BTFO

t. assblasted Cruz-missle

anyone who's not an authoritarian faggot like you sees this election that way. there's very little difference between trump and hillary on any political spectrum worth two shits, if you can even take trump's position at his word, he gives different vague statements only after a day or so sometimes.

the only thing trump is good for is playing a big joke on the election system. if you're not into that, and actually want to vote your conscience, voting lolbertarian is probably your best bet.

I'm not a burger, explain this blowup.

JUST Gowan get your shit fucked up.

Gary Johnson supports enslaving Christians. Fuck off, hypocrite.

Rose McGowan is a batshit insane SJW and Scott Baio is a Trump supporter. The cunt mocked Baio saying he has a tiny dick, Baio's wife responded to her saying he has a big dick. Then Baio jumped in and called the cunt out for her hideous plastic surgery face. They're both aging D list actors though, so no one really gives a fuck, it isn't really a "blowup".

Hillary's connected to the deaths of at least 47 people, not even including those who died in Benghazi.

How many deaths is Trump associated with?

Gary Johnson has all the exact same policy positions as Hillary except he wants drugs legalized. He's talked about the "war on women" he wants gun control and open borders, he's pro-abortion. He talks about legalizing weed like it's going to fix the economy despite it already being legal in a bunch of states and doing jack shit for those economies.

Republican National Convention was going on. Baio was at said convention as he endorsed Trump. McGowan's implied anyone there doesn't have a soul. McGowan's been having n SJW meltdown on various social media for over a year now.

Once upon a time she was known for fucking Marilyn Manson, playing goth chicks in a couple movies, and being the chick with the machine gun leg in Planet Terror.

Now she's old and busted, shaved her head and her agency dropped her.

The likely future suicide of Bernie "Gibsmesum" Sanders although loosely.

No, he doesn't.
He said he's not in favor of rolling back any of the gun control that's already there. He might consider more gun control if it's absolutely proven that it would actually keep the hands of criminals. It's basically his way of saying: no, gun control does not work. Basically, you are a fucking retard.
Removing criminal controls from drugs will eliminate criminal cartels that take advantage of the controls.

Basically, you fucking retards don't know what you're talking about. Look at this retard:
You just spout shit you don't understand. The fact that you think Trump and Hillary are any different when it comes to real issues is laughable. They're both war hawks. They're both authoritarians. They're both in favor of the status quo. The only difference is that Trump is appealing to retarded faggots who don't even know that the borders have been secured by surveillance and patrols for years now. Even if you build a fucking wall, they'll ride a boat in, or they'll dig tunnels. The only solution to better border controls is more technology and more border patrols.

That was the weakest defense I've ever seen, and you were so buttmad you saged.

You claim I don't know what I'm talking about, but I listed FIVE of his positions and you only responded to TWO and admitted in a backhanded way I was right on both counts.

Saying he wants to keep the gun control already in place means he's effectively in favor it. Saying he'd ever consider more also means he's in favor it. Most Libertarians are die-hard against gun control, why is their candidate such a complete failure on this issue?

Again: This argument's already been proven complete horse shit like I already said, weed's legal in several states and it hasn't done shit for their economies. Put down the bong and shut the fuck up.

and he calls himself libertarian?

What's it like being fourteen years old these days? Trump and Hillary are about as different as presidential candidates can get. One is a corrupt career politican and the other is an successful businessman who got tired of the constant decline of his nation. If Trump would have been any more anti-establishment than he already is he would have gotten assassinated.

And what has he proposed? You think that Trump is going to overturn Roe v Wade? If so, you are a fucking retard.
"I don't believe the laws regarding guns are effective. We're allowed to bear arms. It's part of a free society."
That's exactly what he's said. Just because he's not going to pick a fight with the legislative and start rolling back controls that are already in place doesn't mean anything.

You are a fucking retard that thinks of the executive like a dictator. Basically, you need to take civics 101, you fucking retard.

Once again: if you think that there's a difference between Trump or Hillary on any substantive issues, you are wrong. They are both in the right-authoritarian corner of the political spectrum. Between him, Clinton, or Obama, there's only a small difference on that scale, just like every other mainstream politician in the last two decades. Fuck off, retard, you have no idea what you are talking about.

That's up to the legislative, not the executive. You can't just go into the executive and start rolling back legislation that's already passed.

No, they're not. There's only a small distance between them on the political spectrum, when it comes to real issues.

You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. They're both the same, just like every other politician for the last two decades.

Trump isn't a politician. Now you won't see any traditionalist, fascist, socialist or non librul capitalist politicians in the US so the only difference there really can be is which interests they put first. Hillary will put the elites and globalist interests first. Trump puts regular joe Americans first at least in his rethoric so he has the support of the white working and middle class. Hillary is all about pseudo-leftist identity politics.

but not being in favor of it means he wouldn't want it to happen regardless

LMFAO

He has the same positions as any other politician for the last two decades, and paid a think tank for his tax policies, same think tank Jeb Bush paid.

If it were up to him, yes. But you can't go into the executive and rollback decades of gun legislation in a term just because people elected a lolbertarian candidate.
You know what he can do? He can scale back executive agencies like the DEA and IRS.

And he can also veto and gun legislation brought in front of him.

You're deflecting, we're talking about your shitty candidate. Are you so completely unable to defend him you have to switch subjects? He's brought up the war on women as a talking point repeatedly. That he believes it's even a thing is bad enough to mean he's not a worthwhile candidate. Period.

You're so full of shit I can smell you from here. Of course it means something. If he said he wasn't for changing the current laws in place against drugs, that would mean he was for keeping them illegal, right? Otherwise every other candidate can claim to be just as pro-drug legalization as him. Stop making excuses you lying sack of shit, if he wouldn't get rid of gun control than he's for it. Period.

Those are insults user, I want arguments. Do you have any of those? No? You can't defend what a complete failure your candidate is and how completely stupid every word you're saying is, can you? This is why your party has become a total joke, fuckwit.

So whats the substantive difference between Hillary and Johnson? They both push feminist bullshit, they both want open borders, they're both in favor of abortion, they're both in favor of gun control.

Those things can't be said of Trump, which makes him a better choice than any other. Just SAYING "You don't know what you're talking about" over and over doesn't make it so you braindead pothead. Again: Put the fucking bong down and come back when you have an actual argument. Or just say "Y-you don't know what you're t-t-talking about!!! You're a r-r-r-RETARD! I don't have to prove shit! It's OBVIOUS!"

Go to Canada, they already have your favorite lolbetarian leader who actually legalized weed.

Or maybe it's worth going into gookland, they have hypocrisy and mental disorder in their blood so you will feel like it's your home, you won't even notice authoritarianism because let's be honest, in reality you don't give a fuck about it.

No, you were the one that brought that up, abortion.
Where? I google "war on women" gary johnson and find nothing, you fucking retard.
You are so fucking stupid that you don't even realize how the DEA works.
He would, he just can't. You have no idea how the executive/legislative/judicial works together because you are a retarded sack of shit.
politicalcompass.org/uselection2016
ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm
Too many to list

You've displayed time and time again that you're a fucking retard who has no idea how the presidency works. You believe the executive to be an authoritarian dictator and suck the dick of candidates that reinforce this belief, because they'd use the unified executive to bypass the legislative and shift our country further in the shitter.

Go back to Holla Forums, you subhuman piece of authoritarian shit. Keep believing that there's any difference between Trump and "muh hillary."

The liberals in canada are also right-authoritarian, you fucking retard. They're not even left on the economic spectrum, they're approaching center. They're certainly not lolbertarians.
Yeah, that's all you authoritarian shits obsess about, because you keep sucking the dick of Trump who's literally no different than Hillary except on your buzzword issues.

...

Keep sucking the dick of Trump, who's no different than Hillary.

It's pretty sad if you actually believe that.

The only real difference is his unpredictable personality. There's no difference between Trump and Hillary. Just like there's no difference between Jeb, Cruz, or any other republican candidate, and Hillary.
They want you to believe there's a huge canyon separating them all, but comparing their positions in aggregate and showing them on a spectrum shows otherwise.

Every other candidate in recent history has benefited from this two-party system, proclaiming that there's a huge difference between the two, when there's not, and pushing inane social issues that should be left up to local legislatures as "divisive issues." Trump loves to push the "illegal alien" button too, because that's what retards want to hear. When the fact is that the border has been secure for years and the population of illegals has leveled off. You're never going to stop people who go so far as to risk their lives by boating into the country, or dig tunnels underneath the border, and you're certainly never going to stop people who overstay their visas (which is what the largest contribution to new illegals now, even with the population leveling off.)

So yes. Basically, you are a fucking retard.

I'm not from Canuckistan but I think Trudeau hasn't legalized weed yet. He sympathized with the brain-dead people so he could have their vote but he forgot about them once he got elected.

...

He hasn't. And of course the liberals would take advantage of stupid people. Because they're right-authoritarian faggots who are no different on the political spectrum than the establishment running our country for the last two decades.
Even if Trump isn't a part of the establishment, because they love to bitch about him, he holds pretty much all of the same positions.
It's a rigged game. There's no difference. The highest level "debates" we have are focusing on "how should we regulate bathrooms" and stupid social issues. Not anything of substance, like operation of the executive, economic issues, and so on.

Yes, I have an issue with his stance on abortion. He's as in favor of it as Hillary.
You're so assmad about getting called out on this. It'll take me a while to find the exact clip, but it was on an interview with John Stossel. That girl with one name who used to be on MTV but now writes for Libertarian mags was on the stage as well (I'm mentioning this because I'm trying to find the specific clip and I'm only finding the one where she isn't there.) Near the end of the interview Gary Johnson says the Republican party is "anti-women" and enacting a war on women. Stossel is a bit taken aback and responds "I don't think the Republican party is anti-women." He even wrote up this article afterwards, but being a Libertarian himself limited who he was criticizing to the Dems: reason.com/archives/2014/03/12/the-war-on-women-myth

He said it, and I'll find the clip. And I'd love to see how you justify it.

Ah, so you're going back to the old "I don't have an argument, so I'll just jump up and down like I'm having an autistic shitfit and pretend saying 'UR DUM!' over and over makes up for it." routine. Him saying he'd keep the laws in place means he's in favor of keeping the fucking laws in place, which means he's pro-gun control. This isn't fucking rocket science.

So his defense is to claim powerlessness. "I can't fight da goverment, I'm just a lil' ol' president!" And you wonder why Libertarians are a fucking joke now. Remember how popular Paul became on the platform he was going to fucking eliminate the IRS?

So you list none? Come on you fucking imbecile, you talk big but you can't back it up with a god damned thing. List ten differences. Ten specific ways that both Hillary and Trump are the same, and Johnson is not only different but better.

Note: I don't want drugs legalized. I don't want prostitution legalized. I'm completely against abortion. Open borders is fucking retarded.

THIS JUST IN, LIBERTARIAN PARTY MEMBER ADMITS DEFEAT, CAN'T NAME SINGLE SPECIFIC DIFFERENCE, CRIES 'AUTHORITARIAN' WHILE ADMITTING HIS CANDIDATE IS POWERLESS AND RESORTS TO CHILDISH INSULTS. STATUS OF DIAPER UNKNOWN, BELIEVED TO BE FULL OF SHIT. TEARS OVERFLOWING AS HE SCREECHES IN AUTISTIC RAGE

That's up to Sanders, I never really liked him other than being a fresh face that was quite different from Trump-Hillary. That's on him to sacrifice his principles and sell out, backing a candidate who's no different than Trump.
He's too far to the left on the economic spectrum for me personally, but certainly a better choice than Trump or Clinton.

ok
when was the last time trump supported terrorists overthrowing governments in the middle east and had people assassinated and covered for a rapist?

You know what's fucking crazy about Trump? He hasn't been unpredictable at all. Everything he's said. Everything he's talked about. His favorite talking points and pet issues. All of that shit is stuff that Trump has talked about for decades now.

He is startlingly consistent.

And? Trump isn't going to be able to overturn Roe v Wade. If states want public funding of abortion, that's up to them. But it shouldn't be funded by the federal government, which is what Johnson's stance is. Otherwise, you're not going to fucking overturn Roe v Wade, jackass.
So it doesn't exist, despite you saying that he was repeating it endlessly everywhere.
No, you're just a fucking retard that doesn't understand that there's a difference between legislation passed by congress and what an executive agency regulates as such.
No, that's just how the government works, and should work. You failed high school civics and/or believe that the expansion of unitary executive theory over the past two decades should continue.
I listed enough, by linking to the spectrum and to all his issues.

When he picked the architect of the Iraq War as a foreign policy adviser.

lol, no
duckduckgo.com/?q=trump inconsistencies

Look, I'm defending Trump in other posts… but you couldn't be more wrong. He's been for and against everything. Gay marriage, abortion, border control, gun control, I can pull up interviews and quotes -in some cases from like A YEAR AGO- where he held all the opposite positions.

Who said anything about Roe v Wade, dipshit? Johnson has consistently stated he's for abortion, so there's no hope of him doing anything to tighten it. He's not going to give any speeches on how morally wrong it is, no executive orders, no bills requiring parental consent, he's as much for abortion on demand as Hillary, and that's disgusting. Would he do anything to defund Planned Parenthood? No, no he wouldn't. So fuck you.

How about this, you're sure I'm making it up, right? I'm going to keep looking, all about youtube. I assure you it's real. How about when I produce it you admit you're wrong and your candidate is complete garbage. Fair enough? I mean, that's not a hard promise to make if you're so sure it's not real.

You're not even a Libertarian, are you? Any libertarian's primary mission is to shrink government. You're just saying "Eh, there's nothing anyone can do! Just accept big government and do what it tells you user! If you think otherwise y-y-you're just fucking retard and don't understand how things work! B-b-bend over or you're retarded!"

Listen here you shit-swilling faggot, you posted two random fucking links. I'm asking for specific policy differences right fucking now. Do you not know of any off the top of your fucking head you fucking disgrace? All this bluster about your candidate and you don't fucking know any differences, do you? I listed a ton of specific ways they're the same, why can't you list any ways they're different? Else I may as well go.

Here, definitive proof libertarians are fucking retarded: www.google.com I just provided all the proof you need!

This, mostly.
Sick of newfags talking about voting as though it mattered. It's really indicative of how many facebook/reddit normalfags have taken over 8ch recently. Clinton is just Reagan VI; Trump is just a joke no one seems to be getting. But the normalfags are SO EXCITED to vote for them, they're really going to change things this time!

I can probably guess which things you mean, and given context and clarification, he holds up far better than Shillary and every other politician who run.

This is a guy who gets tons of "have you stopped beating your wife?" questions lobbed at him every day, in addition to the media constantly misrepresenting his words and intentions. It's hard to know what he's actually saying when so many people are just making up things he said.

You mean the guy who is pro-TPP and has an assload of terrible ideas that even Libertarians want nothing to do with?

...

You're not going to be able to "tighten" it because Roe v Wade. And, not to mention, that's up to the legislative if if came down to it.
Yes, he's stated he would not fund Planned Parenthood abortion services by the federal government. But the fact is that retards like you don't even know what Planned Parenthood does. Even Trump has stated that they do good work. If you weren't a fucking virgin that has never had a kid, or ever known anyone that has a kid, you'd realize that they provide so much support to first time mothers.
lmao, so much for "repeating it endlessly."
Probably didn't say it in the first place. You seem upset.
Yes, but in the executive there's only so much you can do. A libertarian's primary mission is to not act like a dictator and overturn legislation on a whim, which is really big government with no checks or balances, just a dictatorship.
It's saturday morning and I'm not going to get into a substantive comparison, I gave you his issues and you can see the differences on that site. I'm taking issue with your support of a candidate who's no different than Hillary on the political spectrum.

Wrong, he believes trade agreements like that are laden with crony capitalism. He supports free trade, but not when it's in the form of TPP with a bunch of propping up of certain industries and international tribunals. So basically, you don't know what you're talking about.

It's hilarious. They don't realize who they're even voting for. They've taken the Holla Forums memes to heart, they actually believe this shit.

uhhhh like why the bullcrap would anyone even question trump lol, like do people even wtf anymore?

that's exactly what i'd expect from a bernie supporter

There's no rationalization in that post, seeing as I never really supported him, you retarded faggot.
That's his perogative to pathetically debase himself by abandoning his principles.

You don't have any fucking defense here. You just weasel around and repeat that your candidate is a fucking wimp and deny that he could do anything about anything, act as if his stances don't matter because you can't defend them. Obviously if he's not against abortion, he's not likely to nominate a supreme court judge who's against it, is he? I gave you specific examples of things he could do that he wouldn't, and you just handwave it away with "DATS NOT HOW GUBMENT WORK user!! U DUM! HE CAN DO NUTHIN!" Honestly, it's like you're doing this on purpose. Like you're handing me this argument. Like you're trying to look stupid on purpose. Is that what you're doing? It kind of feels like you're sucking my dick, user. Stop that, I'm not into dudes. Stop sucking my dick.

First: Stop sucking my dick. Saying "If you don't agree with me you're a virgin!" isn't an argument, silly. You're making yourself look completely unhinged.

Second: Since you're going there, I'll get personal and demonstrate as you have through this entire thread that you're talking out of your ass. A few years ago I was in that position. I was dating a girl who I believed was pregnant. She took several tests and the results were inconsistent. I suggested going to Planned Parenthood and getting a free test. She balked at the idea, got pretty angry. "They kill babies there, would you get medical treatment for your dog in the room where they gas them at the pound? That's disgusting! I'd sooner burn the place down than get help from them!" So she found a religious alternative (I'm not religious, but she was.) A Christian clinic that offered every service Planned Parenthood does, but doesn't abort babies. No chance of fetuses being kept in jars by creepy sociopaths, no one selling their parts at a profit. Saying they do 'some good' is like saying "I hear Dahmer was a very charming fellow."

So you're backing down from the challenge then, eh? It's taking forever to find the clip, holy fuck is Johnson a fucking bore in every fucking interview. I feel confident I found the right interview, but I can't find a clip with that specific segment. He was on Stossel and he was taking audience questions. Whatever, in the meantime, chew on these:
caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/07/10/gary-johnson-family-leader-pledge-gives-republicans-a-bad-name/
thelibertarianrepublic.com/gary-johnson-mental-health-guns/
thelibertarianrepublic.com/gary-johnson-says-hillary-no-criminal/
thelibertarianrepublic.com/stossel-gary-johnson-doesnt-come-across-as-presidential/
voicesofliberty.com/2016/06/14/the-problem-with-gary-johnson/
canadafreepress.com/article/top-10-reasons-i-will-not-vote-for-gary-johnson-for-president

It seems to me more Libertarians fucking hate him.

Now there's the kind of presidential slogan I've come to expect from Johnson. "Gary Johnson 2016 'There's Only So Much I Can Do"

Not quite the same punch as "Make America Great Again", but then what is?

You can't name one. You're claiming they're different but you can't name a single way. You're so full of shit. I'm going to admit it right now. On one hand I'm laughing, but on the other I'm kind of angry at how pathetically you've defended your candidate here. You come here with all this bluster saying "Hillary and Trump are the same, Johnson is different!" but can't name A SINGLE FUCKING WAY.

YOU made the claim you fucking asshat, now you're admitting you can't back it up. Admitting you were talking straight out of your fucking ass. I provided you a laundry list of policies he shared with Hillary, you either ignored or handwaved away every single one. You've completely avoided the open borders thing.
I know the pot makes you feel smart, but the reality is it makes you DUMB AS ABSOLUTE FUCK.

Lazy fucking stoner.

You heard me, faggot. Within the framework of US politics they are completely different. Naturally the kikes really run the show but you can't vote them away.

The political establishment don't want Trump to win, you just have to follow the money to see what's what. Soros also just donated 25 million to Shillary. Now I am not saying that Trump will make a political revolution happen, simply that he is fighting the establishment. Just look at all the attempts by kike media to attack him in every way they can. Now you can't tell me with a straight face that Trump and Shillary "are the same", they are provably not.

lmao
go back to reddit, kid
You're weaseling around the fact that abortion will always be legal because of Roe v Wade. No one cares about your opinion, christcuck.
No one's sucking your dick, virgin. Even Trump agrees Planned Parenthood does good work.
lmao, couldn't find it.
Wow, who'd have fucking thought?
Better make the morning after pill illegal too, christcuck. Because it produces an abortion after implanation. lmao.
Well, yeah. The government is huge, and he's running for the executive. What he can do is take executive agencies and trim the fat, reduce regulations in that respect.
I already have.
Yeah, an authoritarian shithead will always be able to take reducing government regulations and spin them as something bad. Obviously anyone voting Johnson is all about "muh weed lmao."
Just like anyone voting Trump is all about "muh beaners lmao." What's funny is that everyone knows there's a problem with drug classification, and Trump retards don't realize that the illigeal immigrant population leveled off years ago, in response to border patrols and surveillance.

Also, as for your reddit-tier meme generator shit, Johnson isn't for drone strikes without a proper declaration of war, and is for military due process of detainees and sending them home. His opinion on Guantanamo is that detainees have to go somewhere.

Not only are you a meme generator reddit fag, but you couldn't even shit on Johnson right. His stance on the fed is the real issue with libertarians.

Your asspain is seeping straight through your text. These aren't arguments, user. I know weed effects your memory, but I said right in the post you were replying to I'm not religious. You're trying desperately to focus on me because you've completely and utterly lost this debate. This is the part where you go "LMAO NO I DIDN'T RETARD" and pretend that's a substantive argument.

So again, you're conceding you have no response on supreme court nominees, executive orders, or tightening restrictions? God you just can't argue worth shit, can you? By all means, come back and bend over for another spanking by repeating "MUH ROE V WADE" when you're the only one that brought it up, like a fucking retard because you got fucking owned on this issue and your stupid stoner ass can't come up with a counter to any of it. Repeat yourself like you're fucking retarded, please.

Oh and that was stupid of him to say, no doubt, but he's less enthusiastic about it than Johnson by a longshot. And I gave you a response to that. You couldn't even think of a response you pitiful fuck.

Lolololzers, he still has no response to all the Libertarians speaking out against Johnson's shameful record. Maybe you can show me what's what by ignoring it all again and telling me to go to Reddit. That'll sure make your candidate suck less shit!

Wait, no. No you're still a completely unforgivable fucking idiot who can't put into words one actual difference between Johnson and Hillary and will return to repeat the same playground insults and take another fucking spanking to your stupid stoner ass. Oh, oh, but maybe you can call me a virgin. That'll make up for you inability to answer for Johnson's record, right?

Another concession. God, you're pathetic.

You googled a list of his positions and posted them. I doubt you've even fucking read them. You didn't actually name a specific fucking difference you miserable pothead dipshit.

So no response on open borders? That's okay, maybe next time you can say something about my mom, or tell me you could totally beat me up. That'll prove what a great candidate Johnson is, right? Fuck potheads are stupid. You're a walking, breathing argument to keep it illegal you miserable idiot.

...

Nah, christcuck. No one's raging here. lmao.
I'm having a blast reading your asshurt over the fact that you couldn't find the video containing the thing you were talking about, even though you desperately claimed he repeated it endlessly everywhere.
The courts work on precedent. Good luck with that.
Nah, and I know you're upset over it.
His record is pretty good aside from the fed.
I don't need to name any, and I won't because it's making you pretty asshurt.
He never proposed open borders, he proposed a work program for citizenship afaik.
Yes, you definitely need to go back to reddit, as you are meme generator image posting garbage.
Take your epin memes back to the rage comic subreddit.

Right, you're so not angry you're calling an atheist "christcuck" and randomly tossing on "lmao". You're transparent as fuck, stoner.

You're coming back to this because thus far this is the one single point you haven't been stomped on because I can't find the clip. So, congrats. That would 1 for you, and 10 for me. However, when I do find the clip it's going to be hilarious watching you backpeddle and try to excuse it and explain it away.

Yeah lmao you just retarded + I bet you a virgin lololz.

If you're a fan of Hillary's policies.

He concedes again. We're basically done here. You made a claim, you couldn't back it up, you made an utter fool of your druggie ass, and after getting owned your pathetic recourse it "… I won't prove it's right because… it's upsetting you!" Tell me how winning the argument upsets me you fucking retard.

Obama's amnesty plan. Open borders.

Did I do something they do on reddit? I don't go there, tell me what it was since you're evidently an expert on what goes on there.

...

lmao
Try again
You declared unequivocally that he repeated it endlessly.
No, I'm not, because I actually talk to women and don't make up anecdotes about retarded rednecks who refuse to use an organization that provides medical care to women.
Better not use a pharmacy that sells the morning after pill, either.
That's not open borders, you fucking retard, and it's not Obama's amnesty plan.
Yeah, you posted your meme generator shit. You have to go back.

...

It's my only explanation for you simultaneously being so arrogant yet so stupid and lazy.

He's the single most boring candidate I've ever had to sit through footage of. He just drones on and on sheepishly in interview after interview and I'm watching every clip I can trying to find the right one. What are you going to have to say when I do find it?

I was parodying what you think works as an argument you fucking retard. Trying to claim anyone who isn't for abortion is a virgin? Calling my ex a redneck because she's against abortion? Rephrasing "murdering babies" as "medical care to women"? That's an awful lot of identity politics and doublespeak, but do you have an actual argument anywhere to provide? Kind of looks like you're just buttmad you got your ass handed to you and you can't defend Johnson or your claims at all.

Yes it is, you fucking retard. See? I can "argue" just like you. Just make a declaration, and follow it with an insult. Holy FUCK do you completely suck at arguing. This is how stupid you have to be to want to vote for Gary Johnson, ladies and gentlemen.

And apparently the only place you find those is reddit? Not maybe, google image search?

Every time you try to shift topics from how much Johnson sucks and how completely unable you are to defend him to instead attacking me and making empty declarations, you concede total defeat once again.

The explanation is that I don't really care to use effort arguing politics seriously on a television board. You do, and you justify your choice of Trump when the fact is that there's no difference between Hilary and Trump when it comes to real issues.
I don't particularly care, but the fact is that you said he repeated it endlessly, and yet you can't find it, it speaks volumes because you're an authoritarian dicksucker. I also wouldn't care because he hasn't proposed anything in that line of policy. Nor would he. That's just one man's opinion, has nothing to do with his policies. But he probably didn't say it.
I'm claiming that you're a virgin because it's obvious. And it doesn't matter if an organization of seperate facilities offered abortion services at any point.
Better not use to the pharmacy, they sell morning after pills. Those pills are known to produce abortions after implantation.
No, it's not.
yes. it's time for you go to back to reddit, fedora atheistcuck. lmao.

Excuse for being lazy when you've been repeatedly and soundly defeated in this thread by numerous people from the beginning. Started saging the moment you lost the argument. It's funny how you keep coming back to reply to an argument you don't care about.
State it's a fact, then back it up with nothing. This is the way a liberal dipshit pothead "argues". The fact is you suck cock as often as you can. I said it's a fact, so it must be.

Okay. See image. Here's the part where you move goal posts and say some of them are fat or ugly or something. Holy fuck, potheads are dumb.

It does matter. Look, I just provided the same level of argument as you. You're just making empty statements you hilariously stupid fuck.

Yes, it is.

Keep aiming for 1% Gary, maybe two people will vote for you this time, you aging t-shirt under jacket wearing dweeb.

Been saging from the beginning, except when I closed and re-opened, and forgot. This discussion doesn't belong on Holla Forums.
They're on the same part of the political spectrum, only differentiated by social issues that should be up to local legislatures.
I, too, can find pics of amatuers and edit them in mspaint. That's pretty pathetic brah.
No, it doesn't.
No, it's not.
It's better than voting for an authoritarian dicksucker who represents the same positions as Clinton on anything important. Maybe I will vote for Trump if I'm feeling like playing a joke on the system that day, or maybe I'll vote for my principles. It still doesn't change the fact that you unironically think there's a difference between the two.

Stay salty, fedora atheist trumpcuck. lmao.

What did he mean by this?

Like I said, for as long as you've been losing this argument.

Yet you brought it up and suddenly don't want it when everyone hands you your ass.

You mean Johnson and Hillary, right? I listed policies that were the same between them but different with Trump, you provided nothing, got buttmad, screamed a bunch of playground insults, and then declared you didn't have to answer after getting completely owned.

Hahaha, go ahead and find pics of those girls. I'm the only one on Earth that has the rest of any of those images.

Yes it does.
Yes it is.

This is how shit you are at arguing.

You mean Johnson. Also, you're defining what's "important" as what's important to you, the person who's single defining feature is BEING WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING.

Thing is, I've proven there's a difference between the two. I listed policies. You made statements and insults because you got butmad your candidate sucks and you don't have a fucking clue about his policies.

This is why the libertarian party has become a complete joke, it's full of complete idiots like you who think "No it doesn't retard" is an argument.

that she has to go back to Venezuela

...

...

...

...

b-b-but user, he said mean things once! And he was outed as a terrible racist, xenophobe, and misogynist after he decided to run against the democratic establishment

Also don't you know 4 of his business ventures as an investment filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy? Nevermind that none were liquidated, these are all very bad things!

He also won't visit Israel! G-d knows we do NOT need him in the white house!

No, it was brought up before I even posted. As a response.
There's many more substantive policy difference between Johnson and Hillary. Take NSA for starters, or not being a war hawk. Trump and Hillary are the same, I assure you. You're just too fucking stupid to realize it because "muh beaners lmao." A position he has also flip-flopped on multiple times.
Sure you are. Pathetic, brah.
Who said I was actually attempting to make an argument? I'm calling you a fedora atheist trumpcuck, as you've already admitted youself.

Stay salty, fedora. lmao.

No, he doesn't.

Nice try.

Sticking your fingers in your ears and going "LALALALA" isn't an argument. He says it right in the fucking video you stupid fuck.

Is this supposed to be ironic?
Trump has visited Israel multiple times, and he hangs the Jewish "tree of life" on his wall, next to another Jewish award, as the most prominent part.
He has also stated that he'll go to war for Israel, even if it isn't in retaliation for a direct attack on Israel.
Trump is basically the goodest goyim.

TPP isn't truly free trade. It's crony capitalism and propping up industries.
All lolbertarians are for free trade.

He says he supports free trade, not agreements that legally enforce crony capitalism.

You posted one of those "reddit memes" you love claiming Trump and Hillary were the same. People responded that you were butthurt, and you proved them right by responding with a sage and personal attacks.

Dozens of posts later you're still here providing amusement for us, screeching insults and pretending "NUH-UH" is an argument.

Yet you refused to name any of them.

Trump's not a war hawk.

Johnson and Hillary are the same, I assure you. You're just too fucking stupid to realize it (this is literally how a Johnsonfag 'argues'.)

Prove me wrong. Just accept your latest defeat you laughable fuck.

Well, I'll give you that nothing you've said really qualifies as an argument. It's more just you making yourself look retarded and butthurt over and over and over.

And in that video, he says he supports the TPP.

Without even fucking reading it.

You're wrong, you lost, you're an idiot, nothing you can say or do will change that.

Deal with it.

...

That poster wasn't me
Yes, he is. See Israel stance.
I just named two differences, and there are many more on that website.

Of course not, you just responded on their behalf to the people mocking it for no reason at all.
No he's not.
And I named a ton more. Abortion, feminism, open borders, the TPP, gun control, Johnson fails on every single one of these issues.

My first post in the thread was
The other poster and you need to go back to reddit with your meme generator shit.
His stance on Israel says otherwise
I don't think Johnson has said anything about feminism, and their opinions on it are of no concern when it comes to important issues. Johnson doesn't want "open borders" in the context that you mean. He doesn't want gun control at all. He doesn't support the TPP. You basically don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

A vote for johnson is basically a vote for hillary because he won't win

Which is you replying on some other person's -who apparently disappeared at the same time you appeared?- behalf, and declaring the people mocking them are "authoritarian faggots" in a way that makes absolutely no sense and shows considerable butthurt from someone just entering the thread.

You mean Johnson's?

Alright, I get it now. You're autistic. I'm going to explain something to you. You personally are one person. You have no authority to decide which issues are and are not important simply based on which ones matter to you. Thinking that… makes you a sociopath. I know you're stupid, but you're not a sociopath, right? So really, you should probably drop that "the important issues" asshatery, or at least at the words "to me" to admit you're expressing your opinion and basically saying "I don't care about this because I'm a stupid liberal who wants legal weed."

So you're saying if we change the definition then he's not for open borders? He said he wants to get read of border security and make it as easy to get into the country as possible. That the only reason to monitor the border is drug prohibition and there would be no drug prohibition under him (though conveniently THAT you think he can get done you completely inconsistent, incredibly stupid fuck.) Any way you slice it, that is open borders.

So you were lying when you admitted he stated he'd keep all the current laws in place?

Except for that video where he specifically says he does. You think if you just say you're a billionaire, you'll become rich too?

This is what is known as projecting. You've demonstrated profoundly that not only do you know nothing, but that when confronted with this you'll simply lie and refuse to accept the facts which have proven you wrong.

Johnson sucks, no wonder he's your candidate.

ITT: a samefag argues with himself

As opposed to Trump's stance that he'd start a war even if it isn't a direct attack on Israel's sovereignty.
They are unimportant because they should be left up to states, instead of the federal government.
Well, if the US had closed borders we're basically asking for another great depression, dumbass. There's a thing called imports. And immigrants.
As for "open borders", he doesn't support illegal immigrants flooding from the south, obviously. He does support the immigration policies we have now. And he does support a work program to naturalize those who are already within the country, who are going to stay here no matter what in the shadows.
That's not up to him. It's up to congress, or him working with congress, to repeal the gun legislation up to this point. He wouldn't veto repeal of gun control, if that's what you're asking.
What's up to him is running the executive.
You definitely failed civics 101, kiddo.
He says that he supports free trade. He says that the TPP isn't true free trade, it's crony capitalism that's propping up certain industries.
No one's projecting, fedora atheist.

Sadly I'm not the fedora atheist faggot from reddit that I'm responding to. This is your typical trumpcuck.

...

Which is much the same as Johnson's who said he'd defend them militarily. Another swing and a miss, Johnsonfag.

You mean like drugs and prostitution? The two main planks of Johnson's campaign? You just said his positions weren't important. You don't even know what you're defending you stupid fuck.

So, according to your "logic" Johnson wants to "cause a great depression". You can't even be consistent you stupid fuck, the economy isn't dependent on illegal immigrants, the economy that would be hurt is Mexico because the illegals wouldn't be sending money back anymore.

"Undocumented Democrats" you mean. Fuck off, that's open borders. He specifically said he wants to demilitarize the border and make it as easy to get in as possible. That is definitionally open borders.

The point of all this, you braindead chimp, is that these are all positions he shares with Hillary, but not with Trump. This is why people are choosing Trump over Hillary. The issues don't matter to you (because you're a selfish, self-serving, r-selection autistic) but they matter to most voters, and that's why Johnson's just like Hillary and ain't no one voting for him.

Oh, but changing federal drug laws is? Quit contradicting yourself you fucking idiot.

IT'S RIGHT IN THE FUCKING VIDEO. He's SPECIFICALLY said he supported the TPP. You can't backpeddle on this. He said it. It happened. He's for the TPP. Deal with.

Now, if you truly have autism you'll have developed a chain of words to use as an insult directed at me over and over. Let's see if you've landed on one yet to demonstrate your autistic fury…

Yup, you're definitely on the spectrum.

Kiddo.

In other words: HE'S A PRO GUN-CONTROL ANTI-2ND AMENDMENT NIGGERFAGGOT. Kill yourself.
Using your ass to talk wasn't funny in Ace Ventura, and it isn't here.

Where does Libertarianism fall on the Autism Spectrum?

It was just a ruse, a ploy. His real goal is to destroy the nation. Mudslime invasion and the great fire are only the beginning.

if understanding economic realities makes you an autist, I don't want to be neurotypical

If it's a direct attack on their sovereignty, not supporting a war Israel started.
Trump has said that they'll support Israel 100%, even if they started a war without an attack on their sovereignty.
What about them? There's a difference between Hillary and Johnson on these issues, yet there's no difference between Hillary and Trump on these issues.
I said that the overwhelming differences between Trump and Hillary are dumb social issues that the federal government shouldn't have a part in, or at least should be light-touch.
Uhh, no. Immigration should have controls. Immigration shouldn't be at a standstill.
No, it's not, but it is somewhat dependent on people with actual skills coming here to work for high technology, or to participate in our high education institutions.
No, open borders would be letting immigrants flood in without controls.
The borders are already secure. The population has leveled off. A wall won't change the remaining desperate percentage that are a very small trickle. They'll just boat in, or tunnel in, with some killing dying in the attempt.
The DEA is an executive agency, so yes. Rescheduling is an executive function.
Good job failing civics 101, le ebin fedora athetist trumpcuck from reddit.
He says he supports free trade, and doesn't support the TPP due to crony capitalism.
Good job failing civics 101, trump cuck atheist redditor.

The president can't just repeal a shitload of laws, dumbass. Even with executive orders.
He can order executive agencies around.

Like what?

All these "He's good, he's done good things, no he isn't, yes he did, he's different on the important issues" vague replies…

Is Johnson the one candidate shitty enough to hire shills to self-promote on 8/tv/? I mean, I think it fits, he advertises on fucking omegle, and this guy is following the shill script to the letter.

Not being a war hawk for starters, his "war on terror" stances. Stance on NSA and mass surveillance. His stances on the IRS, EPA, regulation in general. Executive powers, namely rolling back the "unitary executive theory." Many more.
ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm
No difference between Trump and Hillary on many issues, especially on those of executive power.

At least you're being honest now.
You have to go back, fedora trumpcuck.

So you're a hippy lolbertarian?

This is word for what what you've been doing the entire thread and continue to do right now.

It must suck getting paid to defend such an indefensible candidate.

"Wow user, clearly you failed civics 101 and don't know how the government works. He simply can't do any of those things. He's only one man afterall."

What?

tbh I don't even think Johnson has to cash to hire shills.
Trump cucks do it for free, however, and unironically argue that their candidate is substantially different than Hillary. When he's not.
You definitely need to go back to reddit though, fedora atheist trumpcuck.

lol jewpig

He can:
install advisors, people into the committees that share his stances in all executive agencies. for example, to reschedule drugs based on science, which the federal government doesn't want to seem to do, and so on.
He can't:
repeal laws that have been passed, on gun control for example, without going to congress and drafting additional legislation, getting it passed, and signing it.
Executive agencies like the DEA are under the purview of the president, being part of the executive. While they should be mostly independent, or some abolished completely, installing people who shares his opinions, or with executive orders, is not changing legislation.
So yes, you did fail civics 101.

lmao

I agree with him on those issues though. It might be unfathomable to you but the only question to me regarding those issues is who should wield that executive power not if it should be expanded or not.

He's gone into full autistic meltdown mode. He's just repeating the same text over and over, his brain unable to process how sorely he just got his ass pounded.

Johnson is a cuck and does it for free because he can't afford to pay anyone, and no one would do it for him for free, and he unironically argues that he's substantially different than Hillary, when clearly on all social issues Johnson is not.

Demonstrating his butthurt, or going back to the shill script?

I like how this is an admission you've lost the argument.

So you'd also elect Hillary, but because of identity politics you won't.
So you're a social justice warrior and a trumpcuck. Nice.

Nah
I already named many social issues he differs from Hillary on. You're the one claiming he's not different. And as for actual important issues like governance, not bread and circuses and identity politics shit, he differs substantially.
No one's butthurt here, I rightfully pointed out that you're a redditor that posts meme generator images and screencaps reddit posts.
I haven't lost any argument, I'm barely making an argument, I'm shitposting half of the time.
It must be tought to be a redditor on Holla Forums. Especially an atheist trumpcuck. We don't want you here.

Why would any actual libertarian waste time voting for some Cato in-name-only libertarian? Hell why would any actual libertarian vote for anything except for maybe to vote against something?

He deleted his post apparently, so here's the post before it was deleted:
You'll note that Trump also has all the same stances as Hillary on those issues, so apparently it comes down to identity politics for Trumpcucks. lmao.

I deleted the post because I felt the need to expand upon it. I believe in strong government and in a strong president more specifically. How is Trump going accomplish anything if he goes into libertarian cuck mode? Arguing that he might actually get shit done is not a very compelling argument against him.
No, because I think Trump will be a good administrator, unlike Hillary who has been proven to be shit.

Simply saying "your wrong" will never be an argument, Gary.

No, you did no such thing. He has basically the same view on Israel, abortion, gun control, the TPP and border security as her.

He's Hillary with a dick, albeit a small and useless cuckdick which hasn't seen use in many years, because honestly who would fuck the kind of complete loser who goes around wearing a peace t-shirt under a jacket?

"Nuh-uh"

Everything you're saying is a combination of shilling and shitposting, which is how you're backpeddling after getting your ass handed to you and autistically raging the entire thread. You went from "virgin" to "retard" to "christfag" you just threw out any insult until you landed on your current repeated line of failure. Remember how you posted through your tears when you saw that collage of girls I'd slept with and just declared they weren't real over and over because you couldn't take not being able to be right about a single thing?

We who? You and the voices in your head? I know this is an autism thing, but I'll spell it out for you again: You're one person. You speak for one person. You represent no one. What matters to you doesn't matter to anyone else.

You suck at shilling as bad as you suck at insults and at arguing. You just all around suck.

Like Johnson.

Thus no different than Hillary.
Should pretty much be the executive's function, other than the military: nothing.
They're not a dictator. Legislative should make the laws, not have signing statements that make additional laws.
Executive shouldn't issues EO's rolling back laws that exist.
So, again, you're voting for Hillary, except for the part where he hates beaners and has slightly different social stances. Actually, he might not even have different social stances, if you take his stances from several years ago, even one year ago.

You can't "tighten restrictions" on abortion because it's unconstitutional. See Roe v Wade.
Trump isn't going to defund planned parenthood, and that's up to the legislative, or ultimately up to him if he wants to veto a funding bill that shuts down the government over the fact that the government is funding Planned Parenthood maternity planning, and not abortions. Which is really fucking stupid, because it'd shut down the government, and ultimately fuck the economy like the last time it happened.
The government shouldn't be funding recreational education.

They're not, that's why this piece of shit remained totally silent when the flood of videos of Libertarians saying they absolutely hate Johnson and he isn't a real libertarian were posted earlier.

That party is completely fucked putting this three-time loser up again.

Uhh, no. Hillary would follow Israel into a war, just like Trump. Johnson doesn't support public funding of abortion, Hillary does. Hillary supports gun control, Johnson does not. Hillary support(ed) TPP, Johnson does not. Johnson supports border security, and so does Hillary to an extent. "Muh wall" isn't border security, it's a dumb project that will make it only slightly more secure, at a huge funding cost, which Mexico isn't going to pay.
Who's backpeddling? Not me.
Settle down, virgin. It's only normal to have a collection of amatuers to make into an mspaint collage at the ready when you haven't actually stuck your dick into anything, except maybe a dog or a cat.
Go back to reddit, redditor.

That'd be an improvement, the dispersal of power means that even if someone who's not a crook gets elected they are powerless to turn things around.
Not even trying anymore, are you?

So you support a dictatorship. Even if Hillary is elected, I assume? Or are you just interested in identity politics?
Yeah, you're just interested in ID politics. Not actually substantive issues. Gotcha. You're an authoritarian faggot.

Uhh, yes. He said he would defend them militarily. He lies out of both sides of his mouth, apparently.

He has described himself as 100% pro-choice. Same difference.

Stating he would keep all the laws currently in place is supporting gun control. Not supporting gun control would mean saying he would "do everything in his power to change them".

He SPECIFICALLY said he did you lying sack of shit. It's already been posted in a fucking video. How can you sit here and lie when the proof you're full of shit is right fucking here:

You, you're justifying your utterly shit performance in this discussion (which you totally don't care about btw and totally shouldn't be on Holla Forums yet you've been posting in it for hours) by saying you've been shitposting this entire time. Utter failure.

You're so assmad no one's going to vote for your fail of a candidate. Remember when you mentioned identity politics? That's what this is you stupid fuck. You lose the argument, so you trot out "Virgin" "christfag" "atheistfag" "reddit" "fucking retard" attacking me with ad hominems and admiting YOU GOT FUCKING OWNED AND YOUR CANDIDATE SUCKS SHIT. You have to focus on me, if we focus on your fail of a candidate you look stupid as fuck. So you go right back to the shill handbook, and attack the person who's made you look like a complete idiot.

And in so doing, I win again and you lose again. It's what you're best at, afterall.

Yup, it's not like the people have much power in the currently existing forms of representative democracy anyway. Consolidating all power in one sovereign seems like a better solution to me.
Nope, because she's a puppet and won't serve national interests. There is such a thing as a bad ruler, you have those both in democracies and in dictatorships.
I certainly do care about preserving the cultural and ethnic identity, that's not something you're going to make me feel bad about, but that's not the only thing I care about. I don't give a shit about John Locke though.

Against a direct attack on their sovereignty. Not if they went to war. Both Hillary and Trump would follow them into a war no matter what. That's Trump's stance. Trump's stances is also that of intervention in the middle east for various reasons, by hiring the architect of the Iraq war as a foreign policy advisor, and so is Hillary's. They're all for droning without a declaration of war, except for Johnson. They're all for following Israel into war without a precursor, except for Johnson. They're all for excusions in the middle east, except for Johnson.
Uhh, no. And Trump has also described as 100% pro choice in the past. The difference is no public funding. What don't you get about this? You aren't going to roll back Roe v Wade.
Again, that's not up to him. The president can't roll a magic wand. He'd have to work with congress. He's stated that he would sign legislation to repeal the gun controls up to this point, and believes controls are ineffective.
No, he didn't. He said, based on what he knew (which wasn't anything, because the text wasn't revealed at that point) that he would sign TPP because he's for "free trade." He said that if it supported crony capitalism, he wouldn't sign TPP. When the text was revealed, it was shown that it was yet another crony capitalism trade agreement, and he wouldn't sign TPP.
Clinton had pushed it hard, knowing all of the crony capitalism support in it.
Nah
That's what you're doing, identity politics. Because there's no difference between Trump and Hillary.

Just like Trump.
Which Trump won't preserve.

This has to be bait. There cannot really be people this stupid.

THIS JUST IN, LIBERTARIAN PARTY MEMBER ADMITS DEFEAT, CAN'T NAME SINGLE SPECIFIC DIFFERENCE, CRIES 'AUTHORITARIAN' WHILE ADMITTING HIS CANDIDATE IS POWERLESS AND RESORTS TO CHILDISH INSULTS. STATUS OF DIAPER UNKNOWN, BELIEVED TO BE FULL OF SHIT. TEARS OVERFLOWING AS HE SCREECHES IN AUTISTIC RAGE
It's amazing how current year lolbergs are exactly the same as the left. "BUZZWORD BUZZWORD BUZZWORD GO BACK TO Holla Forums EVIL BUZZWORD"

Fuck off, jew.

Thoroughly defeated.

So what are you, a kike or a sandnigger?

So, again, let's sum up everything in the thread up to this point:
* Good goys will vote for good goy Trump, who hangs the tree of life and various Jewish awards on his wall, and will follow Israel into a war no matter what
* Good goys will vote for Trump despite the fact that he hired the architect of the Iraq war as a foreign policy advisor, who will advise excursions into the middle east.
* Good goys will vote for Trump despite the fact that he's for droning without a declaration of war by congress.
* Good goys will vote for Trump despite the fact that there's no substantive differences between Trump and Hillary
* Good goys will vote for Trump despite the fact that he's flipflopped on stances of dumb social issues that they value the most compared to several, and even one year ago.

There's not left on the economic spectrum. They're right-wing. Jill Stein and Sanders are left wing on the economic spectrum. The liberals in canada are right wing on the economic spectrum.
The dumb trumpcuck stated that he's an atheist, and he's definitely a redditor.
I'm none of those.

Also should note that both Obama and Hillary are right-wing on the economic spectrum.

I don't think so, he is a deal maker and he is pragmatic but I don't think he is a puppet. Otherwise the media, the republicans and everyone else wouldn't have fought so hard against him.
He can't make any moves to do so because the democratic system prevents it, which is one of the many reasons I said it would be better with a dictatorship. Giving negroes and all that other trash voting rights pozzed the system.

Johnson's for drones, and saying he'd "Defend them militarily" is still meddling in foreign affairs and joining them in war no matter how you rephrase it.
Uhh, yes.
Currently however he's most against it than either Johnson or Hillary, and that's what matters to me. Who is closest to my values. It sure as fuck isn't Johnson. Drugs and hookers will not help or economy. Open borders will destroy the country. Keeping all the current gun control laws is a shitty policy.

The thing is, he's talked about "waving a magic wand" for other issues he does care about, specifically financial ones. Why isn't he willing to offer to "wave this magic wand" on gun control? Simply saying it's out of his hands means he isn't going to try to effect any real change on the matter. Thus he's effectively pro-gun control.
Saying he would sign TPP doesn't mean he supports it, ladies and gentlemen. You're reaching Clintonian levels of doublespeak with this idiocy.
Yeah.
"The personal is the political" - Hillary. And then you attack me, personally with childish, pathetic personal attacks. You're using identity politics. I'm pointing this out because you started bringing the term up when you've been using identity politics throughout this entire thread by way of ad hominem.

You just keep stating this over and over. Trump wants to build a wall, Hillary and Johnson don't. Trump would defund Planned Parenthood, Hillary wouldn't and Johnson is 100% pro-choice. Trump is against gun control, Hillary and Johnson aren't, Trump is against the TPP, both Hillary and Johnson have stated they would sign it. You can disagree with his positions, but to say Hillary and Trump are the same just makes you look retarded when these clear, definitive policy differences are rubbed right in your stupid face.

Everyone fights hard against everyone else. They fight hard against Hillary despite the fact that there's little to no differences, of substance, between their candidates and Hillary.
It's all a dumb game, you're just too stupid to fucking realize it. They're all status quo.

All you say in every fucking post is "They're the same regardless of the differences people point out and you're just stupid if you say otherwise for reasons I can't even find this far up my own ass" over and over.

Whether or not you think the wall is stupid, that alone means they're different, on top of the dozens of other reasons people have pointed out. Hillary has had people killed for fuck's sake you miserable shill.

Nope, Trump is an outsider.

Waste of independence digits, and you are backpedaling like a cornered kike. You quite literally started with "he's not in favor of removing prior anti-2nd amendment laws and supports adding even more of them" and now you're trying to push "H-HE CAN'T REPEAL THEM H-HE C-C-C-C-AN'T". Are you even trying?

And here you dumb nigger you are trying to say he CAN do whatever he want as an executive (which will NEVER EVER happen because you fail to realize lolbergs will NEVER EVER get anything close to a winning vote) by setting his cabinet the way he wants to.

Here we see the lolberg's brain short circuiting.

Not without a declaration of war by congress, which is saying he's against the current use of drones. Because there's been no declaration of war against the countries they're used in.
Is much different than "support them 100%" and follow them into any excursion they see fit to do, which is what Trump's stance is.
No, it's not. There's a big difference between restricting abortions being unconstitutional, which is something you cannot change, and public federal funding of abortion.
The only thing he's said "waving a magic wand" about is the IRS, which is why he said it's impossible to abolish it in even two terms. He'd have to fucking wave a magic wand to do so, is what he said.
Based on what he knew, because he was for free trade. When the crony capitalism was revealed, as he said he would, he said he wouldn't sign it.
We're on a fucking imageboard, on a television board, and you're shitposting and having a discussion that is meant for Holla Forums. Of course I would, you fucking atheist redditor. You really need to go back.
lmao "muh wall."
They don't want to because it's fucking stupid.
After saying he wouldn't, and saying they do good work. And then he said he'd shut down the government over it. Yeah, you can totally trust his stance on anything of substance when he switches from "I support it, it does good work" to "I'd shut down the government to oppose public funding of maternity planning" within a week. jesus christ, faggot.
That's just pathetic.

What's so bad about drone strikes taking out sandniggers?

Not based on his stances.
Actually it's quite appropriate.
No, I'm saying that he's in charge of executive agencies, being the head of the executive. Are you braindead?
I've already pointed out about a dozen major issues in which they are the same.

They take out his brothers.

Maybe in your dumbfuck world where Tru mp is "right- wing" and Hil lary is "le ft- wing" Except they're both in line on economic issues. Lock-step, in fact.

And the lolberg's brain continues to melt.

Oh look, still nothing to back up your claims.

Don't think you can hide your autism.

It's some sort of filter.
Try posting it yourself. I deleted it after I made a comment on /sudo/
Remove the spaces:
Tru mp is "right- wing" and Hil lary is "le ft- wing"

...

It's either that or the parser taking a huge shit, which is even worse.
But that wouldn't be unexpected, because the parser is known to be a huge piece of shit, as is expected of the software running this website.
Take your pick: parsing bug or global filtering of text.

wew this thread went to shit in record time. politics are boring but they make for great autism fights. im actually voting this year for trump but not because i think he will actually do anything. he just makes the people i hate very assmad and i want that salt in november if he wins.

Are you admitting to being a bot using shill, lolberg?

Do lolbertarians know they are working for the jews?

The comment parser of Holla Forums, retard.

That's a respectable reason to vote for him. I don't really care about that. I care about the autists who unironically believe that he's any different from Hillary.
Which includes the social justice warriors, too.
Basically any identity politics faggot believes that the two candidates are wildly different. Holla Forumsacks (natsocs) and SJWs.

If you're voting for him as a joke, I have no problem with that. I might vote for him too, for that reason, as I said.

>including the tree of life award en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_National_Fund_Tree_of_Life_Award
lmao

i want it so bad i can taste it. i mean dont get me wrong Holla Forums will be salty if he loses but it wont be the same. Holla Forums is used to not getting what they want, it will have a strong tinge of inevitability to it. the sjw fags and the dems are riding high on years of unchallenged dominance. their salt will be epic and never ending. it helps that i hate them so much more than some powerless nazi neets on the imageboards too.

Now your'e just making it up. Very pathetic, Gary.

You have still not once ever posted any actual proof or backing to this meme you keep spouting. Want to know how we know you're full of shit, nigger?

He just doesn't want to end up assassinated.

When did the millennials take over fullchan? If you buy into the MSM spectacle you simply don't belong here, take your virtue-signalling back to social media, newfags.

Hardcore neutrals really are the dumbest fucking people.
Saying they're both bad is one thing (it really is sad that we have to choose between an obnoxious celebrity and a murderous cunt), but saying they're the exact same is like comparing herpes to syphilis.

They're both STDs! That totes means they have the same effect on everything!

Dog shit and cat shit both smell like shit. Stating the obvious doesn't make you neutral in that context.

Also, in that context, none are wildly different than the other. Usually dog shit is bigger, probably has a different flavor, so if you willingly want to eat dog shit to try it out be our guest. But don't pretend that they're wildly different. They're both hunks of shit.

Have you thanked Merkel and the (((EU))) for the muslim rape gangs yet?

Nice irrational cynicism faglord.

I can tell you didn't even bother to read Johnson's Wikipedia page.

Go to Hell, Ted Cruz.