Can we talk about the fact there's an obvious organized effort going on right now to turn leftypol actually reactionary...

Can we talk about the fact there's an obvious organized effort going on right now to turn leftypol actually reactionary? The instant flags were removed half of all posters are suddenly Asserites calling for a united front against idpol. I see more anti-SJW agitprop on leftypol now than I see anywhere else. We're clearly being astroturfed hard by stormfront and nazbols.

Other urls found in this thread:

blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/10/12/scientists-who-model-ethnic-violence-find-that-in-switzerland-separation-is-key-to-peace/
brookings.edu/articles/ethnicity-an-african-predicament/
dailycal.org/2017/10/27/uc-berkeley-announces-new-meme-studies-department-fall-2018/#comment-3588232062
bopsecrets.org/CF/graffiti.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

"actually reactionary" = s*cially c*nservative

Asserite= str*sserite

wordfilters are cancer as well

We have to Google Bookchin harder

But thats a good word filter

SJWs are even less of a force than they were back when pol started falseflagging as them everywhere. They're irrelevant, and your obsession with them exposes where your sympathies lay.


no, it isn't. no wordflter is a good wordfilter even if it's gramatically correct.

It does seem like we're being raided, with these two first posts in this thread, the shitflinging mess that is the R*java wordfilter thread and the catalog doesn't look all that good either.
Though I seriously doubt it'd be to make the Xirard reactionary, it's tearing it apart. And there really is not that much anti-SJW rhetoric here, if you look at Holla Forums or Holla Forums, from whatever chan, you'll see a damn lot more. Lately mentions of SJWs have risen a lot, I'm thinking it's the Holla Forums refugees because six months ago things were really fucking different, and we also seem to have more redditors talking about class reductionism.
I feel like things went down the drain when Bat'ko was "avenged", and r/fullcommunism crap just made things worse. I miss how things were earlier this year, I had just found this place and it seemed so nice.

It started with the official incel thread.

We must stand strong, lad.

no they're good

Hold the fuck up, why was boa.rd changed to Xirard? The fuck is up with BO?

Yeah. I just noticed the tape on her laptop's webcam, so that makes me slightly happier.

nah its b.o which is changed to xir
this drama is possibly the dumbest ive ever seen

this board

I think it's more related to the resetting of flags that perturabeted the userbases habits. People were used to flags to identify shitposts and now they're gone we are a bit more suspicious. B O just gave a little flick but in this context that was enough.
With time i think things will return to the usual.

ftfy

Don't be paranoid NazBol is a joke it doesn't exist.

Blame the B.O. for getting rid of the flags.

By nazbol I basically mean class reductionist or brocialist, it's just that nazbol is leftypols preferred terminology. Reactionary """leftists"""

Thats not what a nazbol is at all, leftypol for the most part is made up of class "reductionists" and brocialist

It's not what nazbol means to Aleksandr Dugin. It is precisely what nazbol means on leftypol.

Absolutely not. Nazbol in Holla Forums is anticapitalism + racialism.

...

Nazbol is a decolonial movement standing up for the struggle of eurasian POC against atlanticist oppression.

This

I am unapologetically actually reactionary and I have been here for over a year.

s*cially conservative

why do you consider yourself actually reactionary? just asking. What would you say are your main disagreements with social liberals? are you for racism or gebociding the lgbt community?

Fuck off newfag

Me too. I actually think that, in a secular society without religion, the only way people can feel rooted, in a society they can understand, is through a culture that changes very slowly if at all. Progressivism is fetishising change for the sake of change (based on the rather groundless assumption that any cultural change must be or is probably progress).


The fuck?

In my experience, people who are religious and follow 'traditional values' are far happier and more fulfilled than those who do not.
I spent some time with a loony religious commune which really changed my perspective of things. Communities are far more harmonious when people adhere to (certain) religions.

I find it hard to articulate support for things like weed and the gay lifestyle from a collectivist perspective. The gay lifestyle in particular is just peak liberalism, and is just freedumb for the sake of nihilistic hedonism. (This includes traps who are most definitely gay)

Life in multi-ethnic countries would improve if they Balkanized. Social strife and political conflict is part and parcel of living in diverse societies.
no

Lmao

?Social strife and political conflict is part and parcel of living in diverse societies.

Guy who posted above here, would def. agree with this. Switzerland is doing just perfect, and Tanzania is doing fine as well, because different groups have their own space. (The rest of Africa sees almost all of its conflicts through some kind of ethnic lense)

...

...

To clarify, they do well in terms of social strife.

Good to see leftypol has at least one other con.

Read about the Kibbutz, "traditional values" arise organically

What else is there besides nihilistic hedonism?
A human lives for 50-100 years and then their life is over. Marx is just as dead as Hitler at the end of the day.

0/10, see me after class

Btw heres some source for those claims I made.

blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/10/12/scientists-who-model-ethnic-violence-find-that-in-switzerland-separation-is-key-to-peace/

brookings.edu/articles/ethnicity-an-african-predicament/ (Written by a Somalian AFAIK)

All the more evidence that we need to genetically engineer humans to remove petty tribalism from our psyche.

Yeah this is precisely what disturbs me about progressives generally, the easy inclination to any alteration, no matter how fundamental, no matter how potentially dangerous. There's no bridge that must not be crossed. The people who started eugenics also had good intentions.

You can't 'just' engineer genes, they overlap on multiple levels and it's very hard to say how a change will affect the organism. Plus, will it be mandatory? What do you do with people who do not want to be tampered with?

The race-tribe exists only at the level of an oppressed race, and in the name of the oppression it suffers: there is no race but inferior, minoritarian; there is no dominant race; a race is defined not by its purity but rather by the impurity conferred upon it by a system of domination. Bastard and mixed-blood are the true names of race. Rimbaud said it all on this point: only he or she can invoke race who says, "I have always been of an inferior race… I am of an inferior race for all eternity. . . There I am on the Breton shore … I am a beast, a nigger . . . I am of a distant race: my ancestors were Norsemen.

I'm not talking about race, I'm talking about ethnicity. People react badly to difference. I therefore wonder why the left seems so intent on maximizing it.

For starters, group belonging and self-actualization. The great thing about religion is that installs tendencies in people that mesh well with these pursuits.

My nibba

I realize exactly how hard the problem is.
Wait for them to die and take subtle measures to reduce their fertility. You need to think on grander time scales. It's okay if it takes a thousand years. That's nothing compared to the life expectancy of the universe.

I'm only half joking.

You mean submissive triggers and authoritarian-neurotic mindset? No thanks.

Yeah, you find meaning as a subject in othersubjects you care about and can influence meaningfully in their life; these are always part of some group you identify with (family, group of friends).

You can select for phenotypes relatively easily though.

Yeah, I've got nothing against you, but that's exactly the authoritarian mindset that makes the left scary sometimes.

That's just another brand of nihilistic hedonism. Just because it's a more efficient route to long-term (

Any attempt at eugenics will fail, with no exception. Mishapen mutants would have to be purged mercilessly, just like the noble class had to be purged in revolutionary effort.

Yeah but you're interfering with the group-mechanic, something fundamental to human existence. You might fuck up hugely. Everything we do relates to some group we privilege (family, friends)

...

I didn't bring up the subject man, I responded to this post: All the more evidence that we need to genetically engineer humans to remove petty tribalism from our psyche.

That's a huge generalisation right there.

I don't want to be in charge of it. I'm nowhere near smart enough to do it properly. I'm actually the opposite of an authoritarian.
The fact is we need some kind of benevolent super-intelligence to act as a benevolent dictator and protect us from ourselves. Without it anarchy will always give way to authoritarianism.


Maybe if humans tried it. It's far from an intractable problem though.

...

It could. The only question is whether the loss of "humanity" would be acceptable.

I think it's just 🍔burger🍔s

Yeah lol.


You're really right, it was a rash statement. I meant something along the lines of: "almost everyone we care about we include in a privileged group. Hence, our most meaningful actions are group related."

this goes straight into spook territory

-Subjectively meaningful

I'd tend to agree. Others might feel differently.

-I'm actually the opposite of an authoritarian.

-The fact is we need some kind …dictator… and protect us from ourselves

"I'm actually the opposite of a n a z i but the fact is we need H i t l e r."

Wut?

>That's just another brand of nihilistic hedonism. Just because it's a more efficient route to long-term (

I actually read and like Stirner, but he doesn't recognize that people need their neuroses. We can't live the way he wants us to live (and if you read his biography, I don't think he was a happy man). I'd rather be spooked than totally disrooted and alientated tbh, and that's completely egoist.

Literally fit for only being food for the cyborgs and maybe not even that.

There's no right-wing effort to do anything to us (that isn't transparent and cringeworthy). We're just trying to shed the diseased skin that's made the left undesirable to the masses..

Until we know exactly, and I mean EXACTLY how everything in human brain functions, to the very tiniest of detail; until it can be monitored and safeguarded genetic engineering is fools errand. It is very unwise to mess with something that could be potentially easily broken, and there is no other species on this planet that is remotely comparable to human to experiment with.

...

The optimal society is one in which every sapient being has the maximum possible amount of freedom.
Humans, when left to their own devices, tend to oppress one another. The more humans you put together, the more they try to impose their views on each other.
The solution is to give all the power to a single perfectly benevolent entity who will only use that power to keep the humans from oppressing one another.


Oh, I agree. It wouldn't be safe to do any time soon. In a few hundred years maybe.

I couldn't agree more. Atheism and Nihlism are not a recipe for happiness in my experience, so why should we prescribe it to society.

I'm not wrong, learn your neurotransmitters.

So your argument is that if you want meaning and dislike change you have to be fed to cyborgs? It's not even an argument and you come across as psychotic this way.

seconded

Who is gonna code said entity? And who controls the fail-safe? Sorry man, but all these grand schemes just sound dangerous.

Egoism is…

-Atheism and Nihlism are not a recipe for happiness in my experience, so why should we prescribe it to society.

Yeah, risking a circlejerk, really agree. "I want society to look this way so despite what it does to people" regrettably defines a lot of what the left says sometimes

The singularity is pretty much an inevitability as long as we don't destroy ourselves first. We just have to do our best to make it benevolent.

A failsafe would be about as useful as giving guns to pet dogs in case their owners abuse them.

Concentration of power leads to increased violence and reduced freedom and quality of life. Besides no entity is truly capable of said level of benevolence in the first place. It will always prioritise its own survival. Many a state was thought to be a wish granting device, yet national interest ever seems to feed on people.

And who will make it 'benevolent'? The people with power, the coders. Trusting them is the similar to trusting fascists to run the state for the benefit of all. But I agree that, if more tech is inevitable due to competition, we will have to cope with it.

I bet if you surveyed the happiness of Mormons and self-described Egoists, you would find that Mormons report being significantly happier, even when controlling for other variables.

Thisthisthis

It defines entirety of politics, and not regretably. Intentionally. It is a feature, not a bug. Environment needs to adapt to people who create it for themselves.

Who writes sentences like this? So matter of factly.
Nigger you don't have a fucking clue what concentration of power means or what violence, freedom and quality of life is. Even if you did you don't know the context in which everyone else here understand those things. Just shut your mouth you fucking dork.

Politics nowadays actually limits itself on purpose. (Checks and balances, human rights, constitutions). The basic concensus, which I think is largely benign, is that you don't have the right to prescribe whatever you want to anyone.

-Environment needs to adapt to people who create it for themselves.

The environment doesn't need to do shit man. This presupposition is just groundless. If people reproduce the same environment it doesn't change.

I hope we turn Luddite and have a Butlerian Jihad before we get to the singularity.

lol

funny how muh unspooked transhumanists can't help but reinvent, over and over again, the same cliched religious narrative in which a crudely anthropomorphic AI god, a benevolent totalitarian patriarchal figure similar the old God of the hebrews but even cruder and less imaginative. Muh cyber YHWH is basically a super autist who makes everything 100% rational(tm) using the powers of logic and science.

lol yeah.

Yes, the bureaucracy took the backseat to let the holy markets do their job…


Whoopsy, people die, get born, have different ideas and problems… it's truly out of hand most of the time.

Fuck off you claim not to be reactionary, yet your ideas are that of the biggest reactionary ever, Hobbs. The idea that we need a benevolent dictator comes from Absolute Monarchy. The Monarchist argued that the silly peasants couldn’t govern themselves. You aren’t a leftist, you’re just a reactionary with LGBT+ characteristics.

Agreed, people are just so naturally corruptible that we must destroy these forms of societal organization that have a collective responsibility and in turn erect decentralized institutions with no form of organization that will be infinitely more benevolent and just.

...

honestly i would settle for 'a bit more suitable for use' but that works too

This are difference between being spooked and genticly modifying people’s brain and castrating those who refuse.

I bet if there were such surveys I would have know about them.

That sounds completely psychopathic.

Not the guy you are responding to, but I think you read Hobbes a bit wrong. His main idea is that the state's authority must be absolute, no matter who wields political power. His preference may have been monarchy, but he had the same prescription for republics.

Lame ass excuse for a whirlpool of cultural change. The pace of change varied intenesely across history, and cultures generally try to reproduce themselves. Communism would very probably be slow since it doesn't have the rabid change-incentives the cappie market has.

—Yes, the bureaucracy took the backseat to let the holy markets do their job…

Not a fair argument. The market is horrid. That the state doesn't chop of your arm for insulting a politician like in 1500 is pretty neat.

Thumbs up for close readings!

Some quick googling seems to indicate that these studies have been done with religious and non religious people, and the religious are notably happier.

Wow I have purpose in my life and a clear set of rules but ofc I'm just as unhappy as an atheist xd

But the reason Hobbs supported Absolute Monarchy is because he believed that if the commoners ran things there would be terrony.

Was there ever a state where commoners actually ran things? Because there's always some elite class around to man the state. Even in Athens citizens had to pay a certain amount of tax (or so I remember)

I kind of agree with Hobbes on that front. Universal suffrage is dumb. Epistocracy would be an improvement to liberal democracy.

Dang man. I know this feel.

Same.

we are the
SOCIALY CONSERVATIVE GANG

>>>Holla Forums

Is the outcome of elections improved by allowing people with felony convictions, Down syndrome, or dementia to vote?

Why does your opion matter more then theres. You’re both equalls under the law due to being citizens.

suffrage itself is dumb imo. universal telepathy would be an improvement over hierarchical and legalistic forms of government.

this is simultaneously hilarious and depressing. BOs have finally COINTELPRO'd Holla Forums. Still, honestly, fuck nazbols and asserites. At least idpol socialists pretend to care about other people

Because the organ in their body that helps them form opinions is malfunctioning.

tbh the whole individualist vs collectivist ideology is a liberal view

I honestly truly care about other people, which is why I can see that BLM is completely right about everything

...

And by who’s standerd do you determin who’s “fuctiing properly.” It’s a slipery slope where those against the Status Quo might lose there right to vote.


No it’s Egoism.

this, I used to be an edgy white guy who got triggered by the boogeyman of political correctness. But I've changed, I've had the luck to meet some very wise queer and POC comrades who helped me grow and becoeme a better person I now understand how easy I really had it as a white guy. I unironically 'check my privilege' FEELS GOOD MAN

This had better be bait

But you want to seize the property of hard working people and give it to layabouts and tranny faggots like you. How is this not authoritarian and founded upon a neurotic hatred of the successful?

I think reddit liberals are also trying to coopt us. These faggots for example have gotten little to no flak.


Look at these faggots? Class reductionist? I guarantee they see race and sex outside of class structure, they have no minds for theory and are the equivalent of fascists in Capitalism. They just act revolutionary for police scapegoats while they support liberals.
You deserve to be bullied by the entirety of Holla Forums for your shitty postings. You are an absolute fuckwit who cant even into basic politics.

Top meme man, go tell me about how hard it is to own stock, or to push around literal millions. Consider your toothbrush collectivized.
Pigs and cows have more or less secured their position in evolutionary competition, so would you herald them as successors to be fawned over? (yet I wouldn't be surprised if you would herald pigs as animals to be emulated). Your idea of success is warped by those holding power.

Hey, I was just pointing out that most us here could be classified as "class reductionists" and that OP doesn't know what Nazbol means here

The implication of reductionist is quite clearly "over simplifying" to say the least, but if it is simply a word we disagree over and not the meaning, then I apologize.
I'm just a little "on edge(?)" because of the recent drama and the influx of what I can only see as redditors. I just hate the idea of class collaborationists polluting pure class theory with their shitty Capitalist ideals.

Oh no, I absolutly agree. I should clarify though that I'm this poster . I have no idea where all these newfags are coming from though, some say neogaf or reddit.

Neither of these are correct, National Bolshevism is closest to be described as a synthesis of bolshevism and the conservative revolution in Germany. Its not "anti capitalism plus racialism" and its certainly not simple anti identity politics leftism either. I mean if were to be honest Nazbol would be a idpol tendency just not in the sense typically used.

First poster you mentioned, I know what actual NazBol is. I was just mocking how OP thought NazBol meant class reductionists and brocialists because that would then make most of us NazBols.

wew, it's actually /r/socialism

Stop this shit.
Stop destroying this board

Nazbol is actually a real ideology, and not an epithet for class reductionists. Read Dugin

We are all NAZBOL now.

The horror, the horror.

The more anti idpol and anti SJW this board is, the better. I'd rather have it go to far in this regard rather than becoming just another crypto-liberal haunt, as has happened to most other lefty sites. It's the raison d'être of Holla Forums. If you want your fix of idpol, just go back to leddit.

It actually improved things. Now we can have a place to converse with, convert and /or bully them without shitting up the entire board. We should do it for more semi-controversial topics. In fact, a containment thread for actual idpollers (left and right) would also be neat.

Nigger, that's the biggest back door for Holla Forumsyps and reactionaries off of rational Skepticologist Youtube channels to swarm the place and turn it into their circlejerk shitfest like they did with 4chan.
That meme, that fucking word needs to die, call it idpol and adress ALL its forms, which include most of the right.

wanna know how I know you're false flagging?
Anyway, your concerns are moot. Race "realist" thread get sunk, obvious Holla Forumsyps get banned, and so on. There is no right idpol being smuggled in through the back door, and all claims that we have to go easy on left idpol/SJWism for that reason are either misguided, or attempts at sabotage.

Like clockwork

Eh, I'm certainly a social conservative. As far as I'm concerned, the promotion of homosexuality and transsexuality will end up doing immense damage to our civilisation, much the same way as a concerted "Pro Ana" movement would.

I am also of the opinion that while class distinctions are important, there is little doubt that ethnic divisions cause immense strife in a society, and so generally it would probably lead to more lasting peace if societies remained homogenous. However, at this point my country (the UK) is too far gone to do anything about multiracialism, so we may as well just try and make the best out of it. Maybe I'm wrong about the potential for sectarian violence, and that the current strife is merely a result of capitalism. I hope I am wrong, but I fear history shows that I'm not.

Not that guy, but how does saying nigger on an imageboard out someone as a false flagger?

Literally one post removed.

You're sounding a lot like Holla Forums tbqh.

God forbid people speak their mind. I'm fine with this kind of post; it clearly states that it concerns a personal opinion, is not an OP, and does not try to convert people. Feel free to engage with that poster if he enrages you so. I guarantee that if he goes to far, you can report him and he will get banned. Iron clad guarantee.

It seems disingenuous to go on a rant about the use of "SJW" and how this is bringing in right idpol language, while prefacing your post with "nigger". It's a part of imageboard culture that we can do without.

I made that thread and I can assure you I'm not a sleeper cell from Holla Forums, it's just an interesting topic.

Actually the exact opposite. I see a lot of people bringing Liberal views on here latley

The thread is unironically cancer tbqh. Most "incels" are just bitter losers who could get laid if they really wanted to.

Some I suspect are legitimate; those with actual disabilities, mental or physical (dwarfism, disfigurements, paraplegics, autism etc.) but most tend to be average looking, slightly effeminate, chubby blokes. And I can tell you, plenty of those get laid.

Too bad, nigger.

...

how the fuck did optional flags stop a raid, and why do you think there's a raid right now when things seem like normal to me

Holla Forums is in a permanent state of siege against polyps and baizuos, and ultimately our only defense was and still is to keep smart and not fall for their utterly moronic arguments. I can say without a hint of fedora-tipping that we easily have the intellectual superiority against them. Just don't be afraid to criticize and self-criticize.

You're probably too much of a newfag to even tell leftist anti sjw from Holla Forums bullshit, or you're pic related who thinks we're all literally NAZBOL

haha i said nigger
stay mad

There too many new users coming in and the old board culture isnt being upheld. This is just the eternal september.

Also all the knowledgeable users had all the interesting debates and left because there was nothing left to say. Some of them are still here but since they are bored they just troll hard instead of typing things out.

Slaveocracy is hardly an example of a great democracy

Im not worried about reactionary insects. We are immune to their low autism level bullshit.

We personally? Maybe. We in some collective sense? Definitely not. Holla Forums is currently about halfway through an /r/TumblrInAction speedrun, the board is turning itself entirely reactionary because it's hard to read theory and empathize with the the global poor but it's very easy to agitate against SJWs every single day.


There is absolutely no distinction. You're attacking a meaningless powerless group because of cultural resentment. What is the name for this behavior hmm


I hope you're a literal pol invader, because if not leftypol is even further gone than I thought. There is absolutely nothing leftist about obsessing over cultural grievances and constantly agitating and false flagging yourself. You are probably not even at all a leftist, just edgy but too contrarian to have liberal politics.

Gulag yourself. Idpol threads, especially threads complaining about it, get sunk. Every fucking time - rightly so. To claim that this board is somehow turning reactionary is asinine. You won't come out and say it, but what you really want is more idpol threads - ones where your particular brand of libshit trash is parroted and where you can shame those unsophisticated who aren't quite as woke as you. Fuck that shit.

...

reminder: being 'anti sjw' ALWAYS means being anti empathy and anti basic human decency.

it doesn't obscure the meaning it actually clarifies it and makes it more honest

t. Holla Forums

No, it doesn't. If the point is to talk about how an ideology identifies itself, changing the wording to something more accurate can obscure which group we're talking about. Someone who doesn't know the wordfilter is going to read the post and not know what's being talked about. In this case, "actually reactionary" is a lot more broad and general than "s*cially conservative" which refers to a particular ideology. And given how prone the wordfilters are to changing, this is unhelpful as fuck.

Its old Holla Forumsyps with their idpol. They need to study and learn to see past all the idpol bullshit.

...

It's the opposite, liberals are taking over. This board used to have some sound MLs on here but now these underage liberal fags who believe the muh gorillions propaganda are trying to paint them as nazis

Anti-SJW is only reactionary if that is the core of your politics. What is wrong with having a "safe space" for leftists who are not down with SJWism, want to talk about other things also but also have some camaraderie with other leftists who are on the same page?

Even if SJWism is on the decline, the fact is that most leftist circles (at least that I know of) are quite SJW and this board is a welcome relief from that.

You dumb motherfucker in EVERY SINGLE THREAD the conversation eventually turns into hating on BLM and SJW. People like you aren't even interested in justice or fairness, you just find some limited common cause with communism.

Nothing is wrong with it in a vacuum but anti-SJW is a SIGNIFICANT portion of all the talking leftypol does. Nothing's inherantly wrong with FBI crime stats either but don't pretend you don't know a reactionary fantasy obsession when you see one. In a very real sense those ideological fantasies are what reaction IS, and leftypol is like 10% that at least. It is absolutely a problem, you see who it attracts even if the bait itself isn't a problem for you.

Also when has anybody even mentioned BLM

Fuck off redditor scum

Then debate the people you disagree with. It's what I do. Or do you want daddy mod to come kiss it all better for you?
Weak ass faggot.

Do not fear the truth

amazing digits you fucking liberal

This is an unbelievable oversimplification of how neurotransmitters work. You may have read somewhere that dopamine and serotonin are the feel good NTs of the brain. DA and HT-29 are used for fucking way more than just that. Take a look at Parkinson's disease - that's what a decrease in dopaminergic neurotransmitters looks like. Psychosis is what elevated HT-29 looks like.

I really hope you're not in charge of my state-sponsored lobotomy/eugenics program.

Nazis.

Posadism is the most high state of woke. Fuck off with your reactionary Pol Potism.

$ocial conservatism is always reactionary. Especially in this era where we know better.

No shit see
The point is that not everything that's reactionary is $ocial conservatism so the wordfilter makes the post more vague.

Mfw all mods are SJW idpollers that would actually side with reactionary idpol than the international proletariat.

Sorry, but I'm too edgy and contrarian to have liberal politics per

...

Fuck off we have atleast 5 FI communists here.

wrong thread buddy

This thread got really bad.
A few people came in and attempted to give a reasoned defense for promulgation of 'traditional values' but they got bullied away, and then the thread turned into another conspiratorial meta-circlejerk.

Everyone that has ever posted this image (I suppose one ban evading shitposter) is not even a proper Stalinist, but literally from Holla Forums.

It's been happening for a while, and I've been waiting for mods or someone to finally crack the whip.

ahahahahaha

I told you idiots leftypol had this problem. Good thing mods hit the thread eventually but the same people are in every single thread in the catalog.

Can you stop complaining about some worthless faggots and their "traditional values" shitposts, and perhaps make a valuable theory thread or two if you're actually of any use to this board or leftism?

fuck off, sjw

REDDIT GET THE FUCK OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

seriously when did leftypol start getting to many unironic apologists for sjw/idpol?

LISTEN YOU FUCKING NEWFAGS, Holla Forums IS AGAINST SJWS & IDPOL AND YOU AUTISTIC FAGGOTS NEED TO LEARN THAT RIGHT NOW

It's because of this comment on the Daily Cal's website, the newspaper of the University of California at Berkeley.
dailycal.org/2017/10/27/uc-berkeley-announces-new-meme-studies-department-fall-2018/#comment-3588232062

Back to Holla Forums with you falseflagger.

...

guess i'm just too cynical and irony poisoned to engage in the performative rituals leftists tend to be into. I just can't bring myself to take them seriously. Our society is a fucked proto cyberpunk dystopia, a commodity world void of anything resembling meaning, a boarded up big box consumerplex surrounded by deserted parking lots. where can i find the exit?

Socialism

is that fucking REAL?

Jesus christ. Proof that liberals are the one trying to subvert us

try some self improvement faggot. Go work out and read some books also become marxist

...

via bopsecrets.org/CF/graffiti.htm

the 21st century leaves Humanity in a state of generalised confusion. We just don't know what we are doing anymore. People feel compelled to LARP as traditionalist catholics and/or stirnerite genderfluid polyamorists because the commonsense norms which guided our behavior are no longer there. Everything becomes a political statement. Capitalism tells us everything solid dissolves into the air. We are free to wander in the void, amongst images of blonde women in wheat fields, 86+ fully customisable designer genders, and the detritus of 10,000 years of civilization.

Great piece of writing, comrade.

SJWs want to colonize every leftist space and turn it into a creepy cultish ritual where we have state our preferred pronouns and only allow discussion according to the progressive stack. As we discuss what counts as a non-culturally appropriative Halloween costume, the dystopian forces of state and capital become ever-more powerful. SJWs are part of the fucked society we're fighting against.

Yup, SJWs are controlled opposition, a counter-intelligence operation specifically designed to subvert revolutionary socialist organizations. Not every SJW is in on the conspiracy of course, only a few important leaders are, and then the insecure sheep follow.

I have definitely long suspected this, but had no evidence. Even if it weren't a counter-intelligence operation though, it operates effectively as one. I definitely suspect some of the liberal SJW leaders are CIA operatives, like Shaun King and Ezra Klein. Could just be I hate their stupid faces though.

Their message seems too perfectly tailored to be subversive and divisive to be a coincidence. Along with with their remarkable organization and consistency in presentation, it makes me strongly suspect that they are the work of some intelligence agency. My theory is that the FBI or CIA invented SJWs to break up the Occupy movement along IDPol lines.

cursed posts

Well the roots of SJWism go back a lot further than that. I think it is probably a decades long propaganda effort dating back to the cold war to redirect leftist emphasis on class and towards race and gender, and eventually towards meaningless trivialities, politics as personal identity expression. To be fair I think race and gender are very important, what is suspicious is when class analysis is absent from these.

lel

checked

Sounds highly plausible to me, and I agree with you about race and gender issues.

The truth is banal, unlike your conspiracy theories. muh sjws are a mere product of modern postfordist management and the human resources department. you can trace much of tumblr lingo to 'diversity consultants' and management psychologists. safe spaces and encounter groups were pioneered by people like Werner Ehrhardt back in the 70s.

But how do you know there wasn't an effort from some intelligence agency to inject these ideas into HR departments and colleges? It's possible that it was even the Soviets who did it to undermine America's productive capacity.

I don't doubt it. But conspiracy can amplify banal truth, and finds its most favorable conditions in the banal. It is conspiracy fact that the CIA had a large influence in modern art and popular film. You think they would leave political ideology untouched?

leftypol is unironically in ideological lockstep with the Traditional Workers Party

kill yourselves before I have to kill yourselves.

>>>/plebbit/

Nazbols are nationalists; that's their defining feature along with being nominally socialist.

SJW subverter detected

America's 'productive capacity' was undermined by deindustrialisation and changing market conditions. A postindustrial service oriented economy demands a great deal of emotional involvement from both workers and consumers. Management begins to take an interest in your subjective psychological state. Modern offices and colleges are designed to maximise the market value that can be extracted from you, that's why they have to keep you in a stable psychological state.

It's really not, actually. In the same way that uncomplicated Holla Forums believes somehow in "global alliance of nationalists" nazbols are only "nationalist" in that they buy fascist corpus theory about the "healthy body" of the nation being protected from rot.

You don't think white collar office environments would be more productive if they were more homogenous? It seems to me that the "diversity" push generally makes offices less productive, the drama at Google being a good example. Also, it seems that relatively incompetent people are often put into positions to meet diversity quotas.

You're not making a good point, I was asked to define my use of a different word.

By the way I continue to rest my case that leftypol is reactionary garbage that only fakes superficial leftism the way fascists always do

no u

Our post millenial collar office environments aren't old timey factories, their products are social and immaterial by nature: ad views, the very governance of our society, performance metrics (among which we find 'diversity' stats), and upwards trending graphs meant to impress the stockholders. Working at Google (or any other major tech company for that matter) means to be indoctrinated with buzzwords, to be driven around like a slave, a hamster spinning pointlessly on his wheel, forever. The New Economy is itself a giant bubble, an holographic simulacrum of progress and production.

I'm such a leftist I STARTED being an SJW because they're basically right if annoying sometimes. I used to think class struggle made other oppressions irrelevant but that's only true if you're living in fantasy larpworld where we're fighting in the streets like over a dozen US military bases in Syria already. In the real world SJW are right about sexism, right about racism, right about cops, right about society, etc. and they're the ones sticking to a hard line on justice. None of the purple hair gamergate shit matters the tiniest bit comparatively, you just care an outsized amount because they targETED GAMERS. GAMERS.

SJW: someone who uses caps for EMPHASIS

You can care about sexism, racism, police brutality and not care about gaming, and also not be an SJW.

Sure. I don't start getting suspicious until the catalog is >10% anti-SJW agitprop. There's no moral imperative to identify as an SJW, but the reaction against them is just that- reactionary. Posters on leftypol consistently use cultural resentment against SJWs to attack feminist or antiracist ideas without having to engage with their theory (just the way Holla Forums works)

That's the smartest argument I ever saw

CAN WE START KILLING PORKIES YET?

you have that picture saved huh? What do you use it for?

I wank to it regularly, this one's even better tho.

Does this count as furry?

You probably post it on 4chan and reddit regularly.

lmao

Yeah I post it on reddit all the time it's a really cool website, you should try it there are plenty of reall cool subs for gays and brown people.

bumb

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING HORSEFUCKER!!

The fact that these threads trigger you faggots so much is hilarious.

This board's biggest problem has always been a complete lack of self-awareness.

Get your head out your asses and realise that you have in more in common with these 'incels' than you want to admit. Treating them as subhumans benefits no one, least of all you.

Pick one comrade

[tex]\color{red}{\text{ITS PONY} TIME \text{ syntax.}}[/tex]

Did you know that reactionaries right wingers and Nazis love MLP?
Get those fucking horses OUTTA MY FACE!

WRONG, YOUR INFOGRAPHIC IS WRONG, YOUR COMMENT IS WRONG, YOUR OPINION IS WRONG AND YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED.

YOU WILL BE FIRST INTO THE GULAG WHEN THE REVOLUTION BEGIN.

Wtf is Canada doing in there.
get outta my face you motherfucker.

I ain't goin nowheres m90

OKAY?

where the anchor @