I don't have infographics but I can help you connect some dots.
I'm an entrepreneur. Like a lot of my ilk, I'm in the tech/software industry. Unlike my peers, I detest venture capital and think our business is monstrously over-hyped.
Look at he valuation or market cap of some tech companies:
This is down from a $33 Billion market cap at one point
Now let's look at some other companies by valuation or market cap.
So think about this. Tech has a place and it's important, but do you think it's REALLY worth that much? My thesis is as follows:
Tech companies are the recipients of largess from investors and VC firms, themeselves connected to hedge funds and investment banks which have been growing fat off of QE and other reckless money creation policies.
The growth in the money supply is finding its way into one sector more than others: investment. The way that money makes it to companies is via VC and hedge funds playing in the tech sector- at least primarily.
The boom in tech is completely artificial. The valuation of these companies is either the result of reckless investment or criminal collusion. Moreover, look at the spending in these companies. Look at how Air BnB is spending its cash: flashy offices, large and heavily staffed offices around the world. They're not profitable yet, remember that. They don't need these huge offices, they only need law firms on retainer in the countries within which they operate, maybe some native language speakers at their home office in the US or via a call center agency.
So here's the really subversive thing- it's nurtured a very unhealthy culture among entrepreneurs. Every accelerator, every young CEO, everyone thinks they need venture capital. Everyone thinks they need to leech off of a VC firm and use their money to hire overpriced MBA's to do business dev and dump money out to Microsoft, Facebook, etc. for software products, infrastructure, and advertising.
It's bullshit. There is a growing group of tech entrepreneurs who reject ALL of this. We use open source as often as possible to bring down costs, we try to wage our own marketing and PR campaigns, we reject VC money and advances, and we're aware of our own value.
I've spoken with some Venture Capital managers, they'll privately agree after a few drinks too. The companies doing the work themselves, trying to bootstrap, and being diligent with their spending are MUCH (in their estimation) more likely to succeed than their peers who immediately seek VC money before or as-of their Minimally Viable Product. Thus, that's why VC firms go after small companies like mine so hard.
I know others who can't get VC to return calls, I get calls out of the blue. I get drinks paid for at the bar during local entrepreneur events when they figure out who I am.
This is for a reason. VC is a tool. The owners know the valuations they give out are ridiculous in many cases, they don't care. They want their piece. The financial "class" wants their hands on the disruptive technologies and companies of the future without doing the legwork. They know they're playing with monopoly money and the crash is coming, thus they're hedging bets by buying up as much stake as possible in the companies that would lead an economic recovery- or at least weather the storm and come out functional.