Twitter banning people for not liking CISbusters

In 15 years you will be a conservative if you don't approve of pedophilia.

Fuck this world.

Implying pedosexual rights not becoming mainstream

No one argues they aren't privately owned and can do what they want, but there is a false perception that they follow guidelines that are applied evenly.

It's why people argue about instances like this, it is an example of Twitter showing their bias which is troublesome when you consider that people are gaining a false perception of what others on social media are thinking since things are being censored to prevent them seeing wrongthink.

It's like an extension of shilling. What companies like Twitter are doing is editing spaces where people are conversing so that only Twitter approved views are viewed as the dominant view. And since a lot of people think if there's a consensus on a particular view that is must be right, this leads to people viewing only the moderator's views as being right.

...

...

It's sort of shit that makes me think people don't retreat into safe spaces so much as they get constructed around them.

They get all that wrongthink censored in whatever area they go to so they never realize what arguments are being kept from them and eventually think there are no other arguments.

Is Holla Forums the most cucked board on Holla Forums?

Will you fuck my wife?

the light of the sun is blinding and painful and only after time can you see

don't be surprised so many go back into the cave

Funnily enough right wingers are okay with bakeries refusing service to gay people, yet when twitter refuses service to a conservative suddenly its a gross injustice.

As long as you accept twitter as a private company that can ban whoever they want for whatever reason then you have to accept the company's political biases. People can stop using twitter anytime they please. That is unless of course you consider it to be such a public resource of information that you'd want the government to step in and make a neutrality law.

jesus fucking christ, the very first post of this thread states that twitter has the right to do so since it's a private company, and everyone agrees
take your fucking meds and piss off back to your containment hugbox, >>>Holla Forums

Then what are you dumb niggers complaining about.

The problem with that reasoning is the same problem that we saw on cuckchan: The application of their policies are inconsistent and the punishments often vary wildly.

Point is, they banned Milo because Milo doesn't share the Twitter staff's political views, and because he's such a visible, popular social media figure, he gets a ton of reports for everything he posts.

All that aside, twitter is a massive platform used by hundreds of millions of people around the world. Same as facebook, google, instagram, youtube, and all the rest.

When you've got this many users, there's a certain point where the chance to pick sides is gone and won't ever come back. After that point, it's not just a matter of being privately-owned and enforcing rules as they please, because that becomes all the more obvious that they are trying to force people to think the way their libtard employees do.

Same argument can be made for all news organizations.

>>>Holla Forums

Anyway, the real issue is that they're not consistent. If they only want to punish some people for things they let others get away with then they should be clear that this is company policy. If a vagina or an overdose of melanin gives you a free pass to break the rules then that should be in the bloody rules.

See I'm fine with a company not serving gays, not serving whites or whatever but they need to make this a policy. If you're still going to make the gays a cake but make a shitty one on purpose, make them wait forever on it or accidentally put poison in it because you hate gays then that's an entirely different thing.

Here THE thing, twitter is suppose to remain neutral as everyone has the right to access and communicate as it a social platform, and you can go on that they're a private company but their model of business is one that need to be open to everyone and IT UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL TO BLOCK SHIT THEU DON'T LIKE. As for the "gay cake" arguement both side of that issue are equally fucking dumb. In a business sense restricting your client and your profits for belief but that was THE INDIVIDUAL OWNER decision to do so. The arguement of it the current year is in the realm the gov't meddling in the decision of a individual and the free market, let the free market do it thing.

You fucking idiot.

Nobody is saying it isn't censorship; however, since Twitter is a private business, they can censor whatever the fuck they see fit to censor (business have the right to "refuse service to anyone" in the US).

And precisely because Twitter is a private owned business, there's one effective way people who don't agree with their policies can use to manifest their discontentment and punish their shareholder for their draconian policies: leaving the platform. Twitter is a fucking shitty site who provide no valuable service at all, which make money by selling the users' data to advertisers. If they drop their userbase by millions of people after a few months because of their new "safe space policies", then they'll feel it where it hurts the Jews: their shekels.

While masses of idiots keep using and legitimizing Twitter as a platform for discourse, however, they'll still hold enough power to do whatever they want. Apparently the Milo minions started a #FreeMilo bullshit hashtag campaing, which is both slackvism as its finest AND empowers Twitter even more. But I think that's to be expected from twitterfags, I think. Explaining them the benefits of a mass exodus would take more than 140 characters, so they wouldn't be able to process the information.

if you actually bothered reading any post in this discussion you could see it by yourself what is it that we're complaining about
but i understand that expecting you to read and comprehend other people's posts is asking too much from a leftshit

Twitter also advertises itself as an open platform available to be used by people of multiple political lenses. What they're clarifying now is that those political lenses range from hard left to communism.

Also, they want twitter to stop giving feminists PTSD.

Oh no, what a news story. Milo is exactly the same as Wu but you like Milo because "he's one of us"

Yeah, and what are you going to do about it? Continue to use the platform that doesn't want your kind around there (and its making that explicity), or will you fuck off, boycott it as a consumer and search for a friendly alternative?

"you" as in the twatter conservative user, not "you" the poster

Hell, Milo is (alledgedly) Breitbart tech editor. He should know different platforms that he could put his faggy weight behind to promote as an alternative to Twitter. Instead he and his minions will probably start hashtag campaings about how unfair his ban was (which may be true, but then again, you know Twitter does that, and you won't change their policies).

...

Yeah, that's the shit that needs to happen. Twitter is a god awful platform in the first place. People need to realize that they can just leave. They don't owe twitter anything and twitter needs them. Not the other way around.

Flynt got banned from twitter?

No? Then STFU

...

...

Milo can be my Wing man any day

...

they're a publicly owned company you dumb fuck.

it's almost like the whole liberal versus conservative mindset is a deliberate framing device that was purposely designed to keep the public from realizing the true scale of how hard they're getting fucked.

not wanting to bake a cake for gays isn't the same as banning a gay from your bakery leftycuck.

I think he meant that they have private shareholders; and are not beholden to free speech and censorship laws that a government owned institute would be (not that King Obongo respects that anyway).

Why do you think Trump scared the shit out of the (((establishment))) on both the left and the right? Populism runs completely opposite to the establishment's intentions and interests.

That all falls away when women or nigs go off script. Once they cease being good little goyim, they're treated just as harshly as any cis hetero Christian white male shitlord.

Nah m8. That's where your SJW-lite clique make a mistake. What Twitter is doing is a form of discrimination and that doesn't fly, even if you don't believe you can abuse the white or conservative.

Sounds like he is getting blamed for what Holla Forums and Holla Forums did to Leslie Jones.

I wonder who could be behind this post

Fuck off jew.

>>>Holla Forums

Only if you refuse the "right" people. Refuse the "wrong" people and you get sued for MUH DISCRIMINATION. Jews.

Oh (((you))).

Fuck off Holla Forums.

If only this guy wasnt white, the damage he would do to these sjw would be tenfold

Reminder:

Twitter Unveils New ‘Trust and Safety Council’ Featuring Feminist Frequency

breitbart.com/tech/2016/02/09/twitter-unveils-new-trust-and-safety-council-featuring-feminist-frequency/

the fraud Anita Sarkeesian is on Twitter's Safety Council.

That's the point of Milo, user. Milo is there to sew the seeds of future roadblocks for the God-fearing Conservative party by showing you can somehow be a flaming Jewish faggot and a God-fearing Conservative at the same time. This is obviously counter to any genuine Christian belief that recognizes Jews and homosexuals as workers of iniquity and minions of Satan. Not that there are many genuine practitioners in Burgerland at the moment, what the with the Evangelicals and all, but this is still a potential roadblock to fully unfucking Christianity and the right in the U.S.A.

He isn't white, he is a Greek Jew.

Fuck off Anita

Is NeoFAG some kind of hardcore roleplaying site where everyone pretends to be some kind of mentally disabled mod boot licker?

Naturally, the progressives feel like they can just revoke the minority or female identity from people who don't follow their wishes. They don't really give a shit about the identity groups they say they "fight for".

I hope there was film at 11 for that!

ISIS is a two prong thing.

1. Alphabet agencies can use the service to track what they are doing. Albeit not very well obviously, but it could be useful.

2. Twitter is, at the end of the day, NOT REALLY OWNED BY JACK.

It is owned by a Saudi prince. Who may, as a matter of course, have less of a problem with jihadis than he would with white right wing British faggots.

gary johnson for president 2016 vote or die motherfucker

Yet it's within their right to do so. As it is the right of everybody else who doesn't agree to simply walk away from their stupid policies. Make them bleed into irrelevance and let them become Tumblr 2.0.

myspace 2.0

people still use tumblr

I supposed the KKK should allow niggers and kikes to join their ranks since doing otherwise would be "discrimination".

It's a fucking web application for shitposting, for fuck sake. I think it was much more of a discrimination against conservatives when his talk on an universtity was interrupted by some shouting negros and the security he himself had hired didn't do nothing. He got banned, big deal, either change platform or learn 2 ban evade, faggot.

Yeah, but Twitter still has a certain credibility tied to it, while Tumblr is forever tied to otherkins, rainbow-haired landwhales, and a ballpít filled with piss. If Twitter ends up on that same ditch Tumblr cornered itself into when it became the go-to platform for special snowflakes, then I'm happy with that outcome.

Oh, I think it's the hypocrisy that has people rustled. Some animals are more equal than others.

Apparently that's a phrase that some "libertarians" here aren't bothered by anymore, it seems.

Not that I'm interested in whether twitter bans him or not, but he's a genuine celebrity now.

That is true, when you speak at an American political convention where you follow up Senators and Governors, you are a full public figure…

Imagine if they banned Trump. I could see that going forward now.

Which I would have no problem with
IF THEY DIDN'T FUCKING LIE ABOUT THEIR INTENTIONS.
If they admitted "we censor right-wing/conservative accounts and trends" I would have no problem with them doing so. My issue is that they pretend that they are all for free speech, but they shadowban people and pretend that they only ban people when they have really good reason to do so. It's the misrepresentation that is so Jewy about this situation.

One more reason to boycott it, don't you think?

...

What's with Milo's new hair? He looks like a Gay Polnareff

So Polnareff then…

Milo is just a fag with an audience; Trump is (potentially) the next POTUS. The backlash would be so great, it could really jeopardize them (by making their stock value crash with no survivors). So I really hope they do it.

...

I've seen all the disgusting homophobic and racist tweets this so-called comedian Leslie Jones has made. And yet the liberals jump to defend her. I am changing my vote to Trump because of twitter's actions.

Polnareff likes the ladies

this guy gets it.

cute.

sup reddipol, how's the social signalling?

Go back to your containment board
>>>/oven/

Firstly, they're a publicly traded company and secondly they also control large swathes of public information and are used by multiple members of the public, which means they have a responsibility to the public not to censor that information out of turn. So this 'they're a private company, they can do what they want' crap really isn't going to fly.

Not to mention Mark ZOGerberg and various other ((((social media)))) platforms are working with the EU to censor anti-rapefugee speech, it's hardly a case of "le just private owners doing what they want" when you have that subhuman whore Merkel demanding censorship from said private entities.

I just can't bring myself to care when bad things happen to faggots. Bad things need to happen to all faggots. They're a cancer on civilization. They don't know how to stop themselves from trampling the foundation of civilization: the nuclear family. They're pathological and they must be stopped.

did you miss the entire thing where we sent gorillas to her twitter feed for 5 hours while she chimped out about it? The media is saying Milo was behind it and that is why he was banned from Twitter.

Yeah that's why I said "Gay Polnareff" his thirst for the ladies is never sated.

Notice I didn't say it was a bad thing if they did that.

...

Haha. I know, I just am not a big fan of Polnareff except in Vento Auro

How you dips missed out on the Log Cabin Republicans for so long is beyond me.

Twitter is a shit website. Its only good for trolling and following the porn bots.

Still funny how making fun of Ghostbusters of all things will get you banned.

...

trips of truth

...

Only LGBTI pedosexual rights are becoming mainstream

Twitter is a biased shit hole that hates those who seem unprogressive and intolerant of the things they enjoy and will adopt fascist behavior if it suits them despite supposedly condemning it? Who knew.

Can't say I'm surprised about this either.

They get around it by calling pederasty.

Just how fucking insecure are you wow lol

Are you really surprised that a clique of narcissistic lunatics perform unethical actions towards you after slandering and mocking your group constantly via news articles and media coverage?

Double down and go full 1488.

They already think that you're a nazi anyway.

The gay rights movement tried that with NAMBLA before. Harry Hays even endorsed that organization, but it backfired and gave them bad PR, so they dropped them in the 80s. You won't know about it because it's memoryholed by the press.

I have no doubt in my mind that they will try it again though.

We're at the point where you can get sued up to six figures for using incorrect pronouns. I don't think that we're that far overall.

But see what they called a 50 man dating a 20 years old woman, for them that is pedophilia. But grooming a little boy to dance in a gay pride parade, that's progressiveness and diversity.

Marxists are now straight up pushing for normalization of pedophilia. They've had a few articles here and there to lay the groundwork, and a bunch of speeches at Oxford and the like to prep the academia for the next big thing.

But again, they endorse LGBT Pedophila. They have in common with the rest of normal people that they denounce when a straight man is preying in a little girl, but they barely bat an eye when an adult woman molest a boy or a girl (see Lena Dunham) or gays and transvestites grooming boys.

Wasn't that the one where he was a cripple, and blind in one eye?

anyone who doesn't do that gets permabanned

They were always aiming for that from the start. It just seems recent because they've don't mention their previous failed attempts so that they can accumulate useful idiots that would promote any cause that they have.

Don't forget Rotherham and thousands of other cases like it, or what is currently going on in Europe thanks to the influx of "refugees".

Oh, I'm well aware that pedophilia is the holy grail of the left.

I can't find the article I'm looking for, but there it had a description of what they called the "fuck/sex hour", where they put two children in a room, with a one-way glass, and, I'm paraphrasing, "did everything in their power to get the children to fuck".

The only good leftist is a dead one.

The guy on the left is Jack, the guy who permabanned Milo. He's a flaming homo and is obsessed with black cock almost as much as our goons here are. That's also why he is so pro BLM, he has a crush on a black supremacist.

I need this article please

Funnily enough left wingers are okay with Twitter refusing service to conservative people, yet when bakeries refuse service to a gay couple suddenly its a gross injustice.

More proof that there is no reason to extend any courtesy whatsoever to leftists.

Might be a couple more in here: imgur.com/a/D0UZg

...

Looks like he has the GRIDS.

Not the GRIDS!

So it was jealousy. A leftist flaming homo obsessed with black cock is jealous of a conservative flaming homo obsessed with black cock, and the conservative homo is stealing the attention from him.

Legally many are alright with it, but how many think of it as morally right?

You're bringing up an example of people thinking it's wrong to go after someone with the law to justify someone else doing something that seems immoral. The people I'm seeing bring up this argument don't appear to be thinking this through.

No one is against Twitter legally censoring people. They're not thinking you're going to seriously sue them and they don't think you're going to jail them for it (at least most aren't).

It's a philosophical question and not a legal one. It's also a fairly important philosophical question as you have to wonder if it's even a good thing to essentially ghettoize yourself by quietly leaving when they choose your beliefs as not belonging on their platform.

I like how the cake example is being brought up so often regarding this controversy since it's revealing an interesting mindset in those that dislike it. Since the reason many leftists have said they were against cake shops refusing service was because it was treating a group unfairly, essentially pushing the group into an odd subsection of society or in other words ghettoizing them.

Then you also have the cuckservative types that think it's wrong to criticize anyone being censored as though it makes them as bad as leftists.

What's the name of this fresh meme?

Shitty mspaint comics?

Think they got started by a guy at The Right Stuff to make fun of some of the demented views and hypocrisies of a lot of liberals/cuckservatives.

Yes fellow Holla Forums user we certainly put her in her place

the destruction of The Nigger Leslie Jones's ego is a great victory for ethics in video games journalism, fellow #GamerGate-er. ;^)

That's bullshit, everyone knows we did it at the behest of 4chan and KotakuInAction.

smuggies
heres some more

goin all in actually tbh

...

...

News flash, most non-anonymous sites are exactly like that.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Thank you, Stan.

lol someone call her Smellody

Ha

You might have a shred of a point if he was suing Twitter. He isn't, you silly shill.

Infowars is a pretty good news source as they don't do a lot of dishonest editing like so many other news sources do.

Their commentary can be insane at times, but they're at least honest about reporting actual events. Which is part of why they're a more popular news source than MSNBC and (I think) CNN.

He was straight?

I think you mean "rage face comics", user.

Holla Forums's bringing back every old meme for better or worse. You ready for a resurgance of slowpoke and Milhouse?

It's obvious in hindsight given how attached they are to Le Happy Merchant and Le Facebook Frog.

...

It's the current year and I AM SILLY

The rage face comics all tried using the exact same few faces rather than caricatures of actual people.

What sets the shitty mspaint comics apart is that they're essentially a parody of the argument comics and the various pictures with quotes that SJWs would typically use as a way of ignoring arguments.

That image is just strawmanning.

Strawmen are increasingly becoming poes.

It's an exaggeration, not a strawman exactly as we constantly see people acting as living examples of these comics.

Like in you have the people that cry horseshoe over anyone disagreeing being made fun of, and yes we do actually see people constantly trying to act as though groups that disagree with another are exactly the same as the group they're disagreeing with.

Did it hit too close to home?

To be fully honest, we're running out of good memes. Best thing to do would be revive some old ones and try to improve them. Oh fuck we've become the modern film industry.

From a Constanza poster?

DO you really think you somehow have the higher ground here? Seriously, are you malfunctioning?

he got banned because he posted fake screencaps

Yeah that's exactly what happened

...

what the fuck is this neogaf thing anyway

circle jerk if vidya 'insiders'

Most people just lurk because bans are handed out without little reason

btw the Cisbusters is currently being streamed in infinity.moe

If you work for Imdb you're not allowed to give this movie a negative review

No safe space for instigators.