WATCH OUT BROSOCIALISTS

reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/78kzfe/brocialism_what_it_is_and_how_to_fight_it/

LOL

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5dytp6CMNAk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

slowpoke.jpg

hurrr biology

...

"I've always seen brocialism as kind of liberalism."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, let's just reduce class to one of 10,000 different dimensions of oppression, porky will really be shaking in his boots then.

God forbid we have any objective analysis of the landscape of domination, where I don't know, the literal thing that we all slave to, the almighty dollar, is pretty high up on that list?

I'm not going to sit here and deny being a straight ciswhite dude hadn't made my life easier.

But sometimes it really is absurd.

I've even had conversations with a trans friend who privately confessed they were getting sick of the opression Pissing contests in idpol.

we got to go deeper, GENETIC PRIVILEGE,
more chromosomes more privilege

They are literally saying "Ending racism will end class conflict". The absolute departure from theory into the spectacle is amazing. The much more logical conclusion is to end Capitalism, to stop the racism, which will never end as long as some faggots can just "you're fired from my means lol" to people.

Anyone else notice SJW always need to smash something?

Everything but capitalism or the state. I wonder why that could be?

But isn't intersectionality built upon capitatlism?
I think you can make a decent argument for "libertarians" from an intersectional perspective, but don't think that school of though exists much.

In theory intersectionality is compatible with socialism, in practice it is used to shift focus from labor issues to social issues.

Solidarity works better though. Intersectionality is the product of the neoliberal managerial state. It provides nothing to socialism that isn't already there.

...

And I agree. Unfortunately certain socialists don't agree and keep pushing it on popular sites.

that's not the point. non-liberal idpol realize that things like racism and sexism can not be overcome in a capitalist society, and at the same time you can't overcome a capitalist society without *actively* combating and abolishing those forms of oppression.

please fix your reddit spacing.

Lol I'm starting to comprehend, why so many people hate, Anarcho anything.
I'm actually starting to gain interest in reading Lenin.
I'm so ashamed, I for some time, hung out with Anarcho syndicalists and Anarcho communists, that where full into Idpol, I hated it from the very beginning.
I'm not even going to waste, anymore time in reddit and in /r/socialism, I'm proud of never using that site, fucking pathetic scum.

oxymoron

Do it. Just remember that there are Leninists (especially on reddit) who are just as deep into idpol as any anarcha-feminist or whatever.

I know.
but I have seen it with my own eyes and I got heckled in public, in an Anarchist meeting, for saying that I didn't supported feminism, because socialism would overcome and abolish all inequalities.

This cuck-wheel is interesting. It is also the opposite of capitalism.

Capitalism uses profit as a measuring tool. It isn't perfect. And applying it consistently would be as keep hammering a nail after it's driven in.

Because a trade union in negotiation with a company is speaking the same language and adressing the same question: How should the profit be split?

It is telling that countries with small trade unions have the worst trade unions; France and UK.

Lolcom X was totally wrong. First, the US race problems are in a way unique. There is no reason to analyze all race problems after the US. (Such as Sweden where it's jews and romani beggars that are persecuted the most, not blacks and muslims.)

Second, there was and are countries with little race problems that are more or less capitalistic.

I'm not opposed to idpol, I just find the tactics of the modern vanguard to be completly authoritarian and at odds with any thing resembling critical theory or pedagogy. I hate how they have let the right define the terms of the debate and actively promoting things like race essentialism and anti free speech.

hmm

Lol who cares what /r/socialism thinks? If you publicly lose a 4v1 debate against a fucking meme then you should probably consider finding some humility and relieving yourself of whatever authority you have on the left, not sanctimoniously plowing on anyway and trying to lead the way in something you don't know fuck all about

???

Its a board with 100 000 subscribers on the 8th most heavily trafficked site in the world, which is bigger than twitter btw.

They are the first port of call on a site with tens of millions of users and they are defining socialism in the minds of those people.

If you think their malign influence is irrelevant you are an idiot.

You miss my point entirely. If Jason fucking Unruhe can objectively beat their rhetoric in a debate, than anyone can.

every day /r/socialism makes me more and more nazbol

Grow up. Line breaks existed in conversation online before readdot was even a thing.

I see you missed this gem
youtube.com/watch?v=5dytp6CMNAk

And imageboards lend themselves to less linebreaks, and by spacing like crazy you give yourself away as a relative newbie. This is like calling underwear pants and getting super flustered that people can tell you're not american

Made me kek

I fucking hate these people so much. They're the reason socialism won't gain any traction.

How the hell do they hope to gain any popularity when the average Joe would get bullied to pieces setting foot in their circlejerk?

they don't want popularity. they just want to feel they're better than other people

You can support feminism by supporting equality while at the same time taking issue with how the movement is currently distorted and removed from goals of equality

Everybody who still believes in IdPol should read this screencap

Creating your own revolutionary organisation and not allowing them to set a foot in.

We had an actual chance to get a Democratic Socialist into the White House. We would have moved further left than the last 50 years. The only reason he lost is because "Bernie Brocialists" were the only ones voting for him, while SJWs/feminists couldn't support a white male so they voted the corporatist in just because MUH VAGINA

What a jet of hot shit. The DNC wanted Shillary as candidate so they conspired against Sanders.

That's only part of it. Bernie was dragged through the mud as a sexist because he was a white male and we were told to vote for Hillary because she's a woman. "Brocialists" still voted for Bernie, and DNC rigging wouldn't have worked without support from anti-male feminists

Pick one.

But seriously, incel reactionaries may have a point about women being the weakest link in any chain.

Absolutely massive cheating aside (investigations when?), there was also a lot of robotic "vote for Clinton because that's what we always did" behavior among blacks & hispanics that weren't too dejected to vote.

One thing I dont like is another thing I don't like even though they are two different things

it is tho

it's Shitlery neolibs trying to cut the balls off any moderately effectual resistance to their bullshit

the jews

Explain

...