Millennial Woes on suicide watch

Millennial Woes on suicide watch


What is he refusing to tell us?
youtube.com/watch?v=aUcymHT0bUQ

Other urls found in this thread:

atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-righ
atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-right
youtube.com/watch?v=0UEsVrVbXKg).
atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-right/
archive.is/lYrri
archive.is/fCg1o
youtube.com/watch?v=q-nz5YaURTg
8ch.net/pol/res/5951410.html#5954494
atcwallace.com/2016/05/10/musings-10th-of-may/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

woes=BTFO

sucked too many dicks. or maybe he is just clinically depressed (mentally ill)?

What is this vague bullshit? Why not just flat out say things? I think Millennial Woes is too soft.

I feel sorry for him. Just imagine all the pressure on him, he's semi famous now. It must be getting to him.

He's a bit soft, but he's not a bad person, either. I think he wants to do the right thing.

He has fallen in love with a Pakistani guy.

Sadiq Khan?

Though that wouldn't explain why he wasn't able to specify.

HOW ABOUT NO

I agree, he's definitely useful and I enjoy listening to the hangouts in the background while I do other things. inb4 suicide


wew

...

...

alright hold it there fucker
I hate ecelebs too but the Millennial faggot blew the fuck out of the Mesopotamian lardass

How is he cancer?

He's getting all of Sargon's many followers to think critically about WNism.

whats with all this vague bait? better if he just said nothing

this

He probably caught GRIDS

what is Grids?

Gay-related immune deficiency, the original name for AIDS.

The "S" on the end just makes it sound better

I was surprised to hear that cuckman's argument actually boiled down to "white people fucked up other countries so they're not as advanced" and "white people stole everything from brown people"

he said somewhere he's celibate, so I don't think so

Really? I thought he had a girlfriend now.
I know he supposedly claims "I'm not gay, I'm bisexual now" and "I'm mostly heterosexual, 3/4 of the people I'm attracted to are women"

Maybe. I don't remember actually.

All the tossers say that, don't they?

he went through a phase.

This thread is pro-Woes. Woes is a great guy and we love him for his generosity

I still think he's too soft on the issue of gays. He claims it was a phase but as far as I know he's still mixed on feelings about homosexuality.

If he's changed, then fantastic, but if not the gay shit has to go

I don't care as long as he doesn't try to promote homosexuality. He is in favor of healthy White families. He's a good person.

Not perfect, but hating him is retarded.

I heard the esoteric trap philosopher, Adam Wallace, broke his heart.

One of woes biggest issues is that he's torn between the truth and his ideals. Any time you talk to him you can tell he wishes he was blue pilled on many things and it looks like it's finally getting to him.

He's been put into a position he can't handle in a world that he doesn't really like.

It's also possible he's being targeted now where he wasn't before and now he's getting paranoid because of it.

...

I don't care as long as he doesn't try to promote homosexuality. He is in favor of healthy White families. He's a good person.

Not perfect, but hating him is retarded. lol

Probably related to the GILF he has been dating.

Perhaps she really was a Black Widow as has been speculated and something something….

Just a depressed flake. He even put the word "woes" in his brand. The "bisexuality" should have tipped off anyone with brains he would never be reliable.

inb4 millennial woes sex tape comes out of him being dominated by an elderly woman

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

...

Anyone who identifies themselves by their self-pity is a faggot in my book.

he may have been threatened/gangstalked
just throwing it out there

forgot pic.

I agree

Who?

ALT
RIGHT
DATING
SITES

Fuck off, MillenialGoys.

What does Adam Wallace even do? Did anything happen between him and Woes?

Who?

I wonder if the Police have been in contact. We know now that the Scottish Police will arrest a man for teaching his dog how to do Nazi salutes as a joke.

atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-righ

That’s possible.

I am still going with his GILF / Black Widow GF attempting to push him of the side of a cruise ship.

>atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-right

lmfao

It's a depressing video, to be sure. I would guess that he is only doing it to garner interest in his upcoming videos, though.

...

Must have done a dna test and found out he is a Jew.

So, basically this guy's beef is:


Before anyone accuses me of strawmanning, I just want to say I have no idea who this guy is. I'm just trying to figure out what he's complaining about. Feel free to correct me if I was wrong.

i think hell be fine

Probably that he is a paid shill working now with Sinead McCarthy/Renegade/Firestarter Media et all.
This "something terrible has happened!" (Give me more shekels) is their default modus operandi.
Like Sinead claimed she would have to quit a few months back, due to a "stalker", then about a month back due to " legal action."
Woes is not going to be prosecuted because operatives work above the law. I know this is just going to generate a storm of cognitive dissonance, whatever. You have been warned.

And just to add, invade you already forgot, he has pulled this before by claiming Hope Not Hate got his dox. HNH made a Facebook post but didn't dox him. Result? Gave him excuse to collect donations. They never doxed him, so we are to believe a far-left org got a prime internet racist's dox and didn't publish? Please, you don't actually believe that shit wasn't staged… Do you?

...

I don't think that's true at all.

They never actually got his details.

They only knew his first name but they were looking for him in London,which is fucking hilarious.

...

yea, basically

NRx is good but they have a tendency to dislike the rest of the alt right for being too real and less theoretical

Woes love theory stuff. It's his cup of tea

Too bad their theories are all absolutely retarded. Autists should refrain from commenting upon anything within the human social realm, such as politics. They need to stick to programming and playing Minecraft.

Careful, m8. Adam Wallace might do a write-up on this thread if you trigger him too badly.

the theories are interesting and not all just autistic.

but they shouldn't attack the people who aren't soft intellectuals like they are

I thought NRX stopped being relevant after MPCdotters trolled their leaders to death.

...

Moderate lel that, lad.

He's also legit a trap, by the way - at least he was in 2014.

Are you a the same crazy bastard who tries to make every thread about sinhead? No one gives a shit lad.

christ i forgot he did that one video response to a Holla Forums thread
I couldn't watch it I was so embarrassed for him

what an autist

...

...

Link

...

...

And NRx are complete cancer anyway. We can only hope that they get so butthurt that they fuck off finally. Hitler talked about their type even back in his day. They are worthless to any real political movement, so it is best if they are cast away as dead weight.

why is everyone posting molly pictures

...

No, they aren't.

Except they are.

I feel a little bad whenever I hear him reference Holla Forums shit. Feels like we've corrupted him.

he's 35 and living with his father in the town he grew up in, and works part time at a convenience store

there's nothing to corrupt

If you don't want to talk about it don't bring it up.

Fucking attention-seeking faggots.

Holy hell, I heard about the 2002 pictures in the Holla Forums response video but is that really it? It's not shopped?

SCARY, IS IT REAL?

They all do this. Sinead McCarthy claims not to post here, yet threads all over Holla Forums carry her Like taint. Furthermore when something damning is posted here about her, a video countering the point is released within days.
Woes did a huge video explaining away various criticisms posted about him here, "someone emailed me the thread", yeah. Course they did.

The reason they all deny posting on Holla Forums is so that shilling their own content can be denied. = gives the illusion of v a greater and more zealous support base than actually exists, sort of like astroturfing.

woes is a weird lad who is emblematic of the "alt-right"

I'd pet his head tho

D-Did he live in a cupboard?

Look at how compact that setup is!

Also someone pls CSI that notebook, it could give us valuable insights into his past.

Most of the quotes he responds to were by one guy who had saved deleted videos of him admitting to being a fsg. He was so angry and distraught that this evidence was out there, so a few months back he deleted it all (just like Sinead McCarthy, just like Angelo Gage, just like so many others)

...

Woes just confirmed in the comments section of the OP vid that Adam's concerns

are what's bothering him and making him question if he wants to be part of the alt-right.

Turns out it wasn't MI5, the religion of peace, or lefties that put Woes on suicide watch… it was Holla Forums.

You do realise he's not actually 5'2? That was a joke, he's about average height.

WIDF pls go

HOTWHEEEEELS

...

What was Angelo Gage's video? He's a fag too?

Right on cue.
Every time, the same attempted astroturfing shill response, pretending to speak for everyone on Holla Forums "n…no one cares, just ignore this, they're a Jew, no they're paranoid, n…no they're a faggot!"

Renegade radio will continue to be exposed. If you didn't care then you wouldn't have (1) the thread.

...

...

Well for a start he did his DNA results and it showed Ashkenazi Jewish. There were plenty of other "wtf?" Videos though. So he deleted them all after raging about "larpers".

You do realise that Sinead and her faggot husband hate Woes?

The shit talked him and were generally obnoxious when he had them on one of his hangouts.

He is just a mentally ill person with identity issues.

I can’t believe I have lived to witness a 5’2 NEET be white knighted.

MAX WEW

Judging by that photo, he might be Jewish.
Has he ever sported a beard? If not, ask yourself why such a slovenly man still goes to the bother of shaving.

he's a 1/4 Italian Scottish guy.

Adam putting those burner accounts to good use.

This whole thing is stupid.

Gossip, drama, FEEEELUNS etc

The “Alt Right” is a joke.

We are being genocided, time to man up!

He has a beard right now
he's part taig part italian
don't imply my husbando is jewish, you fucker

I love how "the 14/88ers" cause so much butthurt.

Jew? Non-white child? Proof?

Fuck off Sinead

feels GREAT man

Literally WAT

A-Adam, that you lad? You have forgotten to put your trip on.

FUCK OFF SINEAD

great thread.

Check that YouTube channel's like history and subs. It's all Firestarter shit. Red Ice Radio, Angelo Gage, Pail Joseph Watson Evalion, wife with a purpose, Joe Owens, .
That is a Firestarter media sock puppet account. Notice the stereotypical terms "1488ish". " alt-right", it is probably Sinead herself, she shills for Woes frequently.

Sam Hyde is literally the only right-wing eceleb I like.

I tried following that commonfilth guy but he's too much of an anti-white christian retard that I couldn't be bothered. MW is just brit/pol/ tier autism, and sargon revealed himself as a cuckold. Milo is also too much of a humongous faggot.

…. You folks actually watch this drivel?

Going over the top with it has the added effect of driving away cucks. You can really tell who is legitimately right wing and who is just a bourgeois/conservative/reactionary waste of time.

hyde and common filth are the only decent "e-celebs"
that vladmir jaffe guy who's essentially an irl shitposter is good entertainment too.

Sam Hyde thread?

This is like parody. Do you really think idiots screaming 1488 all the time and trying to advocate genocide makes you more right-wing than someone advocating for a restoration of society to pre-enlightenment values ?

this

...

She posted a photo of her son on Twitter, he is mulatto. No it isn't still up, you will have to find it yourself, google image for her name and "eon" might turn it up, I'm on mobile device so don't have it here myself.
As for the Jew thing, her appearance and behaviour doesn't make it obvious to you? Needless to say she doesn't admit it. They are mostly Jews. Gage, Kyle Hunt, Evalion is non-white, admitted, I'm seriously wondering now whether Woes is a Jew, regardless he is working for the state, if not he would already have been arrested in Scotland, trust me. Apart from that the connections to Renegade are damning enough. Renegade is part of a large network of mutually supporting shills/subversives/operatives, the same names come up again and again. The same videos liked, the same channels promoted.

All common filth does is read tumblr shit that faggots write. Now he spends his time on twitter bashing white nationalists because he's a bible thumper.

proof of you're a pile of bullshit on top of bullshit

or* you're a…

truly the hero we deserve

Fuck off Sinead.

you will never return to your society of "pre-enlightenment values" without cleaning up the non-white populations infesting our nations. There really is no "pleasent" way about it.

fuck off Israelite

As if the fact she never shows her son off, unlike every other proud WN woman.
There are fucking photographs because she stupidly posted a pic ONCE. Use a search engine and find it yourself.

See, the red-pilled/pro-white crowd is very eager for a voice, someone who'll express our concerns publicly, since we're about as maligned in society as fucking child molesters. Unfortumately that means we attract a lot of attention-seeking sociopathic morons, or in the case of Woes, plain 'ol mentally ill weirdos.

Fuck personality cults, fuck worship of imdividuals at the expense of creating real communities/tribes, with actual cohesion. Trump is kind of an exception to this since he's actually doing something useful, and genuinely pushing the Overton Window rightwards, rather than just bleating about the state of the world and stirring up pointless drama.

I don't fuck with social media so I didn't know, his podcasts are decent background noise and I generally get a kick out of staring into the tumblrfaggot abyss, he fills a void IA left when he stopped those tumblr-ism vids and started acting like a faggot for the 20th time.
sad he shits on nationalism though, that being said I don't think racial awareness and believing in God are incompatible. real shame tbh.

I'm not messing with file transfers on my phone but since you're obviously connected to Sinead/Renegade I will just leave this here to really piss you off.

His criticism of WN has nothing to do with being anti-racist and everything to do with the fact they worship their own race as a God and can't call out the inherent problems with their people. I can understand why that would upset WN though because it means you weren't just born into being superior but that there is something higher you must aspire to beyond your genetics.

I don't think I've ever heard cf talk about jews, does he?

I think I know where woes is coming from. I've spent a lot of time on Holla Forums joining the banter and advocating for a trump presidency on abstract intellectual grounds. A movement of small enthusiasts is a lot of fun but when it starts to grow its easy to become disillusioned. I recently went to a trump rally and had to leave twenty minutes in. I agreed with what trump was saying but the actions of the rabble around me made me sick. The average trump supporter nowadays is just a spiteful ignorant mouthbreather who would put a degenerate shutin like me first in line for a bullet to the back of the head when the rwds come to town. Im willing to bet that woes is seeing the alt right fill up with dipshit 1488ers and is a disillusioned as I am with his movement.

Oh well, we'll always have sam.

I dunno he seems to be like the Christards on Holla Forums who think Europeans were retarded savages until Christianity somehow ascended us to civilisation. Ignoring the fucking Roman Empire, Ancient Greece and even the Vikings who were the first Europeans to reach America and also traded as far as Iran.

Yes, because we do more than "advocate."

Reactionaries are LARPers. Their entire political activity is confined to discussions of ideology (communists believe 'x' and monarchists believe 'y,' we need to go back to 'z' philosophy *sperg sperg sperg*).

They do not truly engage in politics because politics is inherently practical and active, not confined to the ideological sphere. Reactionaries are useless because they have zero practical application of their theories, and in truth their ideas are impossible to institute in reality anyway. At most they can whine and kvetch because people engaging in practical politics don't adhere to their unrealistic bullshit, which they do constantly z much to the annoyance of those engaging in politics.

so, he's just against racial gnostics? makes sense.

fairly sure he's brought up jewish subversion in his podcasts, can't think of anything specific though.

I think those people just take an extreme view, calling you savages because you hadn't yet begun adhering to christian morals.
they either are willfully ignorant of or don't understand their own history.

The problem is that most reactionaries I've seen spend more time complaining about "idiots screaming 1488" than they do restoring society to pre-enlightenment values.

I'm cool with traditionalism and natsoc, but I see traditionalism or "reactionary" ideas as being more long term goals. Right now, they have to take a back seat to more aggressive policies.

Also, are you Adam Wallace?

The weak should fear the strong.

Holy shit. I didn't follow CF too closely, but I always thought he was cool.

I'm so sorry, Holla Forums. You were right about e-celebs. They are all disappointments, bar none. You were always right, Holla Forums.

i don't see a problem with this. but i do see a problem with your kike worship.

The funny thing is that they don't even practice these pre-enlightenment values themselves. 99% percent of reactionaries are effeminate faggots who would rightly be looked down upon by most people in pre-enlightenment societies. Their idea of aristocracy is a bunch of twinks sitting around a salon discussing literature, when really this is a modern deviation of true aristocracy, who were virile and violent.

...

but millennial woes seriously won that debate and I barely watch sargon anymore because of it. Especially after that god awful last debate he did

I don't really watch tv, or follow people. I only listen to ideas.

But with "e-celebs" it is a catch 22, if you are humble your videos and thus the ideas are never spread, but if you try to promote and share them you are shilling and get called out.

so… would anyone like to know my youtube channel? I am not paid by the jews, because I am not paid because I am an unemployed fuck.

As opposed to whose political activities exactly? There's a few small groups like those Soldiers of Odin and individuals like Varg, but not much else. Of course other than the kikes trying to pull people into nonsense like the "alt-right," reactionary ideology is 1488. Racialism and fascist nationalism are the ideals we are trying to restore because those are the things which have always made European civilization great. There simply isn't much anyone can do at the moment because the next step in political activism is "gather all whites together and purge the foreigners (and race traitors)." Until then all anyone can do is forge himself into a vessel for carrying out the day of the rope and shitpost about the truth so that more minds can be freed from the Zionist-globalist indoctrination.

The real problem is here
There isn't an actual aristocracy around anymore. Everyone looks down on e-celebs because they are attention-seeking posers rather than leaders of men. How many people even aspire to noblesse oblige these days?

There won't be any sort of restoration (take your pick on calling it 1488, conservative, reactionary, fascist, traditionalist or whatever) without the top of the hierarchy. After all, what perhaps defines European idealism best is the acceptance of the natural order and its implications for societal organization. More simply, we are the ones who respect authority and accept responsibility, but there are no lords planting banners and calling men to fulfill their duties. Not in large enough numbers to create a coherent ethno-nation at least.

You were never welcome here.

do you think Holla Forums's Holla Forums is entirely for nat soc discussion?

Aristocracy is defined by ability in warfare above all else. The degeneration comes in with hereditary titles. The warrior father makes a mistake in mate selection and produces a cowardly twink son.

No, I'm Nationalist Libertarian.
Holla Forums is for 2 things
1. Intellectual spartanism- debating with the result of either bettering your debate skills or proving that the point you are trying to prove is superior.
2. Organizing anonymously to fuck up the plans of jews/the establishment/ the left/ etc.

Merely labeling someone as "1488"er is just calling someone a racist. You fucking prove your point that they are wrong, or you are not welcome here.

libertarian realist?

but that is skintard tier bullshit. Promote the white race without lowering yourself to trailer trash.

Well, there's also those of us that aren't National Socialists. I'm a monarchist, but I think monarchy is just a more basic implementation of the same nationalistic principles which exist in NS. I'd join a NS party in a heartbeat if such a thing existed in my country and I'd swear my allegiance to a resurrected Hitler as king of Aryans with utter glee. So 1488? Yes please. If you aren't on board with 1488, you're a race traitor.

Why did anyone even like him in the first place? I saw one video and he was pretty much just whining like a cuck about feminism being kinda bad. Always seemed like a soft semi-liberal.

no, Holla Forums is for posting cheeky merchants and waiting for an autist from stormfront to roll in and make a really good post that we all screengrab and claim for our own

like not even 1%
and people got ape shit

I think you are mistaken. Tradfags engage in constant virtue signalling against fascism, national socialism, racism, and so on. Visit some of their blogs and you will see.

There are more than that. In Europe, strains of fascism are pretty pervasive. From political parties to charity and sociak service groups to football hooligans (which the tradfags would look down upon of course). They don't have a lot of power, but they have a good culture and a good base from which to build.

well yes I am a realist, but to be spesific I am a
American Nationalist Libertarian.

You are doing exactly what the left does. Labeling does not make inherent falseness.
Why are people living in a trailer, trash?
Why are the 14 words and 88 precepts retarded neo-nazi exclusive principles?

The entire conversation chain is about NRx which is largely a cabal of nebbish Jews constructing reasons why nebbish Jew technocrats should rule over Warrior-Aristocrats who are all "swine". You can read their progenitor Moldbug yourself who is a Califronian, red diaper baby mischlinge computer programmer. He's just a Libertarian who openly doesn't like niggers and has erected a moral justification for a world run by Jewish oligarchs entitled to vast hoards of gentile slaves without any associated ability to secure their property militarily. Moldbug envisions a future where cryptography is so advanced that all modern weaponry can be controlled by a single Jew, hence giving them direct control over all of the world's warriors obsoleting warriors virtues entirely enslaving them to a technocratic Merchant ethos whose holders will literally be able to wave a magic wand that makes them immune to gunfire, and the consequent need to fear for their lives. As we all know supreme comfort in your body, property and complete disdain for even the need for bravery are all great qualities to have in a ruler.

Shitposting about the truth is a political activity and hence it is not an activity that "Neoreactionaries" engage in.

NRX isn't reactionary ideology, that's just kikes leading people to the "alt-right" trap from another avenue. As if the virtue signalling you mention isn't enough proof, the very fact that they engaged in the Semitic pass time of semantic twisting by inventing a new term for their ideology is a pretty big give-away considering the entire point of the reactionary ideology itself is adhering to tradition. Can't really be adhering to tradition if you are making up a new name for your movement to differentiate it from those traditions. I never want to visit those miserable fucks again.

So with things like those European fascist parties, what qualifies as more than being confined to discussions of ideology? Are political rallies enough, because I don't particularly see those as very helpful. I think pretty much everything is on the level of "discussion" until you get a unifying commander going door to door arming whites and taking oaths of loyalty. That's the only action that will really make a difference.

-closed borders, near isolationist trade, noninterventionist

-no borders, handing out a countries wealth to other countries, interventionist

Pick one faggot. Wait, you're filtered.

Remember fam: nationalist and libertarian are exclusive ideologies of each other.

The "nationalist libertarian" maymay is being force for the past 6ish weeks. Since like super Tuesday 2.

Woes is controlled op and a straight up kike. I got proof showing he supports Black Pigeon. Which we all know about Pigeon. Thank the Gods for Renegade Broadcasting. The only real media source in this our movement.

Surely you could put National Socialist through the same sophist bullshit you just pulled and try to claim THAT is also a contradictory philosophy.

If you have proof that he supports Black Pigeon, then why did you not post it? The image you did post demonstrates only that MW's audience watches BP videos.

Correct, but that is only the economic(and only part of the economic) aspect of nationalism.
you are confusing libertarianism with anarchism, cuckservatism, and left-libertarianism.

Also, I have been and been talking about Nationalist Libertarianism, since the beginning of last year. It is no fault of mine that when I explain it to people they agree and then identify as such.

You could try to do that. You could also try to disprove his arguments instead of calling it sophistry. You did neither however.

You could, however you'd fail.

Just because it has socialist in it's name does not make it literally socialist - for everyone. See the first word - national? Yeah, that qualifies the second word - socialist.

You can not separate them and take the individual words alone and use it to represent the whole. You know what that's called? Fallacy of composition.

Here's the thing. On one hand, we can't be too purist and attack people who don't match up exactly with us for two reasons:

1. We're better off putting pressure on cuckservatives as a way to reach out to normies and shift the overton window to the Right.

2. What makes someone a cuck is:

But on the other hand, we have e-celeb faggots like Ramzpaul who are punching to the right, calling some of us "1488ers" and "LARPers".

This. He doesn't even do anything funny. He just reads off this shit in a grumpy voice and then complains about it.

You might as well just go over to your grandpa's house and turn on the TV.

This is BP's channel

So why does that argument not also apply to Nationalist Libertarianism?

You said "I got proof showing he supports Black Pigeon." You have not posted anything resembling that even in the slightest.

This is a good point. Don't punish the slightly cuckservatives for the likes of Kristol etc.

Show them that Kristol, et al. like individuals will not be tolerated to give them a reason to not follow down the cuckservative path.

Like you don't teach your child not to play with knives because they're dangerous by stabbing them. You cut your hand very slightly to show them that it causes a "booboo".

k

what the fuck?

He acts so self-righteous about it too. Thats what puts me off of him. He sees shit that we have all seen a million times before, yet he acts like this makes him a tough motherfucker who is making society take it's medicine. He isnt.

Well BP has taken a liking to him.

Im sorry, what the fuck was that? I think Sinead is dogshit too, but that video and channel is nutty as fuck.

k

...

You said "I got proof showing he supports Black Pigeon."

Will you post it, or will you admit categorically that the sentence you posted was false?

Yeah. On one of the few episodes that I could stomach, he's also said that whenever somebody wants to discuss something in depth, they're trying to poison your mind.

I don't understand how anybody could actually go through life like that. Is this an IQ thing, or something?

The pic's I posted. Fuck off woes your not welcome here.

I think Woes is a watered-down faggot. You said "I got proof showing he supports Black Pigeon," and that statement so far appears to have been a lie.

I was actually one of his original followers and I was part of making him popular on Holla Forums. Frankly I regret it.

He has turned into such a fucking prick. He just complains about furries and tumblr and fags like thats anything new. He doesnt even give a legitimate solution, although sometimes he just goes full NWO tier like what you just said. Like "hurr people dont deserve to be literate because it just leads to degeneracy" or some shit like that. And im not anti-Christian at all, and I dont want to sound like a liberal faggot when I say this, but yes, he does sound like a "bible-thumper" more and more.

Newsflash buddy, anyone who has been on the internet for more than a few years has seen pretty much the same shit you have.

ur bein rused, m8

Damn, fam. He really does have issues.

idiot

I agree, you are totally right. Any sign of nuance, or talking to someone of differing political views is the clear mark of a kike shill. We are clearly much better off being represented by low-IQ shrill LARPy literal flat earthers.

You fucking mongoloid, people like you will kill this "movement" before it even fully gets off the ground. Do we want something actually normie-viable or stormfront 2.0? It is people like you Adam was talking about, lmao.

Looks like a stepping stone on the way to where we are, what is the issue?

So he changed the channels he liked to "Awesome Friends" who are people he's subscribed to and that somehow means Millennial Woes supports BPS? BPS also has linked to people (MW's included) at the end of his videos, even those who have talked shit about him but that he found were good channels. Guy seems like he's trying to spread his success and you shit on him and MW's for guilt by association with someone (BPS) that you don't care for (likely paranoid about)?

Fuck people like you. That logic annoys the shit out of me.


Gas yourself. That shitstorm of a site has literally caused more D&C in the past 6 months than we should have had at a time when we had the most opportunity to push a message during Trump's rise.

Renegade is cancer. They are the flat earth people in case you didnt realize.

They are insane motherfuckers over there. They have really been shilling on Holla Forums for the past month or so.

Because "Socialism" isn't a specific ideology in National Socialism, so other user is wrong in that "National" is even a qualifier. Socialism in National Socialism is just the acceptance that the proper organization of society is not along market-driven lines and that the various pillars of Liberalism like individualism and equality are invalid. It's basically just accepting that the Family Unit exists as an entity which is not determined and should not be subject to "market forces" and that this organizing principle can be expanded out to a larger, extended family that is race.

Libertarianism is just a critique of Liberalism that incorporates the arguments of Anarchists in a piecemeal fashion updating Liberal arguments against aristocratic principles, the family et cetera, to also applying to the State. Libertarianism is a more specific sense of Liberalism, which was itself already a global, anti-nationalist ideology by the early 19th century. The Socialism of National Socialism is a less specific meaning of Socialism.

Socialists would say that National Socialism is not Socialism in the modern sense and they would be right. Libertarians would say that your National Libertarianism is not Libertarianism and they would be right. The problem is that National Socialism was actually called National Socialism in history, and references a vaguer brand of "socialism" that no longer exists, and even its' contribution to the Party were diminished as it became ascendant. If you were to name the Party today you'd never call it National Socialism because it is essentially not Socialism at all in the modern sense and would be an oxymoron.

Since there is no such thing as National Libertarianism and such a term is an oxymoron in the present and you are not bound to this label by any historicity it's patently retarded to use. Libertarianism has never been a vague concept and has always been Ultra-Liberalism unlike Socialism which wasn't always a byword for Red Leftism.

Since I'm on a tear I'll just point out that Libertarianism is actually a phase described by Karl Marx on the path to Communism before Socialism. Since Liberalism failed to mutate into this fully materialist, quasi-anarchic selfishness which would destroy social structures organically as predicted (in reality this was happening, just not fast enough) you have Jews who invent a new ideology which is basically what Karl Marx determined should exist as a natural consequence of Liberal hegemony, which would make this human product more susceptible to Socialist reform. This new ideology replaced Classical Liberalism with this Anarchist-inspired more extreme form and now been associated with "patriotism" and was propped up late in the Cold War in propaganda directed at children as the source of America's strength (a direct swipe at our race, religion, culture and history). Of course we did then get Marx's predicted result that a purely deracinated, Capitalist ilk who have no beliefs except feeding their hedonism are susceptible to Socialist subversion.

He's a gay

Gays are sjw degenerates abd always want attention 24/7

What do we know about him? I'm suspicious he came out of nowhere with his professionally made videos but that's it.


Yeah. Richard Spencer may be a literal faggot with his head in the clouds about wanting countries to stay in the EU and have it become the European Imperium. But he's not a total cuck and by wasting energy attacking him we don't really accomplish anything.

Contrast that with the cuckservative meme and how much we've shaken things up with our campaign for Donald Trump.

However, people like ramzpaul need to be called out because they punch to the Right. Jared Taylor by contrast doesn't name the jew but he doesn't attack us and has explained his position on them (youtube.com/watch?v=0UEsVrVbXKg). It's not perfect since he goes out of his way to court token pro-white jews, but he's much more reasonable about it, doesn't attack us like a dismissive prick and acknowledges the issues with Jews.

Those are left-libertarians. That's like comparing Jeb Bush to Pat Buchanan.

Murray Rothbard, Hans-Hermann Hoppe etc. aren't those.

Christopher Cantwell (some youtubefag) is an anarcho-capitalist yet he acknowledges we need border control and has talked about the need of preventing the extinction of the white race.

Faggot.

Thank you for the very concise answer.
But like the socialism of national socialism has very little to do with "pure" socialism, such is the same with libertarianism in Nationalist Libertarianism.

It has nothing to do with Marx, or any sense of the word regarding Europe.

But I reject the concept that "there is no such thing as Nationalist Libertarianism." I am an objectiveist and ideas have an objective existence independent of human recognition or physical examples. As long as the idea is sound, it exists.

So then your argument is left with, "Both names are bad, but we have a historical reason for us having a bad name." We are the makers of history, and if a new ideology is coined, we are the prime responsibility holders to make it have a good reason to carry on the name.

On my youtube channel I even am starting a video series on Nationalist Libertarianism, and right now because of final exams I am sitting on the audio and need to edit it into a video.

I love the fact that Common Filth triggers fedoras and tree worshippers so much

To follow up, there are two short rules of thumb when looking at Nationalist Libertarian policy.

Don't equate libertarianism with anarchism, use the American use of the word.

When applied to international policy or policy that effects the whole nation, apply nationalist policy.
When Applied to domestic policy or policy affecting individual citizens or the structureing of the government in relation to citizens, apply libertarian policy.

Does he really? Or do you fool yourself into thinking that because you just like to hear what he as to say even though its nothing new and its all stuff you could have found on Holla Forums years and years ago?

Naw, Holla Forums from years ago would have made it funny.

Well I meant the general state of disgust. But you are right, CF has zero fucking humor in his talks or podcasts or whatever he calls them. His tumblristas is, or rather was funny because at this point its beating a dead horse that has been dead so long its a fucking skeleton.

There was no argument. He just pulled the two words apart and acted like it was an astounding tear down of that guy's moniker. It was facile.


You have to be taking the piss. I must be going nuts to even reply to this.


I am not a libertarian, nor am I a "national libertarian". In fact, I like reading critiques of libertarianism, but what you wrote really makes no sense.

Libertarianism is actually very nebulous, you yourself gave multiple examples of its various forms, each with differing principles and reasoning – this why there's left and right libertarianism (not like they're so entirely different, I understand). Really, the analysis of libertarianism you wrote doesn't even matter in context of what we're really discussing. You admitted national libertarianism is not considered libertarianism, what's the point of aimlessly shitting on it for being a Kike/Marxist creation when Socialism is the same thing? Why even write that when the same logic can be applied to National Socialism, which I do admire?

Is it a retarded label? Does it lack historical context? Yep! But that doesn't change thethat the system under that label is relatively cogent and deserves analysis further than splitting the two words apart and being obnoxious.

>>>/twitter/

MGTOW anti-natalist megacuck confirmed

Hopefully that faggot junkie got raped by some coons with HIV and is now going to die.

idiot>>5946957
lmfao what wow idiot

He's basically the same as Ramzpaul but its' ancient history to newfags. Ramzpaul is what he is because he's been courted by Jared Taylor. Taylor's primary mode of "white" activism is shilling for Jews to whites.

You can read something unobjectionable that AmRen puts out in the same way you can watch some basic bitch TV show. It doesn't require any fellow feeling. The proper stance for Jared Taylor's contributions is ingratitude.

Those are the endpoints of Economic Liberalism. If you are anti-Capitalist you aren't a Libertarian.

Rothbard in point of fact was basically just an Anarchist who believed in thriving child slave markets. He's of basically the same position of Paul Ryan who is currently saying that a billion Muslims need to come to America and if you don't like it you better be fabulously wealthy so as to be able to shield yourself from the effects of this invasion. He believed in Nationalism in so much as it would be exposed to market forces and as such had to be voluntarily purchased. Which is his sophists way of saying that borders are illegitimate, as they would eventually be decanted by market forces as they would benefit defectors over cooperators to any commonweal (since that is the design and cornerstone of modern economics).

Hoppe isn't any kind of Libertarian and is just an aspergerian who spergs out over irrelevant minutia like "the State" while constructing what amounts to a fascist State but due to some spergy reason it would be moral. The authoritarianism that dare not speak it's name.
Hoppe's own policies would require that 99.9% of Libertarians be excluded from his Libertarian society. Of course 99.9% of Libertarians agree that what Hoppe is constructing is actually a State and so would oppose it and according to Hoppe by opposing it would necessarily have to be removed from "It" which is totally not a State. Because it's all about "States" and the premises of Red Emma Goldman and other Leftist Jews regarding "the State" and other aspects of goysiche society are at all worthwhile.


Except it's not as I already stated that Socialism had multiple meanings in the past, while Libertarian does not today and never has had a vaguer meaning. It's vaguer label would just be Liberalism.

So the person you originally rebutted is correct in that the term is an oxymoron while National Socialism is not in it's historic context. It's only an oxymoron for miseducated dolts, who are precisely the same people who would think that National Libertarianism is not an oxymoron.

Objectivism is the inane ramblings of a Leftist Jew whose ideology amounts to raging against foundations of gentile society which she blamed for Communism rather than the actual culpable party.

There is no second-order justification for Objectivism, and it rejects the only secular second-order justifications for morality that has ever successfully be explicated. Basically anyone who is an Objectivist is just invested in their feels and can't accept either a metaphysical worldview or the harsh reality of a Natural Law and so prefer this Jewish axiomatic philosophy which allows them to dodge religious belonging or opening themselves up to a self-appraisal that would expose them as untermensch.

It's also a complete non-sequitur so I don't know why you brought it up except to expose yourself as being even more disdainful for being the devotee of a mentally ill, goybashing Jew.

Did I hurt the fanboys feelings? You can die of AIDS as well you stupid bitch.

You think this loser has some great annoucement? hahahahahhaha. He admittedly has done nothing with his life and has no future. He has no business whatsoever commenting on ANYTHING. A fucking clerk hahahaha

I'm him thank you and I'm not bad at all. You're jealous as fuck of me.

Dude, I am not talking about ayn rand's objectivism.

I am talking about the objectivism in philosophy, such as Kant.
That is exactly what objectivism states, that the metaphysical and physical exist independent of human experience.
I brought it up because to an objectivist, saying an idea doesn't exist(as long as it is sound/coherant) is just plain false.

If it makes you feel better, just call it, Nationalist not-socialism. We are going to keep using the term Nationalist Libertarianism, and define it how we like, and we can both give each other a fine how do you do and go our separate ways.

God this is some gay ass fucking shit. E-celebs need to fucking die.

Pick one and only one, faggot.

And Hoppe's vision for a private property society is realistic, but difficult to implement, anti-social behavior and degeneracy would not be removed by force but simply would not be incentivized or contribute in anyway to survival or success, unlike our current welfare state that actually incentivizes anti-social behavior over moral behavior, when getting your shit together and being moral is the sole way to earn a living or have any place in society, natural selection solves the rest. Your comparison of a private property ancap society to "the State" is asinine at best, advocating for legal discrimination and ostracization against the dregs of society is not the same as initiating force against them.


False. That is misinformation from a single quote taken completely out of context from one of his books which was a hypothetical tangent from the main thesis, which does not advocate child slavery or slavery in general as it violates NAP.


When all land is privately owned, immigration is entirely by consent and like trade will only occur if mutually beneficial, migration of peoples in and of itself is not a problem, forced integration as part of a perverse leftist social experiment absolutely is, without a welfare state immigration is severely diminished, literally all of the rapefugees in Europe are going after handouts. Without a welfare state, immigration ceases to be a way for r-selected scum to invade and replace K-selected white communities on their dime, which is the real problem of immigration to begin with. The only way to maintain peace among culturally, racially, and linguistically distinct people is the complete voluntarization of human association and migration, which is not at all incompatible with in-group preference for whites and strong white communities, if anything it supports it.

I wish people would use a better descriptive term than "1488ers". I know what they are refering to and I mostly agree with their criticism of that type of people, but not everyone does understand, so it's important to use accurate language.

Yes, which is a valid argument which has not been rebutted. It is also not the whole of my argument as we stand with Libertarianism being something meant to be rather specific and wholly derivative of Liberalism regardless of what brand of Libertarianism you are talking about. Nationalism is an anti-Liberal premise, so you are left with an oxymoron in present and historically.

What you are saying on one hand is that Libertarianism will take on a new meaning in the future if you shill hard enough (it won't) so what Libertarianism actually, definitionally is doesn't matter. Then on the other you hypocritically say
Which is just Libertarianism. It's also nonsensical as you do not get a "Libertarian government" without Libertarian citizens and a Libertarian (or Objectivist) ethos in which there is no basis for caring about Nationalism. Libertarians do not support open borders, globalism, et al because they are humanitarians who cry for brown people. The justification for these policies is that they benefit the domestic population. So applying Libertarian policies at the domestic level is actually advocating for international labor liquidity.

I think you could make economic arguments as to how labor liquidity at a global level is a 'bad' thing, unfortunately those arguments cannot be made in the field of Economics because they would rely on factors that are not a part of the academic discipline. They would also miss the point because if your only recourse for adjudicating qualitative outcomes or morality is Utilitarianism you've already accepted a Leftist premise as the arbiter of your decision-making. These arguments shouldn't need to be made on these grounds and requiring that they be made is accepting a subordinate position as moral inferiors to Leftists.

It makes perfect sense. You just don't have any of the requisite knowledge to make use of what I write. You are historically illiterate on the subject.

It's not very nebulous at all. They all have the same principles and all derive from the same source and arrive at very close positions based on slightly different reasoning. These differences seem like huge gulfs to insiders, but are actually irrelevant minutia which is debated only after accepting the same axioms which are not up for debate at all among Libertarians of any stripe. I similarly don't give a damn about the distinction between the various strains of Communism. Pretending that they have differences that are of any actual importance is silly.

There is no Right Libertarianism. It's an entirely, exclusively left-wing ideology. You could say that Stalinism is "Right Communism" only when juxtaposed to Trotskyites, but it would be fallacious. Libertarianism can have elements of 'right-wing thought' but that's only because those elements are actually perennial aspects of the human experience and should be absolved from being subject to right/left distinctions. They are only subject to such categorization because certain dispensations of either the Left or Right both have utopian views which eschew these perennial aspects relegating reality to one worldview or another. That some Libertarians occasionally (and rarely) alight on reality doesn't make them right-wing.

The axioms of Libertarianism, rooted in Liberalism and Anarchy are radically far-left. You can't axiomatically reject the basis of right-wing societies and then arrive at some Rightist dispensation. Except if you get slapped by reality and conform, which means abandoning Libertarianism. Of course we are perennially tribalists and Libertarians despite their desires for humanity to be something more utopian are themselves tribalists so some idiot brainwashed by a left-wing cult will conform to reality, abandon central pillars or Libertarianism but still call themselves Libertarians and fight tooth and claw for all of the other premises of Libertarianism which are just as false because doing otherwise would mean they are no longer a part of their moral tribe.

I didn't. I've talked to this poster before. He's a Libertarian. His Libertarianism is not subordinated to Nationalism, but the opposite. He's just trying to justify his Leftism because Liberals believe in Liberalism much more strongly than ISIS believes in Allah.

Reality has forced him into this oxymoronic position and rather than reevaluate this pervasive Western mind virus objectively he's fighting for it's perpetuation into the future.

Except I already said it is not. If you accept that the Family Unit is a valid organ of society then you accept Socialism. It's an incredibly vague concept which has taken on specific meaning, largely due to propaganda from Liberals who wish to construct the political world into fighting over different strains of Liberalism. Socialism used to be a rejection of Liberalism. Now it is much more specifically a critique of Liberalism either comprehensively like Marxist Socialism or Patchwork like Progressivism. A vague term has become more specific over time, making a historical label seem odd to modern people.

So it would be inaccurate to say this about Socialism, except in a colloquial sense. Libertarianism on the other hand it would be accurate to say this in either a colloquial or academic sense because it's historic and contemporary meaning is basically the same.

Because it can't. It would then not be logic as you would necessarily have to ignore all of the distinctions that I've laid out. It would then be duplicity because you would be lying about what these labels mean.

It's not at all cogent. It is the same phenomena as the God of the Gaps. As reality increasingly intrudes upon Liberalism further justifications for Liberalism are trotted out in increasingly narrow arenas. You clawing and clutching at your precious Leftist worldview and fear over the inevitable reckoning that will come as the fallout of this worldview isn't "cogent" in the slightest.

Are Black Pigeon and Gex the same?

A reactionary rejects national socialism, it's a leftist ideology.
Pic related.
Also, Nrx are not reactionaries, they're disillusioned libertarians and ancaps.

is he finally transitioning? why are traps like ttpw and AW overrepresented in the 'alt-right'

What
I didn't even know traps were represented at all in the altright.

Some large proportion of the "females" in the altright are actually men.

Do you even #tradwife bro?

Yes, it is trivial minutia. Someone is going to have this monopoly on "power" so it is irrelevant on rather or not you subjectively deem them legitimate or not based on them being called "the State". It's spergy nonsense. There are countless historical examples of weak, collapsing States where other individuals and groups take over the role of the State in de facto anarchy. Ultimately it doesn't matter if the person calling the shots doesn't have a desk plaque that says "President" on it or not and obsessing over this is a subject-object problem is fundamentally an example of being stuck in a philosophical rut. "The State" is simply that group that has power. You can pretend that "power" won't exist, which is ultimately what you are getting at in your great quest to remove humanity from the human experience and everyone will be happy, and free and equal in world peace but it's all fucking fairy tale bullshit. Live in fucking reality. If you don't want to be oppressed then perhaps actually take the responsibility to accumulate the power necessary to prevent it instead of advocating that we psycholocally neuter humanity into being incapable of expressing their will. "Rights" don't exist and they never will.

Hoppe advocates removal by force, so you are wrong. Regardless Libertarians are anti-social degenerates by definition, which is exampled in your post.

Absolutely true, and his thriving child slave markets are only a "hypothetical tangent" to the extent that his beliefs are not implemented. It's the logical extension of what he lays out in the book in question. What would be the point of this "tangent" otherwise? It only precludes adult slaves. Stefan Molyneux is not Murray Rothbard and his squeamishness over children is itself inconsistent and is not reflective of Rothbard. Children obviously do not have "self-ownership". Pretending that their future self-ownership as adults has some transitive property wherein it applies to a babe on the tit is obviously false. All in all it's just more spergy nonsense to square this circle wherein even having children is "Socialism" and children obviously violate the NAP by not being able to support themselves. So naturally all dependents are "owned" by their caretakers. Or your ideas are just patently ridiculous and don't require this kind of pedantic Jewry.

This is that degeneracy we were talking about. Essentially you've got no moral objection to what is happening per se. Your moral objection is over this Leftist construct of voluntarism being violated. If people choose to do something for their personal gain it's morally good because the only moral good is shekel maximization and absolute freedom from "oppression" which of course is totally unearned and is simply granted to all of humanity because of radical egalitarian premises. Of course it is not justified and cannot be justified.

So when an oligarch maintains a host of foreign laborers or a humanitarian institution relocates them in a fire and forget fashion it was all "voluntary" so therefore it's all above board. You are literally a far-left fucking degenerate psychopath wanking over spergy utopian nonsense which is antithetical to human life.

Of course they are. That's irrelevant though as living in a nice white country is better than living in 3rd world shit holes, so living among whites as a non-white is always going to be materially more beneficial to the non-white. As the immigrant could not have possibly contributed t the conditions in white societies it is always freeriding even when there is no welfare. The imigrant cannot even pay in reciprocity as his own society is antithetical to whites meaning labor liquidity is always a one way street. You've simply taken the status quo and determined it should be implemented over longer time horizons and target a leadership cohort among tribalistic brown people rather than the rabble. So instead of getting hordes of the unwashed now we get hardened middleman minorities who operate within our societies with their hardwired tribalism versus our hardwired altruism while their societies remain closed and ethnically pure. Great ideas you fucking faggot.

The only reason this is relevant is because 719646 had a completely thoughtless dissection of the label national libertarian. I don't care about the ethos, I'm not any kind of libertarian.


I likely am, but you are just misunderstanding what I'm trying to convey.


Read what I wrote: "left and right libertarianism (not like they're so entirely different, I understand)." I know that they don't have massive ideological differences.

I get that, I appreciate the bit of analysis there too. I mean that sincerely, I'm not denying your education, I just think we're arguing different things here.

Here's what you wrote:

I don't know anything about the other poster, I took your statement to indicate you felt there was a difference between libertarianism and national libertarianism in the same vein that socialism is different from national socialism.


I'm not interested in contesting this, I don't know a lot about the origins of socialism.


That's very interesting


All I'm saying is that if National Socialism can become a unique ideology, differing from Nationalism and Socialism, then the previous poster, 719646, was wrong in deconstructing National Libertarianism in the manner he chose to.


I'm not a leftist or a libertarian, but I appreciate the dramatic diction. I am of the opinion free(ish)-market capitalism is more efficient in an economic sense than socialism, that's the only regard in which I pay any mind to "National Libertarianism". I was assuming he meant Libertarian in the American sense, which while having all the flaws of leftist philosophy like you laid out, also has a pretty strong economic system outside open borders, global free trade, etc. You can feel free to argue that I am wrong, but that isn't want I meant to argue, I just thought the actions of poster 719646 were lame. I do appreciate everything you wrote, I'll be sure to study up on everything you brought up.

Wrong, that affects the whole nation thus nationalist policy is applied.
Domestic policy is for example, "Should Texas lower its imports(from other states) of materials they produce in an attempt to encourage extra local production?" You then apply libertarian policy, "Let them decided what they want to do with their economic imports and exports."
Another would be, "Old railroad junction is not in use but is an eyesore, should we tear it down or raise taxes to repurpose it? The libertarian policy would be, "It is the town's building, let the town and the people who are involved decide how they want to use it."

Yeah, liberal in the classical sense. Even Locke, the father of liberalism, said man needs hedge around him to keep him on track.

I've already explained why this is a nationalist policy for a libertarian government. It is a net benefit for the domestic population according to the economics underpinning libertarianism. Why then would the government dedicate itself to actively harming the domestic population?

This isn't a libertarian policy. "Texas" can't decide to do anything pertaining to the economy as the government has no say in these kinds of decisions at all and local governments might as well not exist.


No, that isn't what I meant to convey. National Socialism and Socialism are distinct for various reasons, some of which I've already stated. None of these reasons apply to National Libertarianism which remains an oxymoron.

National Socialism as a term and National Libertarianism as a term are not symmetrical. National Socialism is free to to be seperate from modern understandings of Socialism while National Libertarianism is not. National Socialism doesn't even resemble Socialism in the modern context and modern Socialists reject it on a foundational level as working towards a cross purpose. That National Socialism engenders the opposite of Socialism. In short it shares very little of the same DNA and the name is a historical quirk. Sort of like how Federalism is the position that opposes a strong national government in the USA and the faction that supported Federalism were the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists of course being opposed to Federalism. If you had the opportunity to name them today, you certainly would certainly choose different names.

National Libertarianism clearly is just Libertarianism with some patchwork addendums to shore up when following Libertarianism has negative consequences when viewed from a non-Libertarian perspective. National Libertarianism is not Libertarianism but it is trying to be a functional version of that dysfunctional ideology. It would be rejected by Libertarians based on grounds that it is a flawed implementation of Libertarianism that is inconsistent. It is Libertarianism corrupted by the "false" premises of anti-liberal ideologies and not a discrete ideology of its' own.

National Socialism is not a cobbled together set of views from anti-Socialists who were tribally invested in Socialism as a movement and were just attempting to make it work because they couldn't let go of the Socialist dream. It's its' own thing.

Well it's a free market or it isn't. The degree to which Capitalism is 'more efficient' is entirely dependent on the degree to which you adhere to the moral philosophy of the early Capitalists. If you don't agree with them you probably aren't going to like what Capitalism does over the long term.

I could go into more detail about the deficiency of Economics as a field of study, but its' largely not germane. Suffice it say that the entire field is run on a tautology wherein it is underpinned by a particular moral philosophy, but as moral philosophy is not itself a part of the field of Economics the underpinnings of the field cannot be questioned within the field making the formal study of economics only capable of coming to certain conclusions about the efficacy of actual economic policy that work in service to the implicit moral philosophy of the field.

Gex is German and names the jew, Pigeon is a possible jew from Canada who's currently living in Japan.

...

lmfao

Journal cropped, contrast increased, artificially sharpened and zoomed. Still illegible

No, he's redpilled on kikes and the JQ…he just finds it intriguing that it's become the central focus of the community, often at the expense of other more urgent issues.

Weaboos are the worst.

lol what the fuck do you mean

Woes seems like one of the good guys, so let's hope he comes through.

>"but I'm not telling you what it is ;) that's for my next video"

haha this is bullshit but I laughed

I liked Holla Forums better when it wasn't filled with retards and disinfo fucks such as yourself. Adam Wallace is right, places like Holla Forums are being packed with stupid fucking normies who are into this shit because it's edgy. Very few of you have the wit and intelligence to back up any of your rhetoric. That's why to retreat back into overused and misused terms like "controlled opposition".

Fuck off.

Like that isn't true for a fuckton of people on Holla Forums as well.

Is it normie to call everyone a fucking plant? I don't think so. It's just shitty, not normie. Adam Wallace is an uberintellectual fag. Nice guy, but he's too damn concerned. It's a bit pathetic. He can't take a joke.

But I agree the guy you responded to is shit.

...

*That's why you retreat back

How do you know this?

he's a troll

O am I laffin. I bet you also think the moneygrubbing yellow-teeth whore Evalion is "le queen of Holla Forums"

Will you punish the families of the homosexuals, because they got a homosexual son or brother?

Few whites with children will agree to punish the children of their friends and family for being homosexuals, if history is a guide, as it's not very hard to find men living with men, and women in man's clothing living with an other women.

What is hard to find, is anybody writing down that they were homosexuals, as they were forced to behave in public like everybody else.
PS

MW explains in the comment section what upset him

You seem to have the exact opposite understanding of what I am explaining.
Libertarianism describes the means of which the government opperates(when it comes to itself and the citizens). Nationalism describes the goals/ends of the citizens and the insitutions/government that they create.
Nationalists do not want immigration of other cultures and peoples not of the nation.
no it isn't, economically it is measureable how it isn't. And as a nationalist too you should know the determent that would have.
It wouldn't
yes it is, libertarianism is very big on states' rights and local government with high representation. You are still using the european definition, which has nothing to do with the American definition.
all three of these are contradictory. Local governments are great. As long as people follow the federal laws, if they want to have additional laws for their personal community there is no objections.
Texas can decide what it wants to do because it has a state legislature and local elections. If they want to create a statewide campaign to label Texas produced materials to encourage texans to prefer texas made products they have every right and the means to.
This one in particular is just wacky. Even NatSoc germany had local governments and representation from local communities. Saying American libertarianism wants to abolish local governments is just insane.

Also you are wrong about the admixture of Nationalism and Libertarianism.
Assume that there was a second American revolution and Nationalist Libertarianism won. Of all the policies enacted, about 80% of them would be Nationalist, and the rest Libertarian. While the old policies that were stopped or ended, 40% would be ended for libertarian reasons, and 60% for Nationalist reasons.

Think of it like this, (I am also suggesting Nationalist Libertarianism for America, not any other country or people) if you take National Socialism, subtract all the parts that are not strictly nationalist, and replace anything you got rid of with applicible American libertarian equivelents, then you have Nationalist Libertarianism.


Also it is a minor thing, but it is not called "National Libertarianism." it is "Nationalist Libertarianism."

We need truth-tellers as much as leaders, so why does MW have to be a leader, if he don't won't to?

I don't think we need leaders, as that will only give the cucks somebody to put pressure on, and open source politics have worked well so far with BUGS.

On top of this you have infighting among shitposters and the more serious-minded and you end up with the alt right today as where GG was in November of 2014. Kiss it goodbye, gentlemen.

Kek, photobucket's easy to hack, but I doubt he had one tbh.

I don't even know who the hell this is…

REMINDER

The plan is to take over ALL the political parties, not to make new ones.

All the political parties use mobile phones and the internet today in order to win, so once the ball get's rolling in the pro-white direction through the populist right, it will be the left that will need to uncuck themselves to get power.

That will move the populist right more pro-white, and as the priesthood is still open, and the normal-fags will continue to virtue signal, it will be being pro-white and uncucked that will be the new orthodoxy.

Woe to our grandchildren though, as it will be our orthodoxy that they get to revolt against.

A Little late to this thread. Haven't seen Renegade mentioned much on Holla Forums either here or on halfchan. That being said, i hardly ever post. I mostly lurk.

I am the former host of a program a few years back that only lasted 2 months on Renegade. The circumstances of my show being dismissed seemed dubious, at best. Kyle Hunt accused me of being a disinformation agent meant to derail his "White Man March" program he had going at the time. I fully supported this initiative, so his claim is false.

Regardless, my program was called "The Eagle and the Snake" and it is still on the archives.

Interested to know if there is any demand for me to re-start my show.

I still don't know what to make of the Renegade Crowd. It appears that my appearance caused a rift in the major figures present at the time (This was 2014) and i aligned with the group i felt was more genuine in opposition to the Jew.

My show was rapidly becoming very popular and overtaking the listernership of the other shows on the network, perhaps this is why i was let go?

this isn't actually proof of what you guys are claiming

He's probably average height.

Adam cites Radix Journal as highbrow neoreactionary journalism in his on the future of the alt right video. L@FF

These people perhaps enjoy prepping the Roosh as much as Richard Spencer. I'm going to enjoy seeing these people run roughshod over by dumb angry chan agitators.

I don't know what his fucking problem is.

I've been on the chans for like 3 yrs now, and it's always been like this. The alt right is no worse now, it's just that he's losing confidence that his NRx stuff is going to be the number one thing people focus on.

Kind of pathetic.

they're completely fucking obsessed with Jews, how could anyone be more anti Jew than renegade?

They exist for the hardest of hardcore stormniggers, the most intense of purists that the right can dream of. Not worth the time or energy.

I kind of feel sorry for them. I can tell Kyle means well, but his site is just so pathetic.

And you're right, yea.

weak fag

Renegade/Firestarter are feminists and nigger-lovers. They are practically jew puppets, regardless of their anti-jew rhetoric.

he looks like a goblin, too. A friendly and relatively attractive goblin, but still.

How could anyone be more anti-jew than renegade?

I don't know. I've been out of their community for about 2 years now.

Okay… i guess what i meant to say is i was part of what i considered the "REALIST" faction.

Not the batshit-upsidedown-NUTS faction.

It all started with this guy who called literally every show on the network. His name was Jim. At first, i thought, he's just a crazy old guy who figured out the truth about the world far too late.

Then he started calling my show, and i listened to the other shows and saw how everyone danced around him with kid gloves. I wanted my show to be legitimate and taken seriously by people. Not to be a laughing stock.

How do you handle it when this guy calls into my show about something real that i am reading passages from a book about, and starts telling me we can't and shouldn't physically harm the jews ever, because that would be bad karma, and because "You see, the jews are a metaphysical challenge placed here to test our Aryan supremacy"

This same guy would call my show and start talking about the 4th reich which is real and the reason we can't see them is they are in another dimension but the same physical space. They are safe from the jews there, and they fly the red white and blue swastika flag and wear orange jumpsuits.

I shit you not, this stuff would fly out of this guy's mouth like it was nothing. One day i got so angry i called him out live on air and put him in his place. I said keep your crazy science fiction bullshit off of my show, we're talking reality here.

Not to mention that the Renegade website for articles (Renegade tribune) about 70% of the articles are written by this same guy. I started writing articles that disagreed with him.

Soon i'm being repremanded for being mean to him, and not long after that i lose my show.

Come to find out this old nut donates mega thousands of shekels to renegade every month.

they're so pathetic I want to vomit when I watch their stuff.

they're what the term stormfag was invented to describe

for all your supposed extremism, you won't ever do shit but shitpost online. nothing you say here will become real by your own hand. even if ramz is wrong, he's more of a man than you are because of it.

Is Pastor Lindstedt of the bowel movement in this thread?

maybe he is sick or something.
It can kinda fuck with your head, but also when he said hur I'm a voice for the alt-right. I was thinking, how many people do really listen to him.

Did not check it out, since it would be a niche audience to begin with. It would be the same people that listen to fash the nation and the daily shoah. If they like the trolling on True Capitalist Radio even ghost has a larger following I would believe because the shit he comes up with are genuinely funny.

Plus the radio graffiti and twitter shout outs are the highlights.

So what do people like with Millennial Woes? Since the two I watch of his hangouts was with Sargon. The first one was so full of Autism where everyone wanted to take their 2 cents to everything.

While the other one Sargon was btfo.
most leftist believes this theory of colonialism is wrong, and it destroyed a already fucked up country. They try to be hur individualism even tough the niggers in south Africa even says don't trust individual niggers. And its better to show em whom is the boss.

Well he has a lot of fans out there, lots of people like him (like me). I know it's in the thousands, he has around 10K followers right now.

His channel is just damned good.

The S stands for syndrome

You shouldn't nut hug Ramzpaul just because he takes his paypal shekels and gets drunk in Eastern Europe with them and now he's butt hurt he doesn't have his own show on Fox yet. He hates you.

I may not be a big big man but so far I've helped a crooked retirement home get it's shit wrecked, I've refocused my priorities on my family, I got my boss to stop exploiting the hard working retard and fought until that fucker got his raise. I'm not hardcore anything, nor saving the world but I do what I can about the corruption I see around me which is the difference between the before apathetic deluded me, and the now me. That's really what it's about.

You see that video of his about the "black pill". Keeps saying "Trump won't win, muh demographics" Give up? He's doing this because he's lost heart. He's telling us to give up too. Fuck Ramz.

Let's pretend he is a pro-white leftist, but the only pro-whites are found on the right?

Is the correct thing then to become a voice for the alt right, when he mainly want white people to survive?

I'll bet you OP was one of them.

idiot detected

Why?

RamZ is a good guy. What's your reason for bashing him?

I really liked Ramz and he pulled a 180 in the last few months.

How do you morons think putting so much power in the hands of an unknown is going to play out to your benefit?

"Alt-right" still means being red pilled on race, being identitarian to some degree, respecting tradition and recognizing that people with names which echo are behind most events and organizations that attack the above positions. It's goons and tweens that want you to think the only acceptable political views are waiting for hitler and being full kikedeath at all times.

We tried that in the 80s and 90s, it was embarrassing and the red suspenders weren't flattering to the lumpy bodies of the untermensch jail fodder the movement attracted.

frankly any celebs, e or not tend to cause stupidity and decadence as idiots star fawning and fanboying for them which makes them think they can get away with anything.

Watching a youtube channel doesn't give anyone any power over me. I enjoyed his videos, now I don't and I think he's a douche. I'm voicing my opinion. Big fucken deal. The original poster I was replying too was sucking Ramz's cock because he was "more of a man" than us and I was countering that claim. I watched Ramz for entertainment and some positive reinforcement. Now I don't because he pozzed himself. This shit aint on me.

There's a lot of virtue signalling and groupthink around WN that is cultlike and mirrors the SJWs.

He's wrong.

Universal Income is the only economic policy that makes sense once AI factories become a thing.

I disagree, but Evola didn't and Evola was smarter than anyone reading this.

Maybe his fanbase should stop attacking him for wrongthink.

You sound like a legitimate fucking retard, if you had a hand in bolstering his popularity you had a hand in giving him power and influence over a significant number of people. It's as simple as that.

Agreed user we should remain completely neutral on everything, libertarians R us.

lol, so any program you watched it's your fault if something you don't support was ever on it. After all you contributed to the ratings. If you ever watched TV talmudivision is your fault. We'll burn together in hell.

Nope, but Holla Forums is like SJWs because both bully its adherents into conforming to extreme opinions. Having to remind people that you really totes hate the jews before you say something nuanced is the same as an SJW checking their own privilege before saying something that goes against libtard orthodoxy.

don't let the stormfaggot demographic define Holla Forums, good Holla Forumsacks don't punch their fellow WNists like Anglin does

No, there are many that are left that say they are alt-right. So I'm alt-right in a nationalist perspective
and believe there should be more nationalism, and ethnicity and culture is what make countries great in Europe since there is so much culture. But now its shit down upon.

well, I don't follow the dude.
But sometimes when you have it over your head that you have 10k or more listening the ego comes out. Or it can fuck with your head, with Sargon he has more or less just taken jewtube as a job which is kinda dumb.

6cb1d1 should post often.

NRx turned out complete shit, but the article isn't about them. It uses them as an example. Everything he says is right.

Alt-right turned from anons discussing mannerbunds, debating philosophy - Plato, Aquinas, Evola and rediscovering tradition into FUCK YOU DAD edgy populists.

Sauce or gtfo

seriously I don't know wtf you're talking about

Just a bad day he'll do more uncucking

Man this entire thread is a shit-show.

Does anyone on this board have any degree of self-awareness anymore?

They're Semitic. There was a brief Sub Saharan African rule. They were also a multi-ethnic culture structurally. I doubt this changed much even after all the Greek and Roman rape. Not sure what he means by this specifically. Especially since a lot of them are Greek.

Hitler in particular had a love affair/obsession with an ancient Egyptian statue of Nefertiti.

To be fair, Egypt has been a mix of many groups, and conquered many times. The race/culture exists more for the tourism industry and to claim artifacts from foreign museums.

We know them today as tomb raiders and from the desecration of their pyramids when the casings were ripped away to rebuild Mosques following a series of catastrophic Earthquakes.

I don't understand, but those crusades were harsh. Nothing wrong with the Eastern Crusaders.

Well, gotta laugh when you can.

I'm surprised he's convinced there's such a thing as racially white. It's hard to fathom from historical considerations. If anything it's more there to say who and what isn't white.

Big talk from a shitlord pissbaby misogynist.

This tbh.

I'm very happy to ally myself with NatSocs and Fascists. But to focus ENTIRELY on fucking Hitler just gets cringeworthy and simply unproductive.

I think Woes has to go back and do more pontificating like he used to.

I hope Adam and Woes do a video to sort all this out.

From Håvamål.

47

Long ago I was young,
I travelled on my own,
then I turned astray in my paths:
I thought myself rich
when I found another,
man is man's entertainment.

43
A man must be a friend
to his friend,
for himself and for the friend,
but no man must
be a friend of a friend
of his foe.

44
Know, if you have a friend
in whom you have faith,
and you wish to get something good from him,
you must share with his mind
and exchange gifts,
and go often to seek him out.

45
If you have another
whom you mistrust,
but you want to get something good from him,
you must speak fair to him,
and think deceitful thoughts,
and give deception in return for a lie.

46
There is more about the one
whom you mistrust
and whose disposition you suspect:
you should laugh with him
and speak other than your thought.
There should be repayment for such gifts.

Only the current "egyptians" are arabs. The actual egyptians were hamitic with a Western-celtic ruling class. Ramses II was a ginger and DNA analysis on King Tut showed that 75% of Brits are related to him while only 1% of modern egyptians are (it's 85% in Cornwall IIRC).
That one Nubian dynasty was fucking ANC in South-Africa tier.

That is actually a modern fabrication. The Pyramids were still in good condition during the reign of the Mamluks (who were Christian Europeans btw). It all went to shit after Napoleon invaded with Champolion at the helm of cultural destruction, so he would be the only source of authority left on the original state of those artefacts after the Mamlukian aristocracy was annihilated and the Coptic faith was disbanded for two generations.

Daily reminder that Napoleon ordered his troops to fire at the Sphynx

Yes R1bs. That's the non-Nordic/Germanic inheritance of Britain. When people say the Egyptians were White, they are implying Nordic, when clearly, as we see through genetics and their own freakin statues…. The Gyppos were Mediterranean mystery meat with even asiatic features at times.

No one still thinks that, save for afrocentric types.

W E
E

...

Can someone explain this meme?

No they weren't.
The pyramids didn't always have those step like sides, they used to be covered in smooth white stone. The kebabs destroyed those stones to build fucking mosques and fortresses.

This however is an actual modern fabrication.
Not just any modern fabrication but one done by "we wuz kangz" Afrocentrists.

According to "Les observations de plusieurs singularitez et choses memorables trouvées en Grèce, Asie, Judée, Egypte, Arabie et autres pays étrangèrs" by a 16th century historian called Pierre Belon the Sphinx was already destroyed.
This should not be shocking, mudslimes destroy art and statues in all the countries they rule. Like those giant greco-buddist statues.

He did? I don't bother watching the longer videos, but in his latest few I've noticed Sargon keeps strawmanning nationalists and likening them to SJW.

The manosphere and alt right are having a shit flinging contest because feminism is basically too easy to bash on. Feminism is being eroded so they want new targets to make reaction videos to and they're going at each other. It's fucking stupid but there you go.

1:15:55, start there and watch for like 20 minutes or whatever, they pretty much break it down and they have clips as well. Skip through that section until you hear the soundbites if you don't want to hear them blow Sargon out themselves

Surge in popularity due to his
RACE WAR NOW
video.

When the Trump shills bump Trump threads, then we need to bump threads as well.

Not too much, as the constant Trump bumping will turn off pro-whites in time to become Trumps biggest critic, once Trump is elected.

...

Fuck off cultist. Also all eclebs are cancer and the obsession with them here proves this board is filled with underage b& who can't absorb information from any other media because they were raised on youtube.

He did a fucking 3 hour and 40 minute video of him going through his DVD collection.

I mean, I love Woes, but got he's a bit autistic.

tbh autists are usually the most cosy people. The introverted ones, not the ones that don't know when to shut their lying jewish mouths.

that Autism is almost like tamers12345

isn't everyone here at least a little bit autistic?

So what did he have a crisis of faith or did Holla Forums scare him away?

guessing he got raped by a pack of niggers

He's saying that the alt-right has been co-opted by a bunch of unthinking edgelord anons, that 8/pol/'s become too zealous and 4/pol/ too normie-friendly.

You're part of the problem

Can you elucidate more on your economic thoughts? Or, perhaps, give me some literature that's critical of the field?

How and where did you acquire these incredible mind-reading abilities, user?

When people say that, they're the WN equivalent of vid related

There's a place for everybody, you know? If you seriously think you're going to moderate opinions you've taken up a futile task.

Autists that meme gas chambers are as important as intellectuals. Let me tell you something. Facts don't matter. We can use memes to bend reality. Intellectuals have done nothing of accomplishment. All the accomplishments are due to us. It's because we memed everything to happen. And we're going to meme gas chambers and death squads into reality. We're going to meme into reality a worldwide holocaust.

You need to take a look at the energy we have. If we weren't the edgelords you'd be the edgelords. You need us more than we need you so stop signalling that we're too extreme because it'll: 1) not do anything and 2) if we did disappear you would become the edgelord

You don't even understand the forces behind us.

Yea we will criticize him. But he still will probably be in the top 5 presidents.

I'm not saying I agree with him. I think the risk of fracture between anons and the MPC/NPI crowd is worse than 4/pol/ being pozzed and 8/pol/ being unthinking and retarded. However, that's low on the list. I agree, extremists are really fucking necessary to anchor moderates provided the two sides don't turn on one another.

And guess what's happening right now?

Yeah we need to be more cohesive, I cannot imagine trying to tame an anonymous image board though.

The Alt-Right will go the way of OWS and GG before long. You're already starting to see it now with how Renegade Radio's acting and the whole Trash Right thing. What this means going forward for our causes, I'm not sure, but it can't be a good thing if what happened to OWS and GG's causes is any indication.

top lel

The worst issue is the "existence" of the Alt Right. There should be a deliberate effort to position ourselves as AT LEAST the "emerging right" or, even better, just "The Right". There is no need for this low tier, infomercial level intellectual marketing in the image of NRx, especially not now that there's momentum.

Agreed. TDS have more or less dropped the name, and I hate using it, personally. Just go by "the right."

I 've noticed that these people are almost as sensitive as SJWs. I try to talk to them every now and again, but forget I'm not on the chans, so I just end up scaring them or triggering them or whatever.

Honestly, if I ever have a son, I'm going to make sure the only internet community he's part of is 32chan so that he doesn't become a softie fag who complains about those "14/88er meanie heads."

Energy goes where it goes and if you try to fight the current you'll tire yourself out. There's not going to be a backlash of moderate nationalism. When the masses mobilise in a direction it's not a movement of introspection and rationality. If you think "14/88ers" are too much just wait until the scared normies jump on.

It'll be hyper nationalism; an equal and opposite reaction and the only reaction to white genocide is global white supremacy and genocide. Gas chambers are outdated, though. It'll probably be genome targeting bio weapons. There's going to be genocide and a lot of blood.

Have you ever watched Adam Wallace's videos before? He considers Spencer and Radix to be inherently leftist/liberal.


This meme needs to die.

Tip: Nationalism and Socialism are both post-enlightenment secular ideologies and are therefore inherently leftist in nature

Still, I can't help but wonder if Trump winning will kill the energy or send it to the left.

I'm not one of those faggots that says you can't have fun, I just hate how much attention all those eclebs youtubers get here. Its getting to point I'm having trouble following the conversation in some threads because I'm not subscribed to 50+ autistic pseudo intellectuals.

Why because I'm not a groupie for the aforementioned mob of autistis?

If one word of this post is serious you are the dumbest motherfucker on Holla Forums at the moment, and if it's ironic, fuck you.

He's right though. Name one intellectual on the right who had any influence at all in recent years. You will not be able to do so because they are irrelevant. Memes>>>facts or arguments. It has always been this way and always will.

Fuck Holla Forums I thought they had fixed this shit

Any movement that forms to oppose something will fall this way. You cannot unite people against an enemy for long, you can only unite them around a common goal.

This is why all the anonymous online movements fall. They're against something not for something. Too many reasons to be against things and too little common ground

No, you're just a miserable, stupid faggot. The entire thing that separates the right from the left is facts. You're asking us to embrace stupidity, lies and retardation because of an utterly idiotic concept like "meme magic". Fuck you, even if you're being sarcastic. This board does not need to get any stupider.

You understand that the problems of mass immigration aren't going to stop if Trump gets elected and does everything he says? It's inevitable that those problems reach a boiling point. If Trump gets elected everybody isn't going to sing kumbaya and all the problems stop.

If moderate nationalists like Richard Spencer were to take power right now they'd save everyone a lot of death and heartache. But that's not going to happen. The energy of liberalism is headed toward a boiling point with catastrophic consequences. To stop that energy would be like standing in front of a train and trying to stop it in its tracks from falling off a cliff.

Facts don't matter.

And this post sums up why neoreaction is not actually reactionary. Moldburg and his sycophants are the most bourgeois/Jewish fucks on the planet.

Probably just underage b&

No, what separates the right from the.left is that the left wins and the right doesn't. Why does the left win? Because they know how to use rhetoric to their advantage while the right just regurgitates facts and logical arguments. Facts and logic work on 1-2% of the population who happens to be autistic enough to care. For the rest, they don't matter.

Take a look at Trump. Why is he winning? It isn't because he dishes out facts and arguments, now is it? No, it's because he insults everyone else and is a rhetorical genius.

Anyway, truly right wing doesn't care about facts either. You are talking about the bourgeois/liberal right based in empiricism and so on.

This tbh, nationalism goes hand in hand with democratism and socialism. They originate from the same era and are inherently linked. This doesn't mean that it isn't the best option now, which reflects how far things have changed.

Since you mentioned Trump I assume you are talking American terms. If that's the case that's not true at all the house is Republican controlled right now.

Yeah, and every time you do, we destroy your position and show you why libertarian nationalism is a contradiction, but you keep coming back. America is not and never has been libertarian. The founding fathers were not libertarian and libertarianism is not equal to classical liberalism. They are entirely different worldviews, the former being Jewish as fuck and cancer, and with the latter being Anglo-Saxon and at least halfway okay.

Pick one.

Well what is your definition of right wing then, Trump?

Incorrect.

Also incorrect.

We can distinguish between two types of reactionaries. Those who are reactionaries of form and those who are reactionaries of essence. Most who call themselves reactionaries are reactionaries of form. They want a recreation of early modern period Christian monarchies. They focus entirely on form (ironically a degenerated form itself) and miss the forest for the trees.

A national socialist is a reactionary of essence. His goal is not recreation but rejuvenation. You can think of an analogous situation in the Roman Empire during Christianization. The reactionaries of form would be those clinging to the old Roman religion and wanting to recreate the Roman republic or whatever, while the reactionaries of essence were moving to Christianity. You can imagine the old Roman reactionaries of form complaining about the Christians as being revolutionary or ahistorically calling them "left-wing" or whatever.

Not the GOP?

Where does the concept of the two reactionaries come from? It sounds really interesting.

I meant that they are not even right wing within an American context. They are crypto-democrats. Republicans controlling Congress is meaningless because all they do with that power is cuck for the Democrats or refuse to do anything. The purpose of the Republican party in America is to lose, and even they know it.

Egyptians WERE Caucasian though, and he did say that. Is this his real twitter account?

Adam deleted his article and privatized his video. What's happening?

atcwallace.com/2016/05/08/on-the-changing-face-of-the-alt-right/
archive.is/lYrri

Sounds interesting enough for you to try something out again under your own thing perhaps. Or do it under the wing of RedIce who are branching out and are openly begging for manpower and ideas. Whatever you want to do of course, it'd be completely understanable if you are weary of getting under someones wing again after such treatment. But I'll repeat, Henrik and Lana are really eager to get people on board with their own things so you doing some radio show might be welcomed with open arms there.

Probably because he was getting btfo in the comments.

Socialism is and Nationalism is very arguable, but the difference with NatSoc is that it's only a means to an end. It is only a temporary chemotherapy that prepares the nation for a new traditionalistic future. Which was planned by the Third Reich within the Schutzstaffel if they would've had their way after a victorious total war, to create a new virile, landowning, martial, aristocracy to drive the nation forward.

You simply can't revert to pre-enlightenment traditionalism after it had been so thoroughly broken by the Jacobins and Jews. And that is the problem with most NRx autists (and related monarchists/traditionalists) who don't want to realise this and rather stay in the realm of political philosophy instead of planning actual strategies of achieving this traditionalism.


Sounds like concept of his own design to me.

The "socialism" of national socialism is not even new either.

These idiots act like ideas exist in time (a very untraditional understanding BTW), so when one idea "comes from" another tainted one, then it transfers the poz from one to the next. But it doesn't work that way.

I didn't even say I was 14/88, just that it's funny how everyone gets so butthurt over them.


Hello, Ramz.

He actually wasn't.

probably this

This is why I would have fought the Nazis during the war.

Anyone saying this is not conservative, you're an SJW. This is the exact same garbage they've been spewing for years, look where it's gotten them? Universal scorn, mocked by both sides of the political spectrum, on the verge of getting banned from university.

ANYONE SAYING FACTS DON'T MATTER IS AN SJW TRYING TO DESTROY US FROM WITHIN. I IMPLORE YOU TO IGNORE THIS FLAGRANT RETARDATION AND SHAME IT WHEREVER YOU SEE IT.

So you're saying Trump is a liar? No one's accused him of being a genius, climb off it. He just hires the right people, and no one else in his field was remotely as well known as him.

I really fucking hope he wins this election for a number of reasons, but one of them is that if he loses this board is fucking dead and has been completely subverted.

IF FACTS DON'T MATTER SOMEONE CAN SIMPLY MEME JEWS INTO BEING GOOD PEOPLE AND WHITES RIGHT OUT OF EXISTENCE. IF FACTS DON'T MATTER THAN CRIME STATISTICS AND IQ CORRELATIONS DON'T MATTER. IF FACTS DON'T MATTER THAN FEMINISTS CAN KEEP CLAIMING 1 IN 4 WOMEN GET RAPED. BECOMING THE LEFT ISN'T DEFEATING THE LEFT, IT'S JUST BECOMING THE LEFT AND GIVING THEM ANOTHER VICTORY.

Now stop saying utterly worthless drivel on this board you fucking imbeciles.

Who?

I take offense to that. NRx, at least the interesting core that is doing something other than fap to AI accelerationism, is heavily natsoc-sympathetic in the way you describe. NRx is not about returning to muh kings and muh kike on a stick. It is much closer to the SS thing.

fucking top post m8, hopefully after the election year some of the normalfags will fuck off and the ratio will be better, but I am afraid that this intellectual community or culture or movement or whatever has been permenently flooded with normalfags. any blog in the WN sphere now has like 600 different narcissistic namefagging retards shitposting in them and the number of low intelligence women and other scum who are latching on for attention is growing. we need to strictly enforce elitism in the ranks IMO.

holy fuck mad dog Lindstedt!!!! damn post pic with timestamp if you are here brother, you are like the GG allin of WN, fucking damn though I would most assuredly join your post happening trailerpark empire

Labelhaters pls die

Intellectuals are important, and sometimes the hardcore alt right nazi types go too far, but honestly yea NRx are just afraid to be real about race.

"It's not all about race. Mussolini and Evola said race is 95% mental" is what they always say.

Very pathetic. But at least they're bringing people to anti left ideologies, which is good.

nice dacian pepe

SAGE & REPORT FOR FAGGOTRY

no thanks, Chaim

okay, then who is this faggot and what is going on? I don't want to hear melodrama bullshit. And, I'm not interested in this thinly veiled attempt at advertising

Precisely what faggots say when they don't have an argument.

MWs runs a great alt right channel, that's what he does.

Except none of them are elite, so it wouldn't work.

Funny thing is neither of those guys said anything like that.

Actually Mussolini said there are no pure races, and Evola said race is 95% mental

Neither are authorities on racial reality. HBD didn't even exist back then. Checkmate, Italian fascists.

fair enough. I'll check it out. TRS is cool, I guess… I mostly just like the Daily Shoah bc its pretty funny

I recommend the most-of-the-time awesome Radix podcast, too, available on Radixjournal. It's not as entertaining as TRS but it's jam packed with interesting info. It's high quality.

People have to learn about all these different alt right things, they're all mostly good.

what the fuck are you doing here? please never post again

Implying mental isn't also founded in biology and genetics.

good point fam

tbh lad, we are some pretty badass mofos.

Read some Goebbels faggot.

We do not own the media, but we are the masters of propaganda.

Also
Sage for e-celeb bullshit.

stupid moron detected fam

The article was deleted but I've salvaged it from the Bing :^) cached page and archived it:

archive.is/fCg1o

This video is full of nothing but Nationalist and Nat Soc political parties and activist groups actively taking to the streets and growing real legitimate movements.
youtube.com/watch?v=q-nz5YaURTg

Meanwhile reacto intellectuals remain in secluded social groups prattling on about theory and 'decorum'.

Where are the 'Reactionary' movements? Where are the 'Monarchist' movements? Where is the physical manifestation of the so called 'Darkly Enlightened?'

Nowhere…


That's a minority of troublemakers. Most are not bothered.


Reactos who cry about Populism are deluded. Do you think the original Reactos weren't populist in some form? You're competing with corporate global markets and mass progressive socialist movements and you want to play some moral high ground? You're at war, boys and girls. There's no time for pussyfooting around. There's a reason AltRight went 1488 while NRx went the way of the dodo. They saw Golden Dawn tackle the Establishment, they watched Generation Identity block bridges while Ukrainian Nash occupied Kiev. They saw National Action fly their flag on cranes as the Sliders of Odin defended their streets. They watched Germans burn fugee centers and dutch assault fugee council meetings. They saw Fash going real-world. They saw a billionaire promise to build a wall. Behind every action to destroy Western Civilization was a hand wringing semite, Alt-Right recognized that. Anyone that doesn't is lying to themselves.

London now has a Muslim Islamist mayor. The time for theory and projection is over. Now is the time for social engineering and movement recruitment.

If you don't like the successes of other groups, then go hide in your basement. You will never achieve anything as you are. You will remain as living proof of your ideals unwillingess to adapt, proving its inherent weakness to deal with the real world.

You are Cato at the fall of the Republic, spergishly musing over the rise of Caesar. Your kind couldn't adapt then and you refuse to do it now. There are many obstacles in the way of power, reactos. Your own apathy and fear, your physical incapability, the anti fascists who will spit and beat you, the police who will subvert and control you, to the higher tiers of power who will ferment global wars to retain power. Do you really think your theorized special utopia on paper is going to save Western Civilization from the abyss?

Grow up. Man up. Shape up. We're better off together than apart and our future is at stake. 1488 is doing more than you and if you truly want to show it up, get active like they are and prove us all wrong.

Or you can keep moaning from afar lacking the basic self-awareness to see how ineffective you truly are.

On the subject of:

Do what you need to do, bro. But don't let the abyss get you down. It's not over by a long shot. Every action by the enemy makes people more aware. People like you just need to keep doing what you do and point it out. It's your channel, do what you want.

Jesus you're still shitposting here?


Get a job man.

wow

I have one, this is from my phone

Autistic label loner detected

Altistic*

Again.. Fucker. Something important to say but no spoilers. SAVE IT FOR THE FUTURE VIDEO. Millenial woes should be executed.

Here's your (you)

Which isn't really the same thing as saying race is mental.

He did not say anything like this. Only retards who haven't read his books say this, but Evola wrote about race in a biological and hereditary context all the time.

Anyone who takes this shit e-celeb shit seriously beyond bants is an autistic faggot.

gossip is for women

fair enough. come over here; we're brainstorming about how to spread our message.

8ch.net/pol/res/5951410.html#5954494

And while we are on the topic, Guenon did not say anything like this, either, even though tradfags try to pretend he was all about "spiritual race." If you read his book "Introduction to the Study of the Hindu Doctrines," the very first chapter includes a discussion on race and how the particular characteristics of each can be attributed to the race (by which it is clear that he meant biological race), which helped determine the character of Western civilization and the eastern civilizations.

ok, sounds legit, but a lot of these radical traditionalist types are scared to be full on racial, it's kind of pathetic.

it's as though they think you can't be unequivocally pro-White without being unintellectual. makes no sense

it's not gossip it's intel

this

It makes sense when you understand that they are all faggots.

I'm starting to think you're right. I'm very slow to pass judgement. I want to see the best in everyone, even shitty people.

But they're starting to rub me the wrong way Jose. Check out the comments' section in the latest Adam Wallace blogcrap post
atcwallace.com/2016/05/10/musings-10th-of-may/

bump fam

I'm a fan of Adam, but Jesus Christ that was a buttmad blog-post.

He honestly sounds a bit like a NRO cuck.

he's amazingly pathetic

I mean if you're not going to take an anti PC pro-White POV, how can you even call yourself a traditionalist?

The traditional western world was White, and the left is trying to destroy that. The left openly attacks and tears down White culture(s) and people.

Wallace is full of shit.

here's the best most buttblasted part

His claim that whiteness is somehow a purely American idea sounds extremely suspicious. Also, it's not an argument. lol

His entire post is a strawman anyway. I have never seen any white nationalists who say that whites don't need to be good people, which seems to be what he is trying to imply here.

Also nice that he cites Brett Stevens, another absolute fag.

Amerika is a good site, actually.

A lot of "far right" people seem to feel the need to attack "those terrible worthless shitty racists". They want to feel better about themselves.

It's like they're really cuckservatives but don't want to admit it to themselves, since they realize mainstream cuckservatives are shit. But they're unwilling to just be pro-White.

Good riddance I guess

...

Audio sounds compressed

take no notice, it sounds identical to original.

The last video he made before his break from the channel was about MGTOW and the immigrants. In it, he revealed how thoroughly beta he is around his understanding of women, and I can only imagine that he realized that "Muh white whimmen" aren't being stolen by shitskins, they're running towards them in droves.

no he talked about how women WILL fuck migrants

stop the disinfo

literally who

The pastor is a master wordsmith that its hard to miss, but he needs to attack the kikes and kike-alikes, to quote another old timer from the bowel movement.

he is literally the GG allin of WN

Facts do matter. you are thinking like a marxist in that The People are unable to handle the facts.

Here the majority of the user base appears to ascribe to Goebbels' method of wording the facts in a way the normies can take.

this usually involves gallows humor.

...

He should become a trip-fag, so the rest recognize him.

The Alt-Right, especially Ramz, deserves the Ben Garrison treatment.

no

MW is the alt-right version of Gordon.

bmp

If Morty left a post here… it would be quite easy to recognize him.

That is what we did. Go look at what he writes under his own name at Radix for instance.

Woes figured out that MGTOW were right all along and that none of them give a shit about what he cares about and he's never going to be able to turn them on to nationalism or fight a race war and force them to breed with him

Is that what you are wishing to be true, as that would make you the smart nihilist, rather than the cuck in the corner that looks at what everybody else is doing?

Are you sure it's not that MW got an offer to join up with somebody, and that this might disappoint some pro-whites?

I don't like the white genocide meme, usually, but this image is great

it will make natural pro-in group Whites turn to our ideas.

good job

Nice meme you got there, I sure an a nihilist, you can see how I posted really nihilistic shit all over that mother fucking post.

I pointed out a valid point. Woes has slowly been waking up to the fact that white women do not give a fuck and will happily genocide him and every other man they see. Like it or not this is reality, white women don't care about white culture or white men, they only care about their gibs me dats and playing the vagina card. woes is very gynocentric and as such coming to this revelation would utterly destroy him.

Someone summarise this thread for me. Is MW ok ??

Bizarro Gordon?

There is no "Alt-right".

There's cuckservatives and there's us. That's it.

why not call us alt right? why so labelphobic?

Alt-right are the people who are too gay to be national socialists.

roooyt

cuz diss aint gay at all

That looks like Ginsberg, the mentally ill Jew. But the filename suggests it's Don's brother. What's going on here, did Don's brother look like his coworker?

...

They may not care about "white culture" but they IN REALITY don't want to ever have sex with a non-White man EVER. So they kinda do care about White men being around.

Have you talked a woman, outside your family?

...

No.

Even so, still less gay than ramzpaul.

The NSM is a completely shitty and pointless, disgusting movement, probably run by anti-Whites.

You're crazy if you don't see that. So it's good you're not one of us.

Then they would give Asians a chance. Instead they rate Asians worse than niggers. You know, niggers, those people you can give a million dollars to and they spend it all on bling, cars and drugs within a week.

Coalburning is a Jewish meme. They have celebrities promoting it in music videos or even in real life, see Heidi Klum, but that's all it is, a meme. The Jews are trying to make it real by repeating it often enough. So far they haven't succeeded. Niggers are unattractive to all women, except their own. And nigresses are even worse off. Not even niggers, their personal favourite pick, want them!

Basically, your cuck delusions are a result of a combination of

I don't know anything about them. They aren't national socialists if they are flying an American flag, though.

But still, less gay than ramzpaul, who is also run by anti-whites.

They fly an American flag with a swastika on it

I was out today and saw more mixed race couples than white couples. You are just in denial.

What else could there be? I told you that you would all turn on each other!

Ashes and Echoes

Even worse. Still, I see some normal American flags in that image.

Just fucking research the NSM, they're fucking cancer. Your view on RamZ is stupid, assuming you're not just a trollshit.

Good luck.

MGTOW's always been 100% correct in theory… but there's no quality control and it's not something most men will ever face willingly.

But feminists DO keep saying it, and they keep winning.

Facts don't matter. Nothing has ever mattered.

Only universeal Death

Ashes and Echoes

Whatever, MGTOW will continue to be right so long as the laws are the way they are and Jews still live.

Of course there is no quality control Everyone is shit and you know it. There is NO QUALITY!

Ashes and Echoes

Wikipedia doesn't have anything too objectionable on them.

And ramzpaul is a concern troll who e-shills on YouTube so he can afford to pay child support for his wife's kids

RamZ is pretty cool. and Jew wise

Can confirm, this is true, has has a history of depression. Met a guy who has known him for a long time.

He is anything but cool. And he is not Jew wise because he does not recognize the Jewish problem in its entirety.

NRx sucks hard because it can't be used to explore other options. It's an insular political cult that consistently moves to the left when challenged but dabbles in faux-debates and dismisses any actual ideological contest without defeating arguments from the right.

I'm not saying there's nothing to get out of it, I'm saying the surrounding culture is degenerative and only stalls out in the long term.

Actually he didn't delete any of it, it's just unlisted like around 30% of his videos. You can get it all via playlists and links in the descriptions of other videos, but nice attempt at smearing him


I am a friend of Woes, and I was the one who sent him the thread, you mongoloid. Shockingly, there is a pretty large overlap between pol browsers and woes viewers. If you ever ran any sort of online presence with a significant base, you would be alerted by yout watchers when people mentioned you, too.

Any intellectual movement is doomed to failure. Funny that the guys who rail against the enlightenment all the time fall into the same trap of overly intellectualizing everything.

Out where? In an urban area? I bet. In medium sized towns? Sure, occasionally. In (((Frankfurt))) I have seen White/Jewish women pushing around niglets in strollers - strangely a father was not in sight even once…

On the other hand, in my wealthy, small town I have yet to see race-mixing at all.

I don't care if you are a genuine defeatist or a sinister cuck shill. I'll give you my honest opinion: Any woman dumb enough to fall for race mixing propaganda or to have such low self esteem she would let a nigger touch her is a liability and it's good if she signals than openly. If she removes her failed genetic code from the White pool this is a net gain for those who appreciate being White and wish to remain so. We were able to drag these failures along when our nations were all White, but they probably fucked around and cucked their husbands even then, creating misery wherever they were enabled. Good fucking riddance.

Trying to prevent people from race-mixing is a mistake. See this global chaos as an opportunity to cleanse the White race of all the traitors. That's been our problem for so long, Whites lacking in-group loyalty. It's not ALL the Jews. The Jews are exploiting a genuine weakness in our group. White cuck behaviour goes as far back as our grandparent generation sending money to fund MORE NIGGERS in Africa because some ChristCUCK priest told them sob stories about his nigger pets. Charity of this kind still continues to this day, in Churches and outside of them. Our own ancestors helped create these problems we face today. They were naive and we are paying the price.

Letting sluts be sluts and letting race-mixers race-mix is part of the solution, not part of the problem. Avoid both types, only associate yourself with good people. The dysfunctional ones will drop to the level of whatever strain they mix with, the sluts will end up childless thanks to contraception and our population will go through a bottleneck, losing out on the raw production capacity these two dysfunctional types of women represent. But we will come out stronger on the other side, in the long-term. Cleansed of the genetic dysfunctions that are treason and naivety, we will be Jew-wise, never relax around Blacks and have a stronger in-group preference. Thanks to contraception and muh female career, only the ones who desire to reproduce will reproduce (rather than in the past: whoever wan sum fugg and sucks at pulling out). Our current troubles are growing pains. We will emerge greater than ever before.

If you don't believe this you might as well kill yourself now. Get it over with.

I haven't seen anything, post some tweets?


This: he says that this faggotry is what we'll be remembered for.
We have to unfuck ourselves. He's right about that.

I do wish that it didn't come off as so deracinated at times and I hate the rap he has at the end of his videos.


One of his first episodes they're referred to as 'oven worthy aspects of society'

Wow, a small town. How relevant.

Meanwhile, 80% of the US population lives in urban areas.

Wow, the USA. How relevant.

Meanwhile, over 90% of the world population live outside of the USA.

We were talking about the USA, dumbass.

Not wanting to burst your bubble, but Vikings proudly had culture of looting other more advanced cultures that were weaker in battle. No necessarily "offensive", the Mongols under the Khan were the same.

Fighting prowess =/= civilization advancement.

The level of civilization only started to affect fighting prowess more directly when gunpowder weapons became excedingly refined and effective so to speak. Even Ancient Greece had Sparta as one of its City States that specialized in Warfare, so the rest could Philosophize and Trade.

Just the kind of arguments I would expect to see in a ecleb thread.

I wasn't, I named (((Frankfurt))) so it should be obvious that I'm not American. I thought we were talking about race. Race doesn't know nationality. European genes remain European when you move to America. And with Europe being flooded with non-Whites now I don't see how there could be a fundamental difference between Europe and North America in this matter.

I had a dream Sam was the democratic nominee