human nature prohibits Marxism. You're delusional .(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
Human nature prohibits Marxism. You're delusional
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.co.uk
twitter.com
"Marxism" isn't anything you don't like, retardo.
Human nature is whatever a human do.
Humans do communism, hence it's human nature.
...
...
Untrue. Communism has never been established anywhere.
...
Neither was capitalism before capitalism.
What's your point?
Still waiting for an actual argument to discuss, Holla Forumstard
Humans lived in stateless, classless societies for 200,000 years. Painful truth for ancaps.
The NAP is a natural part of human behaviour. All humans on a base level understand and appreciate the NAP, in addition to the fact that it establishes itself naturally in an anarchist society.
Actually, capitalism is just the trading of commodities between two individuals, so it has existed for as long as humans have.
Read Hayek, Rothbard, Hoppe, and Mises, then get back to me brainlet.
The fact Stirner exists debunks this.
Humans can believe all sorts of things, but the vast majority have the NAP wired into them. It's just a part of human psychology, and socialism is utopian because it tries to assert the opposite.
Oh come on, even I know this is weak bait.
since when have flags been removed?
Congratulations for being a brainlet that doesn't know what capitalism is as a mode of production.
It's not just trade, it influences how goods - commodities in capitalism - are being produced.
There's also a difference between capitalism and capitalism as a dominant mode of production.
Just because slavery still exists doesn't mean that humanity is operating exclusively under slavery.
End yourself you stupid nigger
JUST
Pedophiles.
The fact it has to be "principle", is evidence to the contrary. If it were hard wired in, there would be no need to teach it. I don't need to be tought to shit, I just do it.
Nah, the NAP is the bourgeois version of the divine right of kings. It's no surprise considering ancaps are neofeudalists.
Pic related suggests convincingly this is false⦠Save everyone some time & just kys user
smash Cultural Hayekianism you goys
bbc.co.uk
Only when it comes to direct, unprovoked physical agression.
However, if i for example stopped paying rent to my landlord, no one would consider this an "agression", whereas the police dragging me out of the apartment because i didn't pay my rent would be seen as agression on a base level.