Report: Half of Millennials Want Socialism

Report: Half of Millennials Want Socialism

According to a recent survey, a majority of American Millennials want socialism or communism, but don't fully grasp the implications of those beliefs.

trunews.com/article/report-half-of-millennials-want-socialism

According to the results of a new survey released by the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, “the majority of America’s largest generation would prefer to live in a socialist or communism society than in a free enterprise system that respects the rule of law, private property, and limited government.” This is the second year the Washington, D.C., based anti-communism think tank has conducted the survey, but the results were no better than last year’s assessment. In fact, they’re a little worse. More Millennials would prefer to live in a socialist country than in a capitalist one by a margin of 44-42 percent, while another seven percent said they would prefer to live in a communist country. Doing the math—44 plus 7—that’s 51 percent of Millennials who would prefer to not live in a country with a free-market economy. Sadly, that’s only 10 points higher than the rest of the general population. The VCMF statement regarding the survey concludes:


As VCMF notes, communism isn’t making a comeback—it simply never went away with the end of the Cold War. And, as we remember the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, it’s rearing its ugly head once again. But this time, we seem less prepared to meet the challenge.

Socialism in this case meaning free college and government neetbux.

Do the math user, that is means that out of the millennials who want to live in a socialist country, 86 percent don't know what socialism is. Varg was right, we really are getting dumber.

Isn't it our job to educate them? At least the revolutionary potential is there.

When half of Millennials want Marxism-Leninism, then we're in business. "Socialism" is a very vague term unless it's used in the strict Leninist sense.

they just want more gibsmedats

that would require sitting up from my chair

These dipshits have been drinking their own kool-aid for so long they can't see straight.

Unfortunately, no. Most of them want to continue living in the cosmopolitan liberal capitalist society they already live in. They just want to maximise their ability to compete with other workers by demanding more free shit. Specifically, shit that generates Mr Porkington hundreds of billions of dollars a year like the higher education racket because that is what """socialism""" is according to the Guardian and the Imperial Times.

Education (outside of some of the hard sciences) is just the transmission of a culture's values and beliefs into its young. Accordingly, these self-identifying radicals have adopted what they have ben taught: that socialism is essentially liberal neoliberalism with a smattering of ultra-neoliberal policies like massive immigration, which serves to keep prices high and costs low while masking economic stagnation and the falling standard of living.

They're not looking for mass immigration, they're looking for the government to have the slightest shred of accountability for the workforce.

Yes but socialism to them is when the government does stuff. Free college and healthcare is basically all they want to change. Can't blame them, but it means a hell of a lot less

This is total bullshit and you know it. 90% of """socialist""" """""""activism"""""" consists of encouraging the state to further their economic misery in ways that are socially acceptable (but which are, critically, completely compatible with global capital) like prostrating themselves for more immigration and thus endlessly worse conditions. None of these kids are looking to improve their conditions: if they were, they would be fighting to limit inflation or immigration. Instead, we get green haired cunts screeching for more welfare-accepting immigrants because Buzzfeed told them it was cool, thus deepening their already infinitesimal chance of labour/material security, and LARPers who say that we should storm parliament and/or "munch the wealthy".

Fucking liberals make me so angry. IRL left-wing activism is such a joke now thanks to the idpol crowd. If anything, we need to clearly divorce ourselves from them in order to attract an actually revolutionary/pragmatic youth who stand a chance at effecting actual change.

wait, but Holla Forums said this was the most conservative generation ever.

Not only that, they allow cooprerations to brainwash and bribe their employees into rejecting union literature.

For the low, low price of 13 p/h

no they say that about gen z

What immigration laws do you think would improve working conditions?

There was one man, who warned us

wat

Is there a link to the actual study conducted by VCMF? The article is a little vague and doesn't detail what questions the afformentioned 'young people' were asked.

*Marxism

Come on now, SJWs are non-existent at this point

Are there people who unironically believe capitalism has ever, does, or will ever look like this?

the majority of americans does believe it

So what this actually means is that most snake people want to live in social democracy rather than a libertarian hellhole.

Capital apologists always shill it as such so some people must believe it at least.

US Military : 18% socialism 60% not socialism

Only one that matters

...

AMERICA

Cutting immigration altogether would be optimal, otherwise cutting it down to less than 100,000 per year. Remember, porky ensures that the economic strength of a polity is measured by GDP, which is simply the amount of money that is spent there. Immigration then ensures that 'muh economy' can never truly regress in strength because, as we all know, everyone is coerced into spending money in order to survive. If they cannot earn money they are simply given money that is either taken from others (mostly workers) or borrowed from one of porky's piggie banks (IMF, World Bank, Barclays etc.) and then doled out in the knowledge that the proles will have to repay it eventually, with interest naturally.

Of course, the owners of the property rights of goods and services, and especially housing, inevitably reap massive profits because the constant population growth ensures that there is a floor under prices that simply cannot go down. This is the principle reason why housing costs are so outrageously expensive in cities, and why they are even more expensive in cities with exploding populations due to immigration (i.e. Melbourne, Vancouver, London, etc. etc.): the buyers know that purchasing and holding/hoarding property is essentially printing free money, they simply cannot lose because the demand will always be there and the supply will always be finite. The only thing that can change the situation is interest rates adjusting, but that can a. be easily avoided and/or b. highly profitable is prepared for. This same rule applies to everything: technology, foodstuffs, whatever, while obviously also creating downward pressure on wages due to increased competition for work. Everybody wants every dollar in everyone else's pocket, that is the nature of the beast. This process is squeezed further by the relentless march of automation, causing even greater competition and thus an even greater upward movement of capital. The way to ensure that money continues to be spent in the lands of a greying population that doesn't replace themselves, and thus to ensure ones own survival in a capitalist system? Simply fill them with workers/consumers who will. The resulting despair can be seen all around us, as real wages continue to fall but our states become "richer".

Immigration is absolutely a capitalist weapon; Marx is rolling in his grave.

How do you plan on stopping immigration buddy?

You should know better, Holla Forums.

How was it defined? Did they ask about welfare or healthcare or actually specifically wrote "socialism"? Who and where did they ask?

The most intelligent ones are probably the ones who answered "Not sure" as I doubt any of these people could properly define capitalism and socialism.

Collaborating with porky so the evil browns down tek hiz jorb because he's a reactionary microbrain

Muh immigrants aren't driving up London or New York housing prices, that is speculators and other porkies who don't need citizenship, residency, or even to have ever set foot in the counrry to buy a million dollar condo.

Muh inflation is the number one concern of neoliberals and is why unemployment is being kept so high.

Muh welfare is also being happily dismantled by porky.

>>>Holla Forums
And stay there, dipshit. I mean, yeah, you get a certain amount of credit for memorizing some buzzwords, but your actual content is so transparently reactionary it doesn't help.

...

...

Or no on all of them because none of these has anything to do with workers owning the means of production.
Some of them are symptoms of socialist government but it does not make them socialist.

What the hell is wrong with Fightback. Their literally the only Leftwing group in my entire city that doesn't appear to have 20 people. So of course they shill for the NDP.

What the hell is wrong with this country.

“Socialism is when the government restricts your free speech.”

t. Marx

No it was leninism who did the whole lower stage communism is socialism thing. Other movements just loosely use it because it's well known

Even succdems have more cred than you.

No. They don't want socialism

I fucking hate this country.

But that would require them to answer no because of the right reasons, which I sincerely doubt.

Welp, you're getting good jobs instead of gulag work instead.

yeah right, fuck off back to pol

...

I'm sure Africa isn't automating anything. Move there if the bush life is your thing.

extremely normal response my dude

Reminder that to most people the words "socialism" and "capitalism" are like "freedom," "the pursuit of happiness," or "tyrrany." They are just words to describe how you feel about and what you associate with a form of public policy. In 🍔burger🍔stan, we call this kind of word a "principle." It means jack shit when it comes to concrete, technical policy - a way of looking at things that has been all but systematically eliminated from general discourse. Most of these people do not even conceive of capitalism vs. socialism as defining material relationships in the process of production. The reason why state capitalism (or "full monopoly" capitalism as some people have started calling it) is what people associate with communism is because they literally cannot imagine a system other than capitalism and that's the closest to communism (public ownership of everything) they can get. If you get people to describe their understanding of a feudal economy this is similarly clear. They assume and project generalized commodity production onto feudalism when in fact most production was done for use and most produce held in common, a minority of total produce going to the nobility and a minority being traded externally (this last one being the extent of commodities).

reminder that Americans literally think Britain is socialist.

how was even remotely Holla Forums?
slit your wrists retard

I'm to lazy to read any of that but im pretty sure most millenials just want social democracy.

Notice how none of you actually provided an argument. Massive immigration has always been driven from above you dumbfucks for precisely the reasons that I mentioned, its not fucking hard to understand. Its also not hard to understand that these migrants vote as a block for mainstream dems in the US, mainstream labour in the UK/Aus etc., there is no substantial interest in radical politics there despite what you might have read on Counterpunch.

Look, while I'm sure we'd all like to have a revolutionary vanguard that consists of charcoal black, wheelchair bound, legless schizophrenic deaf lesbians, this LARPing needs to stop. I thought this board hated idpol more than anything, can't you fucking grasp that measures like immigration keep the population in check because they believe that the economy is growing stronger and that they "just need to try harder"? CLEARLY ensuring that there is population growth is bad for the working classes because it increases competition while raising costs, how the fuck can you reject this? Is this one of those - don't talk about it - things because it would upset the liberals too much?

Because this board is scared as fuck of attracting Holla Forums. Problem is that this way they attract reddit.
I agree with you

You're confused.

Holla Forums is only reddit refugees now. Not here.

There was a thread few weeks ago where people said shit like "Reddit isn't that bad". Seriously. We got the reddit problem too in here.

Spoiler: they're the ones in this thread pushing for brown capitalism due to a lifetime of idpol, while REEEACTIONARYing at anyone who says otherwise.

See:

I'm pretty sure this is just clickbait for boomers and self-hating cucks on Holla Forums to look at and feel fake moral outrage over.

That's what I was saying.
People talk shit about the anti-idpol and more conservative crowd on here, they always existed. The tranny loving, intersectional, "SJW are not a problem" crowd are new. This board has gone to shit since Cville

VoC are becoming masters of the self-own.

You can love trannies and hate SJWs, just like you can love black people and hate SJWs.

Yall so negative about this.

It's great the interest is there, it's up to us to cultivate it.

You get the point idiot.

Not really, given the amount of shilling from Holla Forums. "tranny loving" is the same format of insult as niggerlover.

But hey, states are totally getting more legitimate in the 21st century so it should all work out great!

Half of millenials want socialism.

Half of whites feel oppressed

Hmmm, I've got an idea…..(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Unironically fuck off back to reddit you fucking dunce. You glow in the dark.

You are projecting.

Good luck commies, we are coming. You have 20 years tops

Strasserism is succdem tier
NazBol is superior

There is no evidence for this.