The Overton Window Is Shifting In Our Favor

Iron Ann Coulter was on Bill Maher and the topic of Trump comes up. Along with Ann on the panel are an absolutely brain dead, virtue signaling libtard and moderately intelligent, 'right half the time' lolbertarian.

Part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=86-gOJP8P50

Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=GSJXJfcvVsE

(Someone Webm these please and thankyou)

You can tell from these exchanges the leftist audience doesn't know how to respond to the topics of immigration, Trump's popularity, or Hillary's terrible candidacy.

These people used to laugh at Ann's every sentence a few years ago, they aren't laughing so much now I'll tell ya!

Discuss.

Other urls found in this thread:

whosdatedwho.com/dating/ann-coulter
twitter.com/AnonBabble

bum

Ann's hair is unreal! I mean… is it real? How old is she? How many women her age have hair like that?

p

She buys it from the same place Donald Trump gets his, lol.

How many young women have hair like that?

100% of the women who care enough to have hair like that.
Most women do the minimum to get fucked.

Nevermind that, when did she become a spooky scary skeleton?

She was a babe when she was younger.

No different from an e-celeb thread.

Shit thread.

...

You have a problem, user

Well I think she's still very beautiful. More defined features now, although it's aided by a ton of makeup, wonder what she looks like without it.

...

Nope. They virtue signal just as much, if not more than libtards. They do it to appear right.

Nope. They virtue signal just as much, if not more than libtards. They do it to appear right.

Was a good watch. You can tell that the libfaggot can't imagine a universe where crooked hillary doesn't get elected, can't handle the facts of the situation, and the fuse trips everytime Iron Ann makes a point. They're basically floundering but none of them want to admit it.

"And by the way, I wasn't as much of a little bitch as George Will is being!"

*Falls out of chair*

How is she an "e-celeb" when she's an important paleocon figure and is surely going to be a member of the Trump administration?

Couldn't make it past about 7 minutes of part 1.

While Ann says some awesome shit she doesn't defend conservatism.

She keeps defending republicanism. They aren't equal. Republicanism is the co-opted and 100% liberal part of the conservative base.

I left when they started on Trump being bad for the economy and she missed a chance for;

...

conservative is free trade. that's why the principled conservatives are anti-trump. conservatism can go into the garbage as well

She treats being a Republican as supporting the sort of conservatism most of us can be behind.

There are pretty much a hundred different rebuttals that could be used for any dumbass thing the others were saying, so I can't see any reason to fault Ann just because she chose different points to lay down.

I hate these lying cunts, and of course they make it 5 vs 1.

...

Filtered.

we're fair trade, not free trade kike

Yes. Republicans are that. Conservatives are not. They're mutually exclusive. Conservatives are not republicans, conservatives are not cuckservatives.

The party [conservative] and name is dying because of retarded cucks like yourself who can't tell the difference.

100 years ago if someone who was considered extremely liberal was transported to the now, he would be considered extreme, fringe, neonazi, "alt-right" [sic] today.

That's how much the Overton window has shifted.

stupid fuckin media hacks.

they gave this bitch a show on msnbc because obviously she's so smart.

"Conservatism" isn't anything worth defending either

...

are we supposed to faggots like this serious?

What's he wearing it for?

Dan Savage is such a disgusting faggot.

Baby steps anons. Today trump, tomorrow the fourth Reich, and through careful brute forcing of public opinion, glorious Hitler will be reborn through the power of the internet to destroy the Jew once and for all.


We are technically speaking, a God.

liberty

We're supposed to. And before Trump smashed the overton window, we would have.
Not anymore. Now he's just another fringe faggot who needs to shut his cockhole.

We still have alot of work to do in expanding it.

The progressive talking points, and buzzwords are jumping the shark, and it doesn't look like anyone is clever enough to come up with anything new. Even Ben "Santorum" Savage looks to be having a hard time adjusting his rhetoric to fully address the new reality.

It's such a fucking cartoonish opinion. Also as someone pointed out in the comments, which I Ann had called him on, is that he first called 11 million Republican primary voters racists, sexists and rubes. Then a few minutes later made the case that 11 million illegal immigrants from drug cartel ridden, former Communist Mexico are more hard working and more law abiding citizens than native born Americans.

That shit ain't going to fly anymore

It's hilarious. Sometimes I have to pinch myself when I remember that these people actually exist.

I wonder, when they are being executed will they understand?

Or will it take the bullets slamming home to convince them?

That's exactly it my friend! Adujusting their rhetoric! I'm 21, I got into 'politics' through watching Jon Stewart and Bill Maher a few few years ago, so i was a typical libtard. And it's the exact same rhetoric, except it just doesn't fit Trump and new right at all. They're views are quickly becoming relics.

Better late than never.

But the only thing that I don't like is many newcomers are not hardened
You would balk at actually killing undesirable people.

Have you ever killed anyone, user?

Here.

I drew you faggots a picture.

Correct.

Nice trips but I'm pretty sure we're a bit further.

Satan that map doesn't make any sense. Why do a lot of you insist on calling yourself National SOCIALIST and claim to be right wing. The Nazi's were not right wing in any sense of the word, they were on the spectrum of Socialism along with Communism.

Left and Right don't mean fuck all anymore it seems.

If we got further at all it would be a flood. By the time you are allowed open discussion on race, everything is on the table. It's a weak points of building up your oppression strategy so strongly, it's brittle. The Overton window theory only holds so far until it looks more like house of Cards/ straw on the camels back.

True, we need to keep pushing.

Sorry meant to say, allowed discussion on race * or anything else *. Any one topic if discussed fully and openly in a oppressed society leads the wave, breaks the dam soon after.

To the left?

Nah. I think there's a natural slowdown from a "democracy" to communism. I think this election with Trump in particular having at least stabilized before communist.

Though I would like critiques on the layout. I think maybe a bit of space on the end of the left side and communism needs to be made and have that be anarchism.

...

I think nignogs will help. Every time they riot it becomes socially acceptable for more people to talk about race. The Baltimore riots saw #dindunuffin and #chimpout, it was probably better than Trump in that sense.

One or two more huge riots could be catastrophic for the official narrative, a flaw in the design of the jew plan.

They let too many nigs into positions of police lower, who will step back like that Baltimore negress. It will cost them.

Castle doctrine is great.
Castle doctrine is great.

Castle doctrine is life.
Castle doctrine is love.

you're a moron. are you from iron march?

Believe me, we know.

Nice ad hom /leftycuck/


What's that?

They wont understand, ever. Even as they're struggling to breath with a rope around their necks they'll still be detached from reality.

This.

Utterly vacuous, virtue-signalling cunt.

That's what happens when you age, genius. You usually hit the extremes and either get fat and sloppy, or you get very skinny. As you get older your muscle mass declines at a faster rate.

Dan Savage and Maher have absolutely nothing to contribute. It's all lame jokes, pivots, and name calling. Ann kept slamming them with facts and reason, and their immediate response is a childish joke or "no u". Actual discourse is constantly derailed, never getting past one or two exchanges before some shitty one liner is spouted and the point abandoned or drowned in moronic cheers from the audience.

Mahers ridiculous, lazy pandering to his audience of retards is beginning to make this show unwatchable though. I have a feeling if the camera ever panned around to the audience, it would be nothing but a few dozen trained seals, clapping their flippers together every time Mehar makes a stale Trump joke and smugs.

I just can't take any pleasure in eradicating them with meme magic if they aren't broken first.

Surely we can crush their moral somehow.

I'm not him but I'm kinda similar, grown up in left/progressive hellhole of california. I wouldn't balk at that at all.

You have to break out of the leftist brainwashing, which is not easy.

Socialism is retarded and for babies who want to soften up their people. If you want your shittiest citizens (who contribute nothing) to thrive and reproduce at the expense of the people who do stuff, it's a great system! (Sound left wing to me!)

Look, if you have a country of degenerates, they are going to find a way to leverage this massive socialist power you give the government, to give free stuff to themselves. It is the nature of government, how corruption happens. National socialism will devolve into shit status like any other big government retardation.

Keep your sense of nationalism, and closed borders, and your white pride, but we need limitations on government power. And we need free markets so the strongest come out on top. We dont want idiot R-selected rabbits coming out on top, even if they are white people.

He was so condescending and up himself. I would happily hand him over to ISIS for a cordless bungee jump

...

As a paleocon she means the old school definition of Republicans as protectionist and anti-interventionist. Not to mention the concept of "small r" republican values of small federal government offset by stronger states' rights.

So why not call it conservative?

The name and ideology of "republican" has been co-opted and shifted so far left it's indistinguishable from liberal.

So why not call it conservative?

The name and ideology of "republican" has been co-opted and shifted so far left it's indistinguishable from democrat.

We need to recapture the meaning of the word, besides whether the cucks like it or not, Trump is the standard bearer of the Republican party now.

Do you think even "true conservatives" understand isolationism IS a conservative belief? Closed borders too.

The thing I've never understood is why people are all "TRADE WAR!!! THE VALUE OF THE DOLLAR!!!"

Who cares? Those are irrelevant if we go isolation mode.

The US is uniquely "privileged" land in that the US can sustain itself completely. We don't need anyone else.

go fuck some fatty fuck face, Holla Forums likes their women fit.

Yes, that’s why they would be called true conservatives.

I like my women under 60, speak for yourself

>

Not even their ghost looking down on the mess will understand.

Goddamnit I love Iron Ann so much.

I'd still fuck her.

No. Political Correctness is structured like one of those Russian dolls, each layer bigger and more absurd than the previous, encompassing and protecting the original ones.

Talking about race isn't the smallest, most protected, most important.

Talking about jews is.

It might qualify it but its still left-wing. Though there's nothing wrong with that in my opinion. We need something close to it coupled with a form of toy capitalism to counteract growing automation as we start to enter a post-scarcity world.

Just gas yourself now so we don't have to waste our time you stupid kike

the part about this that bothers me is that you know liberal faggots like this pretend that nigger data is the same as a direct comparison to the white population

Didn't you record the end where Bill reads the new rules?

Underrated post

I'm not defending or condemning anything Ann said, because I haven't had a chance to see the footage yet, but I'm done ceding words to Cultural Marxists and Globalists.

This is an Orwellian Newspeak War, and I'm done giving up ground because they poisoned a few wells. We need to take back Republican AND Democrat, so they have to struggle to find something to refer to themselves as. We need to take back racist and make it mean race realism, and we need to make sexist a laughing stock by overassociating it with social justice and feminism.

We need to drag Democracy through the mud, using the Founding Fathers as our ammunition, until anybody who wants anything besides a Republic is seen as an idiot.

Fuck this defeatist fleeing. Not only are we the Right, but we're the Alt-Right too. Fuck Milo, both those words belong to us.

You can play this game using multiple paths. That Ann chooses to use a different path than you want her to does not mean she is not winning.

No kids, stays fit, not a pill popper or a drunk… Lives in LA or NYC so less sun (LA you don't walk around unless you're young or Mexican).

Because the word 'conservative' has been coopted and shifted so far its indistinguishable from globalist.

a pussy massage of the highest quality.

This is actually watchable if you fast forward whenever the other guests are talking.

Boy you guys are really letting Leftists dominate Twitter and Youtube lately. These fucking comments.

When Mahr tried to balance his audience with less liberals he got fired of it because they didn't cheer every time he was dead wrong yet interrupting everyone

And yet another thinly veiled Trump thread so as to circumvent the rule of no duplicate threads.

Ann Coulter is a coal burner.

There's no evidence for that, only rumors.

Can't Stump, Won't Stump, Can't Sage, Won't Sage.

Note how the paid audience laughed at everything she said to skew public perception. Kike manipulation at its finest.

The problem with parasites at this level of power though, is that they can get too big and kill the host. That is what's happening to America.

...

>>>/oven/

Yeah, fine, but she's only wankermutt trash anyway.

Define wankermutt please.

...

...

Checked, and understood.

had to close the video immediately he opened his cum drenched mouth

As it is written

cocaine is a helluva drug


pick one

republican =! Republican

retard

Nah

...

conservative is the idea of maintaining the current values and traditions for the sake of social order and cohesion. It is the ideology you hold when current societal values are at its strongest and least degenerate.

The conservatives have lost in their charge to maintain those traditions (granted it was lost from the hostile takeover by the cultural marxists), and our current societal system is degenerating into oblivion. When your society is this far down, what is there exactly left to "conserve"?

That battle was lost, we need to engage in a new battle that is on our terms. This is where radical right/reactionary comes in. This is where we are as it stands.

Donald revealed his hair wasn't a hairpiece or a combover at recent rally, actually.

He's been proving his hair is real for fucking years on end, on countless TV shows.

How embarrassing >>>/reddit/

whosdatedwho.com/dating/ann-coulter

FUCK

Not to blow up Donald's spot, but he clearly uses spirit gum to fake a hairline when he wants to show one off. It's a combover, and it's spectacular.

This, looks kinda angelical even, especially when contrasting with the filthy, filthy satanic crypto-jew next to her.

libertarians need to be gassed along with leftists

Conservatives deserve to die a slow, painful death. There is nothing left worth fighting for with modern cuckservatism.

WebM part 1.

WebM part 2.

Dur dur duuurrr

but I don't like leftists

Right. I'm a pansexual genderfluid ferret trapped in a man's body.

I'd still be her knight errant tbh fam
GIMME DAT MILK

He lifted the entire front and parted the middle…

when will they learn?

I still don't think we should gas lolbergs. Would be nice if we could cryogenically freeze them for a decade or two until we have a bro-tier high-trust society again tho.

Well hopefully the demoralization shill and suspected lizard person known as Nate Silver can be the first. Can't repost image, see link below:

...

She was in a couple with Mayer according to this shitty site.

I'm not a burger, it is well know stuff here?

Watching that was fucking horrific.
That audience…"Weeeeeew!" over the most idiotic shit. The degenerates having to talk over Ann every time she starts saying shit that actually makes sense.
And the usual shit about how everyone who isn't an enlightened borderless liberal faggot who hates their own country must be retarded.

I hope these people renounce their citizenship when Trump takes the throne.

...

Browsing by this thread I thought it was going to be a German insulting the Americans, but no, it's your own people.

How far you've fallen.

How can that horrible sodomite call himself a Catholic? I lament everyday that passes after Vatican II.

Most could, but for some reason they cut it short at some point.

This has also caused me many uncomofortable boners here in Finland where so many formerly fine ladies keep their nice hair the same, long and sexy, then turn around and they're fugly skeletonite 70 year olds.

right.

The only thing I want from Trump is to publicly execute John Oliver.

The same way the Pharisee's could claim they were serving God while THEY FUCKING KNEW they were crucifying him.

I recognize that look.

National Socialism is explicitly socially Darwinian. Libertarianism is not, and "free markets" are entirely about the government using its' monopoly on violence to prop up merchant morality.

If you were actually advocating that the limits on government power extended to the government having no say on property rights, contract law, et cetera you might have a point because that would be purely Darwinian as anyone who wants to own property would have to have a direct and personal ability to defend it militarily without this gigantic, overweening State apparatus that spends vast fortunes on preventing people stronger than you from simply taking what you have. The entire "free market" narrative is built on a eugenic scheme to promote those with a Merchant morality over every other type that are all valuable facets of any society. "Free markets" de facto subsidize the Shopkeeper Morality of Adam Smith, who are almost to a man these nebbish nerds who are the types that cried to their mommy or teacher to punish the bullies, not realizing or caring the vital role that "bullies" play in the social order out of ignorance or selfishness (the actual traits we are talking about among the "k-selected"). They do the same thing with courts and police as adults and assume some kind of "right" to be left alone to their person and property without any associated duty to actually defend either, and then push this morality that it is everyone else's responsibility to ensure these rights for him. It's the "Just don't rape" argument of Slutwalkers.

National Socialism is a warrior ethos and actually engendered a sense of familial belonging among Germans. Frankly if you are against "Socialism" as a concept then you can just extend that to its' logical end and be against the Family Unit itself as it is an inherently socialist entity, not built upon individualist competition as a mode of organization. The very ability to perpetuate a collective at all is "socialism". The notion that National Socialism is any brand of ideology that is Marxist, or even universalist or is bent on promoting the indolent and parasitic over the strong is absurd, and wantonly so. You know what you are saying is not true, and are just hoping it becomes a meme that people internalize and repeat without even thinking about it.

It's propaganda from the kind of nebbish weakling that "just wants to be left alone" but would never actually accumulate enough power to ensure that outcome and instead wants to push his morality which amounts to a psychological neutering of the rest of the population from even being able to consider self or mutual gain outside of a gamefied system of currency accumulation which is probably working against their strengths and their interests both collective and individually.

"Free markets" are a eugenic scheme in which the end result is an abundance of effete, liberal faggots who have freed themselves from the people who should rightfully be in charge who take stewardship over the national family and puts all of the selfish nerds to productive work at swordpoint. Of course every other civilization on the planet still has all of their nascent Warrior-Aristocrats and those will just be the ones in charge of our civilization.

...

how do you figure?

Socialism is about government redistribution of wealth, not every group of people cooperating towards common goals is socialist. Or if you defined socialism in that way, almost everyone would be a socialist.

Your definition means government is inherently Socialist and the holder of any ideology or worldview that incorporates the existence of governments are Socialists.

So how is my definition less exclusive than yours? My definition basically only excludes Anarchists from being Socialists as more or less only they preclude any smaller collectives like families. Your definition only excludes Anarchists as only they believe in the non-existence of a tax collecting government.

In point of fact Socialism as a philosophy is just a group of people cooperating towards a common goal, which in point of fact Free Marketeers do actually oppose on the grounds that it is "collectivism". The logical endpoint of the person I'm rebutting is precisely this radical leftism because he's got the incoherent, hypocritical view that you can have an inherently anti-liberal premise as a foundation (nation, race, family) but still hold onto Liberalism's myriad labels and use it's moral philosophy to underpin your arguments.

If National Socialism is "Socialist" so are both the Family Unit and all governments ever. The Liberal philosophical argument that National Socialism is illegitimate because it is "collectivist" also extends to the Family Unit (and again, many various stripes of Liberal actually do and have made this argument and it is 100% ideologically consistent). If the argument is that National Socialism is "Socialist" because of "wealth redistribution" then so is every other government, and every holder of any ideology or worldview that incorporates the existence of a government.

Ultimately if this is your criticism you aren't actually opposed to Marxist Socialism, globalism, universalist moral philosophy, et cetera on any other grounds except that they are Non-Liberal (ie not left-wing enough, or left-wing in the wrong way) then you aren't right-wing. You are just a Leftist punching Right and playing this American semantic game where you live in a country that was the 18th century version of the Soviet Union and so all "conservatism" is about the conservation of a radical left-wing ideology and "conservatism" is "right-wing". American conservatism is an ideology of the far left. America's founding fathers that weren't far left have been defamed and their views hidden from the public and absolute pariah Jacobins among them elevated into the sole voices dictating America's future history. Jefferson was dead wrong about everything he ever predicted and all of his critics were right about everything. The never-had-a-real-job leftist oil driller was left-wing then, and his ideas are still left-wing now.

Russia has "conservative" Stalinists as well. They call themselves "conservative". Is Communism right-wing too? Has time transmuted Communism to a "right-wing" ideology like American's Liberalism?

Alternatively any system that incorporates any sense of private ownership or private trading in any capacity would be considered inherently capitalist. That includes every single type of system excluding pure Communism. What you are left with is realizing that anything between pure capitalism (Voluntarism) and pure 'socialism' (Communism) are mixed markets of varying degrees. That is really the only way to make these distinctions concretely if one is arguing definitions. When people argue these two elements, most arguing based on a spectrum, and whether going one way is better than the other.


With a vague definition like that, charity, companies, groups of people trading amongst each other other (almost like capitalism or something), and any activity you can think of where people interact with each other. This has little to do with how actual socialist systems work. Socialists systems are always wealth distribution in the name egalitarianism, democracy, and other leftist virtues.

It would be easier to just admit that National Socialism has nothing to actual do with socialism and has everything to do with Tribalism; something is much more agreeable and workable with actual governing systems. Trying to argue socialism is anything outside the leftist paradigm it was spawned from is a waste. Same thing with capitalism, as the term was coined by socialists initially.

No, you fucking faggot.

You say, “There are persons who have no money,” and you turn to the law. But the law is not a breast that fills itself with milk. Nor are the lacteal veins of the law supplied with milk from a source outside the society. Nothing can enter the public treasury for the benefit of one citizen or class unless other citizens or classes have been forced to send it in. If every person draws from the treasury the amount he has put in it, it is true that the law then plunders nobody. But this procedure does nothing for the persons who have no money. It does not promote equality of income. The law can be an instrument of equalization only as it takes from some persons and gives it to other persons. When the law does this, it is an instrument of plunder.
– Frederic Bastiat

No, you fucking faggot.

You say, “There are persons who have no money,” and you turn to the law. But the law is not a breast that fills itself with milk. Nor are the lacteal veins of the law supplied with milk from a source outside the society. Nothing can enter the public treasury for the benefit of one citizen or class unless other citizens or classes have been forced to send it in. If every person draws from the treasury the amount he has put in it, it is true that the law then plunders nobody. But this procedure does nothing for the persons who have no money. It does not promote equality of income. The law can be an instrument of equalization only as it takes from some persons and gives it to other persons. When the law does this, it is an instrument of plunder.
– Frederic Bastiat

Ever heard of hair dye?

Blondes genetically have thicker hair than brunettes.

Just take a minute Holla Forums and consider what the faggot was saying, because these are going to be what is regurgitated from this point on by leftists and antifa until the election.

kek, their best defense for hillary is "reagan would've done the same"


the dissonance is off the fucking charts

...

the only thing off the charts is the hip-to-waist ratio of that woman. gad daym mane.

kill all non-trumps

Bullshit. Social Darwinism is open borders, free trade, etc that puts a nation's working people in a darwinian struggle for existence.

National Socialism is another word for "fascism" which is another word for national republicanism, which is what the United States was founded on. While many of the original principles were based on classical liberalism, all were couched in terms that applied only to white people, with a strong component of protectionism and other polices that were of purely national interest.

this

Fuck your get, Limey.
The sooner your Island sinks into the North Sea from the weight of all those fucking Pakis, the better.

CHECKED
Did you know that if you add all those numbers together and divide them by 3, they would divide by 3?

5 v 1

Iron Ann holds her own

This is why we call her Iron Ann

Did you hear that crowd when she mentioned politicians doing what wall street wants in opposition to the people? Absolute silence. There is no point she could have made to win that crowd. The Liberal elite, and their supporters are now the corporate whores of the US.

Absolutely, you could hear their collective thoughts swirling throughout the room when she said that 'Wa-wait, we agree with that, right? But SHE'S A DISGUSTING REPUBLICAN, I CAN'T CLAP AT THAT!'

The Overton Window isn't really shifting at all. What's happening is that Whites have realized they cannot vote in their own self-interest and are having a hard time coming to grips with it because it's hitting them like a ton of bricks that every White Nationalist they laughed at back in the 80s and 90s is correct and they waited too long to do anything about.

You aren't watching the push back, you're watching the kill shot.

Actually, in a Race Wars podcast episode, Ann Coulter said she was dating Bill Maher.

protip: the church hierarchy is a "progress of dogmas" from what jesus wanted

...

defeatist nihilist spotted. if everything is so hopeless please help us all out and kill yourself. you probably are a manwhore or porn addict on top of being a useless demoralizing cunt – literally the cancer destroying our world. Just die.

Abloo-bloo-bloo. Kill yourself.

Get this smut off of Holla Forums.

When I say I'm against national-socialism, I'm against a lot of the economic policies the Germans implemented. I'm not talking about the cultural impact it had, which you could argue was good.

For one, they implemented many price controls. It's just obvious that the naturally occurring price system is the most efficient way for your society to allocate resources. If you modify it, you get shortages cause the right amount of incentive is not being provided. I am against pretty much all price controls for non-degenerate goods. I don't see why we'd disagree on this, I mean, for stuff like electricity or gasoline, don't you want our people to have them as cheaply and efficiently as possible?

The German government also tried to be the bastion of new technology. I'm against the government deciding how to invest a countries money. I think this process is notoriously corruptible and you end up with a bunch of faggots building shitty solar panels at the tax payers expense all begging the government for a piece of the pie. The only people investing in new technologies should be entrepreneurs, and they should be allowed to keep most of the wealth they generate. It's gotta be high reward to incentivize the high risk.

Price controls and economic retardation like that are basically how I define socialism. Top down economics. It has nothing to do with who's a warrior or what you're talking about, which really are superficial aspects, we can also be a proud nation of free-market participators. We aren't discussing Nietzsche here, we are talking about the practical effects of incentive systems on our countries prosperity. And socialist ideas like the ones I just described ruin economic prosperity. Just keep a free market, closed borders, some policies against degeneracy-peddling and we'll be good.

...

The videos were removed! I wonder why.

I think the channel uploaded them was called Buzzing or something. Did they get the shits when they saw people in the comments siding with Coulter?

sage goes into every field

It's never been confirmed her dating anybody so they make a lot of stuff up. She seems to just be celibate.