, like a young jock or singer, like Justin Beiber. Or a handsome middle aged man.
So Asia doesn't have age of consent laws?
technically, no place has age of consent laws if they can't prove that you committed the act
most sexual assault charges are thrown out the window, unless you're black