You've done a mans job!

What did he mean by this?
Did he mean he didn't expect a replicant like Deckard to do Policework?

Also what do you think of the theory that Deckard is impanted with Gaff memories which is why Gaff seemingly knows exactly what Deckard thinks all the time, also Unicorn.

who cares?

i do

no one then.

HE SHAY YOU BRADE RUNNAR

Blade Runner: Reddit's favorite movie, after The Thing.

...

Killing.

Watch the deleted scenes, Deckard isn't a replicant. As for he line I think it might be there to contrast how human the replicants were and how inhuman Deckard had become. Being a one man slaughterhouse is his job.

He was just congratulating Deckard. Kind of acknowledging that the ol' blade runner had done something really difficult.

The story becomes fucking stupid if he's a replicant. If he's Human it has nothing but deep meanings.

It would be entirely fitting with a Phillip K. Dick story though.
Becoming unsure of your own humanity and perception of reality is kind of Dicks thing.

Being a drug addled addict who wrote entertaining nonsense with the illusion of depth was Dicks thing.

Shut the fuck up, faggot.

you take that back

The line following in the deleted scene was something like: 'But are you sure you are a man? It's getting hard to tell who's who around here'

How exactly can you be a non-drug addled addict?

Isn't the point of the movie that it doesn't really matter?

Exactly
Anybody who says that Deckard must be human in order for the story to work is retarded and missed the point.

THANK YOU

Maintenance user. Your tolerance has grown so high that you can only function normally and without withdrawals on small maintenance doses throughout the day.

That's still being drug-addled. You're still using the drugs, even if you don't get 'high' off them

Addled is defined as a state of confusion. You're truly drug addled when you're jerking off on the bus talking about the radio computer god.

What if you only take stimulants?

Tell him I'm eating

You people are as bad as Ridley Scott and Damon Lindelof. Of course it matters. Writing a story that makes sense is the most important thing.

If Deckard is a replicant, then he is the weakest replicant ever made. Priss was a prostitute replicant and even she kicked his ass. Why would the government make a replicant hunting replicant that is weaker than his targets? What model “replicant” was he? The Nexus 6s are dying of old age. Would “replicant” Deckard be a Nexus 7? If he’s a replicant, then why does he have an apartment? Why does the police chief have to convince him to take the case? Were all the police secret replicants? Whyyyyyyyyy?

I think you have missed the point.

The point of the movie is that emotional response and emotional control is the difference between Replicants and humanity. Replicants are like children. They develop their own emotional responses over time but they don't know how to regulate these responses. Then there's Rachael, who has implanted memories and can therefore control her emotions and if emotional control is the difference between Replicants and humanity and there are Replicants who can control their emotions, then what is the difference?

Without Deckard as a standard by which to measure humanity, it makes no fucking sense. The whole movie would be just about a bunch of different type of Replicants, some who act like children and some who have grown up.

But Ridley Scott says you and everyone else involved with Brade Runna is wrong.


The final secret of the film is everyone is a Replicant and the Earth was sterilized long ago

The real question is, why was this guy speaking ching-chong the whole movie and only realized at the end that he could speak english?

That's city speak. It's a hodge podge of Japanese, Hungarian and a whole bunch of other shit
1)He could always speak English.
2)His speech at the end was plot important dialogue

The movie was about Gaff, why are you all talking about Deckard?

But Deckard clearly couldn't understand "city speak", but Gaff speaks it anyway instead of just using english.

Watch the Theatrical cut

it's a visual movie.

This. The story and the puddle deep philosophical question exist so you don't feel stupid watching a movie for its mood and visuals.

All movies are visual, dumbass

...

Ridley Scott is such a fucking hack. Lucas-tier tbh.

Genius tier hack then?

Great insight m8

He's pretending to be retarded to piss the cops off. End of the scene when Gaff mentions Bryant, Deck drops the act since it's real shit when the boss gets involved.

You mean he only makes pure kino?

Stimulants are exactly what causes that shit you stupid fuck

It's almost impossible to get a psychotic break on any drug unless you take stims with it or take it in fuckhuge doses

The unicorn doesn't mean it's a fact that Deckard is a replicant. Pay attention to the origami, Gaff uses it to make fun of Deckard:
Gaff makes a little chicken.
Gaff makes a tiny man with a boner.
Assuming Deckard told him about his unicorn dreams, Gaff made the final one to point out he's being incredibly naive; he's saying that Deckard is dreaming of something he can never have.

Also Scott said in an interview that he hinted at the replicant theme simply because anti-heroes turning into the very villains they hunt is a common detective noir trope.

He simply meant "Good job killing that filthy replicant scum". I don't think it was meant to throw doubt in your mind over whether he was a human or not, rather to contrast against him being hunted by a superior being, and the sad moment of Roy dying.
Or some gay bullshit like that.

It was actually a teaser thing for Ridley's next film. Legend.

Wow, some people just really don't get the movie, huh?

Oscar bait type movies, dramas, chickflicks etc are all more reliant on dialogue/story than visuals.

TPM > Prometheus

It's still a visual medium, unlike say radio or even theatre

This tbh