"In Germany, Marx and Engels, working on the basis of the radical Hegelian dialectic...

What did he mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=EVKoDtI-jis
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Didn't Adorno make a similar argument about Hegel leading to fash?

Less people die in blanquism

I agree with you on this one, the proletarian revolution would be much harder today, if for example we trusted upon a few marxist leninists politicians to coup the government and bring the revolution then it would be a way easier and peaceful process.

That Bakunin was right.

Bakunin was more Blanquist than Marx.

That was my point.

Nothing wrong with Blanquism or Hegelianism.

blanquism is more utopian than social democracy.

Stop Larping and read Marx,Lenin and Stalin before calling yourself an ML, what you are saying is retarded and anti-Leninist

Marx was in no way like blanqui though.

Blanqui was GOAT.
youtube.com/watch?v=EVKoDtI-jis

No, he made the opposite argument, that Hegel' position on the unviability unilinear development and translation of history was compatible with Marxism, but explicitly excluded fascism

Can you cite a source for this?

Bakunin was a Blanquist in his early life but with his anarchism he completely abandoned that position and made it very clear that only the masses can emancipate themselves.

Other than both being inherently bourgeois positions.

How is either bourgeois?

Both deny the proletariat as revolutionary subject and instead place the state in their position.

This is basically the whole point of his book 'Negative Dialectics', was that coherence and logical abridgment was a substitute for emancipatory or otherwise fully totalizing being

Still doesn't mean Blanquism or Hegelianism are bourgeois.

How is that not bourgeois?