Remember Litghtoller: women and children ONLY...

...

Because children are innocent, you psychopath.

So really, feminists have been disgusting cunts since the very beginning.

What? I understand seeing children as more valuable than adults and I would definitely feel sorry for them but I would never sacrifice my life to save some random kid.
I'd grab one and get on a lifeboat if necessary, but in no case I'd die because some kid needs a seat on the lifeboat.
Fucking hell, how much do they weight anyway? 50-60 lbs at best? Hell I could carry two on my lap no problem. But fuck dying so a spoiled, first-class brat can get his comfy seat.

And it was predicted or caused with 19th-century meme magic.

The difference is that your life will be shorter than the kid's life so its more valuable to save the kid's life because then there is more life to be lived than if you lived.
Assuming you both live until old age if you survive, the kid will survive for 70 or so years or whatever but you will only live for ten or twenty years less than the kid, so therefore the kid has a longer opportunity to contribute to society than you do.

Queen Victoria (God save her soul) didn't call feminists "the most hateful, heathen, and disgusting of beings" for no reason.

Based on what?
Your rhetoric is childish.
In nature, when calamities occur, it's the stronger who survive and they breed, leading to a stronger generation. Chivalry is against nature.
Again, I would never kill a child or lead to a child's death deliberately, but my own safety comes first. If I get the chance to save a kid AFTER I secured my own life then all for the better. But fuck first class or second class pieces of shit telling me what my life is worth.
No way, I decide what my life is worth. Or nature. Not the "laws" (because it ain't written nowhere that women and children come first, in fact Cpt. Smith decided to go that route because he was a British aristocratic motherfucker, and just like all rich Brits he was a cunt) of men.

Well I don't think there were any gay or black males on the Titanic.

Leonardo Dicarprio

Checkmate, athiest

the Italian guy seemed a bit in the closet
remember it was 1912, most faggits wouldnt be too open about it
in WWI faggotry was used as an excuse by generals and leaders to sack commanders they didn't like

...

You've never been around kids and forgot your childhood already, retard.

...

I'd like to see the full article before I use it as outrage porn

you're right, the reason was she was a cunt

No the Titanic was insurance fraud. They built the titanic which wasn't that far different looking from its sister ship the Queen Mary, despite the memes about the Titanic's size.

The Queen Mary was purposefully sunk while disguised as the Titanic, while the real Titanic continued on as the Queen Mary.

There weren't any gay niggers on those boats either.

Everyone on the Titanic believed the hype that it was unsinkable and very few got on the lifeboats before things went tits up. Many of the early lifeboats left with lots of room and women and children first didn't happen as it did in the movie.

I bet some assholes were really throwing women to the sea to save their asses but I don't believe it was more than 20 or 50 max.

It was a big ship

This
Although it is pretty fucking coward to throw away some proportionally indefense child to save yourself.

Why didn't they just shoot the iceberg?

This is a reasonable question.

I wholehearetedly agree with you as a red blooded merkan, but shooting at icebergs is actually really fucking pointless, you can hit those fuckers with nukes and they will barely react, really makesyathink.jpg

from the place that shall not be mentioned:

>Iceberg

EVERY
FUCKING
TIME

Y'all gay.
murdercube.com/files/Exotic Weapons/Poor Man's Ray Gun - David Gunn - Desert Publications.pdf

You don't shoot unarmed targets unless they are black.

You sound like a poorfag nigger, so yes your life isn't worth anything.

of course streloks thought of a way to combat the perfidious iceberg, why did I ever doubt

praise the /k/ube, AVE NEX ALEA

what is this expressions attempting to convey?

Modern day kids most likely will grow up to become pothead millenial wigger sjws, so when I'm on a sinking ship with some random kids, the best i could do is ask him to convert into islam before he die so he could get some virgin pussies after I watch him sank down to the bottom.

If he was in on the scam, why did he died?

According to the video, they planned to sink the Titanic (actually the olympia) and a rescue ship (The California) would rescue everyone in less than 10 minutes.

Unfortunately they gave the wrong coordinates to The California and they ended up sinking before the ship made it to rescue them.

What was the fucking point then?

It was the Carpathia, dumbfuck.

Insurance. Fraud.

The owner of both ships was reimburssed for the value of the ship (which includes compensations for projected business of said craft for x number of years) after its "accident". It is also a fact that the "Titanic's" hull is blown outward where the icebergs supposedly hit it.

It's the Queen Mary that sank. Not the Titanic. The names were just swapped. Queen Mary was older, gets replaced with a newer ship, the "new" ship sinks, while the old ship suddenly becomes new.

There are places that detail quite a bit of this information. Though you probably don't believe anything unless it was spoonfed to you by some kike documentary or textbook.

how could they tell which ones gay and which ones straight?

Some things never change

I actually have footage of the determination process

When calamities hit, the survivors survive. Not the 'strong.'

And communities who ditch their kids will be less successful than ones who keep them alive.

And guess who's got more chances to survive? Yeah, that's right, the strong.

Bull-fucking-shit that's been proven wrong time and time again. Rodents often eat their younglings, lions ditch the cubs and so forth. In fact what you said it's the exact opposite of what usually happens in nature: when shit hits the fan the adults often ditch their offspring in order to survive and breed again.

Unless being big is a liability. Mammals survived the ice age where dinosaurs didn't because they were small and warm-blooded. Dinosaurs were easily stronger.

Humans survive because they work together. A group of ten smart humans who rarely work out has a better chance in the wild than some 'strong'

No. Strong means strong. Survival is more than strength. It's many factors and abilities. The blanket statment 'the strong survive' is worthless.

Way to aim high

Humans don't, and never have.

Reminds me of an old Jew Joke from the '50s.

Not the user you're arguing with, but intelligence and cunning and certain abilities would technically count as "Strong" in this scenario. "Strong" doesn't have to only refer to physical strength. The "Weak" would be those utterly incapable of surviving on their own without assistance or help from others to save them. They are the ones who would perish when calamities hit. The strong would be the ones who survive. So no, the statement "The strong survive" is not worthless.

The fact you even had to write this saddens me. Some people are so fucking stupid that it hurts.

If theft is advantageous to everyone who succeeds at it, and adultery is a good strategy, at least for males, for increasing presence in the gene pool, why do we feel they are wrong?

Because human Civilization > An individuals' niggery. Go fuck yourself, hoop ape.

Meant for

do we?
or does society do a good job at brainwashing us from the start so we don't commit "immoral" or illegal actions?

Aren't you just saying, "Those who survive, survive"?

If anything, women were the primary victims of the Titanic.

On September 10th, 2011, George Carlin "joked" about how it would be hilarious if Osama Bin laden arranged a gigantic terrorist attack on the USA and killed thousands of people.

Proceed.

There were feminists that tried belittling men in their country that were just back on shore leave by accusing them of being cowards. They'd even be harsh on those suffering from PTSD.

Have to keep in mind with that article, that suffragettes were often fiercely anti-men and occasionally even murdered people. They were plain nuts.

You mean… exactly what happened 10 years before he said that?