He's voting for Hillary

It is required to enter a subject when starting a new thread on this board
fucking faggots

who he is?

...

...

...

...

Yeah, that's totally better

Nice 5's. Too bad they weren't a pair of chapter 11's

and voting for a criminal who is embedded with corruption dating back to the 70's is better? I'd rather vote for the guy that is self funding and hasn't been corrupted by politics.

found the butthurt tumblrina

Now that's a good rapeface - i'm going to have to get a mask like that.

Holla Forums is tumblr for basement kids with delusions of grandeur.

I agree, but what does that have to do with my post?

Are we not making assumptions about where people lurk based on short posts now?

She may be a bit of a shady and careless cunt, but she has never been convicted of anything… ever. They can still charge her with something – nothing is stopping them. They DON'T, because they know they don't have grounds, or at least the evidence is too weak to warrant all the money they would have to spend on a drawn out case that they'd probably lose.

That's false.

Sure, Clinton's Wall Street ties concern me – just not nearly as much as all of the intangibles that would come along with a volitile narcissist who would undoubtedly destroy foreign relations.

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but Trump is just absurd lol.

I bet you are some fatass neckbeard that secretly uses 4chan and dresses up as a furry on the weekends

Because of her status. You are probably some kid that read and article on snopes about benghazi and think she is completely innocent. Do yourself a favor and read up about "whitewater". The evidence is all out there, it's not some conspiracy theory like the MSM makes it out to be.

Prove it.

I have heard this opinion before many time. This is the general consensus of people who regularly watch mainstream media. Take some time and dig up the corruption involved with Hillary. Don't just watch CNN and think you know everything. After you do this, Trump will seem like a saint.

I don't think Trump is a true hero or anything, but compared to Hillary he is a pretty damned good candidate.

I bet you're an unfunny faggot who tries too hard.

He's certainly the lesser of two evils. It's not like he ever killed anyone or something, HILLARY.

I bet you are an extremely nice guy with a good sense of humor who works out everyday and has a really nice body.

Conjecture

Not even once

I'm familiar, and my position did not change.

Not exactly, but if you're referring to Hillary as a criminal, that's a bit of hyperbole.

You're the one making the claim, dipshit. Look it up on opensecrets.org, I'm not gonna fuckin do the work for you.

You're making quite a few assumptions. Any others that you'd like to get out of the way?

Alright, I'm convinced you are either b8ing or are literally from tumblr, therefore I'm not going to respond to you anymore.

8/10 if b8

Lol. You're a fucking moron.
I realize its completely irrational, but after all the shameless politicization of that incident, I almost feel glad those faggots died… fuck em.

You've bought into the most epic b8 of the 21st century, you gullible faggot – his name is Donald fucking Trump.

Well, it's a start, at least. You need to lay off those blue pills.

You keep claiming that these people aren't bringing anything to the table yet you consistently bring nothing to the table. The hypocrisy is unbelievable.

Is it unbelievable? Are you unable to believe your opinion that I've brought nothing to the table? Un. Be. Lievable.

You don't seem to understand how burden-of-proof works.
First of all, these things are barely deserving of a response in the first place, much less a well-constructed one. Also, I dont believe there's a single piece of evidence that would prove any of these claims, so they're wrong until proven otherwise.

Found the Christfag

Debating creationists on the topic of evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon — it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.
- Scott D. Weitzenhoffer

...

No one mentioned Christ or creationism. I'm sorry to say that you have been found out, my fedoraed friend. :^)

Clinton is a criminal, why would the FBI be currently investigating her if she weren't? She broke 3 separate laws in regards to her email use alone. She also completely destroyed Libya and turned it into an ISIS breeding ground, but that's just the aftermath.

She also used private investigators back in the 90s to threaten Bill's rape/sexual assault victims. Look it up, i'm not going to spoon feed you.

This woman is a criminal, there is no way around it. Just because she hasn't been convicted due to her status as the wife of a former president doesn't make her innocent.

You (((big nosed retard))), that's the original quote.

She's reckless, careless, and irresponsible – does that mean she's a criminal? No, at least not according to the laws that you seem to be misinterpreting. And the Director of the FBI seems to feel the same.
That's a blacklivesmatter, nigger-tier fucking argument

The DOJ still has the option to pursue a case, and they don't because of the reasons I listed earlier – no grounds. There is no evidence of CRIMINAL INTENT (this is what they need).

Lol. Don't bother linking a source, dumbass.

She fucking broke the law, literally. It's not a suggestion or a theory, it literally happened.

She broke the law on three accounts in Benghazi. This is commonly known.

I am drunk and don't feel like digging for information at the moment. This is just shit that I grew up with, so I know it off hand. If you want to learn more about it then just research about whitewater. Hillary was corrupt long before Bill became president, as was Bill himself. You could also look into the things he was involved with in Arkansas. The entire Clinton family is corrupt as hell.

It's retards like you that make the right rise and become stronger :^)

:^)

Wow, that almost sounds like negligence… which is illegal, if you didn't know.

People have broken the rules and have been careless in the past, breaching protocol concerning classified material. They often lose their jobs, their security clearance, or are suspended… UNLESS THERE IS CRIMINAL INTENT.

Again, don't bother mentioning specifics. Anyway, I really couldn't give a fuck about Benghazi.

They're politicians who've done some shady shit, and they've also done some good things.

I was a Sanders supporter and I think Clinton is a cunt, but I would LITERALLY vote for Justin Bieber over Donald Trump. Literally.

I'm on the right m8, just saying.
:^)

I just popped in here without reading the thread :^)

Daddy give me your cummies I'm a naughty little fuck boy who just wants cock :^)

Heh… and so is the left. Both concern me for different reasons.

The is a difference between negligence and GROSS negligence.

You faggots are terrible at interpreting laws and nuance.

Exactly, you just ignore shit that goes against your narrative. I bet you don't even know about the details involved with Benghazi and just say it's "stoopid bcuz it's not what I believe". Fucking liberals…

No it isn't.

How could I possibly ignore it when it's shoved in my face all day long? There isn't a single piece of evidence that I've found to be compelling, regarding implicating Clinton as being GROSSLY negligent.

Maybe she screwed up… maybe not… I don't really care

Really? Then you haven't been paying attention to media sources outside of your alt-right hugboxes.

In way. It's not like all the super progressive bullshit is dying down.
Both sides are becoming more powerful, with one (the left) already in power

There is a difference but both are still fucking illegal, matey.

We're fucked boys.

Shoved in your face by watching CNN and other mainstream outlets…

That's because you don't bother to research things on your own.

I'm not even on the alt-right, I'm a libertarian and I read sources all over the board because I am not triggered by dissenting opinions, I want to hear the whole story.

You do not have a better understanding of the law than the Director of the FBI and the entire Department Of Justice, m80

You're just a typical pugnacious do-nothing who has debates on the internet all day… just like me

Yeah, but that's because you're retarded. Other people have found tons of evidence.
You'd care if Trump did it. You literally WOULDN'T shut up about it, I'd bet.

Understanding of the law doesn't matter when you're paid or blackmailed to disregard it anyway. But it is clearly written, for the record.

Do you know where we are right now? Do you honestly think that I've never browsed Holla Forums and been subjected to countless logical fallacies, and pseudo-evidence?

If you think Hillary isn't a criminal, then yes.

Yeah, on CNN.

Republicans who are desperately grasping at straws to ensure their victory don't really count. Neither does Holla Forums.

Pretty feeble, user

And that just proves your stance. You completely disregard people based on their political stance and don't actually try to prove if the statistics or data that they present are truthful. You engage in identity politics and choose to ignore certain people that you disagree with. You are a cuck, just like Holla Forumsacks.

Okay, okay. How about you go through your thought process of why Clinton isn't guilty. Explain it to me in detail, maybe I am wrong.

He can't, because all of his opinions are based on waking up in the morning and turning on his local news channel as he sips coffee and jack off to furry porn.

False. My point is that BOTH Republicans and Democrats have a tendency to politicize everything; therefore, I'm a bit more reluctant to blindly accept every speculative OPINION about certain subjects without incontrovertible evidence, given their dubious reputations for misrepresenting data for political gain (kinda like you've been doing throughout our entire discussion).

You're not too bright, are you?
NO. CRIMINAL. INTENT.

Stop samfagging, you're embarrassing yourself.

That's why you are a retard. Maybe you should make a tumblr account.

I'm not samefagging, I am making a post responding to something at the topic at hand, while upholding the same opinion. I'm not pretending to be some random person that joined the thread and decided to comment.

Maybe he can't, maybe he can. Hopefully he'll humor me, I just wanna see if he can provide evidence of her innocence.

Okay, no criminal intent (and bonus ad hominem!). Now the details, tell me exactly how there was no criminal intent. Humor me.

Ok, your brain cells have obviously become too fatigued to continue with a discussion that was pretty knuckle-dragging in the first place, so I'm gonna pack it in.

Take it as a win, m8. You're a very special boy.

You still don't seem to grasp the whole "burden of proof" thing.

Given the small chance that you're not the dumbass above, I'd like to tell you that you are also a very special boy, and that you have won the debate. Congratulations!

Okay, calling me names and "muh burden of proof" isn't proof, but if you're unable to continue and have to concede, that's fine.

k, you are always right, unless I disagree with you. I get it.

your logic reminds me of myself when I was 14. A dumb boy who thought I was always on topic and correct about everything. Anyone who disagreed with me was of course stupid and below me.

You can do anything you set your mind to, son. Don't you ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

And remember, you are not "disabled" but rather "differently abled"

see

See: again

see again

Did you also ignore any person's attempt at asking for an explanation for your opinions and call them big stupidheads and tell them that you needn't explain yourself because it's infallible by default because reasons (never explaining the reasons, of course) and they need to justify their opinion instead because reasons, just like him? :D

I'd like you to review one more time

Guys, guys! Maybe we ALL could learn from

AND

This is Holla Forums, after all. Let's just call it a day, yeah?

The guy literally said that he openly accepts any opinion that enters his mind.

And I quote:

"I'm a bit more reluctant to blindly accept every speculative OPINION about certain subjects without incontrovertible evidence"

That is basically saying "lol i'm neutral and accept every theory out there blindly because I am a cuck and fail to accept reality".

NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL "READING COMPREHENSION"!

Fuckin Bob's Burgers over here

Yeah it is, it's called reading shit and interpreting the words.

Yeah, if you're fuckin retarded.

Tell me how this guy didn't mean what I am talking about. Tell me you interpretation of his concept.

Wait, you don't have a interpretation. The opinion goes against yours, therefore it is retarded.

LOL. I just want you to know that I can't stop laughing at you, user.

...

user, you're just letting your preconceptions cloud your ability to honestly interpret opposing positions.

Don't feel bad, m8, we all do it sometimes.

Not that guy, but I'd say either extreme is dumb. Jumping to instantly accept anything as definitively true with only the smallest shred of evidence and never swaying your opinion even in the face of contradictory evidence is almost equally as retarded as accepting something without any proof at all. You usually need more than one or two pieces of evidence to be able to come to the conclusion that something is accurately true, and even then, sometimes you find new evidence that contradicts the old evidence, making what you thought was true before seem false. Facts change as our understanding of the evidence changes. Namsayin?

ITT: Butthurt leftists.

You have your own boards already. Go and never come back.

Nigger go home.

Yes, I nahyousayin, user; this is essentially what I was trying to express in the first place.

The problem is that people are often more concerned with proving points and winning debates than truly understanding the subjects.

You know, on that note, right-leaning folks have their own board, too. What is ANY political discussion doing on my Holla Forums? GTFO of here, this board is for, like, porn and memes and shit.

Lol forreal, nigga? Da fuck you doin herr?

No, user, you ARE the persons of color.